Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Previous issues

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles > Previous issues
9 Previous issues
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Authors
Funded articles
Volume 34(2); April 2018
Prev issue Next issue
Editorial
A Common Complication After an Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis With a Loop Ileostomy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Small Bowel Obstruction
Chang-Nam Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(2):57-58.   Published online April 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.10.11
  • 4,666 View
  • 110 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Ileal-anal pouches: A review of its history, indications, and complications
    Kheng-Seong Ng, Simon Joseph Gonsalves, Peter Michael Sagar
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 25(31): 4320.     CrossRef
Review
Essential Anatomy of the Anorectum for Colorectal Surgeons Focused on the Gross Anatomy and Histologic Findings
Jong Min Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(2):59-71.   Published online April 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.12.15
  • 23,930 View
  • 961 Download
  • 30 Web of Science
  • 34 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
The anorectum is a region with a very complex structure, and surgery for benign or malignant disease of the anorectum is impossible without accurate anatomical knowledge. The conjoined longitudinal muscle consists of smooth muscle from the longitudinal muscle of the rectum and the striate muscle from the levator ani and helps maintain continence; the rectourethralis muscle is connected directly to the conjoined longitudinal muscle at the top of the external anal sphincter. Preserving the rectourethralis muscle without damage to the carvernous nerve or veins passing through it when the abdominoperineal resection is implemented is important. The mesorectal fascia is a multi-layered membrane that surrounds the mesorectum. Because the autonomic nerves also pass between the mesorectal fascia and the parietal fascia, a sharp pelvic dissection must be made along the anatomic fascial plane. With the development of pelvic structure anatomy, we can understand better how we can remove the tumor and the surrounding metastatic lymph nodes without damaging the neural structure. However, because the anorectal anatomy is not yet fully understood, we hope that additional studies of anatomy will enable anorectal surgery to be performed based on complete anatomical knowledge.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Management of Perianal Fistulizing Crohn’s Disease
    Arshdeep Singh, Vandana Midha, Gursimran Singh Kochhar, Bo Shen, Ajit Sood
    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2024; 30(9): 1579.     CrossRef
  • Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
    Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
    The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • Laser hemorrhoidoplasty procedure versus harmonic scalpel hemorrhoidectomy: a comparative study for the treatment of grades III and IV hemorrhoids
    Ehab Loutfy, Hatem Elgohary, Mahmoud E. Elkashlan, Mohamed G. Abdelrahman, Wael Omar
    The Egyptian Journal of Surgery.2024; 43(2): 572.     CrossRef
  • Anatomic Basis of Rectal Cancer Staging: Clarifying Controversies and Misconceptions
    Harmeet Kaur, Helena Gabriel, Muhammad O. Awiwi, Ekta Maheshwari, Camila Lopes Vendrami, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Melissa W. Taggart, Michael Magnetta, Linda C. Kelahan, Sonia Lee
    RadioGraphics.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Anal carcinoma - exploring the epidemiology, risk factors, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment
    Kevan J English
    World Journal of Experimental Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Essential knowledge and technical tips for total mesorectal excision and related procedures for rectal cancer
    Min Soo Cho, Hyeon Woo Bae, Nam Kyu Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 384.     CrossRef
  • MRI anatomy of the rectum: key concepts important for rectal cancer staging and treatment planning
    Nino Bogveradze, Petur Snaebjornsson, Brechtje A. Grotenhuis, Baukelien van Triest, Max J. Lahaye, Monique Maas, Geerard L. Beets, Regina G. H. Beets-Tan, Doenja M. J. Lambregts
    Insights into Imaging.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Non-Healing Perianal Fistulas: A Clinical Model of Tissue Senescence Impairing Both Tissue Fibrosis and Regenerative Potential
    Jason Llaneras, Caitlyn C. Belza, Samuel Eisenstein, Marek K. Dobke
    Biomedicines.2023; 11(2): 537.     CrossRef
  • Anorectal Anatomy Quiz: Test Your Knowledge
    Megan Obi, Scott R. Steele
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 27(6): 1238.     CrossRef
  • Technique, sedation, and clinical outcome of endoscopic submucosal dissection for rectal tumor with involvement of dentate line: A retrospective cohort study
    Yoon Kyoo Noh, Jun Lee, Seong Jung Kim
    Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(6): 365.     CrossRef
  • Characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of anal versus rectal squamous cell carcinoma, a retrospective cohort study
    Sameh Hany Emile, Nir Horesh, Zoe Garoufalia, Rachel Gefen, Peige Zhou, Victor Strassmann, Steven D. Wexner
    Surgery.2023; 174(3): 508.     CrossRef
  • Low Rectal Cancers at Initial Staging MRI
    Matthew H. Lee, David H. Kim
    RadioGraphics.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Optimal Surgical techniques for curative resection of the Rectal cancer
    Hyeon Woo Bae, Nam Kyu Kim
    Formosan Journal of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robot-assisted anorectal pull-through for anorectal malformations with rectourethral and rectovesical fistula: feasibility and short-term outcome
    Xiaopan Chang, Guoqing Cao, Jiarui Pu, Shuai Li, Xi Zhang, Shao-tao Tang
    Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(3): 1910.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic repair of coccygeal hernia with biological mesh following partial coccygectomy
    Morgan E. Jones, Matthew Stokes, Satish K. Warrier
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2022; 92(4): 912.     CrossRef
  • HPV-driven anal neoplasia: review and recent developments
    Naziheh Assarzadegan, Eugene Brooks, Lysandra Voltaggio
    Pathology.2022; 54(2): 184.     CrossRef
  • Anatomy of the vesicovaginal fascia and its relation to branches of the inferior hypogastric plexus
    Douglas Stupart, Kylie Pickles, Chris Briggs
    Clinical Anatomy.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Embryology and anatomy of anorectal malformations
    Yuichiro Miyake, Geoffrey J. Lane, Atsuyuki Yamataka
    Seminars in Pediatric Surgery.2022; 31(6): 151226.     CrossRef
  • A new membrane anatomy-oriented classification of radical surgery for rectal cancer
    Jiaqi Wang, Hailong Liu, Ajian Li, Huihong Jiang, Yun Pan, Xin Chen, Lu Yin, Moubin Lin
    Gastroenterology Report.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Essential anatomy for total mesorectal excision and lateral lymph node dissection, in both trans-abdominal and trans-anal perspective
    Tak Lit Derek Fung, Yuichiro Tsukada, Masaaki Ito
    The Surgeon.2021; 19(6): e462.     CrossRef
  • Optimal Complete Rectum Mobilization Focused on the Anatomy of the Pelvic Fascia and Autonomic Nerves: 30 Years of Experience at Severance Hospital
    Nam Kyu Kim, Ho Seung Kim, Mohmmed Alessa, Radwan Torky
    Yonsei Medical Journal.2021; 62(3): 187.     CrossRef
  • Understanding the physiology of human defaecation and disorders of continence and evacuation
    Paul T. Heitmann, Paul F. Vollebregt, Charles H. Knowles, Peter J. Lunniss, Phil G. Dinning, S. Mark Scott
    Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2021; 18(11): 751.     CrossRef
  • COMPERATIVE STRUCTURE OF MUCOSA COAT OF THE PIG`S AND THE HUMAN`S RECTUM
    Roman О. Plakhotnyi, Іryna V. Кerechanyn, Larysa Ya. Fedoniuk, Nataliia V. Kovalchuk, Oksana V. Dehtiariova, Gagandeep Singh
    Wiadomości Lekarskie.2021; 74(7): 1718.     CrossRef
  • Robotic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Technical Controversies and a Systematic Review on the Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes
    Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Seon Hahn Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 351.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Treatment of Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: Updates
    Cristopher Varela, Nam Kyu Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 395.     CrossRef
  • Functional outcomes after sphincter-preserving surgeries for low-lying rectal cancer: A review
    Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Precision and Future Medicine.2021; 5(4): 164.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Impact of Ventral Versus Dorsal Tumor Location After Total Mesorectal Excision of Rectal Cancer
    Clemens Franz, Hans M. Lang, Omid Ghamarnejad, Elias Khajeh, Arianeb Mehrabi, Alexis Ulrich, Martin Schneider, Markus W. Büchler, Yakup Kulu
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2020; 27(2): 430.     CrossRef
  • Physiological 18F-FDG uptake in the normal adult anal canal: evaluation by PET/CT
    Yankel Sena, Shunro Matsumoto, Christopher Silman, Kenichiro Otsuka, Takashige Kiyota
    Annals of Nuclear Medicine.2020; 34(8): 538.     CrossRef
  • Skip lesions in perianal mucinous adenocarcinoma
    Nirali Shah, Michael Gates, Imran Saeed
    World Journal of Colorectal Surgery.2020; 9(2): 32.     CrossRef
  • Large intestine embryogenesis: Molecular pathways and related disorders (Review)
    Antonios Kostouros, Ioannis Koliarakis, Konstantinos Natsis, Demetrios Spandidos, Aristidis Tsatsakis, John Tsiaoussis
    International Journal of Molecular Medicine.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • MRI of rectal cancer—relevant anatomy and staging key points
    Inês Santiago, Nuno Figueiredo, Oriol Parés, Celso Matos
    Insights into Imaging.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • High Prevalence of Slow Transit Constipation in Patients With Gastroparesis
    Thomas A Zikos, Afrin N Kamal, Leila Neshatian, George Triadafilopoulos, John O Clarke, Monica Nandwani, Linda A Nguyen
    Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility.2019; 25(2): 267.     CrossRef
  • Rectal cancer lexicon: consensus statement from the society of abdominal radiology rectal & anal cancer disease-focused panel
    Thomas A. Hope, Marc J. Gollub, Supreeta Arya, David D. B. Bates, Dhakshinamoorthy Ganeshan, Mukesh Harisinghani, Kartik S. Jhaveri, Zahra Kassam, David H. Kim, Elena Korngold, Neeraj Lalwani, Courtney C. Moreno, Stephanie Nougaret, Viktoriya Paroder, Raj
    Abdominal Radiology.2019; 44(11): 3508.     CrossRef
  • Multimodality post proctologic surgery pain control
    Afshin Iranpour, Ramakrishna Boddapati
    Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2019; 30(4): 100701.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Trephine Transverse Colostomy Is Effective for Patients Who Have Previously Undergone Rectal Surgery
Seung-Seop Yeom, Chan Wook Kim, Sung Woo Jung, Se Heon Oh, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(2):72-77.   Published online April 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.09.29
  • 5,792 View
  • 144 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Colostomy creation is an essential procedure for colorectal surgeons, but the preferred method of colostomy varies by surgeon. We compared the outcomes of trephine colostomy creation with open those for the (laparotomy) and laparoscopic methods and evaluated appropriate indications for a trephine colostomy and the advantages of the technique.
Methods
We retrospectively evaluated 263 patients who had undergone colostomy creation by trephine, open and laparoscopic approaches between April 2006 and March 2016. We compared the clinical features and the operative and postoperative outcomes according to the approach used for stoma creation.
Results
One hundred sixty-three patients (62%) underwent colostomy surgery for obstructive causes and 100 (38%) for fistulous problems. The mean operative time was significantly shorter with the trephine approach (trephine, 46.0 ± 1.9 minutes; open, 78.7 ± 3.9 minutes; laparoscopic, 63.5 ± 5.0 minutes; P < 0.001), as was the time to flatus (1.8 ± 0.1 days, 2.1 ± 0.1 days, 2.2 ± 0.3 days, P = 0.025). Postoperative complications (<30 days) were not different among the 3 approaches (trephine, 4.3%; open, 1.2%; laparoscopic, 0%; P = 0.828). In patients who underwent rectal surgery, a trephine colostomy was feasible for a diversion colostomy (P < 0.001).
Conclusion
The trephine colostomy is safe and can be implemented quickly in various situations, and compared to other colostomy procedures, the patient’s recovery is faster. Previous laparotomy history was not a contraindication for a trephine colostomy, and a trephine transverse colostomy is feasible for patients who have undergone previous rectal surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Non-operative management of gallstone sigmoid ileus in a patient with a prostatic cancer
    Ahmed M AlMuhsin, Abdulaziz Bazuhair, Omar AlKhlaiwy, Rami O Abu Hajar, Thabit Alotaibi
    Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of blowhole colostomy and loop ostomy for palliation of acute malignant colonic obstruction
    Yongjun Park, Dong Uk Choi, Hyung Ook Kim, Yong Bog Kim, Chungki Min, Jung Tack Son, Sung Ryol Lee, Kyung Uk Jung, Hungdai Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(4): 319.     CrossRef
  • Minimally invasive colostomy with endoscopy as a novel technique for creation of a trephine stoma
    Teppei Kamada, Hironori Ohdaira, Junji Takahashi, Wataru Kai, Keigo Nakashima, Yuichi Nakaseko, Norihiko Suzuki, Masashi Yoshida, Yutaka Suzuki
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
Clinical Etiology of Hypermetabolic Pelvic Lesions in Postoperative Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Patients With Rectal and Sigmoid Cancer
Yun Hee Kang, Eunji Han, Geon Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(2):78-82.   Published online April 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.09.21
  • 4,903 View
  • 75 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to present various clinical etiologies of hypermetabolic pelvic lesions on postoperative positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images for patients with rectal and sigmoid cancer.
Methods
Postoperative PET/CT images for patients with rectal and sigmoid cancer were retrospectively reviewed to identify hypermetabolic pelvic lesions. Positive findings were detected in 70 PET/CT images from 45 patients; 2 patients who were lost to follow-up were excluded. All PET findings were analyzed in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT.
Results
A total of 43 patients were classified into 2 groups: patients with a malignancy including local recurrence (n = 30) and patients with other benign lesions (n = 13). Malignant lesions such as a local recurrent tumor, peritoneal carcinomatosis, and incidental uterine malignancy, as well as various benign lesions such as an anastomotic sinus, fistula, abscess, reactive lymph node, and normal ovary, were observed.
Conclusion
PET/CT performed during postoperative surveillance of rectal and sigmoid colon cancer showed increased fluorodeoxyglucose uptake not only in local recurrence, but also in benign pelvic etiologies. Therefore, physicians need to be cautious about the broad clinical spectrum of hypermetabolic pelvic lesions when interpreting images.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Variants and Pitfalls in PET/CT Imaging of Gastrointestinal Cancers
    Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam, Viktoriya Paroder, Heiko Schöder
    Seminars in Nuclear Medicine.2021; 51(5): 485.     CrossRef
Long-term Outcome of a Fissurectomy: A Prospective Single-Arm Study of 50 Operations out of 349 Initial Patients
Jean-David Zeitoun, Pierre Blanchard, Nadia Fathallah, Paul Benfredj, Nicolas Lemarchand, Vincent de Parades
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(2):83-87.   Published online April 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.06.12
  • 12,309 View
  • 171 Download
  • 19 Web of Science
  • 19 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The surgical standard of care for patients with chronic anal fissure is still disputed. We aimed to assess the natural course of idiopathic anal fissure and the long-term outcome of a fissurectomy as a surgical treatment.
Methods
All consecutive patients referred to a single expert practitioner in a tertiary centre were primarily included. A fissurectomy was proposed in cases of refractory symptoms after 4 to 6 weeks of standard medical management. Only patients with idiopathic and noninfected anal fissures were included in this second subsample to undergo surgery. Conventional postoperative management was prescribed for all patients who had undergone surgery. The main outcome measures were the success rate (defined as a combination of wound healing and relief of pain) and postoperative anal continence.
Results
Three hundred forty-nine patients were primarily recruited. Fifty patients finally underwent surgery for an idiopathic and noninfected fissure. Among them, 47 (94%) were cured at the end of primary follow-up, and 44 of the 47 (93.6%) could be confirmed as being sustainably cured in the longer-term follow-up. The mean time of complete healing was 10.3 weeks (range, 5.7–36.4 weeks). All patients were free of pain at weeks 42. The continence score after surgery was not statistically different from the preoperative score.
Conclusion
A fissurectomy for the treatment of patients with an idiopathic noninfected fissure is associated with rapid pain relief and a high success rate even though complete healing may often be delayed. Moreover, it appears to have no adverse effect on continence.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Belgian consensus guideline on the management of anal fissures
    P Roelandt, G Bislenghi, G Coremans, D De Looze, M.A. Denis, H De Schepper, P Dewint, J Geldof, I Gijsen, N Komen, H Ruymbeke, J Stijns, M Surmont, D Van de Putte, S Van den Broeck, B Van Geluwe, J Wyndaele
    Acta Gastro Enterologica Belgica.2024; 87(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • Use of Botulinum Toxin Injections for the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: Results From an American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Survey
    Daniel J. Borsuk, Adam Studniarek, John J. Park, Slawomir J. Marecik, Anders Mellgren, Kunal Kochar
    The American Surgeon.2023; 89(3): 346.     CrossRef
  • New Findings at the Internal Anal Sphincter on Cadaveric Dissection and Review of Sphincter-Related Surgery in a Newer Prospective
    Aswini Kumar Pujahari
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2023; 85(3): 585.     CrossRef
  • Pelvic floor physical therapy in patients with chronic anal fissure: long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial
    Daniëlle A. van Reijn-Baggen, Henk W. Elzevier, H. Putter, Rob C. M. Pelger, Ingrid J. M. Han-Geurts
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Fissurectomy with mucosal advancement flap anoplasty: The end of a dogma?
    M. Skoufou, J.H. Lefèvre, A. Fels, N. Fathallah, P. Benfredj, V. de Parades
    Journal of Visceral Surgery.2023; 160(5): 330.     CrossRef
  • Fissurectomy versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures: no advantages in terms of post-operative incontinence
    Roberta Tutino, Casimiro Nigro, Flavia Paternostro, Rosa Federico, Giacomo Lo Secco, Gaetano Gallo, Mauro Santarelli, Gianfranco Cocorullo, Sebastiano Bonventre
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(10): 885.     CrossRef
  • The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-proctology (SIUCP: Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of anal fissure
    Antonio Brillantino, Adolfo Renzi, Pasquale Talento, Francesca Iacobellis, Luigi Brusciano, Luigi Monaco, Domenico Izzo, Alfredo Giordano, Michele Pinto, Corrado Fantini, Marcello Gasparrini, Michele Schiano Di Visconte, Francesca Milazzo, Giovanni Ferrer
    BMC Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • La fissurectomie avec anoplastie muqueuse : la fin d’un dogme ?
    Maria Skoufou, Jérémie H. Lefèvre, Audrey Fels, Nadia Fathallah, Paul Benfredj, Vincent de Parades
    Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale.2023; 160(5): 363.     CrossRef
  • Modified open posterior internal sphincterotomy with sliding skin graft for chronic anal fissure and anal stenosis: Low recurrence rate and no serious faecal incontinence postoperative complication
    Y. Iida, K. Honda, R. Iida, H. Saitou, Y. Munemoto, A. Tanaka, H. Tanaka
    Journal of Visceral Surgery.2022; 159(4): 267.     CrossRef
  • Sphinctérotomie interne postérieure modifiée avec un lambeau cutané pour fissure anale et sténose anale : peu de récidives et d’incontinence anale
    Y. Iida, K. Honda, R. Iida, H. Saitou, Y. Munemoto, A. Tanaka, H. Tanaka
    Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale.2022; 159(4): 283.     CrossRef
  • Injection of botulinum toxin significantly increases efficiency of fissurectomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures
    Philip Roelandt, Georges Coremans, Jan Wyndaele
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(2): 309.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Trial Combining Botulinum Toxin A Injection and Fissurectomy for Chronic Anal Fissure: A Dose-Dependent Study
    Nuha Alsaleh, Abdullah I. Aljunaydil, Gaida A. Aljamili
    Journal of Coloproctology.2022; 42(02): 167.     CrossRef
  • Fisurectomy and anoplasty with botulinum toxin injection in patients with chronic anal posterior fissure with hypertonia: a long-term evaluation
    Beatrice D’Orazio, Girolamo Geraci, Guido Martorana, Carmelo Sciumé, Giovanni Corbo, Gaetano Di Vita
    Updates in Surgery.2021; 73(4): 1575.     CrossRef
  • The comparison between the medical and the surgical management of chronic anal fissures
    Navneet Mishra, Kamal Kishore Parmar, Tanweerul Huda
    Journal of Clinical and Investigative Surgery.2021; 6(1): 11.     CrossRef
  • Anocutaneous advancement flap provides a quicker cure than fissurectomy in surgical treatment for chronic anal fissure—a retrospective, observational study
    Edgar Hancke, Katrin Suchan, Knut Voelke
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2021; 406(8): 2861.     CrossRef
  • Fissurectomy Versus Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy in the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissure: A Randomized Control Trial
    Bipin Kishore Bara, Sujit Kumar Mohanty, Satya Narayan Behera, Ashok Kumar Sahoo, Santanu Kumar Swain
    Cureus.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Botulinum toxin associated with fissurectomy and anoplasty for hypertonic chronic anal fissure: A case-control study
    Beatrice D'Orazio, Girolamo Geraci, Fausto Famà, Gloria Terranova, Gaetano Di Vita
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2021; 9(32): 9722.     CrossRef
  • Scanner-Assisted CO2 Laser Fissurectomy: A Pilot Study
    Iacopo Giani, Tommaso Cioppa, Chiara Linari, Filippo Caminati, Paolo Dreoni, Gianni Rossi, Cinzia Tanda, Giuseppina Talamo, Federico Bettazzi, Alessandra Aprile, Silvia Grassi, Antonella Pede, Luca Giannoni, Claudio Elbetti
    Frontiers in Surgery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Fissurectomy combined with botulinum toxin A: a review of short- and long-term efficacy of this treatment strategy for chronic anal fissure; a consecutive proposal of a treatment algorithm for chronic anal fissure
    M. Trzpis, J. M. Klaase, R. H. Koop, P. M. A. Broens
    coloproctology.2020; 42(5): 400.     CrossRef
Association Between c-Met and Lymphangiogenic Factors in Patients With Colorectal Cancer
Han Jo Kim, Moo-Jun Baek, Dong Hyun Kang, Sang-Cheol Lee, Sang Byung Bae, Kyu Taek Lee, Namsu Lee, Hyungjoo Kim, Dongjun Jeong, Tae Sung Ahn, Moon Soo Lee, Dae Sik Hong, Jong-Ho Won
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(2):88-93.   Published online April 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.10.10
  • 5,253 View
  • 111 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Animal models show a strong relationship between lymphangiogenesis and lymph node metastasis. However, the clinical significance of lymphangiogenesis in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the association between c-Met and lymphangiogenic factors and to elucidate the prognostic significance of c-Met in patients with CRC.
Methods
A total of 379 tissue samples were obtained from surgically resected specimens from patients with CRC at Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital between January 2002 and December 2010. The expressions of c-Met, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C, VEGF-D, VEGF receptor (VEGFR)-3, and podoplanin were examined using immunohistochemistry. The expression of c-Met and clinical factors were analyzed.
Results
Of the 379 tissues, 301 (79.4%) had c-Met expression. High expression of c-Met in tumor cells was significantly associated with high expression of VEGF-C (P < 0.001) and VEGFR-3 (P = 0.001). However, no statistically significant association with podoplanin (P = 0.587) or VEGF-D (P = 0.096) was found. Of the 103 evaluable patients, expression of c-Met in tumor cells was significantly associated with advanced clinical stage (P = 0.020), positive lymph node status (P = 0.038), and high expression of VEGF-C (P = 0.020). However, no statistically significant association with podoplanin (P = 0.518), VEGFR-3 (P = 0.085), VEGF-D (P = 0.203), or overall survival (P = 0.360) was found.
Conclusion
Our results provide indirect evidence for an association and possible regulatory link of c-Met with the lymphangiogenic markers, but c-Met expression in patients with CRC is not a prognostic indicator for overall survival.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Expression Profile of Microenvironmental Factors in the Interface Zone of Colorectal Cancer: Histological-Stromal Biomarkers and Cancer Cell-Cancer-Associated Fibroblast-Related Proteins Combined for the Assessment of Tumor Progression
    Ricella Souza da Silva, Eduardo M. Queiroga, Cynthia de Toledo Osório, Karin S. Cunha, Fabiana P. Neves, Julieth P. Andrade, Eliane P. Dias
    Pathobiology.2024; 91(2): 99.     CrossRef
  • Recent progress in the imaging of c‐Met aberrant cancers with positron emission tomography
    Giuseppe Floresta, Vincenzo Abbate
    Medicinal Research Reviews.2022; 42(4): 1588.     CrossRef
  • Involvement of Met receptor pathway in aggressive behavior of colorectal cancer cells induced by parathyroid hormone-related peptide
    María Belén Novoa Díaz, Pedro Carriere, Graciela Gigola, Ariel Osvaldo Zwenger, Natalia Calvo, Claudia Gentili
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 28(26): 3177.     CrossRef
  • The potential therapeutic and prognostic impacts of the c‐MET/HGF signaling pathway in colorectal cancer
    Seyed Mostafa Parizadeh, Reza Jafarzadeh‐Esfehani, Danial Fazilat‐Panah, Seyed Mahdi Hassanian, Soodabeh Shahidsales, Majid Khazaei, Seyed Mohammad Reza Parizadeh, Majid Ghayour‐Mobarhan, Gordon A. Ferns, Amir Avan
    IUBMB Life.2019; 71(7): 802.     CrossRef
Small Bowel Obstruction After Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis With a Loop Ileostomy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis
Hitoshi Kameyama, Yoshifumi Hashimoto, Yoshifumi Shimada, Saki Yamada, Ryoma Yagi, Yosuke Tajima, Takuma Okamura, Masato Nakano, Kohei Miura, Masayuki Nagahashi, Jun Sakata, Takashi Kobayashi, Shin-ichi Kosugi, Toshifumi Wakai
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(2):94-100.   Published online April 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.06.14
  • 7,076 View
  • 110 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Small bowel obstruction (SBO) remains a common complication after pelvic or abdominal surgery. However, the risk factors for SBO in ulcerative colitis (UC) surgery are not well known. The aim of the present study was to clarify the risk factors associated with SBO after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) with a loop ileostomy for patients with UC.
Methods
The medical records of 96 patients who underwent IPAA for UC between 1999 and 2011 were reviewed. SBO was confirmed based on the presence of clinical symptoms and radiographic findings. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the SBO group and the non-SBO group. We also analyzed the relationship between SBO and computed tomography (CT) scan image parameters.
Results
The study included 49 male and 47 female patients. The median age was 35.5 years (range, 14–72 years). We performed a 2- or 3-stage procedure as a total proctocolectomy and IPAA for patients with UC. SBO in the pretakedown of the loop ileostomy after IPAA occurred in 22 patients (22.9%). Moreover, surgical intervention for SBO was required for 11 patients. In brief, closure of the loop ileostomy was performed earlier than expected. A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the 2-stage procedure (odds ratio, 2.850; 95% confidence interval, 1.009–8.044; P = 0.048) was a significant independent risk factor associated with SBO. CT scan image parameters were not significant risk factors of SBO.
Conclusion
The present study suggests that a 2-stage procedure is a significant risk factor associated with SBO after IPAA in patients with UC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk Factors for Stoma Outlet Obstruction after Proctocolectomy for Ulcerative Colitis
    Keisuke Ihara, Takatoshi Nakamura, Masashi Takayanagi, Junki Fujita, Yasunori Maeda, Yusuke Nishi, Norisuke Shibuya, Hiroyuki Hachiya, Mitsuru Ishizuka, Keiichi Tominaga, Kazuyuki Kojima, Atsushi Irisawa
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2024; 8(1): 18.     CrossRef
  • Association Between Advanced T Stage and Thick Rectus Abdominis Muscle and Outlet Obstruction and High-Output Stoma After Ileostomy in Patients With Rectal Cancer
    Yasuhiro Komatsu, Kunitoshi Shigeyasu, Sho Takeda, Yoshiko Mori, Kazutaka Takahashi, Nanako Hata, Kokichi Miyamoto, Hibiki Umeda, Yoshihiko Kakiuchi, Satoru Kikuchi, Shuya Yano, Shinji Kuroda, Yoshitaka Kondo, Hiroyuki Kishimoto, Fuminori Teraishi, Masahi
    International Surgery.2022; 106(3): 102.     CrossRef
  • Obstructive and secretory complications of diverting ileostomy
    Shingo Tsujinaka, Hideyuki Suzuki, Tomoya Miura, Yoshihiro Sato, Chikashi Shibata
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 28(47): 6732.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors and management of stoma-related obstruction after laparoscopic colorectal surgery with diverting ileostomy
    Ryo Maemoto, Shingo Tsujinaka, Yasuyuki Miyakura, Rintaro Fukuda, Nao Kakizawa, Tsutomu Takenami, Erika Machida, Nozomi Kikuchi, Rina Kanemitsu, Sawako Tamaki, Hideki Ishikawa, Toshiki Rikiyama
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2021; 44(8): 1037.     CrossRef
  • RISK FACTORS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF COMPLICATIONS OF ILEAL POUCH IN PATIENTS WITH ULCERATIVE COLITIS
    S. I. Achkasov, O. I. Sushkov, A. E. Kulikov, Sh. A. Binnatli, M. A. Nagudov, A. V. Vardanyan
    Koloproktologia.2020; 19(1): 51.     CrossRef
  • A Common Complication After an Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis With a Loop Ileostomy in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: Small Bowel Obstruction
    Chang-Nam Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(2): 57.     CrossRef
  • Elevated risk of stoma outlet obstruction following colorectal surgery in patients undergoing ileal pouch–anal anastomosis: a retrospective cohort study
    Satoshi Okada, Keisuke Hata, Shigenobu Emoto, Koji Murono, Manabu Kaneko, Kazuhito Sasaki, Kensuke Otani, Takeshi Nishikawa, Toshiaki Tanaka, Kazushige Kawai, Hiroaki Nozawa
    Surgery Today.2018; 48(12): 1060.     CrossRef
Case Reports
Abdominal Sarcoidosis Mimicking Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
Won Seok Roh, Seungho Lee, Ji Hyun Park, Jeonghyun Kang
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(2):101-105.   Published online April 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.01.29
  • 6,496 View
  • 126 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
We present a patient diagnosed with skin sarcoidosis, breast cancer, pulmonary tuberculosis, and peritoneal sarcoidosis with a past history of colorectal cancer. During stage work up for breast cancer, suspicious lesions on peritoneum were observed in imaging studies. Considering our patient’s history and imaging findings, we initially suspected peritoneal carcinomatosis. However, the peritoneal lesion was diagnosed as sarcoidosis in laparoscopic biopsy. This case demonstrates that abdominal sarcoidosis might be considered as a differential diagnosis when there is a lesion suspected of being peritoneal carcinomatosis with nontypical clinical presentations.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Spontaneous remission of peritoneal sarcoidosis
    Yosuke Kamiya, Keigo Koda, Mikio Toyoshima, Hitoshi Sumida, Naoko Funai, Takafumi Suda
    The Japanese Journal of Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders.2023; 43(1_2): 112.     CrossRef
  • Rectal cancer combined with abdominal tuberculosis: A case report
    Pei-Gen Liu, Xiang-Fan Chen, Pan-Feng Feng
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(31): 11523.     CrossRef
  • Hypercalcemia and Acute Renal Failure Indicating Peritoneal Sarcoidosis
    Claude Bachmeyer, Nicolas Belaube, Valeria Loi, Dominique Wendum, Mathieu Gauthé, Jean Philippe Haymann
    The American Journal of Medicine.2021; 134(12): e571.     CrossRef
  • Non-neoplastic conditions mimicking peritoneal carcinomatosis at CT imaging
    Mohab M Elmohr, Khaled M Elsayes, Perry J Pickhardt
    The British Journal of Radiology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
Colonoscopic Removal of an Intrauterine Device That Had Perforated the Rectosigmoid Colon
Jin Myeong Huh, Ki Seok Kim, Yong Seok Cho, Dong Kwon Suh, Jae Uk Lee, Seong Deuk Baek, Sin Kil Moon
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(2):106-108.   Published online April 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.10.30
  • 9,332 View
  • 125 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
The intrauterine device (IUD) is a widely used contraceptive method. One of the most serious and rare complications of using an IUD is colon perforation. We report a case of colonoscopic removal of an IUD that had perforated into the rectosigmoid colon in a 42-year-old woman who presented with no symptoms. Colonoscopy showed that the IUD had penetrated into rectosigmoid colon wall and that an arm of the IUD was embedded in the colon wall. We were able to remove the IUD easily by using colonoscopy. The endoscopic approach may be considered the first choice therapy for selected patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Endoscopic Removal of Intrauterine Contraceptive Device From the Descending Colon: A Case Report
    Muhammad Shabbir, Mishal A Aljohani, Abdurahman Alfaiz, Msab Aldakheel, Zeeshan Ali
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Colonoscopic removal of an intrauterine device with rectal perforation: A case report
    Lingrun Ye, Yuanyuan Zhu, Fanglai Zhu
    Medicine.2024; 103(28): e38872.     CrossRef
  • Is It a “Colon Perforation”? A Case Report and Review of the Literature
    Shuangshuang Lu, Xinyu Yao, Jun Shi, Jian Huang, Shaohua Zhuang, Junfang Ma, Yan Liu, Wei Zhang, Lifei Yu, Ping Zhu, Qiuwei Zhu, Ruxia Shi, Hong Zheng, Dong Shao, Yuyan Pan, Shizhen Bao, Li Qin, Lijie Huang, Wenjia Liu, Jin Huang
    Frontiers in Medicine.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic removal of an intrauterine device from the lumen of the sigmoid colon
    V. V. Bereshchenko, D. V. Lazarevich, N. N. Goncharov, P. V. Khodanovich
    Health and Ecology Issues.2022; 19(1): 145.     CrossRef
  • Incomplete Removal of an Intrauterine Device Perforating the Sigmoid Colon
    Junseak Lee, Jung Hwan Oh, Jinsu Kim, Chul-Hyun Lim, Sung Hoon Jung
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 78(1): 48.     CrossRef
  • Chronic nodules of sigmoid perforation caused by incarcerated intrauterine contraception device
    Xiaohui Huang, Rui Zhong, Liqin Zeng, Xuhui He, Qingshan Deng, Xiuhong Peng, Jieming Li, Xiping Luo
    Medicine.2019; 98(4): e14117.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Removal of Migrated Intrauterine Device: Case Report and Review of Literature and Technique
    Yang Lei, Vadim Iablakov, Riaz J. Karmali, Nauzer Forbes
    ACG Case Reports Journal.2019; 6(6): e00090.     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP