Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
5 "Mohammad Yasin Karami"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Display
Original Articles
Comparison of Limberg Flap and Karydakis Flap Surgery for the Treatment of Patients With Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Single-Blinded Parallel Randomized Study
Mina Alvandipour, Mohammad Sadegh Zamani, Mojtaba Ghorbani, Jamshid Yazdani Charati, Mohammad Yasin Karami
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(6):313-318.   Published online May 22, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.09.27
  • 18,569 View
  • 267 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 24 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Pilonidal sinus disease is a common condition, which mostly affects young men. While various surgical techniques have been introduced for treating intergluteal pilonidal disease (IPD), controversies still exist regarding the best surgical approach. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficiency and the short-term outcomes of Limberg flap and Karydakis flap surgeries for the treatments of patients with IPD.
Methods
A total of 80 patients with IPD who had underwent either Karydakis flap (KF group: n = 37) or Limberg flap (LF group: n = 27) surgery between January 2015 and January 2016 at Imam Khomeini Hospital of Sari in the North of Iran were recruited for inclusion in this randomized, single-blind study.
Results
Compared to the KF group, the LF group showed faster complete wound healing, longer duration of surgery and hospital stay, larger wound size, and shorter period of incapacity for work. The overall patient satisfaction in the LF group was significantly higher than that in the KF group. The visual analogue scale score of pain was lower in the LF group than in the KF group. Also, the overall frequency of postoperative complications was higher in the KF group than in the LF group. Recurrence was reported in one patient from the KF group.
Conclusion
Given the lower rate of postoperative complications and greater cosmetic satisfaction of patients, the Limberg flap procedure should be selected, instead of the Karydakis flap procedure, as the standard technique for treating patients with IPD.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Short-term results of unroofing and marsupialization compared to the Karydakis technique in the treatment of pilonidal sinus. A randomized prospective study
    Pedro Antonio Parra Baños, Nuria Martínez Sanz, Francisco Miguel González Valverde, Jorge Alejandro Benavides Buleje, Miguel Ruiz Marín, Emilio Peña Ros, Carmen Martínez Sanz, Mari Fe Candel Arenas
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2025; 103(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Resultados a corto plazo de la puesta a plano, curetaje y marsupialización frente a la técnica de Karydakis en el tratamiento del seno pilonidal. Estudio prospectivo aleatorizado
    Pedro Antonio Parra Baños, Nuria Martínez Sanz, Francisco Miguel González Valverde, Jorge Alejandro Benavides Buleje, Miguel Ruiz Marín, Emilio Peña Ros, Carmen Martínez Sanz, Mari Fe Candel Arenas
    Cirugía Española.2025; 103(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Langzeitergebnisse einer Pilotstudie über das zweizeitige Verfahren mit primärer Exzision und Limberg-Plastik im Intervall zur Therapie einer sakrokokzygealen Pilonidalsinuserkrankung
    Michael Ardelt, Falk Rauchfuss, Felix Dondorf, Aladdin Ali Deeb, Astrid Bauschke, Oliver Rohland, Laura Schwenk, Utz Settmacher
    Die Chirurgie.2025; 96(8): 667.     CrossRef
  • Outcome After Surgical Treatment for Chronic Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Systematic Review of Common Surgical Techniques
    Ida-Marie Myron Wiinblad, Johan Ulrichsen, Birgitte Brandstrup
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2025; 68(5): 515.     CrossRef
  • Midline and off-midline wound closure methods after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus
    Zhaolun Cai, Zhou Zhao, Qin Ma, Chaoyong Shen, Zhiyuan Jiang, Chunyu Liu, Chunjuan Liu, Bo Zhang
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A new method for wound defect closure after pilonidal sinus excision
    E. N. Shubrov, A G. Baryshev, K. V. Triandafilov
    Koloproktologia.2024; 23(1): 129.     CrossRef
  • The application of ERAS in pilonidal sinus: comparison of postoperative recovery between primary suture and Limberg flap procedure in a multicenter prospective randomized trial
    Wei Lu, Shujuan Huang, Hui Ye, Shang Xiang, Xiangsheng Zeng
    Frontiers in Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Management and outcomes of pilonidal patients with secondary sinuses—a cohort study
    Norah E. Liang, Claire Abrajano, Kyla Santos Dalusag, Bill Chiu
    Pediatric Surgery International.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dutch national guideline on the management of intergluteal pilonidal sinus disease
    Eleonora A Huurman, Christel A L de Raaff, Pim C E J Sloots, Oren Lapid, Hessel H van der Zee, Wilfred Bötger, Sandra Janssen, Francine Das, Andrea L J Kortlever-van der Spek, Anja van der Hout, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Boudewijn R Toorenvliet, Robert M Smeenk
    British Journal of Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Outcome between Limberg Flap and Karydakis Flap in Pilonidal Sinus Disease
    Madeeha Shahid, Muhammad Khalid, Nazia Qamar, Salman Zafar, Sadia Sundus, Abdul Rehman
    Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences.2024; : 174.     CrossRef
  • The application of the Limberg flap repair technique in the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease
    Yaoyao Song, Yu Zang, Zequn Chen, Jianjun Li, Minhui Zhu, Hongjuan Zhu, Wanli Chu, Gang Liu, Chuan'an Shen
    International Wound Journal.2023; 20(6): 2241.     CrossRef
  • Management of Pilonidal Disease
    Lindsay A. Gil, Katherine J. Deans, Peter C. Minneci
    JAMA Surgery.2023; 158(8): 875.     CrossRef
  • Bilaterally parallel elliptic flap versus Karydakis flap in primary pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled trial
    Umut Fırat Turan, Serdar Coban, Tezcan Akin, Huseyin Berkem, Bulent Cavit Yuksel, Sadettin Er
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of single center clinical experience in patients undergoing modified Limberg flap technique in pilonidal sinus disease
    Burak UÇANER, Şebnem ÇİMEN, Mehmet Zeki BULDANLI
    Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care.2023; 4(6): 694.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Study on Short-Term Outcome in Patients Undergoing Pilonidal Sinus Surgery in Tertiary Care
    Dakshay A. Chordia, A. P. Prem, Jameel Akhter, M. Muralidharan, A. Sathishkumar
    Indian Journal of Colo-Rectal Surgery.2023; 6(1): 4.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of the Outcomes of a New Method for Plastic Surgery for Postoperative Wound Of Sacrococcygeal Region after Excision of the Pilonidal Cyst: Randomized Trial.
    E. N. Shubrov, A. G. Baryshev, K. V. Triandafilov, V. A. Aladina, V. V. Fedyushkin, R. K. Amirova
    Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin.2022; 29(5): 80.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness and Feasibility of Limberg and Karydakis Flap in Recurrent and Complicated Pilonidal Sinus Disease
    Amr Abdel Hameed Elhiny, Doaa Ali Saad, Mohamed Sadek Farahat
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2021; 83(1): 55.     CrossRef
  • S3-Leitlinie: Sinus pilonidalis. 2. revidierte Fassung 2020
    A. Ommer, I. Iesalnieks, D. Doll
    coloproctology.2021; 43(S1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Pilonoidal Sinüs Tedavisinde Modifiye Limberg Flep Uygulaması Sonuçları
    Nizamettin KUTLUER, Nurullah AKSOY
    Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi.2021; 16(1): 68.     CrossRef
  • Pilonidal Sinus Disease: An Analysis of the Factors Affecting Recurrence
    Murat Kanlioz, Uğur Ekici, Faik Tatli, Turgay Karatas
    Advances in Skin & Wound Care.2021; 34(2): 81.     CrossRef
  • Karydakis procedure versus Limberg flap for treatment of pilonidal sinus: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sameh Hany Emile, Sualeh Muslim Khan, Samer Hani Barsom, Steven D Wexner
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(7): 1421.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of comma-shaped incision with a sacral flap in surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus
    MinaR.A.R. El Nahal, MohammedY.F. Aly, RagaiS Hanna, GamalA Makhlouf, GamalA Hameed Ahmed
    Journal of Current Medical Research and Practice.2020; 5(1): 46.     CrossRef
  • Surgical procedures in the pilonidal sinus disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Siwei Bi, Kaibo Sun, Shanshan Chen, Jun Gu
    Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An effective minimal invasive method in pilonidal sinus surgery: Sinusotomy
    Önder KARABAY
    Archives of Clinical and Experimental Medicine.2019; 4(3): 138.     CrossRef
Which One is Better? Comparison of the Acute Inflammatory Response, Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis and Alvarado Scoring Systems
Mohammad Yasin Karami, Hadi Niakan, Navid Zadebagheri, Parviz Mardani, Zahra Shayan, Iman Deilami
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(6):227-231.   Published online December 31, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.6.227
  • 8,813 View
  • 133 Download
  • 27 Web of Science
  • 25 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Acute appendicitis (AA) is one of the most common causes of an acute abdomen. The accuracies of the Alvarado and the acute inflammatory response (AIR) scores in the diagnosis of appendicitis is very low in Asian populations, so a new scoring system, the Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis (RIPASA) system, was designed recently. We applied and compared the Alvarado, AIR, and RIPASA scores in the diagnoses of appendicitis in the Iranian population.

Methods

We prospectively compared the RIPASA, Alvarado, and AIR systems by applying them to 100 patients. All the scores were calculated for patients who presented with right quadrant pain. Appendectomies were performed; then, the postoperative pathology reports were correlated with the scores. Scores of 8, 7, and 5 or more are optimal cutoffs for the RIPASA, Alvarado, and AIR scoring systems, respectively. The sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values, negative predictive values (NPVs), positive and negative likelihood ratios (LRs) for the 3 systems were determined.

Results

The sensitivity and the specificity of the RIPASA score were 93.18% and 91.67%, respectively. The sensitivities of the Alvarado and the AIR scores were both 78.41%. The specificities of the Alvarado and the AIR scores were 100% and 91.67%, respectively. The RIPASA score correctly classified 93% of all patients confirmed with histological AA compared with 78.41% for the Alvarado and the AIR scores.

Conclusion

The RIPASA scoring system had more sensitivity, better NPV, a positive LR, and a less negative LR for the Iranian population whereas the Alvarado scoring system was more specific.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical scores for acute appendicitis in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies
    Luis Adrian Alvarez-Lozada, Bernardo Alfonso Fernandez-Reyes, Francisco Javier Arrambide-Garza, Mariana García-Leal, Neri Alejandro Alvarez-Villalobos, Javier Humberto Martínez-Garza, Bernardo Fernández-Rodarte, Rodrigo E. Elizondo-Omaña, Alejandro Quirog
    The American Journal of Surgery.2025; 240: 116123.     CrossRef
  • 31/w mit Mittelbauchschmerzen und einmaligem Erbrechen
    Dorothea Sauer
    Notfall + Rettungsmedizin.2025; 28(S2): 107.     CrossRef
  • How successful are Alvarado and air scores in excluding gynecopathologies?
    Goksever Akpinar, Batuhan Eyduran, Alaattin Karabulut, Baris Eker
    Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluating the Diagnostic Accuracy of the Alvarado Score and Abdominal Ultrasound for Acute Appendicitis: A Retrospective Single-Center Study
    Saleh Al-wageeh, Qasem Alyhari, Faisal Ahmed, Abdulfattah Altam, Gubran Alshehari, Mohamed Badheeb
    Open Access Emergency Medicine.2024; Volume 16: 159.     CrossRef
  • EVALUATION OF ALVARADO SCORE IN DIAGNOSIS OF ACUTE APPENDICITIS
    Sumia Dra
    Libyan Journal of Medical Research.2024; 18(1): 172.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Alvarado score, appendicitis inflammatory response score (AIR) and Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha appendicitis (RIPASA) score in predicting acute appendicitis
    Muhammad Zeb, Sabir Khan Khattak, Maryam Samad, Syed Shayan Shah, Syed Qasim Ali Shah, Abdul Haseeb
    Heliyon.2023; 9(1): e13013.     CrossRef
  • A systematic review and meta-regression for validation of the Alvarado score as a tool for predicting acute appendicitis
    Sapna Gupta, Venkata S. Kolli, Kimberly Da Costa, Sariya Javed, Ahmed Ammar, Ashraf Rasheed
    Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2023; 85(2): 111.     CrossRef
  • Modificación de la efectividad diagnóstica de la escala RIPASA en pacientes con apendicitis aguda y consumo de analgésicos no esteroideos
    Pedro Josué Araujo Ramírez, Ricardo Sanabria Trujillo, Sergio Hernández Aguilar, Francisco Javier Hernández Hernández
    Acta Médica Grupo Ángeles.2023; 21(2): 123.     CrossRef
  • Performance and diagnostic accuracy of scoring systems in adult patients with suspected appendicitis
    David Eng Yeow Gan, Nik Ritza Kosai Nik Mahmood, Jitt Aun Chuah, Firdaus Hayati
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of RIPASA and ALVARADO scores for risk assessment of acute appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Giuliana Favara, Andrea Maugeri, Martina Barchitta, Andrea Ventura, Guido Basile, Antonella Agodi, Ibrahim Umar Garzali
    PLOS ONE.2022; 17(9): e0275427.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Accuracy Rates of Appendicitis Scoring Systems for the Stratified Age Groups
    Emre Gonullu, Zulfu Bayhan, Recayi Capoglu, Barış Mantoglu, Burak Kamburoglu, Tarık Harmantepe, Fatih Altıntoprak, Unal Erkorkmaz, Roberto Cirocchi
    Emergency Medicine International.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Serum Bilirubin as a Predictor of Complications of Acute Appendicitis in Adults
    K P C Muhammed Irfan, C Rajeev, A Mohamad Safwan, Shafy Ali Khan, K N Vijayan, Liju Varghese
    Kerala Surgical Journal.2022; 28(2): 182.     CrossRef
  • Consensus Statement of the Italian Polispecialistic Society of Young Surgeons (SPIGC): Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Appendicitis
    Eleonora Guaitoli, Gaetano Gallo, Eleonora Cardone, Luigi Conti, Simone Famularo, Giampaolo Formisano, Federica Galli, Giuseppe Giuliani, Antonio Martino, Alessandro Pasculli, Romeo Patini, Domenico Soriero, Vincenzo Pappalardo, Gianmaria Casoni Pattacini
    Journal of Investigative Surgery.2021; 34(10): 1089.     CrossRef
  • Validation of the Appendicitis Inflammatory Response (AIR) Score
    Manne Andersson, Blanka Kolodziej, Roland E. Andersson
    World Journal of Surgery.2021; 45(7): 2081.     CrossRef
  • Acute inflammatory response and Alvarado scoring systems in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: which one is more accurate?
    Abdoulhossein Davoodabadi, Hassan Zandi, Alireza Moravveji, Mohammad J. Azadchehr
    Chirurgia.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic accuracy of Alvarado, RIPASA and Tzanakis scoring system in acute appendicitis: A prospective observational study
    Pushkar Sharma, Ankit Jain, Gomathi Shankar, Sreerekha Jinkala, Uday S Kumbhar, Sreenath G Shamanna
    Tropical Doctor.2021; 51(4): 475.     CrossRef
  • Acute appendicitis–advances and controversies
    Thomas Zheng Jie Teng, Xuan Rong Thong, Kai Yuan Lau, Sunder Balasubramaniam, Vishal G Shelat
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2021; 13(11): 1293.     CrossRef
  • RIPASA versus Alvarado score in the assessment of suspected appendicitis in children: a prospective study
    Tülin Öztaş, Muhammet Asena
    Annals of Pediatric Surgery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predictive value of scoring systems for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in emergency department patients: Is there an accurate one?
    Rohat Ak, Fatih Doğanay, Ebru Unal Akoğlu, Haldun Akoğlu, Aslı Bahar Uçar, Erdem Kurt, Cansu Arslan Turan, Ozge Onur
    Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine.2020; 27(5): 262.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Raja Isteri Pengiran Anak Saleha Appendicitis and modified Alvarado scoring systems in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis
    Nurullah Damburacı, Barış Sevinç, Murat Güner, Ömer Karahan
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2020; 90(4): 521.     CrossRef
  • Empfehlungen zur Therapie der akuten Appendizitis
    M. Andric, J. C. Kalff, W. Schwenk, S. Farkas, W. Hartwig, A. Türler, R. Croner
    Der Chirurg.2020; 91(9): 700.     CrossRef
  • COMPARİSON OF ALVARADO AND RIPASA SCORES İN PATİENTS WİTH ACUTE APPENDİCİTİS
    Mine ESMER GÖKÇE, İ̇lhan KORKMAZ, Yusuf TEKİN, Sefa YURTBAY, Erdal DEMİRTAŞ, Orhan ÖZSOY, Sedat ÖZBAY, Fatma KUKUL GÜVEN
    Cumhuriyet Medical Journal.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predictive Value of Alvarado, Acute Inflammatory Response, Tzanakis and RIPASA Scores in the Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis
    Senol Tahir, Andrej Nikolovski, Martina Ambardjieva, Petar Markov, Dragoslav Mladenovik, Gjulsen Selim, Beti Zafirova-Ivanovska, Vlado Janevski
    Lietuvos chirurgija.2020; 19(3-4): 109.     CrossRef
  • Scoring Systems in Acute Appendicitis - A Review
    Aditya Vijay Mundada, Yeshwant Lamture, Meenakshi Yeola
    Journal of Evolution of Medical and Dental Sciences.2020; 9(51): 3881.     CrossRef
  • Can RIPASA Scoring System Predict the Pathological Stage of Acute Appendicitis?
    Banu Karapolat
    Emergency Medicine International.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
Purse-String Versus Linear Conventional Skin Wound Closure of an Ileostomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Mina Alvandipour, Babak Gharedaghi, Hamed Khodabakhsh, Mohammad Yasin Karami
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(4):144-149.   Published online August 31, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.4.144
  • 7,770 View
  • 87 Download
  • 20 Web of Science
  • 23 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Infection is one of the most frequent complications that can occur after ileostomy closure. The incidence of wound infection depends on the skin closure technique, but there is no agreement on the perfect closure method for an ileostomy wound. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of infection, the patient's approval, and the patient's pain between purse-string closure (PSC) and the usual linear closure (LC) of a stoma wound.

Methods

This randomized clinical trial enrolled 66 patients who underwent a stoma closure from February 2015 to May 2015 in Sari Emam Khomeini Hospital. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the stoma closing method: the PSC group (n = 34) and the LC group (n = 32). The incidences of infection for the 2 groups were compared, and the patients' satisfaction and pain with the stoma were determined by using a questionnaire.

Results

Infection occurred in 1 of 34 PSC patients (2.9%) and in 7 of 32 LC patients (21.8%), and this difference was statistically significant (P = 0.021). Patients in the PSC group were more satisfied with the resulting wound scar and its cosmetic appearance at one month and three months after surgery (P = 0.043).

Conclusion

After stoma closure, PSC was associated with a significantly lower incidence of wound infection and greater patient satisfaction compared to LC. However, the healing period for patients who underwent PSC was longer than it was for those who underwent LC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Mechanically powered negative pressure dressing reduces surgical site infection after stoma reversal
    Brian Williams, Aubrey Swinford, Jordan Martucci, Johnny Wang, Jordan R. Wlodarczyk, Abhinav Gupta, Kyle G. Cologne, Sarah E. Koller, Christine Hsieh, Marjun P. Duldulao, Joongho Shin
    Surgery Open Science.2025; 23: 69.     CrossRef
  • Usefulness of a negative pressure wound therapy system for stoma closure
    Chisato Shirakawa, Yuzuru Sakamoto, Shinya Ueki, Hiroki Shomura, Keizo Kazui, Akinobu Taketomi
    Journal of Wound Care.2025; 34(2): 106.     CrossRef
  • Circular (purse-string) vs primary skin closure following stoma closure: an up-to-date systematic review and meta-analysis
    F. Menegon Tasselli, F. Pata, G. Fuschillo, G. Signoriello, A. Bondurri, G. Sciaudone, F. Selvaggi, G. Pellino
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Primary closure of ileostomy site after irrigation with betaine–polyhexanide: a case series
    Henry Krasner, Abigail W Cheng, Lance Horner, Ovunc Bardakcioglu
    Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Outcome of Purse-string Versus Conventional Wound Closure Techniques in Patients Undergoing Stoma Reversal: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Assad Ameer, Muhammad Bilal Mirza, Nabila Talat
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery.2024; 59(6): 1186.     CrossRef
  • Purse-string skin closure versus linear skin closure in people undergoing stoma reversal
    Shahab Hajibandeh, Shahin Hajibandeh, Andrew Maw
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of purse-string technique vs linear suture for skin closure after ileostomy reversal. A randomized controlled trial
    Filippo Carannante, Gianluca Costa, Valentina Miacci, Gianfranco Bianco, Gianluca Masciana, Sara Lauricella, Marco Caricato, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Purse-string versus linear closure of the skin wound following stoma reversal: A meta-analysis with RCT and systematic review
    Jinlong Luo, Dan Liu, Junmei Wu, Huaiwu Jiang, Jin Chen, Hua Yang, Lie Yang
    Medicine.2024; 103(35): e39477.     CrossRef
  • Short-term outcomes following purse-string versus conventional closure of ileostomy wounds in Chinese colorectal cancer patients — a single center retrospective study
    Yu-Rong Jiao, Xin-Bin Zhou, Yao Ye, Qian Xiao, Xiang-Xing Kong, Ke-Feng Ding, Jun Li
    Holistic Integrative Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Results of application of the technique of the extraperitoneal closure of loop intestinal stoma
    N. A. Maistrenko, A. A. Sazonov, P. N. Romashchenko, M. V. Zotov
    Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery.2023; 181(6): 64.     CrossRef
  • Wound Infection After Ileostomy Closure: An Interim Analysis of a Prospective Randomized Study Comparing Primary Versus Circumferential Subcuticular Closure Techniques
    Sumesh Kaistha, Rajesh Panwar, Sujoy Pal, Nihar Ranjan Dash, Peush Sahni, Tushar Kanti Chattopadhyay
    Surgical Infections.2023; 24(9): 797.     CrossRef
  • Purse-string skin closure versus linear skin closure in people undergoing stoma reversal
    Shahab Hajibandeh, Shahin Hajibandeh, Andrew Maw
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • COMPARISON BETWEEN OSTOMY CLOSURE USING PURSE-STRING VERSUS LINEAR IN CHILDREN
    Shahnam Askarpour, Mehran Peyvasteh, Farbod Farhadi, Hazhir Javaherizadeh
    ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo).2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Negative-pressure wound therapy after stoma reversal in colorectal surgery: a randomized controlled trial
    Francesco M Carrano, Annalisa Maroli, Michele Carvello, Caterina Foppa, Matteo Sacchi, Jacopo Crippa, Giuseppe Clerico, Francesca De Lucia, Elisabetta Coppola, Nadav Ben David, Antonino Spinelli
    BJS Open.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evidence-based adoption of purse-string skin closure for stoma wounds
    Nilotpal Behuria, Jayant Kumar Banerjee, Sita Ram Ghosh, Shrirang Vasant Kulkarni, Ramanathan Saranga Bharathi
    Medical Journal Armed Forces India.2020; 76(2): 185.     CrossRef
  • Gunsight Procedure Versus the Purse-String Procedure for Closing Wounds After Stoma Reversal: A Multicenter Prospective Randomized Trial
    Jia Gang Han, Hong Wei Yao, Jian Ping Zhou, Hong Zhang, Gui Ying Wang, Zhan Long Shen, Jian Feng Gong, Zhen Jun Wang
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2020; 63(10): 1411.     CrossRef
  • Quality of life following ostomy reversal with purse-string vs linear skin closure: a systematic review
    Emanuele Rausa, M. E. Kelly, G. Sgroi, V. Lazzari, A. Aiolfi, F. Cavalcoli, G. Bonitta, L. Bonavina
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2019; 34(2): 209.     CrossRef
  • Purse-string vs. linear skin closure at loop ileostomy reversal: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    M. Gachabayov, H. Lee, A. Chudner, A. Dyatlov, N. Zhang, R. Bergamaschi
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2019; 23(3): 207.     CrossRef
  • Italian guidelines for the surgical management of enteral stomas in adults
    F. Ferrara, D. Parini, A. Bondurri, M. Veltri, M. Barbierato, F. Pata, F. Cattaneo, A. Tafuri, C. Forni, G. Roveron, G. Rizzo
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2019; 23(11): 1037.     CrossRef
  • Purse-string closure versus conventional primary closure of wound following stoma reversal: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Fabio Rondelli, Laura Franco, Ruben Carlo Balzarotti Canger, Graziano Ceccarelli, Cecilia Becattini, Walter Bugiantella
    International Journal of Surgery.2018; 52: 208.     CrossRef
  • Purse-string skin closure versus linear skin closure techniques in stoma closure: a comprehensive meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of randomised trials
    Shahab Hajibandeh, Shahin Hajibandeh, Andrew Kennedy-Dalby, Sheik Rehman, Reza Arsalani Zadeh
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2018; 33(10): 1319.     CrossRef
  • LOOP ILEOSTOMY CLOSURE (review)
    I. S. Lantsov, A. I. Moskalev, O. I. Sushkov
    Koloproktologia.2018; (2): 102.     CrossRef
  • The effect of purse-string approximation versus linear approximation of ileostomy reversal wounds on morbidity rates and patient satisfaction: the 'STOMA' trial
    D. P. O’Leary, M. Carter, D. Wijewardene, M. Burton, D. Waldron, E. Condon, J. C. Coffey, C. Peirce
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2017; 21(11): 863.     CrossRef
Case Reports
Incidentally Solitary, Synchronous, Metastatic Left Adrenal Mass From Colon Cancer
Mina Alvandipour, Mohammad Yasin Karami, Mehdi Khalvati, Hamed Khodabakhsh
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(2):79-82.   Published online April 30, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.2.79
  • 7,425 View
  • 50 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

The authors report the case of a 63-year-old man who underwent an open adrenalectomy for a synchronous, malignant, metastatic left adrenal tumor and a total colectomy for T3N0M1 (stage 4) primary, malignant colon cancer. Two polypoid lesions, one measuring 40 mm × 30 mm × 30 mm and the other measuring 20 mm × 10 mm × 10 mm, were found in the ascending colon and rectosigmoid (RS) junction, respectively, and a synchronous, malignant, left adrenal gland lesion measuring 70 mm × 50 mm × 30 mm was incidentally found on abdominal computed tomography scan. Histological examination revealed a metastatic, necrotic adenocarcinoma of the left adrenal mass, an adenocarcinoma of the cecal mass, and an adenomatous polyp (tubulovillous type) of the smallest polypoid lesion in RS junction that had invaded deeply into the submucosal layer. The patient recovered uneventfully, and his condition is now stable, with no evidence of local recurrence or metastatic disease, 2 years after the surgery. To the best of our knowledge, only 25 cases of an adrenalectomy for treating metastatic adrenal gland tumors have been reported to date; physicians should be aware of the possibility of this event.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Surgical resection of adrenal metastasis from colorectal cancers: a systematic review
    Thi Ai Van Terresa Nguyen, Sze Ling Wong, Zi Qin Ng
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2024; 94(4): 545.     CrossRef
  • An Adrenal Incidentaloma After Colon/Rectal Cancer Surgery: A Primer Lesion or Metastasis—A Case Report
    Adalet Daş, İbrahim Ethem Cakcak, Derya Karabulut, Dicle Tamer Türk
    SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Solitary metastasis of colorectal cancer in the left adrenal gland 4 years after surgery on the primary tumor. Case report
    Marina D. Budurova, Vladimir S. Trifanov, Vladimir V. Kopylov, Olga S. Kuznetsova, Maria A. Chernichenko, Sergey I. Poluektov
    Journal of Modern Oncology.2023; 25(3): 401.     CrossRef
  • Synchronous contralateral adrenal metastasis of colorectal cancer: case report
    Micaela Raices, Luis Boccalatte, Gustavo Rossi, Fernando Wright
    Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
Late Presentation of Anal Canal Duplication in Adults: A Series of Four Rare Cases
Rezvan Mirzaei, Bahar Mahjubi, Mina Alvandipoor, Mohammad Yasin Karami
Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(1):34-36.   Published online February 28, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.1.34
  • 7,857 View
  • 50 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 11 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

Anal canal duplication (ACD) is a very rare condition, especially in adults. Four cases in adults are reported. In three cases, the orifice of duplication was located behind the native anus, and in one case, it was located anteriorly. In all cases, no communication between the anal canal and the tract of duplication was noted. Complete removals of the duplications were done through a perineal approach. Histology showed fibro-muscular tissue lined with a squamous epithelium. The postoperative courses were uneventful.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Anal canal duplication with heterotopic gastric mucosa and anal stenosis: first case report and literature review
    Chen Liu, Chuanzhen Xu, Xiaoliang Xu, Yan Zhang, Lei Geng, Yanhui Mei, Hong Ji, Tingliang Fu, Guojian Ding
    Frontiers in Pediatrics.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cystic lesions of the retrorectal space
    Ian S Brown, Anna Sokolova, Christophe Rosty, Rondell P Graham
    Histopathology.2023; 82(2): 232.     CrossRef
  • Anal Canal Duplication in a 25-Year-Old Female Patient
    Mauricio Gutierrez-Alvarez, Jorge Leal, Kevin Fuentes, Fernando Sotelo, Irving Fuentes, Daniel Camacho
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Anal Canal Duplication Mimicking Recurrent Abscess: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
    Dandan Li, Shuaibin Liu, Jiexiong Feng, Jixin Yang
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Early Diagnosis of Anal Canal Duplication: The Importance of a Physical Examination
    Ioannis Karamatzanis, Panagiota Kosmidou, Stavros Harmanis, Ioannis Karamatzanis, Giorgos Harmanis
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Case Report: Anal canal duplication associated with anorectal stenosis—A rare presentation
    Zhen Zheng, Dong Xiao, Junxiang Wang, Haozhong Xu, Jianxiong Mao, Xiuliang Wang
    Frontiers in Pediatrics.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Anal Canal Duplication in an Adult Female—Case Report and Pathology Guiding
    Tudor Mateescu, Cristi Tarta, Paul Stanciu, Alis Dema, Fulger Lazar
    Medicina.2021; 57(11): 1205.     CrossRef
  • Anal duplication: is surgery indicated? A report of three cases and review of the literature
    A. C. Trecartin, A. Peña, M. Lovell, J. Bruny, C. Mueller, M. Urquidi, Andrea Bischoff
    Pediatric Surgery International.2019; 35(9): 971.     CrossRef
  • Anal Canal Duplication Associated with Presacral Cyst in an Adult
    Takayuki Toyonaga, Hiromitsu Matsuda, Ryuichi Mibu, Yohei Tominaga, Keiji Hirata, Masafumi Takeyoshi, Masazumi Tsuneyoshi
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2018; 2(1): 31.     CrossRef
  • Anal canal duplication presenting with abscess formation
    Shohei Honda, Masashi Minato, Hisayuki Miyagi, Hiromi Okada, Akinobu Taketomi
    Pediatrics International.2017; 59(4): 500.     CrossRef
  • Anal canal duplication and triplication: a rare entity with different presentations
    P. Palazon, V. Julia, L. Saura, I. de Haro, M. Bejarano, C. Rovira, X. Tarrado
    Pediatric Surgery International.2017; 33(5): 609.     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP