Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Erratum

Erratum: Biofeedback Therapy Before Ileostomy Closure in Patients Undergoing Sphincter-Saving Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Pilot Study: Jeong-Ki Kim, Byeong Geon Jeon, Yoon Suk Song, Mi Sun Seo, Yoon-Hye Kwon, JI Won Park, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park; Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(5):205-205. Published online October 31, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.5.205

4,607 View
37 Download

PDF

Original Articles

Biofeedback Therapy Before Ileostomy Closure in Patients Undergoing Sphincter-Saving Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Pilot Study: Jeong-Ki Kim, Byeong Geon Jeon, Yoon Suk Song, Mi Sun Seo, Yoon-Hye Kwon, JI Won Park, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park; Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(4):138-143. Published online August 31, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.4.138

6,320 View
73 Download
14 Web of Science
14 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

This study prospectively investigated the effects of biofeedback therapy on objective anorectal function and subjective bowel function in patients after sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer.

Methods

Sixteen patients who underwent an ileostomy were randomized into two groups, one receiving conservative management with the Kegel maneuver and the other receiving active biofeedback before ileostomy closure. Among them, 12 patients (mean age, 57.5 years; range, 38 to 69 years; 6 patients in each group) completed the study. Conservative management included lifestyle modifications, Kegel exercises, and medication. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after ileostomy closure by using anal manometry, modified Wexner Incontinence Scores (WISs), and fecal incontinence quality of life (FI-QoL) scores.

Results

Before the ileostomy closure, the groups did not differ in baseline clinical characteristics or resting manometric parameters. After 12 months of follow-up, the biofeedback group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the mean maximum squeezing pressure (from 146.3 to 178.9, P = 0.002). However, no beneficial effect on the WIS was noted for biofeedback compared to conservative management alone. Overall, the FI-QoL scores were increased significantly in both groups after ileostomy closure (P = 0.006), but did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Conclusion

Although the biofeedback therapy group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the maximum squeezing pressure, significant improvements in the WISs and the FI-QoL scores over time were noted in both groups. The study was terminated early because no therapeutic benefit of biofeedback had been demonstrated.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training in the recovery of patients after low anterior resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Min Jeong Kim, Seonmi Yeom, Young Man Kim
European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2025; 77: 102918. CrossRef
BENEFÍCIOS DA FISIOTERAPIA EM PACIENTES COLOSTOMIZADOS E ILEOSTOMIZADOS: UMA REVISÃO NARRATIVA
Ana Carolina Aboukalam da Cruz, Anderson Viana Pantoja, Leonardo Gomes de Souza, Maicon Maximiliano de Almeida, Marcus Vinicius Henriques Brito, George Alberto da Silva Dias
REVISTA FOCO.2025; 18(7): e9137. CrossRef
The effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions on fecal incontinence and quality of life following colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Ming Yan Pun, Pak Ho Leung, Tsz Ching Chan, Chunn Pang, Kin Hei Chan, Priya Kannan
Supportive Care in Cancer.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Application of pelvic floor rehabilitation in patients with colorectal cancer: a scoping review
Lu Zhou, Changkun Zhong, Yuanyuan Su, Zhengyang Zhang, Ling Wang
Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Patients Following Low Anterior Resection
Young Man Kim, Eui Geum Oh
Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing.2023; 50(2): 142. CrossRef
ILEOSTIM trial: a study protocol to evaluate the effectiveness of efferent loop stimulation before ileostomy reversal
N. Blanco, I. Oliva, P. Tejedor, E. Pastor, A. Alvarellos, C. Pastor, J. Baixauli, J. Arredondo
Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(12): 1251. CrossRef
Low anterior resection syndrome
Seung‐Bum Ryoo
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2023; 7(5): 719. CrossRef
Efficacy of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Postoperative Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Yuki Nakashima, Kenichi Fudeyasu, Yuki Kataoka, Shunsuke Taito, Takashi Ariie, Yukio Mikami
Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
„Low anterior resection syndrome“ – Ursachen und therapeutische Ansätze
Sigmar Stelzner, Juliane Kupsch, Sören Torge Mees
Der Chirurg.2021; 92(7): 612. CrossRef
Anterior resection syndrome: a randomized clinical trial of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (ramosetron) in male patients with rectal cancer
S -B Ryoo, J W Park, D W Lee, M A Lee, Y -H Kwon, M J Kim, S H Moon, S -Y Jeong, K J Park
British Journal of Surgery.2021; 108(6): 644. CrossRef
Investigating Risk Factors for Complications after Ileostomy Reversal in Low Anterior Rectal Resection Patients: An Observational Study
Mateusz Rubinkiewicz, Jan Witowski, Michał Wysocki, Magdalena Pisarska, Stanisław Kłęk, Andrzej Budzyński, Michał Pędziwiatr
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2019; 8(10): 1567. CrossRef
Mind–Body Interventions for Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients in the Chinese Population: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Weidong Wang, Fang Wang, Feng Fan, Ana Cristina Sedas, Jian Wang
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine.2017; 24(2): 191. CrossRef
Lentivirus‐mediated shRNA interference of ghrelin receptor blocks proliferation in the colorectal cancer cells
An Liu, Chenggang Huang, Jia Xu, Xuehong Cai
Cancer Medicine.2016; 5(9): 2417. CrossRef
Biofeedback Therapy After Sphincter-Preservation Surgery for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer
Ik Yong Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(4): 119. CrossRef

Surgical Treatment of a Parastomal Hernia: Seung Chul Heo, Heung-Kwon Oh, Yoon Suk Song, Mi Sun Seo, Eun Kyung Choe, Seungbum Ryoo, Kyu Joo Park; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(4):174-179. Published online August 31, 2011; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.4.174

6,595 View
36 Download
10 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

Parastomal hernia is a major complication of an intestinal stoma. This study was performed to compare the results of various operative methods to treat parastomal hernias.

Methods

Results of surgical treatment for parastomal hernias (postoperative recurrence, complications and postoperative hospital stays) were surveyed in 39 patients over an 11-year period. The patients enrolled in this study underwent surgery by a single surgeon to exclude surgeon bias.

Results

Seventeen patients were male, and twenty-two patients were female. The mean age was 65.9 years (range, 36 to 86 years). The stomas were 35 sigmoid-end-colostomies (90%), 2 loop-colostomies (5%), and 2 double-barrel-colostomies. Over half of the hernias developed within two years after initial formation. Stoma relocation was performed in 8 patients, suture repair in 14 patients and mesh repair in 17 patients. Seven patients had recurrence of the hernia, and ten patients suffered from complications. Postoperative complications and recurrence were more frequent in stoma relocation than in suture repair and mesh repair. Emergency operations were performed in four patients (10.3%) with higher incidence of complications but not with increased risk of recurrence. Excluding emergency operations, complications of relocations were not higher than those of mesh repairs. Postoperative hospital stays were shortest in mesh repair patients.

Conclusion

In this study, mesh repair showed low recurrence and a low complication rate with shorter hospital stay than relocation methods, though these differences were not statistically significant. Further studies, including randomized trials, are necessary if more reliable data on the surgical treatment of parastomal hernias are to be obtained.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Long-term outcomes after open parastomal hernia repair at a high-volume center
Alexis M. Holland, William R. Lorenz, Brittany S. Mead, Gregory T. Scarola, Vedra A. Augenstein, B. Todd Heniford, Monica E. Polcz
Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(1): 639. CrossRef
Parastomal Hernia: direct repair versus relocation: is stoma relocation worth the risk? A comparative meta-analysis and systematic review
Ahmed Abdelsamad, Mohammed Khaled Mohammed, Mohamed Badr Almoshantaf, Aya Alrawi, Ziad A. Fadl, Ziad Tarek, Nada Osama Aboelmajd, Torsten Herzog, Florian Gebauer, Nada K. Abdelsattar, Taha Abd-ElSalam Ashraf Taha
Updates in Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Outcomes of surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a bayesian network meta-analysis
Jose Martín-Arévalo, Victoria Alejandra Lopez-Callejon, David Moro-Valdezate, Stephanie Anne Garcia-Botello, Leticia Perez-Santiago, Monica Millan, Fernando Lopez-Mozos, Guillermo Lillo-Albert, Julieta Puente-Monserrat, Vicente Pla-Marti
Hernia.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Stoma-Related Complications: A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review
Zalán Benedek, Loránd Kocsis, Orsolya Bauer, Nicolae Suciu, Sorin Sorlea, Călin Crăciun, Rareș Georgescu, Marius Florin Coroș
Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine.2022; 7(2): 31. CrossRef
The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in emergency colorectal surgery
Andrew S. Miller, Kathryn Boyce, Benjamin Box, Matthew D. Clarke, Sarah E. Duff, Niamh M. Foley, Richard J. Guy, Lisa H. Massey, George Ramsay, Dominic A. J. Slade, James A. Stephenson, Phil J. Tozer, Danette Wright
Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(2): 476. CrossRef
Prevention and treatment of parastomal hernia: a position statement on behalf of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland

Colorectal Disease.2018; 20(S2): 5. CrossRef
Repair of complex parastomal hernias
G. S. Hwang, M. H. Hanna, J. C. Carmichael, S. D. Mills, A. Pigazzi, M. J. Stamos
Techniques in Coloproctology.2015; 19(3): 127. CrossRef
Systematic review of open techniques for parastomal hernia repair
J. Al Shakarchi, J. G. Williams
Techniques in Coloproctology.2014; 18(5): 427. CrossRef
Korrektur der parastomalen Hernie mit Netz
A. Lampel, N. Runkel
Der Urologe.2012; 51(7): 965. CrossRef
Analysis of Risk Factors for the Development of Incisional and Parastomal Hernias in Patients after Colorectal Surgery
In Ho Song, Heon-Kyun Ha, Sang-Gi Choi, Byeong Geon Jeon, Min Jung Kim, Kyu Joo Park
Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2012; 28(6): 299. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search