Annals of Coloproctology

Guideline

ERAS

The 2024 Korean Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines for colorectal cancer: a secondary publication: Kil-yong Lee, Soo Young Lee, Miyoung Choi, Moonjin Kim, Ji Hong Kim, Ju Myung Song, Seung Yoon Yang, In Jun Yang, Moon Suk Choi, Seung Rim Han, Eon Chul Han, Sang Hyun Hong, Do Joong Park, Sang-Jae Park, the Korean Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Committee within the Korean Society of Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition; Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(1):3-26. Published online February 20, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00836.0119

698 View
84 Download

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: The Korean Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Committee within the Korean Society of Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition was established to develop ERAS guidelines tailored to the Korean context. This guideline focuses on creating the most current evidence-based practice guidelines for ERAS purposes, based on systematic reviews. All key questions targeted randomized controlled trials exclusively, and if fewer than 2 were available, studies employing propensity score matching were also included. Recommendations for each key question were marked with strength of recommendation and level of evidence following internal and external review processes by the committee.

Original Article

Minimally invasive surgery

Learning curve for single-port robot-assisted colectomy: Moon Suk Choi, Seong Hyeon Yun, Sung Chul Lee, Jung Kyong Shin, Yoon Ah Park, Jungwook Huh, Yong Beom Cho, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(1):44-51. Published online December 20, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00745.0106

3,455 View
215 Download
3 Web of Science
3 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
Since the introduction of robotic surgery, robots for colorectal cancer have replaced laparoscopic surgery, and a single-port robot (SPR) platform has been launched and is being used to treat patients. We analyzed the learning curve and initial complications of using an SPR platform in colorectal cancer surgery.
Methods
We reviewed 39 patients who underwent SPR colectomy from April to October 2019. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon using an SPR device. A learning curve was generated using the cumulative sum methodology to assess changes in total operation time, docking time, and surgeon console time. We grouped the patients into 3 groups according to the time period: the first 11 were phase 1, the next 11 were phase 2, and the last 17 were phase 3.
Results
The mean age of the patients was 61.28±13.03 years, and they had a mean body mass index of 23.79±2.86 kg/m2. Among the patients, 23 (59.0%) were male, and 16 (41.0%) were female. The average operation time was 186.59±51.30 minutes, the average surgeon console time was 95.49±35.33 minutes, and the average docking time (time from skin incision to robot docking) was 14.87±10.38 minutes. The surgeon console time differed significantly among the different phases (P<0.001). Complications occurred in 8 patients: 2 ileus, 2 postoperation hemoglobin changes, 3 urinary retentions, and 1 complicated fluid collection.
Conclusion
In our experience, the learning curve for SPR colectomy was achieved after the 18th case.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Da Vinci single-port robotic system current application and future perspective in general surgery: A scoping review
Francesco Celotto, Niccolò Ramacciotti, Alberto Mangano, Giacomo Danieli, Federico Pinto, Paula Lopez, Alvaro Ducas, Jessica Cassiani, Luca Morelli, Gaya Spolverato, Francesco Maria Bianco
Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(9): 4814. CrossRef
Wristed articulated instrumentation for single‐incision plus one‐port laparoscopic surgery for obstructed sigmoid colon cancer—A video vignette
Sung Uk Bae
Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(9): 1782. CrossRef
Evaluation of the da Vinci single-port system in colorectal cancer surgery: a scoping review
Arcangelo Picciariello, Alfredo Annicchiarico, Gaetano Gallo, Agnese Dezi, Ugo Grossi
Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(7): 2515. CrossRef

Technical Note

Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Minimally invasive surgery

Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences: Moon Suk Choi, Seong Hyeon Yun, Jung Kyong Shin, Yoon Ah Park, Jung Wook Huh, Yong Beom Cho, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee; Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(1):88-92. Published online October 18, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056

3,931 View
133 Download
6 Web of Science
6 Citations

Abstract PDF

Recently, abdominoperineal resection (APR) using a robot has been demonstrated in other studies. However, there has been no report on APR for rectal cancer using the single-port robot (SPR) platform. In response to this research gap, we described the clinical experience of APR using a SPR. From April 2019 to March 2020, APR using a SPR platform was performed in a total of 4 patients. Three patients had a transumbilical approach, and 1 patient had a transstoma site approach. The average operation time was 307 minutes, and the patient docking time to the SPR platform was 133.5 minutes. There were no complications during the operation, and no laparoscopy or open conversion. No reoperation occurred within 30 days. Mild postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients. We found that APR has safety and feasibility in surgery using an SPR platform. There was no intraoperative event and severe postoperative complications.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Single-incision laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal-hernia repair using the new articulating instruments: A video vignette
Chul Seung Lee, Gwan Chul Lee, Choon Sik Chung, Dong Keun Lee
Asian Journal of Surgery.2024; 47(8): 3586. CrossRef
Evaluation of the da Vinci single-port system in colorectal cancer surgery: a scoping review
Arcangelo Picciariello, Alfredo Annicchiarico, Gaetano Gallo, Agnese Dezi, Ugo Grossi
Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(7): 2515. CrossRef
Single-incision robotic colorectal surgery with the da Vinci SP® surgical system: initial results of 50 cases
H. S. Kim, B.-Y. Oh, C. Cheong, M. H. Park, S. S. Chung, R.-A. Lee, K. H. Kim, G. T. Noh
Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(7): 589. CrossRef
Short-term outcomes of single-incision robotic colectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer
Ho Seung Kim, Bo-Young Oh, Soon Sup Chung, Ryung-Ah Lee, Gyoung Tae Noh
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2023; 17(5): 2351. CrossRef
Short-term outcomes of da Vinci SP versus Xi for colon cancer surgery: a propensity-score matching analysis of multicenter cohorts
Jin-Min Jung, Young Il Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Songsoo Yang, Min Hyun Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2023; 17(6): 2911. CrossRef
Surgical Techniques for Transanal Local Excision for Early Rectal Cancer
Gyoung Tae Noh
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef

Original Article

Malignant disease, Prognosis and adjuvant therapy

Long-term Oncologic Outcome of Postoperative Complications After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: Chang Kyu Oh, Jung Wook Huh, You Jin Lee, Moon Suk Choi, Dae Hee Pyo, Sung Chul Lee, Seong Mun Park, Jung Kyong Shin, Yoon Ah Park, Yong Beom Cho, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee; Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):273-280. Published online November 13, 2019; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.10.15

4,863 View
167 Download
21 Web of Science
21 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
The impact of postoperative complications on long-term oncologic outcome after radical colorectal cancer surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the risk factors and oncologic outcomes of surgery-related postoperative complication groups.
Methods
From January 2010 to December 2010, 310 patients experienced surgery-related postoperative complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery. These stage I–III patients were classified into 2 subgroups, minor (grades I, II) and major (grades III, IV) complication groups, according to extended Clavien-Dindo classification system criteria. Clinicopathologic differences between the 2 groups were analyzed to identify risk factors for major complications. The diseasefree survival rates of surgery-related postoperative complication groups were also compared.
Results
Minor and major complication groups were stratified with 194 patients (62.6%) and 116 patients (37.4%), respectively. The risk factors influencing the major complication group were pathologic N category and operative method. The prognostic factors associated with disease-free survival were preoperative perforation, perineural invasion, tumor budding, and receiving neoadjuvant therapy. With a median follow-up period of 72.2 months, the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 84.4% in the minor group and 78.5% in the major group, but there was no statistical significance between the minor and major groups (P = 0.392).
Conclusion
Advanced cancer and open surgery were identified as risk factors for increased surgery-related major complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery. However, severity of postoperative complications did not affect disease-free survival from colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Oncologic impact of technical difficulties during the early experience with laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: long-term follow-up results of a prospective cohort study
Hong-min Ahn, Tae Gyun Lee, Hye-Rim Shin, Jeehye Lee, In Jun Yang, Jung Wook Suh, Heung-Kwon Oh, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang
Current Problems in Surgery.2025; 63: 101694. CrossRef
Impact of Preoperative and Intraoperative Factors on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A 10-Year Retrospective Study
Lucian Flavius Herlo, Ioana Golu, Alexandra Herlo, Claudia Raluca Balasa Virzob, Ionescu Alin, Stela Iurciuc, Ionut Eduard Iordache, Luana Alexandrescu, Doina Ecaterina Tofolean, Raluca Dumache
Diseases.2025; 13(1): 16. CrossRef
Accelerated enhanced recovery after colon cancer surgery with discharge within one day after surgery: a systematic review
Misha A. T. Sier, Anke H. C. Gielen, Thaís T. T. Tweed, Noémi C. van Nie, Tim Lubbers, Jan H. M. B. Stoot
BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Risk Factors of Postoperative Complication and Hospital Mortality after Colorectal Perforation Surgery
Kensuke Kudou, Shuhei Kajiwara, Takashi Motomura, Takafumi Yukaya, Tomonori Nakanoko, Yosuke Kuroda, Masahiro Okamoto, Tadashi Koga, Yo-Ichi Yamashita
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2024; 8(2): 118. CrossRef
Predictive value of POSSUM scoring system for postoperative complications and mortality in elderly patients with colorectal cancer
Qiang Li, Yingjun Lu
Technology and Health Care.2024; 32(6): 4653. CrossRef
Postoperative Complications Result in Poor Oncological Outcomes: What Is the Evidence?
Anjana Wajekar, Sohan Lal Solanki, Juan Cata, Vijaya Gottumukkala
Current Oncology.2024; 31(8): 4632. CrossRef
The role of robotic-assisted surgery in the management of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Chenxiong Zhang, Hao Tan, Han Xu, Jiaming Ding
International Journal of Surgery.2024; 110(10): 6282. CrossRef
Effect of postoperative complications on 5-year survival following laparoscopic surgery for resectable colorectal cancer: a retrospective study
Jae Eun Lee, Kyeong Eui Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek, Sung Uk Bae
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery in Rectal Cancer: Analysis of Medium-Term Oncological Outcomes
Jing-jing Li, Zhi-bo Zhang, Shi-yun Xu, Cheng-ren Zhang, Xiong-fei Yang, Yao-xing Duan
Surgical Innovation.2023; 30(1): 36. CrossRef
Do postoperative infectious complications really affect long‐term survival in colorectal cancer surgery? A multicenter retrospective cohort study
Akihisa Matsuda, Hiroshi Maruyama, Shinji Akagi, Toru Inoue, Kenichiro Uemura, Minako Kobayashi, Hisanori Shiomi, Manabu Watanabe, Hiroki Arai, Yutaka Kojima, Yusuke Mizuuchi, Hajime Yokomizo, Yuji Toiyama, Toru Miyake, Yasuyuki Yokoyama, Kei Ishimaru, Sh
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2023; 7(1): 110. CrossRef
International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment
Audrius Dulskas, Philip F. Caushaj, Domas Grigoravicius, Liu Zheng, Richard Fortunato, Joseph W. Nunoo-Mensah, Narimantas E. Samalavicius
Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(4): 307. CrossRef
Effect of serum lactate dehydrogenase-to-albumin ratio (LAR) on the short-term outcomes and long-term prognosis of colorectal cancer after radical surgery
Xin-Peng Shu, Ying-Chun Xiang, Fei Liu, Yong Cheng, Wei Zhang, Dong Peng
BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Modified Clavien–Dindo–sink classification system for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Ndéye F. Guissé, Joseph D. Stone, Lukas G. Keil, Tracey P. Bastrom, Mark A. Erickson, Burt Yaszay, Patrick J. Cahill, Stefan Parent, Peter G. Gabos, Peter O. Newton, Michael P. Glotzbecker, Michael P. Kelly, Joshua M. Pahys, Nicholas D. Fletcher
Spine Deformity.2022; 10(1): 87. CrossRef
Surgical site infection after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer is associated with compromised long-term oncological outcome
Nana Sugamata, Takashi Okuyama, Emiko Takeshita, Haruka Oi, Yuhei Hakozaki, Shunya Miyazaki, Musashi Takada, Takashi Mitsui, Takuji Noro, Hideyuki Yoshitomi, Masatoshi Oya
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Does Preoperative Waiting Time Affect the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer Patients? A Retrospective Study from the West of China
Xiao-Yu Liu, Zi-Wei Li, Bing Kang, Yu-Xi Cheng, Wei Tao, Bin Zhang, Hua Zhang, Zheng-Qiang Wei, Dong Peng, Antonio Giovanni Solimando
Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 2022: 1. CrossRef
Surgical safety in the COVID-19 era: present and future considerations
Young Il Kim, In Ja Park
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 102(6): 295. CrossRef
Current status and role of robotic approach in patients with low-lying rectal cancer
Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(1): 1. CrossRef
Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer
Sung Uk Bae
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 577. CrossRef
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, and Current Management
Seung Mi Yeo, Gyung Mo Son
The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Current Status and Future of Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
Sung Uk Bae
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 221. CrossRef
A propensity score-matched analysis of advanced energy devices and conventional monopolar device for colorectal cancer surgery: comparison of clinical and oncologic outcomes
Woo Jin Song, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(5): 290. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search