Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Tsunekazu Hanai"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Display
Original Articles
Minimally invasive surgery
Comparative study of robot-assisted surgery for right-sided colon cancer: a propensity score–matched analysis of the hinotori Surgical Robot System and the da Vinci Surgical System
Koji Morohara, Hidetoshi Katsuno, Tomoyoshi Endo, Kenichi Nakamura, Kazuhiro Matsuo, Kazuki Tsujimura, Tetsuya Koide, Takashi Imanaka, Tomohiro Kubo, Satoshi Arakawa, Tsunekazu Hanai, Zenichi Morise
Ann Coloproctol. 2026;42(2):237-246.   Published online April 15, 2026
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.01151.0164
  • 305 View
  • 15 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
The da Vinci Surgical System has led to major advances in robot-assisted colorectal surgery. Following its patent expiration, domestic alternatives such as the hinotori Surgical Robot System have been developed in Japan. However, clinical comparisons between the hinotori and the da Vinci Xi systems remain limited. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of right-sided colon cancer surgeries performed with either system using propensity score matching.
Methods
This retrospective study included 39 patients who underwent da Vinci–assisted surgery and 37 who underwent surgery using the hinotori system. Propensity score matching was performed using 7 covariates: age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, clinical T and N categories, and surgeon experience (≥100 prior robotic colorectal surgeries). To assess the robustness of the findings, inverse probability weighting was also applied using the same covariates. Surgical, postoperative, and pathological outcomes were evaluated.
Results
After matching, 27 patients were included in each group. The hinotori group had significantly longer operative and console times (236 minutes vs. 191 minutes, P=0.001; 140 minutes vs. 90 minutes, P<0.001). No significant differences were observed in blood loss, complication rates, length of hospital stay, or lymph node harvest. No conversions or reoperations occurred. One readmission for ileus was noted in the da Vinci group, whereas none occurred in the hinotori group.
Conclusion
Right colectomy assisted by the hinotori system demonstrated short-term outcomes equivalent to those of the da Vinci system, despite a prolonged operative time. Further prospective studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are warranted.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Beyond the era of monopoly to diversity: new horizons in robotic colorectal cancer surgery
    Jeonghee Han
    Annals of Coloproctology.2026; 42(2): 149.     CrossRef
Minimally invasive surgery
Propensity score–matched comparison of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery using hinotori and da Vinci
Hidetoshi Katsuno, Koji Morohara, Tomoyoshi Endo, Kenji Kikuchi, Kenichi Nakamura, Kazuhiro Matsuo, Takahiko Higashiguchi, Tetsuya Koide, Hiromi Kanai, Satoshi Arakawa, Tsunekazu Hanai, Zenichi Morise
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(4):310-318.   Published online August 25, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00136.0019
  • 3,901 View
  • 68 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 8 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The hinotori Surgical Robot System (hereafter “hinotori”) is a novel platform for robot-assisted surgery, while the da Vinci Surgical System (“da Vinci”) remains the field standard. This study compared short-term surgical outcomes of rectal cancer surgery between these systems using propensity score–matched analysis.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted of 209 consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery with the da Vinci and 58 patients with the hinotori system. After 2:1 propensity score matching, 108 da Vinci and 54 hinotori cases were included. Surgical outcomes, including operative time, blood loss, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and pathological findings, were compared.
Results
After matching, the baseline demographics were well balanced between groups. The hinotori system was associated with significantly longer operative time (266 minutes vs. 227 minutes, P=0.014) and console time (156 minutes vs. 110 minutes, P=0.001). However, estimated blood loss and postoperative complication rate did not differ significantly. Pathological findings, including the number of lymph nodes retrieved and the incidence of positive surgical margins, were comparable between systems.
Conclusion
In rectal surgery, the hinotori system demonstrates comparable short-term safety outcomes to da Vinci. Despite longer operative times and limited integrated instrumentation, hinotori‐assisted procedures may be feasible in selected patients. Further research should address long-term oncological outcomes and strategies to improve procedural efficiency.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Learning curve for robot-assisted rectal resection using the hinotori™ surgical robot system: a risk-adjusted cumulative sum analysis in a surgical team without prior robotic surgery experience
    Akiyoshi Ikebata, Koji Okabayashi, Kohei Shigeta, Hiroyuki Hazama, Masayo Ogiri, Jae-Hoon Yoo, Yumi Egashira, Ryusuke Amemiya, Shinichi Tsuwano, Shigeo Hayatsu
    Journal of Robotic Surgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Beyond multiport DaVinci®: a closer look at less commonly used robotic systems in resectional colorectal surgery
    Rahul Bhome, Subash P Vasudevan
    Journal of Robotic Surgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Early Clinical Experience With the Hinotori Robotic Surgical System: Comparable Perioperative Outcomes With the da Vinci Platform in Primary Lung Cancer
    Yasuaki Kubouchi, Ryota Yasuda, Yuji Nozaka, Wakako Fujiwara, Shinji Matsui, Yugo Tanaka
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Global Evolution of Robotic Colorectal Surgery: Lessons from Hong Kong’s Innovation and Implementation
    Trevor M. Yeung, Justin N. F. Lam, Rossetti H. Y. Lam, Simon S. Ng
    Cancers.2026; 18(8): 1259.     CrossRef
  • Comparative study of robot-assisted surgery for right-sided colon cancer: a propensity score–matched analysis of the hinotori Surgical Robot System and the da Vinci Surgical System
    Koji Morohara, Hidetoshi Katsuno, Tomoyoshi Endo, Kenichi Nakamura, Kazuhiro Matsuo, Kazuki Tsujimura, Tetsuya Koide, Takashi Imanaka, Tomohiro Kubo, Satoshi Arakawa, Tsunekazu Hanai, Zenichi Morise
    Annals of Coloproctology.2026; 42(2): 237.     CrossRef
  • Beyond the era of monopoly to diversity: new horizons in robotic colorectal cancer surgery
    Jeonghee Han
    Annals of Coloproctology.2026; 42(2): 149.     CrossRef
  • Experience with hinotoriTM, the Japan-made Surgical Robotic System, in the Initial 94 Cases of Colorectal Cancer
    Takehito Yamamoto, Yoshiro Itatani, Koya Hida, Hiromitsu Kinoshita, Ryosuke Okamura, Masahiro Maeda, Yu Yoshida, Nobuaki Hoshino, Keiko Kasahara, Hisatsugu Maekawa, Ryuhei Aoyama, Kazutaka Obama
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2026; 10(2): 213.     CrossRef
  • Racing toward the future of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: a comparative study of hinotori and da Vinci
    Sung Uk Bae
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(4): 259.     CrossRef
Technical Note
Minimally invasive surgery
Short-term surgical outcomes of robot-assisted colectomy for colon cancer using the hinotori Surgical Robot System
Koji Morohara, Hidetoshi Katsuno, Tomoyoshi Endo, Kenji Kikuchi, Kenichi Nakamura, Kazuhiro Matsuo, Takahiko Higashiguchi, Tetsuya Koide, Tsunekazu Hanai, Zenichi Morise
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(1):97-103.   Published online February 28, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00871.0124
  • 6,190 View
  • 152 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
PDFSupplementary Material

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Experience with hinotoriTM, the Japan-made Surgical Robotic System, in the Initial 94 Cases of Colorectal Cancer
    Takehito Yamamoto, Yoshiro Itatani, Koya Hida, Hiromitsu Kinoshita, Ryosuke Okamura, Masahiro Maeda, Yu Yoshida, Nobuaki Hoshino, Keiko Kasahara, Hisatsugu Maekawa, Ryuhei Aoyama, Kazutaka Obama
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2026; 10(2): 213.     CrossRef
  • Comparative study of robot-assisted surgery for right-sided colon cancer: a propensity score–matched analysis of the hinotori Surgical Robot System and the da Vinci Surgical System
    Koji Morohara, Hidetoshi Katsuno, Tomoyoshi Endo, Kenichi Nakamura, Kazuhiro Matsuo, Kazuki Tsujimura, Tetsuya Koide, Takashi Imanaka, Tomohiro Kubo, Satoshi Arakawa, Tsunekazu Hanai, Zenichi Morise
    Annals of Coloproctology.2026; 42(2): 237.     CrossRef
  • Beyond the era of monopoly to diversity: new horizons in robotic colorectal cancer surgery
    Jeonghee Han
    Annals of Coloproctology.2026; 42(2): 149.     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP