Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Ji Hoon Kim"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Minimally invasive surgery
New double-stapling technique without staple-crossing line in laparoscopic low anterior resection: effort to reduce anastomotic leakage
Nam Seok Kim, Ji Hoon Kim, Yoon Suk Lee, In Kyu Lee, Won Kyung Kang
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(6):573-579.   Published online November 22, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00409.0058
  • 754 View
  • 67 Download
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study aimed to demonstrate the safety of new double-stapling technique (nDST), without a crossing line and dog ears, by comparing with conventional DST (cDST) in laparoscopic low anterior resection (LAR).
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 98 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic LAR for rectal cancer from January 2018 to December 2020. The inclusion criterion was an anastomosis level below the peritoneal reflection and 4 cm above the anal verge. In the nDST group, the staple line of the linear cutter was sutured using barbed sutures to shorten the staple line before firing the circular stapler. Therefore, there were no crossing lines after firing the circular stapler. A 2:1 propensity score matching was performed between the cDST and nDST groups.
Results
After propensity score matching, 39 patients were in the cDST group and 20 were in the nDST group. There were no significant differences in patient demographics between the 2 groups. There was no difference in the total operation time between the cDST and nDST groups (124.0±26.2 minutes vs. 125.2±20.3 minutes, P=0.853). Morbidity rates were similar between the 2 groups (9 cases [23.1%] vs. 5 cases [25.0%], P=0.855). There was no significant difference in leakage rate (4 cases [10.3%] vs. 1 case [5.0%], P=0.847) and anastomotic bleeding rate (1 case [2.6%] vs. 3 cases [15.0%], P=0.211).
Conclusion
The nDST to eliminate the crossing line and dog ears in laparoscopic LAR is technically feasible and safe. However, more attention should be paid to anastomotic bleeding in such cases.
Impact of Patient’s Pain and Fatigue on Decision of Discharge After Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
Gyeora Lee, Jun-Suh Lee, Ji Hoon Kim, Duk Yeon Hwang, Yoon-Suk Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(4):209-215.   Published online August 31, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.11.29
  • 3,992 View
  • 118 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Hospital stays after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer tend to be much shorter than those after conventional open surgery. Many factors, including surgical outcomes and complications, are associated with patient discharge planning. However, few studies have analyzed the impact of patient subjective discomfort (including pain and fatigue) on the decision to discharge after surgery. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine how patient pain and fatigue play a role in the decision to discharge after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.
Methods
Between March 2014 and February 2015, we conducted a questionnaire survey of 91 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer to estimate the expectation criteria for discharge and patient subjective discomfort at that time. Patients were divided into the following 2 groups: group A, those who complied with the medical professional’s decision to discharge; and group B, those who refused discharge despite the medical professional’s decision. The participants’ subjective factors were analyzed.
Results
Preoperatively, 78 of 91 patients (85.7%) identified activity level, amount of food (tolerance), and bowel movements as important factors that should be considered in the decision to discharge a patient postoperatively. Postoperatively, 17 patients (18.7%) refused discharge despite a discharge recommendation. Subjective pain and fatigue were significantly different in linear-by-linear association between the group of patients who agreed to be discharge and those who disagreed. Despite this difference, there was no significant difference in mean length of hospital stay between the 2 groups.
Conclusion
A patient’s subjective feelings of pain and fatigue can impact their decision regarding hospital discharge.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effect of continuous wound infiltration on patients using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain management after reduced-port laparoscopic colorectal surgery
    Hyeon Deok Choi, Sung Uk Bae
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 564.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol in a High-Risk Population Undergoing Colon Cancer Surgery
    Denise L. Wong, Alexis Holland, Mehmet Kocak, Mace Coday, Caroline Brown, Justin J. Monroe, Nathan M. Hinkle, Jeremiah L. Deneve, Evan S. Glazer, David Shibata
    The American Surgeon™.2023; 89(11): 4485.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of Aromatherapy on Ameliorating Fatigue in Adults: A Meta-Analysis
    Qiuting Wang, Lin Wei, Yueming Luo, Lijun Lin, Chong Deng, Ping Hu, Lijia Zhu, Yangchen Liu, Meizhen Lin, Azizah Ugusman
    Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Reducing hospital stay for colorectal surgery in ERAS setting by means of perioperative patient education of expected day of discharge
    Thaís T. T. Tweed, Carmen Woortman, Stan Tummers, Maikel J. A. M. Bakens, James van Bastelaar, Jan H. M. B. Stoot
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(7): 1535.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Patient’s Pain and Fatigue on the Discharge Decision After Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
    Won Beom Jung
    Annals of Coloproctology.2019; 35(4): 158.     CrossRef
Effect of Gum Chewing on the Recovery From Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Duk Yeon Hwang, Ho Young Kim, Ji Hoon Kim, In Gyu Lee, Jun Ki Kim, Seung Taek Oh, Yoon Suk Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(6):248-251.   Published online December 31, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.6.248
  • 3,760 View
  • 38 Download
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

We aimed to examine the effect of gum chewing after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery.

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery in Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea School of Medicine. We divided the patients into 2 groups: group A consisted of 67 patients who did not chew gum; group B consisted of 65 patients who chewed gum. We analyzed the short-term clinical outcomes between the two groups to evaluate the effect of gum chewing.

Results

The first passage of gas was slightly earlier in group B, but the difference was not significant. However, the length of hospital stay was 6.7 days in group B, which was significantly shorter than that in group A (7.3 days, P = 0.018).

Conclusion

This study showed that length of postoperative hospital stay was shorter in the gum-chewing group. In future studies, we expect to elucidate the effect of gum chewing on the postoperative recovery more clearly.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Postoperative Ileus and Nonpharmacological Nursing Interventions for Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Hande Nur Arslan, Sevilay Şenol Çelik, Gamze Bozkul
    Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • https://medcraveonline.com/IJCAM/IJCAM-14-00535.pdf
    Nahima Miah, Sanjay Noonan, Emma Copeland, Eastern Road, Elaine Macaninch
    International Journal of Complementary & Alternative Medicine.2021; 14(2): 69.     CrossRef
  • Chewing Gum for Intestinal Function Recovery after Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Binbin Mei, Wenting Wang, Feifei Cui, Zunjia Wen, Meifen Shen
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2017; 2017: 1.     CrossRef
  • Chewing gum for postoperative recovery of gastrointestinal function
    Vaneesha Short, Georgia Herbert, Rachel Perry, Charlotte Atkinson, Andrew R Ness, Christopher Penfold, Steven Thomas, Henning Keinke Andersen, Stephen J Lewis
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sham Feeding? Same Feeding?
    Hungdai Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(6): 224.     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP