Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
8 "Hyeong Rok Kim"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Malignant disease, Functional outcomes,Colorectal cancer
The Relationship Between High-Output Stomas, Postoperative Ileus, and Readmission After Rectal Cancer Surgery With Diverting Ileostomy
Naa Lee, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Han Deok Kwak, Jae Kyun Ju, Hyeong Rok Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(1):44-50.   Published online September 18, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.08.03
  • 4,157 View
  • 168 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 9 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between high-output stomas (HOSs), postoperative ileus (POI), and readmission after rectal cancer surgery with diverting ileostomy.
Methods
We included 302 patients with rectal cancer who underwent restorative resection with diverting ileostomy between January 2011 and December 2015. HOSs were defined as stomas with ≥ 2,000 mL/day output. We analyzed predictive factors for readmission of these patients.
Results
Forty-eight patients (15.9%) had HOSs during the hospital stay, and 41 patients (13.6%) experienced POI. HOSs were strongly associated with POI (45.8% vs. 7.5%, P < 0.001). The all-cause readmission rate was 16.9%, with 19 (6.3%) and 20 (6.6%) experiencing ileus and acute kidney injury, respectively. HOSs (27.1% vs. 15.0%, P = 0.040) and POI (34.1% vs. 14.2%, P = 0.002) were associated with all-cause readmission, and POI was associated with readmission with ileus (17.1% vs. 4.6%, P = 0.007). POI was an independent risk factor for all-cause readmission (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.640; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.162 to 6.001; P = 0.020) and readmission with ileus (adjusted OR = 3.869; 95% CI 1.387 to 10.792; P = 0.010).
Conclusion
POI was associated with readmission, particularly for subsequent ileus, in patients with diverting ileostomy. We should make efforts to reduce POI, such as strong control of HOSs, to prevent readmission.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • High output stoma after surgery for rectal cancer - a risk factor for low anterior resection syndrome?
    Xuena Zhang, Qingyu Meng, Jianna Du, Zhongtao Tian, Yinju Li, Bin Yu, Wenbo Niu
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Summary of Best Evidence for the Dietary Management in Patients with High-Output Ileostomy
    Ying Wang, Hua Peng, Cui Cui, Qi Zou, Mudi Yang
    Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare.2025; Volume 18: 877.     CrossRef
  • Maximizing Readmission Reduction in Colon Cancer Patients
    Mario Schootman, Chenghui Li, Jun Ying, Sonia T. Orcutt, Jonathan Laryea
    Journal of Surgical Research.2024; 295: 587.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of decision-making factors for defunctioning ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery and their impact on perioperative recovery: a retrospective study of 1082 patients
    Xiaojiang Yi, Huaguo Yang, Hongming Li, Xiaochuang Feng, Weilin Liao, Jiaxin Lin, Zhifeng Chen, Dechang Diao, Manzhao Ouyang
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(11): 6782.     CrossRef
  • Effect of intracorporeal anastomosis on postoperative ileus after laparoscopic right colectomy
    Sangwoo Kim, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek, Young-Gil Son
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 104(3): 156.     CrossRef
  • The Latest Results and Future Directions of Research for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in the Field of Colorectal Surgery
    Min Ki Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Overall readmissions and readmissions related to dehydration after creation of an ileostomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    I. Vogel, M. Shinkwin, S. L. van der Storm, J. Torkington, J. A.Cornish, P. J. Tanis, R. Hompes, W. A. Bemelman
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2022; 26(5): 333.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative paralytic ileus following debulking surgery in ovarian cancer patients
    Eva K. Egger, Freya Merker, Damian J. Ralser, Milka Marinova, Tim O. Vilz, Hanno Matthaei, Tobias Hilbert, Alexander Mustea
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Obstructive and secretory complications of diverting ileostomy
    Shingo Tsujinaka, Hideyuki Suzuki, Tomoya Miura, Yoshihiro Sato, Chikashi Shibata
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 28(47): 6732.     CrossRef
Oncologic Outcomes of Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Stage II and III Upper Rectal Cancer
Ji Eun Yoon, Soo Young Lee, Han Duk Kwak, Seung Seop Yeom, Chang Hyun Kim, Jae Kyun Joo, Hyeong Rok Kim, Young Jin Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(3):137-143.   Published online June 30, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.09.28
  • 4,254 View
  • 106 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The aim of this study was to assess oncological outcomes of postoperative radiotherapy plus chemotherapy (CRT) versus chemotherapy alone (CTx) in stage II or III upper rectal cancer patients who underwent curative surgery.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 263 consecutive patients with pathologic stage II or III upper rectal cancer who underwent primary curative resection with postoperative CRT or CTx from January 2008 to December 2014 at Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital. Multivariate and propensity score matching analyses were used to reduce selection bias.
Results
Median follow-up was 48.1 months for the entire cohort and 53.5 months for the matched cohort. In subgroup analysis of the propensity score matched cohort, the 3-year local recurrence-free survival was 94.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.8%–100%) in the CRT group and 90.1% (95% CI, 82.8%–97.9%) in the CTx group (P = 0.370). No significant difference in disease-free survival was observed according to treatment type. On multivariate analysis, circumferential resection margin involvement (hazard ratio [HR], 2.386; 95% CI, 1.190–7.599; P = 0.032), N stage (HR, 6.262; 95% CI, 1.843–21.278, P = 0.003), and T stage (HR, 5.896, 95% CI, 1.298–6.780, P = 0.021) were identified as independent risk factors for local recurrence of tumors of the upper rectum.
Conclusion
Omission of radiotherapy in an adjuvant treatment setting may not jeopardize oncologic outcomes in stages II and III upper rectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Is radiotherapy necessary for upper rectal cancer underwent curative resection? A retrospective study of 363 patients
    Zhiwei Ma, Jumei Zhou, Ke Liu, Sisi Chen, Qinghui Wu, Lin Peng, Wei Zhao, Suyu Zhu
    Radiation Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Rectal Cancer 2023 Supplement
    Sean J. Langenfeld, Bradley R. Davis, Jon D. Vogel, Jennifer S. Davids, Larissa K.F. Temple, Kyle G. Cologne, Samantha Hendren, Steven Hunt, Julio Garcia Aguilar, Daniel L. Feingold, Amy L. Lightner, Ian M. Paquette
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Which Definition of Upper Rectal Cancer Is Optimal in Selecting Stage II or III Rectal Cancer Patients to Avoid Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation?
    Xian Hua Gao, Bai Zhi Zhai, Juan Li, Jean Luc Tshibangu Kabemba, Hai Feng Gong, Chen Guang Bai, Ming Lu Liu, Shao Ting Zhang, Fu Shen, Lian Jie Liu, Wei Zhang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Role of adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis
    Xin-qi Shi, Jing-yu Zhang, Hua Tian, Ling-na Tang, Ai-lin Li
    Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B.2020; 21(7): 549.     CrossRef
Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer With Persistent Circumferential Resection Margin Invasion After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
Chang Hyun Kim, Seung-Seop Yeom, Hand-Duk Kwak, Soo Young Lee, Jae Kyun Ju, Young Jin Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(2):72-82.   Published online April 30, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.04.22
  • 4,951 View
  • 114 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 14 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Treatment after failure of circumferential resection margin (CRM) conversion after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (pCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) has not been evaluated well. We conducted a single‐center, retrospective analysis to fill this information gap.
Methods
From 2008 to 2016, we included 112 patients who had predictive CRM involvement on baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and who underwent surgery following pCRT for LARC. Baseline and posttreatment radiologic and clinical factors were analyzed.
Results
Of 493 patients with LARC, 112 had CRM involvement by baseline MRI (mrCRM). In 40 patients (35.7%), mrCRM involvement was converted as negative posttreatment CRM (ymrCRM−). Multivariate analysis showed the risk factors for persistent CRM involvement (ymrCRM+) after pCRT were extramural venous invasion (mrEMVI+) (P = 0.030) and lower tumor location (P = 0.007). In addition, persistent CRM involvement after pCRT was an independent risk factor for predicting pathologic CRM involvement. The Cox proportional hazard model showed baseline positive mrEMVI remained significant for disease-free survival (DFS) (P < 0.001). On posttreatment MRI, abdominoperineal resection (P = 0.031), intersphincteric resection (P = 0.006), and persistent CRM involvement (P = 0.001) remained significant for local recurrence-free survival. With regard to DFS, persistent CRM involvement (P = 0.048) and positive EMVI on posttreatment MRI (ymrEMVI) (P = 0.014) were significant. In the patient subgroup with persistent CRM involvement, 5-year DFS in patients with mrEMVI and ymrEMVI was 29.8% and 21.2%, respectively.
Conclusion
Patients who fail to convert to negative CRM have extremely poor oncologic outcomes. Lower tumor height and negative mrEMVI status were good responders to ymrCRM conversion. Our results suggest that these patients require a more intensive treatment modality.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Post‐diagnosis adiposity and colorectal cancer prognosis: A Global Cancer Update Programme (CUP Global) systematic literature review and meta‐analysis
    Nerea Becerra‐Tomás, Georgios Markozannes, Margarita Cariolou, Katia Balducci, Rita Vieira, Sonia Kiss, Dagfinn Aune, Darren C. Greenwood, Laure Dossus, Ellen Copson, Andrew G. Renehan, Martijn Bours, Wendy Demark‐Wahnefried, Melissa M. Hudson, Anne M. Ma
    International Journal of Cancer.2024; 155(3): 400.     CrossRef
  • A Review of Neoadjuvant Therapy and the Watch-and-Wait Protocol in Rectal Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions
    Iulian M Slavu, Octavian Munteanu, Florin Filipoiu, Raluca Tulin, Anca Monica Macovei Oprescu , Ileana Dima, Iulian A Dogaru, Adrian Tulin
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Predictive Model to Evaluate Pathologic Complete Response in Rectal Adenocarcinoma
    Shuiwang Qing, Lei Gu, Tingting Du, Xiaolan Yin, Ke-jia Zhang, Huo-jun Zhang
    Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Oncologic Outcomes Associated With MRI-detected Extramural Venous Invasion (mrEMVI) in Rectal Cancer
    François Rouleau Fournier, Mohammad Ali K. Motamedi, Carl J. Brown, Terry Phang, Manoj J. Raval, Cameron J. Hague, Ahmer A. Karimuddin
    Annals of Surgery.2022; 275(2): 303.     CrossRef
  • Watch and wait strategies for rectal cancer: A systematic review
    In Ja Park
    Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(2): 91.     CrossRef
  • Are oncological long-term outcomes equal after laproscopic completed and converted laparoscopic converted rectal resection for cancer?
    M. Finochi, B. Menahem, G. Lebreton, J. Lubrano, Y. Eid, A. Alves
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2021; 25(1): 91.     CrossRef
  • Sphincter‐saving surgery for ultra‐low rectal carcinoma initially indicated for abdominoperineal resection: Is it safe on a long‐term follow‐up?
    Philippe Rouanet, Michel Rivoire, Sophie Gourgou, Bernard Lelong, Eric Rullier, Merhdad Jafari, Laurent Mineur, Marc Pocard, Jean Luc Faucheron, François Dravet, Denis Pezet, Jean Michel Fabre, Laurent Bresler, Jacques Balosso, Christophe Taoum, Claire Le
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021; 123(1): 299.     CrossRef
  • The prognostic value of MRI-detected extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) for rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy: a meta-analysis
    Silin Chen, Ning Li, Yuan Tang, Jinming Shi, Ying Zhao, Huiying Ma, Shulian Wang, Ye-xiong Li, Jing Jin
    European Radiology.2021; 31(12): 8827.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of Positive Circumferential Resection Margin in Rectal Cancer: A Current Audit of the National Cancer Database
    Hillary L. Simon, Thais Reif de Paula, Magda M. Profeta da Luz, Ravi P. Kiran, Deborah S. Keller
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2021; 64(9): 1096.     CrossRef
  • MRI-detected extramural venous invasion of rectal cancer: Multimodality performance and implications at baseline imaging and after neoadjuvant therapy
    Akitoshi Inoue, Shannon P. Sheedy, Jay P. Heiken, Payam Mohammadinejad, Rondell P. Graham, Hee Eun Lee, Scott R. Kelley, Stephanie L. Hansel, David H. Bruining, Jeff L. Fidler, Joel G. Fletcher
    Insights into Imaging.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Technical Controversies and a Systematic Review on the Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes
    Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Seon Hahn Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 351.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Treatment of Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: Updates
    Cristopher Varela, Nam Kyu Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 395.     CrossRef
  • Functional outcomes after sphincter-preserving surgeries for low-lying rectal cancer: A review
    Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Precision and Future Medicine.2021; 5(4): 164.     CrossRef
  • Reconsideration of the Safety of Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery for Cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Min Ki Kim, Jun-Gi Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2019; 35(5): 229.     CrossRef
Video
Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients With Proximal Transverse Colon Cancer With Situs Inversus Totalis: A Case Report
Seung-Seop Yeom, Kyung Hwan Kim, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim, Young Jin Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):322-325.   Published online December 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.05.29.1
  • 7,708 View
  • 98 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Situs inversus is a rare hereditary disorder in which various anomalies have been reported with internal rotation abnormalities. This case involved an 85-year-old woman who had been diagnosed with transverse colon cancer and who underwent reduced-port laparoscopic surgery. All intra-abdominal organs were reversed left to right and right to left. The aberrant midcolic artery was identified during surgery. The total surgery time was 170 minutes, and the patient lost 20 mL of blood. The patient was discharged on the 8th postoperative day without complications.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration to treat choledocholithiasis in situs inversus patients: A technical review
    Bo-Ya Chiu, Shu-Hung Chuang, Shih-Chang Chuang, Kung-Kai Kuo
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2023; 11(9): 1939.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic radical resection for situs inversus totalis with colonic splenic flexure carcinoma: A case report
    Zi-Ling Zheng, Shou-Ru Zhang, Hao Sun, Mao-Cai Tang, Jing-Kun Shang
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(16): 5435.     CrossRef
  • MicroRNA-129-3p Inhibits Colorectal Cancer Proliferation
    Lei Kang, Dongmei Guo, Yanhai Dong, Xiaowei Chen, Chao Yuan
    Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engineering.2022; 12(12): 2413.     CrossRef
  • Technique for Improving the Adoption of Minimally Invasive Surgery in Challenging Cases
    Giorgio Bogani, Francesco Raspagliesi
    Journal of Investigative Surgery.2021; 34(3): 334.     CrossRef
Editorials
Complete Mesocolic Excision With Central Vascular Ligation for the Treatment of Patients With Colon Cancer
Hyeong-Rok Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(4):165-166.   Published online August 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.05.23
  • 4,721 View
  • 138 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Impact of imaging magnification on colorectal surgery: a matched analysis of a single tertiary center
    F. Puccetti, L. Cinelli, M. Molteni, L. Gozzini, U. Casiraghi, L. A. Barbieri, E. Treppiedi, A. Cossu, R. Rosati, U. Elmore
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(11): 1057.     CrossRef
  • Extended Lymphadenectomy for Proximal Transverse Colon Cancer: Is There a Place for Standardization?
    Răzvan Cătălin Popescu, Florin Botea, Eugen Dumitru, Laura Mazilu, Luminița Gențiana Micu, Cristina Tocia, Andrei Dumitru, Adina Croitoru, Nicoleta Leopa
    Medicina.2022; 58(5): 596.     CrossRef
Obesity-Related Colorectal Cancer: The Role of Leptin
Hyeong Rok Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(6):209-210.   Published online December 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.6.209
  • 3,684 View
  • 37 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Leptin: A Heavyweight Player in Obesity-Related Cancers
    Amanda Caruso, Luca Gelsomino, Salvatore Panza, Felice Maria Accattatis, Giuseppina Daniela Naimo, Ines Barone, Cinzia Giordano, Stefania Catalano, Sebastiano Andò
    Biomolecules.2023; 13(7): 1084.     CrossRef
  • Leptin, Both Bad and Good Actor in Cancer
    Carlos Jiménez-Cortegana, Ana López-Saavedra, Flora Sánchez-Jiménez, Antonio Pérez-Pérez, Jesús Castiñeiras, Juan A. Virizuela-Echaburu, Luis de la de la Cruz-Merino, Víctor Sánchez-Margalet
    Biomolecules.2021; 11(6): 913.     CrossRef
  • Exploring the Inflammatory Pathogenesis of Colorectal Cancer
    Ahamed A Khalyfa, Shil Punatar, Rida Aslam, Alex Yarbrough
    Diseases.2021; 9(4): 79.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Clinical Significance of Serial Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Values for Treating Rectal Cancer with Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
Young Jae Ryu, Chang Hyun Kim, Hun Jin Kim, Hyo Kang, Sang Woo Lim, Jung Wook Huh, Jae Kyun Ju, Young Jin Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(4):205-212.   Published online August 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.4.205
  • 3,820 View
  • 43 Download
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Preoperative chemoradiotherapy is now widely accepted to treat rectal cancer; however, the prognosis for rectal cancer patients during and after chemoradiotherapy must be determined. The aim of this study was to evaluate the serial serum carcinoembryonic antigen (s-CEA) samples in patients with rectal cancer who underwent radical surgery after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

Methods

This study evaluated 236 patients with rectal cancer who received preoperative CRT followed by curative surgery between June 2005 and June 2010. We measured the patient's s-CEA levels pre-CRT, post-CRT and post-surgery. Patients were classified into four groups according to their s-CEA concentrations (group 1, high, high, high; group 2, high, high, normal; group 3, high, normal, normal; group 4, normal, normal, normal). We analyzed the clinicopathologic factors and the outcomes among these groups.

Results

Of the 236 patients, 12 were in group 1, 31 were in group 2, 67 were in group 3, and 126 were in group 4. The 3-year disease-free survival rate in group 1 was poorer than those in group 3 (P = 0.007) and group 4 (P < 0.001). In a univariate analysis, type of surgery, clinical N stage, pathologic T or N stage, lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and CEA group were prognostic factors. A multivariate analysis revealed that type of surgery, pathologic T stage, and lymphovascular invasion were independent prognostic factors; however, no statistical significance was associated with the CEA group.

Conclusion

High pre-CRT, post-CRT, and post-surgery s-CEA levels in patients with rectal cancer were associated with high rates of systemic recurrence and poor survival. Therefore, patients with sustained high s-CEA levels during CRT require careful monitoring after surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Accessing new prognostic significance of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer receiving tumor resection: More than positive and negative
    Zerong Cai, Jian Xiao, Xiaosheng He, Jia Ke, Yifeng Zou, Yufeng Chen, Xianrui Wu, Xiaoling Li, Lei Wang, Jianping Wang, Ping Lan, Xiaojian Wu
    Cancer Biomarkers.2017; 19(2): 161.     CrossRef
  • Prognosis Can Be Predicted More Accurately Using Pre- and Postchemoradiotherapy Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels Compared to Only Prechemoradiotherapy Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients Who Received Neoadjuvant Chemor
    SooYoon Sung, Seok Hyun Son, Chul Seung Kay, Yoon Suk Lee
    Medicine.2016; 95(10): e2965.     CrossRef
  • New clinical advances in immunotherapy for the treatment of solid tumours
    Valentina A. Zavala, Alexis M. Kalergis
    Immunology.2015; 145(2): 182.     CrossRef
  • Biomarkers and Molecular Imaging as Predictors of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Chiara Molinari, Federica Matteucci, Paola Caroli, Alessandro Passardi
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2015; 14(4): 227.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic factors associated with locally recurrent rectal cancer following primary surgery (Review)
    YANTAO CAI, ZHENYANG LI, XIAODONG GU, YANTIAN FANG, JIANBIN XIANG, ZONGYOU CHEN
    Oncology Letters.2014; 7(1): 10.     CrossRef
  • Factors predicting long-term survival in colorectal cancer patients with a normal preoperative serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen
    Jung Wook Huh, Chang Hyun Kim, Sang Woo Lim, Hyeong Rok Kim, Young Jin Kim
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2013; 139(9): 1449.     CrossRef
Clinical Significance of Tumor Regression Grade in Rectal Cancer with Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
Young Joo Park, Byung Ryul Oh, Sang Woo Lim, Jung Wook Huh, Jae Kyun Joo, Young Jin Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(4):279-286.   Published online August 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.4.279
  • 4,651 View
  • 32 Download
  • 18 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy applied to the locally advanced rectal cancer reduces local recurrence and improves survival. We assessed tumor regression grade (TRG) and its influence on survival in rectal cancer patients treated with chemoradiotherapy followed by surgical resection.

Methods

We studied 108 patients that were seen at our hospital between August 2004 and December 2008. Patients received preoperative chemoradiotherapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin by continous infusion during the first and fifth week, delivered with concurrent pelvic radiation of 50.4 Gy, followed by radical surgery at 6-8 weeks. The TRG was determined by the amount of fibrosis in the tumor embedding area and was divided into 5 grades based on the relative amount of fibrosis. We analyzed all preoperative clinicopathologic factors, postoperative pathologic stages, TRG and prognosis, retrospectively.

Results

Downstaging of rectal cancer through neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy occurred in 64 (59%) patients. The numbers of total regressions (TRG4), good regressions (TRG3), moderate regressions (TRG2), minor regressions (TRG1), and no regression (TRG0) were 19 (18%), 65 (60%), 17 (16%), 6 (5%), and 1 (1%) respectively. The TRG was inversely correlated with perineural invasion and lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.008, P = 0.032). The local recurrence rate declined as the tumor regression grade increased (P = 0.032). The 19 patients with TRG4 had a better three-year disease free survival than the 89 patients with TRG0-3 (P = 0.034). The 16 patients with pathologic complete remission (pCR) had a better three-year disease free survival than the 92 patients with non-pCR (P = 0.025).

Conclusion

Higher TRG after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer closely correlates with better survival and low local recurrence. The TRG is considered to be a significant prognostic factor.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • An investigation into tumor regression grade as a parameter for locally advanced rectal cancer and 5-year overall survival rate
    Supparerk Laohawiriyakamol, Wongsakorn Chaochankit, Worawit Wanichsuwan, Kanet Kanjanapradit, Teeranan Laohawiriyakamol
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(1): 59.     CrossRef
  • Rezultate preliminare ale markerilor ca predictori ai răspunsului tisular la radiochimioterapie în cancerul rectal
    Sânziana Ionescu, Petre Radu, Octavia Luciana Madge, Victor Strâmbu
    Oncolog-Hematolog.ro.2022; 1(58): 8.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Implication of Perineural and Lymphovascular Invasion in Rectal Cancer Patients Who Underwent Surgery After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Young Il Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Jong Hoon Kim, Jihun Kim, Jun-Soo Ro, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2022; 65(11): 1325.     CrossRef
  • Downstaging in Advanced Rectal Cancers: A Propensity-Matched Comparison Between Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Chemotherapy and Long-Course Chemoradiotherapy
    Praveen S. Kammar, Niharika R. Garach, Sivasanker Masillamany, Ashwin de’Souza, Vikas Ostwal, Avanish P. Saklani
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2022; 65(10): 1215.     CrossRef
  • Overexpression of MLPH in Rectal Cancer Patients Correlates with a Poorer Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy and Reduced Patient Survival
    Wan-Shan Li, Chih-I Chen, Hsin-Pao Chen, Kuang-Wen Liu, Chia-Jen Tsai, Ching-Chieh Yang
    Diagnostics.2021; 11(11): 2132.     CrossRef
  • How to measure tumour response in rectal cancer? An explanation of discrepancies and suggestions for improvement
    Iris D. Nagtegaal, Rob Glynne-Jones
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2020; 84: 101964.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy might provide survival benefit in patients with stage IIIb/IIIc locally advanced rectal cancer: A retrospective single‐institution study with propensity score‐matched comparative analysis
    Xi‐yu Sun, Song‐hua Cai, Lai Xu, Dan Luo, Hui‐zhong Qiu, Bin Wu, Guo‐le Lin, Jun‐yang Lu, Guan‐nan Zhang, Yi Xiao
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology.2020; 16(3): 142.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of tumour regression grade in locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
    J. C. Kong, G. R. Guerra, S. K. Warrier, A. Craig Lynch, M. Michael, S. Y. Ngan, W. Phillips, G. Ramsay, A. G. Heriot
    Colorectal Disease.2018; 20(7): 574.     CrossRef
  • UEG Week 2018 Poster Presentations

    United European Gastroenterology Journal.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of tumour regression grade after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for a cohort of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: an 8‐year retrospective single‐institutional study
    L. Xu, S. Cai, T. Xiao, Y. Chen, H. Qiu, B. Wu, G. Lin, X. Sun, J. Lu, W. Zhou, Y. Xiao
    Colorectal Disease.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Magnetic resonance tumor regression grade (MR-TRG) to assess pathological complete response following neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Marco Rengo, Simona Picchia, Simona Marzi, Davide Bellini, Damiano Caruso, Mauro Caterino, Maria Ciolina, Domenico De Santis, Daniela Musio, Vincenzo Tombolini, Andrea Laghi
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(70): 114746.     CrossRef
  • Oncologic impact of pathologic response on clinical outcome after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Wook Hyeon Yoon, Hun Jin Kim, Chang Hyun Kim, Jae Kyoon Joo, Young Jin Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2015; 88(1): 15.     CrossRef
  • Low Lymph Node Retrieval After Preoperative Chemoradiation for Rectal Cancer is Associated with Improved Prognosis in Patients with a Good Tumor Response
    Hun Jin Kim, Jeong Seon Jo, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Young Jin Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2015; 22(6): 2075.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Prediction of Pathological Complete Response After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
    Jung Wook Huh, Hyeong Rok Kim, Young Jin Kim
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2013; 56(6): 698.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Significance of Partial Tumor Regression After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
    Yen-Chien Lee, Chung-Cheng Hsieh, Jen-Pin Chuang
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2013; 56(9): 1093.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Role of p53 Messenger Ribonucleic Acid Expression in Patients after Curative Resection for Stage I to III Colorectal Cancer: Association with Colon Cancer Stem Cell Markers
    Jung Wook Huh, Hyeong Rok Kim, Young Jin Kim
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2013; 216(6): 1063.     CrossRef
  • A phase II study of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with oxaliplatin and capecitabine for rectal cancer
    Lin Zhao, Chunmei Bai, Yajuan Shao, Mei Guan, Ning Jia, Yi Xiao, Huizhong Qiu, Fuquan Zhang, Ti Yang, Guangxi Zhong, Shuchang Chen
    Cancer Letters.2011; 310(2): 134.     CrossRef
  • Oncologic outcomes of pathologic stage I lower rectal cancer with or without preoperative chemoradiotherapy: Are they comparable?
    Jung Wook Huh, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim, Young Jin Kim
    Surgery.2011; 150(5): 980.     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP