Purpose Accurate preoperative staging of colon cancer is essential for providing the optimal treatment strategy and evaluating the expected prognosis. The aim of this study is to assess the value of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) over conventional studies in the staging of colon cancer.
Methods A total of 266 colon cancer patients diagnosed between January 2008 and December 2010 were assessed with both PET/CT and conventional studies. Discordance with PET/CT and conventional studies were evaluated, and changes in the management strategy were assessed for each stage. Discordant findings were verified by using intraoperative examination, pathology reports, and follow-up imaging studies.
Results Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and PET/CT showed similar accuracy in detecting lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical stage III (36.2% vs. 42%, P = 0.822) and stage IV (60.3% vs. 63.5%, P = 0.509) disease. PET/CT led to a change in management strategy for 1 of 40 patients (2.5%) with clinical stage I, 0 of 25 patients (0%) with stage II, 9 of 138 patients (6.5%) with stage III, and 8 of 63 patients (12.7%) with stage IV disease.
Conclusion PET/CT changed the management plan in 6.5% of patients with clinical stage III and 12.7% of patients with clinical stage IV colon cancer. Our findings suggest that PET/CT may be considered as a routine staging tool for clinical stage III and IV colon cancers.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Diagnostic role of F-18 FDG PET/CT in determining preoperative Lymph node status of patients with rectal cancer: a meta-analysis Weili Ma, Bo Chen, Fandong Zhu, Chen Yang, Jianfeng Yang Abdominal Radiology.2024; 49(6): 2125. CrossRef
Colon cancer: the 2023 Korean clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis and treatment Hyo Seon Ryu, Hyun Jung Kim, Woong Bae Ji, Byung Chang Kim, Ji Hun Kim, Sung Kyung Moon, Sung Il Kang, Han Deok Kwak, Eun Sun Kim, Chang Hyun Kim, Tae Hyung Kim, Gyoung Tae Noh, Byung-Soo Park, Hyeung-Min Park, Jeong Mo Bae, Jung Hoon Bae, Ni Eun Seo, Cha Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(2): 89. CrossRef
Accuracy of pre‐operative 18‐fluoride fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG‐PET) in predicting lymph node involvement in colon cancer Chahaya Marc Gauci, Tae Jun Kim, Yijun Gao, Dayashan S. Perera ANZ Journal of Surgery.2023; 93(11): 2675. CrossRef
Contribution of Metabolic Parameters and Pericolic Fat Stranding on Preoperative 18F-FDG PET/CT in Predicting Post-operative Histopathology and Outcome in Colorectal Cancer Selin Soyluoglu, Busra Ozdemir Gunay Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.2023; 57(5): 223. CrossRef
CT is unreliable in locoregional staging of early colon cancer: A nationwide registry-based study Erik Wetterholm, Roberto Rosén, Milladur Rahman, Carl-Fredrik Rönnow Scandinavian Journal of Surgery.2023; 112(1): 33. CrossRef
Diagnostic accuracy of ≥ 16-slice spiral computed tomography for local staging of colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis Dan Liu, Lin-Mei Sun, Jing-Hua Liang, Lei Song, Xiao-Pei Liu World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(19): 6483. CrossRef
Clinical application and research advancement of positron emission tomography/computed tomography in colorectal cancer Wu Cai-Xia, Wang Rong-Fu World Chinese Journal of Digestology.2020; 28(18): 925. CrossRef
Is It Time to Introduce PET/CT in Colon Cancer Guidelines? Anna Margherita Maffione, Domenico Rubello, Paola Caroli, Patrick M. Colletti, Federica Matteucci Clinical Nuclear Medicine.2020; 45(7): 525. CrossRef
The role of PET/CT with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in detecting the progression of colorectal cancer in asymptomatic patients with elevated level of сarcinoembryonic antigen (literature review) M. B. Dolgushin, A. I. Mikhaylov, S. S. Gordeev Surgery and Oncology.2019; 9(2): 11. CrossRef
Morphological predictors for lymph node metastases on computed tomography in colon cancer Erik Rollvén, Lennart Blomqvist, Emma Öistämö, Fredrik Hjern, György Csanaky, Mirna Abraham-Nordling Abdominal Radiology.2019; 44(5): 1712. CrossRef
Colorectal Cancer: Nathan C. Hall, Alexander T. Ruutiainen Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America.2018; 27(2): 289. CrossRef
Assessment and diagnostic accuracy of lymph node status to predict stage III colon cancer using computed tomography Erik Rollvén, Mirna Abraham-Nordling, Torbjörn Holm, Lennart Blomqvist Cancer Imaging.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Diagnostic Accuracy of CT for Local Staging of Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Elias Nerad, Max J. Lahaye, Monique Maas, Patty Nelemans, Frans C. H. Bakers, Geerard L. Beets, Regina G. H. Beets-Tan American Journal of Roentgenology.2016; 207(5): 984. CrossRef
Comparison of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT findings with vascular endothelial growth factors and receptors in colorectal cancer Ahmet Kocael, Betül Vatankulu, Osman Şimşek, Mahir Cengiz, Ahu Kemik, Pınar Kocael, Metin Halaç, Kerim Sönmezoğlu, Kenan Ulualp Tumor Biology.2016; 37(3): 3871. CrossRef
Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis in PET/CT Correlate With the Pathological Findings of Colorectal Cancer and Allow Its Accurate Staging Yoshiyuki Suzuki, Koji Okabayashi, Hirotoshi Hasegawa, Masashi Tsuruta, Kohei Shigeta, Koji Murakami, Yuko Kitagawa Clinical Nuclear Medicine.2016; 41(10): 761. CrossRef
Impact of Fluorodeoxyglucose PET/Computed Tomography on the Management of Patients with Colorectal Cancer Sander Thomas Laurens, Wim J.G. Oyen PET Clinics.2015; 10(3): 345. CrossRef
The Role of Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in the Initial Staging of Colon Cancer Hyung Jin Kim, Seong Taek Oh Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(1): 3. CrossRef
Preoperative Staging With Positron Emission Tomography in Patients With Colorectal Cancer Young Wan Kim, Ik Yong Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(6): 247. CrossRef