Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Previous issues

Page Path
HOME > Browse Articles > Previous issues
14 Previous issues
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Authors
Funded articles
Volume 36(4); August 2020
Prev issue Next issue
Editorials
Benign GI diease, Inflammatory bowel disease
Surgical Treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Crohn Disease: A Long Way to Go to Identify the Optimal Method
Soo Yeun Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):207-208.   Published online August 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.07.03
  • 2,730 View
  • 86 Download
PDF
Malignant disease, Functional outcomes
Effect of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Dae Ro Lim
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):209-210.   Published online August 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.08.16
  • 2,777 View
  • 123 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical study of enhanced recovery after surgery in laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis
    Zhu-Lin Li, Hua-Chong Ma, Yong Yang, Jian-Jun Chen, Zhen-Jun Wang
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(3): 816.     CrossRef
Letters to the Editor
Malignant disease
Hepatic Portal Venous Gas and Anastomotic Leakage
Filippo Carannante, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo, Gianluca Mascianà, Marco Caricato
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):211-211.   Published online August 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.06.13
  • 2,436 View
  • 63 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Hepatic portal venous gas initially manifesting as severe shock: a case series
    Anwei Liu, Jiao Shen, Liansheng Long, Xuezhi Shi, Qiang Wen, Zhiguo Pan
    Journal of International Medical Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Hepatic portal venous gas after ingesting glyphosate: A case report and literature review
    Yingxia Wu, Yijie Zhang, Jiangquan Fu, Feng Shen
    Heliyon.2024; 10(16): e36378.     CrossRef
  • Reply on “Successful Conservative Management of Hepatic Portal Venous Gas due to Anastomosis Leakage After a Sigmoidectomy”
    Seongwoo Hong
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(4): 212.     CrossRef
Malignant disease
Reply on “Successful Conservative Management of Hepatic Portal Venous Gas due to Anastomosis Leakage After a Sigmoidectomy”
Seongwoo Hong
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):212-212.   Published online August 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.08.12
  • 2,234 View
  • 40 Download
PDF
Review
Malignant disease
How to Prevent Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Surgery? A Systematic Review
Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Tarek Kellil, Camillia Jeddi, Ahmed Saidani, Faouzi Chebbi, Khadija Zouari
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):213-222.   Published online August 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.05.14.2
  • 6,593 View
  • 340 Download
  • 20 Web of Science
  • 25 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Anastomosis leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery is an embarrassing problem. It is associated with poor consequence. This review aims to summarize published evidence on prevention of AL after colorectal surgery and provide recommendations according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. We conducted bibliographic research on January 15, 2020, of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. We retained meta-analysis, reviews, and randomized clinical trials. We concluded that mechanical bowel preparation did not reduce AL. It seems that oral antibiotic or oral antibiotic with mechanical bowel preparation could reduce the risk of AL. The surgical approach did not affect the AL rate. The low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery could reduce the AL rate. The mechanical anastomosis is superior to handsewn anastomosis only in case of right colectomies, with similar results in rectal surgery between the 2 anastomosis techniques. In the case of right colectomies, this anastomosis could be performed intracorporeally or extracorporeally with similar outcomes. The air leak test did not reduce AL. There is no interest of external drainage in colonic surgery but drains reduced the rate of AL and rate of reoperation after low anterior resection. The transanal tube reduced the rate of AL.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Collagen patch cover facilitates recovery of bowel function after laparoscopic colectomy
    Pin-Yang Huang, Meng-Che Tsai, Kee-Thai Kiu, Min-Hsuan Yen, Tung-Cheng Chang
    BMC Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of the starch-based anti-adhesive agent 4DryField PH on anastomotic healing after rectal surgery
    Simon Stoerzer, Markus Winny, Oliver Beetz, Severin Jacobi, Juergen Klempnauer, Daniel Poehnert
    International Journal of Surgery Open.2024; 62(1): 6.     CrossRef
  • Bowel preparation for elective colectomy in Crohn's disease: results from a global cohort study using the NSQIP database
    Gustavo Yano Callado, Rodrigo Moisés de Almeida Leite, Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo, Leandro Cardoso Barchi, Waleed Seddiq, Isabela Passarin Correa, Ulysses Ribeiro Junior, Rocco Ricciardi
    Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(4): 709.     CrossRef
  • Does transanal endomicrosurgery affects the results of “salvage mesorectumectomy” for patients with early rectal cancer? Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ph. I. Kirgizov, S. V. Chernyshov, M. A. Nagudov, E. G. Rybakov
    Surgery and Oncology.2024; 14(1): 11.     CrossRef
  • Anastomotic leak rate following the implementation of a powered circular stapler in elective colorectal surgeries: a retrospective cohort study
    Jessica J. Lie, Nadeesha Samarasinghe, Ahmer A. Karimuddin, Carl J. Brown, P. Terry Phang, Manoj J. Raval, Amandeep Ghuman
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Morbidity and Mortality after Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC in a National Reference Center: A Six-Year Experience under Independent Evaluation
    Miguel Enrique Alberto Vilchez, Sebastian Halskov, Axel Winter, Johann Pratschke, Beate Rau, Safak Gül
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(17): 5182.     CrossRef
  • Robotic colectomy with CME versus laparoscopic colon resection with or without CME for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    H Oweira, C Reissfelder, H Elhadedy, N Rahbari, A Mehrabi, W Fattal, JS Khan, MA Chaouch
    The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England.2023; 105(2): 113.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Anastomotic Leak Prevention during Elective Colorectal Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Lidia Castagneto-Gissey, Maria Francesca Russo, James Casella-Mariolo, Angelo Serao, Rosa Marcellinaro, Vito D’Andrea, Massimo Carlini, Giovanni Casella
    Antibiotics.2023; 12(2): 397.     CrossRef
  • Refractory Retroperitoneal Abscess Due to Anastomosis Leakage after Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Combined with Robotic Rectal Resection with Diverting Ileostomy: A Case Report
    Yuichiro Nishida, Yuto Hozaka, Shinichiro Mori, Masumi Wada, Kan Tanabe, Yoshiaki Kita, Takaaki Arigami, Akihiro Nakajo, Michiyo Higashi, Hiroshi Kurahara, Takao Ohtsuka
    The Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery.2023; 56(3): 180.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of transanal drainage tube in preventing anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis
    Shiki Fujino, Masayoshi Yasui, Masayuki Ohue, Norikatsu Miyoshi
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 15(6): 1202.     CrossRef
  • Surgical aspects of stoma formation in oncology. Literature review
    A. S. Gorbunova, D. V. Kuzmichev, Z. Z. Mamedli, A. A. Aniskin, A. V. Polinovsky, D. V. Aleksantsev, A. V. Korshak
    Pelvic Surgery and Oncology.2023; 13(2): 54.     CrossRef
  • How to prevent postoperative ileus in colorectal surgery? a systematic review
    Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Mohamed Aziz Daghmouri, Abdallah Lahdheri, Mohammad Iqbal Hussain, Salsabil Nasri, Amine Gouader, Faouzi Noomen, Hani Oweira
    Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2023; 85(9): 4501.     CrossRef
  • Possible role of features of the intestinal microbiome in patients with colorectal cancer as a cause of anastomotic leak
    P. V. Kosareva, R. A. Konev, A. P. Godovalov, L. V. Sivakova, E. I. Samodelkin
    Bulletin of Siberian Medicine.2023; 22(3): 120.     CrossRef
  • Fluorescence-guided colorectal surgery: applications, clinical results, and protocols
    Jin-Min Jung, In Ja Park, Eun Jung Park, Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 252.     CrossRef
  • Pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies: The experience of a tertiary center from Greece
    Dimitrios Haidopoulos, Vasilios Pergialiotis, Kyveli Aggelou, Nikolaos Thomakos, Nikolaos Alexakis, Emmanouil Stamatakis, Alexandros Rodolakis
    Surgical Oncology.2022; 40: 101702.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin on POD3 for the early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Zheng'ao Xu, Rui Zong, Yu Zhang, Jie Chen, Weidong Liu
    International Journal of Surgery.2022; 100: 106592.     CrossRef
  • Immediate results of rectal resections for cancer in depending on the restoration of the integrity of the pelvic peritoneal floor: retrospective study
    M.  S.  Lebedko, S.  S.  Gordeev, S.   G. Gaydarov, Z.   Z. Mamedli, V.  Yu.  Kosyrev, A.  A.  Aniskin, S.  O.  Kochkina
    Pelvic Surgery and Oncology.2022; 11(3-4): 23.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic PME with colorectal anstomosis with transanal control – A video vignette
    Francesco Crafa, Serafino Vanella, Adele Noviello, Giuseppe Longo, Francesco Longo
    Colorectal Disease.2022; 24(7): 887.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leakage and preventive measures: a retrospective cohort study
    M. S. Lebedko, S. S. Gordeev, E. V. Alieva, M. D. Sivolob, Z. Z. Mamedli, S. G. Gaydarov, V. Yu. Kosyrev
    Pelvic Surgery and Oncology.2022; 12(2): 17.     CrossRef
  • Surgical safety in the COVID-19 era: present and future considerations
    Young Il Kim, In Ja Park
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 102(6): 295.     CrossRef
  • Colonic splenic flexure resection with an end‐to‐end intracorporeal anastomosis using a circular stapler – A video vignette
    Roberto Secchi del Rio, Jose Ignacio Ortiz de Elguea‐Lizarraga, Paulina Muñoz‐Ledo Ceron, Eli Castillo, Victor Gerardo Pena, Diego Marines Copado
    Colorectal Disease.2022; 24(11): 1447.     CrossRef
  • Как предотвратить несостоятельность кишечных анастомозов «высокого риска»
    Эльчин Агаев, Зульфия Исмайылова, Мушвиг Гасанов
    InterConf.2022; (26(129)): 283.     CrossRef
  • Safe Anastomoses without Ostomies in Cytoreductive Surgery with Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Technical Considerations and Modifications
    Pedro Barrios, Isabel Ramos, Oriol Crusellas, Domenico Sabia, Sergio Mompart, Lana Bijelic
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2021; 28(12): 7784.     CrossRef
  • Early salvage total mesorectal excision (sTME) after organ preservation failure in rectal cancer does not worsen postoperative outcomes compared to primary TME: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Jim Khan, Talvinder Singh Gill, Arianeb Mehrabi, Christoph Reissfelder, Nuh Rahberi, Hazem Elhadedy, Hani Oweira
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(11): 2375.     CrossRef
  • Regional techniques for pain management following laparoscopic elective colonic resection: A systematic review
    Mohamed Aziz Daghmouri, Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Maroua Oueslati, Lotfi Rebai, Hani Oweira
    Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2021; 72: 103124.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Benign GI diease
Factors Predicting the Need for Early Surgical Intervention for Small Bowel Obstruction
Young Jae Cho, In Seok Park, Jungbin Kim, Hyun Jin Cho, Geum Hee Gwak, Keun Ho Yang, Byung Noe Bae, Ki Hwan Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):223-228.   Published online January 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.09.30
  • 3,887 View
  • 167 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common disease that requires hospitalization. The most common cause of SBO is postoperative adhesion. Delayed timing of operations in patients who need surgical intervention results in mortality or morbidity. A number of studies on SBO have established criteria for emergency surgery. However, few objective clinical parameters are available for screening patients who need a delayed operation. Therefore, we analyzed factors that affect the clinical course of SBO to select appropriate therapeutic plans for reducing the risk of complications in these patients.
Methods
We investigated the clinical characteristics of patients admitted to the surgery department of our hospital between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016, who were diagnosed with SBO. Patients were divided into an operative treatment group (n = 12) and a conservative treatment group (n = 96). We compared clinical characteristics between the 2 groups.
Results
The operative treatment group underwent more operations before SBO than the conservative treatment group (P = 0.007). Initial leukocyte counts (P = 0.004) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (P = 0.028) were elevated in the operative group. Body mass index (BMI) was lower in the operative group (P = 0.013).
Conclusion
The number of operations before SBO, leukocyte counts, CRP levels, and BMI were useful parameters for selecting patients who needed an urgent operation for SBO.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The predictive role of computed tomography with oral contrast in the successful management of adhesive small bowel obstruction
    Mohamed Khattab, Amr Ayad, Sameh Aziz, Peter Alaa, Marie N. Grace, Mohamed Saber
    The Egyptian Journal of Surgery.2024; 43(1): 16.     CrossRef
  • Predictive factors for operative intervention and ideal length of non-operative trial in adhesive small bowel obstruction
    Tara van Veen, Purushotham Ramanathan, Lolita Ramsey, Jonathan Dort, Dina Tabello
    Surgical Endoscopy.2023; 37(11): 8628.     CrossRef
  • Surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: Is it still mandatory to wait? – An update
    R. Demessence, Y. Lyoubi, F. Feuerstoss, A. Hamy, C. Aubé, A. Paisant, A. Venara
    Journal of Visceral Surgery.2022; 159(4): 309.     CrossRef
  • Prise en charge chirurgicale des syndromes occlusifs de l’intestin grêle sur bride et adhérences postopératoires : faut-il toujours attendre ?
    R. Demessence, Y. Lyoubi, F. Feuerstoss, A. Hamy, C. Aubé, A. Paisant, A. Venara
    Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale.2022; 159(4): 326.     CrossRef
  • Small bowel obstruction
    David J. Detz, Jerica L. Podrat, Jose C. Muniz Castro, Yoon K. Lee, Feibi Zheng, Shawn Purnell, Kevin Y. Pei
    Current Problems in Surgery.2021; 58(7): 100893.     CrossRef
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy
Effect of Age on Laparoscopic Surgery and Postoperative Chemotherapy in Elderly Patients With Colorectal Cancer
Hyun Hee Kim, Myong Hoon Ihn, Yun Hee Lee, Jihyoun Lee, Sangchul Yun, Sung Woo Cho
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):229-242.   Published online January 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.10.03
  • 3,726 View
  • 101 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 9 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
We aimed to evaluate the postoperative complications of laparoscopic colorectal cancer (CRC) surgery and the adverse events of postoperative chemotherapy in elderly patients compared to younger patients and to identify the factors influencing the termination of postoperative chemotherapy.
Methods
Between June 2015 and May 2018, 188 patients with CRC underwent laparoscopic surgery with curative intent. Patients aged ≥ 70 were defined as elderly. Postoperative complications and adverse events of chemotherapy were assessed by using the Clavien-Dindo classification and the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, respectively. The clinicopathological factors were analyzed retrospectively.
Results
Seventy-eight patients were considered elderly with a mean age of 77.5 ± 5.5 years. Overall postoperative complications occurred in 68 patients (36.2%). Age and primary tumor location were independent predictors of overall postoperative complications. Smoking history was the only independent predictor of major postoperative complications. Of 113 patients who were recommended postoperative chemotherapy, 90 patients (79.6%) received postoperative chemotherapy. Overall adverse events occurred in 40 patients (44.4%). The American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification and chemotherapy regimen were significantly associated with overall adverse events. The chemotherapy regimen was the only factor significantly associated with severe adverse events. Of 90 patients, postoperative chemotherapy could not be completed in 11 (12.2%). Age was the only factor significantly associated with stopping postoperative chemotherapy (P = 0.003).
Conclusion
This study shows that laparoscopic CRC surgery and postoperative chemotherapy were feasible in elderly patients. Further efforts are needed to ensure that elderly patients have the opportunity to make informed decisions regarding postoperative chemotherapy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Survival Benefits of Postoperative Chemotherapy in Patients With Colorectal Mucinous Adenocarcinoma: An Analysis Utilizing Propensity Score Matching From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Database
    Jun Rong, Wensheng Deng
    The American Surgeon™.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nutritional Status Indicators Predict Tolerability to Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Stage II/III Rectal Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
    Shinya Abe, Hiroaki Nozawa, Kazuhito Sasaki, Koji Murono, Shigenobu Emoto, Yuichiro Yokoyama, Hiroyuki Matsuzaki, Yuzo Nagai, Takahide Shinagawa, Hirofumi Sonoda, Soichiro Ishihara
    Digestion.2024; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Differences in prognosis and underuse of adjuvant chemotherapy between elderly and non‐elderly patients in stage III colorectal cancer
    Takuya Shiraishi, Hiroomi Ogawa, Ikuma Shioi, Naoya Ozawa, Katsuya Osone, Takuhisa Okada, Makoto Sohda, Ken Shirabe, Hiroshi Saeki
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2023; 7(1): 91.     CrossRef
  • Clinical outcomes and cost comparison of laparoscopic versus open surgery in elderly colorectal cancer patients over 80 years
    Aik Yong Chok, Ivan En-Howe Tan, Yun Zhao, Madeline Yen Min Chee, Hui Lionel Raphael Chen, Kwok Ann Ang, Marianne Kit Har Au, Emile John Kwong Wei Tan
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association between social background and implementation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for older patients undergoing curative resection of colorectal cancers, sub-analysis of the HiSCO-04 study
    Tomoaki Bekki, Manabu Shimomura, Yasufumi Saito, Masahiro Nakahara, Tomohiro Adachi, Satoshi Ikeda, Yosuke Shimizu, Masatoshi Kochi, Yasuyo Ishizaki, Masanori Yoshimitsu, Yuji Takakura, Wataru Shimizu, Daisuke Sumitani, Shinya Kodama, Masahiko Fujimori, M
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Operative and Survival Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Elderly and Very Elderly Patients: A Study in a Tertiary Hospital in South Korea
    Hugo Cuellar-Gomez, Siti Mayuha Rusli, María Esther Ocharan-Hernández, Tae-Hoon Lee, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Seon-Hahn Kim, Cruz Vargas-De-León, Yazhou He
    Journal of Oncology.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early colon cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 558.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategy for Early Colon Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 203.     CrossRef
  • Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Elderly Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Bengt Glimelius, Erik Osterman
    Cancers.2020; 12(8): 2289.     CrossRef
Benign GI diease, Inflammatory bowel disease
Clinical Characteristics and Postoperative Outcomes of Patients Presenting With Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Crohn Disease
Joon Suk Moon, Jong Lyul Lee, Chang Sik Yu, Seok-Byung Lim, In Ja Park, Yong Sik Yoon, Chan Wook Kim, Suk-Kyun Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Sang Hyoung Park, Hassan Abdullah Alsaleem, Jin Cheon Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):243-248.   Published online March 16, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.10.16.1
  • 3,329 View
  • 116 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Upper gastrointestinal (GI) tract involvement in Crohn disease (CD) is rare and effectiveness of surgical treatment is limited. The aim of this study was to evaluate characteristics and surgical outcomes of upper GI CD.
Methods
Medical records of 811 patients who underwent intestinal surgery for CD between January 2006 and December 2015 at a single institution were reviewed. Upper GI CD was defined by involvement of the stomach to the fourth portion of duodenum, with or without concomitant small/large bowel CD involvement according to a modification of the Montreal classification.
Results
We identified 24 patients (21 males, 3 females) who underwent surgery for upper GI CD. The mean age at diagnosis was 27 ± 12 years, the mean age at surgery was 33 ± 11 years, and the mean duration of CD was 73.6 ± 56.6 months. Fifteen patients (62.5%) had history of previous perianal surgery. Ten patients (41.7%) had duodenal or gastric stricture and 14 patients (58.3%) had penetrating fistula; patients with fistula were significantly more likely to develop complications (57.1% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.035). One patient with stricture had surgical recurrence. In seven patients with fistula, fistula was related to previous anastomosis. Patients with fistula had significantly longer hospital stays than those with stricture (16 days vs. 11 days, P = 0.01).
Conclusion
Upper GI CD is rare among CD types (2.96%). In patients with upper GI CD, penetrating fistula was associated with longer hospital stay and more complications.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Update S2k-Guideline Helicobacter pylori and gastroduodenal ulcer disease of the German Society of Gastroenterology, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases (DGVS)
    Wolfgang Fischbach, Jan Bornschein, Jörg C. Hoffmann, Sibylle Koletzko, Alexander Link, Lukas Macke, Peter Malfertheiner, Kerstin Schütte, Dieter-Michael Selgrad, Sebastian Suerbaum, Christian Schulz
    Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2024; 62(02): 261.     CrossRef
  • Aktualisierte S2k-Leitlinie Helicobacter pylori und gastroduodenale Ulkuskrankheit der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) – Juli 2022 – AWMF-Registernummer: 021–001

    Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2023; 61(05): 544.     CrossRef
  • A systematic review and meta‐analysis of prevalence and clinical features of upper gastrointestinal (UGI) tract Crohn's disease in adults compared to non‐UGI types
    Babak Tamizifar, Peyman Adibi, Maryam Hadipour, Vahid Mohamadi
    JGH Open.2023; 7(5): 325.     CrossRef
  • Upper gastrointestinal tract involvement of Crohn disease: clinical implications in children and adolescents
    Eun Sil Kim, Mi Jin Kim
    Clinical and Experimental Pediatrics.2022; 65(1): 21.     CrossRef
  • Profiling non-coding RNA levels with clinical classifiers in pediatric Crohn’s disease
    Ranjit Pelia, Suresh Venkateswaran, Jason D. Matthews, Yael Haberman, David J. Cutler, Jeffrey S. Hyams, Lee A. Denson, Subra Kugathasan
    BMC Medical Genomics.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Surgical Treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Crohn Disease: A Long Way to Go to Identify the Optimal Method
    Soo Yeun Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(4): 207.     CrossRef
Benign proctology
A New Classification for Hemorrhoidal Disease: The Creation of the “BPRST” Staging and Its Application in Clinical Practice
Carlos Walter Sobrado Júnior, Carlos de Almeida Obregon, Afonso Henrique da Silva e Sousa Júnior, Lucas Faraco Sobrado, Sérgio Carlos Nahas, Ivan Cecconello
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):249-255.   Published online June 1, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.02.06
  • 7,306 View
  • 383 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 12 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Present an updated classification for symptomatic hemorrhoids, which not only guides the treatment of internal hemorrhoids but also the treatment of external components. In addition, this new classification includes new treatment alternatives created over the last few years.
Methods
Throughout the past 7 years, the authors developed a method to classify patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids. This study, besides presenting this classification proposal, also retrospectively analyzed 149 consecutive patients treated between March 2011 and November 2013 and aimed to evaluate the association between the management adopted with Goligher classification and our proposed BPRST classification.
Results
Both classifications had a statistically significant association with the adopted management strategies. However, the BPRST classification tended to have fewer management discrepancies when each stage of disease was individually analyzed.
Conclusion
Although there is much disagreement about how the classification of hemorrhoidal disease should be updated, it is accepted that some kind of revision is needed. The BPRST method showed a strong association with the management that should be adopted for each stage of the disease. Further studies are needed for its validation, but the current results are encouraging.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical evidence and rationale of mesoglycan to treat chronic venous disease and hemorrhoidal disease: a narrative review
    Gaetano Gallo, Arcangelo Picciariello, Antonella Tufano, Giuseppe Camporese
    Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(2): 423.     CrossRef
  • The role of flavonoids in the pharmacological treatment of haemorrhoids
    SS Singh, MA Strydom, M Balmith, C Megaw, MJ Nell
    South African General Practitioner.2024; 5(1): 36.     CrossRef
  • Timing and Modality of Hemorrhoidal Prolapse Impact on Patients’ Quality of Life
    Carlo Ratto, Angelo Parello, Angelo Alessandro Marra, Paola Campennì, Veronica De Simone, Francesco Litta
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(13): 3946.     CrossRef
  • Topical Lidocaine or Lidocaine/Diltiazem Ointment Following Rubber Band Ligation of Hemorrhoids: A Prospective 3-Armed Randomized Controlled Trial
    Allan M.F. Kwok, Stephen R. Smith, Jie Zhao, Rosemary Carroll, Lucy Leigh, Brian Draganic
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2023; 66(8): 1110.     CrossRef
  • Time to change? Present and prospects of hemorrhoidal classification
    Ling Wang, Jiachun Ni, Changcheng Hou, Di Wu, Li Sun, Qiong Jiang, Zengjin Cai, Wenbin Fan
    Frontiers in Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for hemorrhoidal disease among healthy young and middle-aged Korean adults
    Yun Soo Hong, Kyung Uk Jung, Sanjay Rampal, Di Zhao, Eliseo Guallar, Seungho Ryu, Yoosoo Chang, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun, Chong Il Sohn, Hocheol Shin, Juhee Cho
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of postoperative pain and symptoms control following laser haemorrhoidoplasty versus Milligan-Morgan haemorrhoidectomy for symptomatic haemorrhoids: a new standard
    Varen Zhi Zheng Tan, Ern-wei Peck, Sharmini S. Sivarajah, Winson J. Tan, Leonard M. L. Ho, Jia-Lin Ng, Cheryl Chong, Darius Aw, Franky Mainza, Fung-Joon Foo, Frederick H. Koh
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(8): 1759.     CrossRef
  • Treatment of Hemorrhoid in Unusual Condition-Pregnancy
    Hyo Seon Ryu
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy vs. hemorrhoid artery ligation and recto-anal repair: a comparative study
    Dimitrios Symeonidis, Michail Spyridakis, Dimitrios Zacharoulis, George Tzovaras, Athina A. Samara, Alexandros Valaroutsos, Alexandros Diamantis, Konstantinos Tepetes
    BMC Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Management of Stage 3 Haemorrhoids with Homoeopathy – A case report
    Jyothi Vijaykumar, Dhanya Deepak Bhat
    Journal of Integrated Standardized Homoeopathy.2022; 5: 107.     CrossRef
  • The novel BPRST classification for hemorrhoidal disease: A cohort study and an algorithm for treatment
    Carlos Walter Sobrado, Carlos de Almeida Obregon, Lucas Faraco Sobrado, Lucas Morales Bassi, José Américo Bacchi Hora, Afonso Henrique Silva e Sousa Júnior, Sergio Carlos Nahas, Ivan Cecconello
    Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2021; 61: 97.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation Of Anti-inflammatory Mediated Anti-hemorrhoidal Activity of Lawsonia inermis on Croton Oil Induced Hemorrhoidal Rats
    Sai Krishna Nallajerla, Suhasin Ganta
    Anti-Inflammatory & Anti-Allergy Agents in Medicinal Chemistry.2021; 21(1): 62.     CrossRef
Benign proctology
Comparison of 3-Dimensional Pelvic Floor Ultrasonography and Defecography for Assessment of Posterior Pelvic Floor Disorders
Hong Yoon Jeong, Shi-Jun Yang, Dong Ho Cho, Duk Hoon Park, Jong Kyun Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):256-263.   Published online March 16, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.02.09
  • 3,353 View
  • 119 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D) pelvic floor ultrasonography and compare it with defecography in assessment of posterior pelvic disorders.
Methods
Eligible patients were consecutive women undergoing 3D pelvic floor ultrasonography at one hospital between August 2017 and February 2019. All 3D pelvic floor ultrasonography was performed by one examiner. A total of 167 patients with suspected posterior pelvic disorder was retrospectively enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the main symptoms.
Results
There were 82 rectoceles on defecography (55 barium trapping) and 84 on 3D pelvic floor ultrasonography. Each modality identified 6 enteroceles. There were 43 patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia on defecography and 41 on ultrasonography. There were 84 patients with intussusception on defecography and 41 on 3D pelvic floor ultrasonography. Agreement of the 2 diagnostic tests was confirmed using Cohen’s kappa value. Rectocele (kappa, 0.784) and enterocele (kappa, 0.654) both indicated good agreement between defecography and 3D pelvic floor ultrasonography. In addition, pelvic floor dyssynergia (kappa, 0.406) showed moderate agreement, while internal intussusception (kappa, 0.296) had fair agreement.
Conclusion
This study showed good agreement for detection of posterior pelvic disorders between defecography and 3D pelvic floor ultrasonography.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Rectal prolapse and surgery for faecal incontinence
    Judith Johnston, Athur Harikrishnan
    Surgery (Oxford).2023; 41(7): 449.     CrossRef
  • Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in MR-guided focused ultrasound ablation on uterus fibroids: lesion selection and assessment of ablative effects
    Wen Luo, Pei-di Zhang, Xiao Yang, Jian-min Zheng, Ying Liu, Xing Tang, Hai-jing Liu, Lei Ding, Li-na Pang, Xiao-dong Zhou, Li-wen Liu, Min-wen Zheng
    European Radiology.2022; 32(3): 2110.     CrossRef
  • Colonic pseudo-obstruction in a patient with dyssynergic defecation: A case report
    Yejun Jeong, Yongjae Kim, Wonhyun Kim, Seoyeon Park, Su-Jin Shin, Eun Jung Park
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2022; 98: 107524.     CrossRef
  • Is It a Refractory Disease?- Fecal Incontinence; beyond Medication
    Chungyeop Lee, Jong Lyul Lee
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Three-Dimensional Pelvic Floor Ultrasound Assessment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Minimal Levator Hiatus and Levator Ani Deficiency Score
    Yongwoo Yune, Hong Yoon Jeong, Duk Hoon Park, Jong Kyun Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(5): 291.     CrossRef
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer
Influence of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol on Postoperative Inflammation and Short-term Postoperative Surgical Outcomes After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Heba Essam Jaloun, In Kyu Lee, Min Ki Kim, Na Young Sung, Suhail Abdullah Al Turkistani, Sun Min Park, Dae Youn Won, Sang Hyun Hong, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Yoon Suk Lee, Hae Myung Jeon
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):264-272.   Published online May 15, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.03.25
  • 7,737 View
  • 167 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 15 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Many studies have shown that the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols improve postoperative surgical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to observe the effects on postoperative inflammatory markers and to explore the effects of a high degree of compliance and the use of epidural anesthesia on inflammation and surgical outcomes.
Methods
Four hundred patients underwent colorectal cancer surgery at 2 hospitals during 2 different periods, namely, from January 2006 to December 2009 and from January 2017 to July 2017. Data related to the patient’s clinicopathological features, inflammatory markers, percentage of compliance with elements of the ERAS protocol, and use of epidural anesthesia were collected from a prospectively maintained database.
Results
The complication rate and the length of hospital stay (LOS) were less in the ERAS group than in the conventional group (P = 0.005 and P ≤ 0.001, respectively). The postoperative white blood cell count and the duration required for leukocytes to normalize were reduced in patients following the ERAS protocol (P ≤ 0.001). Other inflammatory markers, such as lymphocyte count (P = 0.008), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.032), and C-reactive protein level (P ≤ 0.001), were lower in the ERAS protocol group. High compliance ( ≥ 70%) was strongly associated with the complication rate and the LOS (P = 0.008 and P ≤ 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion
ERAS protocols decrease early postoperative inflammation and improves short-term postoperative recovery outcomes such as complication rate and the LOS. High compliance ( ≥ 70%) with the ERAS protocol elements accelerates the positive effects of ERAS on surgical outcomes; however, the effect on inflammation was very small.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Challenging issues of implementing enhanced recovery after surgery programs in South Korea
    Soo-Hyuk Yoon, Ho-Jin Lee
    Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.2024; 19(1): 24.     CrossRef
  • Effect of different anesthetic modalities with multimodal analgesia on postoperative pain level in colorectal tumor patients
    Ji-Chun Tang, Jia-Wei Ma, Jin-Jin Jian, Jie Shen, Liang-Liang Cao
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2024; 16(2): 364.     CrossRef
  • Enhanced recovery pathway in open and minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective study on feasibility, compliance, and outcomes in a high-volume resource limited tertiary cancer center
    Martin Thomas, Vandana Agarwal, Ashwin DeSouza, Riddhi Joshi, Minal Mali, Karuna Panhale, Omkar K. Salvi, Reshma Ambulkar, Shailesh Shrikhande, Avanish Saklani
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Initial experience of abdominal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using the da Vinci single port system
    Wed Alshalawi, Chul Seung Lee, In Kyeong Kim, Yoon Suk Lee
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2023; 26(4): 208.     CrossRef
  • Association between enrollment in an enhanced recovery program for colorectal cancer surgery and long‐term recurrence and survival
    Andres Zorrilla‐Vaca, Javier Ripolles‐Melchor, Ane Abad‐Motos, Inés Rubiera Mingu, Nekane Moreno‐Jurado, Fátima Martínez‐Durán, Isabel Pérez‐Martínez, Alfredo Abad‐Gurumeta, María L. FuenMayor‐Varela, Gabriel E. Mena, Michael C. Grant
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022; 125(8): 1269.     CrossRef
  • Implementation and improvement of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for colorectal cancer surgery
    Bo Yoon Choi, Jung Hoon Bae, Chul Seung Lee, Seung Rim Han, Yoon Suk Lee, In Kyu Lee
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 102(4): 223.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery with Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine on Postoperative Stress Response of Patients with Gastrointestinal Tumors
    Haiping Zhao, Wenhui Sun, Tao Huang
    Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early colon cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 558.     CrossRef
  • Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer
    Sung Uk Bae
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 577.     CrossRef
  • Commentary: Preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts complications after esophageal resection that can be used as inclusion criteria for enhanced recovery after surgery
    Cheng Shen, Qiang Pu, Guowei Che
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategy for Early Colon Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 203.     CrossRef
  • Current Status and Future of Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Sung Uk Bae
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 221.     CrossRef
  • A propensity score-matched analysis of advanced energy devices and conventional monopolar device for colorectal cancer surgery: comparison of clinical and oncologic outcomes
    Woo Jin Song, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(5): 290.     CrossRef
  • Enhanced recovery after surgery: importance of compliance audits
    Jung Hoon Bae
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2021; 64(12): 820.     CrossRef
  • Effect of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
    Dae Ro Lim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(4): 209.     CrossRef
Malignant disease, Prognosis and adjuvant therapy
Long-term Oncologic Outcome of Postoperative Complications After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Chang Kyu Oh, Jung Wook Huh, You Jin Lee, Moon Suk Choi, Dae Hee Pyo, Sung Chul Lee, Seong Mun Park, Jung Kyong Shin, Yoon Ah Park, Yong Beom Cho, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):273-280.   Published online November 13, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.10.15
  • 4,040 View
  • 162 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 17 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The impact of postoperative complications on long-term oncologic outcome after radical colorectal cancer surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the risk factors and oncologic outcomes of surgery-related postoperative complication groups.
Methods
From January 2010 to December 2010, 310 patients experienced surgery-related postoperative complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery. These stage I–III patients were classified into 2 subgroups, minor (grades I, II) and major (grades III, IV) complication groups, according to extended Clavien-Dindo classification system criteria. Clinicopathologic differences between the 2 groups were analyzed to identify risk factors for major complications. The diseasefree survival rates of surgery-related postoperative complication groups were also compared.
Results
Minor and major complication groups were stratified with 194 patients (62.6%) and 116 patients (37.4%), respectively. The risk factors influencing the major complication group were pathologic N category and operative method. The prognostic factors associated with disease-free survival were preoperative perforation, perineural invasion, tumor budding, and receiving neoadjuvant therapy. With a median follow-up period of 72.2 months, the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 84.4% in the minor group and 78.5% in the major group, but there was no statistical significance between the minor and major groups (P = 0.392).
Conclusion
Advanced cancer and open surgery were identified as risk factors for increased surgery-related major complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery. However, severity of postoperative complications did not affect disease-free survival from colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Accelerated enhanced recovery after colon cancer surgery with discharge within one day after surgery: a systematic review
    Misha A. T. Sier, Anke H. C. Gielen, Thaís T. T. Tweed, Noémi C. van Nie, Tim Lubbers, Jan H. M. B. Stoot
    BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors of Postoperative Complication and Hospital Mortality after Colorectal Perforation Surgery
    Kensuke Kudou, Shuhei Kajiwara, Takashi Motomura, Takafumi Yukaya, Tomonori Nakanoko, Yosuke Kuroda, Masahiro Okamoto, Tadashi Koga, Yo-Ichi Yamashita
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2024; 8(2): 118.     CrossRef
  • Predictive value of POSSUM scoring system for postoperative complications and mortality in elderly patients with colorectal cancer
    Qiang Li, Yingjun Lu
    Technology and Health Care.2024; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative Complications Result in Poor Oncological Outcomes: What Is the Evidence?
    Anjana Wajekar, Sohan Lal Solanki, Juan Cata, Vijaya Gottumukkala
    Current Oncology.2024; 31(8): 4632.     CrossRef
  • Robotic versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery in Rectal Cancer: Analysis of Medium-Term Oncological Outcomes
    Jing-jing Li, Zhi-bo Zhang, Shi-yun Xu, Cheng-ren Zhang, Xiong-fei Yang, Yao-xing Duan
    Surgical Innovation.2023; 30(1): 36.     CrossRef
  • Do postoperative infectious complications really affect long‐term survival in colorectal cancer surgery? A multicenter retrospective cohort study
    Akihisa Matsuda, Hiroshi Maruyama, Shinji Akagi, Toru Inoue, Kenichiro Uemura, Minako Kobayashi, Hisanori Shiomi, Manabu Watanabe, Hiroki Arai, Yutaka Kojima, Yusuke Mizuuchi, Hajime Yokomizo, Yuji Toiyama, Toru Miyake, Yasuyuki Yokoyama, Kei Ishimaru, Sh
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2023; 7(1): 110.     CrossRef
  • International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment
    Audrius Dulskas, Philip F. Caushaj, Domas Grigoravicius, Liu Zheng, Richard Fortunato, Joseph W. Nunoo-Mensah, Narimantas E. Samalavicius
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(4): 307.     CrossRef
  • Effect of serum lactate dehydrogenase-to-albumin ratio (LAR) on the short-term outcomes and long-term prognosis of colorectal cancer after radical surgery
    Xin-Peng Shu, Ying-Chun Xiang, Fei Liu, Yong Cheng, Wei Zhang, Dong Peng
    BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Modified Clavien–Dindo–sink classification system for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Ndéye F. Guissé, Joseph D. Stone, Lukas G. Keil, Tracey P. Bastrom, Mark A. Erickson, Burt Yaszay, Patrick J. Cahill, Stefan Parent, Peter G. Gabos, Peter O. Newton, Michael P. Glotzbecker, Michael P. Kelly, Joshua M. Pahys, Nicholas D. Fletcher
    Spine Deformity.2022; 10(1): 87.     CrossRef
  • Surgical site infection after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer is associated with compromised long-term oncological outcome
    Nana Sugamata, Takashi Okuyama, Emiko Takeshita, Haruka Oi, Yuhei Hakozaki, Shunya Miyazaki, Musashi Takada, Takashi Mitsui, Takuji Noro, Hideyuki Yoshitomi, Masatoshi Oya
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Does Preoperative Waiting Time Affect the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer Patients? A Retrospective Study from the West of China
    Xiao-Yu Liu, Zi-Wei Li, Bing Kang, Yu-Xi Cheng, Wei Tao, Bin Zhang, Hua Zhang, Zheng-Qiang Wei, Dong Peng, Antonio Giovanni Solimando
    Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Surgical safety in the COVID-19 era: present and future considerations
    Young Il Kim, In Ja Park
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 102(6): 295.     CrossRef
  • Current status and role of robotic approach in patients with low-lying rectal cancer
    Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer
    Sung Uk Bae
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 577.     CrossRef
  • Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, and Current Management
    Seung Mi Yeo, Gyung Mo Son
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current Status and Future of Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Sung Uk Bae
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 221.     CrossRef
  • A propensity score-matched analysis of advanced energy devices and conventional monopolar device for colorectal cancer surgery: comparison of clinical and oncologic outcomes
    Woo Jin Song, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(5): 290.     CrossRef
Case Reports
Benign GI diease
Small Bowel Perforation Associated With Gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease and Cytomegalovirus Enteritis in a Patient With Leukemia: A Case Report With Literature Review
Kwang-Seop Song, Min Jung Kim, Han-Ki Lim, Yoon Hwa Hong, Sung Sil Park, Chang Won Hong, Sung Chan Park, Dae Kyung Sohn, Kyung Su Han, Jae Hwan Oh
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):281-284.   Published online August 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.10.01.1
  • 3,120 View
  • 86 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Concomitant cytomegalovirus (CMV) enteritis worsens the prognosis of this condition. We report a case of small bowel perforation associated with gastrointestinal GVHD and CMV enteritis in a patient with leukemia who was successfully treated surgically. A 39-year-old man presented with intestinal perforation necessitating emergency surgical intervention. He was diagnosed with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and developed severe gastrointestinal GVHD and CMV enteritis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. His terminal ileum showed a perforation with diffuse wall thinning, and petechiae were observed over long segments of the distal ileum and the proximal colon. Small bowel segmental resection and a subtotal colectomy with a double-barreled ileocolostomy were performed. The patient recovered uneventfully after the operation. Based on reports described in the literature, surgery plays a minor role in the management of gastrointestinal GVHD; however, timely surgical intervention could be effective in selected patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Cytomegalovirus enteritis resistant to antiviral drugs improved following total colectomy
    Sae Kawata, Jumpei Takamatsu, Yuichi Yasue, Aya Fukuhara, Jinkoo Kang
    Surgical Case Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
Malignant disease
Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery: Endoscopy Assisted Treatment of Colorectal Anastomotic Stenosis
Giancarlo D'Ambrosio, Antonietta Lamazza, Rossella Palma, Andrea Picchetto, Cristina Panetta, Antonello Trecca, Stefano Pontone, Emanuele Lezoche
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):285-288.   Published online March 16, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.09.30.3
  • 4,380 View
  • 126 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) is a type of natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, developed for rectal tumors and used also to treat other rectal diseases. Anastomotic complications after colorectal surgery, including stenosis, represent a challenging problem. We present the case of a 36-year-old woman with a diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease that was submitted to a modified Duhamel operation. A postoperative barium enema showed a complete stricture of the anastomosis that was impossible to resolve by flexible endoscopic approach. Then an intraoperative endoscopic approach to facilitate the localization of preanastomotic colon (proximal colon from the anastomosis) was performed by a small colotomy and the colonic recanalization was obtained by the creation of a neo-anastomosis by TEM, under fluoroscopic-endoscopic control. The patient underwent a control barium enema showing regular retrograde transit of contrast medium without evidence of stenosis. In our experience, transanal approach by TEM-colonoscopy assisted is safe and feasible and represents a model of combined minimally invasive technique.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Application of transurethral prostate resection instrumentation for treating rectal anastomotic stenosis: Case series
    Wenshan Xu, Yujie Qin, Faying Yang, Jun Qian, Yanbo Dong, Song Tu, Jiaxi Yao
    Medicine.2023; 102(19): e33799.     CrossRef
  • Eight Years Experience of Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery
    Seyed Vahid Hosseini, Mohammad Rezazadehkermani, Ali Abdulridha Abbas Algharah, Alimohammad Bananzadeh, Seyedeh Saeideh Shahidinia, Mehrdad Haghazali
    Journal of Coloproctology.2023; 43(04): e251.     CrossRef
  • Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Anastomotic Stenosis After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
    Wei Zhou, Lian Xia, Zian Wang, Gaoyang Cao, Li Chen, Engeng Chen, Wei Zhang, Zhangfa Song
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2022; 65(8): 1062.     CrossRef
  • Application of endoscopic technique in completely occluded anastomosis with anastomotic separation after radical resection of colon cancer: a case report and literature review
    Junnan Gu, Shenghe Deng, Yinghao Cao, Fuwei Mao, Hang Li, Huili Li, Jiliang Wang, Ke Wu, Kailin Cai
    BMC Surgery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP