Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Original Articles

Benign GI diease

Surgical Management of Sigmoid Volvulus: A Multicenter Observational Study: Keunchul Lee, Heung-Kwon Oh, Jung Rae Cho, Minhyun Kim, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang, Hyung-Jin Kim, Hyoung-Chul Park, Rumi Shin, Seung Chul Heo, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Kyu Joo Park, Seoul Colorectal Research Group (SECOG); Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(6):403-408. Published online December 31, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.03.23

10,473 View
188 Download
17 Web of Science
14 Citations

Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate real-world clinical outcomes from surgically treated patients for sigmoid volvulus.
Methods
Five tertiary centers participated in this retrospective study with data collected from October 2003 through September 2018, including demographic information, preoperative clinical data, and information on laparoscopic/open and elective/emergency procedures. Outcome measurements included operation time, postoperative hospitalization, and postoperative morbidity.
Results
Among 74 patients, sigmoidectomy was the most common procedure (n = 46), followed by Hartmann’s procedure (n = 23), and subtotal colectomy (n = 5). Emergency surgery was performed in 35 cases (47.3%). Of the 35 emergency patients, 34 cases (97.1%) underwent open surgery, and a stoma was established for 26 patients (74.3%). Elective surgery was performed in 39 cases (52.7%), including 21 open procedures (53.8%), and 18 laparoscopic surgeries (46.2%). Median laparoscopic operation time was 180 minutes, while median open surgery time was 130 minutes (P < 0.001). Median postoperative hospitalization was 11 days for laparoscopy and 12 days for open surgery. There were 20 postoperative complications (27.0%), and all were resolved with conservative management. Emergency surgery cases had a higher complication rate than elective surgery cases (40.0% vs. 15.4%, P = 0.034).
Conclusion
Relative to elective surgery, emergency surgery had a higher rate of postoperative complications, open surgery, and stoma formation. As such, elective laparoscopic surgery after successful sigmoidoscopic decompression may be the optimal clinical option.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Mesopexy instead of colectomy successfully treated an elderly patient with sigmoid volvulus, a case report
Jin Qian, Shu-Qing Hua
Asian Journal of Surgery.2025; 48(2): 1441. CrossRef
Outcomes for sigmoid volvulus managed with and without early definitive surgery: 20‐year experience in a tertiary referral centre
Shriranshini Satheakeerthy, Priscilla Leow, Benjamin Hall, Damien Ah Yen, Jesse Fischer
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2024; 94(1-2): 169. CrossRef
Patience is key: Association of surgical timing with clinical outcomes in elderly patients with sigmoid volvulus
Suzanne C. Arnold, Wardah Rafaqat, May Abiad, Emanuele Lagazzi, Anne H. Hoekman, Vahe S. Panossian, Ikemsinachi C. Nzenwa, Charudutt N. Paranjape, George C. Velmahos, Haytham M.A. Kaafarani, John O. Hwabejire
The American Journal of Surgery.2024; 232: 81. CrossRef
Epidemiology and age-related trends in surgical outcomes for sigmoid volvulus: a 17-year analysis
Lukas Schabl, Stefan D. Holubar, Kamil Erozkan, Ali Alipouriani, Himani Sancheti, Scott R. Steele, Hermann Kessler
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Unveiling a Coalescing Catastrophe: Pre-pyloric Perforation Co-existing With Sigmoid Volvulus in a Middle-Aged Patient
Mihir Patil, Pankaj Gharde
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Navigating Abdominal Volvulus: A Comprehensive Review of Management Strategies
Simran Chauhan, Raju K Shinde, Yashraj Jain
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Laparoscopic redo surgery for sigmoid volvulus following laparoscopic sigmoidectomy
Hideyuki Masui, Kenji Kawada, Susumu Inamoto, Toshiaki Wada, Yoshiharu Sakai, Kazutaka Obama
Surgical Case Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Sigmoid volvulus as a rare cause of intestinal obstruction in the pediatric population: case series and literature review
Isabel C. Brito Rojas, Mayra A. Hernández Peñuela, Vanessa Medina Gaviria, Martin La Rotta, John M. Escobar Echeverri
International Journal of Surgery Open.2024; 62(2): 149. CrossRef
Metachronous volvulus of the descending colon after resection of the sigmoid volvulus; a case report
Molla Asnake Kebede, Sisay Mengistu Mohammed, Yilkal Teshome Numaro, Yohanes Yoseph Mesfine, Adugnaw Bogale Worku, Anteneh Messele Birhanu
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2024; 123: 110212. CrossRef
Left iliac fossa sigmoidectomy with mechanical anastomosis in the management of uncomplicated sigmoid volvulus: an observational study at Principal Hospital of Dakar, Senegal
Eugene Gaudens Prosper Amaye Dieme, Birame Ndiaye, Magatte Faye, Samba Tiapato Faye, Moustapha Diop, Madawas Mboup, Ibrahima Sall, Oumar Fall, Alamasso Sow
The Pan African Medical Journal.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Bowel Preparation Before Nonelective Sigmoidectomy for Sigmoid Volvulus: Highly Beneficial but Vastly Underused
Natalie Schudrowitz, C Patrick Shahan, Tovah Moss, John E Scarborough
Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2023; 236(4): 649. CrossRef
Perioperative Adverse Outcome and Its Predictors After Emergency Laparotomy Among Sigmoid Volvulus Patients: Retrospective Follow-Up Study
Tilahun Deresse, Esubalew Tesfahun, Zenebe Gebreegziabher, Mandante Bogale, Dawit Alemayehu, Megbar Dessalegn, Tewodros Kifleyohans, George Eskandar
Open Access Emergency Medicine.2023; Volume 15: 383. CrossRef
Colonic pseudo-obstruction in a patient with dyssynergic defecation: A case report
Yejun Jeong, Yongjae Kim, Wonhyun Kim, Seoyeon Park, Su-Jin Shin, Eun Jung Park
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2022; 98: 107524. CrossRef
Comments on “Surgical Management of Sigmoid Volvulus: A Multicenter Observational Study”
Sabri Selcuk Atamanalp
Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(2): 73. CrossRef

Transmissibility of the Campaign for Colorectal Cancer Awareness in Korea Among Twitter Users: Keun Chul Lee, Heung-Kwon Oh, Gibeom Park, SoHyun Park, Bongwon Suh, Woo Kyung Bae, Jin Won Kim, Hyuk Yoon, Myung Jo Kim, Sung-Il Kang, Il Tae Son, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang; Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(5):184-189. Published online October 31, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.5.184

7,070 View
52 Download
13 Web of Science
13 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

The Korean Society of Coloproctology holds its annual colorectal awareness month every September. This study analyzed the users and the contents of Korean tweets regarding colorectal cancer and estimated the transmissibility of the awareness campaign among Twitter users.

Methods

Prospective data collection was employed to accumulate Korean tweets containing the keywords "colorectal cancer," "colorectal cancer awareness campaign," "gold ribbon," and/or "love handle," from August 1 to September 30, 2014. Twitter users and contents were analyzed, and the credibility of information-sharing tweets throughout the study period was evaluated.

Results

In total, 10,387 tweets shared by 1,452 unique users were analyzed. As for users, 57.8% were individuals whereas 5.8% were organizations/communities; spambots accounted for a considerable percentage (36.4%). As for content, most tweets were spam (n = 8,736, 84.1%), repetitively advertising unverified commercial folk remedies, followed by tweets that shared information (n = 1,304, 12.6%) and non-information (n = 347, 3.3%). In the credibility assessment, only 80.6% of the information-sharing tweets were medically correct. After spam tweets had been excluded, a significant increase was seen in the percentage of information-sharing tweets (77.1% to 81.1%, P = 0.045) during the awareness campaign month.

Conclusion

Most Korean tweets regarding colorectal cancer during the study months were commercial spam tweets; informative public tweets accounted for an extremely small percentage. The transmissibility of the awareness campaign among Twitter users was questionable at best. To expand the reach of credible medical information on colorectal cancer, public health institutions and organizations must pay greater attention to social media.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Social Media–Based Cancer Education: Bibliometric and Thematic Analysis
Yang Xie, Zhenning Guo, Xiangning Zeng, Denghui Zhai, Gaoqiang Zhai, Yinzhou Feng, Huang Huang
JMIR Cancer.2025; 11: e77214. CrossRef
Quality of Cancer-Related Information on New Media (2014-2023): Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Xue-Jing Liu, Danny Valdez, Maria A Parker, Andi Mai, Eric R Walsh-Buhi
Journal of Medical Internet Research.2025; 27: e73185. CrossRef
Public effect of the 2022 Colorectal Cancer Awareness Campaign delivered through a metaverse platform
Tae-Gyun Lee, Gil-Hyeon Song, Hong-min Ahn, Heung-Kwon Oh, Moonkyoung Byun, Eon Chul Han, Sohyun Kim, Chang Woo Kim, Hye Jin Kim, Samin Hong, Kee-Ho Song, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Beom Cho
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(2): 145. CrossRef
Perspectives and Experiences of Patients With Thyroid Cancer at a Global Level: Retrospective Descriptive Study of Twitter Data
Sununtha Meksawasdichai, Tassanee Lerksuthirat, Boonsong Ongphiphadhanakul, Chutintorn Sriphrapradang
JMIR Cancer.2023; 9: e48786. CrossRef
Network’s reciprocity: a key determinant of information diffusion over Twitter
Mahima Gupta, Tripti Ghosh Sharma, Vinu Cheruvil Thomas
Behaviour & Information Technology.2022; 41(11): 2355. CrossRef
Are social networks effective in promoting healthy behaviors? A systematic review of evaluations of public health campaigns broadcast on Twitter
Mireia Faus, Francisco Alonso, Arash Javadinejad, Sergio A. Useche
Frontiers in Public Health.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
The value of health awareness days, weeks and months: A systematic review
Erin Vernon, Zachary Gottesman, Raechel Warren
Social Science & Medicine.2021; 268: 113553. CrossRef
Use of Social Media to Promote Cancer Screening and Early Diagnosis: Scoping Review
Ruth Plackett, Aradhna Kaushal, Angelos P Kassianos, Aaron Cross, Douglas Lewins, Jessica Sheringham, Jo Waller, Christian von Wagner
Journal of Medical Internet Research.2020; 22(11): e21582. CrossRef
Diffusion of blockchain technology
Purva Grover, Arpan Kumar Kar, Marijn Janssen
Journal of Enterprise Information Management.2019; 32(5): 735. CrossRef
The impact of social media on citation rates in coloproctology
J. W. Jeong, M. J. Kim, H.‐K. Oh, S. Jeong, M. H. Kim, J. R. Cho, D.‐W. Kim, S.‐B. Kang
Colorectal Disease.2019; 21(10): 1175. CrossRef
Social media and colorectal cancer: A systematic review of available resources
Gianluca Pellino, Constantinos Simillis, Shengyang Qiu, Shahnawaz Rasheed, Sarah Mills, Oliver Warren, Christos Kontovounisios, Paris P. Tekkis, Deanna J. Attai
PLOS ONE.2017; 12(8): e0183031. CrossRef
Disease-specific hashtags and the creation of Twitter medical communities in hematology and oncology
Naveen Pemmaraju, Michael A. Thompson, Muzaffar Qazilbash
Seminars in Hematology.2017; 54(4): 189. CrossRef
How Can We Ameliorate the Role of Colorectal Cancer Awareness Month?
Weon-Young Chang
Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(5): 160. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search