Annals of Coloproctology

Volume 31(1); February 2015

Editorials

Does BRAF Mutation and Extracellular Signal Regulated Kinase Expression in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Have Any Prognostic Significance?: Moo Jun Baek; Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(1):1-2. Published online February 28, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.1.1

2,619 View
30 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Citations

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Highlights on mechanisms of drugs targeting MDSCs: providing a novel perspective on cancer treatment
Wei Pan, Qian Sun, Yang Wang, Jian Wang, Shui Cao, Xiubao Ren
Tumor Biology.2015; 36(5): 3159. CrossRef

Reduced Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Byung Chun Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(1):3-4. Published online February 28, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.1.3

2,796 View
30 Download
4 Web of Science
3 Citations

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy for hemodialysis patients with dialysis-related renal tumors
Kohei Takei, Mutsushi Yamasaki, Satoki Abe, Naoyuki Yamanaka, Shinya Sejiyama, Takahiro Narimatsu, Shinro Hata, Tadamasa Shibuya, Kenichi Hirai, Tadasuke Ando, Toshitaka Shin, Kenichi Mori, Yasuhiro Sumino, Takeo Nomura, Fuminori Sato, Toshiro Terachi, Hi
Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies.2018; 27(3): 153. CrossRef
Pfannenstiel laparoendoscopic reduced‐port radical nephrectomy
Mutsushi Yamasaki, Toshitaka Shin, Ryuta Sato, Kenichi Hirai, Tomoko Kan, Hiroyuki Fujinami, Kenichi Mori, Yasuhiro Sumino, Takeo Nomura, Fuminori Sato, Hitoshi Masuda, Junji Yonese, Hiromitsu Mimata
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2016; 9(3): 222. CrossRef
Intraumbilical versus periumbilical incision in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial
Jun Suh Lee, Tae Ho Hong
International Journal of Surgery.2016; 33: 83. CrossRef

Can the Timing of Ileostomy Reversal Influence Functional Outcome?: Chang-Nam Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(1):5-6. Published online February 28, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.1.5

2,451 View
42 Download
5 Web of Science
6 Citations

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Efferent limb stimulation prior to loop ileostomy closure: a systematic review and meta-analysis
A. J. Lloyd, N. P. Hardy, P. Jordan, E. J. Ryan, M. Whelan, C. Clancy, J. O’Riordan, D. O. Kavanagh, P. Neary, S. M. Sahebally
Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Laparoscopic vs. open loop ileostomy reversal: a meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies
Fabio Rondelli, Alessandro Gemini, Saverio Cerasari, Stefano Avenia, Walter Bugiantella, Jacopo Desiderio
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Does the timing of protective ileostomy closure post-low anterior resection have an impact on the outcome? A retrospective study
Fozan Sauri, Ahmad Sakr, Ho Seung Kim, Mohammed Alessa, Radwan Torky, Eman Zakarneh, Seung Yoon Yang, Nam Kyu Kim
Asian Journal of Surgery.2021; 44(1): 374. CrossRef
Laparoscopic loop ileostomy reversal with intracorporeal anastomosis is associated with shorter length of stay without increased direct cost
Sarath Sujatha-Bhaskar, Matthew Whealon, Colette S. Inaba, Christina Y. Koh, Mehraneh D. Jafari, Steven Mills, Alessio Pigazzi, Michael J. Stamos, Joseph C. Carmichael
Surgical Endoscopy.2019; 33(2): 644. CrossRef
Cases of low anterior resection and ileostomy for rectal cancer that required more than 18 months for stoma closure
Yutaka Kojima, Kazuhiro Sakamoto, Yuichi Tomiki, Rina Takahashi, Ryoichi Tsukamoto, Toshiaki Hagiwara, Kunihiko Nagakari
Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Triple VY Advancement Flap For Vulva And Anal Reconstruction In Extensive Perineal Squamous Cell Carcinoma In-Situ
Chairani Fitri Saphira, Bien Keem Tan, Sun Kuie Tay
Jurnal Plastik Rekonstruksi.2018; 4(2): 113. CrossRef

Effect of a Purse-String Approximation Following Stoma Takedown on Wound Infection and Satisfaction: In Ja Park; Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(1):7-8. Published online February 28, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.1.7

2,379 View
42 Download

PDF

Original Articles

Clinicopathologic Significance of BRAF Mutation and Extracellular Signal Regulated Kinase 1/2 Expression in Patients With a Colorectal Adenocarcinoma: Hyung Ook Kim, Beom Gyu Kim, Seong Jae Cha, Yong Gum Park, Tae Jin Lee; Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(1):9-15. Published online February 28, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.1.9

3,533 View
51 Download
5 Web of Science
4 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

BRAF mutation and expression of extracellular signal regulated kinase (ERK) are linked with colorectal carcinogenesis through the serrated pathway. BRAF and ERK1/2 play important roles in the activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase signaling pathways. The present study investigated the clinicopathologic outcomes of BRAF mutation and ERK1/2 expression in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and the possibility of using them as prognostic indicators.

Methods

Dual-priming oligonucleotide-based multiplex polymerase chain reaction for BRAF^V600E mutation and immunohistochemical analysis of ERK1/2 were performed using 65 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples from patients with CRC. We analyzed the dependences of the clinicopathologic features on BRAF mutation and ERK1/2 expression.

Results

Out of 65 samples from CRC patients, BRAF mutation was detected in 3 (4.6%). The 3 patients with BRAF mutation presented with T3 CRC with lymph node metastasis (stage III) showing moderately or poorly differentiated histology. ERK1 and ERK2 were positively detected in 73.8% and 15.4% of the patients with CRC, respectively. ERK1 expression was significantly correlated with lymph node metastasis (P = 0.049). ERK2 expression was significantly correlated with tumor emboli (P < 0.05), tumor invasion (P = 0.035), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.017), and stage (P = 0.02).

Conclusion

BRAF mutation and ERK1/2 expression may be associated with advanced or more aggressive CRC. These molecular markers might play prognostic roles in CRC developed through the serrated pathway.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

BRAF protein immunoprecipitation, elution, and digestion from cell extract using a microfluidic mixer for mutant BRAF protein quantification by mass spectrometry
Yen-Heng Lin, Heng-Yun Chang, Chia-Chun Wu, Chia-Wei Wu, Kai-Ping Chang, Jau-Song Yu
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.2019; 411(5): 1085. CrossRef
Combined detection of the expression of Nm23-H1 and p53 is correlated with survival rates of patients with stage II and III colorectal cancer
Yinying Wu, Yi Li, Xiaoai Zhao, Danfeng Dong, Chunhui Tang, Enxiao Li, Qianqian Geng
Oncology Letters.2017; 13(1): 129. CrossRef
Progression inference for somatic mutations in cancer
Leif E. Peterson, Tatiana Kovyrshina
Heliyon.2017; 3(4): e00277. CrossRef
DoesBRAFMutation and Extracellular Signal Regulated Kinase Expression in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Have Any Prognostic Significance?
Moo Jun Baek
Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(1): 1. CrossRef

Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for a Tumor-Specific Mesorectal Excision in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Initial Experience With 20 Consecutive Cases: Sung Uk Bae, Se Jin Baek, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Nam Kyu Kim, Hyuk Hur; Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(1):16-22. Published online February 28, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.1.16

5,495 View
33 Download
25 Web of Science
21 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

Single-port plus one-port, reduced-port laparoscopic surgery (RPLS) may decrease collisions between laparoscopic instruments and the camera in a narrow, bony, pelvic cavity while maintaining the cosmetic advantages of single-incision laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study is to describe our initial experience with and to assess the feasibility and safety of RPLS for tumor-specific mesorectal excisions (TSMEs) in patients with colorectal cancer.

Methods

Between May 2010 and August 2012, RPLS for TSME was performed in 20 patients with colorectal cancer. A single port with four channels through an umbilical incision and an additional port in the right lower quadrant were used for RPLS.

Results

The median operation time was 231 minutes (range, 160-347 minutes), and the estimated blood loss was 100 mL (range, 50-500 mL). We transected the rectum with one laparoscopic stapler in 17 cases (85%). The median time to soft diet was 4 days (range, 3-6 days), and the length of hospital stay was 7 days (range, 5-45 days). The median total number of lymph nodes harvested was 16 (range, 7-36), and circumferential resection margin involvement was found in 1 case (5%). Seven patients (35%) developed postoperative complications, and no mortalities occurred within 30 days. During the median follow-up period of 20 months (range, 12-40 months), liver metastasis occurred in 1 patient 10 months after surgery, and local recurrence was nonexistent.

Conclusion

RPLS for TSME in patients with colorectal cancer is technically feasible and safe without compromising oncologic safety. However, further studies comparing RPLS with a conventional, laparoscopic low-anterior resection are needed to prove the advantages of the RPLS procedure.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Short-term outcomes of da Vinci SP versus Xi for colon cancer surgery: a propensity-score matching analysis of multicenter cohorts
Jin-Min Jung, Young Il Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Songsoo Yang, Min Hyun Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2023; 17(6): 2911. CrossRef
Short-term and long-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a propensity-matched cohort study with conventional laparoscopic surgery
Mingyi Wu, Hao Wang, Xuehua Zhang, Jiaolong Shi, Xiaoliang Lan, Tingyu Mou, Yanan Wang
BMC Gastroenterology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Effects of Sevoflurane versus Propofol on Endogenous Nitric Oxide Metabolism during Laparoscopic Surgery
Ning Wang, Jing Zhang, Ruiling Zhao, Bin Zhao, Yongzhang Li, Xiaoqing Zhang, Peng Liu, Yang Gao
Journal of Healthcare Engineering.2021; 2021: 1. CrossRef
Reduced port versus open right hemicolectomy for colorectal cancer: a retrospective comparison study of two centers
Peter Tschann, Gerald Seitinger, Daniel Lechner, Stephanie Adler, Benedikt Feurstein, Paolo N. C. Girotti, Theresa Schmölzer, Philipp Szeverinski, Felix Aigner, Ingmar Königsrainer
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(7): 1469. CrossRef
Reduced-Port Robotic Right Colectomy with Intracorporeal Anastomosis for Right-Sided Colon Cancer Using the da Vinci Single-Site® Platform: A Pilot Case Series Study
Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
Annals of Robotic and Innovative Surgery.2021; 2(2): 31. CrossRef
Short‐ And medium‐term outcomes of reduced‐port laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with upper rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study
Huawen Wu, Zhijian Zheng, Lewei Xu, Yingying Wu, Ziyi Guan, Wenhuan Li, Guofu Chen
Cancer Medicine.2020; 9(15): 5320. CrossRef
Laparoscopic resection of retroperitoneal paraganglioma behind the Spiegel lobe in a kyphotic patient: A rare case report
Hisataka Ogawa, Shin Nakahira, Tomoya Kishimoto, Kazuya Kato, Makoto Hasegawa, Keisuke Oyama, Takayuki Tou, Ryosuke Maki, Hoshi Himura, Hidemi Nishi, Nobuyoshi Ohhara, Jota Mikami, Yoichi Makari, Ken Nakata, Masaki Tsujie, Junya Fujita, Hiroki Ohzato
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2019; 12(3): 344. CrossRef
A review of reports on single-incision laparoscopic surgery for Crohn’s disease
Kiyoshi Maeda, Hisashi Nagahara, Masatsune Shibutani, Tatsunari Fukuoka, Toru Inoue, Masaichi Ohira
Surgery Today.2019; 49(5): 361. CrossRef
Comparison of the short-term outcomes of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery and conventional multiport surgery in colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
Ji Hoon Kang, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim, Han Deok Kwak, Jae Kyun Ju, Young Jin Kim
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2018; 94(3): 147. CrossRef
The feasibility and short-term clinical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for patients with complex Crohn’s disease
Kiyoshi Maeda, Hisashi Nagahara, Masatsune Shibutani, Tatsunari Fukuoka, Shigetomi Nakao, Hirokazu Yamagami, Noriko Kamata, Kazuya Muguruma, Hiroaki Tanaka, Takahiro Toyokawa, Kosei Hirakawa, Masaichi Ohira
Surgery Today.2018; 48(2): 242. CrossRef
Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy for hemodialysis patients with dialysis-related renal tumors
Kohei Takei, Mutsushi Yamasaki, Satoki Abe, Naoyuki Yamanaka, Shinya Sejiyama, Takahiro Narimatsu, Shinro Hata, Tadamasa Shibuya, Kenichi Hirai, Tadasuke Ando, Toshitaka Shin, Kenichi Mori, Yasuhiro Sumino, Takeo Nomura, Fuminori Sato, Toshiro Terachi, Hi
Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies.2018; 27(3): 153. CrossRef
Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients With Proximal Transverse Colon Cancer With Situs Inversus Totalis: A Case Report
Seung-Seop Yeom, Kyung Hwan Kim, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim, Young Jin Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(6): 322. CrossRef
Robot-Assisted Colectomy for Left-Sided Colon Cancer: Comparison of Reduced-Port and Conventional Multi-Port Robotic Surgery
Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2017; 27(4): 398. CrossRef
Two-port laparoscopic anterior resection through a self-made glove device versus conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparison of short-term surgical results
Hong Zhang, Yunzhi Ling, Jinchun Cong, Mingming Cui, Dingsheng Liu, Chunsheng Chen
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison between the perioperative results of single‐access and conventional laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer
Siripong Sirikurnpiboon
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2016; 9(1): 44. CrossRef
Review of 500 single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery cases - Lessons learned
Deborah S Keller
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(2): 659. CrossRef
Robotic Anterior Resection for Sigmoid Colon Cancer Using Reduced Port Access
Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2016; 59(3): 245. CrossRef
Pfannenstiel laparoendoscopic reduced‐port radical nephrectomy
Mutsushi Yamasaki, Toshitaka Shin, Ryuta Sato, Kenichi Hirai, Tomoko Kan, Hiroyuki Fujinami, Kenichi Mori, Yasuhiro Sumino, Takeo Nomura, Fuminori Sato, Hitoshi Masuda, Junji Yonese, Hiromitsu Mimata
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2016; 9(3): 222. CrossRef
SILS v SILS+1: a Case-Matched Comparison for Colorectal Surgery
Deborah S. Keller, Juan R. Flores-Gonzalez, Jaideep Sandhu, Sergio Ibarra, Nisreen Madhoun, Eric M. Haas
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2015; 19(10): 1875. CrossRef
Reduced Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer
Byung Chun Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(1): 3. CrossRef
Minimally invasive surgery for superior mesenteric artery syndrome: A case report
Si-Yuan Yao
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2015; 21(45): 12970. CrossRef

Predictors of Fecal Incontinence and Related Quality of Life After a Total Mesorectal Excision With Primary Anastomosis for Patients With Rectal Cancer: Marieke S. Walma, Verena N. N. Kornmann, Djamila Boerma, Marnix A. J. de Roos, Henderik L. van Westreenen; Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(1):23-28. Published online February 28, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.1.23

5,066 View
44 Download
38 Web of Science
35 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

After total mesorectal excision (TME) with primary anastomosis for patients with rectal cancer, the quality of life (QoL) may be decreased due to fecal incontinence. This study aimed to identify predictors of fecal incontinence and related QoL.

Methods

Patients who underwent TME with primary anastomosis for rectal cancer between December 2008 and June 2012 completed the fecal incontinence quality of life scale (FIQoL) and Wexner incontinence score. Factors associated with these scores were identified using a linear regression analysis.

Results

A total of 80 patients were included. Multivariate analysis identified a diverting ileostomy (n = 58) as an independent predictor of an unfavorable outcome on the FIQoL subscale coping/behavior (P = 0.041). Ileostomy closure within and after 3 months resulted in median Wexner scores of 5.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 2.5-8.0) and 10.5 (IQR, 6.0-13.8), respectively (P < 0.001). The median FIQoL score was 15.0 (IQR, 13.1-16.0) for stoma closure within 3 months versus 12.0 (IQR, 10.5-13.9) for closure after 3 months (P = 0.001).

Conclusion

A diverting ileostomy is a predictor for an impaired FIQoL after a TME for rectal cancer. Stoma reversal within 3 months showed better outcomes than reversal after 3 months. Patients with a diverting ileostomy should be informed about the impaired QoL, even after stoma closure.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Early diverting stoma closure is feasible and safe: results from a before-and-after study on the implementation of an early closure protocol at a tertiary referral center
L. Blanco Terés, C. Cerdán Santacruz, A. Correa Bonito, L. Delgado Búrdalo, A. Rodríguez Sánchez, E. Bermejo Marcos, J. García Septiem, E. Martín Pérez
Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Factors affecting timing of loop ileostomy closure: a regional centre's experience with 106 patients
Tedman Cheuk‐Yiu Chau, Hung Nguyen, Iain K. Robertson, Xavier Harvey, Brendan Tan, Mitchell Tan, Caroline M. Yang
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2024; 94(1-2): 193. CrossRef
Long-term bowel functional outcomes following anal sphincter-preserving surgery for upper and middle rectal cancer: a single-center longitudinal study
Ahmad Sakr, Seung Yoon Yang, Min Soo Cho, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(1): 27. CrossRef
The Effect of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises on Bowel Evacuation and Quality of Life in Following Intestinal Ostomy Closure
Dilek Aktaş, Sema Koçaşlı, Zehra Göçmen Baykara
Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing.2024; 51(3): 221. CrossRef
Nomogram for predicting the probability of rectal anastomotic re-leakage after stoma closure: a retrospective study
Yuegang Li, Gang Hu, Jinzhu Zhang, Wenlong Qiu, Shiwen Mei, Xishan Wang, Jianqiang Tang
BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Causes and costs of delayed closure of ileostomies in rectal cancer patients in Australasian units
Jon Barnard, Tony Milne, Keith Teo, Maree Weston, Lincoln Israel, Sze‐Lin Peng
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2023; 93(3): 636. CrossRef
One-Year Treatment-Related Side Effects and Quality of Life After Chemoradiotherapy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus
Anna Cecilie Lefèvre, Eva Serup-Hansen, Katrine Smedegaard Storm, Karen Lycke Wind, Camilla Kronborg, Karen-Lise Garm Spindler
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2023; 115(5): 1165. CrossRef
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection with “dog ear” invagination anastomosis for mid and distal rectal cancer a propensity score matched analysis
L. Zhang, Z. Xie, L. Gong, X. Lv
Frontiers in Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Management of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) Following Resection for Rectal Cancer
Harald Rosen, Christian G. Sebesta, Christian Sebesta
Cancers.2023; 15(3): 778. CrossRef
Patient-reported Bowel Function and Bowel-related Quality of Life After Pelvic Radiation for Rectal Adenocarcinoma: The Impact of Radiation Fractionation and Surgical Resection
Michael K. Rooney, Brian De, Kelsey Corrigan, Grace L. Smith, Cullen Taniguchi, Bruce D. Minsky, Ethan B. Ludmir, Eugene J. Koay, Prajnan Das, Albert C. Koong, Oliver Peacock, George Chang, Y. Nancy You, Van K. Morris, Graciela Nogueras-González, Emma B.
Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2023; 22(2): 211. CrossRef
Prolonged diversion after ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis: Is it safe to wait?
Cillian Clancy, Tara M. Connelly, Xue Jia, Jeremy Lipman, Amy L. Lightner, Tracy Hull, Scott R. Steele, Stefan D. Holubar
Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(6): 1187. CrossRef
The Effect of a Temporary Stoma on Long-term Functional Outcomes Following Surgery for Rectal Cancer
Sanne J. Verkuijl, Jara E. Jonker, Edgar J.B. Furnée, Wendy Kelder, Christiaan Hoff, Daniel A. Hess, Fennie Wit, Ronald J. Zijlstra, Monika Trzpis, Paul M.A. Broens
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The impact of prolonged delay to loop ileostomy closure on postoperative morbidity and hospital stay: A retrospective cohort study
Greg A. Turner, Kari A. Clifford, Rossi Holloway, John C. Woodfield, Mark Thompson‐Fawcett
Colorectal Disease.2022; 24(7): 854. CrossRef
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Surgery
Iqra Yasin, Afshan Saeed Usmani, Jibran Mohsin, Rehan Bin Asif, Nazish Kahlid, Aamir Ali Syed
Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Patient-Reported Bowel and Urinary Function in Long-Term Survivors of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus Treated With Definitive Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy And Concurrent Chemotherapy
Brian De, Kelsey L. Corrigan, Michael K. Rooney, Ethan B. Ludmir, Prajnan Das, Grace L. Smith, Cullen M. Taniguchi, Bruce D. Minsky, Eugene J. Koay, Albert Koong, Van K. Morris, Craig A. Messick, Y. Nancy You, George J. Chang, O. Lenaine Westney, Graciela
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2022; 114(1): 78. CrossRef
The Longitudinal Course of Low-anterior Resection Syndrome
Chris Varghese, Cameron I. Wells, Greg O’Grady, Peter Christensen, Ian P. Bissett, Celia Keane
Annals of Surgery.2022; 276(1): 46. CrossRef
The role of colonic motility in low anterior resection syndrome
Chris Varghese, Cameron I. Wells, Ian P. Bissett, Gregory O’Grady, Celia Keane
Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Symptoms of anal incontinence and quality of life: a psychometric study of the Norwegian version of the ICIQ-B amongst hospital outpatients
Susan Saga, Anne Guttormsen Vinsnes, Christine Norton, Gørill Haugan
Archives of Public Health.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of a defunctioning ileostomy and time to stoma closure on bowel function after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
I. Vogel, N. Reeves, P. J. Tanis, W. A. Bemelman, J. Torkington, R. Hompes, J. A. Cornish
Techniques in Coloproctology.2021; 25(7): 751. CrossRef
Loop-ileostomy reversal in a 23-h stay setting is safe with high patient satisfaction
Kevin Afshari, Maziar Nikberg, Kenneth Smedh, Abbas Chabok
Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 56(9): 1126. CrossRef
Low anterior resection syndrome: can it be prevented?
Alfredo Annicchiarico, Jacopo Martellucci, Stefano Solari, Maximilian Scheiterle, Carlo Bergamini, Paolo Prosperi
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(12): 2535. CrossRef
Risk factors for developing anorectal dysfunction after anterior resection
Kevin Afshari, Kenneth Smedh, Philippe Wagner, Abbas Chabok, Maziar Nikberg
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(12): 2697. CrossRef
Impact of temporary ileostomy on long‐term quality of life and bowel function: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
Celia Keane, Puja Sharma, Lance Yuan, Ian Bissett, Greg O'Grady
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2020; 90(5): 687. CrossRef
Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in ovarian cancer patients - A multi-centre comparative cohort study
Felix Harpain, Marlene Kranawetter, Tobias Zott, Ioannis I. Lazaridis, Marc-Olivier Guenin, Marijana Ninkovic, Irmgard E. Kronberger, Ingrid Tapiolas, Eloy Espin Basany, Bernhard Dauser, Friedrich Herbst, Cherry Koh, Anton Stift, Bela Teleky, Alexander Re
International Journal of Surgery.2020; 78: 97. CrossRef
Functional outcomes from a randomized trial of early closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal excision for cancer
C Keane, J Park, S Öberg, A Wedin, D Bock, G O'Grady, I Bissett, J Rosenberg, E Angenete
British Journal of Surgery.2019; 106(5): 645. CrossRef
Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer after primary debulking surgery
Marlene Kranawetter, Beyhan Ataseven, Christoph Grimm, Stephanie Schneider, Stefan Riss, Pier Alesina, Sonia Prader, Martin K. Walz, Felix Harpain, Anton Stift, Florian Heitz, Alexander Reinthaller, Stephan Polterauer, Philipp Harter, Andreas du Bois
Gynecologic Oncology.2019; 154(3): 577. CrossRef
Predictive Factors for Bowel Dysfunction After Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Cross-sectional Study
Youn Young Park, Seung Yoon Yang, Yoon Dae Han, Min Soo Cho, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2019; 62(8): 925. CrossRef
Loop-ileostomy reversal—patient-related characteristics influencing time to closure
Carl Pontus Gustafsson, Ulf Gunnarsson, Ursula Dahlstrand, Ulrik Lindforss
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2018; 33(5): 593. CrossRef
Protocol for a multicentre, dual prospective and retrospective cohort study investigating timing of ileostomy closure after anterior resection for rectal cancer: The CLOSurE of Ileostomy Timing (CLOSE-IT) study
Peter G Vaughan-Shaw, Katherine Gash, Katie Adams, Abigail E Vallance, Sophie A Pilkington, Jared Torkington, Julie A Cornish
BMJ Open.2018; 8(10): e023305. CrossRef
Physiotherapy and Anterior Resection Syndrome (PARiS) trial: feasibility study protocol
Anna Powell-Chandler, Buddug Rees, Carole Broad, Jared Torkington, Claire O’Neill, Julie A Cornish
BMJ Open.2018; 8(6): e021855. CrossRef
Fecal incontinence - Challenges and solutions
Nallely Saldana Ruiz, Andreas M Kaiser
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2017; 23(1): 11. CrossRef
Is the interval from surgery to ileostomy closure a risk factor for low anterior resection syndrome?
R. M. Jiménez‐Rodríguez, J. J. Segura‐Sampedro, I. Rivero‐Belenchón, J. M. Díaz Pavón, A. M. García Cabrera, J. M. Vazquez Monchul, J. Padillo, F. de la Portilla
Colorectal Disease.2017; 19(5): 485. CrossRef
Transanal endoscopic operation for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy
José Joaquim Ribeiro da Rocha, Mário Vinícius Angelete Alvarez Bernardes, Marley Ribeiro Feitosa, Camila Perazzoli, Vanessa Foresto Machado, Fernanda Maris Peria, Harley Francisco de Oliveira, Omar Feres
Acta Cirurgica Brasileira.2016; 31(suppl 1): 29. CrossRef
Low anterior resection syndrome: a survey of the members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC), and the Spanish Society of Coloproctology (AECP)
Luis Miguel Jimenez-Gomez, Eloy Espin-Basany, Marc Marti-Gallostra, Jose Luis Sanchez-Garcia, Francesc Vallribera-Valls, Manuel Armengol-Carrasco
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2016; 31(4): 813. CrossRef
Can the Timing of Ileostomy Reversal Influence Functional Outcome?
Chang-Nam Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(1): 5. CrossRef

Clinical Trial on the Incidence of Wound Infection and Patient Satisfaction After Stoma Closure: Comparison of Two Skin Closure Techniques: Sang Il Yoon, Sun Mi Bae, Hwan Namgung, Dong Guk Park; Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(1):29-33. Published online February 28, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.1.29

4,598 View
60 Download
15 Web of Science
14 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common complications that can occur after stoma closure. Reports have described differences in the incidence of wound infection depending on the skin closure technique, but there is no consensus on the ideal closure technique for a stoma wound. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of SSI and the patient satisfaction between a circumferential purse-string approximation (CPA) and a primary linear closure (PC) of a stoma wound.

Methods

This prospective nonrandomized trial enrolled 48 patients who underwent a stoma closure from February 2010 to October 2013. Patients were divided into two groups according to the stoma closing technique: the CPA group (n = 34) and the PC group (n = 14). The incidences of SSI for the two groups were compared, and the patients' satisfaction with the stoma closure was determined by using a questionnaire.

Results

SSI occurred in 3 of 48 patients (6.3%) and was more frequent in the PC group than in the CPA group (3/14 [21.4%] vs. 0/34 [0%], P = 0.021). Time to complete healing after stoma closure in the CPA group was 32 days (range, 14-61 days). Patients in the CPA group were more satisfied with the resulting wound scar (P = 0.043).

Conclusion

After stoma closure, CPA was associated with a significantly lower incidence of wound infection and greater patient satisfaction compared to PC. However, with the CPA technique, the time to heal is longer than it is with PC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Clinical Benefits of Reducing Dead Space Using a Closed Suction Drain and Subcutaneous Large-bite Buried Suture Technique to Prevent Superficial Surgical-site Infections Following Primary Closure of a Diverting Stoma
Yusuke Ohara, Yohei Owada, Jaejeong Kim, Shoko Moue, Yoshimasa Akashi, Koichi Ogawa, Kazuhiro Takahashi, Osamu Shimomura, Kinji Furuya, Shinji Hashimoto, Tsuyoshi Enomoto, Tatsuya Oda
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2024; 8(2): 70. CrossRef
Comparison of purse-string technique vs linear suture for skin closure after ileostomy reversal. A randomized controlled trial
Filippo Carannante, Gianluca Costa, Valentina Miacci, Gianfranco Bianco, Gianluca Masciana, Sara Lauricella, Marco Caricato, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Purse-string versus linear closure of the skin wound following stoma reversal: A meta-analysis with RCT and systematic review
Jinlong Luo, Dan Liu, Junmei Wu, Huaiwu Jiang, Jin Chen, Hua Yang, Lie Yang
Medicine.2024; 103(35): e39477. CrossRef
Effectiveness of negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwelling after stoma closure: a retrospective and propensity score matching analysis
Yoshinori Yane, Jin-ichi Hida, Yasutaka Chiba, Yusuke Makutani, Hokuto Ushijima, Yasumasa Yoshioka, Masayoshi Iwamoto, Toshiaki Wada, Koji Daito, Tadao Tokoro, Kazuki Ueda, Junichiro Kawamura
Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for Ostomy Surgery
Bradley R. Davis, Michael A. Valente, Joel E. Goldberg, Amy L. Lightner, Daniel L. Feingold, Ian M. Paquette
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2022; 65(10): 1173. CrossRef
The technique for less infectious and earlier healing of stoma closure wound: negative pressure wound therapy with instillation and dwelling followed by primary closure
Yoshinori Yane, Jin-ichi Hida, Yusuke Makutani, Hokuto Ushijima, Yasumasa Yoshioka, Masayoshi Iwamoto, Toshiaki Wada, Koji Daito, Tadao Tokoro, Kazuki Ueda, Junichiro Kawamura
BMC Surgery.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Symptoms and Care Satisfaction in Patients Who Underwent Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery
Tuğçe BOZKURT
Clinical and Experimental Health Sciences.2021; 11(3): 481. CrossRef
Evidence-based adoption of purse-string skin closure for stoma wounds
Nilotpal Behuria, Jayant Kumar Banerjee, Sita Ram Ghosh, Shrirang Vasant Kulkarni, Ramanathan Saranga Bharathi
Medical Journal Armed Forces India.2020; 76(2): 185. CrossRef
Gunsight Procedure Versus the Purse-String Procedure for Closing Wounds After Stoma Reversal: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial
Jia Gang Han, Hong Wei Yao, Jian Ping Zhou, Hong Zhang, Gui Ying Wang, Zhan Long Shen, Jian Feng Gong, Zhen Jun Wang
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2020; 63(10): 1411. CrossRef
Purse-string approximation vs. primary closure with a drain for stoma reversal surgery: results of a randomized clinical trial
Kunihiko Amamo, Hideyuki Ishida, Kensuke Kumamoto, Norimichi Okada, Satoshi Hatano, Noriyasu Chika, Yusuke Tajima, Tomonori Ohsawa, Masaru Yokoyama, Keiichiro Ishibashi, Erito Mochiki
Surgery Today.2019; 49(3): 231. CrossRef
Purse-string vs. linear skin closure at loop ileostomy reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis
M. Gachabayov, H. Lee, A. Chudner, A. Dyatlov, N. Zhang, R. Bergamaschi
Techniques in Coloproctology.2019; 23(3): 207. CrossRef
Incisional hernia following closure of loop ileostomy: The main predictor is the patient, not the surgeon
A.J. Brook, S.D. Mansfield, I.R. Daniels, N.J. Smart
The Surgeon.2018; 16(1): 20. CrossRef
Purse-string skin closure versus linear skin closure techniques in stoma closure: a comprehensive meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomised trials
Shahab Hajibandeh, Shahin Hajibandeh, Andrew Kennedy-Dalby, Sheik Rehman, Reza Arsalani Zadeh
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2018; 33(10): 1319. CrossRef
Effect of a Purse-String Approximation Following Stoma Takedown on Wound Infection and Satisfaction
In Ja Park
Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(1): 7. CrossRef

Case Reports

Late Presentation of Anal Canal Duplication in Adults: A Series of Four Rare Cases: Rezvan Mirzaei, Bahar Mahjubi, Mina Alvandipoor, Mohammad Yasin Karami; Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(1):34-36. Published online February 28, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.1.34

5,483 View
45 Download
9 Web of Science
11 Citations

Abstract PDF

Anal canal duplication (ACD) is a very rare condition, especially in adults. Four cases in adults are reported. In three cases, the orifice of duplication was located behind the native anus, and in one case, it was located anteriorly. In all cases, no communication between the anal canal and the tract of duplication was noted. Complete removals of the duplications were done through a perineal approach. Histology showed fibro-muscular tissue lined with a squamous epithelium. The postoperative courses were uneventful.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Anal canal duplication with heterotopic gastric mucosa and anal stenosis: first case report and literature review
Chen Liu, Chuanzhen Xu, Xiaoliang Xu, Yan Zhang, Lei Geng, Yanhui Mei, Hong Ji, Tingliang Fu, Guojian Ding
Frontiers in Pediatrics.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Cystic lesions of the retrorectal space
Ian S Brown, Anna Sokolova, Christophe Rosty, Rondell P Graham
Histopathology.2023; 82(2): 232. CrossRef
Anal Canal Duplication in a 25-Year-Old Female Patient
Mauricio Gutierrez-Alvarez, Jorge Leal, Kevin Fuentes, Fernando Sotelo, Irving Fuentes, Daniel Camacho
Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Anal Canal Duplication Mimicking Recurrent Abscess: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Dandan Li, Shuaibin Liu, Jiexiong Feng, Jixin Yang
Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Early Diagnosis of Anal Canal Duplication: The Importance of a Physical Examination
Ioannis Karamatzanis, Panagiota Kosmidou, Stavros Harmanis, Ioannis Karamatzanis, Giorgos Harmanis
Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Case Report: Anal canal duplication associated with anorectal stenosis—A rare presentation
Zhen Zheng, Dong Xiao, Junxiang Wang, Haozhong Xu, Jianxiong Mao, Xiuliang Wang
Frontiers in Pediatrics.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Anal Canal Duplication in an Adult Female—Case Report and Pathology Guiding
Tudor Mateescu, Cristi Tarta, Paul Stanciu, Alis Dema, Fulger Lazar
Medicina.2021; 57(11): 1205. CrossRef
Anal duplication: is surgery indicated? A report of three cases and review of the literature
A. C. Trecartin, A. Peña, M. Lovell, J. Bruny, C. Mueller, M. Urquidi, Andrea Bischoff
Pediatric Surgery International.2019; 35(9): 971. CrossRef
Anal Canal Duplication Associated with Presacral Cyst in an Adult
Takayuki Toyonaga, Hiromitsu Matsuda, Ryuichi Mibu, Yohei Tominaga, Keiji Hirata, Masafumi Takeyoshi, Masazumi Tsuneyoshi
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2018; 2(1): 31. CrossRef
Anal canal duplication presenting with abscess formation
Shohei Honda, Masashi Minato, Hisayuki Miyagi, Hiromi Okada, Akinobu Taketomi
Pediatrics International.2017; 59(4): 500. CrossRef
Anal canal duplication and triplication: a rare entity with different presentations
P. Palazon, V. Julia, L. Saura, I. de Haro, M. Bejarano, C. Rovira, X. Tarrado
Pediatric Surgery International.2017; 33(5): 609. CrossRef

Epidermoid Cyst of the Cecum: Jae-Young Park, Youn Wha Kim, Kil Yeon Lee, Ji-Youn Sung; Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(1):37-39. Published online February 28, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.1.37

4,383 View
44 Download
5 Web of Science
7 Citations

Abstract PDF

An epidermoid cyst of the cecum is extremely rare; only eight cases have been reported in the literature. A 63-year-old woman was admitted to Kyung Hee University Medical Center with a colonic mass that had been discovered incidentally during a regular health check-up. The radiographic impression was that this mass was a gastrointestinal stromal tumor. During surgery, an exophytic mass in the cecal wall was resected by using an ileocecectomy. Based on the macroscopic and the microscopic findings, this case was identified as an epidermoid cyst of the cecal wall. We report this case to discuss the origin of this entity and the unusual nature of our case.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Epidermoid Cyst in the Appendix: A Rare Entity
Yu Ya Nway, Raj Shah, Jignesh Parikh, Ernesto Robalino Gonzaga
Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Epidermoid cyst of the cecum resected by single-incision laparoscopic colectomy: a case report
Tetsuro Tominaga, Takashi Nonaka, Akiko Fukuda, Masaaki Moriyama, Shosaburo Oyama, Mitsuhisa Ishii, Terumitsu Sawai, Nozomi Ueki, Takeshi Nagayasu
Surgical Case Reports.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
A rare case of epidermoid cyst of the cecum
Giovanni Tonelli, Emanuele Soricelli, Margherita Vannucchi, Marcello Lucchese
Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 14(6): 1746. CrossRef
Cecal epidermoid cyst: a neonatal case with clinicopathological consideration
Joo-Young Na, Soo-Hong Kim, Narae Lee
BMC Pediatrics.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Multifocal Epidermoid Cysts Accompanied with Ruminal Tympany in a 36-Month-Old Holstein Cow
Sinya TOKUTAKE, Satomi DOAI, Daiki KAWASHIMA, Hirotaka MORITA, Tomoyuki SHIBAHARA
Journal of the Japan Veterinary Medical Association.2021; 74(9): 558. CrossRef
A Case of Epidermoid Cyst of the Cecum Treated by Laparoscopic Resection
Ryoji Kaizaki, Toru Inoue, Satoshi Takatsuka, Tadashi Tsukamoto
Nihon Gekakei Rengo Gakkaishi (Journal of Japanese College of Surgeons).2020; 45(6): 800. CrossRef
An Unusual Cecal Mass in an Otherwise Healthy Young Woman
Lisa Lutz, Philipp Holzner, Hannes Neeff
Gastroenterology.2016; 150(5): e5. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Previous issues