Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Original Articles

Comparative study of robot-assisted surgery for right-sided colon cancer: a propensity score–matched analysis of the hinotori Surgical Robot System and the da Vinci Surgical System: Koji Morohara, Hidetoshi Katsuno, Tomoyoshi Endo, Kenichi Nakamura, Kazuhiro Matsuo, Kazuki Tsujimura, Tetsuya Koide, Takashi Imanaka, Tomohiro Kubo, Satoshi Arakawa, Tsunekazu Hanai, Zenichi Morise; Received September 25, 2025 Accepted November 13, 2025 Published online April 15, 2026; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.01151.0164 [Epub ahead of print]

87 View
4 Download

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: Purpose
The da Vinci Surgical System has led to major advances in robot-assisted colorectal surgery. Following its patent expiration, domestic alternatives such as the hinotori Surgical Robot System have been developed in Japan. However, clinical comparisons between the hinotori and the da Vinci Xi systems remain limited. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of right-sided colon cancer surgeries performed with either system using propensity score matching.
Methods
This retrospective study included 39 patients who underwent da Vinci–assisted surgery and 37 who underwent surgery using the hinotori system. Propensity score matching was performed using 7 covariates: age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, clinical T and N categories, and surgeon experience (≥100 prior robotic colorectal surgeries). To assess the robustness of the findings, inverse probability weighting was also applied using the same covariates. Surgical, postoperative, and pathological outcomes were evaluated.
Results
After matching, 27 patients were included in each group. The hinotori group had significantly longer operative and console times (236 minutes vs. 191 minutes, P=0.001; 140 minutes vs. 90 minutes, P<0.001). No significant differences were observed in blood loss, complication rates, length of hospital stay, or lymph node harvest. No conversions or reoperations occurred. One readmission for ileus was noted in the da Vinci group, whereas none occurred in the hinotori group.
Conclusion
Right colectomy assisted by the hinotori system demonstrated short-term outcomes equivalent to those of the da Vinci system, despite a prolonged operative time. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are warranted.

Minimally invasive surgery

Propensity score–matched comparison of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery using hinotori and da Vinci: Hidetoshi Katsuno, Koji Morohara, Tomoyoshi Endo, Kenji Kikuchi, Kenichi Nakamura, Kazuhiro Matsuo, Takahiko Higashiguchi, Tetsuya Koide, Hiromi Kanai, Satoshi Arakawa, Tsunekazu Hanai, Zenichi Morise; Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(4):310-318. Published online August 25, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00136.0019

3,667 View
65 Download
4 Web of Science
4 Citations

Graphical Abstract Abstract PDF

Purpose
The hinotori Surgical Robot System (hereafter “hinotori”) is a novel platform for robot-assisted surgery, while the da Vinci Surgical System (“da Vinci”) remains the field standard. This study compared short-term surgical outcomes of rectal cancer surgery between these systems using propensity score–matched analysis.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted of 209 consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery with the da Vinci and 58 patients with the hinotori system. After 2:1 propensity score matching, 108 da Vinci and 54 hinotori cases were included. Surgical outcomes, including operative time, blood loss, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and pathological findings, were compared.
Results
After matching, the baseline demographics were well balanced between groups. The hinotori system was associated with significantly longer operative time (266 minutes vs. 227 minutes, P=0.014) and console time (156 minutes vs. 110 minutes, P=0.001). However, estimated blood loss and postoperative complication rate did not differ significantly. Pathological findings, including the number of lymph nodes retrieved and the incidence of positive surgical margins, were comparable between systems.
Conclusion
In rectal surgery, the hinotori system demonstrates comparable short-term safety outcomes to da Vinci. Despite longer operative times and limited integrated instrumentation, hinotori‐assisted procedures may be feasible in selected patients. Further research should address long-term oncological outcomes and strategies to improve procedural efficiency.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Learning curve for robot-assisted rectal resection using the hinotori™ surgical robot system: a risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis in a surgical team without prior robotic surgery experience
Akiyoshi Ikebata, Koji Okabayashi, Kohei Shigeta, Hiroyuki Hazama, Masayo Ogiri, Jae-Hoon Yoo, Yumi Egashira, Ryusuke Amemiya, Shinichi Tsuwano, Shigeo Hayatsu
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Beyond multiport DaVinci®: a closer look at less commonly used robotic systems in resectional colorectal surgery
Rahul Bhome, Subash P Vasudevan
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Early Clinical Experience With the Hinotori Robotic Surgical System: Comparable Perioperative Outcomes With the da Vinci Platform in Primary Lung Cancer
Yasuaki Kubouchi, Ryota Yasuda, Yuji Nozaka, Wakako Fujiwara, Shinji Matsui, Yugo Tanaka
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Racing toward the future of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: a comparative study of hinotori and da Vinci
Sung Uk Bae
Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(4): 259. CrossRef

Technical Note

Minimally invasive surgery

Short-term surgical outcomes of robot-assisted colectomy for colon cancer using the hinotori Surgical Robot System: Koji Morohara, Hidetoshi Katsuno, Tomoyoshi Endo, Kenji Kikuchi, Kenichi Nakamura, Kazuhiro Matsuo, Takahiko Higashiguchi, Tetsuya Koide, Tsunekazu Hanai, Zenichi Morise; Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(1):97-103. Published online February 28, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00871.0124

5,928 View
150 Download

PDF Supplementary Material

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search