Purpose Diagnosing sarcopenia necessitates the measurement of skeletal muscle mass. However, guidelines lack a standardized imaging modality with thresholds validated among Asians. This systematic review compared ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA)/body composition monitoring in the detection of sarcopenia within Asian populations.
Methods PubMed and Embase were systematically searched for studies analyzing ultrasonography, CT, MRI, and BIA in diagnosing sarcopenia among Asians. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale.
Results Pooled findings from 21,598 patients across 25 studies were examined. In receiver operating characteristic analysis, ultrasound displayed a pooled mean area under the curve (AUC) of 0.767 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.709–0.806), with mean sensitivity of 81.1% (95% CI, 0.744–0.846) and specificity of 73.1% (95% CI, 0.648–0.774), for detecting sarcopenia in Asian populations. CT exhibited an AUC of 0.720 (sensitivity, 54.0%; specificity, 92.0%). MRI demonstrated an AUC of 0.839 (sensitivity, 67.0%; specificity, 66.0%). BIA displayed an AUC of 0.905 (95% CI, 0.842–0.968), 80.7% sensitivity (95% CI, 0.129–0.679), and 82.4% specificity (95% CI, 0.191–0.633).
Conclusion Various modalities aid in diagnosing sarcopenia, and selection should be individualized. Although only BIA and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry are recommended by the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia and the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People, ultrasound imaging may hold diagnostic value for sarcopenia in the Asian population. In certain groups, diagnostic use of CT and MRI is warranted. Future research can standardize and validate modality-specific thresholds and protocols within Asian populations.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Comment on: Associations of CT Muscle Area and Density With Functional Outcomes and Mortality Across Anatomical Regions in Older Men Li Feng Tan, Xizhen Low, Frederick H. Koh Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.2026; 74(1): 286. CrossRef
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Diagnosis and Monitoring of Sarcopenia Robert D. Boutin, Leon Lenchik, Jonathan C. Baker, Hailey Allen, James Banks, Sarah I. Kamel, Kelby B. Napier, Nicholas G. Rhodes, Jinel A. Scott, Connie C. So, Daniel E. Wessell Journal of the American College of Radiology.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Reliability of Rectus Femoris Ultrasound Measurements and Relationship With Truncal Muscle Mass in Healthy Individuals Using Concurrent CT Measurements as the Reference Standard Jie Lu, Kiran M. Bambha, Zain Shariff, Manish Dhyani, Manjiri Dighe, Guilherme M. Cunha Ultrasound Quarterly.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Developing a reliable and convenient methodology for ultrasound muscle assessment in critically ill patients: A reliability study Yong Jae Na, Shin Who Park, Woo Jung Seo, Kyung Cheon Seo, Jong Yoon Chang, Hyo Jin Lim, Hyeon Jeong Moon, Roo Ma Lee, Eun Jae Ko, Sang-Bum Hong, Won Kim Medicine.2025; 104(17): e42263. CrossRef
Prognostic significance of MRI-derived sarcopenia in patients with endometrial cancer Tahsin Aybal, Esra Keles, Beyzanur Kahyaoğlu, Ayşe Demirden Abdominal Radiology.2025; 51(3): 1636. CrossRef
The Present and Future of Sarcopenia Diagnosis and Exercise Interventions: A Narrative Review Hongje Jang, Jeonghyeok Song, Jeonghun Kim, Hyeongmin Lee, Hyemin Lee, Hye-yeon Park, Huijin Shin, Yeah-eun Kwon, Yeji Kim, JongEun Yim Applied Sciences.2025; 15(23): 12760. CrossRef
Diagnostic accuracy of the SARC-CalF in community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis Eun-Jung Kim, Soomin Hong, Da-Young Kim, Youn-Jung Son, Joseph E Gaugler The Gerontologist.2025;[Epub] CrossRef