Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Original Articles

Malignant disease,Colorectal cancer,Prognosis,Epidemiology & etiology

Clinicopathologic characteristics and survival of patients with double primary malignancies: breast and colorectal cancer: Hyundo Lee, Hae Won Lee, Eun Jung Park, Jeonghyun Kang, Seung Hyuk Baik; Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(3):197-206. Published online October 18, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00640.0091

4,945 View
170 Download
3 Web of Science
2 Citations

Purpose
This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathologic features and survival in patients with both breast cancer (BrC) and colorectal cancer (CRC).
Methods
Between 1996 and 2019, patients who were diagnosed with both BrC and CRC were evaluated retrospectively. Patients with distant metastasis, palliative resection, and previous cancer histories except for BrCs or CRCs were excluded. Altogether, 105 patients were divided into the B=C group (n=21), B-first group (n=40), and C-first group (n=44) according to the definition of synchronous and metachronous cancers. The clinicopathologic features and overall survival were evaluated.
Results
TNM stages and histologic types were comparable among the 3 groups (P=0.434). The interval of diagnosis was 67.1±40.4 and 59.3±47.2 months in the B- and C-first groups, respectively. The incidence of adjuvant chemotherapy in the B-first group was 57.5%, which was higher than the B=C and C-first groups (P<0.001). The estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki-67, and HER-2 molecular markers were not significantly different among the groups. The overall survival of the B-first group showed lower survival rates than the C-first group (P=0.039). In the logistic regression, HER-2 status (hazard ratio [HR], 11.9; P=0.032) and lymph node metastasis of CRC (HR, 5.8; P=0.036) were prognostic factors affecting overall survival.
Conclusion
B-first group had poorer survival outcomes than the C-first group in patients with the metachronous BrC and CRC. HER2 positivity and CRC lymph node metastasis may be prognostic factors that affect overall survival in these patients. The findings support that a colorectal cancer screening program should be included during BrC surveillance.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Synchronous or metachronous breast and colorectal cancers in younger-than-average-age patients: a case series
Jordyn Silverstein, Francis Wright, Dalila Stanfield, Amy Jo Chien, Jasmine M Wong, John W Park, Amie Blanco, Katherine Van Loon, Chloe E Atreya
The Oncologist.2024; 29(9): e1159. CrossRef
Synchronous Breast and Colorectal Malignant Tumors—A Systematic Review
Cristian Iorga, Cristina Raluca Iorga, Alexandru Grigorescu, Iustinian Bengulescu, Traian Constantin, Victor Strambu
Life.2024; 14(8): 1008. CrossRef

Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgeries for Patients With Colorectal Cancer Who Have Had a Previous Abdominal Surgery: Soeun Park, Jeonghyun Kang, Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee; Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(5):184-191. Published online October 31, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.5.184

6,446 View
74 Download
13 Web of Science
14 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

The impact of previous abdominal surgery (PAS) on surgical outcomes from laparoscopic and robot surgeries is inconclusive. This study aimed to investigate the impact of PAS on perioperative outcomes from laparoscopic and robotic colorectal surgeries.

Methods

From March 2007 to February 2014, a total of 612 and 238 patients underwent laparoscopic and robotic surgeries, respectively. Patients were divided into 3 groups: those who did not have a PAS (NPAS), those who had a major PAS, and those who had a minor PAS. We further divided the patients so that our final groups for analysis were: patients with NPAS (n = 478), major PAS (n = 19), and minor PAS (n = 115) in the laparoscopy group, and patients with NPAS (n = 202) and minor PAS (n = 36) in the robotic surgery group.

Results

In the laparoscopy group, no differences in the conversion rates between the 3 groups were noted (NPAS = 1.0% vs. major PAS = 0% vs. minor PAS = 1.7%, P = 0.701). In the robotic surgery group, the conversion rate did not differ between the NPAS group and the minor PAS group (1.0% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.390). Among the groups, neither the operation time, blood loss, days to soft diet, length of hospital stay, nor complication rate were affected by PAS.

Conclusion

PAS did not jeopardize the perioperative outcomes for either laparoscopic or robotic colorectal surgeries. Therefore, PAS should not be regarded as an absolute contraindication for minimally invasive colorectal surgeries.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in high-risk patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
S. Gahunia, J. Wyatt, S. G. Powell, S. Mahdi, S. Ahmed, K. Altaf
Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of previous abdominal surgery on minimally invasive radical resection of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis
Wenjun Liu, Fan He, Defei Chen, Xiuping Zhang
European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2025; 51(10): 110259. CrossRef
Effect of previous abdominal surgery on robotic-assisted rectal cancer surgery
Davide Ferrari, Tommaso Violante, Himani Bhatt, Ibrahim A. Gomaa, Anne-Lise D. D’Angelo, Kellie L. Mathis, David W. Larson
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 28(4): 513. CrossRef
The impact of previous abdominal surgery on colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery
Xu-Rui Liu, Bing-Lan Zhang, Dong Peng, Fei Liu, Zi-Wei Li, Chun-Yi Wang
Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(4): 1331. CrossRef
Robot‐assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer after low anterior resection: A case report
Shoutarou Watanabe, Hiroaki Kobayashi, Nao Hiroe, Tomohiro Iwasawa, Michio Kosugi, Masayuki Shimizu, Masaru Ishida
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The risk of postoperative complications is higher in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients with previous abdominal surgery: a propensity score matching analysis
Xu-Rui Liu, Fei Liu, Zi-Wei Li, Xiao-Yu Liu, Wei Zhang, Dong Peng
Clinical and Translational Oncology.2023; 25(12): 3471. CrossRef
Pretreatment inflammatory markers predicting treatment outcomes in colorectal cancer
Sanghyun An, Hongjin Shim, Kwangmin Kim, Bora Kim, Hui-Jae Bang, Hyejin Do, Hyang-Rae Lee, Youngwan Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(2): 97. CrossRef
Current status of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer: A review
Won Beom Jung
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2022; 11(2): 56. CrossRef
Conversions related to adhesions in abdominal surgery. Robotic versus laparoscopic approach: A multicentre experience
Marco Milone, Nicola de'Angelis, Nassiba Beghdadi, Francesco Brunetti, Michele Manigrasso, Giuseppe De Simone, Giuseppe Servillo, Sara Vertaldi, Giovanni Domenico De Palma
The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic and laparoscopic liver resection—comparative experiences at a high-volume German academic center
E. Lorenz, J. Arend, M. Franz, M. Rahimli, A. Perrakis, V. Negrini, A. A. Gumbs, R. S. Croner
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2021; 406(3): 753. CrossRef
Robotic versus Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgeries
Anil Heroor, Aysha Khan, Kashish Jain, Akshay Patil, Hitesh Rajendra Singhavi
Indian Journal of Colo-Rectal Surgery.2021; 4(1): 12. CrossRef
Safety and feasibility of repeat laparoscopic colorectal resection: a matched case–control study
Alban Zarzavadjian le Bian, Laurent Genser, Christine Denet, Carlotta Ferretti, Anais Laforest, Jean-Marc Ferraz, Candice Tubbax, Philippe Wind, Brice Gayet, David Fuks
Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(5): 2120. CrossRef
Impact of previous abdominal surgery on robotic-assisted rectal surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score matching study
Ching-Wen Huang, Wei-Chih Su, Tsung-Kun Chang, Cheng-Jen Ma, Tzu-Chieh Yin, Hsiang-Lin Tsai, Po-Jung Chen, Yen-Cheng Chen, Ching-Chun Li, Yi-Chien Hsieh, Jaw-Yuan Wang
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
An individualized laparoscopic‐assisted approach in a patient with a sigmoid tumour and a giant incisional hernia – a video vignette
C. Clancy, M. Flanagan, M. Bughio, M. G. O'Riordain
Colorectal Disease.2019; 21(8): 972. CrossRef

Case Report

Multiple Myeloma Mimics Bone Metastasis From a Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Im-Kyung Kim, Jeonghyun Kang, Yu Ri Kim, Tae Joo Jeon, Seung Hyuk Baik, Seung-Kook Sohn; Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(2):70-73. Published online April 28, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.2.70

6,025 View
44 Download
1 Citations

Abstract PDF

A presumptive diagnosis of bone metastasis can be easily made when a patient with a history of colorectal cancer develops bone lesions that are seen on follow-up imaging. In this case report, we describe a patient whose multiple bone lesions were wrongly attributed to a recurrence of rectal cancer rather than being identified as multiple myeloma lesions. When clinicians detect new, abnormal, bony lesions in a patient with a previous history of cancer, they should consider diseases such as multiple myeloma in their differential diagnosis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Capecitabine/fluorouracil/oxaliplatin

Reactions Weekly.2017; 1661(1): 71. CrossRef

Original Article

Single Center Experience With Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Woo Ram Kim, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(1):16-22. Published online February 28, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.1.16

5,593 View
75 Download
6 Web of Science
4 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) have been proposed for controlling peritoneal seeding metastasis in some kinds of cancers, including those of colorectal origin, but their safety and oncological benefits are subjects of debate. We present our early experience with those procedures.

Methods

Data were retrospectively collected from all patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) and pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) treated using CRS and HIPEC at Yonsei Cancer Center between July 2014 and July 2015. Short-term outcomes and risk factors for postoperative complications were analyzed.

Results

Twenty-three patients with PC (n = 18) and PMP (n = 5) underwent CRS and HIPEC. Median follow-up and age were 2 months and 54 years, respectively. The median peritoneal carcinomatosis index score was 15, and CC0-1 was achieved in 78.3% of all patients. The median operation time and bleeding loss were 590 minutes and 570 mL, respectively. Grade-IIIa/grade-IIIb complications occurred in 4.3% (n = 1)/26.1% (n = 6) of the patients within 30 days postoperatively, and no 30-day mortalities were reported. Factors related to postoperative complications with CRS and HIPEC were number of organ resection (P = 0.013), longer operation time (P < 0.001), and amount of blood loss (P = 0.003). All patients treated with cetuximab for recurred colorectal cancer had grade-III postoperative complication.

Conclusion

Our initial experience with CRS and HIPEC presented about 30% grade-III postoperative complications. Therefore, expert surgeons need to perform those procedures with great caution in selected patients who might benefit from it.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Multisocietal Consensus on the Use of Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC for the Treatment of Diffuse Malignant Peritoneal Mesothelioma: A GRADE Approach for Evidence Evaluation and Recommendation
Shigeki Kusamura, Michela Cinquini, David Morris, Pompiliu Piso, Hedy Kindler, Andreas Brandl, Edward Levine, Olivier Glehen, Vahan Kepenekian, Olivia Sgarbura, Paul H. Sugarbaker, Dario Baratti, Guaglio Marcello, Deraco Marcello
Journal of Surgical Oncology.2025; 131(5): 810. CrossRef
Pharmacologic Effects of Oxaliplatin Instability in Chloride-Containing Carrier Fluids on the Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy to Treat Colorectal Cancer In Vitro and In Vivo
Eun Jung Park, Junhyun Ahn, Sharif Md Abuzar, Kyung Su Park, Sung-Joo Hwang, Seung Hyuk Baik
Annals of Surgical Oncology.2022; 29(13): 8583. CrossRef
Treatment for Peritoneal Metastasis of Patients With Colorectal Cancer
Young Jin Kim, Chang Hyun Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 425. CrossRef
Is Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy a Safe and Effective Procedure for Treating Patients With a Peritoneal Surface Malignancy?
Dong-Guk Park
Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(1): 3. CrossRef

Case Reports

Xanthogranulomatous Appendicitis Mimicking Residual Burkitt's Lymphoma After Chemotherapy: Soomin Nam, Jeonghyun Kang, Sung-Eun Choi, Yu Ri Kim, Seung Hyuk Baik, Seung-Kook Sohn; Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(2):83-86. Published online April 30, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.2.83

5,026 View
43 Download
5 Web of Science
9 Citations

Abstract PDF

The case of a 23-year-old female treated with aggressive high-dose therapy for Burkitt's lymphoma is reported. A positron emission tomography and computed tomography scan after completion of chemotherapy revealed a residual hypermetabolic lesion in the right pelvic cavity. A pelvic magnetic resonance imaging scan showed circumferential wall thickening at the tip of the appendix. A laparoscopic exploration and appendectomy were performed, and a pathologic examination of the resected appendix revealed xanthogranulomatous appendicitis. This is a rare case of a xanthogranulomatous appendicitis mimicking remnant Burkitt's lymphoma after completion of chemotherapy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Xanthogranulomatous appendicitis presenting asymptomatically 3 years after surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: A case report
Nobuhisa Tanioka, Michio Kuwahara, Takashi Sakai, Yuzuko Nokubo, Makoto Hiroi, Toyokazu Akimori
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2024; 120: 109800. CrossRef
Xanthogranulomatous appendicitis
Elina Sor, Igor Mishin
Bulletin of the Academy of Sciences of Moldova. Medical Sciences.2024; 77(3): 265. CrossRef
A case of xanthogranulomatous appendicitis that was difficult to diagnose
Yusaku WATANABE, Shingo SHIOYA, Tetsuhito ARIKIZONO, Syuzou TASHIMA, Toshiyuki CHOSA, Hiroshi SUGITA, Kyouko MIZUKAMI, Kentaro TOKUDOME, Kaoru HIJIKURO, Kouichirou SHIGETA
Choonpa Igaku.2023; 50(2): 121. CrossRef
Focal Xanthogranulomatous Pyelonephritis on FDG PET/CT
Yong Liu, Guansheng Tong, Zhe Wen
Clinical Nuclear Medicine.2022; 47(9): e611. CrossRef
Xanthogranulomatous appendicitis misdiagnosed as a malignant tumor: A case report
Subo Wang, Tingchong Jiang, Xiaoxuan Zhou, Xiaoming Mao
Asian Journal of Surgery.2022; 45(8): 1650. CrossRef
A Case of Laparoscopic Cecectomy for Xanthogranulomatous Appendicitis
Marina ISOKAWA, Aya SATO, Ken IMAIZUMI, Kentaro SATO, Hiroyuki KASAJIMA, Hanae KUSHIBIKI, Norihiko SHIMOYAMA, Kazuaki NAKANISHI
Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association).2022; 83(11): 1948. CrossRef
Xanthogranulomatous appendicitis: A comprehensive literature review
Sami Akbulut, Khaled Demyati, Cemalettin Koc, Adem Tuncer, Emrah Sahin, Mehmet Ozcan, Emine Samdanci
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2021; 13(1): 76. CrossRef
A Case of Xanthogranulomatous Appendicitis That Was Difficult to Differentiate from Appendiceal Mucocele
Hirofumi Doi, Kazuhiro Toyota, Satoshi Hirahara, Yuta Kuhara, Kenji Shirakawa, Tetsuhiro Hara, Hironori Kobayashi, Yoshihiro Sakashita, Motoki Ninomiya, Fumio Shimamoto, Katsunari Miyamoto
The Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery.2021; 54(3): 208. CrossRef
A Case of Xanthogranulomatous Appendicitis
Shoichiro NAKAJO, HoMin KIM, Ryoji NONAKA, Jun KAJIHARA, Masami IMAKITA, Toshikazu ITO, Masahiro TANEMURA
Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association).2019; 80(12): 2233. CrossRef

Colon Stricture After Ischemia Following a Robot-Assisted Ultra-Low Anterior Resection With Coloanal Anastomosis: Dae Ro Lim, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Nam Kyu Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(4):157-162. Published online August 31, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.4.157

7,006 View
52 Download
6 Web of Science
8 Citations

Abstract PDF

Four consecutive cases of a colonic stricture following a da Vinci robot-assisted ultra-low anterior resection (LAR) with coloanal anastomosis and diverting ileostomy for the treatment of rectal cancer are reported. The colonic strictures developed after early proximal colonic ischemia without anastomotic site leakage or disruption. All patients were treated with preoperative chemoradiation therapy. During the postoperative recovery period, patients developed colonic ischemia, presenting with a high, spiking fever, but without any symptoms of peritonitis. Patients were treated with conservative management (antibiotic therapy) and discharged after two weeks when in good condition. Several months after discharge, all four patients developed a long-segment colonic stricture from the anastomosis site to the distal colon. Management of the colon strictures, including the anastomotic site, involved colonic dilation with a Hegar dilator in an outpatient clinic for several months. The ileostomies in three patients could not be closed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Pathophysiology of anastomotic stricture following rectal anastomosis: Insights into mechanisms, risk factors, and preventive strategies
Ahmet Yavuz, Hikmet Pehlevan-Özel, Mesut Tez
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Comment on “Risk Factors for Benign Anastomotic Stenosis After Esophagectomy for Cancer”
Rachana Mehta, Ranjana Sah
Annals of Surgical Oncology.2025; 32(12): 9306. CrossRef
Magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of necrosis of a pulled-through colon segment after abdomino-anal resection of the rectum for cancer
Sofiya A. Myalina, Ksenia I. Paziuk, Tatiana P. Berezovskaya, Alexey A. Nevolskikh, Aleksandr L. Potapov, Sergey A. Ivanov
Digital Diagnostics.2023; 4(1): 61. CrossRef
Prolonged ischemia of the ileum and colon after surgical mucosectomy explains contraction and failure of “mucus free” bladder augmentation
Dániel Urbán, Gabriella Varga, Dániel Érces, Mahmoud Marei Marei, Raimondo Cervellione, David Keene, Anju Goyal, Tamás Cserni
Journal of Pediatric Urology.2022; 18(4): 500.e1. CrossRef
Robotic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Technical Controversies and a Systematic Review on the Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes
Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Seon Hahn Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 351. CrossRef
Surgical specimen extraction via a prophylactic ileostomy procedure: A minimally invasive technique for laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery
Peng Wang, Jian-Wei Liang, Hai-Tao Zhou, Zheng Wang, Zhi-Xiang Zhou
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 24(1): 104. CrossRef
Risk factors including the presence of inflammation at the resection margins for colorectal anastomotic stenosis following surgery for diverticular disease
A. Bressan, L. Marini, M. Michelotto, A. C. Frigo, G. Da Dalt, S. Merigliano, L. Polese
Colorectal Disease.2018; 20(10): 923. CrossRef
Vascular anatomy of inferior mesenteric artery in laparoscopic radical resection with the preservation of left colic artery for rectal cancer
Ke-Xin Wang, Zhi-Qiang Cheng, Zhi Liu, Xiao-Yang Wang, Dong-Song Bi
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2018; 24(32): 3671. CrossRef

Editorial

Is Low-Dose-Rate Endorectal Brachytherapy a New Treatment Method for Locally Advanced Distal Rectal Cancer?: Seung Hyuk Baik; Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(4):115-116. Published online August 31, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.4.115

3,316 View
19 Download

PDF

Original Article

Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for a Tumor-Specific Mesorectal Excision in Patients With Colorectal Cancer: Initial Experience With 20 Consecutive Cases: Sung Uk Bae, Se Jin Baek, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Nam Kyu Kim, Hyuk Hur; Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(1):16-22. Published online February 28, 2015; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.1.16

8,297 View
36 Download
30 Web of Science
26 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

Single-port plus one-port, reduced-port laparoscopic surgery (RPLS) may decrease collisions between laparoscopic instruments and the camera in a narrow, bony, pelvic cavity while maintaining the cosmetic advantages of single-incision laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study is to describe our initial experience with and to assess the feasibility and safety of RPLS for tumor-specific mesorectal excisions (TSMEs) in patients with colorectal cancer.

Methods

Between May 2010 and August 2012, RPLS for TSME was performed in 20 patients with colorectal cancer. A single port with four channels through an umbilical incision and an additional port in the right lower quadrant were used for RPLS.

Results

The median operation time was 231 minutes (range, 160-347 minutes), and the estimated blood loss was 100 mL (range, 50-500 mL). We transected the rectum with one laparoscopic stapler in 17 cases (85%). The median time to soft diet was 4 days (range, 3-6 days), and the length of hospital stay was 7 days (range, 5-45 days). The median total number of lymph nodes harvested was 16 (range, 7-36), and circumferential resection margin involvement was found in 1 case (5%). Seven patients (35%) developed postoperative complications, and no mortalities occurred within 30 days. During the median follow-up period of 20 months (range, 12-40 months), liver metastasis occurred in 1 patient 10 months after surgery, and local recurrence was nonexistent.

Conclusion

RPLS for TSME in patients with colorectal cancer is technically feasible and safe without compromising oncologic safety. However, further studies comparing RPLS with a conventional, laparoscopic low-anterior resection are needed to prove the advantages of the RPLS procedure.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Short-term outcomes of da Vinci SP versus Xi for rectal cancer surgery: a propensity score matching analysis of two tertiary center cohorts
Min Hyun Kim, Songsoo Yang, Yong Sik Yoon, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(1): 162. CrossRef
Efficacy and safety of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer
Zhi-min Liu, Qi-jun Yao, Fengyun Pei, Fang He, Yandong Zhao, Jun Huang
BMC Cancer.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Robot‐Assisted Colectomy for Left‐Sided Colon Cancer: Comparison of da Vinci SP and Single‐Site Platforms
Kyeong Eui Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek, Sung Uk Bae
The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of surgical performance using articulated (ArtiSential®) and conventional instruments for colorectal laparoscopic surgery: A single‐centre, open, before‐and‐after, prospective study
Hye Rim Shin, Heung‐Kwon Oh, Hong‐min Ahn, Tae‐Gyun Lee, Mi Jeoung Choi, Min Hyeong Jo, Anuj Naresh Singhi, Duck‐Woo Kim, Sung‐Bum Kang
Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(12): 2092. CrossRef
Effect of continuous wound infiltration on patients using intravenous patient-controlled analgesia for pain management after reduced-port laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Hyeon Deok Choi, Sung Uk Bae
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 564. CrossRef
Short-term outcomes of da Vinci SP versus Xi for colon cancer surgery: a propensity-score matching analysis of multicenter cohorts
Jin-Min Jung, Young Il Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Songsoo Yang, Min Hyun Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2023; 17(6): 2911. CrossRef
Short-term and long-term outcomes of single-incision plus one-port laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a propensity-matched cohort study with conventional laparoscopic surgery
Mingyi Wu, Hao Wang, Xuehua Zhang, Jiaolong Shi, Xiaoliang Lan, Tingyu Mou, Yanan Wang
BMC Gastroenterology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Effects of Sevoflurane versus Propofol on Endogenous Nitric Oxide Metabolism during Laparoscopic Surgery
Ning Wang, Jing Zhang, Ruiling Zhao, Bin Zhao, Yongzhang Li, Xiaoqing Zhang, Peng Liu, Yang Gao
Journal of Healthcare Engineering.2021; 2021: 1. CrossRef
Reduced port versus open right hemicolectomy for colorectal cancer: a retrospective comparison study of two centers
Peter Tschann, Gerald Seitinger, Daniel Lechner, Stephanie Adler, Benedikt Feurstein, Paolo N. C. Girotti, Theresa Schmölzer, Philipp Szeverinski, Felix Aigner, Ingmar Königsrainer
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(7): 1469. CrossRef
Reduced-Port Robotic Right Colectomy with Intracorporeal Anastomosis for Right-Sided Colon Cancer Using the da Vinci Single-Site® Platform: A Pilot Case Series Study
Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
Annals of Robotic and Innovative Surgery.2021; 2(2): 31. CrossRef
Short‐ And medium‐term outcomes of reduced‐port laparoscopic surgery in elderly patients with upper rectal cancer: A retrospective cohort study
Huawen Wu, Zhijian Zheng, Lewei Xu, Yingying Wu, Ziyi Guan, Wenhuan Li, Guofu Chen
Cancer Medicine.2020; 9(15): 5320. CrossRef
Laparoscopic resection of retroperitoneal paraganglioma behind the Spiegel lobe in a kyphotic patient: A rare case report
Hisataka Ogawa, Shin Nakahira, Tomoya Kishimoto, Kazuya Kato, Makoto Hasegawa, Keisuke Oyama, Takayuki Tou, Ryosuke Maki, Hoshi Himura, Hidemi Nishi, Nobuyoshi Ohhara, Jota Mikami, Yoichi Makari, Ken Nakata, Masaki Tsujie, Junya Fujita, Hiroki Ohzato
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2019; 12(3): 344. CrossRef
A review of reports on single-incision laparoscopic surgery for Crohn’s disease
Kiyoshi Maeda, Hisashi Nagahara, Masatsune Shibutani, Tatsunari Fukuoka, Toru Inoue, Masaichi Ohira
Surgery Today.2019; 49(5): 361. CrossRef
Comparison of the short-term outcomes of reduced-port laparoscopic surgery and conventional multiport surgery in colon cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
Ji Hoon Kang, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim, Han Deok Kwak, Jae Kyun Ju, Young Jin Kim
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2018; 94(3): 147. CrossRef
The feasibility and short-term clinical outcomes of single-incision laparoscopic surgery for patients with complex Crohn’s disease
Kiyoshi Maeda, Hisashi Nagahara, Masatsune Shibutani, Tatsunari Fukuoka, Shigetomi Nakao, Hirokazu Yamagami, Noriko Kamata, Kazuya Muguruma, Hiroaki Tanaka, Takahiro Toyokawa, Kosei Hirakawa, Masaichi Ohira
Surgery Today.2018; 48(2): 242. CrossRef
Laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy for hemodialysis patients with dialysis-related renal tumors
Kohei Takei, Mutsushi Yamasaki, Satoki Abe, Naoyuki Yamanaka, Shinya Sejiyama, Takahiro Narimatsu, Shinro Hata, Tadamasa Shibuya, Kenichi Hirai, Tadasuke Ando, Toshitaka Shin, Kenichi Mori, Yasuhiro Sumino, Takeo Nomura, Fuminori Sato, Toshiro Terachi, Hi
Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies.2018; 27(3): 153. CrossRef
Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients With Proximal Transverse Colon Cancer With Situs Inversus Totalis: A Case Report
Seung-Seop Yeom, Kyung Hwan Kim, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim, Young Jin Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(6): 322. CrossRef
Robot-Assisted Colectomy for Left-Sided Colon Cancer: Comparison of Reduced-Port and Conventional Multi-Port Robotic Surgery
Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2017; 27(4): 398. CrossRef
Two-port laparoscopic anterior resection through a self-made glove device versus conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparison of short-term surgical results
Hong Zhang, Yunzhi Ling, Jinchun Cong, Mingming Cui, Dingsheng Liu, Chunsheng Chen
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison between the perioperative results of single‐access and conventional laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer
Siripong Sirikurnpiboon
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2016; 9(1): 44. CrossRef
Review of 500 single incision laparoscopic colorectal surgery cases - Lessons learned
Deborah S Keller
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(2): 659. CrossRef
Robotic Anterior Resection for Sigmoid Colon Cancer Using Reduced Port Access
Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2016; 59(3): 245. CrossRef
Pfannenstiel laparoendoscopic reduced‐port radical nephrectomy
Mutsushi Yamasaki, Toshitaka Shin, Ryuta Sato, Kenichi Hirai, Tomoko Kan, Hiroyuki Fujinami, Kenichi Mori, Yasuhiro Sumino, Takeo Nomura, Fuminori Sato, Hitoshi Masuda, Junji Yonese, Hiromitsu Mimata
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2016; 9(3): 222. CrossRef
SILS v SILS+1: a Case-Matched Comparison for Colorectal Surgery
Deborah S. Keller, Juan R. Flores-Gonzalez, Jaideep Sandhu, Sergio Ibarra, Nisreen Madhoun, Eric M. Haas
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2015; 19(10): 1875. CrossRef
Reduced Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer
Byung Chun Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(1): 3. CrossRef
Minimally invasive surgery for superior mesenteric artery syndrome: A case report
Si-Yuan Yao
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2015; 21(45): 12970. CrossRef

Case Report

Perianal Paget's Disease: Chang Woo Kim, Yon Hee Kim, Min Soo Cho, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Nam Kyu Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(5):241-244. Published online October 28, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.5.241

5,821 View
77 Download
7 Web of Science
10 Citations

Abstract PDF

The incidence of extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD) is very low. An 84-year-old Korean man was treated with topical and oral medications at a local dermatologic clinic for a year, but the symptoms did not improve. He visited Severance Hospital and underwent a perianal skin biopsy and was finally diagnosed with EMPD. The authors performed a wide local excision according to a 1-cm margin around the lesion. For the skin and the soft tissue defects, bilateral inferior gluteal artery perforator flap transpositions were performed. The size of the lesion was 14 cm² × 9 cm², and the lateral and the basal margins were all disease free.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Vulvar Adenocarcinoma With Pagetoid Spread: A Case Report
Kazuaki Nishimura, Seiji Kagami, Haruka Kajio, Tamaki Wada, Naoyuki Toki, Kiyoshi Yoshino
Cancer Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Rectal Adenocarcinoma With Pagetoid Spread: A Novel Entity
Lefika Bathobakae, Pasha Shenasan, Aakash Trivedi, Ruhin Yuridullah, Sohail Qayyum, Abraham El-Sedfy, Hirotada Akiho
Case Reports in Gastrointestinal Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Perianal Paget’s Disease; Surgery and Non-surgical Interventions, Untreated Patient: a Report of Two Cases
Ümit Özdemir, Mustafa Salış, İlter Özer, Bülent Ünal
Indian Journal of Surgery.2023; 85(1): 169. CrossRef
Perianal paget’s disease: A case report
Hernández Pilar Navajas, Delgado Teresa Valdés, Aguado Jesús Machuca, González-Cámpora Ricardo, Arias Federico Argüelles
Archives of Clinical Gastroenterology.2022; 8(3): 050. CrossRef
Perianal Paget's disease
Pilar Navajas Hernández, Teresa Valdés Delgado , Jesús Machuca Aguado, Ricardo González-Cámpora, Federico Argüelles Arias
Revista Española de Enfermedades Digestivas.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Enfermedad de Paget perianal
Mireia Merichal Resina, Carlos Cerdan Santacruz, Enrique Sierra Grañón, Jordi Antoni Tarragona Foradada, Jorge Juan Olsina Kissler
Cirugía Española.2019; 97(3): 179. CrossRef
Perianal Paget Disease
Mireia Merichal Resina, Carlos Cerdan Santacruz, Enrique Sierra Grañón, Jordi Antoni Tarragona Foradada, Jorge Juan Olsina Kissler
Cirugía Española (English Edition).2019; 97(3): 179. CrossRef
Enfermedad de Paget extramamaria de la región perianal, reporte de caso
Lucía Giraldo Mordecay, Joanna Cajamarca Rueda, Edgar Olmos Olmos, Jenny Gonzalez Arboleda
Piel.2017; 32(3): 178. CrossRef
Bilateral V-Y flap for a perianal basal cell carcinoma: A case report
José P. Rivera-Chavarría, Francisco Vargas-Villalobos, Silvia Riggioni-Víquez
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2016; 24: 153. CrossRef
Tumours and inflammatory lesions of the anal canal and perianal skin revisited: an update and practical approach
Heather Dawson, Stefano Serra
Journal of Clinical Pathology.2015; 68(12): 971. CrossRef

Original Article

Safety and Feasibility of a Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Resection in Elderly Patients: Duck Hyoun Jeong, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Nam Kyu Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(1):22-27. Published online February 28, 2013; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.1.22

5,821 View
35 Download
21 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

The aim of this study is to assess the effects of age on the short-term outcomes of a laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer in elderly (≥75 years old), as compared with younger (<75 years old), patients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer between January 2007 and December 2009 was performed. There were two groups: age <75 years old (group A) and age ≥75 years old (group B). The perioperative outcomes between group A and group B were compared.

Results

The study included 824 patients in group A and 92 patients in group B. The body mass index (BMI) and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score were significantly different between group B and group A (BMI: 22.5 vs. 23.5, P = 0.002; ASA score: 1.88 vs. 1.48, P = 0.001). Mean operating times were similar between the groups (325.4 minutes vs. 351.6 minutes, P = 0.07). We observed a higher overall complication rate in group B than in group A (12.0% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.047), but the number of severe complications of Accordion Severity Classification ≥3 (those that required an invasive procedure) was not significantly different between the two groups (6.5% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.142). There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay (13.0 days vs. 12.0 days, P = 0.053).

Conclusion

Although the elderly patients had a significantly higher overall postoperative complication rate, no significant difference was seen in either the number of severe complications of Accordion Severity Classification ≥3 or in the length of hospital stay. A laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection in elderly patients, especially those aged 75 years or older, is safe and feasible.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Evaluation of Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection Among Elderly Individuals With Colorectal Malignancy: A Single-center Retrospective Analysis
Yanru Zhang, Tufeng Chen, Xiaofeng Yang, Yiquan Li, Purun Lei
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2024; 34(3): 281. CrossRef
Risk Factors for Postoperative Paralytic Ileus in Advanced-age Patients after Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 124 Consecutive Patients
Takaaki Fujimoto, Tatsuya Manabe, Kumpei Yukimoto, Yasuhiro Tsuru, Hiroshi Kitagawa, Keiichiro Okuyama, Shin Takesue, Keita Kai, Hirokazu Noshiro
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2023; 7(1): 30. CrossRef
Laparoscopic rectal cancer resection yields comparable clinical and oncological results with shorter hospital stay compared to open access: a 5-year national cohort
Elisabeth Myrseth, Petter Fosse Gjessing, Linn Såve Nymo, Hartwig Kørner, Jan Terje Kvaløy, Stig Norderval
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Effect of intraoperative blood loss on postoperative complications and prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer: A meta‑analysis
Zi-Wei Li, Xin-Peng Shu, Ze-Lin Wen, Fei Liu, Xu-Rui Liu, Quan Lv, Xiao-Yu Liu, Wei Zhang, Dong Peng
Biomedical Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study
Elisabeth Myrseth, Linn Såve Nymo, Petter Fosse Gjessing, Hartwig Kørner, Jan Terje Kvaløy, Stig Norderval
Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(5): 3574. CrossRef
Age and comorbidities do not affect short-term outcomes after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection in elderly patients. A multi-institutional cohort study in 287 patients
Roberto Peltrini, Nicola Imperatore, Filippo Carannante, Diego Cuccurullo, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo, Umberto Bracale, Marco Caricato, Francesco Corcione
Updates in Surgery.2021; 73(2): 527. CrossRef
Perioperative and oncologic outcomes in young and octogenarian patients with colorectal cancer: a comparison at the extremes
Dedrick Kok Hong Chan, Sze Wai Leong, Christopher Hang Liang Keh
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2021; 406(7): 2399. CrossRef
Decreasing Postoperative Pulmonary Complication Following Laparoscopic Surgery in Elderly Individuals with Colorectal Cancer: A Competing Risk Analysis in a Propensity Score–Weighted Cohort Study
Yih-Jong Chern, Jeng-Fu You, Ching-Chung Cheng, Jing-Rong Jhuang, Chien-Yuh Yeh, Pao-Shiu Hsieh, Wen-Sy Tsai, Chun-Kai Liao, Yu-Jen Hsu
Cancers.2021; 14(1): 131. CrossRef
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly aged over 80 years old versus non-elderly: a retrospective cohort study
Yoshitake Ueda, Norio Shiraishi, Takahide Kawasaki, Tomonori Akagi, Shigeo Ninomiya, Hidefumi Shiroshita, Tsuyoshi Etoh, Masafumi Inomata
BMC Geriatrics.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly versus non-elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Nobuaki Hoshino, Yudai Fukui, Koya Hida, Yoshiharu Sakai
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2019; 34(3): 377. CrossRef
Outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for pT3/pT4 colorectal cancer in young vs. old patients
Gabriele Bellio, Marina Troian, Arianna Pasquali, Nicolò de Manzini
Minerva Chirurgica.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Long-term outcomes of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients
Yoshifumi Takahashi, Ken-ichi Mizuno, Kazuya Takahashi, Hiroki Sato, Satoru Hashimoto, Manabu Takeuchi, Masaaki Kobayashi, Junji Yokoyama, Yuichi Sato, Shuji Terai
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2017; 32(4): 567. CrossRef
Results of surgical treatment of colorectal cancer in nonagenarian patients
Arthur Manoel Braga de Albuquerque Gomes, Fábio Lopes de Queiroz, Rodrigo de Almeida Paiva
Journal of Coloproctology.2017; 37(04): 285. CrossRef
Evaluation of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients aged over 75 years old: a multi-institutional study (YSURG1401)
Keisuke Kazama, Toru Aoyama, Tsutomu Hayashi, Takanobu Yamada, Masakatsu Numata, Shinya Amano, Mariko Kamiya, Tsutomu Sato, Takaki Yoshikawa, Manabu Shiozawa, Takashi Oshima, Norio Yukawa, Yasushi Rino, Munetaka Masuda
BMC Surgery.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiation in Elderly Patients
Je-Min Choi, Seung-Hun Lee, Seung-Hyun Lee, Byung-Kwon Ahn
The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2017; 20(3): 108. CrossRef
Elderly patients have more infectious complications following laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery
C. L. Kvasnovsky, K. Adams, M. Sideris, J. Laycock, A. K. Haji, A. Haq, J. Nunoo‐Mensah, S. Papagrigoriadis
Colorectal Disease.2016; 18(1): 94. CrossRef
Laparoscopic surgery for patients with colorectal cancer produces better short‐term outcomes with similar survival outcomes in elderly patients compared to open surgery
Soo Yun Moon, Sohee Kim, Soo Young Lee, Eon Chul Han, Sung‐Bum Kang, Seung‐Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park, Jae Hwan Oh
Cancer Medicine.2016; 5(6): 1047. CrossRef
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly: A prospective cohort study
Katsuji Tokuhara, Kazuyoshi Nakatani, Yosuke Ueyama, Kazuhiko Yoshioka, Masanori Kon
International Journal of Surgery.2016; 27: 66. CrossRef
Impact of intraoperative blood loss on morbidity and survival after radical surgery for colorectal cancer patients aged 80 years or older
Ryosuke Okamura, Koya Hida, Suguru Hasegawa, Yoshiharu Sakai, Madoka Hamada, Masayoshi Yasui, Takao Hinoi, Masahiko Watanabe
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2016; 31(2): 327. CrossRef
Is laparoscopic surgery really effective for the treatment of colon and rectal cancer in very elderly over 80 years old? A prospective multicentric case–control assessment
Francesco Roscio, Luigi Boni, Federico Clerici, Paolo Frattini, Elisa Cassinotti, Ildo Scandroglio
Surgical Endoscopy.2016; 30(10): 4372. CrossRef
Age Over 80 is a Possible Risk Factor for Postoperative Morbidity After a Laparoscopic Resection of Colorectal Cancer
Taekhyun Kang, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun, Won Kon Han, Kyung Uk Jung
Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(6): 228. CrossRef

Review

A Comprehensive Review of Inflammatory Bowel Disease Focusing on Surgical Management: Seung Hyuk Baik, Won Ho Kim; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(3):121-131. Published online June 30, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.3.121

6,986 View
56 Download
5 Citations

Abstract PDF

The two main diseases of inflammatory bowel disease are Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. The pathogenesis of inflammatory disease is that abnormal intestinal inflammations occur in genetically susceptible individuals according to various environmental factors. The consequent process results in inflammatory bowel disease. Medical treatment consists of the induction of remission in the acute phase of the disease and the maintenance of remission. Patients with Crohn's disease finally need surgical treatment in 70% of the cases. The main surgical options for Crohn's disease are divided into two surgical procedures. The first is strictureplasty, which can prevent short bowel syndrome. The second is resection of the involved intestinal segment. Simultaneous medico-surgical treatment can be a good treatment strategy. Ulcerative colitis is a diffuse nonspecific inflammatory disease that involves the colon and the rectum. Patients with ulcerative colitis need surgical treatment in 30% of the cases despite proper medical treatment. The reasons for surgical treatment are various, from life-threatening complications to growth retardation. The total proctocolectomy (TPC) with an ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the most common procedure for the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. Medical treatment for ulcerative colitis after a TPC with an IPAA is usually not necessary.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Current Approaches to Ulcerative Colitis Management: A Comprehensive Overview of Methodologies and Treatments
Aman Rawat, Richa Srivastava
Infectious Disorders - Drug Targets.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Epithelioid Hemangioendothelioma of the Bowel in Crohn’s Disease: The First Reported Case
Smiljana Spasic, Iva Brcic, Rochelle Freire, Monica T. Garcia-Buitrago, Andrew E. Rosenberg
International Journal of Surgical Pathology.2019; 27(4): 423. CrossRef
Extraintestinal Manifestations in Vedolizumab and Anti-TNF-Treated Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Marla C Dubinsky, Raymond K Cross, William J Sandborn, Millie Long, Xue Song, Nianwen Shi, Yao Ding, Samantha Eichner, Brandee Pappalardo, Arijit Ganguli, Anthony Wang
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2018; 24(9): 1876. CrossRef
Pneumoperitoneum, pneumoretroperitoneum, pneumomediastinum and extensive subcutaneous emphysema in a patient with ulcerative colitis: A case report
Usman T. Siddiqui, Hira Shahzad, Asad Jamil Raja
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2015; 17: 12. CrossRef
Risk Factors for Repeat Abdominal Surgery in Patients with Crohn's Disease
Young Jin Kim
Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2012; 28(4): 175. CrossRef

Original Article

Oncologic Outcomes of a Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer: Results of a 3-Year Follow-up: Jung Hoon Cho, Dae Ro Lim, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(1):42-48. Published online February 29, 2012; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.42

7,589 View
49 Download
8 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

The purpose of the study is to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of a laparoscopic-assisted right hemicolectomy for the treatment of colon cancer and compare the results with those of previous randomized trials.

Methods

From June 2006, to December 2008, 156 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with a curative intent for colon cancer were evaluated. The clinicopatholgic outcomes and the oncologic outcomes were evaluated retrospectively by using electronic medical records.

Results

There were 84 male patients and 72 female patients. The mean possible length of stay was 7.0 ± 1.5 days (range, 4 to 12 days). The conversion rate was 3.2%. The total number of complications was 30 (19.2%). Anastomotic leakage was not noted. There was no mortality within 30 days. The 3-year overall survival rate of all stages was 93.3%. The 3-year overall survival rates according to stages were 100% in stage I, 97.3% in stage II, and 84.8% in stage III. The 3-year disease-free survival rate of all stages was 86.1%. The 3-year disease-free survival rates according to stage were 96.2% in stage I, 90.3% in stage II, and 75.6% in stage III. The mean follow-up period was 36.3 (3 to 60) months.

Conclusion

A laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for the treatment of colon cancer is technically feasible and safe to perform in terms of oncologic outcomes. The present data support previously reported randomized trials.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Short-term outcomes and the learning curve for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy using the ArtiSential: a multicenter pooled analysis
Seijong Kim, Jaeim Lee, Heung-Kwon Oh, Dae Hee Pyo, Yoon Suk Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Dong Hwan Bae, Byung Soh Min, Chang Hyun Kim, Jung Wook Huh
Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(5): 2931. CrossRef
Comparison of outcome and costs of robotic and laparoscopic right hemicolectomies
Nima Ahmadi, Isabella Mor, Ross Warner
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2022; 16(2): 429. CrossRef
Is Laparoscopic Complete Mesocolic Excision and Central Vascular Ligation Really Necessary for All Patients With Right-Sided Colon Cancer?
Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Yoon Suk Lee, Bong-Hyeon Kye, Hyeon-Min Cho, Je-Ho Jang, Chang-Nam Kim, Kil Yeon Lee, Suk-Hwan Lee, Jun-Gi Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 434. CrossRef
Oncologic Outcomes of Self-Expandable Metallic Stent as a Bridge to Surgery and Safety and Feasibility of Minimally Invasive Surgery for Acute Malignant Colonic Obstruction
Seung Yoon Yang, Youn Young Park, Yoon Dae Han, Min Soo Cho, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
Annals of Surgical Oncology.2019; 26(9): 2787. CrossRef
Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches for total abdominal colectomy
Zhobin Moghadamyeghaneh, Mark H. Hanna, Joseph C. Carmichael, Alessio Pigazzi, Michael J. Stamos, Steven Mills
Surgical Endoscopy.2016; 30(7): 2792. CrossRef
Preoperative prediction of conversion from laparoscopic rectal resection to open surgery: a clinical study of conversion scoring of laparoscopic rectal resection to open surgery
Guang-Dong Zhang, Xu-Ting Zhi, Jian-Li Zhang, Guang-Bo Bu, Gang Ma, Kai-Lei Wang
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2015; 30(9): 1209. CrossRef
Feasibility and safety of laparoscopic resection following stent insertion for obstructing left-sided colon cancer
Seoung Yoon Rho, Sung Uk Bae, Se Jin Baek, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
Journal of the Korean Surgical Society.2013; 85(6): 290. CrossRef
Totally Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy with Intracorporeal Anastomosis is a Technically and Oncologically Safe Procedure
V. N. N. Kornmann, J. Hagendoorn, S.van Koeverden, B.van Ramshorst, A. B. Smits
Acta Chirurgica Belgica.2013; 113(6): 439. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search