Purpose Current acceptance of the watch-and-wait (W&W) approach by surgeons in Asia-Pacific countries is unknown. An international survey was performed to determine status of the W&W approach on behalf of the Asia-Pacific Federation of Coloproctology (APFCP).
Methods Surgeons in the APFCP completed an Institutional Review Board-approved anonymous e-survey and/or printed letters (for China) containing 19 questions regarding nonsurgical close observation in patients who achieved clinical complete response (cCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT).
Results Of the 417 responses, 80.8% (n = 337) supported the W&W approach and 65.5% (n = 273) treated patients who achieved cCR after nCRT. Importantly, 78% of participants (n = 326) preferred a selective W&W approach in patients with old age and medical comorbidities who achieved cCR. In regard to restaging methods after nCRT, the majority of respondents based their decision to use W&W on a combination of magnetic resonance imaging results (94.5%, n = 394) with other test results. For interval between nCRT completion and tumor response assessment, most participants used 8 weeks (n = 154, 36.9%), followed by 6 weeks (n = 127, 30.5%) and 4 weeks (n = 102, 24.5%). In response to the question of how often responders followed-up after W&W, the predominant period was every 3 months (209 participants, 50.1%) followed by every 2 months (75 participants, 18.0%). If local regrowth was found during follow-up, most participants (79.9%, n = 333) recommended radical surgery as an initial management.
Conclusion The W&W approach is supported by 80% of Asia-Pacific surgeons and is practiced at 65%, although heterogeneous hospital or society protocols are also observed. These results inform oncologists of future clinical study participation.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Effects of clinical information on the treatment decisions for good responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy among rectal cancer patients Eon Bin Kim, In Ja Park, Hwa Jung Kim, Jong Keon Jang, Seong Ho Park, Young Il Kim, Min Hyun Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(5): 473. CrossRef
Patient and multidisciplinary team perspectives on watch and wait in rectal cancer Helen Mohan, Mohammed Rabie, Ciaran Walsh, Deena Harji, Paul Sutton, Ian Geh, Ian Jackson, Emma Helbren, Martyn Evans, John T. Jenkins Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(7): 1489. CrossRef
Organ preservation for early rectal cancer using preoperative chemoradiotherapy Gyung Mo Son Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(3): 191. CrossRef
International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment Audrius Dulskas, Philip F. Caushaj, Domas Grigoravicius, Liu Zheng, Richard Fortunato, Joseph W. Nunoo-Mensah, Narimantas E. Samalavicius Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(4): 307. CrossRef
Clinical Implication of Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy In Ja Park The Ewha Medical Journal.2022; 45(1): 3. CrossRef
Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early rectal cancer Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Sung Hwan Cho, Byung-Soo Park, Hyun Sung Kim, Su Bum Park, Hyung Wook Kim, Sang Bo Oh, Tae Un Kim, Dong Hoon Shin Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(1): 32. CrossRef
Watch and wait strategies for rectal cancer: A systematic review In Ja Park Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(2): 91. CrossRef
Surgical treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 568. CrossRef
Correlation between T stage and lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy Seijong Kim, Jung Wook Huh, Woo Yong Lee, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Yong Beom Cho, Yoonah Park, Jung Kyong Shin Therapeutic Advances in Medical Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Recent Advance in the Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-An English Version Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 213. CrossRef
Update on Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal
Cancer Chan Wook Kim The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
The watch-and-wait strategy versus radical resection for rectal cancer patients with a good response (≤ycT2) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(6): 350. CrossRef
Contemporary snapshot of tumor regression grade (TRG) distribution in locally advanced rectal cancer: a cross sectional multicentric experience Paola Germani, Francesca Di Candido, Daniel Léonard, Dajana Cuicchi, Ugo Elmore, Marco Ettore Allaix, Vittoria Pia Barbieri, Laura D’Allens, Seraina Faes, Marika Milani, Damiano Caputo, Carmen Martinez, Jan Grosek, Valerio Caracino, Niki Christou, Sapho X Updates in Surgery.2021; 73(5): 1795. CrossRef
Non-operative Management (NOM) of Rectal Cancer: Literature Review and Translation of Evidence into Practice Christopher J. Anker, Dmitriy Akselrod, Steven Ades, Nancy A. Bianchi, Nataniel H. Lester-Coll, Peter A. Cataldo Current Colorectal Cancer Reports.2021; 17(2): 23. CrossRef
Comparison between Local Excision and Radical Resection for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer in ypT0-1 Patients: An Analysis of the Clinicopathological Factors and Survival Rates Soo Young Oh, In Ja Park, Young IL Kim, Jong-Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim Cancers.2021; 13(19): 4823. CrossRef
Widening role of multidisciplinary treatment for rectal cancer: toward diversity of cancer care Yong Beom Cho Precision and Future Medicine.2021; 5(4): 149. CrossRef