Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
6 "Se-Jin Baek"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Display
Original Articles
Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer,Epidemiology & etiology
Characteristics and outcomes of colorectal cancer surgery by age in a tertiary center in Korea: a retrospective review
Tae-Hoon Lee, Jeong Min Choo, Jeong Sub Kim, Seon Hui Shin, Ji-Seon Kim, Se-Jin Baek, Jung-Myun Kwak, Jin Kim, Seon-Hahn Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(3):244-252.   Published online November 4, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00619.0088
  • 5,304 View
  • 159 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 15 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Colorectal cancer (CRC) occurs in all age groups, and the application of treatment may vary according to age. The study was designed to identify the characteristics of CRC by age.
Methods
A total of 4,326 patients undergoing primary resection for CRC from September 2006 to July 2019 were reviewed. Patient and tumor characteristics, operative and postoperative data, and oncologic outcome were compared
Results
Patients aged 60 to 69 years comprised the largest age group (29.7%), followed by those aged 50 to 59 and 70 to 79 (24.5% and 23.9%, respectively). Rectal cancer was common in all age groups, but right-sided colon cancer tended to be more frequent in older patients. In very elderly patients, there were significant numbers of emergency surgeries, and the frequencies of open surgery and permanent stoma were greater. In contrast, total abdominal colectomy or total proctocolectomy was performed frequently in patients in their teens and twenties. The elderly patients showed more advanced tumor stages and postoperative ileus. The incidence of adjuvant treatment was low in elderly patients, who also had shorter follow-up periods. Overall survival was reduced in older patients with stages 0 to 3 CRC (P<0.001), but disease-free survival did not differ by age (P=0.391).
Conclusion
CRC screening at an earlier age than is currently undertaken may be necessary in Korea. In addition, improved surgical and oncological outcomes can be achieved through active treatment of the growing number of elderly CRC patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effects of the Strength, Assistance in walking, Rise from a chair, Climb stairs, and Falls score on postoperative clinical outcomes following colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective study
    Young Jae Kim, Sung Uk Bae, Kyeong Eui Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.2025; 79(4): 358.     CrossRef
  • Immunological changes and recovery-related factors in older patients with colon cancer: A pilot trial
    Byeo Lee Lim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Yousun Ko, Kyung Won Kim, In Ja Park
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2025; 16(3): 102200.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of body composition changes and nutritional status after surgery between older Japanese patients with upper and lower gastrointestinal cancer
    Eiko Takano, Tsukasa Aritake, Kakeru Hashimoto, Yumi Suzuki, Yuichi Kitagawa, Ken Fujishiro, Yasuji Kawabata, Shinichirou Kobayashi, Izumi Kondo
    The Journal of Aging Research & Lifestyle.2025; 14: 100006.     CrossRef
  • Oncologic outcomes of surgically treated colorectal cancer in octogenarians: a comparative study using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)
    Soo Young Oh, Jung Yun Park, Kwan Mo Yang, Seong-A Jeong, Yong Jae Kwon, Yun Tae Jung, Chung Hyeun Ma, Keong Won Yun, Kwang Hyun Yoon, Jae Young Kwak, Chang Sik Yu
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Oncologic outcomes and associated factors of colon cancer patients aged 70 years and older
    Byeo Lee Lim, In Ja Park, Jun-Soo Ro, Young Il Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(3): 198.     CrossRef
  • Influence of additional prophylactic oral antibiotics during mechanical bowel preparation on surgical site infection in patients receiving colorectal surgery
    Hayoung Lee, Jong Lyul Lee, Ji Sung Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok‐Byung Lim
    World Journal of Surgery.2024; 48(6): 1534.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping on Improving Diagnostic Values of CT D3 Lymph Node Staging for Right-Sided Colon Cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Tae Un Kim, Mi Sook Yun, ChangYeop Kim, In Young Lee, Su Bum Park, Dong-Hoon Shin, Gi Won Ha
    Cancers.2024; 16(20): 3496.     CrossRef
  • Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341.     CrossRef
  • The Latest Results and Future Directions of Research for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery in the Field of Colorectal Surgery
    Min Ki Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Surgical Techniques for Transanal Local Excision for Early Rectal Cancer
    Gyoung Tae Noh
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer
    In Ja Park
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Is the oncological impact of vascular invasion more important in right colon cancer?
    Gyung Mo Son
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2022; 25(2): 49.     CrossRef
  • Tailoring strategies for colorectal cancer screening and treatment based on age in colorectal cancer patients
    Eun Jung Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(3): 181.     CrossRef
  • Surgical treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 568.     CrossRef
  • Recent Advance in the Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 213.     CrossRef
Clinical Outcomes of Ileostomy Closure According to Timing During Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Rectal Cancer Surgery
Yoo Jin Choi, Jung-Myun Kwak, Neul Ha, Tae Hoon Lee, Se Jin Baek, Jin Kim, Seon Hahn Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(4):187-193.   Published online August 31, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.10.18.1
  • 5,934 View
  • 178 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 13 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
No guidelines exist detailing when to implement a temporary ileostomy closure in the setting of adjuvant chemotherapy following sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and oncological outcomes of ileostomy closure during adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with curative resection of rectal cancer.
Methods
This retrospective study investigated 220 patients with rectal cancer undergoing sphincter-saving surgery with protective loop ileostomy from January 2007 to August 2016. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 (n = 161) who underwent stoma closure during adjuvant chemotherapy and group 2 (n = 59) who underwent stoma closure after adjuvant chemotherapy.
Results
No significant differences were observed in operative time, blood loss, postoperative hospital stay, or postoperative complications in ileostomy closure between the 2 groups. No difference in overall survival (P = 0.959) or disease-free survival (P = 0.114) was observed between the 2 groups.
Conclusion
Ileostomy closure during adjuvant chemotherapy was clinically safe, and interruption of chemotherapy due to ileostomy closure did not change oncologic outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Early closure of protective ileostomy—a benefit for the patient?
    Zuzana Adamová, Michaela Filová, Veronika Pechalová, Martin Chrostek, Radim Slováček
    European Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical Outcomes of Ileostomy Closure during versus after Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Rectal Cancer
    Fan He, Fuyu Yang, Chenglin Tang, Defei Chen, Dongqin Zhao, Junjie Xiong, Yu Zou, Guoquan Huang, Kun Qian, Masanao Nakamura
    Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 2024: 1.     CrossRef
  • Prophylactic effect of retromuscular mesh placement during loop ileostomy closure on incisional hernia incidence—a multicentre randomised patient- and observer-blind trial (P.E.L.I.O.N trial)
    Sven Müller, Dirk Weyhe, Florian Herrle, Philipp Horvath, Robert Bachmann, Viktor von Ehrlich-Treuenstätt, Patrick Heger, Nadir Nasir, Christina Klose, Alexander Ritz, Anja Sander, Erich Grohmann, Colette Dörr-Harim, André L. Mihaljevic
    Trials.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of chemotherapy on surgical outcomes in ileostomy reversal: a propensity score matching study from a single centre
    H.-H. Cheng, Y.-C. Shao, C.-Y. Lin, T.-W. Chiang, M.-C. Chen, T.-Y. Chiu, Y.-L. Huang, C.-C. Chen, C.-P. Chen, F.-F. Chiang
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(12): 1227.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of clinical outcomes of stoma reversal during versus after chemotherapy for rectal cancer patients
    Kun-Yu Tsai, Jeng-Fu You, Shu-Huan Huang, Tzong-yun Tsai, Pao-Shiu Hsieh, Cheng-Chou Lai, Wen-Sy Tsai, Hsin-Yuan Hung
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Early versus late closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis
    Li Wang, Xinling Chen, Chen Liao, Qian Wu, Hongliang Luo, Fengming Yi, Yiping Wei, Wenxiong Zhang
    Surgery Today.2021; 51(4): 463.     CrossRef
  • Low albumin level and longer interval to closure increase the early complications after ileostomy closure
    HyungJoo Baik, Ki Beom Bae
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2021; 44(1): 352.     CrossRef
  • Does the timing of protective ileostomy closure post-low anterior resection have an impact on the outcome? A retrospective study
    Fozan Sauri, Ahmad Sakr, Ho Seung Kim, Mohammed Alessa, Radwan Torky, Eman Zakarneh, Seung Yoon Yang, Nam Kyu Kim
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2021; 44(1): 374.     CrossRef
  • Impact of a defunctioning ileostomy and time to stoma closure on bowel function after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    I. Vogel, N. Reeves, P. J. Tanis, W. A. Bemelman, J. Torkington, R. Hompes, J. A. Cornish
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2021; 25(7): 751.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Outcomes of Ileostomy Closure before Adjuvant Chemotherapy after Rectal Cancer Surgery: An Observational Study from a Chinese Center
    Zhen Sun, Yufeng Zhao, Lu Liu, Jichao Qin, Zhongguang Luo
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • Delayed ileostomy closure increases the odds of Clostridium difficile infection
    Simon J. G. Richards, Dilshan K. Udayasiri, Ian T. Jones, Ian A. Hastie, Raaj Chandra, Jacob J. McCormick, Timothy J. Chittleborough, David J. Read, Ian P. Hayes
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(12): 3213.     CrossRef
  • The effect of ileostomy closure timing on low anterior resection syndrome in patient who underwent low anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Hemn Hussain Kaka Ali, Qalandar Hussein Abdulkarim, Karzan Seerwan, Barham M. M .Salih, Omar H Ghalib Hawramy, Dara Ahmed Mohammed, Syamand Orhaman Ahmed
    Kurdistan Journal of Applied Research.2021; : 126.     CrossRef
  • Assessment of the risk of permanent stoma after low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients
    Marcin Zeman, Marek Czarnecki, Andrzej Chmielarz, Adam Idasiak, Maciej Grajek, Agnieszka Czarniecka
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
Early Systemic Failure After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for the Treatment of Patients With Rectal Cancer
Taesun Choi, Se-Jin Baek, Jung Myun Kwak, Jin Kim, Seon-Hahn Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(2):94-99.   Published online April 30, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.08.28
  • 4,550 View
  • 75 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Distant metastasis can occur early after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in patients with rectal cancer. This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical characteristics of patients who developed early systemic failure.
Methods
The patients who underwent neoadjuvant CRT for a rectal adenocarcinoma between June 2007 and July 2015 were included in this study. Patients who developed distant metastasis within 6 months after CRT were identified. We compared short- and long-term clinicopathologic outcomes of patients in the early failure (EF) group with those of patients in the control group.
Results
Of 107 patients who underwent neoadjuvant CRT for rectal cancer, 7 developed early systemic failure. The lung was the most common metastatic site. In the EF group, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen was higher (5 mg/mL vs. 2 mg/mL, P = 0.010), and capecitabine as a sensitizer of CRT was used more frequently (28.6% vs. 3%, P = 0.002). Of the 7 patients in the EF group, only 4 underwent a primary tumor resection (57.1%), in contrast to the 100% resection rate in the control group (P < 0.001). In terms of pathologic outcomes, ypN and TNM stages were more advanced in the EF group (P < 0.001 and P = 0.047, respectively), and numbers of positive and retrieved lymph nodes were much higher (P < 0.001 and P = 0.027, respectively).
Conclusion
Although early distant metastasis after CRT for rectal cancer is very rare, patients who developed early metastasis showed a poor nodal response with a low primary tumor resection rate and poor oncologic outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Characteristics of Patients Presented With Metastases During or After Completion of Chemoradiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Case Series
    Radwan Torky, Mohammed Alessa, Ho Seung Kim, Ahmed Sakr, Eman Zakarneh, Fozan Sauri, Heejin Bae, Nam Kyu Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(3): 186.     CrossRef
  • Challenges and shifting treatment strategies in the surgical treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer
    Ho Seung Kim, Nam Kyu Kim
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2020; 4(4): 379.     CrossRef
Anastomotic Sinus That Developed From Leakage After a Rectal Cancer Resection: Should We Wait for Closure of the Stoma Until the Complete Resolution of the Sinus?
Chris Tae-Young Chung, Se-Jin Baek, Jung-Myun Kwak, Jin Kim, Seon-Hahn Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(1):30-35.   Published online January 25, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.08.13
  • 6,605 View
  • 153 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The aims of this study were to identify the clinical characteristics of an anastomotic sinus and to assess the validity of delaying stoma closure in patients until the complete resolution of an anastomotic sinus.
Methods
The subject patients are those who had undergone a resection of rectal cancer from 2011 to 2017, who had a diversion ileostomy protectively or therapeutically and who developed a sinus as a sequelae of anastomotic leakage. The primary outcomes that were measured were the incidence, management and outcomes of an anastomotic sinus.
Results
Of the 876 patients who had undergone a low anterior resection, 14 (1.6%) were found to have had an anastomotic sinus on sigmoidoscopy or a gastrografin enema before their ileostomy closure. In the 14 patients with a sinus, 7 underwent ileostomy closure as scheduled, with a mean closure time of 4.1 months. The remaining 7 patients underwent ileostomy repair, but it was delayed until after the follow-up for the widening of the sinus opening by using digital dilation, with a mean closure time of 6.9 months. Four of those remaining seven patients underwent stoma closure even though their sinus condition had not yet been completely resolved. No pelvic septic complications occurred after closure in any of the 14 patients with an anastomotic sinus, but 2 of the 14 needed a rediversion due to a severe anastomotic stricture.
Conclusion
Patients with an anastomotic sinus who had been carefully selected underwent successful ileostomy closure without delay.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Management of Low-Rectal Anastomotic Sinus With Transanal Minimally Invasive Septotomy
    Nirvana B. Saraswat, Scott A. Brill, William E. Wise
    The American Surgeon™.2023; 89(2): 322.     CrossRef
  • The management of asymptomatic radiological anastomotic leakage following anterior resection
    Mohamed Rabie, Laura Parry, Iannish Sadien, Sandeep Kapur, Adam Stearns, Irshad Shaikh
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2022; 92(4): 801.     CrossRef
  • Chronische Anastomoseninsuffizienz nach tiefer Rektumresektion – ein ungelöstes Problem?
    Peter Kienle, Jörn Richard Magdeburg
    Der Chirurg.2021; 92(7): 605.     CrossRef
  • Response to Dioscoridi et al.
    G. I. Popivanov, V. M. Mutafchiyski, R. Cirocchi, S. D. Chipeva, V. V. Vasilev, K. T. Kjossev, M. S. Tabakov
    Colorectal Disease.2020; 22(7): 841.     CrossRef
  • Anastomotic Sinus Developed From Leakage in Rectal Cancer Resection: When Can We Reverse the Defunctioning Stoma?
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2019; 35(1): 1.     CrossRef
Current Status and Trends in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery in Korea: Analysis of Data in a Nationwide Registry
Se-Jin Baek, Kil Yeon Lee, Ki Hwan Song, Chang Sik Yu, for the Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Study Group of the Korean Society of Coloproctology
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):299-305.   Published online December 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.07.21
  • 7,088 View
  • 161 Download
  • 17 Web of Science
  • 16 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in Korea has been increasing in recent years, but accurate statistics about operations for IBD are lacking. The purpose of this study was to investigate the trends and current status of IBD surgeries in Korea.
Methods
Using a national database from the Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service, we analyzed data from patients who underwent surgery for Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis from January 2009 to October 2016. Results: The mean number of patients who underwent surgery for Crohn disease was 791.8 per year. Colorectal surgery, small bowel surgery, and anal surgery were performed fairly often (31.2%, 29.4%, 39.4%, respectively), and laparoscopic surgery continued to increase, recently exceeding 30%. About 50% of Crohn patients used biologics before and after surgery, and those patients also underwent a relatively high rate of anal surgeries (44.2%). The mean number of patients who underwent surgery for ulcerative colitis was 247.6 per year. Colorectal surgery accounted for more than half of all operations, and laparoscopic surgery has been increasing rapidly, having been performed in about 60% of patients in recent years. The incidence of colorectal cancer in patients with ulcerative colitis was very high and increased rapidly during the study period, reaching about 80%.
Conclusion
The number of patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for IBD in Korea has increased significantly. Biologics are actively used by patients with Crohn disease, with a high proportion of anal surgeries required. Many of the surgical indications for ulcerative colitis have shifted into colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The impact of advanced medical therapies on time to resection and colorectal cancer outcomes in ulcerative colitis patients undergoing colectomy
    Eva Visser, Antonio Luberto, Lianne Heuthorst, Roel Hompes, Séverine Vermeire, Geert R D’Haens, Willem A Bemelman, André D’Hoore, Gabriele Bislenghi, Christianne J Buskens
    Journal of Crohn's and Colitis.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical Significance of Prognostic Nutrition Index in Patients with Crohn’s Disease after Primary Bowel Resection
    Hyeon Woo Bae, Yong Joon Lee, Min Young Park, Seung Yoon Yang, Yoon Dae Han, Min Soo Cho, Hyuk Hur, Kang Young Lee, Jae Hee Cheon, Joseph C. Carmichael, Byung Soh Min
    Yonsei Medical Journal.2024; 65(7): 380.     CrossRef
  • The Hydrophobic Amino Acid-Rich Fish Collagen Peptide Ameliorates Dextran Sulfate Sodium-Induced Ulcerative Colitis in Mice via Repairing the Intestinal Barrier, Regulating Intestinal Flora and AA Metabolism
    Limei Yang, Yiting Wang, Xuan Li, Yonger Chen, Jian Liang, Lian He, Dongxu Jiang, Song Huang, Shaozhen Hou
    Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry.2024; 72(46): 25690.     CrossRef
  • Increased Proportion of Colorectal Cancer in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis Undergoing Surgery in the Netherlands
    Lianne Heuthorst, Houda Harbech, Harmanna J. Snijder, Aart Mookhoek, Geert R. D'Haens, Séverine Vermeire, André D'Hoore, Willem A. Bemelman, Christianne J. Buskens
    American Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 118(5): 848.     CrossRef
  • Optimal surgical management of duodenal fistula in Crohn’s disease: a Korean multicenter cohort study
    Soo Young Oh, Young Il Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Min Soo Cho, Min Young Park, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Molecular characterization of dysplasia-initiated colorectal cancer with assessing matched tumor and dysplasia samples
    Sungwon Jung, Jong Lyul Lee, Tae Won Kim, Jongmin Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Kil Yeon Lee, Ki-hwan Song, Chang Sik Yu, Yong Beom Cho
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(1): 72.     CrossRef
  • New insights on the surgical management of ulcerative colitis in the 21st century
    Paulo G Kotze, Lianne Heuthorst, Amy L Lightner, Aderson O M C Damião, Willem A Bemelman
    The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2022; 7(7): 679.     CrossRef
  • Surgical management of Crohn’s disease: a state of the art review
    Elise Maria Meima - van Praag, Christianne Johanna Buskens, Roel Hompes, Wilhelmus Adrianus Bemelman
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(6): 1133.     CrossRef
  • Surgical options for perianal fistula in patients with Crohn's disease: A comparison of seton placement, fistulotomy, and stem cell therapy
    Min Young Park, Yong Sik Yoon, Hyoung Eun Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2021; 44(11): 1383.     CrossRef
  • Improving the care of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients: perspectives and strategies for IBD center management
    Jihye Park, Sinyoung Park, Shin Ae Lee, Soo Jung Park, Jae Hee Cheon
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2021; 36(5): 1040.     CrossRef
  • Short-term and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs open ileocolic resection in patients with Crohn's disease: Propensity-score matching analysis
    Shin Jeong Pak, Young Il Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Jong Lyul Lee, Jung Bok Lee, Chang Sik Yu
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(41): 7159.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Age on the Initiation of Biologic Agent Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Korean Common Data Model Cohort Study
    Youn I Choi, Yoon Jae Kim, Jun-Won Chung, Kyoung Oh Kim, Hakki Kim, Rae Woong Park, Dong Kyun Park
    JMIR Medical Informatics.2020; 8(4): e15124.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Crohn Disease: A Long Way to Go to Identify the Optimal Method
    Soo Yeun Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(4): 207.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Characteristics and Postoperative Outcomes of Patients Presenting With Upper Gastrointestinal Tract Crohn Disease
    Joon Suk Moon, Jong Lyul Lee, Chang Sik Yu, Seok-Byung Lim, In Ja Park, Yong Sik Yoon, Chan Wook Kim, Suk-Kyun Yang, Byong Duk Ye, Sang Hyoung Park, Hassan Abdullah Alsaleem, Jin Cheon Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(4): 243.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Thiopurine on Potential Surgical Intervention in Crohn’s Disease in Korea: Results from the CONNECT Study
    Hee Man Kim, Jin Woo Kim, Hyun-Soo Kim, Joo Sung Kim, You Sun Kim, Jae Hee Cheon, Won Ho Kim, Byong Duk Ye, Won Moon, Sung Hee Jung, Young-Ho Kim, Dong Soo Han
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 10(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • What Are the Major Changes in Korean Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgery?
    Chang-Nam Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(6): 277.     CrossRef
Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for a Tumor-Specific Mesorectal Excision in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Initial Experience With 20 Consecutive Cases
Sung Uk Bae, Se Jin Baek, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Nam Kyu Kim, Hyuk Hur
Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(1):16-22.   Published online February 28, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.1.16
  • 6,713 View
  • 36 Download
  • 30 Web of Science
  • 26 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Single-port plus one-port, reduced-port laparoscopic surgery (RPLS) may decrease collisions between laparoscopic instruments and the camera in a narrow, bony, pelvic cavity while maintaining the cosmetic advantages of single-incision laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study is to describe our initial experience with and to assess the feasibility and safety of RPLS for tumor-specific mesorectal excisions (TSMEs) in patients with colorectal cancer.

Methods

Between May 2010 and August 2012, RPLS for TSME was performed in 20 patients with colorectal cancer. A single port with four channels through an umbilical incision and an additional port in the right lower quadrant were used for RPLS.

Results

The median operation time was 231 minutes (range, 160-347 minutes), and the estimated blood loss was 100 mL (range, 50-500 mL). We transected the rectum with one laparoscopic stapler in 17 cases (85%). The median time to soft diet was 4 days (range, 3-6 days), and the length of hospital stay was 7 days (range, 5-45 days). The median total number of lymph nodes harvested was 16 (range, 7-36), and circumferential resection margin involvement was found in 1 case (5%). Seven patients (35%) developed postoperative complications, and no mortalities occurred within 30 days. During the median follow-up period of 20 months (range, 12-40 months), liver metastasis occurred in 1 patient 10 months after surgery, and local recurrence was nonexistent.

Conclusion

RPLS for TSME in patients with colorectal cancer is technically feasible and safe without compromising oncologic safety. However, further studies comparing RPLS with a conventional, laparoscopic low-anterior resection are needed to prove the advantages of the RPLS procedure.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Short-term outcomes of da Vinci SP versus Xi for rectal cancer surgery: a propensity score matching analysis of two tertiary center cohorts
    Min Hyun Kim, Songsoo Yang, Yong Sik Yoon, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(1): 162.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and safety of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer
    Zhi-min Liu, Qi-jun Yao, Fengyun Pei, Fang He, Yandong Zhao, Jun Huang
    BMC Cancer.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robot‐Assisted Colectomy for Left‐Sided Colon Cancer: Comparison of da Vinci SP and Single‐Site Platforms
    Kyeong Eui Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek, Sung Uk Bae
    The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of surgical performance using articulated (ArtiSential®) and conventional instruments for colorectal laparoscopic surgery: A single‐centre, open, before‐and‐after, prospective study
    Hye Rim Shin, Heung‐Kwon Oh, Hong‐min Ahn, Tae‐Gyun Lee, Mi Jeoung Choi, Min Hyeong Jo, Anuj Naresh Singhi, Duck‐Woo Kim, Sung‐Bum Kang
    Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(12): 2092.     CrossRef
  • Effect of continuous wound infiltration on patients using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain management after reduced-port laparoscopic colorectal surgery
    Hyeon Deok Choi, Sung Uk Bae
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 564.     CrossRef
  • Short-term outcomes of da Vinci SP versus Xi for colon cancer surgery: a propensity-score matching analysis of multicenter cohorts
    Jin-Min Jung, Young Il Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Songsoo Yang, Min Hyun Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    Journal of Robotic Surgery.2023; 17(6): 2911.     CrossRef
  • Short-term and long-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a propensity-matched cohort study with conventional laparoscopic surgery
    Mingyi Wu, Hao Wang, Xuehua Zhang, Jiaolong Shi, Xiaoliang Lan, Tingyu Mou, Yanan Wang
    BMC Gastroenterology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of Sevoflurane versus Propofol on Endogenous Nitric Oxide Metabolism during Laparoscopic Surgery
    Ning Wang, Jing Zhang, Ruiling Zhao, Bin Zhao, Yongzhang Li, Xiaoqing Zhang, Peng Liu, Yang Gao
    Journal of Healthcare Engineering.2021; 2021: 1.     CrossRef
  • Reduced port versus open right hemicolectomy for colorectal cancer: a retrospective comparison study of two centers
    Peter Tschann, Gerald Seitinger, Daniel Lechner, Stephanie Adler, Benedikt Feurstein, Paolo N. C. Girotti, Theresa Schmölzer, Philipp Szeverinski, Felix Aigner, Ingmar Königsrainer
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(7): 1469.     CrossRef
  • Reduced-Port Robotic Right Colectomy with Intracorporeal Anastomosis for Right-Sided Colon Cancer Using the da Vinci Single-Site® Platform: A Pilot Case Series Study
    Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    Annals of Robotic and Innovative Surgery.2021; 2(2): 31.     CrossRef
  • Short‐ And medium‐term outcomes of reduced‐port laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with upper rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study
    Huawen Wu, Zhijian Zheng, Lewei Xu, Yingying Wu, Ziyi Guan, Wenhuan Li, Guofu Chen
    Cancer Medicine.2020; 9(15): 5320.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic resection of retroperitoneal paraganglioma behind the Spiegel lobe in a kyphotic patient: A rare case report
    Hisataka Ogawa, Shin Nakahira, Tomoya Kishimoto, Kazuya Kato, Makoto Hasegawa, Keisuke Oyama, Takayuki Tou, Ryosuke Maki, Hoshi Himura, Hidemi Nishi, Nobuyoshi Ohhara, Jota Mikami, Yoichi Makari, Ken Nakata, Masaki Tsujie, Junya Fujita, Hiroki Ohzato
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2019; 12(3): 344.     CrossRef
  • A review of reports on single-incision laparoscopic surgery for Crohn’s disease
    Kiyoshi Maeda, Hisashi Nagahara, Masatsune Shibutani, Tatsunari Fukuoka, Toru Inoue, Masaichi Ohira
    Surgery Today.2019; 49(5): 361.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the short-term outcomes of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery and conventional multiport surgery in colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    Ji Hoon Kang, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim, Han Deok Kwak, Jae Kyun Ju, Young Jin Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2018; 94(3): 147.     CrossRef
  • The feasibility and short-term clinical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for patients with complex Crohn’s disease
    Kiyoshi Maeda, Hisashi Nagahara, Masatsune Shibutani, Tatsunari Fukuoka, Shigetomi Nakao, Hirokazu Yamagami, Noriko Kamata, Kazuya Muguruma, Hiroaki Tanaka, Takahiro Toyokawa, Kosei Hirakawa, Masaichi Ohira
    Surgery Today.2018; 48(2): 242.     CrossRef
  • Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy for hemodialysis patients with dialysis-related renal tumors
    Kohei Takei, Mutsushi Yamasaki, Satoki Abe, Naoyuki Yamanaka, Shinya Sejiyama, Takahiro Narimatsu, Shinro Hata, Tadamasa Shibuya, Kenichi Hirai, Tadasuke Ando, Toshitaka Shin, Kenichi Mori, Yasuhiro Sumino, Takeo Nomura, Fuminori Sato, Toshiro Terachi, Hi
    Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies.2018; 27(3): 153.     CrossRef
  • Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients With Proximal Transverse Colon Cancer With Situs Inversus Totalis: A Case Report
    Seung-Seop Yeom, Kyung Hwan Kim, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim, Young Jin Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(6): 322.     CrossRef
  • Robot-Assisted Colectomy for Left-Sided Colon Cancer: Comparison of Reduced-Port and Conventional Multi-Port Robotic Surgery
    Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2017; 27(4): 398.     CrossRef
  • Two-port laparoscopic anterior resection through a self-made glove device versus conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparison of short-term surgical results
    Hong Zhang, Yunzhi Ling, Jinchun Cong, Mingming Cui, Dingsheng Liu, Chunsheng Chen
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison between the perioperative results of single‐access and conventional laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer
    Siripong Sirikurnpiboon
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2016; 9(1): 44.     CrossRef
  • Review of 500 single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery cases - Lessons learned
    Deborah S Keller
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(2): 659.     CrossRef
  • Robotic Anterior Resection for Sigmoid Colon Cancer Using Reduced Port Access
    Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2016; 59(3): 245.     CrossRef
  • Pfannenstiel laparoendoscopic reduced‐port radical nephrectomy
    Mutsushi Yamasaki, Toshitaka Shin, Ryuta Sato, Kenichi Hirai, Tomoko Kan, Hiroyuki Fujinami, Kenichi Mori, Yasuhiro Sumino, Takeo Nomura, Fuminori Sato, Hitoshi Masuda, Junji Yonese, Hiromitsu Mimata
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2016; 9(3): 222.     CrossRef
  • SILS v SILS+1: a Case-Matched Comparison for Colorectal Surgery
    Deborah S. Keller, Juan R. Flores-Gonzalez, Jaideep Sandhu, Sergio Ibarra, Nisreen Madhoun, Eric M. Haas
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2015; 19(10): 1875.     CrossRef
  • Reduced Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer
    Byung Chun Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(1): 3.     CrossRef
  • Minimally invasive surgery for superior mesenteric artery syndrome: A case report
    Si-Yuan Yao
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2015; 21(45): 12970.     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP