Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
5 "Youn Young Park"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Editorial
Dynamics of the microbiota in right-sided colon cancer patients: pre- and post-tumor resection
Youn Young Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(1):1-2.   Published online February 28, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00094.0013
  • 222 View
  • 29 Download
PDF
Case Report
Metachronous carcinoma at the colostomy site after abdominoperineal resection of rectal cancer: a case report
Young Sun Choi, Kil-young Lee, Youn Young Park, Hyung Jin Kim, Jaeim Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(2):175-177.   Published online July 27, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.00185.0026
  • 3,758 View
  • 157 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Metachronous carcinoma at the colostomy site is very rare after abdominoperineal resection. A 53-year-old male patient underwent an abdominoperineal resection 6 years earlier for rectal cancer developed metachronous carcinoma at the site of stoma. A portion of the colon, including the stoma and the surrounding skin, was resected and a new stoma was created in the transverse colon. Although the occurrence of carcinoma at the stoma site is a rare condition, careful observation for the stoma and colonoscopy for surveillance are necessary.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Colostomy‐site carcinoma with primitive phenotype in a rectal cancer patient after achieving pathological complete response with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Takayuki Kodama, Maki Kanzawa, Hiroshi Hasegawa, Shuichi Tsukamoto, Mari Nishio, Manabu Shigeoka, Yu‐ichiro Koma, Tomoo Itoh, Hiroshi Yokozaki
    Pathology International.2024; 74(1): 33.     CrossRef
  • Metachronous Carcinoma at Colostomy Site Post Abdominoperineal Resection – A Rare Presentation Case Report
    Muhammed Huzaifa, Ankita Singh, Vaibhav Aggarwal, Anita Dhar
    Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal.2023; 12(2): 1.     CrossRef
  • Peristomal adenocarcinoma 16 years after colorectal adenocarcinoma resection with curative intent
    Kayleigh A M van Dam, Thaís T T Tweed, Bart de Vries, Henricus J Belgers
    Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
Original Articles
Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Completion on Oncologic Outcomes in ypTNMstage 2 Rectal Cancer Patients
Youn Young Park, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim, Sat Byol Lee, Ga Ram Kim, Byung Soh Min, Seong-Taek Oh
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(6):335-341.   Published online December 31, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.03.10
  • 3,686 View
  • 62 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Adjuvant chemotherapy (aCT) in rectal cancer patients who have undergone curative resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) is controversial. We aimed to investigate the benefits of using aCT and the clinical impact of completing aCT in ypstage 2 rectal cancer patients.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed clinicopathological data from patients who had undergone radical resection after nCRT between January 2006 and December 2012. In total, 152 patients with ypT3/4N0M0 rectal cancer were included. Of these patients, 139 initiated aCT, while 13 did not receive aCT (no-aCT). Among those who received aCT, 132 patients completed their planned cycles (aCT-completion) whereas 7 did not (aCT-incompletion). All patients received longcourse chemoradiation; a 5-fluorouracil-based regimen was used for nCRT in most patients. The prognostic factors affecting disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.
Results
The median follow-up duration was 41 months. Demographic data did not differ significantly among the 3 groups. In multivariate analysis, open surgery, a tumor size >2 cm, retrieval of <12 lymph nodes, circumferential resection margin (CRM) positivity and aCT incompletion were independent prognostic factors for poor DFS. Old age (≥60 years), open surgery, CRM positivity, aCT incompletion, and lack of aCT initiation compared to aCT completion were independent prognostic factors for poor OS.
Conclusion
In ypstage 2 rectal cancer patients, aCT after nCRT and total mesorectal excision affected both DFS and OS; however, only patients who completed planned aCT exhibited survival benefits. Therefore, improving patients’ compliance with the completion of aCT is desirable.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer after neo-adjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy and surgery: A retrospective study in Vietnamese patients
    Thang Tran, Huy Van Nguyen, Hoa Thi Nguyen, Hung Van Nguyen
    Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2023; 85(9): 4234.     CrossRef
  • Watch and wait strategies for rectal cancer: A systematic review
    In Ja Park
    Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(2): 91.     CrossRef
Short-term Outcomes After Upfront Chemotherapy Followed by Curative Surgery in Metastatic Colon Cancer: A Comparison With Upfront Surgery Patients
Myung Hyun Han, Youn Young Park, Shiva Pratap, Yoon Dae Han, Min Soo Cho, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(6):327-334.   Published online December 31, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.03.04.1
  • 3,378 View
  • 69 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Upfront systemic chemotherapy with target agents has been recommended for patients with stage IV colon cancer. Some with partial response are considered for curative resection. There is high risk of developing postoperative complications following upfront systemic chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate short-term perioperative outcomes of curative surgery after upfront chemotherapy in comparison with upfront surgery in patients with metastatic colon cancer.
Methods
Between January 2010 and October 2015, 146 patients (80 in the surgery first group, 66 in the upfront chemotherapy group) who underwent surgical resection before or after systemic chemotherapy for metastatic colon cancer were included in the present study. All decisions for treatment were made through a multidisciplinary team. Postoperative clinical outcomes and complications were analyzed to compare the groups.
Results
There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of postoperative clinical outcomes. Overall complication rates were not different between the groups (surgery first group: 46.3% vs. upfront chemotherapy group: 60.6%; P = 0.084). When classified according to the Clavien-Dindo method, there was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of major complications (grade 3 or more) (surgery first group: 18.9% vs. upfront chemotherapy group: 27.5%; P = 0.374).
Conclusion
There was no significant increase in major postoperative complications in metastatic colon cancer patients who received upfront chemotherapy followed by curative surgery. Careful patient selection and treatment planning are important.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Impact of preoperative chemotherapy on perioperative morbidity in combined resection of colon cancer and liver metastases
    Joy Z. Done, Angelos Papanikolaou, Miloslawa Stem, Shannon N. Radomski, Sophia Y. Chen, Chady Atallah, Jonathan E. Efron, Bashar Safar
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 27(11): 2380.     CrossRef
  • Treatment for Peritoneal Metastasis of Patients With Colorectal Cancer
    Young Jin Kim, Chang Hyun Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 425.     CrossRef
Influence of Shorter Duration of Prophylactic Antibiotic Use on the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Youn Young Park, Chang Woo Kim, Sun Jin Park, Kil Yeon Lee, Jung Joo Lee, Hye Ok Lee, Suk-Hwan Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(6):235-242.   Published online December 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.6.235
  • 5,229 View
  • 56 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 16 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

This study aimed to identify the risk factors for surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery and to determine whether significantly different SSI rates existed between the short prophylactic antibiotic use group (within 24 hours) and the long prophylactic antibiotic use group (beyond 24 hours).

Methods

The medical records of 327 patients who underwent colorectal resection due to colorectal cancer from January 2010 to May 2014 at a single center were retrospectively reviewed, and their characteristics as well as the surgical factors known to be risk factors for SSIs, were identified.

Results

Among the 327 patients, 45 patients (13.8%) developed SSIs. The patients were divided into two groups according to the duration of antibiotic use: group S (within 24 hours) and group L (beyond 24 hours). Of the 327 patients, 114 (34.9%) were in group S, and 213 (65.1%) were in group L. Twelve patients (10.5%) in group S developed SSIs while 33 patients (15.5%) in group L developed SSIs (P = 0.242). History of diabetes mellitus and lung disease, long operation time, and perioperative transfusion were independent risk factors for SSIs.

Conclusion

This study shows that discontinuation of prophylactic antibiotics within 24 hours after colorectal surgery has no significant influence on the incidence of SSIs. This study also showed that history of diabetes mellitus and lung disease, long operation time, and perioperative transfusion were associated with increased SSI rates.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • RETRACTED: A meta‐analysis of the risk factors for surgical site infection in patients with colorectal cancer
    Yani Chen, Hua Guo, Tian Gao, Jiale Yu, Yujia Wang, Haiquan Yu
    International Wound Journal.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation after implementation of chemical bowel preparation for surgical site infections in elective colorectal cancer surgery and role of antimicrobial stewardship pharmacist: Retrospective cohort study
    Yasuhiro Sasaki, Akira Kurishima, Chieko Miyamoto, Kenichiro Hataji, Toru Tezuka, Hideo Katsuragawa
    Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Antibiotic use during radical surgery in stage I-III colorectal cancer: correlation with outcomes?
    Mingyue Xu, Yuanyuan Chen, Panhua Li, Qianwen Ye, Shouhan Feng, Bing Yan
    BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Surgical Site Infections in Colorectal Cancer Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Surgical Approach and Associated Risk Factors
    Valentin Calu, Catalin Piriianu, Adrian Miron, Valentin Titus Grigorean
    Life.2024; 14(7): 850.     CrossRef
  • Potent antibacterial activity in surgical wounds with local administration of D-PLEX100
    Noam Emanuel, Goldi A. Kozloski, Shlomo Nedvetzki, Sefi Rosenfeld
    European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences.2023; 188: 106504.     CrossRef
  • Worldwide incidence of surgical site infections in general surgical patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 488,594 patients
    Brigid M. Gillespie, Emma Harbeck, Megan Rattray, Rhea Liang, Rachel Walker, Sharon Latimer, Lukman Thalib, Annette Erichsen Andersson, Bronwyn Griffin, Robert Ware, Wendy Chaboyer
    International Journal of Surgery.2021; 95: 106136.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for surgical site infection in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis of observational studies
    ZhaoHui Xu, Hui Qu, ZeZhong Gong, George Kanani, Fan Zhang, YanYing Ren, Shuai Shao, XiaoLiang Chen, Xin Chen, Zubing Mei
    PLOS ONE.2021; 16(10): e0259107.     CrossRef
  • Update on risk factors of surgical site infection in colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhaohui Xu, Hui Qu, George Kanani, Zhong Guo, Yanying Ren, Xin Chen
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2020; 35(12): 2147.     CrossRef
  • Appropriate Prophylactic Antibiotic Use in Clean Wound Surgery Under Local Anesthesia
    Han Gyu Cha, Jin Geun Kwon, Hyun Ho Han, Jin Sup Eom, Eun Key Kim
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Patterns of antibiotics and pathogens for anastomotic leakage after colorectal cancer surgery
    Geunhyeok Yang, Chang Woo Kim, Suk-Hwan Lee
    Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology.2019; 15(2): 79.     CrossRef
  • Challenging surgical dogma in the management of proximal esophageal atresia with distal tracheoesophageal fistula: Outcomes from the Midwest Pediatric Surgery Consortium
    Dave R. Lal, Samir K. Gadepalli, Cynthia D. Downard, Daniel J. Ostlie, Peter C. Minneci, Ruth M. Swedler, Thomas H. Chelius, Laura Cassidy, Cooper T. Rapp, Deborah Billmire, Steven Bruch, R. Carland Burns, Katherine J. Deans, Mary E. Fallat, Jason D. Fras
    Journal of Pediatric Surgery.2018; 53(7): 1267.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of intraoperative handling and wound healing between (NEOSORB® plus) and coated polyglactin 910 suture (NEOSORB®): a prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial
    Bum Sik Tae, Ju Hyun Park, Jung Kwon Kim, Ja Hyeon Ku, Cheol Kwak, Hyeon Hoe Kim, Chang Wook Jeong
    BMC Surgery.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of a change in duration of prophylactic antibiotics on infectious complications after radical cystectomy with a neobladder
    Chung-Jong Kim, Kwang Hyun Kim, Wan Song, Dong Hyeon Lee, Hee Jung Choi
    Medicine.2018; 97(47): e13196.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal surgery and surgical site infection: is a change of attitude necessary?
    Manuela Elia-Guedea, Elena Cordoba-Diaz de Laspra, Estibaliz Echazarreta-Gallego, María Isabel Valero-Lazaro, Jose Manuel Ramirez-Rodriguez, Vicente Aguilella-Diago
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2017; 32(7): 967.     CrossRef
  • Influence of a Shorter Duration of Post-Operative Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Infectious Complications in Patients Undergoing Elective Liver Resection
    Masahiko Sakoda, Satoshi Iino, Yuko Mataki, Yota Kawasaki, Hiroshi Kurahara, Kosei Maemura, Shinichi Ueno, Shoji Natsugoe
    Surgical Infections.2017; 18(2): 149.     CrossRef
  • Efforts to Prevent Surgical Site Infection After Colorectal Surgery
    Byung Wook Min
    Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(6): 211.     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP