Annals of Coloproctology

Original Article

Colorectal cancer

Outcomes of side-to-end versus end-to-end colorectal anastomosis in nonemergent sigmoid and rectal cancers: a randomized controlled clinical trial: Tamer A.A.M. Habeeb, Hatem Mohammad, Tamer Wasefy, Mohamed Ibrahim Mansour; Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(3):231-241. Published online March 11, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00906.0129

7,540 View
184 Download
3 Web of Science
5 Citations

Purpose
The outcomes of open colorectal anastomosis of side-to-end versus end-to-end in nonemergent sigmoid and rectal cancer surgery in adults were compared.
Methods
A randomized controlled trial on individuals with sigmoid and rectal cancers was conducted between September 2016 and September 2018.
Results
The mean age was 62.58±12.3 years in the side-to-end anastomotic (SEA) group and 61.03±13.98 years in the end-to-end anastomotic (EEA) group. Except for the operative time, intraoperative data revealed no significant differences between the studied groups, and the SEA group revealed that the mean anastomotic time was significantly shorter. Perioperative blood loss, length of stay, reoperation, inpatient death, infection, and bleeding were significantly associated with leakage. There is a statistically significant change regarding the range of bowel frequency in the EEA group only (P=0.04). There is a statistically significant difference regarding incontinence for flatus in the SEA group only (P≤0.001). A statistically significant change in both groups regards incontinence for liquid stools (P≤0.001) and clustering of stools (P≤0.001 and P=0.043). The quality of life in the SEA group significantly dropped at 6 months and then returned to baseline as regards to physical well-being (PWB), functional well-being (FWB), and colorectal cancer symptoms (CCS) with no difference as regards SWB and EWB, while in the EEA group, the exact change happened only as regard PWB and FWB, but SWB and CCS percentage did not return to baseline.
Conclusion
The SEA group offers a safe alternative approach to the EEA group.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Short-term Outcomes of Linear vs. Circular Stapling for Esophagojejunostomy in Gastric Cancer: an Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis
Yeojin Boo, Ho-Jung Shin, Jeong Ho Song, Sang-Yong Son, Hoon Hur, Sang-Uk Han
Journal of Gastric Cancer.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Minimally invasive left colectomy with total intracorporeal anastomosis versus extracorporeal anastomosis. A single center cohort study. Stage 2b IDEAL framework for evaluating surgical innovation
Xavier Serra-Aracil, Irene Gómez-Torres, Andrea Torrecilla-Portoles, Anna Serracant-Barrera, Albert García-Nalda, Anna Pallisera-Lloveras
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The impact of powered circular staplers on anastomotic leak in left-sided colorectal cancer surgeries
Hayoung Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Young Il Kim, Eun Jung Park, Min Hyun Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim
Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(10): 6111. CrossRef
Is end-to-end or side-to-end anastomotic configuration associated with risk of positive intraoperative air leak test in left-sided colon and rectal resections for colon and rectal cancers?
Sami Alahmadi, David L. Berger, Christy E. Cauley, Robert N. Goldstone, William V. Kastrinakis, Marc Rubin, Hiroko Kunitake, Rocco Ricciardi, Grace C. Lee
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; : 101899. CrossRef
Operative time and surgical efficiency in end-to-end versus side-to-end colorectal anastomosis for rectal cancer
Asif Almas Haque, Mir Rasekh Alam Ovi, Mohammad Tanvir Jalal
International Surgery Journal.2024; 12(1): 42. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search