Benign proctology,Surgical technique
- Transperineal rectocele repair is ideal for patients presenting with fecal incontinence
-
Marie Shella De Robles, Christopher J. Young
-
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(5):376-379. Published online October 19, 2021
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00157.0022
-
-
6,510
View
-
180
Download
-
3
Web of Science
-
3
Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
- Purpose
Rectocele can be associated with both obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence. There exists a great variety of operative techniques to treat patients with rectocele. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome in a consecutive series of patients who underwent transperineal repair of rectocele when presenting with fecal incontinence as the predominant symptom.
Methods
Twenty-three consecutive patients from April 2000 to July 2015 with symptomatic rectocele underwent transperineal repair by a single surgeon.
Results
All patients had a history of vaginal delivery, with or without evidence of associated anal sphincter injury at the time. The median age of the cohort was 53 years (range, 21–90 years). None were fully continent preoperatively. However, continence improved to just rare mucus soiling or loss of flatus in all patients 6 months after their surgery. There was no operative mortality. Postoperative complications including urinary retention and wound dehiscence occurred in 3 patients.
Conclusion
Fecal incontinence associated with rectocele is multifactorial and may be caused by preexisting anal sphincteric damage and attenuation. Our experience suggests that transperineal repair provides excellent anatomic and physiologic results with minimal morbidity in selected patients presenting with combined rectocele and anal sphincter defect.
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by

- Fecal Incontinence Outcomes Following Transvaginal Posterior Vaginal Wall Repair
Jersey B. Burns, Amr El Haraki, Jesseca Crawford, Candace Y. Parker-Autry
International Urogynecology Journal.2025; 36(5): 1061. CrossRef - IUGA Opinion Paper on Obstructed Defecation: Management of Clinical and Proctographic Rectoceles
Suneetha Rachaneni, Hans Peter Dietz, Pallavi Latthe, Annie Sirany, Anna Spivak, Anupreet Dua
International Urogynecology Journal.2025;[Epub] CrossRef - The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Constipation
Karim Alavi, Amy J. Thorsen, Sandy H. Fang, Pamela L. Burgess, Gino Trevisani, Amy L. Lightner, Daniel L. Feingold, Ian M. Paquette
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2024; 67(10): 1244. CrossRef
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer, Functional outcomes
- Early and Late Functional Outcomes of Anal Sphincter-Sparing Procedures With Total Mesorectal Excision for Anorectal Adenocarcinoma
-
Osama Eldamshety, Sherif Kotb, Ashraf Khater, Sameh Roshdy, Mohamed Elashry, Mohamed S. Zahi, Hend M. Hamdey Rashed Elkalla, Waleed Elnahas, Omar Farouk, Adel Fathi, Ahmed Senbel, Emad-Eldeen Hamed, Khaled Abdelwahab, Islam Abdou Elzahby, Ahmed abdallah, Mahmoud Abdelaziz, Emanuele Lezoche
-
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(3):148-154. Published online April 20, 2020
-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.07.19
-
-
6,427
View
-
114
Download
-
15
Web of Science
-
15
Citations
-
Abstract
PDF
- Background
The study aims to assess the functional outcome of anal sphincter sparing procedures (SSP) with TME for anorectal adenocarcinoma.
Methods
In a multicentric, prospective, single-group study in the period between December 2012 and November 2017, 93 patients presented with anorectal adenocarcinoma were included in the study. Sixty-nine patients underwent SSP with TME. SSP included the combined approach of transabdominal TME with intersphincteric resection (ISR) or transanal transabdominal TME (TATA). Using the Per Anal Examination Scoring System (PASS), postoperative anal function was assessed after one year.
Results
Bowel motility time was 50 (±19) hours. The time needed for narcotic analgesia was 54 (±18.8) hours. Mean hospital stay was 15.4 (±10.25) days. Incidence of evident fecal incontinence after ISR is 10.6% (7/67 cases). The Per Anal Examination Scoring System (PASS) findings of 69 cases are as follows: extremely hypotonic 8.6% (6 cases), slightly hypotonic 26.1% (18 cases), normal tone 58% (40 cases), slightly stenotic 3 cases (4.3%), or occluded 2.9% (2 cases). Urinary dysfunction occurred in one case (1.4%). Temporary diversion was performed in 61 patients (87.1%).
Conclusion
Sphincter preservation with TME for anorectal adenocarcinoma helps avoid permanent stoma and provides a reasonable functional outcome. PASS is a new application for postoperative assessment of anal function
-
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by

- Transanal Minimally Invasive TME (TaTME) Versus Non-Endoscopic Transanal Intersphincteric Resection of Post-Neoadjuvant Ultralow Rectal Adenocarcinoma: A Multicentric, Matched Case–Control Study
Osama Eldamshety, Mohamed Abdekhalek, Amir M. Zaid, Essam Attia, Mohamed Zuhdy, Emanuel Lezoche, Giovanni Lezoche, Enjy Mosaad, Marwa Abogabal, Islam Elzahby
Indian Journal of Surgery.2025; 87(5): 912. CrossRef - Pathologic Implications of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-detected Extramural Venous Invasion of Rectal Cancer
Hyun Gu Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Jong Keon Jang, Seong Ho Park, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2023; 22(1): 129. CrossRef - International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment
Audrius Dulskas, Philip F. Caushaj, Domas Grigoravicius, Liu Zheng, Richard Fortunato, Joseph W. Nunoo-Mensah, Narimantas E. Samalavicius
Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(4): 307. CrossRef - Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early rectal cancer
Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Sung Hwan Cho, Byung-Soo Park, Hyun Sung Kim, Su Bum Park, Hyung Wook Kim, Sang Bo Oh, Tae Un Kim, Dong Hoon Shin
Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(1): 32. CrossRef - Watch and wait strategies for rectal cancer: A systematic review
In Ja Park
Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(2): 91. CrossRef - Current status and role of robotic approach in patients with low-lying rectal cancer
Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(1): 1. CrossRef - Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer
Sung Uk Bae
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 577. CrossRef - Update on Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal
Cancer
Chan Wook Kim
The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, and Current Management
Seung Mi Yeo, Gyung Mo Son
The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Current Status and Future of Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
Sung Uk Bae
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 221. CrossRef - Is It a Refractory Disease?- Fecal Incontinence; beyond
Medication
Chungyeop Lee, Jong Lyul Lee
The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef - Intraoperative neuromonitoring in rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Athina A. Samara, Ioannis Baloyiannis, Konstantinos Perivoliotis, Dimitrios Symeonidis, Alexandros Diamantis, Konstantinos Tepetes
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(7): 1385. CrossRef - Robotic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Technical Controversies and a Systematic Review on the Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes
Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Seon Hahn Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 351. CrossRef - Functional outcomes after sphincter-preserving surgeries for low-lying rectal cancer: A review
Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
Precision and Future Medicine.2021; 5(4): 164. CrossRef - Simplification or Accuracy: In Assessing Functional Outcomes After Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer
Kyung Jong Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(3): 129. CrossRef