Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
12 "Min Jung Kim"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Original Article
Benign bowel disease
Development of a home health care service platform for ostomy patient management
Seongwoo Yang, Ji Won Park, Hyuk Hur, Min Jung Kim, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyounghoon Park, Ik Yong Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(1):36-43.   Published online November 21, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00360.0051
  • 5,221 View
  • 312 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The use of an ostomy for urination and defecation leads to reduced quality of life. Although many ostomy management strategies are needed, such strategies are often implemented by patients. Thus, there is a need for a home health care service platform that can be used in ostomy patient management.
Methods
We developed an ostomy patient management platform by identifying the needs of patients and medical staff through the Chronic Care Ostomy Self-Management Training Program in the United States and from studies conducted in Korea.
Results
The platform encompassed physical management, psychological management, maintenance of social function, spiritual stability, and home medical care. These components were implemented through monitoring, self-care guidance, and a community platform. For the monitoring function, patients entered their health status in a mobile application (app); the medical staff at the affiliated hospital then monitored the stoma status through a web interface.
Conclusion
Our platform allows medical staff to monitor ostomy patients through a web interface and help such patients to fully manage their ostomy at home using an app. We expect that the continued development of patient-oriented functions in our app will allow ostomy patients to experience quality-of-life improvements.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Applications of Telemedicine in Patients with an Ostomy: A Scoping Review
    Zhuang Hui-Ren, Zhang Jin, Zheng Pian, Zhang Wei-ying
    Advances in Skin & Wound Care.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Lebensqualität von Stomapatienten
    Michael S. Kasparek
    coloproctology.2023; 45(4): 242.     CrossRef
Case Report
Benign GI diease
Small Bowel Perforation Associated With Gastrointestinal Graft-Versus-Host Disease and Cytomegalovirus Enteritis in a Patient With Leukemia: A Case Report With Literature Review
Kwang-Seop Song, Min Jung Kim, Han-Ki Lim, Yoon Hwa Hong, Sung Sil Park, Chang Won Hong, Sung Chan Park, Dae Kyung Sohn, Kyung Su Han, Jae Hwan Oh
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):281-284.   Published online August 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.10.01.1
  • 3,739 View
  • 89 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) is a common complication after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Concomitant cytomegalovirus (CMV) enteritis worsens the prognosis of this condition. We report a case of small bowel perforation associated with gastrointestinal GVHD and CMV enteritis in a patient with leukemia who was successfully treated surgically. A 39-year-old man presented with intestinal perforation necessitating emergency surgical intervention. He was diagnosed with T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and developed severe gastrointestinal GVHD and CMV enteritis after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. His terminal ileum showed a perforation with diffuse wall thinning, and petechiae were observed over long segments of the distal ileum and the proximal colon. Small bowel segmental resection and a subtotal colectomy with a double-barreled ileocolostomy were performed. The patient recovered uneventfully after the operation. Based on reports described in the literature, surgery plays a minor role in the management of gastrointestinal GVHD; however, timely surgical intervention could be effective in selected patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Cytomegalovirus enteritis resistant to antiviral drugs improved following total colectomy
    Sae Kawata, Jumpei Takamatsu, Yuichi Yasue, Aya Fukuhara, Jinkoo Kang
    Surgical Case Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
Original Articles
Oncologic Outcomes in Patients Who Undergo Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy and Total Mesorectal Excision for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A 14-Year Experience in a Single Institution
Min Jung Kim, Seung-Yong Jeong, Ji Won Park, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Sang Sik Cho, Ki Young Lee, Kyu Joo Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(2):83-93.   Published online April 30, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.04.22.1
  • 4,986 View
  • 97 Download
  • 20 Web of Science
  • 18 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study evaluated the oncologic outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer patients who underwent preoperative neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by surgery and determined the prognostic significance of pathologic complete response (pCR).
Methods
Between January 2002 and December 2015, 580 patients with rectal cancer who underwent surgery after neoadjuvant CRT were identified. Survival according to tumor response to CRT and pathologic stage was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify factors associated with survival outcomes.
Results
A total of 111 patients (23.7%) achieved pCR while the other 469 patients showed residual disease. Patients with pCR had a lower pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen level and earlier cT classification than those with residual disease. With a median follow-up of 78 months, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly better in the pCR group than in the residual disease group. The 5-year DFS and 5-year OS for patients with ypStage 0, I, II, or III were 92.5%, 85.1%, 72.2%, 54.3% (P < 0.001) and 94.5%, 91.0%, 83.1%, 69.3%, respectively (P < 0.001). Pathologic AJCC stage after CRT was the most statistically significant independent predictor of OS (HR, 6.97 [95% confidence interval, 3.16–15.39] for stage III vs. stage 0) and DFS (HR, 7.30 [95% confidence interval, 3.63–14.67] for stage III vs. stage 0).
Conclusion
Rectal cancer patients who achieved pCR showed improved survival compared to those with residual disease after preoperative CRT. Moreover, pCR was an independent indicator of OS and DFS, and pathologic AJCC stage was correlated with survival after preoperative CRT.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Analysis of clinical and pathological prognostic factors of survival in rectal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative radiochemotherapy
    Sarhan Sydney Saad, Nora Forones, Gaspar Lopes Filho, Jaques Waisberg, Elesiario Caetano Júnior, Ricardo Artigiani-Neto, Delcio Matos
    Acta Cirúrgica Brasileira.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predicting Positive Radial Margin on Restaging MRI of Patients with Low Rectal Cancer: Can We Do Better?
    Anurima Patra, Aisha Lakhani, Antony Augustine, Priyanka Mohapatra, Anu Eapen, Ashish Singh, Dipti Masih, Thomas S. Ram, Mark R. Jesudason, Rohin Mittal, Anuradha Chandramohan
    Indian Journal of Radiology and Imaging.2024; 34(01): 85.     CrossRef
  • A Review of Neoadjuvant Therapy and the Watch-and-Wait Protocol in Rectal Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions
    Iulian M Slavu, Octavian Munteanu, Florin Filipoiu, Raluca Tulin, Anca Monica Macovei Oprescu , Ileana Dima, Iulian A Dogaru, Adrian Tulin
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Significant Pathologic Response Following Neoadjuvant Therapy and Curative Resection in Patients With Rectal Cancer: Surgical and Oncological Outcomes From a Retrospective Cohort Study
    Fatemeh Shahabi, Majid Ansari, Khadijeh Najafi Ghobadi, Abolfazl Ghahramani, Amiresmaeil Parandeh, Maryam Saberi‐Karimian, Ala Orafaie, Abbas Abdollahi
    Cancer Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical Implication of Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
    In Ja Park
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022; 45(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early rectal cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Sung Hwan Cho, Byung-Soo Park, Hyun Sung Kim, Su Bum Park, Hyung Wook Kim, Sang Bo Oh, Tae Un Kim, Dong Hoon Shin
    Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(1): 32.     CrossRef
  • Watch and wait strategies for rectal cancer: A systematic review
    In Ja Park
    Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(2): 91.     CrossRef
  • Patient Survival With ypT0N+ Following Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer
    Mohamedraed Elshami, Robert N. Goldstone, Lawrence S. Blaszkowsky, James C. Cusack, Theodore S. Hong, Jennifer Y. Wo, Motaz Qadan
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2022; 65(10): 1224.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy Dose Escalation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Modern Treatment Approaches and Outcomes
    N. Hearn, D. Atwell, K. Cahill, J. Elks, D. Vignarajah, J. Lagopoulos, M. Min
    Clinical Oncology.2021; 33(1): e1.     CrossRef
  • Can normalized carcinoembryonic antigen following neoadjuvant chemoradiation predict tumour recurrence after curative resection for locally advanced rectal cancer?
    Youngki Hong, Amandeep Ghuman, Keat Seong Poh, Dimitri Krizzuk, Arun Nagarajan, Sudha Amarnath, Juan J. Nogueras, Steven D. Wexner, Giovanna DaSilva
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(6): 1346.     CrossRef
  • Omission of or Poor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Impacts Radial Margin Positivity Rates in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Ana Sofia Ore, Gabrielle E. Dombek, Carlos A. Cordova-Cassia, Jeanne F. Quinn, Thomas E. Cataldo, Benjamin L. Schlechter, Matthew J. Abrams, Evangelos Messaris
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2021; 64(6): 669.     CrossRef
  • Optimal Postoperative Surveillance Strategies for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study
    Min-Young Park, In-Ja Park, Hyo-Seon Ryu, Jay Jung, Min-Sung Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang-Sik Yu, Jin-Cheon Kim
    Cancers.2021; 13(14): 3502.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with ypT0–1 rectal cancer treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy
    Ye Won Jeon, In Ja Park, Jeong Eun Kim, Jin-Hong Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Jong Lyul Lee, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2021; 13(9): 1000.     CrossRef
  • Comparison between Local Excision and Radical Resection for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer in ypT0-1 Patients: An Analysis of the Clinicopathological Factors and Survival Rates
    Soo Young Oh, In Ja Park, Young IL Kim, Jong-Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Cancers.2021; 13(19): 4823.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant radiotherapy dose escalation for locally advanced rectal cancers in the new era of radiotherapy: A review of literature
    Durim Delishaj, Ilaria Costanza Fumagalli, Stefano Ursino, Agostino Cristaudo, Francesco Colangelo, Antonio Stefanelli, Alessandro Alghisi, Giuseppe De Nobili, Romerai D’Amico, Alessandra Cocchi, Antonio Ardizzoia, Carlo Pietro Soatti
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2021; 9(30): 9077.     CrossRef
  • Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review
    Min Chul Kim, Jae Hwan Oh
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 382.     CrossRef
  • Functional outcomes after sphincter-preserving surgeries for low-lying rectal cancer: A review
    Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Precision and Future Medicine.2021; 5(4): 164.     CrossRef
  • From Total Mesorectal Excision to Organ Preservation for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer
    Seong Kyu Baek
    Annals of Coloproctology.2019; 35(2): 51.     CrossRef
Female Sex and Right-Sided Tumor Location Are Poor Prognostic Factors for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer After a Curative Resection
Jung Ho Park, Hyoung-Chul Park, Sung Chan Park, Jae Hwan Oh, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang, Seung Chul Heo, Min Jung Kim, Ji Won Park, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park, for the Seoul Colorectal Group (SECOG)
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):286-291.   Published online December 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.10.29
  • 5,020 View
  • 118 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Stage-IIIC colon cancer is an advanced disease; however, its oncologic outcomes and prognostic factors remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine the predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage-IIIC colon cancer.
Methods
From a multicenter database, we retrospectively enrolled 611 patients (355 men and 256 women) who had undergone a potentially curative resection for a stage-IIIC colon adenocarcinoma between 2003 and 2011. The primary end-point was the 5-year DFS.
Results
The median age was 62 years; 213 and 398 patients had right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (LCC), respectively. The 5-year DFS in all patients was 52.0%; median follow-up time was 35 months (range, 1–134 months). A multivariate Cox regression revealed that female sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19–1.90; P < 0.01), right-sided tumor location (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.29–2.11; P < 0.01), lymphatic invasion (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.08–2.15; P < 0.01) and a high (≥0.4) metastatic lymph node ratio (HR, 3.72; 95% CI, 2.63–5.24; P < 0.01) were independent predictors of worse 5-year DFS. Female patients with RCC were 1.79 fold more likely to experience recurrence than male patients with LCC.
Conclusion
Female sex and right-sided tumor location are associated with higher tumor recurrence rates in patients with stage-IIIC colon cancers. Aggressive treatment and close surveillance should be planned for patients in these groups.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Development and external validation of a nomogram predicting overall survival after curative resection of colon cancer
    Shuanhu Wang, Yakui Liu, Yi Shi, Jiajia Guan, Mulin Liu, Wenbin Wang
    Journal of International Medical Research.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
Clinical Outcomes of Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients With Sigmoid Colon Cancer: Surgery With 1 Surgeon and 1 Camera Operator
Jung Ryul Oh, Sung Chan Park, Sung Sil Park, Beonghoon Sohn, Hyoung Min Oh, Bun Kim, Min Jung Kim, Chang Won Hong, Kyung Su Han, Dae Kyung Sohn, Jae Hwan Oh
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):292-298.   Published online December 3, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.04.06
  • 7,705 View
  • 108 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study compared the perioperative clinical outcomes of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery (RPLS) with those of conventional multiport laparoscopic surgery (MPLS) for patients with sigmoid colon cancer and investigated the safety and feasibility of RPLS performed by 1 surgeon and 1 camera operator.
Methods
From the beginning of 2010 until the end of 2014, 605 patients underwent a colectomy for sigmoid colon cancer. We compared the characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and pathologic results for the patients who underwent RPLS and for the patients who underwent MPLS. We also compared the clinical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and 3-port laparoscopic surgery.
Results
Of the 115 patients in the RPLS group, 59 underwent SILS and 56 underwent 3-port laparoscopic surgery. The MPLS group included 490 patients. The RPLS group had shorter operating time (137.4 ± 43.2 minutes vs. 155.5 ± 47.9 minutes, P < 0.001) and shorter incision length (5.3 ± 2.2 cm vs. 7.8 ± 1.2 cm, P < 0.001) than the MPLS group. In analyses of SILS and 3-port laparoscopic surgery, the SILS group showed younger age, longer operating time, and shorter incision length than the 3-port surgery group and exhibited a more advanced T stage, more lymphatic invasion, and larger tumor size.
Conclusion
RPLS performed by 1 surgeon and 1 camera operator appears to be a feasible and safe surgical option for the treatment of patients with sigmoid colon cancer, showing comparable clinical outcomes with shorter operation time and shorter incision length than MPLS. SILS can be applied to patients with favorable tumor characteristics.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacy and safety of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer
    Zhi-min Liu, Qi-jun Yao, Fengyun Pei, Fang He, Yandong Zhao, Jun Huang
    BMC Cancer.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Short-term and long-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a propensity-matched cohort study with conventional laparoscopic surgery
    Mingyi Wu, Hao Wang, Xuehua Zhang, Jiaolong Shi, Xiaoliang Lan, Tingyu Mou, Yanan Wang
    BMC Gastroenterology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Long-term Oncologic Outcomes of Single-Incision Plus One-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer
    Yasumitsu Hirano, Chikashi Hiranuma, Masakazu Hattori, Kenji Douden
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2021; 83(3): 691.     CrossRef
  • LongTerm Outcomes of Three-Port Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy Versus Five-Port Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: A Retrospective Study
    Tao Zhang, Yaqi Zhang, Xiaonan Shen, Yi Shi, Xiaopin Ji, Shaodong Wang, Zijia Song, Xiaoqian Jing, Feng Ye, Ren Zhao
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Short‐ And medium‐term outcomes of reduced‐port laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with upper rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study
    Huawen Wu, Zhijian Zheng, Lewei Xu, Yingying Wu, Ziyi Guan, Wenhuan Li, Guofu Chen
    Cancer Medicine.2020; 9(15): 5320.     CrossRef
Review
Lateral Lymph Node Dissection With the Focus on Indications, Functional Outcomes, and Minimally Invasive Surgery
Min Jung Kim, Jae Hwan Oh
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(5):229-233.   Published online October 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.10.26
  • 6,181 View
  • 182 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 13 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
The lateral lymph node dissection (LLND) is still a subject of great debate as to the appropriate treatment for patients with mid to low advanced rectal cancer. The guidelines of the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum recommend a LLND for patients with T3/4 rectal cancer below the peritoneal reflection. However, in most Western countries, a routine LLND is not recommended unless a node or nodes are clinically suspicious for metastasis. Even after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT), an 8% to 12% lateral pelvic recurrence was noted. The size of the lateral lymph node and responsiveness to preoperative CRT should be the main factors for selecting appropriate patients to undergo a LLND. In addition, from the recent literature, a laparoscopic LLND is safe and oncologically feasible and might have some advantages in short-term outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Totally Extraperitoneal Approach for Recurrent Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes After Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Tae-Gyun Lee, Hongmin Ahn, Hye-Rim Shin, Mi Jeong Choi, Min Hyeong Jo, Heung-Kwon Oh, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Extraperitoneal Approach for Lateral Pelvic Node Dissection in Rectal Cancer: Techniques and Short-Term Outcomes
    Ji-Seon Kim, Jin Kim, Se-Jin Baek, Hyunmi Park, Jung-Myun Kwak, Seon-Hahn Kim
    Surgical Innovation.2023; 30(1): 13.     CrossRef
  • Lateral pelvic sentinel lymph node biopsy using indocyanine green fluorescence navigation: can it be a powerful supplement tool for predicting the status of lateral pelvic lymph nodes in advanced lower rectal cancer
    Hao Su, Zheng Xu, Mandula Bao, Shou Luo, Jianwei Liang, Wei Pei, Xu Guan, Zheng Liu, Zheng Jiang, Mingguang Zhang, Zhixun Zhao, Weisen Jin, Haitao Zhou
    Surgical Endoscopy.2023; 37(5): 4088.     CrossRef
  • Anatomical Validation of Internal Iliac Vessels Assessed by Three-dimensional Angiographic Analysis
    Yuya Takenaka, Naohito Beppu, Masaki Otani, Kazuma Ito, Ayako Imada, Takaaki Matsubara, Jihyung Song, Kei Kimura, Kozo Kataoka, Motoi Uchino, Hiroki Ikeuchi, Masataka Ikeda
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2023; 7(3): 186.     CrossRef
  • Indocyanine green dye and its application in gastrointestinal surgery: The future is bright green
    Zavier Yongxuan Lim, Swetha Mohan, Sunder Balasubramaniam, Saleem Ahmed, Caroline Ching Hsia Siew, Vishal G Shelat
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 15(9): 1841.     CrossRef
  • Lateral Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer: Do we all Think the Same? A Review of Multidisciplinary Obstacles and Treatment Recommendations
    Tania C. Sluckin, Alice M. Couwenberg, Doenja M.J. Lambregts, Sanne-Marije J.A. Hazen, Karin Horsthuis, Philip Meijnen, Regina G.H. Beets-Tan, Pieter J. Tanis, Corrie A.M. Marijnen, Miranda Kusters
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2022; 21(2): 80.     CrossRef
  • Establishment and validation of a nomogram for predicting potential lateral pelvic lymph node metastasis in low rectal cancer
    Atsuhiko Sumii, Koya Hida, Yoshiharu Sakai, Nobuaki Hoshino, Daisuke Nishizaki, Tomonori Akagi, Meiki Fukuda, Tomohiro Yamaguchi, Ichiro Takemasa, Takuya Tokunaga, Jun Watanabe, Masahiko Watanabe
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 27(7): 1173.     CrossRef
  • Significant improvement after training in the assessment of lateral compartments and short-axis measurements of lateral lymph nodes in rectal cancer
    Tania C. Sluckin, Sanne-Marije J. A. Hazen, Karin Horsthuis, Doenja M. J. Lambregts, Regina G. H. Beets-Tan, Pieter J. Tanis, Miranda Kusters
    European Radiology.2022; 33(1): 483.     CrossRef
  • Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic lateral pelvic node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer
    Katsuji Tokuhara, Hidehiko Hishikawa, Terufumi Yoshida, Yosuke Ueyama, Kazuhiko Yoshioka, Mitsugu Sekimoto
    Surgical Endoscopy.2021; 35(4): 1572.     CrossRef
  • Effect of lateral lymph node dissection on the quality of life and genitourinary function after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
    Ryun Kyong Ha, Boram Park, Sung Chan Park, Hee Jin Chang, Jae Hwan Oh
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2021; 100(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • Does adding lateral pelvic lymph node dissection to neoadjuvant chemotherapy improve outcomes in low rectal cancer?
    Brendan Zhen Yang Law, Zeneera Yusuf, Yu En Ng, Emad H. Aly
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2020; 35(8): 1387.     CrossRef
  • Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of locally advanced low rectal cancer: Summary of the current evidence
    Mootaz Elhusseini, Emad H. Aly
    Surgical Oncology.2020; 35: 418.     CrossRef
  • Does lateral lymph node dissection for low rectal cancer improve overall survival? Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jeremy Meyer, Niki Christou, Christophe Combescure, Nicolas Buchs, Frédéric Ris
    International Journal of Surgery Protocols.2019; 17: 1.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Optimal Time Interval for Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Analysis of Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service Data
Min Jung Kim, Jin Suk Cho, Eun Mi Kim, Woo Ah Ko, Jae Hwan Oh
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(5):241-247.   Published online October 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.01.01
  • 5,883 View
  • 118 Download
  • 18 Web of Science
  • 19 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Pathologic downstaging of rectal cancer has been suggested to be associated with the time interval from chemoradiotherapy (CRT) completion to surgery. We aimed to evaluate the effect of this time interval for patients with rectal cancer on the pathologic response.
Methods
All patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant CRT with evaluable data were selected from among the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service data. Patients were divided into groups according to the time between CRT and surgery. CRT responses were analyzed.
Results
Two hundred forty-nine patients were included, of whom 86 (34.5%) were in the 5- to 7-week interval, 113 (45.4%) in the 7- to 9-week interval, 38 (15.3%) in the 9- to 11-week interval, and 12 (4.8%) in the >11-week interval. The median time interval between CRT completion and surgery was 7.4 weeks (range: 5–22.7 weeks; interquartile range, 6.7–8.7 weeks). Surgery 9–11 weeks after CRT completion resulted in the highest, but not statistically significant, pathologic complete response (pCR) rate (3 patients, 8.6%; P = 0.886), no pCR was noted in the >11-week interval group. Results for downstaging in the 9- to 11-week interval group were as follows: T downstaging, 38.2% (P = 0.735); N downstaging, 50.0% (P = 0.439); and TN downstaging, 52.9% (P = 0.087). The 3-year overall survival rates for the 5- to 7-week, 7- to 9-week, 9- to 11-week, and >11-week interval groups were 93.0%, 85.0%, 81.6%, and 91.7%, respectively (P = 0.326).
Conclusion
Delaying surgery by 9 to 11 weeks may increase TN downstaging, but delaying for over 11 weeks may not increase additional tumor downstaging from long-course CRT.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Time interval between neoadjuvant radiation therapy and surgery and overall survival of rectal cancer patients
    Saber A Amin, Megha Patel, Chi Lin
    Colorectal Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prediction of pathological complete response and prognosis in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Yi-Jun Xu, Dan Tao, Song-Bing Qin, Xiao-Yan Xu, Kai-Wen Yang, Zhong-Xu Xing, Ju-Ying Zhou, Yang Jiao, Li-Li Wang
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2024; 16(6): 2520.     CrossRef
  • Determining the optimal radiation‐surgery interval (RSI) for oncologic proctectomy following radiotherapy for rectal adenocarcinoma
    Matthew C. Bobel, Michael F. McGee
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 127(8): 1252.     CrossRef
  • A Predictive Model to Evaluate Pathologic Complete Response in Rectal Adenocarcinoma
    Shuiwang Qing, Lei Gu, Tingting Du, Xiaolan Yin, Ke-jia Zhang, Huo-jun Zhang
    Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Initial magnetic resonance imaging tumour regression grade (mrTRG) as response evaluation after neoadjuvant treatment predicts sustained complete response in patients with rectal cancer
    Chikako Suzuki, Sandra Kapoun Halperin, Per J. Nilsson, Anna Martling, Torbjörn Holm
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022; 48(7): 1643.     CrossRef
  • Does a long interval between neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery benefit the clinical outcomes of locally advanced rectal cancer? A systematic review and meta analyses
    Miao Yu, Deng-Chao Wang, Sheng Li, Li-Yan Huang, Jian Wei
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(4): 855.     CrossRef
  • Machine Learning for Sensing Applications: A Tutorial
    Vahideh Shirmohammadli, Behraad Bahreyni
    IEEE Sensors Journal.2022; 22(11): 10183.     CrossRef
  • Lymph Nodes With Germinal Centers Are Not Associated With Tumor Response After Neoadjuvant Treatment in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Ihsane El Otmani, Boubacar Effared, Fatima El Agy, Mohammed El Abkari, Khalid Mazaz, El Bachir Benjelloun, Abdelmalek Ousadden, Zineb Benbrahim, Touria Bouhafa, Laila Chbani
    Clinical Pathology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predictors of pathological complete response following neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
    Asif Mehraj, Arshad A Baba, Bushra Khan, Mudassir Ahmad Khan, Rauf A Wani, Fazl Q Parray, Nisar A Chowdri
    Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.2022; 18(Suppl 2): S391.     CrossRef
  • Timing to achieve the highest rate of pCR after preoperative radiochemotherapy in rectal cancer: a pooled analysis of 3085 patients from 7 randomized trials
    Maria Antonietta Gambacorta, Carlotta Masciocchi, Giuditta Chiloiro, Elisa Meldolesi, Gabriella Macchia, Johan van Soest, Fenke Peters, Laurence Collette, Jean-Pierre Gérard, Samuel Ngan, C. Claus Rödel, Andrea Damiani, Andre Dekker, Vincenzo Valentini
    Radiotherapy and Oncology.2021; 154: 154.     CrossRef
  • Improvement in the Assessment of Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and a Multigene Biomarker
    Eunhae Cho, Sung Woo Jung, In Ja Park, Jong Keon Jang, Seong Ho Park, Seung-Mo Hong, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Cancers.2021; 13(14): 3480.     CrossRef
  • Temporal determinants of tumour response to neoadjuvant rectal radiotherapy
    Kendrick Koo, Rachel Ward, Ryan L. Smith, Jeremy Ruben, Peter W. G. Carne, Hany Elsaleh, Mona Pathak
    PLOS ONE.2021; 16(6): e0254018.     CrossRef
  • Factors Predicting Pathological Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: The Experience of a Single Institution with 269 Patients (STONE-01)
    Michele Fiore, Pasquale Trecca, Luca E. Trodella, Roberto Coppola, Marco Caricato, Damiano Caputo, Alessandro Coppola, Gian M. Petrianni, Gabriele D’Ercole, Edy Ippolito, Rolando M. D’Angelillo, Sara Ramella
    Cancers.2021; 13(23): 6074.     CrossRef
  • Chemoradiotherapy alone or chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery in rectal cancer
    Fabian Lunger, Georgios Peros
    memo - Magazine of European Medical Oncology.2020; 13(3): 324.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Short-course Radiotherapy for Lower Rectal Cancer
    Hidenori Yanagi, Naohito Beppu, Ryo Okamoto, Yoshihiko Nakamoto, Takayoshi Nakajima, Noriko Ichise, Tsukasa Aihara, Norihiko Kamikonya
    Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2020; 73(10): 424.     CrossRef
  • Meta-analysis of the effect of extending the interval after long-course chemoradiotherapy before surgery in locally advanced rectal cancer
    É J Ryan, D P O'Sullivan, M E Kelly, A Z Syed, P C Neary, P R O'Connell, D O Kavanagh, D C Winter, J M O'Riordan
    British Journal of Surgery.2019; 106(10): 1298.     CrossRef
  • Impact of PET/CT for Restaging Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation
    Eric Sorenson, Fernando Lambreton, Jian Q. Yu, Tianyu Li, Crystal S. Denlinger, Joshua E. Meyer, Elin R. Sigurdson, Jeffrey M. Farma
    Journal of Surgical Research.2019; 243: 242.     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer management
    Gerard Feeney, Rishabh Sehgal, Margaret Sheehan, Aisling Hogan, Mark Regan, Myles Joyce, Michael Kerin
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 25(33): 4850.     CrossRef
  • Waiting and Hope: Optimal Time Interval for Surgery After Long-Course Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(5): 227.     CrossRef
Preoperative Tattooing Using Indocyanine Green in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
Sang Jae Lee, Dae Kyung Sohn, Kyung Su Han, Byung Chang Kim, Chang Won Hong, Sung Chan Park, Min Jung Kim, Byung Kwan Park, Jae Hwan Oh
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(4):206-211.   Published online July 26, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.09.25
  • 8,029 View
  • 185 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 18 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of indocyanine green (ICG) as a preoperative marking dye for laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Methods
Between March 2013 and March 2015, 174 patients underwent preoperative colonoscopic tattooing using 1.0 to 1.5 mL of ICG and saline solution before laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Patients’ medical records and operation videos were retrospectively assessed to evaluate the visibility, duration, and adverse effects of tattooing.
Results
The mean age of the patients was 65 years (range, 34–82 years), and 63.2% of the patients were male. The median interval between tattooing and operation was 1.0 day (range, 0–14 days). Tattoos placed within 2 days of surgery were visualized intraoperatively more frequently than those placed at an earlier date (95% vs. 40%, respectively, P < 0.001). For tattoos placed within 2 days before surgery, the visualization rates by tattoo site were 98.6% (134 of 136) from the ascending colon to the sigmoid colon. The visualization rates at the rectosigmoid colon and rectum were 84% (21 of 25) and 81.3% (13 of 16), respectively (P < 0.001). No complications related to preoperative ICG tattooing occurred.
Conclusion
Endoscopic ICG tattooing is more useful for the preoperative localization of colonic lesions than it is for rectal lesions and should be performed within 2 days before laparoscopic surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Accuracy evaluation of preoperative indocyanine green tattooing and intraoperative colonoscopy in determining surgical resection margins for left-sided colorectal cancer: a retrospective study in Korea
    Byung-Soo Park, Sung Hwan Cho, Gyung Mo Son, Hyun Sung Kim, Jin Ook Jang, Dae Gon Ryu, Su Jin Kim, Su Bum Park, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2025; 28(1): 19.     CrossRef
  • Indocyanine Green Tattooing During Colonoscopy as a Guide to Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Literature Review
    Marzia Varanese, Stefano Arcieri, Augusto Lauro, Cristina Panetta, Chiara Eberspacher, Rossella Palma, Domenico Mascagni, Stefano Pontone
    Surgical Innovation.2024; 31(1): 103.     CrossRef
  • Indocyanine-coated fluorescent clips for localization of gastrointestinal tumors
    Kyonglin Park, Hongrae Kim, Hyoung-Jun Kim, Yongdoo Choi, Sung-Jae Park, Jae-Suk Park, Min-Kyu Choi, Dae Kyung Sohn
    Journal of Innovative Medical Technology.2024; 2(1): 20.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative localization of potentially invisible colonic lesions on the laparoscopic operation field: using autologous blood tattooing
    Ji Yeon Mun, Hyunjoon An, Ri Na Yoo, Hyeon-Min Cho, Bong-Hyeon Kye
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(3): 225.     CrossRef
  • A Green Lantern for the Surgeon: A Review on the Use of Indocyanine Green (ICG) in Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Pietro Fransvea, Michelangelo Miccini, Fabio Rondelli, Giuseppe Brisinda, Alessandro Costa, Giovanni Maria Garbarino, Gianluca Costa
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(16): 4895.     CrossRef
  • Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Guided Surgery in Colorectal Surgery
    Zoe Garoufalia, Steven D. Wexner
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(2): 494.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative tumor marking with indocyanine green (ICG) prior to minimally invasive colorectal cancer: a systematic review of current literature
    Michael K. Konstantinidis, Argyrios Ioannidis, Panteleimon Vassiliu, Nikolaos Arkadopoulos, Ioannis S. Papanikolaou, Konstantinos Stavridis, Gaetano Gallo, Dimitrios Karagiannis, Manish Chand, Steven D. Wexner, Konstantinos Konstantinidis
    Frontiers in Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Assessment of Autologous Blood marker localIzation and intraoperative coLonoscopy localIzation in laparoscopic colorecTal cancer surgery (ABILITY): a randomized controlled trial
    Ke-hui Zhang, Jing-ze Li, Hai-bin Zhang, Ren-hao Hu, Xi-mao Cui, Tao Du, Liang Zheng, Shun Zhang, Chun Song, Mei-dong Xu, Xiao-hua Jiang
    BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Indocyanine Green tattooing for marking the caudal excision margin of a full-thickness vaginal endometriotic nodule
    S Khazali, B Mondelli, K Fleischer, M Adamczyk
    Facts, Views and Vision in ObGyn.2023; 15(1): 89.     CrossRef
  • Indocyanine green dye and its application in gastrointestinal surgery: The future is bright green
    Zavier Yongxuan Lim, Swetha Mohan, Sunder Balasubramaniam, Saleem Ahmed, Caroline Ching Hsia Siew, Vishal G Shelat
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 15(9): 1841.     CrossRef
  • Tumor Segmentation in Colorectal Ultrasound Images Using an Ensemble Transfer Learning Model: Towards Intra-Operative Margin Assessment
    Freija Geldof, Constantijn W. A. Pruijssers, Lynn-Jade S. Jong, Dinusha Veluponnar, Theo J. M. Ruers, Behdad Dashtbozorg
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(23): 3595.     CrossRef
  • Fluorescence Imaging in Colorectal Surgery: An Updated Review and Future Trends
    Paulina Daniluk, Natalia Mazur, Maciej Swierblewski, Manish Chand, Michele Diana, Karol Polom
    Surgical Innovation.2022; 29(4): 479.     CrossRef
  • Promising Novel Technique for Tumor Localization in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Using Indocyanine Green-Coated Endoscopic Clips
    Dong Woon Lee, Dae Kyung Sohn, Kyung Su Han, Chang Won Hong, Hyoung Chul Park, Jae Hwan Oh
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2021; 64(1): e9.     CrossRef
  • Digital dynamic discrimination of primary colorectal cancer using systemic indocyanine green with near-infrared endoscopy
    Jeffrey Dalli, Eamon Loughman, Niall Hardy, Anwesha Sarkar, Mohammad Faraz Khan, Haseeb A. Khokhar, Paul Huxel, Donal F. O’Shea, Ronan A. Cahill
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic Preoperative Tattooing and Marking in the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Systematic Review of Alternative Methods
    Manuel Barberio, Margherita Pizzicannella, Giovanni Guglielmo Laracca, Mahdi Al-Taher, Andrea Spota, Jacques Marescaux, Eric Felli, Michele Diana
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2020; 30(9): 953.     CrossRef
  • The Usefulness of Preoperative Colonoscopic Tattooing with Autologous Blood for Localization in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
    Ui Do Yeo, Nak Song Sung, Seung Jae Roh, Won Jun Choi, Kyung Ho Song, In Seok Choi, Dae Sung Yoon, Sang Eok Lee, Ju Ik Moon, Seong Uk Kwon, In Eui Bae, Seung Jae Lee
    The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2020; 23(3): 114.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Colonoscopic Tattooing Using a Direct Injection Method with Indocyanine Green for Localization of Colorectal Tumors: An Efficacy and Safety Comparison Study
    Young Jin Kim, Ji Won Park, Han-Ki Lim, Yoon-Hye Kwon, Min Jung Kim, Eun Kyung Choe, Sang Hui Moon, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park
    The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2020; 23(4): 186.     CrossRef
  • Robotic excision of a colonic neoplasm with ICG as a tumor localizer and colonoscopic assistance
    S. Atallah, A. Oldham, A. Kondek, S. Larach
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2019; 23(6): 573.     CrossRef
Editorials
Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery After Chemoradiotherapy: Widening Scope of Indications for Local Excision
Min Jung Kim, Jae Hwan Oh
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(2):43-43.   Published online April 28, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.2.43
  • 3,121 View
  • 30 Download
PDF
Exposure to Cigarette Smoke Contributes to the Risk of Developing a Colorectal Adenoma, Doesn't It? Are Repeated Exposures to Such Smoke Dangerous?
Bong Hwa Lee, Min Jung Kim, Hyoung Chul Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(2):43-44.   Published online April 30, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.2.43
  • 3,227 View
  • 24 Download
PDF
Functional New Sphincter Ani Reconstruction by Using Neurovascualr Antropylorus Transposition After an Anorectal Excision
Bong Hwa Lee, Min Jung Kim, Hyoung Chul Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(1):5-6.   Published online February 28, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.1.5
  • 2,791 View
  • 27 Download
PDF
Original Article
Analysis of Risk Factors for the Development of Incisional and Parastomal Hernias in Patients after Colorectal Surgery
In Ho Song, Heon-Kyun Ha, Sang-Gi Choi, Byeong Geon Jeon, Min Jung Kim, Kyu Joo Park
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(6):299-303.   Published online December 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.6.299
  • 5,221 View
  • 46 Download
  • 29 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the overall rate and risk factors for the development of an incisional hernia and a parastomal hernia after colorectal surgery.

Methods

The study cohort consisted of 795 consecutive patients who underwent open colorectal surgery between 2005 and 2007 by a single surgeon. A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data was performed.

Results

The overall incidence of incisional hernias was 2% (14/690). This study revealed that the cumulative incidences of incisional hernia were 1% at 12 months and 3% after 36 months. Eighty-six percent of all incisional hernias developed within 3 years after a colectomy. The overall rate of parastomal hernias in patients with a stoma was 6.7% (7/105). The incidence of parastomal hernias was significantly higher in the colostomy group than in the ileostomy group (11.9% vs. 0%; P = 0.007). Obesity, abdominal aortic aneurysm, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, serum albumin level, emergency surgery and postoperative ileus did not influence the incidence of incisional or parastomal hernias. However, the multivariate analysis revealed that female gender and wound infection were significant risk factors for the development of incisional hernias female: P = 0.009, wound infection: P = 0.041). There were no significant factors related to the development of parastomal hernias.

Conclusion

Our results indicate that most incisional hernias develop within 3 years after a colectomy. Female gender and wound infection were risk factors for the development of an incisional hernia after colorectal surgery. In contrast, no significant factors were found to be associated with the development of a parastomal hernia.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Propensity Score Analysis of the Utility of Supervised Perioperative Abdominal Wall Exercises for the Prevention of Parastomal Hernia
    Victoria Alejandra López-Callejón, Amparo Yuste-Sanchez, Mayed Murad, Rut Navarro-Martínez, Leticia Pérez-Santiago, José Martín-Arevalo, David Moro-Valdezate, Vicente Pla-Martí, David Casado-Rodriguez, Alejandro Espí-Macías, Stephanie García-Botello
    Nursing Reports.2025; 15(2): 62.     CrossRef
  • Comparing Surgical Site Infection Rate Between Primary Closure and Rhomboid Flap After Stoma Reversal
    Che-Ming Chu, Chih-Cheng Chen, Yu-Yao Chang, Kai-Jyun Syu, Shih-Lung Lin
    Annals of Plastic Surgery.2024; 92(1S): S33.     CrossRef
  • Significance of Specimen Extraction Site in Minimizing Hernia Risk After Distal Pancreatectomy
    Pranay S. Ajay, Hardik U. Shah, Sameer Sandhu, Caitlin P. Sok, Parit T. Mavani, Subir Goyal, Maria C. Russell, Kenneth Cardona, Felipe B. Maegawa, Shishir K. Maithel, Juan M. Sarmiento, David A. Kooby, Mihir M. Shah
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(13): 8688.     CrossRef
  • Incidence of incisional hernia after major colorectal cancer surgery & analysis of associated risk factors in Asian population: Is laparoscopy any better?
    Shao Nan Khor, S.H.X. Cheok, Rehena Sultana, Emile Kwong Wei Tan
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2023; 46(1): 99.     CrossRef
  • Caracterización de un grupo de pacientes sometidos a herniorrafia lateral con malla retromuscular en un centro de tercer nivel de 2015 a 2019
    Carlos Andrés Calle-Lotero, Camila Arias-González, Juliana Mesa-Arango, Estefanía Muñoz-Cuartas, Faber Alveiro Machado-Rivera
    Revista Colombiana de Cirugía.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of Obesity Classification on Complications after Sigmoidostomy for Low-Grade Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    慧 王
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2023; 13(07): 11825.     CrossRef
  • Midline incision vs. transverse incision for specimen extraction is not a significant risk factor for developing incisional hernia after minimally invasive colorectal surgery: multivariable analysis of a large cohort from a single tertiary center in Korea
    Hong Bae Choi, Dabin Chung, Ji-Seon Kim, Tae-Hoon Lee, Se-Jin Baek, Jung-Myun Kwak, Jin Kim, Seon-Hahn Kim
    Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(2): 1199.     CrossRef
  • Stoma creation is associated with a low incidence of midline incisional hernia after colorectal surgery: the “fighting over the fascia” theory concerning the incision and stoma hole
    Noriaki Ohara, Kay Uehara, Atsushi Ogura, Masanori Sando, Toshisada Aiba, Yuki Murata, Takashi Mizuno, Kokuryo Toshio, Yukihiro Yokoyama, Satoko Ishigaki, Yuanying Li, Hiroshi Yatsuya, Tomoki Ebata
    Surgery Today.2022; 52(6): 953.     CrossRef
  • Collagen Analysis in Incisional Hernias
    Asha Jose V.
    Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences.2022; 11(2): 335.     CrossRef
  • Impact of a Dual-Ring Wound Protector on Outcome After Elective Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
    Chin-Fan Chen, Hsiang-Lin Tsai, Ching-Wen Huang, Yung-Sung Yeh, Cheng-Jen Ma, Tsung-Kun Chang, Wei-Chih Su, Jaw-Yuan Wang
    Journal of Surgical Research.2019; 244: 136.     CrossRef
  • Incidence of Clinically Relevant Incisional Hernia After Colon Cancer Surgery and Its Risk Factors: A Nationwide Claims Study
    Gi Hyeon Seo, Eun Kyung Choe, Kyu Joo Park, Young Jun Chai
    World Journal of Surgery.2018; 42(4): 1192.     CrossRef
  • Incidence and Factors Correlating With Incisional Hernia Following Open Bowel Resection in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
    Tomas M. Heimann, Santosh Swaminathan, Adrian J. Greenstein, Randolph M. Steinhagen
    Annals of Surgery.2018; 267(3): 532.     CrossRef
  • Extraperitoneal sigmoidostomy: a surgical approach with less complications and better functions for abdominoperineal resection of rectal cancer
    Peng Wang, Jianwei Liang, Haitao Zhou, Zheng Wang, Lei Shi, Zhixiang Zhou
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2018; 33(1): 41.     CrossRef
  • Preventive endoprosthetic replacement of the abdominal wall after midline laparotomy
    N. A. Kulikova
    Operativnaya khirurgiya i klinicheskaya anatomiya (Pirogovskii nauchnyi zhurnal).2018; 2(3): 38.     CrossRef
  • Discovery of novel plasma proteins as biomarkers for the development of incisional hernias after midline incision in patients with colorectal cancer: The ColoCare study
    Jürgen Böhm, Frank Pianka, Nina Stüttgen, Junghyun Rho, Biljana Gigic, Yuzheng Zhang, Nina Habermann, Petra Schrotz-King, Clare Abbenhardt-Martin, Lin Zielske, Paul D. Lampe, Alexis Ulrich, Markus K. Diener, Cornelia M. Ulrich
    Surgery.2017; 161(3): 808.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative abdominal hernia: a modern view on incidence and etiopathogenesis
    A. S. Ermolov, V. T. Koroshvili, D. A. Blagovestnov, P. A. Yartsev, I. A. Shlyakhovsky
    Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2017; (5): 76.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors of severe incisional hernia after renal transplantation: a retrospective multicentric case–control study on 225 patients
    E. Broggi, F. Bruyère, F. Gaudez, F. Desgrandchamps
    World Journal of Urology.2017; 35(7): 1111.     CrossRef
  • Assessing the predictive accuracy of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Project Surgical Risk Calculator in open ventral hernia repair
    Marten N. Basta, Andrew R. Bauder, Stephen J. Kovach, John P. Fischer
    The American Journal of Surgery.2016; 212(2): 272.     CrossRef
  • Prevention of postoperative ventral hernias: current state of the art
    B. S. Sukhovatykh, N. M. Valuyskaya, N. V. Pravednikova, E. V. Gerasimchuk, T. V. Mutova
    Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2016; (3): 76.     CrossRef
  • Collagenopathies—Implications for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction: A Systematic Review
    Bridget Harrison, Kyle Sanniec, Jeffrey E. Janis
    Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open.2016; 4(10): e1036.     CrossRef
  • The state of midline closure of the abdominal wall
    A H Petter-Puchner
    British Journal of Surgery.2015; 102(12): 1446.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic ventral/incisional hernia repair: updated guidelines from the EAES and EHS endorsed Consensus Development Conference
    Gianfranco Silecchia, Fabio Cesare Campanile, Luis Sanchez, Graziano Ceccarelli, Armando Antinori, Luca Ansaloni, Stefano Olmi, Giovanni Carlo Ferrari, Diego Cuccurullo, Paolo Baccari, Ferdinando Agresta, Nereo Vettoretto, Micaela Piccoli
    Surgical Endoscopy.2015; 29(9): 2463.     CrossRef
  • Mesh herniorrhaphy with simultaneous colorectal surgery: a case-matched study from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
    Cigdem Benlice, Emre Gorgun, Erman Aytac, Gokhan Ozuner, Feza H. Remzi
    The American Journal of Surgery.2015; 210(4): 766.     CrossRef
  • A review of the incidence of iatrogenic hernia in both laparoscopic and open colorectal surgery: Using CT as the gold standard of detection, cohort study
    Nader Naguib, Henna Rafique, Pawan Kumar Dhruva Rao, Tomos Longworth, Jean Mark Soukias, Ashraf Masoud
    International Journal of Surgery.2015; 19: 87.     CrossRef
  • Incidence and Risk Factors of Parastomal Hernia in Patients Undergoing Radical Cystectomy and Ileal Conduit Diversion
    Nick W. Liu, Jeromy T. Hackney, Paul T. Gellhaus, M. Francesca Monn, Timothy A. Masterson, Richard Bihrle, Thomas A. Gardner, Michael G. House, Michael O. Koch
    Journal of Urology.2014; 191(5): 1313.     CrossRef
  • Incidence of and risk factors for incisional hernia after abdominal surgery
    K Itatsu, Y Yokoyama, G Sugawara, H Kubota, Y Tojima, Y Kurumiya, H Kono, H Yamamoto, M Ando, M Nagino
    British Journal of Surgery.2014; 101(11): 1439.     CrossRef
  • Prophylactic synthetic mesh can be safely used to close emergency laparotomies, even in peritonitis
    Nuria Argudo, José A. Pereira, Juan J. Sancho, Estela Membrilla, M. José Pons, Luis Grande
    Surgery.2014; 156(5): 1238.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors for the Development of Parastomal Hernia after Radical Cystectomy
    Timothy F. Donahue, Bernard H. Bochner, John P. Sfakianos, Matthew Kent, Melanie Bernstein, William M. Hilton, Eugene K. Cha, Alyssa M. Yee, Guido Dalbagni, Hebert A. Vargas
    Journal of Urology.2014; 191(6): 1708.     CrossRef
  • Increased Risk of Incisional Hernia after Sigmoid Colectomy for Diverticulitis Compared with Colon Cancer
    Javier S. Pogacnik, Evangelos Messaris, Susan M. Deiling, Tara M. Connelly, Arthur S. Berg, David B. Stewart, Kevin J. McKenna, Lisa S. Poritz, Walter A. Koltun
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2014; 218(5): 920.     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP