Benign proctology,Surgical technique
- Lithotomy versus prone position for perianal surgery: a randomized controlled trial
-
Pankaj Kumar, Tushar S. Mishra, Siddhant Sarthak, Prakash Kumar Sasmal
-
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(2):117-123. Published online June 7, 2021
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.12.16
-
-
9,202
View
-
237
Download
-
8
Web of Science
-
9
Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
Studies objectively comparing lithotomy and prone positions regarding surgeon comfort, ergonomics, patient comfort, and position related complications are scarce.
Methods
The patients posted for surgery of either fistula in ano, hemorrhoids, or were included in this study. Subjective Mental Effort Questionnaire (SMEQ) and Local Experienced Discomfort (LED) scale were used to score the level of mental and physical stress among the operating surgeon, assistants, and the scrub nurse. Other parameters studied were the exposure of the operative site, patient comfort level, and position-related complications.
Results
Thirty patients were operated in each position. Mean±standard deviation of jackknife prone vs. lithotomy surgeon SMEQ score (15.6±10.4 vs. 107.0±11.5, P<0.05) and LED score (1.8±1.5 vs. 6.7±0.5, P<0.05) were found to be statistically significant. Prone vs. lithotomy assistant SMEQ score (29.1±13.1 vs. 100.6±8.7, P<0.05) and LED score (4.6±1.1 vs. 7.4±0.8, P<0.05) were also found to be statistically significant. SMEQ (10.0±0.0 vs. 20.6±2.5, P<0.05) and LED scores (1.1±0.3 vs. 3.3±0.5, P<0.05) of scrub nurses and LED scores (2.5±0.5 vs. 6.3±0.7, P<0.05) of patients were also statistically significant. Exposure of the operative site was significantly better in the prone position (5.0 vs. 2.1, P<0.05).
Conclusion
Significantly better SMEQ, LED, and exposure score suggests the superiority of jackknife prone position over the lithotomy in terms of significantly less mental and physical stress to the operating surgeon, assistant, and scrub nurse; better ergonomics, and excellent exposure.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by

- A scoping review of participant reported outcome measures assessed during live and simulated surgical procedures
Aaron K. Budden, Sophia Song, Amanda Henry, Claire E. Wakefield, Jason A. Abbott
The American Journal of Surgery.2025; 240: 116131. CrossRef - A comparative study of prone split-leg position and lithotomy position in posterior uterine myomectomy by transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery
Yayu Zhou, Yonghong Lin, Dingyu Xu, Li He, Lu Huang
BMC Women's Health.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Latest Research Trends on the Management of Hemorrhoids
Sung Il Kang
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2025; 9(2): 179. CrossRef - A scoping review of cognitive load assessment tools suitable for clinicians performing REBOA
Codey Simmons, Robbie Lendrum, Zane Perkins, Gareth Grier, Max Marsden
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in myomectomy: a novel minimally invasive technique review
Liufeng Xu, Jiaying Tao, Jigang Jia, Yonghong Lin, Li He
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - Jackknife versus Lithotomy Position for Hemorrhoidectomy Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Sina Ghasemi, Behzad Imani, Alireza Jafarkhani, Ashkan Karimi, Ali Yamini
Scientific Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences.2024; 29(5): 76. CrossRef - A Randomized Controlled Comparative Study of the Three Over-Bed Techniques for Positioning and Repositioning the Lithotomy Position While Using Stirrups
Ling-Ling Zhang, Zhi-Fang Luo, Guang-Jing Yang
Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare.2023; Volume 16: 4255. CrossRef - Transvaginal repair of vesicouterine fistulae: our experience of three cases
Mingxin Cao, Junlong Zhang, Yu Chen, Yueyou Liang
International Urogynecology Journal.2022; 33(3): 737. CrossRef - Human factors in pelvic surgery
Matthew M. Symer, Deborah S. Keller
European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022; 48(11): 2346. CrossRef