Annals of Coloproctology

Review

Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Colorectal cancer

Extended lymphadenectomy in locally advanced rectal cancers: a systematic review: Balaji Mahendran, Supriya Balasubramanya, Simone Sebastiani, Sebastian Smolarek; Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(1):3-12. Published online November 17, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00703.0100

3,875 View
158 Download
6 Web of Science
5 Citations

Purpose
The surgical treatment of advanced low rectal cancer remains controversial. Extended lymphadenectomy (EL) is the preferred option in the East, especially in Japan, while neoadjuvant radiotherapy is the treatment of choice in the West. This review was undertaken to review available evidence supporting each of the therapies.
Methods
All studies looking at EL were included in this review. A comprehensive search was conducted as per PRISMA guidelines. Primary outcome was defined as 5-year overall survival, with secondary outcomes including 3-year overall survival, 3- and 5-year disease-free survival, length of operation, and number of complications.
Results
Thirty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. There was no significant publication bias. There was statistically significant difference in 5-year survival for patient who underwent EL (odds ratio, 1.34; 95 confidence interval, 0.09–0.5; P=0.006). There were no differences noted in secondary outcomes except for length of the operations.
Conclusion
There is evidence supporting EL in rectal cancer; however, it is difficult to interpret and not easily transferable to a Western population. Further research is necessary on this important topic.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Performance reporting design in artificial intelligence studies using image-based TNM staging and prognostic parameters in rectal cancer: a systematic review
Minsung Kim, Taeyong Park, Bo Young Oh, Min Jeong Kim, Bum-Joo Cho, Il Tae Son
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(1): 13. CrossRef
Rectal Cancer: Are 12 Lymph Nodes the Limit?
Paweł Mroczkowski, Łukasz Dziki, Tereza Vosikova, Ronny Otto, Anna Merecz-Sadowska, Radosław Zajdel, Karolina Zajdel, Hans Lippert, Olof Jannasch
Cancers.2023; 15(13): 3447. CrossRef
Fluorescence-guided colorectal surgery: applications, clinical results, and protocols
Jin-Min Jung, In Ja Park, Eun Jung Park, Gyung Mo Son
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 252. CrossRef
Advances in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases: A Focus on Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
Youngbae Jeon, Eun Jung Park
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus R0 resection for resectable colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases and low peritoneal cancer index scores: A collaborative observational study from Korea and Japan
Daichi Kitaguchi, Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik, Shoma Sasaki, Yuichiro Tsukada, Masaaki Ito
International Journal of Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef

Original Article

Chemotherapeutic Response and Survival for Patients With an Anal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Low Hemoglobin Levels: Ali Zain Naqvi, Esther Platt, Maki Jitsumura, Martyn Evans, Mark Coleman, Sebastian Smolarek; Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):312-316. Published online December 31, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.10.12

3,562 View
71 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
Anemia is associated with poor treatment results for a variety of cancers. The effect of low hemoglobin levels on long-term outcomes after the treatment of patients with an anal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) remains unclear. For that reason, this study aimed to investigate the effect of anemia on treatment outcomes following chemoradiation for an anal SCC.
Methods
This was a retrospective study of all patients who underwent curative treatment for an anal SCC between 2009 and 2015 at 2 trusts in the United Kingdom. Data were collated from prospectively collected cancer databases and were cross-checked with operating-room records and records in the hospitals’ patient management systems.
Results
We identified 103 patients with a median age of 63 years (range, 36–84 years). The median overall survival was 39 months (range, 9–90 months), and the disease-free survival was 36 months (range, 2–90 months). During the follow-up period, 16.5% patients died and 13.6% patients developed recurrence. Twenty-two people were anemic prior to treatment, with a female preponderance (20 of 22). No differences in disease-free survival (P = 0.74) and overall survival (P = 0.12) were noted between patients with anemia and those with normal hemoglobin levels. On regression the analysis, the combination of anemia, the presence of a defunctioning colostomy, lymph-node involvement and higher tumor stage correlated with poor overall survival.
Conclusion
In this study, anemia did not influence disease-free survival or overall survival. We suggest that the interaction between anemia and survival is more complex than previously demonstrated and potentially reliant on other coexisting factors.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Prognostic and Predictive Clinical and Biological Factors in HPV Malignancies
Shivani Sud, Ashley A. Weiner, Andrew Z. Wang, Gaorav P. Gupta, Colette J. Shen
Seminars in Radiation Oncology.2021; 31(4): 309. CrossRef

Erratum

Corrigendum: Correction of the Fourth Author's Affiliation. Synthetic Versus Biological Mesh-Related Erosion After Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy: A Systematic Review: Andrea Balla, Silvia Quaresima, Sebastian Smolarek, Mostafa Shalaby, Giulia Missori, Pierpaolo Sileri; Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(6):253-253. Published online December 31, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.6.253

4,467 View
27 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Citations

PDF

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

A quantitative study to explore functional outcomes following laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse
O Olatunbode, S Rangarajan, V Russell, YKS Viswanath, A Reddy
The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England.2022; 104(6): 449. CrossRef

Review

Synthetic Versus Biological Mesh-Related Erosion After Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy: A Systematic Review: Andrea Balla, Silvia Quaresima, Sebastian Smolarek, Mostafa Shalaby, Giulia Missori, Pierpaolo Sileri; Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(2):46-51. Published online April 28, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.2.46

7,062 View
136 Download
44 Web of Science
41 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

This review reports the incidence of mesh-related erosion after ventral mesh rectopexy to determine whether any difference exists in the erosion rate between synthetic and biological mesh.

Methods

A systematic search of the MEDLINE and the Ovid databases was conducted to identify suitable articles published between 2004 and 2015. The search strategy capture terms were laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy, laparoscopic anterior rectopexy, robotic ventral rectopexy, and robotic anterior rectopexy.

Results

Eight studies (3,956 patients) were included in this review. Of those patients, 3,517 patients underwent laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) using synthetic mesh and 439 using biological mesh. Sixty-six erosions were observed with synthetic mesh (26 rectal, 32 vaginal, 8 recto-vaginal fistulae) and one (perineal erosion) with biological mesh. The synthetic and the biological mesh-related erosion rates were 1.87% and 0.22%, respectively. The time between rectopexy and diagnosis of mesh erosion ranged from 1.7 to 124 months. No mesh-related mortalities were reported.

Conclusion

The incidence of mesh-related erosion after LVR is low and is more common after the placement of synthetic mesh. The use of biological mesh for LVR seems to be a safer option; however, large, multicenter, randomized, control trials with long follow-ups are required if a definitive answer is to be obtained.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Feasibility and safety of biologic OviTex mesh in ventral mesh rectopexy: a prospective pilot study
M. A. Boom, E. M. van der Schans, N. A. T. Wijffels, P. M. Verheijen, E. C. J. Consten
Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Ventral mesh rectopexy for recurrent rectal prolapse after Altemeier perineal proctosigmoidectomy: feasibility and outcomes
Lukas Schabl, Tracy Hull, Kamil Erozkan, Ali Alipouriani, Kristen A. Ban, Scott R. Steele, Anna R. Spivak
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Treatment of complete rectal prolapse using the TEO® platform (transanal endoscopic operation) – a video vignette
Antonio D'Urso, Alfonso Lapergola, Jacques Marescaux, Didier Mutter, Xavier Serra‐Aracil
Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(4): 820. CrossRef
Now is the time to establish a registry for mesh rectopexy
Yui Kaneko, Corina Behrenbruch, James Keck
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2024; 94(7-8): 1209. CrossRef
Mesh-associated complications in minimally invasive ventral mesh rectopexy: a systematic review
Gabriel Fridolin Hess, Fabio Nocera, Stephanie Taha-Mehlitz, Sebastian Christen, Marco von Strauss Und Torney, Daniel C. Steinemann
Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(12): 7073. CrossRef
Anatomic and functional results of ventral biological mesh rectopexy for posterior pelvic floor disorders
F. Rogier-Mouzelas, F. Drissi, J. Podevin, E. Duchalais, G. Meurette
Journal of Visceral Surgery.2023; 160(3): 188. CrossRef
Building a Multidisciplinary Pelvic Floor Clinic: Why Bother?
Alison Hainsworth, Linda Ferrari, Sachin Malde, Lucia Berry
Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2023; 34(1): 100933. CrossRef
Management of full thickness rectal prolapse
Charlotte M. Rajasingh, Brooke H. Gurland
Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2023; 34(1): 100938. CrossRef
Résultats anatomiques et fonctionnels de la rectopexie ventrale avec renfort par bio-prothèse pour trouble de la statique rectale
F. Rogier-Mouzelas, F. Drissi, J. Podevin, E. Duchalais, G. Meurette
Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale.2023; 160(3): 203. CrossRef
Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Modified Laparoscopic Suture Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse
Rina Takahashi, Tetsuo Yamana, Risa Nishio, Kazuhiro Sakamoto, Shuko Nojiri, Kiichi Sugimoto
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2023; 7(2): 102. CrossRef
Comparing the Outcomes and Complication Rates of Biologic vs Synthetic Meshes in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
Nathan Makarewicz, David Perrault, Ayushi Sharma, Mohammed Shaheen, Jessica Kim, Christian Calderon, Brian Sweeney, Rahim Nazerali
Annals of Plastic Surgery.2023; 90(5): 516. CrossRef
Current diagnostic tools and treatment modalities for rectal prolapse
Mustafa Oruc, Timucin Erol
World Journal of Clinical Cases.2023; 11(16): 3680. CrossRef
Moving from Laparoscopic Synthetic Mesh to Robotic Biological Mesh for Ventral Rectopexy: Results from a Case Series
Farouk Drissi, Fabien Rogier-Mouzelas, Sebastian Fernandez Arias, Juliette Podevin, Guillaume Meurette
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(17): 5751. CrossRef
Robotic mesh rectopexy for rectal prolapse: The Geneva technique—A video vignette
Jeremy Meyer, Emilie Liot, Vaihere Delaune, Alexandre Balaphas, Bruno Roche, Guillaume Meurette, Frédéric Ris
Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(12): 2469. CrossRef
The international variability of surgery for rectal prolapse
Jesse K Kelley, Edward R Hagen, Brooke Gurland, Andrew RL Stevenson, James W Ogilvie
BMJ Surgery, Interventions, & Health Technologies.2023; 5(1): e000198. CrossRef
Trends in the surgical management of rectal prolapse: An Asian experience
Yvonne Ying‐Ru Ng, Emile John Kwong Wei Tan, Cherylin Wan Pei Fu
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2022; 15(1): 110. CrossRef
Mesh-related complications and recurrence after ventral mesh rectopexy with synthetic versus biologic mesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis
E. M. van der Schans, M. A. Boom, M. El Moumni, P. M. Verheijen, I. A. M. J. Broeders, E. C. J. Consten
Techniques in Coloproctology.2022; 26(2): 85. CrossRef
Case series of mesh migration after rectopexy surgery for rectal prolapse
Omar Marghich, Benjamin Benichou, Efoé-Ga Yawod Olivier Amouzou, Alexandre Maubert, Jean Hubert Etienne, Emmanuel Benizri, Mohamed Amine Rahili
Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Mesh erosion into the rectum after laparoscopic posterior rectopexy: A case report
Shun Yamanaka, Tsuyoshi Enomoto, Shoko Moue, Yohei Owada, Yusuke Ohara, Tatsuya Oda
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2022; 95: 107136. CrossRef
Patients’ Perception of Long-term Outcome After Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy; Single Tertiary Center Experience
Sandeep Singh, Keshara Ratnatunga, Roel Bolckmans, Naeem Iqbal, Oliver Jones, Ian Lindsey, Kim Gorissen, Chris Cunningham
Annals of Surgery.2022; 276(5): e459. CrossRef
Laparoscopic posterior rectopexy for complete rectal prolapse
Senthil Kumar Ganapathi, Rajapandian Subbiah, Sathiyamoorthy Rudramurthy, Harish Kakkilaya, Parthasarathi Ramakrishnan, Palanivelu Chinnusamy
Journal of Minimal Access Surgery.2022; 18(2): 295. CrossRef
Polyvinylidene Fluoride Mesh Use in Laparoscopic Ventral Mesh Rectopexy in Patients with Obstructive Defecation Syndrome for the First Time
Mahdi Alemrajabi, Behnam Darabi, Behrouz Banivaheb, Nima Hemmati, Sepideh Jahanian, Mohammad Moradi
Journal of Investigative Surgery.2021; 34(10): 1083. CrossRef
Ventral Rectopexy
Kenneth C. Loh, Konstantin Umanskiy
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2021; 34(01): 062. CrossRef
Thulium laser to endoscopically manage a rectal erosion and intraluminal mesh migration after ventral rectopexy
Lorenzo Dioscoridi, Francesco Pugliese, Camillo Leonardo Bertoglio, Massimiliano Mutignani
BMJ Case Reports.2021; 14(1): e235807. CrossRef
Operationstechniken aus viszeralchirurgischer Sicht
Mia Kim
coloproctology.2021; 43(5): 314. CrossRef
Suture rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy for complete full-thickness rectal prolapse and intussusception: systematic review and meta-analysis
H S Lobb, C C Kearsey, S Ahmed, R Rajaganeshan
BJS Open.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Evaluation of a Novel Absorbable Mesh in a Porcine Model of Abdominal Wall Repair
Alexei S. Mlodinow, Ketan Yerneni, Michelle E. Hasse, Todd Cruikshank, Markian J. Kuzycz, Marco F. Ellis
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery - Global Open.2021; 9(5): e3529. CrossRef
Approaching Combined Rectal and Vaginal Prolapse
Shannon Wallace, Brooke Gurland
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2021; 34(05): 302. CrossRef
Troubles de la statique rectale de l’adulte. Syndrome du prolapsus rectal
G. Lebreton, B. Menahem, A. Alves
EMC - Gastro-entérologie.2021; 38(2): 1. CrossRef
What happens to the biological prosthesis implanted during laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy? – a video vignette
A. Di Leo, J. Andreuccetti
Colorectal Disease.2020; 22(11): 1754. CrossRef
Minimally invasive organ‐preserving approaches in the management of mesh erosion after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy
K. Ratnatunga, S. Singh, R. Bolckmans, S. Goodbrand, K. Gorissen, O. Jones, I. Lindsey, C. Cunningham
Colorectal Disease.2020; 22(11): 1642. CrossRef
Position statement by the Pelvic Floor Society on behalf of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland on the use of mesh in ventral mesh rectopexy
M. A. Mercer‐Jones, S. R. Brown, C. H. Knowles, A. B. Williams
Colorectal Disease.2020; 22(10): 1429. CrossRef
Outcome of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for full-thickness external rectal prolapse: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression analysis of the predictors for recurrence
Sameh Hany Emile, Hossam Elfeki, Mostafa Shalaby, Ahmad Sakr, Pierpaolo Sileri, Steven D. Wexner
Surgical Endoscopy.2019; 33(8): 2444. CrossRef
Ventral rectopexy with biological mesh for recurrent disorders of the posterior pelvic organ compartment
M. Brunner, H. Roth, K. Günther, R. Grützmann, Klaus E. Matzel
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2019; 34(10): 1763. CrossRef
Ventral rectopexy with biological mesh: short-term functional results
M. Brunner, H. Roth, K. Günther, R. Grützmann, K. E. Matzel
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2018; 33(4): 449. CrossRef
Short‐ and long‐term clinical and patient‐reported outcomes following laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy using biological mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective cohort study of 224 consecutive patients
R. McLean, M. Kipling, E. Musgrave, M. Mercer‐Jones
Colorectal Disease.2018; 20(5): 424. CrossRef
Chirurgische Therapie des Rektumprolapses
J. Hardt, P. Kienle
coloproctology.2018; 40(3): 187. CrossRef
Chirurgische Therapie beim Rektumprolaps
A. J. Kroesen
coloproctology.2018; 40(3): 181. CrossRef
A Delorme operation for full‐thickness complete rectal prolapse – a video vignette
W. Omar, H. Elfeki, M. A. Abdel‐Razik, M. Shalaby
Colorectal Disease.2018; 20(12): 1156. CrossRef
Consensus Statement of the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR): management and treatment of complete rectal prolapse
G. Gallo, J. Martellucci, G. Pellino, R. Ghiselli, A. Infantino, F. Pucciani, M. Trompetto
Techniques in Coloproctology.2018; 22(12): 919. CrossRef
Erosion after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy with a biological mesh
M. Shalaby, A. Matarangolo, I. Capuano, G. Petrella, P. Sileri
Techniques in Coloproctology.2017; 21(12): 985. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search