Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
7 "Sung Ryol Lee"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Display
Original Articles
Colorectal cancer
Short- and long-term outcomes of subtotal/total colectomy in the management of obstructive left colon cancer
Jung Tak Son, Yong Bog Kim, Hyung Ook Kim, Chungki Min, Yongjun Park, Sung Ryol Lee, Kyung Uk Jung, Hungdai Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(3):260-266.   Published online May 25, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00101.0014
  • 7,800 View
  • 191 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Surgical management of obstructive left colon cancer (OLCC) is still a matter of debate. The classic Hartmann procedure (HP) has a disadvantage that requires a second major operation. Subtotal colectomy/total abdominal colectomy (STC/TC) with ileosigmoid or ileorectal anastomosis is proposed as an alternative procedure to avoid stoma and anastomotic leakage. However, doubts about morbidity and functional outcome and lack of long-term outcomes have made surgeons hesitate to perform this procedure. Therefore, this trial was designed to provide data for morbidity, functional outcomes, and long-term outcomes of STC/TC.
Methods
This study retrospectively analyzed consecutive cases of OLCC that were treated by STC/TC between January 2000 and November 2020 at a single tertiary referral center. Perioperative outcomes and long-term outcomes of STC/TC were analyzed.
Results
Twenty-five descending colon cancer (45.5%) and 30 sigmoid colon cancer cases (54.5%) were enrolled in this study. Postoperative complications occurred in 12 patients. The majority complication was postoperative ileus (10 of 12). Anastomotic leakage and perioperative mortality were not observed. At 6 to 12 weeks after the surgery, the median frequency of defecation was twice per day (interquartile range, 1–3 times per day). Eight patients (14.5%) required medication during this period, but only 3 of 8 patients required medication after 1 year. The 3-year disease-free survival was 72.7% and 3-year overall survival was 86.7%.
Conclusion
The risk of anastomotic leakage is low after STC/TC. Functional and long-term outcomes are also acceptable. Therefore, STC/TC for OLCC is a safe, 1-stage procedure that does not require diverting stoma.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Controversial issues of colon stenting in case of tumor obstructive intestinal obstruction: surgical and oncological aspects
    S.A. Aliyev, E.S. Aliyev, T.K. Aliyev
    Endoscopic Surgery.2025; 31(2): 65.     CrossRef
  • The Safety of Primary Anastomosis Without Protective Stoma in Emergency Left Colon Surgery: A Meta-Analysis
    Zhiyan Wang, Wentao Sheng, Senjie Dai, Xuanzhou Li, Guojian Lin, Xiaohong Kang
    Journal of Investigative Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Ileus After Colectomy in the Modern Era: A Population-Based Analysis
    Grace M. Crouch, Samantha Hendren, Kara K. Brockhaus, Wenjing Weng, Jami L. Boyd, Cheryl Rocker, Robert K. Cleary
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2025; 68(8): 1001.     CrossRef
  • Influence of the type of anatomic resection on anastomotic leak after surgery for colon cancer
    Suat Chin Ng, Andrew McCombie, Frank Frizelle, Tim Eglinton
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2024; 94(3): 424.     CrossRef
  • Complete Obstruction, a Real Risk Factor: A Comprehensive Study on Obstruction in Stage IIA Colon Cancer With Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Soo Young Oh, Chan Wook Kim, Seonok Kim, Min Hyun Kim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2024; 23(2): 135.     CrossRef
  • Can we use colon stenting in accelerated recovery programs for surgical treatment colon cancer complicated by obstructive intestinal obstruction? A literature review
    Saday A. Aliyev, Emil S. Aliyev
    Russian Journal of Oncology.2024; 29(2): 130.     CrossRef
Benign proctology,Rare disease & stoma,Surgical technique
Comparison of blowhole colostomy and loop ostomy for palliation of acute malignant colonic obstruction
