Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
11 "Bong-Hyeon Kye"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Minimally invasive surgery
Preoperative localization of potentially invisible colonic lesions on the laparoscopic operation field: using autologous blood tattooing
Ji Yeon Mun, Hyunjoon An, Ri Na Yoo, Hyeon-Min Cho, Bong-Hyeon Kye
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(3):225-233.   Published online June 19, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00059.0008
  • 2,464 View
  • 167 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Preoperative colonoscopic (POC) localization is recommended for patients scheduled for elective laparoscopic colectomy for early colon cancer. Among the various localization method, POC tattooing localization has been widely used. Several dyes have been used for tattooing, but dye has disadvantages, including foreign body reactions. For this reason, we have used autologous blood tattooing for POC localization. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the autologous blood tattooing method.
Methods
This study included patients who required POC localization of the colonic neoplasm among the patients who were scheduled for elective colon resection. The indication for localization was early colon cancer (clinically T1 or T2) or colonic neoplasms that could not be resected endoscopically. POC autologous blood tattooing was performed after saline injection, and 2 hemoclips were applied.
Results
A total of 45 patients who underwent autologous blood tattooing and laparoscopic colectomy were included in this study. All POC localization sites were visible in the laparoscopic view. POC localization sites showed almost perfect agreement with intraoperative surgical findings. There were no complications like bowel perforation, peritonitis, hemoperitoneum, and mesenteric hematoma.
Conclusion
Autologous blood is a safe and effective agent for localizing materials that can replace previous dyes. However, a large prospective case-control study is required for the routine application of this procedure in early colon cancer or colonic neoplasms.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Meeting report on the 8th Asian Science Editors’ Conference and Workshop 2024
    Eun Jung Park
    Science Editing.2025; 12(1): 66.     CrossRef
The pattern of bowel dysfunction in patients with rectal cancer following the multimodal treatment: anorectal manometric measurements at before and after chemoradiation therapy, and postoperative 1 year
Ri Na Yoo, Bong-Hyeon Kye, HyungJin Kim, Gun Kim, Hyeon-Min Cho
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(1):32-40.   Published online March 11, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00696.0099
  • 3,562 View
  • 155 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Bowel dysfunction commonly occurs in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with a multimodal approach of chemoradiation therapy (CRT) combined with sphincter-preserving rectal resection. This study investigated the decline in anorectal function using sequential anorectal manometric measurements obtained before and after the multimodal treatment as well as at a 1-year follow-up.
Methods
This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a single center. The study population consisted of patients with locally advanced mid- to low rectal cancer who received the preoperative CRT followed by sphincter-preserving surgery from 2012 to 2016. The anorectal manometric value measured after each treatment modality was compared to demonstrate the degree of decline in anorectal function. A generalized linear model of repeated measures was performed using the manometric values measured pre- and post-CRT, and at 12 months postoperatively.
Results
Overall, 100 patients with 3 consecutive manometric data were included in the final analysis. In the overall cohort study, the mean resting and maximal squeezing pressures showed insignificant decrement post-neoadjuvant CRT. At a 1-year postoperative follow-up, the maximal squeezing pressure significantly decreased. The maximal rectal sensory threshold demonstrated significant reduction consecutively after each following treatment (P<0.001).
Conclusion
The short-term effect of neoadjuvant CRT on the anal sphincters was relatively trivial. The following sphincter-saving surgery resulted in a profound disruption of the anorectal function. Patients with rectal cancer should be consulted on the consequence of multimodal treatment.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Beyond survival: a comprehensive review of quality of life in rectal cancer patients
    Won Beom Jung
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 527.     CrossRef
  • Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341.     CrossRef
Review
Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer,Minimally invasive surgery,Surgical technique
Is Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision and Central Vascular Ligation Really Necessary for All Patients With Right-Sided Colon Cancer?
Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Hyeon-Min Cho, Je-Ho Jang, Chang-Nam Kim, Kil Yeon Lee, Suk-Hwan Lee, Jun-Gi Kim, On behalf of The Korean Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Study Group
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(6):434-444.   Published online December 8, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00955.0136
  • 5,934 View
  • 280 Download
  • 20 Web of Science
  • 23 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Colon cancer treatment is on the way to evolution over several decades. The minimally invasive surgery has improved postoperative short-term outcomes. Adjuvant chemotherapy has prolonged the survival of advanced colon cancer patients. Hohenberger proposed the noble concept of complete mesocolic excision (CME) which consists of 3 components: plane surgery, sufficient longitudinal bowel resection, and central vascular ligation (CVL). Mesocolic plane surgery shares the same surgical principle of total mesorectal excision, which is maintaining the intact mesothelial envelope. However, there remain debates about the extent of bowel resection and the level of CVL for maximizing lymph node dissection. There is no solid clinical evidence for the oncological necessity and benefit of extended radical dissection in right hemicolectomy. CME with CVL based on open surgery has been adopted in laparoscopic surgery. So, it is also necessary to look at how the CME could be transformed and successfully implanted in the laparoscopic era. Recent rapid advances in surgical technology and cancer biology are preparing for fundamental changes in cancer surgery. In this study, we reviewed the history, oncological necessity, and compatibility of CME for the right hemicolectomy in the laparoscopic era and outline the new perspectives on the evolution of cancer surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Optimal extent of lymph node dissection in clinical early-stage right colon cancer: a retrospective analysis
    Hyeung-min Park, Jaram Lee, Soo Young Lee, Suk Hee Heo, Yong Yeon Jeong, Hyeong Rok Kim, Chang Hyun Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2025; 108(1): 49.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a SICE (Società Italiana di Chirurgia Endoscopica e Nuove tecnologie) network prospective study on the approach to right colon lymphadenectomy in Italy: is there a standard?—CoDIG 2 (ColonDx Italian Group)
    G. Anania, M. Chiozza, A. Campagnaro, F. Bagolini, G. Resta, D. Azzolina, G. Silecchia, R. Cirocchi, A. Agrusa, D. Cuccurullo, M. Guerrieri, V. Adamo, M. Ammendola, P. Angelini, M. Annecchiarico, G. Aprea, F. Autori, G. Baldazzi, A. Balla, G. Baronio, G.
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(3): 1432.     CrossRef
  • Retrocaecal, supracolic and medial dissection (the RESUME approach) as an optimal surgical procedure for right‐sided colon cancer—A Video Vignette
    Hong‐min Ahn, Min Hyeong Jo, Mi Jeong Choi, Heung‐Kwon Oh, Duck‐Woo Kim, Sung‐Bum Kang
    Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(7): 1480.     CrossRef
  • Surgical treatment of right colon cancer
    A. A. Nevolskikh, V. A. Avdeenko, I. P. Reznik, T. P. Pochuev, R. F. Zibirov, S. A. Ivanov, A. D. Kaprin
    Siberian journal of oncology.2024; 23(3): 133.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping on Improving Diagnostic Values of CT D3 Lymph Node Staging for Right-Sided Colon Cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Tae Un Kim, Mi Sook Yun, ChangYeop Kim, In Young Lee, Su Bum Park, Dong-Hoon Shin, Gi Won Ha
    Cancers.2024; 16(20): 3496.     CrossRef
  • Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision
    Inci Sahin, Bilgi Baca
    Digestive Disease Interventions.2023; 07(01): 024.     CrossRef
  • A comparison of the efficacy and safety of natural orifice specimen extraction and conventional laparoscopic surgery in patients with sigmoid colon/high rectal cancer
    Qiang He, Jing Huang, Liyun Niu, Chunbao Zhai
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 127(7): 1160.     CrossRef
  • Effect of intracorporeal anastomosis on postoperative ileus after laparoscopic right colectomy
    Sangwoo Kim, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek, Young-Gil Son
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 104(3): 156.     CrossRef
  • Surgical and oncological outcomes of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (D3 + CME) for colon cancer: A prospective single-center cohort study
    Xiaolin Wu, Yixin Tong, Daxing Xie, Haijie Li, Jie Shen, Jianping Gong
    Surgical Endoscopy.2023; 37(8): 6107.     CrossRef
  • Incidence and survival of adenocarcinoma with mixed subtypes in patients with colorectal cancer
    Fan Zhang, Boqi Xu, Yao Peng, Zhongqi Mao, Shan Tong
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical Effectiveness of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping Using ICG for Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: A Prospective Case–Control Study
    Gyung Mo Son, Mi Sook Yun, In Young Lee, Sun Bin Im, Kyung Hee Kim, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Dong-Hoon Shin, Armaan M. Nazir, Gi Won Ha
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 4927.     CrossRef
  • Early-Onset Colon Cancer: A Narrative Review of Its Pathogenesis, Clinical Presentation, Treatment, and Prognosis
    Elvina C Lingas
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Do Laparoscopic Approaches Ensure Oncological Safety and Prognosis for Serosa-Exposed Colon Cancer? A Comparative Study against the Open Approach
    Ji-Hyun Seo, In-Ja Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(21): 5211.     CrossRef
  • Ausmaß und Technik der chirurgischen Resektion beim Kolonkarzinom
    Christoph Holmer
    coloproctology.2022; 44(3): 149.     CrossRef
  • Letter to the Editor Reply: ‘Mesocolon Excision in Right Colon Cancer: Is it a Real Oncological Procedure or a Mere Surgical Act?’
    Tamara Díaz Vico, Luis Joaquín García Flórez
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2022; 29(9): 5855.     CrossRef
  • Medical disease and ambulatory surgery, new insights in patient selection based on medical disease
    Thomas Fuchs-Buder, Jacob Rosenberg
    Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology.2022; 35(3): 385.     CrossRef
  • Is the oncological impact of vascular invasion more important in right colon cancer?
    Gyung Mo Son
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2022; 25(2): 49.     CrossRef
  • Ileal long-segment ischemia after the unintended ligation of variant ileal branch during laparoscopic right hemicolectomy
    Gyung Mo Son, Tae Un Kim, Dong-Hoon Shin, Joo-Young Na, In Young Lee, Shin Hoo Park
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2022; 25(3): 116.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early colon cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 558.     CrossRef
  • Direction of diagnosis and treatment improvement in colorectal cancer
    In Ja Park
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 540.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategy for Early Colon Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 203.     CrossRef
  • Robot-Assisted Colorectal Surgery
    Young Il Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • It Is a Pleasure to Announce the Issue Titled “Master Class 2021” in Annals of Coloproctology
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 349.     CrossRef
Original Article
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer
Influence of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol on Postoperative Inflammation and Short-term Postoperative Surgical Outcomes After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Heba Essam Jaloun, In Kyu Lee, Min Ki Kim, Na Young Sung, Suhail Abdullah Al Turkistani, Sun Min Park, Dae Youn Won, Sang Hyun Hong, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Yoon Suk Lee, Hae Myung Jeon
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):264-272.   Published online May 15, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.03.25
  • 8,561 View
  • 172 Download
  • 18 Web of Science
  • 18 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Many studies have shown that the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols improve postoperative surgical outcomes. The purpose of this study was to observe the effects on postoperative inflammatory markers and to explore the effects of a high degree of compliance and the use of epidural anesthesia on inflammation and surgical outcomes.
Methods
Four hundred patients underwent colorectal cancer surgery at 2 hospitals during 2 different periods, namely, from January 2006 to December 2009 and from January 2017 to July 2017. Data related to the patient’s clinicopathological features, inflammatory markers, percentage of compliance with elements of the ERAS protocol, and use of epidural anesthesia were collected from a prospectively maintained database.
Results
The complication rate and the length of hospital stay (LOS) were less in the ERAS group than in the conventional group (P = 0.005 and P ≤ 0.001, respectively). The postoperative white blood cell count and the duration required for leukocytes to normalize were reduced in patients following the ERAS protocol (P ≤ 0.001). Other inflammatory markers, such as lymphocyte count (P = 0.008), neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (P = 0.032), and C-reactive protein level (P ≤ 0.001), were lower in the ERAS protocol group. High compliance ( ≥ 70%) was strongly associated with the complication rate and the LOS (P = 0.008 and P ≤ 0.001, respectively).
Conclusion
ERAS protocols decrease early postoperative inflammation and improves short-term postoperative recovery outcomes such as complication rate and the LOS. High compliance ( ≥ 70%) with the ERAS protocol elements accelerates the positive effects of ERAS on surgical outcomes; however, the effect on inflammation was very small.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Challenging issues of implementing enhanced recovery after surgery programs in South Korea
    Soo-Hyuk Yoon, Ho-Jin Lee
    Anesthesia and Pain Medicine.2024; 19(1): 24.     CrossRef
  • Effect of different anesthetic modalities with multimodal analgesia on postoperative pain level in colorectal tumor patients
    Ji-Chun Tang, Jia-Wei Ma, Jin-Jin Jian, Jie Shen, Liang-Liang Cao
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2024; 16(2): 364.     CrossRef
  • Dysregulation of systemic immunity in colorectal cancer and its clinical applications as biomarkers and therapeutics
    Changqin Li, Jian Li
    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology.2024; 204: 104543.     CrossRef
  • The role of robotic-assisted surgery in the management of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chenxiong Zhang, Hao Tan, Han Xu, Jiaming Ding
    International Journal of Surgery.2024; 110(10): 6282.     CrossRef
  • Enhancing recovery and reducing inflammation: the impact of enhanced recovery after surgery recommendations on inflammatory markers in laparoscopic surgery—a scoping review
    Carlos Darcy Alves Bersot, Lucas Ferreira Gomes Pereira, Victor Gabriel Vieira Goncho, José Eduardo Guimarães Pereira, Luiz Fernando dos Reis Falcão
    Frontiers in Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Enhanced recovery pathway in open and minimally invasive colorectal cancer surgery: a prospective study on feasibility, compliance, and outcomes in a high-volume resource limited tertiary cancer center
    Martin Thomas, Vandana Agarwal, Ashwin DeSouza, Riddhi Joshi, Minal Mali, Karuna Panhale, Omkar K. Salvi, Reshma Ambulkar, Shailesh Shrikhande, Avanish Saklani
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Initial experience of abdominal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer using the da Vinci single port system
    Wed Alshalawi, Chul Seung Lee, In Kyeong Kim, Yoon Suk Lee
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2023; 26(4): 208.     CrossRef
  • Association between enrollment in an enhanced recovery program for colorectal cancer surgery and long‐term recurrence and survival
    Andres Zorrilla‐Vaca, Javier Ripolles‐Melchor, Ane Abad‐Motos, Inés Rubiera Mingu, Nekane Moreno‐Jurado, Fátima Martínez‐Durán, Isabel Pérez‐Martínez, Alfredo Abad‐Gurumeta, María L. FuenMayor‐Varela, Gabriel E. Mena, Michael C. Grant
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022; 125(8): 1269.     CrossRef
  • Implementation and improvement of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols for colorectal cancer surgery
    Bo Yoon Choi, Jung Hoon Bae, Chul Seung Lee, Seung Rim Han, Yoon Suk Lee, In Kyu Lee
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 102(4): 223.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery with Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine on Postoperative Stress Response of Patients with Gastrointestinal Tumors
    Haiping Zhao, Wenhui Sun, Tao Huang
    Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early colon cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 558.     CrossRef
  • Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer
    Sung Uk Bae
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 577.     CrossRef
  • Commentary: Preoperative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio predicts complications after esophageal resection that can be used as inclusion criteria for enhanced recovery after surgery
    Cheng Shen, Qiang Pu, Guowei Che
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategy for Early Colon Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 203.     CrossRef
  • Current Status and Future of Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Sung Uk Bae
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 221.     CrossRef
  • A propensity score-matched analysis of advanced energy devices and conventional monopolar device for colorectal cancer surgery: comparison of clinical and oncologic outcomes
    Woo Jin Song, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(5): 290.     CrossRef
  • Enhanced recovery after surgery: importance of compliance audits
    Jung Hoon Bae
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2021; 64(12): 820.     CrossRef
  • Effect of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocol After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
    Dae Ro Lim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(4): 209.     CrossRef
Review
Reconsideration of the Safety of Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery for Cancer
Gyung Mo Son, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Min Ki Kim, Jun-Gi Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(5):229-237.   Published online October 31, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.10.16
  • 4,468 View
  • 116 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
The oncological outcomes of laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery were evaluated in recent multicenter randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The MRC-CLASSIC, COLOR II, and COREAN trials found no differences in local recurrence or diseasefree survival rate between laparoscopic and open surgery. However, the noninferiority of laparoscopic surgery with respect to open surgery for rectal cancer was not established on statistical analysis in the ACOSOG Z6051 and the ALaCaRT trials. Quality of total mesorectal excision (TME) is one of the most important prognostic factors. Incomplete TME had unfavorable oncologic outcomes compared to complete TME. Although TME quality can be clearly identified on pathologic evaluation, there is controversy regarding the acceptable range of oncologically safe TME for laparoscopic surgery. It is not certain whether near-complete TME has an unfavorable oncologic impact and whether laparoscopic surgery with near-complete TME is an oncological threat. Therefore, the surgical community will be interested in the long-term outcomes and meta-analyses of ongoing large-scale RCTs. Laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery has been steadily improving its safety for oncology surgery, which has been reported consistently in various multicenter RCTs. To improve surgical quality, colorectal surgeons should choose the most appropriate surgical technique, including laparoscopic surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Operative and Survival Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Elderly and Very Elderly Patients: A Study in a Tertiary Hospital in South Korea
    Hugo Cuellar-Gomez, Siti Mayuha Rusli, María Esther Ocharan-Hernández, Tae-Hoon Lee, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Seon-Hahn Kim, Cruz Vargas-De-León, Yazhou He
    Journal of Oncology.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Evidenz in der minimal-invasiven onkologischen Chirurgie des Kolons und des Rektums
    Carolin Kastner, Joachim Reibetanz, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Armin Wiegering
    Der Chirurg.2021; 92(4): 334.     CrossRef
  • The Safety and Feasibility of Laparoscopic Surgery for Very Low Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Based on a Single Center’s Experience
    Hyuk-Jun Chung, Jun-Gi Kim, Hyung-Jin Kim, Hyeon-Min Cho, Bong-Hyeon Kye
    Biomedicines.2021; 9(11): 1720.     CrossRef
  • Reoperative laparoscopic rectal surgery: Another potential tool for the expert’s toolbox
    Marc D. Basson
    The American Journal of Surgery.2020; 219(6): 894.     CrossRef
Original Article
Prompt Management Is Most Important for Colonic Perforation After Colonoscopy
Hyun-Ho Kim, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Hyung-Jin Kim, Hyeon-Min Cho
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(5):228-231.   Published online October 28, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.5.228
  • 7,600 View
  • 78 Download
  • 18 Web of Science
  • 15 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The incidence of complications after colonoscopy is very low. The complications after colonoscopy that are of clinical concern are bleeding and perforation. The present study was conducted to determine the clinical outcomes and the risk factors of a colostomy or a colectomy after colonoscopic colon perforation.

Methods

From March 2009 to December 2012, the records of all patients who were treated for colorectal perforation after colonoscopy were reviewed retrospectively. The following parameters were evaluated: age, sex, purpose of colonoscopy, management of the colonic perforation, and interval from colonoscopy to the diagnosis of a colonic perforation. A retrospective analysis was performed to determine the risk factors associated with major surgery for the treatment of a colon perforation after colonoscopy.

Results

A total 27 patients were included in the present study. The mean age was 62 years, and 16 were males. The purpose of colonoscopy was diagnostic in 18 patients. The most common perforation site was the sigmoid colon. Colonic perforation was diagnosed during colonoscopy in 14 patients, just after colonoscopy in 5 patients, and 24 hours or more after colonoscopy in 8 patients. For the treatment of colonic perforation, endoscopic clipping was performed in 3 patients, primary closure in 15 patients, colon resection in 2 patients, Hartmann's procedures in 4 patients, and diverting colostomy in 3 patients. If the diagnosis of perforation after colonoscopy was delayed for more than 24 hours, the need for major treatment was increased significantly.

Conclusion

Although a colonic perforation after colonoscopy is rare, if the morbidity and the mortality associated with the colonic perforation are to be reduced, prompt diagnosis and management are very important.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical outcomes and risk factors of post-polypectomy microperforation in patients with colorectal neoplasia: a case-control study
    Seung Yong Shin, Min Soo Cho, Jinhoon Nam, Jie-Hyun Kim, Young Hoon Yoon, Hyojin Park, Jeonghyun Kang, Jae Jun Park
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Iatrogenic colon perforation during colonoscopy, diagnosis/treatment, and follow-up processes: A single-center experience
    Nihat Gülaydın, Raim İliaz, Atakan Özkan, A Hande Gökçe, Hanifi Önalan, Berrin Önalan, Aziz Arı
    Turkish Journal of Surgery.2022; 38(3): 221.     CrossRef
  • Multicenter retrospective evaluation of ileocecocolic perforations associated with diagnostic lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in dogs and cats
    Vanessa L. Woolhead, Jacqueline C. Whittemore, Sarah A. Stewart
    Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.2020; 34(2): 684.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Characteristics of Colonoscopic Perforation and Risk Factors for Complications After Surgical Treatment
    Liang Li, Bing Xue, Chunxia Yang, Zhongbo Han, Hongqiang Xie, Meng Wang
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2020; 30(11): 1153.     CrossRef
  • Treatment of colonoscopic perforation: outcomes from a major single tertiary institution
    Carolyn R. Chew, Justin M. C. Yeung, Ian G. Faragher
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2019; 89(5): 546.     CrossRef
  • Iatrogenic Colonic Perforations: Changing the Paradigm
    Jose Luis Ulla-Rocha, Angel Salgado, Raquel Sardina, Raquel Souto, Raquel Sanchez-Santos, Juan Turnes
    Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2019; 29(3): 173.     CrossRef
  • Concurrent retroperitoneal, mediastinal, cervical and subcutaneous emphysema secondary to iatrogenic sigmoid colon perforation
    Zehui Wu, Huaping Xu, Yisheng Zhang, Lianghui Shi
    Postgraduate Medical Journal.2019; 95(1125): 396.     CrossRef
  • Management of colonoscopic perforations: A systematic review
    Alexander T. Hawkins, Kenneth W. Sharp, Molly M. Ford, Roberta L. Muldoon, M. Benjamin Hopkins, Timothy M. Geiger
    The American Journal of Surgery.2018; 215(4): 712.     CrossRef
  • 2017 WSES guidelines for the management of iatrogenic colonoscopy perforation
    Nicola de’Angelis, Salomone Di Saverio, Osvaldo Chiara, Massimo Sartelli, Aleix Martínez-Pérez, Franca Patrizi, Dieter G. Weber, Luca Ansaloni, Walter Biffl, Offir Ben-Ishay, Miklosh Bala, Francesco Brunetti, Federica Gaiani, Solafah Abdalla, Aurelien Ami
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Management Outcomes of Colonoscopic Perforations Are Affected by the General Condition of the Patients
    Jae Ho Park, Kyung Jong Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(1): 16.     CrossRef
  • Managing a Colonoscopic Perforation in a Patient with No Abdominal Wall
    Jayan George, Michael Peirson, Samuel Birks, Paul Skinner
    Case Reports in Surgery.2018; 2018: 1.     CrossRef
  • Air and its Sonographic Appearance: Understanding the Artifacts
    Simran Buttar, Denrick Cooper, Patrick Olivieri, Michael Barca, Aaran B. Drake, Melvin Ku, Gabriel Rose, Sebastian D. Siadecki, Turandot Saul
    The Journal of Emergency Medicine.2017; 53(2): 241.     CrossRef
  • Colonoscopic Perforations, What is Our Experience in a Training Hospital?
    Abbas Aras, Ebru Oran, Hakan Seyit, Mehmet Karabulut, İlhan Gök, Halil Aliş
    Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2016; 26(1): 44.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Therapy in Crohnʼs Disease
    Min Chen, Bo Shen
    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2015; 21(9): 2222.     CrossRef
  • Importance of Prompt Diagnosis in the Management of Colonoscopic Perforation
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(5): 208.     CrossRef
Review
Overview of Radiation Therapy for Treating Rectal Cancer
Bong-Hyeon Kye, Hyeon-Min Cho
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(4):165-174.   Published online August 26, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.4.165
  • 5,260 View
  • 42 Download
  • 42 Web of Science
  • 36 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

A major outcome of importance for rectal cancer is local control. Parallel to improvements in surgical technique, adjuvant therapy regimens have been tested in clinical trials in an effort to reduce the local recurrence rate. Nowadays, the local recurrence rate has been reduced because of both good surgical techniques and the addition of radiotherapy. Based on recent reports in the literature, preoperative chemoradiotherapy is now considered the standard of care for patients with stages II and III rectal cancer. Also, short-course radiotherapy appears to provide effective local control and the same overall survival as more long-course chemoradiotherapy schedules and, therefore, may be an appropriate choice in some situations. Capecitabine is an acceptable alternative to infusion fluorouracil in those patients who are able to manage the responsibilities inherent in self-administered, oral chemotherapy. However, concurrent administration of oxaliplatin and radiotherapy is not recommended at this time. Radiation therapy has long been considered an important adjunct in the treatment of rectal cancer. Although no prospective data exist for several issues, we hope that in the near future, patients with rectal cancer can be treated by using the best combination of surgery, radiation therapy, and chemotherapy in near future.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Inflammatory bowel disease-associated colorectal cancer negatively affects surgery outcomes and health care costs
    Erryk S. Katayama, Selamawit Woldesenbet, Diamantis Tsilimigras, Muhammad Musaab Munir, Yutaka Endo, Emily Huang, Lisa Cunningham, Alan Harzman, Alessandra Gasior, Syed Husain, Mark Arnold, Matthew Kalady, Timothy M. Pawlik
    Surgery.2024; 176(1): 32.     CrossRef
  • Dose tracking assessment for magnetic resonance guided adaptive radiotherapy of rectal cancers
    Xin Xin, Bin Tang, Fan Wu, Jinyi Lang, Jie Li, Xianliang Wang, Min Liu, Qingxian Zhang, Xiongfei Liao, Feng Yang, Lucia Clara Orlandini
    Radiation Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Long-Term Effects on Gonadal Function After Treatment of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Christiane Anthon, Angela Vidal, Hanna Recker, Eva Piccand, Janna Pape, Susanna Weidlinger, Marko Kornmann, Tanya Karrer, Michael von Wolff
    Cancers.2024; 16(23): 4005.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: an observational single hospital study of 300 cases
    María Pilar del Gutiérrez Delgado, Santiago Mera Velasco, Jesús Damián Turiño Luque, Ivan González Poveda, Manuel Ruiz López, Julio Santoyo Santoyo
    Journal of Robotic Surgery.2022; 16(1): 179.     CrossRef
  • Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: A propensity-score matching analysis
    Tzu-Chun Chen, Jin-Tung Liang
    Journal of the Formosan Medical Association.2022; 121(8): 1532.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Reality and Treatment for Local Recurrence of Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
    Michał Jankowski, Manuela Las-Jankowska, Andrzej Rutkowski, Dariusz Bała, Dorian Wiśniewski, Karol Tkaczyński, Witold Kowalski, Iwona Głowacka-Mrotek, Wojciech Zegarski
    Medicina.2021; 57(3): 286.     CrossRef
  • Long‐term bowel function patient‐reported outcomes after successful chemoradiation for carcinoma of the anal canal
    Robert D. Shaw, Mark A. Eid, Eric D. Milanese, Srinivas J. Ivatury
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(6): 1480.     CrossRef
  • ANALYSIS OF PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR I APR IN ADVANCED STAGE MUCINOUS ADENOCARCINOMA OF RECTUM WITH KRUKENBERG OVARIAN METASTASIS IN OUR INSTITUTE
    Priyanka Tiwari, Himani Dahiya, S.C. Godera, Shyam Bihari Sharma
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH.2021; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Liposome technologies towards colorectal cancer therapeutics
    Rui Sang, Bradley Stratton, Alexander Engel, Wei Deng
    Acta Biomaterialia.2021; 127: 24.     CrossRef
  • Comparing neoadjuvant long-course chemoradiotherapy with short-course radiotherapy in rectal cancer
    Jian Wang, Yiwen Long, Kun Liu, Qian Pei, Hong Zhu
    BMC Gastroenterology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dose‑dependent expression of extracellular microRNAs in HCT116 colorectal cancer cells exposed to high‑dose‑rate ionising radiation
    Satoru Monzen, Tatsuya Ueno, Mitsuru Chiba, Yuki Morino, Yasushi Mariya, Andrzej Wojcik, Lovisa Lundholm
    Molecular and Clinical Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Adding Boost to Standard Neoadjuvant Radiation for Rectal Cancer Improves Likelihood of Complete Response
    Asya Ofshteyn, Katherine Bingmer, Jennifer Dorth, David Dietz, Emily Steinhagen, Sharon L. Stein
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2020; 24(7): 1655.     CrossRef
  • Application of Mitochondrially Targeted Nanoconstructs to Neoadjuvant X-ray-Induced Photodynamic Therapy for Rectal Cancer
    Wei Deng, Kelly J. McKelvey, Anna Guller, Alexey Fayzullin, Jared M. Campbell, Sandhya Clement, Abbas Habibalahi, Zofia Wargocka, Liuen Liang, Chao Shen, Viive Maarika Howell, Alexander Frank Engel, Ewa M. Goldys
    ACS Central Science.2020; 6(5): 715.     CrossRef
  • A critical literature review on the use of bellyboard devices to control small bowel dose for pelvic radiotherapy
    Matthew Hoffmann, Kim Waller, Andrew Last, Justin Westhuyzen
    Reports of Practical Oncology & Radiotherapy.2020; 25(4): 598.     CrossRef
  • Retrospective study of preoperative chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine versus capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for locally advanced rectal cancer
    Xiao-Hui Yang, Kai-Guo Li, Jun-Bao Wei, Chun-Hua Wu, Shi-Xiong Liang, Xian-Wei Mo, Jian-Si Chen, Wei-Zhong Tang, Song Qu
    Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Adipocytes protect fibroblasts from radiation-induced damage by adiponectin secretion
    Elizabeth A. Kosmacek, Rebecca E. Oberley-Deegan
    Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical Relevance and Practical Approach for Challenging Rectal Cancer MRI Findings
    Tyler Smith, Grace Zhu, Samuel Wilhite, Douglas Rogers
    Current Radiology Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Recent advances of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer: Future treatment perspectives
    Kimihiro Yamashita, Takeru Matsuda, Hiroshi Hasegawa, Junko Mukohyama, Akira Arimoto, Tomoko Tanaka, Masashi Yamamoto, Yoshiko Matsuda, Shingo Kanaji, Tetsu Nakamura, Yasuo Sumi, Satoshi Suzuki, Yoshihiro Kakeji
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2019; 3(1): 24.     CrossRef
  • Increased risk of pelvic fracture after radiotherapy in rectal cancer survivors: A propensity matched study
    Yu‐Mei Kang, Tze‐Fan Chao, Ti‐Hao Wang, Yu‐Wen Hu
    Cancer Medicine.2019; 8(8): 3639.     CrossRef
  • Recent Advances in Fertility Preservation and Counseling for Reproductive-Aged Women with Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Lisa M. Shandley, Laurie J. McKenzie
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2019; 62(6): 762.     CrossRef
  • Dual role of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Mediated Unfolded Protein Response Signaling Pathway in Carcinogenesis
    Natalia Siwecka, Wioletta Rozpędek, Dariusz Pytel, Adam Wawrzynkiewicz, Adam Dziki, Łukasz Dziki, J. Alan Diehl, Ireneusz Majsterek
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2019; 20(18): 4354.     CrossRef
  • Co-delivery of doxorubicin and TRAIL plasmid by modified PAMAM dendrimer in colon cancer cells, in vitro and in vivo evaluation
    Elham Pishavar, Mohammad Ramezani, Maryam Hashemi
    Drug Development and Industrial Pharmacy.2019; 45(12): 1931.     CrossRef
  • Optimal interval to surgery after chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer
    Ya Jing Chen, Zhen-Jie Zhao, Bang Wei Wang, Guang Zhuang Jing, Hai-Kun Ma, Xuemei Han, Jiancheng Wang, Zhen-Jie Zhao
    Medicine.2019; 98(45): e17669.     CrossRef
  • Progress in the surgery of rectal cancer
    Rudolf Schiessel
    Journal of Acute Disease.2018; 7(1): 26.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Abdominal Transanal Proctocolectomy with Coloanal Anastomosis Is a Good Surgical Option in Selective Patients with Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis Based on a Single Surgeon's Experience
    Bong-Hyeon Kye, Jun-Gi Kim, Hyeon-Min Cho, Hyung-Jin Kim, Chung-Soo Chun
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2018; 28(3): 269.     CrossRef
  • Dosimetric evaluation of magnetic resonance-generated synthetic CT for radiation treatment of rectal cancer
    Hesheng Wang, Kevin Du, Juliet Qu, Hersh Chandarana, Indra J. Das, Qinghui Zhang
    PLOS ONE.2018; 13(1): e0190883.     CrossRef
  • Feasibility of magnetic resonance imaging-only rectum radiotherapy with a commercial synthetic computed tomography generation solution
    Matteo Maspero, Marcus D. Tyyger, Rob H.N. Tijssen, Peter R. Seevinck, Martijn P.W. Intven, Cornelis A.T. van den Berg
    Physics and Imaging in Radiation Oncology.2018; 7: 58.     CrossRef
  • Long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of mid–low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy
    Dae Ro Lim, Sung Uk Bae, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
    Surgical Endoscopy.2017; 31(4): 1728.     CrossRef
  • Role of long non-coding RNA in tumor drug resistance
    Heng Deng, Jun Zhang, JinJun Shi, ZhengDong Guo, ChunRong He, Li Ding, Jin Hai Tang, Yong Hou
    Tumor Biology.2016; 37(9): 11623.     CrossRef
  • Identification of aberrant DNA methylation involved in chemoradiation-resistant HCT116 cells via methylation-specific microarray
    Wei Xiong, Yun-Feng Li, Shan Liu, Ting Chen, Hong-Tao Zhang, Zhi-Bin Yang, Ying-Ying Ding, De-Pei Gao, Guan-Shun Wang, Jian Dong
    Molecular & Cellular Toxicology.2016; 12(4): 345.     CrossRef
  • Fluorouracil-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with or without oxaliplatin for treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yong-Jing Yang, Ling Cao, Zhi-Wen Li, Ling Zhao, Hong-Fen Wu, Dan Yue, Jin-Lei Yang, Zhi-Rui Zhou, Shi-Xin Liu
    Oncotarget.2016; 7(29): 45513.     CrossRef
  • TNF rs1799964 as a Predictive Factor of Acute Toxicities in Chinese Rectal Cancer Patients Treated With Chemoradiotherapy
    Hui Zhang, Mengyun Wang, Tingyan Shi, Lijun Shen, Liping Liang, Yun Deng, Guichao Li, Ji Zhu, Yongxin Wu, Ming Fan, Weijuan Deng, Qingyi Wei, Zhen Zhang
    Medicine.2015; 94(45): e1955.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose-Rate Endorectal Brachytherapy as a Boost to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Distal Rectal Cancer: A Phase-II Clinical Trial
    Shapour Omidvari, Shadi Zohourinia, Mansour Ansari, Leila Ghahramani, Mohammad Zare-Bandamiri, Ahmad Mosalaei, Niloofar Ahmadloo, Saeedeh Pourahmad, Hamid Nasrolahi, Sayed Hasan Hamedi, Mohammad Mohammadianpanah
    Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(4): 123.     CrossRef
  • Microarray Analysis of Long Non-coding RNA Expression Profile Associated with 5-Fluorouracil-Based Chemoradiation Resistance in Colorectal Cancer Cells
    Wei Xiong, Yong-Xin Jiang, Yi-Qin Ai, Shan Liu, Xing-Rao Wu, Jian-Guo Cui, Ji-Yong Qin, Yan Liu, Yao-Xiong Xia, Yun-He Ju, Wen-Jie He, Yong Wang, Yun-Fen Li, Yu Hou, Li Wang, Wen-Hui Li
    Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2015; 16(8): 3395.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances in multidisciplinary approach for rectal cancer
    Eiji Oki, Koji Ando, Yuta Kasagi, Yoko Zaitsu, Masahiko Sugiyama, Yuichiro Nakashima, Hideto Sonoda, Kippei Ohgaki, Hiroshi Saeki, Yoshihiko Maehara
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2015; 20(4): 641.     CrossRef
  • Short-course Versus Long-course Preoperative Radiotherapy plus Delayed Surgery in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer: a Meta-analysis
    Shi-Xin Liu, Zhi-Rui Zhou, Ling-Xiao Chen, Yong-Jing Yang, Zhi-De Hu, Tian-Song Zhang
    Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention.2015; 16(14): 5755.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Delorme's Procedure for Complete Rectal Prolapse: Does It Still Have It's Own Role?
Sooho Lee, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Hyung-Jin Kim, Hyeon-Min Cho, Jun-Gi Kim
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(1):13-18.   Published online February 29, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.13
  • 10,449 View
  • 40 Download
  • 8 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Although there are more than a hundred techniques, including the transabdominal and the perineal approaches, for the repair of the rectal prolapsed, none of them is perfect. The best repair should be chosen not only to correct the prolapse but also to restore defecatory function and to improve fecal incontinence throughout the patient's lifetime. The aim of this retrospective review is to evaluate clinical outcomes of the Delorme's procedure for the management of the complete rectal prolapse.

Methods

A total of 19 patients (13 females and 6 males) with complete rectal prolapses were treated by using the Delorme's procedure in St. Vincent's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, from February 1997 to February 2007. Postoperative anal incontinence was evaluated using the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score.

Results

All 19 patients had incontinence to liquid stool, solid stool, and/or flatus preoperatively. Three (15.8%) patients reported recurrence of the rectal prolapse (at 6, 18, 29 months, respectively, after the operation). Information on postoperative incontinence was available for 16 of the 19 patients. Twelve of the 16 patients (75%) reported improved continence (5 [31.3%] were improved and 7 [43.7%] completely recovered from incontinence) while 4 patients had unchanged incontinence symptoms. One (6.3%) patient who did not have constipation preoperatively developed constipation after the operation.

Conclusion

The Delorme's procedure is associated with a marked improvement in anal continence, relatively low recurrence rates, and low incidence of postoperative constipation. This allows us to conclude that this procedure still has its own role in selected patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Transanal rectopexy for external rectal prolapse
    Shantikumar Dhondiram Chivate, Meghana Vinay Chougule, Rahul Shantikumar Chivate, Palak Harshuk Thakrar
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(6): 415.     CrossRef
  • Epidemiological trends in surgery for rectal prolapse in England 2001–2012: an adult hospital population‐based study
    Y. El‐Dhuwaib, A. Pandyan, C. H. Knowles
    Colorectal Disease.2020; 22(10): 1359.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Treatment of Rectal Prolapse in the Laparoscopic Era; A Review of the Literature
    Akira Tsunoda
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2020; 4(3): 89.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy vs Delorme's operation in management of complete rectal prolapse: a prospective randomized study
    S. H. Emile, H. Elbanna, M. Youssef, W. Thabet, W. Omar, A. Elshobaky, T. M. Abd El‐Hamed, M. Farid
    Colorectal Disease.2017; 19(1): 50.     CrossRef
  • Perineal resectional procedures for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse: A systematic review of the literature
    Sameh Hany Emile, Hossam Elfeki, Mostafa Shalaby, Ahmad Sakr, Pierpaolo Sileri, Steven D. Wexner
    International Journal of Surgery.2017; 46: 146.     CrossRef
  • Delorme’s Procedure for Complete Rectal Prolapse: A Study of Recurrence Patterns in the Long Term
    Carlos Placer, Jose M. Enriquez-Navascués, Ander Timoteo, Garazi Elorza, Nerea Borda, Lander Gallego, Yolanda Saralegui
    Surgery Research and Practice.2015; 2015: 1.     CrossRef
  • Surgical treatments for rectal prolapse: how does a perineal approach compare in the laparoscopic era?
    Monica T. Young, Mehraneh D. Jafari, Michael J. Phelan, Michael J. Stamos, Steven Mills, Alessio Pigazzi, Joseph C. Carmichael
    Surgical Endoscopy.2015; 29(3): 607.     CrossRef
  • Simultaneous Delorme's procedure and inter-sphinteric prosthetic implant for the treatment of rectal prolapse and faecal incontinence: Preliminary experience and literature review
    Emanuel Cavazzoni, Emanuele Rosati, Valentina Zavagno, Luigina Graziosi, Annibale Donini
    International Journal of Surgery.2015; 14: 45.     CrossRef
Treatment of Right Colonic Diverticulitis: The Role of Nonoperative Treatment
Ma Ru Kim, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Hyung Jin Kim, Hyeon-Min Cho, Seong Taek Oh, Jun-Gi Kim
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(6):402-406.   Published online December 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.6.402
  • 3,974 View
  • 40 Download
  • 24 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the value of nonoperative treatment for right-sided colonic diverticulitis.

Methods

One hundred fifty-eight patients with right-sided colonic diverticulitis were evaluated. Clinical history, physical and radiologic findings, and treatments were reviewed retrospectively. Also, additional episodes and treatment modalities were checked.

Results

Our patients were classified according to treatment modality; 135 patients (85.4%) underwent conservative treatment, including antibiotics and bowel rest, and 23 patients (14.6%) underwent surgery. The mean follow-up length was 37.3 months, and 17 patients (17.5%) underwent recurrent right-sided colonic diverticulitis. Based on treatment modality, including surgery and antibiotics, no significant differences in the clinical features and the recurrence rates were noted between the two groups.

Conclusion

Conservative management with bowel rest and antibiotics could be considered as a safe and effective option for treating right-sided colonic diverticulitis. This treatment option for right-sided colonic diverticulitis, even if the disease is complicated, may be the treatment of choice.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison of surgical management and outcomes of acute right colic and sigmoid diverticulitis: a French national retrospective cohort study
    E. Karam, C. Sabbagh, L. Beyer-Bergeot, P. Zerbib, V. Bridoux, G. Manceau, Y. Panis, E. Buscail, A. Venara, I. Khaoudy, M. Gaillard, M. Viennet, A. Thobie, B. Menahem, C. Eveno, C. Bonnel, J.-Y. Mabrut, B. Badic, C. Godet, Y. Eid, E. Duchalais, Z. Lakkis,
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Right-sided diverticulitis in a Western population
    Adi Rov, Anat Ben-Ari, Eyal Barlev, David Pelcman, Sergio Susmalian, Haim Paran
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(6): 1251.     CrossRef
  • Investigation of the clinical features and recurrence patterns of acute right-sided colonic diverticulitis: A retrospective cohort study
    Moon Young Oh, Rumi Shin, Seung Chul Heo, Han-Ki Lim, Min Jung Kim, Ji Won Park, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park
    Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2022; 81: 104431.     CrossRef
  • Emergency surgery comparison of right versus left acute colonic diverticulitis: A 10-year outcome analysis
    JS Tsang, Chi Chung Foo, Jeremy Yip, Hok Kwok Choi, Wai Lun Law, Oswens Siu Hung Lo
    The Surgeon.2021; 19(3): 150.     CrossRef
  • Conservative treatment of uncomplicated right-sided diverticulitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jun Ho Lee, Byung Kyu Ahn, Kang Hong Lee
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(8): 1791.     CrossRef
  • Conventional-Dose CT Versus 2-mSv CT for Right Colonic Diverticulitis as an Alternate Diagnosis of Appendicitis: Secondary Analysis of Large Pragmatic Randomized Trial Data
    Hae Young Kim, Seungjae Lee, Dong Hwan Kim, Yousun Ko, Ji Hoon Park, Ara Ko, Seok Min Jeong, Sung Bin Park, Kyoung Ho Lee
    American Journal of Roentgenology.2021; 217(5): 1113.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic diverticulectomy versus non-operative treatment for uncomplicated right colonic diverticulitis
    Le Huy Luu, Nguyen Lam Vuong, Vo Thi Hong Yen, Do Thi Thu Phuong, Bui Khac Vu, Nguyen Viet Thanh, Nguyen Thien Khanh, Nguyen Van Hai
    Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(5): 2019.     CrossRef
  • Diverticulitis aguda del ángulo hepático simulando un cuadro de colecistitis aguda
    M. Gonzalez-Urquijo, A. Baca-Arzaga, G. Lozano-Balderas
    Revista de Gastroenterología de México.2020; 85(4): 484.     CrossRef
  • Short‐ and Long‐Term Outcomes of Right‐Sided Diverticulitis: Over 15 Years of North American Experience
    Jesse Zuckerman, Richard Garfinkle, Carol‐Ann Vasilevksy, Gabriela Ghitulescu, Julio Faria, Nancy Morin, Marylise Boutros
    World Journal of Surgery.2020; 44(6): 1994.     CrossRef
  • Acute diverticulitis of the hepatic flexure mimicking acute cholecystitis
    M. Gonzalez-Urquijo, A. Baca-Arzaga, G. Lozano-Balderas
    Revista de Gastroenterología de México (English Edition).2020; 85(4): 484.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic repair of perforated cecal diverticulitis
    K. Spacil, J. Meyer, M. Stehr, M. Schäfer
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports.2019; 42: 17.     CrossRef
  • Long-term outcome and management of right colonic diverticulitis in western countries: Multicentric Retrospective Study
    L. Courtot, V. Bridoux, Z. Lakkis, G. Piessen, G. Manceau, A. Mulliri, G. Meurette, A. Bouayed, A. Vénara, B. Blanc, N. Tabchouri, E. Salamé, M. Ouaïssi
    Journal of Visceral Surgery.2019; 156(4): 296.     CrossRef
  • Résultats à long terme et prise en charge des diverticulites du colon droit dans les pays occidentaux : étude rétrospective multicentrique
    L. Courtot, V. Bridoux, Z. Lakkis, G. Piessen, G. Manceau, A. Mulliri, G. Meurette, A. Bouayed, A. Vénara, B. Blanc, N. Tabchouri, E. Salamé, M. Ouaïssi
    Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale.2019; 156(4): 322.     CrossRef
  • A Rare Case of Acute Right-Sided Colonic Diverticulitis Presenting as Pancreatitis
    Maria de Lourdes Ladino Sturchler, Evan A. Rusoja, Arun Nagdev, Barry C. Simon
    The Journal of Emergency Medicine.2018; 54(4): e77.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of conservative management in patients with right colonic diverticulitis
    Gi Won Ha, Min Ro Lee, Jong Hun Kim
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2017; 87(6): 467.     CrossRef
  • Intraoperative diagnosis of solitary cecal diverticulum not requiring surgery: is appendectomy indicated?
    Renol M. Koshy, Abdelrahman Abusabeib, Saif Al-Mudares, Mohamed Khairat, Adriana Toro, Isidoro Di Carlo
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and Management of Right Colonic Diverticular Disease: A Review
    Francesco Ferrara, Jesús Bollo, Letizia V. Vanni, Eduardo M. Targarona
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2016; 94(10): 553.     CrossRef
  • Diagnóstico y tratamiento de la enfermedad diverticular del colon derecho: revisión de conjunto
    Francesco Ferrara, Jesús Bollo, Letizia V Vanni, Eduardo M Targarona
    Cirugía Española.2016; 94(10): 553.     CrossRef
  • Diverticular Disease: Guidelines of the German Society for Gastroenterology, Digestive and Metabolic Diseases and the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery
    Wolfgang Kruis, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Ludger Leifeld
    Digestion.2014; 90(3): 190.     CrossRef
  • Non-operative treatment of right-sided colonic diverticulitis has good long-term outcome: a review of 226 patients
    Ker-Kan Tan, Jiayi Wong, Richard Sim
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2013; 28(6): 849.     CrossRef
  • Visceral Obesity as a Risk Factor for Left-Sided Diverticulitis in Japan: A Multicenter Retrospective Study
    Eiji Yamada, Hidenori Ohkubo, Takuma Higurashi, Eiji Sakai, Hiroki Endo, Hirokazu Takahashi, Eri Uchida, Emi Tanida, Nobuyoshi Izumi, Akira Kanesaki, Yasuo Hata, Tetsuya Matsuura, Nobutaka Fujisawa, Kazuto Komatsu, Shin Maeda, Atsushi Nakajima
    Gut and Liver.2013; 7(5): 532.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors for Severe Diverticulitis in Computed Tomography-Confirmed Acute Diverticulitis in Korea
    Nark-Soon Park, Yoon Tae Jeen, Hyuk Soon Choi, Eun Sun Kim, Young Jin Kim, Bora Keum, Yeon Seok Seo, Hoon Jai Chun, Hong Sik Lee, Soon Ho Um, Chang Duck Kim, Ho Sang Ryu
    Gut and Liver.2013; 7(4): 443.     CrossRef
  • The Clinical Factors for Predicting Severe Diverticulitis in Korea: A Comparison with Western Countries
    Sun Young Kim, Tae Hoon Oh, Ji Young Seo, Tae Joo Jeon, Dong Dae Seo, Won Chang Shin, Won Choong Choi, Myeong Ja Jeong
    Gut and Liver.2012; 6(1): 78.     CrossRef
  • Special Situations in the Management of Colonic Diverticular Disease
    Yoori Lee, Todd Francone
    Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2011; 22(3): 180.     CrossRef
Surgical Resection for Lung Metastases from Colorectal Cancer
Hyung Jin Kim, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Jae Im Lee, Sang Chul Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, In Kyu Lee, Won Kyung Kang, Hyeon-Min Cho, Seok Whan Moon, Seong Taek Oh
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(5):354-358.   Published online October 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.5.354
  • 4,077 View
  • 35 Download
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The lung is the second most common site of metastasis from colorectal cancer. Of all patients who undergo a curative resection for colorectal cancer, 10% to 15% will develop lung metastasis. As a hepatic resection of colorectal liver metastases results in improved survival, many reports have suggested that a pulmonary resection of a colorectal lung metastasis would also improve survival. The aim of this study was to analyze the postoperative outcomes of and the prognostic factors for a surgical resection of a lung metastasis.

Methods

Between August 1997 and March 2006, 27 patients underwent surgical resections for colorectal lung metastases at Seoul St. Mary's hospital. A retrospective review of patients' characteristics and various tumor factors was performed.

Results

The mean interval between colorectal resection and lung metastasis was 24.0 ± 15.1 months. The overall 3- and 5-year survival rates were 76.5% and 22.2%, respectively. The mean follow-up after pulmonary resection was 39.5 ± 21.6 months (range, 3.3 to 115 months). Except for the existence of hilar-lymph-node metastasis (P < 0.001), no risk factors that we studied were statistically significant. Two patients had hilar-lymph-node metastasis. They survived for only for 3.3- and 11.6-months, respectively.

Conclusion

In our study, we found that a pulmonary resection for metastases from colorectal cancer may improve survival in selected patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic factors of para-aortic lymph node metastasis from colorectal cancer in highly selected patients undergoing para-aortic lymph node dissection
    Shin Emoto, Yosuke Fukunaga, Manabu Takamatsu, Hiroshi Kawachi, Shuhei Sano, Tetsuro Tominaga, Toshiki Mukai, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Toshiya Nagasaki, Takashi Akiyoshi, Tsuyoshi Konishi, Satoshi Nagayama, Masashi Ueno
    Surgery Today.2024; 54(4): 356.     CrossRef
  • The Determinants of Long-Term Outcomes After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Literature Review
    Olorungbami K Anifalaje, Charles Ojo, Oluwaseyi T Balogun, Fikayo A Ayodele, Abeeb Azeez, Shirley Gabriels
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Distant Lung Recurrence of Rectal Cancer 20 Years After Primary Surgery
    Sreekanthan Gobishangar, Sivakumaran Gobinath, Antony J Thanenthiran, Subramaniyam Bakeerathan
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pulmonary metastasectomy with lymphadenectomy for colorectal pulmonary metastases: A systematic review
    Martijn van Dorp, Jelle Egbert Bousema, Bart Torensma, Christian Dickhoff, Frank Jozef Christiaan van den Broek, Wilhelmina Hendrika Schreurs, Michel Gonzalez, Geert Kazemier, David Jonathan Heineman
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022; 48(1): 253.     CrossRef
  • Safety and efficacy of combined resection of colorectal peritoneal and liver metastases
    Stephanie Downs-Canner, Yongli Shuai, Lekshmi Ramalingam, James F. Pingpank, Matthew P. Holtzman, Herbert J. Zeh, David L. Bartlett, Haroon A. Choudry
    Journal of Surgical Research.2017; 219: 194.     CrossRef
  • CT-guided percutaneous laser ablation of metastatic lung cancer: three cases report and literature review
    Qiyu Zhao, Guo Tian, Fen Chen, Liyun Zhong, Tian’an Jiang
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(2): 2187.     CrossRef
  • Simultaneous Laparoscopic Resection for Synchronous Pulmonary Metastases of Colorectal Cancers
    Byung-Kwon Ahn
    Gastroenterology & Hepatology: Open Access.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
Clinicopathological Features of Primary Jejunoileal Tumors
Chang Hyun Kim, Bong Hyeon Kye, Jae Im Lee, Soo Hong Kim, Hyung Jin Kim, Won Kyung Kang, Seong Taek Oh
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(5):334-338.   Published online October 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.5.334
  • 3,528 View
  • 23 Download
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Tumors of the small bowel are rare, accounting for about 3-6% of all gastrointestinal neoplasms, though they cover more than 90% of the intestinal surface. However, diagnosis and treatment are difficult and present an ongoing challenge for both gastrointestinal surgeons and gastroenterologists. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical features of small bowel tumors.

Methods

Between November 1994 and November 2007, 81 patients underwent treatments for primary tumors in the jejuno-ileal region at the Department of Surgery, Kangnam St. Mary's Hospital, the Catholic University of Korea. A retrospective review of the patients' characteristics and variable tumor factors was performed.

Results

The mean age of the patients was 53.2 years with 48 men and 33 women. The most common symptom was abdominal pain (59.3%), followed by bleeding (22.2%) and an abdominal mass (6.2%). We found that the patients with ileal tumors complained mainly of abdominal pain (72.9%) whereas the patients with jejunal tumors presented with gastrointestinal bleeding (36.4%) (P = 0.048). Seventy-six of the 81 patients (93.8%) had malignant tumors, including 40 (49.4%) gastrointestinal stromal tumors, 26 (32.1%) lymphomas and 5 (6.2%) adenocarcinomas. No postoperative mortalities were observed. The overall 5-year survival rate of the patients with malignant small bowel tumors was 31.8%.

Conclusion

Because the clinical features of a primary tumor of the small bowel are obscure and its diagnosis is difficult, maintaining a high degree of suspicion and recognizing the possibility of a primary small bowel tumor are important.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Symptoms Contributing to the Diagnosis of Small Bowel Tumors
    Kozo Tsuruta, Hidetoshi Takedatsu, Shinichiro Yoshioka, Masahiro Yoshikai, Kensuke Tomiyasu, Masaru Morita, Kotaro Kuwaki, Keiichi Mitsuyama, Takumi Kawaguchi
    Digestion.2023; 104(6): 430.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathologic features, surgical treatments and outcomes of small bowel tumors
    Anh Doanh Nguyen, Tu Hoang Le
    Vietnam Journal of Endolaparoscopic Surgey.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathological Features of Small Bowel Tumors Diagnosed by Video Capsule Endoscopy and Balloon-Assisted Enteroscopy: A Single Center Experience
    Ah Young Yoo, Beom Jae Lee, Won Shik Kim, Seong Min Kim, Seung Han Kim, Moon Kyung Joo, Hyo Jung Kim, Jong-Jae Park
    Clinical Endoscopy.2021; 54(1): 85.     CrossRef
  • Small Bowel Adenocarcinoma – Report of Two Cases and Review of Literature
    Philip Umman, Vineeth Adiyodi, Chanchal Narayan
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2013; 75(2): 123.     CrossRef
  • Les tumeurs malignes primitives de l’intestin grêle : à propos de 11 cas
    A. Farouk, A. Diffaa, R. Hafidi, F. Hlili, K. Krati
    Journal Africain d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie.2012; 6(4): 284.     CrossRef
  • A Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor Presenting as an Emergency: a Case Report
    Konstantinos Bouliaris, Aikaterini Michopoulou, Konstantinos Spanos, Vassilios Simopoulos, Ioannis Bolanis, Stylianos Germanos
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2012; 43(S1): 178.     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP