Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Original Articles

Benign proctology,Surgical technique

Transperineal rectocele repair is ideal for patients presenting with fecal incontinence: Marie Shella De Robles, Christopher J. Young; Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(5):376-379. Published online October 19, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00157.0022

6,217 View
180 Download
3 Web of Science
3 Citations

Purpose
Rectocele can be associated with both obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence. There exists a great variety of operative techniques to treat patients with rectocele. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome in a consecutive series of patients who underwent transperineal repair of rectocele when presenting with fecal incontinence as the predominant symptom.
Methods
Twenty-three consecutive patients from April 2000 to July 2015 with symptomatic rectocele underwent transperineal repair by a single surgeon.
Results
All patients had a history of vaginal delivery, with or without evidence of associated anal sphincter injury at the time. The median age of the cohort was 53 years (range, 21–90 years). None were fully continent preoperatively. However, continence improved to just rare mucus soiling or loss of flatus in all patients 6 months after their surgery. There was no operative mortality. Postoperative complications including urinary retention and wound dehiscence occurred in 3 patients.
Conclusion
Fecal incontinence associated with rectocele is multifactorial and may be caused by preexisting anal sphincteric damage and attenuation. Our experience suggests that transperineal repair provides excellent anatomic and physiologic results with minimal morbidity in selected patients presenting with combined rectocele and anal sphincter defect.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Fecal Incontinence Outcomes Following Transvaginal Posterior Vaginal Wall Repair
Jersey B. Burns, Amr El Haraki, Jesseca Crawford, Candace Y. Parker-Autry
International Urogynecology Journal.2025; 36(5): 1061. CrossRef
IUGA Opinion Paper on Obstructed Defecation: Management of Clinical and Proctographic Rectoceles
Suneetha Rachaneni, Hans Peter Dietz, Pallavi Latthe, Annie Sirany, Anna Spivak, Anupreet Dua
International Urogynecology Journal.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Constipation
Karim Alavi, Amy J. Thorsen, Sandy H. Fang, Pamela L. Burgess, Gino Trevisani, Amy L. Lightner, Daniel L. Feingold, Ian M. Paquette
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2024; 67(10): 1244. CrossRef

Benign GI diease,Benign diesease & IBD,Complication,Surgical technique

Triple-Staple Technique Effectively Reduces Operating Time for Rectal Anastomosis: Marie Shella De Robles, Christopher John Young; Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(1):16-20. Published online February 5, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.06.30

6,632 View
166 Download
10 Web of Science
10 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
Stapled anastomotic techniques to the distal rectum have gained widespread acceptance due to their procedural advantages. Various modifications in the stapling techniques have evolved since their inception. The triple-staple technique utilizing stapled closure of both the proximal colon and distal rectal stump provides a rapid and secure colorectal anastomosis. The aims of this study were to determine the safety and efficacy of the triple-staple technique and to compare the clinical outcomes with a historical control group for which the conventional double-staple technique had been performed.
Methods
One hundred consecutive patients operated on by a single surgeon were included in the study; 50 patients who underwent a double-staple (DSA) procedure and 50 patients undergoing triple-staple anastomosis (TSA).
Results
The most common indication for surgery in both groups was rectal cancer followed by diverticular disease and distal sigmoid cancer. There was no significant difference in number of patients requiring loop ileostomy formation in the groups (TSA, 56.0% vs. DSA, 68.0%; P = 0.621). The mean operating time for the TSA group was significantly shorter compared to that of the DSA group (TSA, 242.8 minutes vs. DSA, 306.1 minutes; P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in complication rate (TSA, 40% vs. DSA, 50%; P = 0.315) or length of hospital stay between the two groups (TSA, 11.3 days vs. DSA, 13.0 days; P = 0.246). Postoperative complications included anastomotic leak, prolonged ileus, bleeding, wound infection, and pelvic collection.
Conclusion
The triple-staple technique is a safe alternative to double-staple anastomosis after anterior resection and effectively shortens operating time.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Single versus double stapled anastomosis in natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) laparoscopic anterior resection
Abdus Salam Raju, Seyed Mohammad Javad Taghavi, Andrew James Gilmore
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2025; 95(6): 1198. CrossRef
Sphincter-preserving surgical techniques in low rectal cancer management: A systematic review of contemporary evidence
Song Wang, A-Jian Li, Hui-Hong Jiang, Yin Lin, Hai-Bo Ding
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304. CrossRef
Double-row staple technology versus triple-row staple technology for colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Tyler McKechnie, Victoria Shi, Elena Huang, Bright Huo, Aristithes Doumouras, Nalin Amin, Cagla Eskicioglu, Dennis Hong
Surgery.2024; 176(3): 633. CrossRef
The Colorectal Anastomosis: A Timeless Challenge
Alexander A. Gaidarski III, Marco Ferrara
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2023; 36(01): 011. CrossRef
Fluorescence-guided colorectal surgery: applications, clinical results, and protocols
Jin-Min Jung, In Ja Park, Eun Jung Park, Gyung Mo Son
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 252. CrossRef
Preventing Anastomotic Leakage, a Devastating Complication of Colorectal Surgery
Hyun Gu Lee
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer
Sung Uk Bae
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 577. CrossRef
Current Status and Future of Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
Sung Uk Bae
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 221. CrossRef
Effort to Improve Rectal Anastomosis: the Triple-Stapled Technique for Rectal Anastomosis
Sung Il Kang
Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(1): 1. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search