Yongjun Park, Dong Uk Choi, Hyung Ook Kim, Yong Bog Kim, Chungki Min, Jung Tack Son, Sung Ryol Lee, Kyung Uk Jung, Hungdai Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(4):319-326.   Published online March 7, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00682.0097
  • 12,568 View
  • 275 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Surgery to create a stoma for decompression might be required for unresectable stage IV cancer patients with complete colonic obstruction. The aim of this study was to compare the results of blowhole colostomy with those of loop ostomy.
Methods
Palliative ileostomy or colostomy procedures performed at a single center between January 2011 and October 2020, were analyzed retrospectively. Fifty-nine patients were identified during this period. The demographic characteristics and outcomes between the blowhole colostomy group (n=24) and the loop ostomy group (n=35) were compared.
Results
The median operative time tended to be shorter in the blowhole colostomy group (52.5 minutes; interquartile range [IQR], 43–65) than in the loop ostomy group (60 minutes; IQR, 40–107), but the difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.162). The median length of hospital stay was significantly shorter with blowhole colostomy (blowhole, 13 days [IQR, 9–23]; loop, 21 days [IQR, 14–37]; P=0.013). Mean cecum diameter was significantly larger in the blowhole group than in the loop group (8.83±1.91 cm vs. 6.78±2.36 cm, P=0.001), and the emergency operation rate was higher in the blowhole group than in the loop group (22 of 24 [91.7%] vs. 23 of 35 [65.7%], P=0.021).
Conclusion
In surgical emergencies, diverting a blowhole colostomy can be safe and effective for palliative management of colonic obstruction in patients with end-stage cancer and might reduce the operative time in emergent situations.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A Last Resort: Dacron Vascular Graft Prosthesis for Management of a Blowhole Colostomy
    Brittney A. Ehrlich, Maria C. Unuvar, Justin M. Orenich, Rebecca L. Hoffman
    The American Surgeon™.2025; 91(2): 303.     CrossRef
  • Preventing Anastomotic Leakage, a Devastating Complication of Colorectal Surgery
    Hyun Gu Lee
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Stoma-Related Complications: A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review
    Zalán Benedek, Loránd Kocsis, Orsolya Bauer, Nicolae Suciu, Sorin Sorlea, Călin Crăciun, Rareș Georgescu, Marius Florin Coroș
    Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine.2022; 7(2): 31.     CrossRef
Benign GI diease
Routine Intraoperative Bacterial Culture May Be Needed in Complicated Appendicitis
Jung Tack Son, Gue Chun Lee, Hyung Ook Kim, Taewoon Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Sung Ryol Lee, Kyung Uk Jung, Hungdai Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(3):155-162.   Published online June 30, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.11.04.1
  • 6,327 View
  • 130 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 13 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Choosing the appropriate antibiotic is important for treatment of complicated appendicitis. However, increasing multidrug resistant bacteria have been a serious problem for successful treatment. This study was designed to identify bacteria isolated from patients with complicated appendicitis and reveal their susceptibilities for antibiotics and their relationship with patient clinical course.
Methods
This study included patients diagnosed with complicated appendicitis and examined the bacterial cultures and antimicrobial susceptibilities of the isolates. Data were retrospectively collected from medical records of Kangbuk Samsung Hospital from January 2008 to February 2018.
Results
The common bacterial species cultured in complicated appendicitis were as follows: Escherichia coli (n=113, 48.9%), Streptococcus spp. (n=29, 12.6%), Pseudomonas spp. (n=23, 10.0%), Bacteriodes spp. (n=22, 9.5%), Klebsiella (n=11, 4.8%), and Enterococcus spp. (n=8, 3.5%). In antibiotics susceptibility testing, the positive rate of extended-spectrum beta lactamase (ESBL) was 9.1% (21 of 231). The resistance rate to carbapenem was 1.7% (4 of 231), while that to vancomycin was 0.4% (1 of 231). E. coli was 16.8% ESBL positive (19 of 113) and had 22.1% and 19.5% resistance rates to cefotaxime and ceftazidime, respectively. Inappropriate empirical antibiotic treatment (IEAT) occurred in 55 cases (31.8%) and was significantly related with organ/space surgical site infection (SSI) (7 of 55, P=0.005).
Conclusion
The rate of antibiotic resistance organisms was high in community-acquired complicated appendicitis in Koreans. Additionally, IEAT in complicated appendicitis may lead to increased rates of SSI. Routine intraoperative culture in patients with complicated appendicitis may be an effective strategy for appropriate antibiotic regimen.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Optimizing Antibiotic Management for Adult Patients Presenting with Acute Perforated Appendicitis: A Quality Improvement Study
    Carlos Gallego-Navarro, Jason Beckermann, Maria E. Linnaus, Hayden J. Swartz, Shelby Stewart, Justin M. York, Ryan R. Gassner, Christopher A. Kasal, Annaliese G. Seidel, Corey J. Wachter, Kirstin J. Kooda, Jennifer R. Rich, Mark D. Sawyer
    Surgical Infections.2025; 26(3): 143.     CrossRef
  • A Prospective Analysis of the Burden of Multi-Drug-Resistant Pathogens in Acute Appendicitis and Their Implication for Clinical Management
    Faruk Koca, Sara Fatima Faqar-Uz-Zaman, Claudia Reinheimer, Michael Hogardt, Volkhard A. J. Kempf, Paul Ziegler, Andreas A. Schnitzbauer, Armin Wiegering, Wolf Otto Bechstein, Patrizia Malkomes
    Antibiotics.2025; 14(4): 378.     CrossRef
  • Culture-based bacterial evaluation of the appendix lumen and antibiotic susceptibility of acute appendicitis in Japan: A single-center retrospective analysis
    Hiroe Kitahara, Yonfan Park, Kai Seharada, Masaki Yoshimura, Akira Horiuchi, Yukihiko Karasawa
    Medicine.2024; 103(29): e39037.     CrossRef
  • Do Cultures From Percutaneously Drained Intra-abdominal Abscesses Change Treatment? A Retrospective Review
    Andrew C. Esposito, Yuqi Zhang, Nupur Nagarkatti, William D. Laird, Nathan A. Coppersmith, Vikram Reddy, Ira Leeds, Anne Mongiu, Walter Longo, Ritche M. Hao, Haddon Pantel
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2023; 66(3): 451.     CrossRef
  • Bacterial pathogens in pediatric appendicitis: a comprehensive retrospective study
    Julia Felber, Benedikt Gross, Arend Rahrisch, Eric Waltersbacher, Evelyn Trips, Percy Schröttner, Guido Fitze, Jurek Schultz
    Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An Update on Acute Appendicitis in Lebanon: Insights From a Single-Center Retrospective Study
    Nagham Bazzi, Samer Dbouk, Ahmad Rached, Sadek Jaber, Hala Bazzi, Manal Jrad, Mariam Bazzi
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Bacterial peritonitis in paediatric appendicitis; microbial epidemiology and antimicrobial management
    Keir Bhaskar, Simon Clarke, Luke S. P. Moore, Stephen Hughes
    Annals of Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobials.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Aerobic Intraoperative Abdominal Cavity Culture Modifies Antibiotic Therapy and Reduces the Risk of Surgical Site Infection in Complicated Appendicitis with Peritonitis
    Víctor Manuel Quintero-Riaza, Romario Chancí-Drago, Natalia Guzmán-Arango, Pablo Posada-Moreno, Tatiana López-Sandoval, Isabel Cristina Ramírez-Sánchez, Johanna Marcela Vanegas-Munera
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 27(11): 2563.     CrossRef
  • Does the Covid-19 pandemic have an effect on wound culture in patients undergoing appendectomy? A Case Control Study
    Hacı BOLAT, Tuğba AVAN MUTLU
    Journal of Contemporary Medicine.2022; 12(2): 332.     CrossRef
  • Are We Hitting the Target?
    Julia Elrod, Fatima Yarmal, Christoph Mohr, Martin Dennebaum, Michael Boettcher, Deirdre Vincent, Konrad Reinshagen, Ingo Koenigs
    Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal.2022; 41(6): 460.     CrossRef
  • Is Routine Intra-operative Gram Stain, Culture, and Sensitivity during an Appendectomy is Effective in Decreasing the Rate of Post-operative Infective Complications?
    Muqdad Fuad, Ahmed Modher, Mohammed Habash
    Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences.2022; 10(B): 868.     CrossRef
  • Die Bedeutung mikrobiologischer Ergebnisse für die Therapie der komplizierten Appendizitis – eine monozentrische Fall-Kontroll-Studie
    F-X. Anzinger, K. Rothe, S. Reischl, C. Stöss, A. Novotny, D. Wilhelm, H. Friess, P-A. Neumann
    Die Chirurgie.2022; 93(10): 986.     CrossRef
  • Implications of bacteriological study in complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis
    Sorin Cimpean, Alberto Gonzalez Barranquero, Ion Surdeanu, Benjamin Cadiere, Guy-Bernard Cadiere
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
Malignant disease
Increased Risk of Neoplasms in Adult Patients Undergoing Interval Appendectomy
Jungtak Son, Yong Jun Park, Sung Ryol Lee, Hyung Ook Kim, Kyung Uk Jung
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(5):311-315.   Published online January 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.10.15.1
  • 7,764 View
  • 216 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 12 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The low rate of recurrent appendicitis after initial nonsurgical management of complicated appendicitis supports the recently implemented strategy of omitting routine interval appendectomy. However, several reports have suggested an increased incidence rate of neoplasms in these patients. We aimed to identify the risk of neoplasms in the population undergoing interval appendectomy.
Methods
This study retrospectively analyzed consecutive cases of appendicitis that were treated surgically between January 2014 and December 2018 at a single tertiary referral center. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they underwent immediate or interval appendectomy. Demographics and perioperative clinical and pathologic parameters were analyzed.
Results
All 2,013 adults included in the study underwent surgical treatment because of an initial diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Of these, 5.5% (111 of 2,013) underwent interval appendectomy. Appendiceal neoplasm was identified on pathologic analysis in 36 cases (1.8%). The incidence of neoplasm in the interval group was 12.6% (14 of 111), which was significantly higher than that of the immediate group (1.2% [22 of 1,902], P < 0.001). Conclusion: The incidence rate of neoplasms was significantly higher in patients undergoing interval appendectomy. These findings should be considered when choosing treatment options after successful nonsurgical management of complicated appendicitis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Incidental appendiceal neoplasms in a multicenter registry of appendicitis management
    Aksel D. Laudon, Brendin R. Beaulieu-Jones, Swetha Duraiswamy, Frank F. Yang, Elizabeth Chen, Dave R. Flum, Kasey Lerner, Heather L. Evans, Lauren Thompson, Faris K. Azar, Alex Charboneau, Vlad V. Simianu, Victoria Valdes, Chaitan Narsule, Sabrina E. Sanc
    Surgery.2026; 190: 109879.     CrossRef
  • Appendiceal Tumor Prevalence in Patients With Periappendicular Abscess
    Roosa Salminen, Jenny Alajääski, Tero Rautio, Saija Hurme, Pia Nordström, Elisa Mäkäräinen, Elina Lietzén, Tarja Pinta, Marie Grönroos-Korhonen, Tuomo Rantanen, Jan Andersén, Anne Mattila, Jyrki Kössi, Antti Riikola, Hannu Paajanen, Markku Matikainen, Ves
    JAMA Surgery.2025; 160(5): 526.     CrossRef
  • Acellular mucin in neoplastic and non-neoplastic conditions of the lower gastrointestinal tract
    Noureldien Darwish, Lynn Guo, Eundong Park, Hwajeong Lee
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Is it Possible to Manage Appendicular Mass Without Surgery?
    Muhammad Albahadili, Saif Mundher Ismael, Monaf Faik Al-Samarraee
    Al-Rafidain Journal of Medical Sciences ( ISSN 2789-3219 ).2025; 9(2): 46.     CrossRef
  • Can Appendiceal Neoplasms Be Predicted in Patients with Presumed Acute Appendicitis?
    Şevki Pedük
    European Journal of Therapeutics.2024; 30(2): 145.     CrossRef
  • Beyond acute appendicitis: a single-institution experience of unexpected pathology findings after 989 consecutive emergency appendectomy
    Pietro Fransvea, Caterina Puccioni, Gaia Altieri, Luca D’Agostino, Gianluca Costa, Giuseppe Tropeano, Antonio La Greca, Giuseppe Brisinda, Gabriele Sganga
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Exploring the mysterious mucinous appendiceal neoplasm
    Erika Hissong
    Seminars in Diagnostic Pathology.2024; 41(5): 222.     CrossRef
  • High Incidence of Appendiceal Neoplasms in the Elderly: A Critical Concern for Non-Surgical Treatment
    Gizem Issin, Fatih Demir, Irem Guvendir Bakkaloglu, Diren Vuslat Cagatay, Hasan Aktug Simsek, Ismail Yilmaz, Ebru Zemheri
    Medical Principles and Practice.2023; 32(6): 358.     CrossRef
  • Benign multicystic mesothelioma of appendiceal origin treated by hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: A case report
    Suk Jun Lee, Ji Hae Nahm, Jeonghyun Kang, Seung Hyuk Baik, Eun Jung Park
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2022; 99: 107665.     CrossRef
  • Risk of appendiceal neoplasm after interval appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Roberto Peltrini, Valeria Cantoni, Roberta Green, Ruggero Lionetti, Michele D'Ambra, Carolina Bartolini, Marcello De Luca, Umberto Bracale, Alberto Cuocolo, Francesco Corcione
    The Surgeon.2021; 19(6): e549.     CrossRef
  • Interval appendicectomy for complicated appendicitis: do not let your guard down!
    R Peltrini, M Podda, S Di Saverio, U Bracale, F Corcione
    British Journal of Surgery.2021; 108(9): e288.     CrossRef
  • Modern Management of the Appendix
    CPT Samuel Grasso, LTC Avery Walker
    Surgical Clinics of North America.2021; 101(6): 1023.     CrossRef
Patient-Controlled Nutrition After Abdominal Surgery: Novel Concept Contrary to Surgical Dogma
Hyung Ook Kim, Mingoo Kang, Sung Ryol Lee, Kyung Uk Jung, Hungdai Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(5):253-258.   Published online October 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.05.29
  • 6,426 View
  • 144 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
According to surgical dogma, patients who are recovering from general anesthesia after abdominal surgery should begin with a clear liquid diet, progress to a full liquid diet and then to a soft diet before taking regular meals. We propose patient-controlled nutrition (PCN), which is a novel concept in postoperative nutrition after abdominal surgery.
Methods
A retrospective pilot study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and effects of PCN. This study was carried out with a total of 179 consecutive patients who underwent a laparoscopic appendectomy between August 2014 and July 2016. In the PCN group, diet was advanced depending on the choice of the patients themselves; in the traditional group, diet was progressively advanced to a full liquid or soft diet and then a regular diet as tolerated. The primary endpoints were time to tolerance of regular diet and postoperative hospital stay.
Results
Time to tolerance of a regular diet (P < 0.001) and postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001) showed statistically significant differences between the groups. Multivariate analysis using linear regression showed that the traditional nutrition pattern was the only factor associated with postoperative hospital stay (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis using logistic regression showed that traditional nutrition was the only risk factor associated with prolonged postoperative hospital stay (≥3 days).
Conclusion
After abdominal surgery, PCN may be a feasible and effective concept in postoperative nutrition. In our Early Recovery after Surgery program, our PCN concept may reduce the time to tolerance of a regular diet and shorten the postoperative hospital stay.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Bilateral Exchange: Enteral Nutrition Clinical Decision Making in Pediatric Surgery Patients
    Manisha B. Bhatia, Cassandra M. Anderson, Abdiwahab N. Hussein, Brian Opondo, Nereah Aruwa, Otieno Okumu, Sarah G. Fisher, Tasha Sparks Joplin, JoAnna L. Hunter-Squires, Brian W. Gray, Peter W. Saula
    Journal of Surgical Research.2024; 295: 139.     CrossRef
  • Clinical pharmacist intervention in Appendectomy - Dexmedetomidine as an adjunct therapy ‎
    Bushra Abdel-Hadi, Sami Raid Abdel-Fattah
    Journal Of Advanced Pharmacy Education And Research.2022; 12(2): 1.     CrossRef
  • 外科患者の栄養管理における給食の意義

    The Japanese Journal of SURGICAL METABOLISM and NUTRITION.2021; 55(2): 57.     CrossRef
Obstructive Left Colon Cancer Should Be Managed by Using a Subtotal Colectomy Instead of Colonic Stenting
Chung Ki Min, Hyung Ook Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Kyung Uk Jung, Sung Ryol Lee, Hungdai Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(6):215-220.   Published online December 31, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.6.215
  • 7,594 View
  • 81 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 10 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

This study compared a subtotal colectomy to self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) insertion as a bridge to surgery for patients with left colon-cancer obstruction.

Methods

Ninety-four consecutive patients with left colon-cancer obstruction underwent an emergency subtotal colectomy or elective SEMS insertion between January 2007 and August 2014. Using prospectively collected data, we performed a retrospective comparative analysis on an intention-to-treat basis.

Results

A subtotal colectomy and SEMS insertion were attempted in 24 and 70 patients, respectively. SEMS insertion technically failed in 5 patients (7.1%). The mean age and rate of obstruction in the descending colon were higher in the subtotal colectomy group than the SEMS group. Sex, underlying disease, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, and pathological stage showed no statistical difference. Laparoscopic surgery was performed more frequently in patients in the SEMS group (62 of 70, 88.6%) than in patients in the subtotal colectomy group (4 of 24, 16.7%). The overall rate of postoperative morbidity was higher in the SEMS group. No Clavien-Dindo grade III or IV complications occurred in the subtotal colectomy group, but 2 patients (2.9%) died from septic complications in the SEMS group. One patient (4.2%) in the subtotal colectomy group had synchronous cancer. The total hospital stay was shorter in the subtotal colectomy group. The median number of bowel movements in the subtotal colectomy group was twice per day at postoperative 3–6 months.

Conclusion

A subtotal colectomy for patients with obstructive left-colon cancer is a clinically and oncologically safer, 1-stage, surgical strategy compared to SEMS insertion as a bridge to surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Colonic stenting: is the bridge to surgery worth its cost? A cost-effectiveness analysis at a single Asian institution
    Michelle Shi Qing Khoo, Frederick H. Koh, Sharmini Su Sivarajah, Leonard Ming-Li Ho, Darius Kang-Lie Aw, Cheryl Xi-Zi Chong, Fung Joon Foo, Winson Jianhong Tan
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 555.     CrossRef
  • Short- and long-term outcomes of subtotal/total colectomy in the management of obstructive left colon cancer
    Jung Tak Son, Yong Bog Kim, Hyung Ook Kim, Chungki Min, Yongjun Park, Sung Ryol Lee, Kyung Uk Jung, Hungdai Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(3): 260.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes After Colonic Self-Expanding Metal Stent Insertion Without Fluoroscopy: A Surgeon-Led 10-Year Experience
    Tara M. Connelly, Jessica Ryan, Niamh M. Foley, Helen Earley, Shaheel M. Sahebally, Carl O'Brien, Peter McCullough, Peter Neary, Fiachra Cooke
    Journal of Surgical Research.2023; 281: 275.     CrossRef
  • Which treatment strategy is optimal for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction? A Bayesian meta-analysis
    Kaibo Ouyang, Zifeng Yang, Yuesheng Yang, Junjiang Wang, Deqing Wu, Yong Li
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • New Challenges in Surgical Approaches for Colorectal Cancer during the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Dragos Serban, Geta Vancea, Catalin Gabriel Smarandache, Simona Andreea Balasescu, Gabriel Andrei Gangura, Daniel Ovidiu Costea, Mihail Silviu Tudosie, Corneliu Tudor, Dan Dumitrescu, Ana Maria Dascalu, Ciprian Tanasescu, Laura Carina Tribus
    Applied Sciences.2022; 12(11): 5337.     CrossRef
  • Functional outcomes of surgery for colon cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sanne J. Verkuijl, Jara E. Jonker, Monika Trzpis, Johannes G.M. Burgerhof, Paul M.A. Broens, Edgar J.B. Furnée
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021; 47(5): 960.     CrossRef
  • Short-term outcomes of stents in obstructive rectal cancer
    Nora H. Trabulsi, Hajar M. Halawani, Esraa A. Alshahrani, Rawan M. Alamoudi, Sama K. Jambi, Nouf Y. Akeel, Ali H. Farsi, Mohammed O. Nassif, Ali A. Samkari, Abdulaziz M. Saleem, Nadim H. Malibary, Mohammad M. Abbas, Luca Gianotti, Antonietta Lamazza, Jin
    Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(3): 127.     CrossRef
  • Fluoroscopic Stenting as a Bridge to Surgery versus Emergency Management for Malignant Obstruction of the Colon
    Fan Xue, Feng Lin, Jun Zhou, Ning Feng, You-Gang Cui, Xu Zhang, Yu-Peng Yi, Wen-Zhi Liu
    Emergency Medicine International.2020; 2020: 1.     CrossRef
  • Safety of subtotal or total colectomy with primary anastomosis compared to Hartmann procedure for left-sided colon cancer obstruction or perforation
    Eun-Do Kim, Jin-Kwon Lee, Jin-Kyu Cho, Jae-Myung Kim, Ji-Ho Park, Ju-Yeon Kim, Sang-Ho Jeong, Young-Tae Ju, Chi-Young Jeong, Eun-Jung Jung, Young-Joon Lee, Soon-Chan Hong, Seung-Jin Kwag
    Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology.2019; 15(2): 106.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic assisted insertion of a colonic self-expandable metallic stent
    Y. M. Ho, V. Shenoy, J. Alberts, N. Ward
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2018; 22(10): 809.     CrossRef
Outcomes of a Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using a Glove Port With a Percutaneous Organ-Holding Device and Commercially-Available Multichannel Single-Port Device
Jieun Lee, Sung Ryol Lee, Hyung Ook Kim, Byung Ho Son, Wonjun Choi
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(1):42-46.   Published online February 28, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.1.42
  • 5,078 View
  • 43 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

A laparoscopic appendectomy is now commonly performed. The push in recent years toward reducing the number of ports required to perform this surgery has led to the development of a single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SPA). We compared postoperative pain after an SPA using a glove port with a percutaneous organ-holding device (group 1) with that of an SPA using a commercially-available multichannel single-port device (group 2).

Methods

Between March 2010 and July 2011, a retrospective study was conducted of a total of 77 patients who underwent an SPA by three surgeons at department of surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Medical Center. Thirty-eight patients received an SPA using a glove port with a percutaneous organ-holding device. The other 39 patients received an SPA using a commercially-available multichannel single port (Octo-Port or SILS Port). Operative details and postoperative outcomes were collected and evaluated.

Results

There were no differences in the mean operative times, times to pass gas, postoperative hospital stays, or cosmetic satisfaction scores between the two groups. The pain score in the first 24 hours after surgery was higher in group 2 than group 1 patients (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the trocar used in group 2 was more expensive than that used in group 1.

Conclusion

An SPA using a glove port with a percutaneous organ-holding device was associated with a lower pain score during the first 24 hours after surgery because of the shorter fascia incision length and a cheaper cost than an SPA using a commercially-available multichannel single-port device.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Single port surgery in pediatric age: report of first 300 cases
    Nicola ZAMPIERI, Elettra VESTRI, Federica BIANCHI, Marta PERETTI, Simone PATANÈ, Mariangela CECCHETTO, Alberto MANTOVANI, Annamaria GIAMBANCO, Fabiana FARINA, Gabriella SCIRÈ, Francesco S. CAMOGLIO
    Minerva Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A brief overview of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy as an optimal surgical procedure for patients with acute appendicitis: still a long way to go
    Yang Chen, Zongqi Fan, Xiaoxin Zhang, Xinao Fu, Jushang Li, Jieqing Yuan, Shigang Guo
    Journal of International Medical Research.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using the Surgical-Glove Port Through an Umbilical Incision: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
    Tran Que Son, Tran Hieu Hoc, Vu Duc Long, Tran Thanh Tung, Nguyen Minh Tuan, Bui Minh Hue, Nguyen Van Minh, Nguyen Toan Thang
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The use of expanding ports in laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery may cause more pain: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
    Jannie Dressler, Lars N. Jorgensen
    Surgical Endoscopy.2017; 31(11): 4400.     CrossRef
  • Two-port laparoscopic anterior resection through a self-made glove device versus conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparison of short-term surgical results
    Hong Zhang, Yunzhi Ling, Jinchun Cong, Mingming Cui, Dingsheng Liu, Chunsheng Chen
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The learning curve of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy performed by emergent operation
    YongHun Kim, WooSurng Lee
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Needlescopic-Assisted Surgery: Single-Incision or Multi-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery?
    Chang-Nam Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(1): 9.     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP