Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
4 "Christopher John Young"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Display
Original Articles
Malignant disease, Functional outcomes
The Benefits of Colorectal Surgery Surveys in Australia and New Zealand
Auerilius Erastus Ricardo Hamilton, Amelia Alice Lin, Christopher John Young
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(2):102-111.   Published online April 30, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.09.17
  • 5,115 View
  • 64 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Pertaining to the Colorectal Surgery Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSSANZ) Executive and Research Support Committee, this study aimed to assess the usefulness and outcomes of surveys sent out by the society to its members.
Methods
From 2009 to 2017, CSSANZ members received 38 surveys, most of which were distributed from within the society, and a few of which originated from other affiliated groups. Surveys were categorised by type, topics, times required for completion, delivery method, response rates, and advancement to publication.
Results
Of 38 surveys, 20 (53%) were published and 18 remain unpublished. Four surveys were distributed annually on average, with 2.2 published annually on average, with a mean impact factor of 2.41 ± 1.55. Mean time to publication was 31 ± 17 months. Surveys contributed to 13 publications (34%). The most common survey topics were rectal cancer decisionmaking, in 6 publications (16%), preoperative assessment of colorectal patients, in 5 publications (13%), and anal physiology: continence and defaecation, in 4 publications (11%). Publication of surveys was not related to the number of surveys distributed per year, the number of questions per survey, or the time required by respondents to complete the surveys.
Conclusion
Most of the CSSANZ-distributed surveys resulted in publications, and one third of the surveys contributed to higher degrees obtained by investigators. These surveys aid research into areas that are otherwise difficult to assess, often indicating areas for future research.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Current approaches to the surgical management of Crohn’s disease in Australia and New Zealand
    Sophie Zheng, Aleksandra Edmundson, David A. Clark
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Survey Research Among Neurosurgeons: A Bibliometric Review of the Characteristics, Quality, and Citation Predictors of the Top 50 Most-Influential Publications in the Neurosurgical Literature
    Abdulhakim B Jamjoom, Abdulhadi Y Gahtani, Jude M Jamjoom, Belal M Sharab, Omar M Jamjoom, Moajeb T AlZahrani
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Geographical Variation in the Use of Diverting Loop Ileostomy in Australia and New Zealand Colorectal Surgeons
    David A. Clark, Bree Stephensen, Aleksandra Edmundson, Daniel Steffens, Michael Solomon
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(5): 337.     CrossRef
Benign GI diease,Benign diesease & IBD,Complication,Surgical technique
Triple-Staple Technique Effectively Reduces Operating Time for Rectal Anastomosis
Marie Shella De Robles, Christopher John Young
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(1):16-20.   Published online February 5, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.06.30
  • 6,632 View
  • 166 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 10 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Stapled anastomotic techniques to the distal rectum have gained widespread acceptance due to their procedural advantages. Various modifications in the stapling techniques have evolved since their inception. The triple-staple technique utilizing stapled closure of both the proximal colon and distal rectal stump provides a rapid and secure colorectal anastomosis. The aims of this study were to determine the safety and efficacy of the triple-staple technique and to compare the clinical outcomes with a historical control group for which the conventional double-staple technique had been performed.
Methods
One hundred consecutive patients operated on by a single surgeon were included in the study; 50 patients who underwent a double-staple (DSA) procedure and 50 patients undergoing triple-staple anastomosis (TSA).
Results
The most common indication for surgery in both groups was rectal cancer followed by diverticular disease and distal sigmoid cancer. There was no significant difference in number of patients requiring loop ileostomy formation in the groups (TSA, 56.0% vs. DSA, 68.0%; P = 0.621). The mean operating time for the TSA group was significantly shorter compared to that of the DSA group (TSA, 242.8 minutes vs. DSA, 306.1 minutes; P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in complication rate (TSA, 40% vs. DSA, 50%; P = 0.315) or length of hospital stay between the two groups (TSA, 11.3 days vs. DSA, 13.0 days; P = 0.246). Postoperative complications included anastomotic leak, prolonged ileus, bleeding, wound infection, and pelvic collection.
Conclusion
The triple-staple technique is a safe alternative to double-staple anastomosis after anterior resection and effectively shortens operating time.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Single versus double stapled anastomosis in natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) laparoscopic anterior resection
    Abdus Salam Raju, Seyed Mohammad Javad Taghavi, Andrew James Gilmore
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2025; 95(6): 1198.     CrossRef
  • Sphincter-preserving surgical techniques in low rectal cancer management: A systematic review of contemporary evidence
    Song Wang, A-Jian Li, Hui-Hong Jiang, Yin Lin, Hai-Bo Ding
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
    Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
    The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • Double-row staple technology versus triple-row staple technology for colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Tyler McKechnie, Victoria Shi, Elena Huang, Bright Huo, Aristithes Doumouras, Nalin Amin, Cagla Eskicioglu, Dennis Hong
    Surgery.2024; 176(3): 633.     CrossRef
  • The Colorectal Anastomosis: A Timeless Challenge
    Alexander A. Gaidarski III, Marco Ferrara
    Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2023; 36(01): 011.     CrossRef
  • Fluorescence-guided colorectal surgery: applications, clinical results, and protocols
    Jin-Min Jung, In Ja Park, Eun Jung Park, Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 252.     CrossRef
  • Preventing Anastomotic Leakage, a Devastating Complication of Colorectal Surgery
    Hyun Gu Lee
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer
    Sung Uk Bae
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 577.     CrossRef
  • Current Status and Future of Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Sung Uk Bae
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 221.     CrossRef
  • Effort to Improve Rectal Anastomosis: the Triple-Stapled Technique for Rectal Anastomosis
    Sung Il Kang
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(1): 1.     CrossRef
Effects of Intraoperative Insufflation With Warmed, Humidified CO2 during Abdominal Surgery: A Review
Ju Yong Cheong, Anil Keshava, Paul Witting, Christopher John Young
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(3):125-137.   Published online June 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.09.26
  • 10,646 View
  • 176 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 13 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
During a laparotomy, the peritoneum is exposed to the cold, dry ambient air of the operating room (20°C, 0%–5% relative humidity). The aim of this review is to determine whether the use of humidified and/or warmed CO2 in the intraperitoneal environment during open or laparoscopic operations influences postoperative outcomes.
Methods
A review was performed in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The PubMed, OVID MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Embase databases were searched for articles published between 1980 and 2016 (October). Comparative studies on humans or nonhuman animals that involved randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or prospective cohort studies were included. Both laparotomy and laparoscopic studies were included. The primary outcomes identified were peritoneal inflammation, core body temperature, and postoperative pain.
Results
The literature search identified 37 articles for analysis, including 30 RCTs, 7 prospective cohort studies, 23 human studies, and 14 animal studies. Four studies found that compared with warmed/humidified CO2, cold, dry CO2 resulted in significant peritoneal injury, with greater lymphocytic infiltration, higher proinflammatory cytokine levels and peritoneal adhesion formation. Seven of 15 human RCTs reported a significantly higher core body temperature in the warmed, humidified CO2 group than in the cold, dry CO2 group. Seven human RCTs found lower postoperative pain with the use of humidified, warmed CO2.
Conclusion
While evidence supporting the benefits of using humidified and warmed CO2 can be found in the literature, a large human RCT is required to validate these findings.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Performance of intraoperative surgical smoke management technologies for laparoscopic surgery: A comparative in-vivo pig study
    Daniel Göhler, Levon Aslanyan, Kathrin Oelschlägel, Petru Bucur, Jonathan Buggisch, Nadia Azhari, Andreas Rudolph, Sébastien Roger, Michael Stintz, Dirk Bausch, Cédric Demtröder, Mehdi Ouaissi, Urs Giger-Pabst
    Journal of Aerosol Science.2024; 177: 106309.     CrossRef
  • Does intra‐operative humidification with warmed CO2 reduce surgical site infection in open colorectal surgery? A randomized control trial
    Asiri Arachchi, Alice Lee, Manisha Metlapalli, Ellathios Antoniou, Ruben Rajan, Vignesh Narasimhan, Ashray Rajagopalan, Seraphina Key, William M. K. Teoh, Thang Chien Nguyen, James Tow‐Hing Lim, Hanumant Chouhan, Bruce P. Waxman, Julian A. Smith
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2023; 93(4): 970.     CrossRef
  • The effects of CO2 pneumoperitoneum at different temperature and humidity on hemodynamic and respiratory parameters and postoperative pain in gynecological laparoscopic surgery: A prospective randomized controlled study
    Ilkben Gunusen, Ali Akdemir, Asuman Sargın, Semra Karaman
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2022; 45(1): 154.     CrossRef
  • Incidence of inadvertent perioperative hypothermia in pediatric laparoscopic surgery: a prospective observational single-center study.
    Recai DAĞLI, Ülgen ÇELTİK, Fatma ÇELİK, Zeynel Abidin ERBESLER, Zeynep KÖYLÜ
    Ahi Evran Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of Warmed and Humidified CO2 Surgical Site Insufflation in a Novel Experimental Model of Magnetic Compression Colonic Anastomosis
    Francesco Marchegiani, Eric Noll, Pietro Riva, Seong-Ho Kong, Paola Saccomandi, Giorgia Vita, Véronique Lindner, Izzie Jacques Namer, Jacques Marescaux, Pierre Diemunsch, Michele Diana
    Surgical Innovation.2021; 28(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • Does the Laminar Airflow System Affect the Development of Perioperative Hypothermia? A Randomized Clinical Trial
    Recai Dagli, Fatma Çelik, Hüseyin Özden, Serdar Şahin
    HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal.2021; 14(3): 202.     CrossRef
  • Randomized clinical trial of the effect of intraoperative humidified carbon dioxide insufflation in open laparotomy for colorectal resection
    J. Y. Cheong, B. Chami, G. M. Fong, X. S. Wang, A. Keshava, C. J. Young, P. Witting
    BJS Open.2020; 4(1): 45.     CrossRef
  • The Pathogenesis and Prevention of Port-Site Metastasis in Gynecologic Oncology


    Qianqian Gao, Ling Guo, Bo Wang
    Cancer Management and Research.2020; Volume 12: 9655.     CrossRef
  • Morpheus and the Underworld—Interventions to Reduce the Risks of Opioid Use After Surgery: ORADEs, Dependence, Cancer Progression, and Anastomotic Leakage
    Robert Beaumont Wilson
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2019; 23(6): 1240.     CrossRef
  • Effects of a multifaceted individualized pneumoperitoneum strategy in elderly patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery
    Liping Liu, Na Lv, Chunmiao Hou
    Medicine.2019; 98(14): e15112.     CrossRef
  • Single‐incision laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's operation through the stoma site: comparative outcomes with conventional laparoscopic and open surgery
    P. Thambi, D. W. Borowski, R. Sathasivam, R.‐B. Obuobi, Y. K. S. Viswanath, T. S. Gill
    Colorectal Disease.2019; 21(7): 833.     CrossRef
  • Clinical effects of warmed humidified carbon dioxide insufflation in infants undergoing major laparoscopic surgery
    Tong Meng-Meng, Xu Xue-Jun, Bao Xiao-Hong
    Medicine.2019; 98(27): e16151.     CrossRef
  • Effect of different carbon dioxide (CO2) insufflation for laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients
    Rongjuan Jiang, Yan Sun, Huaiming Wang, Min Liang, Xianfeng Xie
    Medicine.2019; 98(41): e17520.     CrossRef
The Safety and Efficacy of Mesenteric Embolization in the Management of Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
Ker-Kan Tan, David Hugh Strong, Timothy Shore, Mohammmad Rafei Ahmad, Richard Waugh, Christopher John Young
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(5):205-208.   Published online October 31, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.5.205
  • 5,944 View
  • 42 Download
  • 17 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Mesenteric embolization is an integral part in the management of acute lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding. The aim of this study was to highlight our experience after adopting mesenteric embolization in the management of acute lower GI hemorrhage.

Methods

A retrospective review of all cases of mesenteric embolization for acute lower GI bleeding from October 2007 to August 2012 was performed.

Results

Twenty-seven patients with a median age of 73 years (range, 31 to 86 years) formed the study group. More than half (n = 16, 59.3%) of the patients were on either antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant therapy. The underlying etiology included diverticular disease (n = 9), neoplasms (n = 5) and postprocedural complications (n = 6). The colon was the most common bleeding site and was seen in 21 patients (left, 10; right, 11). The median hemoglobin prior to the embolization was 8.6 g/dL (6.1 to 12.6 g/dL). A 100% technical success rate with immediate cessation of hemorrhage at the end of the session was achieved. There were three clinical failures (11.1%) in our series. Two patients re-bled, and both underwent a successful repeat embolization. The only patient who developed an infarcted bowel following embolization underwent an emergency operation and died one week later. There were no factors that predicted clinical failure.

Conclusion

Mesenteric embolization for acute lower GI bleeding can be safely performed and is associated with a high clinical success rate in most patients. A repeat embolization can be considered in selected cases, but postembolization ischemia is associated with bad outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Imaging and interventions in vascular malformations of the gastrointestinal tract
    Divij Agarwal, Sanchita Gupta, Hemanga K Bhattacharjee, Chandan J Das
    Abdominal Radiology.2025; 50(9): 4023.     CrossRef
  • Twenty years of embolization for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis of rebleeding and ischaemia rates
    Qian Yu, Brian Funaki, Osman Ahmed
    British Journal of Radiology.2024; 97(1157): 920.     CrossRef
  • Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding (Nonvariceal): Concepts and Technique
    Uday Kumar Marri, Jagadeesh R. Singh, Partha Pal, Shreeyash Modak
    Digestive Disease Interventions.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Arteriovenous Malformation of the Jejunum, Causing Massive Gastrointestinal Bleeding, Treated With Intraoperative Enteroscopy Guidance: A Case Report
    Sajan Shrestha, Susan Pradhan, Ajay KC, Sujan Shrestha, Prasan Kansakar
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Management of Synchronous Colorectal Cancer Metastases
    Traci L. Hedrick, Victor M. Zaydfudim
    Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America.2022; 31(2): 265.     CrossRef
  • Management of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding by pharmaco-induced vasospasm embolization therapy
    Ming-Feng Li, Huei-Lung Liang, Chia-Ling Chiang, Yih-Huie Lin
    Journal of the Chinese Medical Association.2022; 85(2): 233.     CrossRef
  • Safety Profile of Particle Embolization for Treatment of Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Bleeding
    Elisabeth Seyferth, Rui Dai, James Ronald, Jonathan G. Martin, Alan A. Sag, Nicholas Befera, Waleska M. Pabon-Ramos, Paul V. Suhocki, Tony P. Smith, Charles Y. Kim
    Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology.2022; 33(3): 286.     CrossRef
  • Superselective transcatheter arterial embolization for acute small bowel bleeding: clinical outcomes and prognostic factors for ischemic complications
    Yong Seek Kim, Joon Ho Kwon, Kichang Han, Man-Deuk Kim, Junhyung Lee, Gyoung Min Kim, Jong Yun Won
    Acta Radiologica.2021; 62(5): 574.     CrossRef
  • Surgical approach for right‐sided colonic diverticular bleeding: A single‐center review of 43 consecutive cases
    Hitoshi Kameyama, Toshiyuki Yamazaki, Akira Iwaya, Hiroaki Uehara, Shiori Utsumi, Motoharu Hirai, Masaru Komatsu, Akira Kubota, Tomohiro Katada, Kazuaki Kobayashi, Daisuke Sato, Naoyuki Yokoyama, Shirou Kuwabara, Tetsuya Otani
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2021; 14(4): 717.     CrossRef
  • The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in emergency colorectal surgery
    Andrew S. Miller, Kathryn Boyce, Benjamin Box, Matthew D. Clarke, Sarah E. Duff, Niamh M. Foley, Richard J. Guy, Lisa H. Massey, George Ramsay, Dominic A. J. Slade, James A. Stephenson, Phil J. Tozer, Danette Wright
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(2): 476.     CrossRef
  • ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Radiologic Management of Lower Gastrointestinal Tract Bleeding: 2021 Update
    Karunakaravel Karuppasamy, Baljendra S. Kapoor, Nicholas Fidelman, Hani Abujudeh, Twyla B. Bartel, Drew M. Caplin, Brooks D. Cash, Steven J. Citron, Khashayar Farsad, Aakash H. Gajjar, Marcelo S. Guimaraes, Amit Gupta, Mikhail Higgins, Daniele Marin, Para
    Journal of the American College of Radiology.2021; 18(5): S139.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and management of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: guidelines from the British Society of Gastroenterology
    Kathryn Oakland, Georgina Chadwick, James E East, Richard Guy, Adam Humphries, Vipul Jairath, Simon McPherson, Magdalena Metzner, A John Morris, Mike F Murphy, Tony Tham, Raman Uberoi, Andrew McCulloch Veitch, James Wheeler, Cuthbert Regan, Jonathan Hoare
    Gut.2019; 68(5): 776.     CrossRef
  • Making decisions using radiology in lower GI hemorrhage
    Assad Zahid, Christopher John Young
    International Journal of Surgery.2016; 31: 100.     CrossRef
  • Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Gastrointestinal Bleeding Secondary to Gastrointestinal Lymphoma
    Lin Zheng, Ji Hoon Shin, Kichang Han, Jiaywei Tsauo, Hyun-Ki Yoon, Gi-Young Ko, Jong-Soo Shin, Kyu-Bo Sung
    CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.2016; 39(11): 1564.     CrossRef
  • Study protocol: first nationwide comparative audit of acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding in the UK
    Kathryn Oakland, Richard Guy, Raman Uberoi, Frances Seeney, Gary Collins, John Grant-Casey, Neil Mortensen, Mike Murphy, Vipul Jairath
    BMJ Open.2016; 6(8): e011752.     CrossRef
  • Diverticular Disease: Changing Epidemiology and Management
    Roshan Razik, Geoffrey C. Nguyen
    Drugs & Aging.2015; 32(5): 349.     CrossRef
  • Mesenteric Embolization: Is It Safe in Patients With Acute Lower Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage?
    Dong Won Lee, Seon Hahn Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(5): 181.     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP