Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
4 "Body mass index"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Display
Original Articles
Minimally invasive surgery
Body composition index obtained by using a bioelectrical impedance analysis device can be a predictor of prolonged operative time in patients undergoing minimally invasive colorectal surgery
Ho Seung Kim, Kwang Ho Kim, Gyoung Tae Noh, Ryung-Ah Lee, Soon Sup Chung
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(4):342-350.   Published online June 3, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00262.0037
  • 6,016 View
  • 90 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Obesity has been known to contribute to technical difficulties in surgery. Until now, body mass index (BMI) has been used to measure obesity. However, there are reports that BMI does not always correspond to the visceral fat. Recently, bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) has been used for body composition analysis. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the body composition index obtained using a BIA device in predicting short-term postoperative outcomes.
Methods
Data of patients who underwent elective major colorectal surgery using minimally invasive techniques were reviewed retrospectively. Body composition status was recorded using a commercial BIA device the day before surgery. The relationship between BMI, body composition index, and short-term postoperative outcomes, including operative time, was analyzed.
Results
Sixty-six patients were enrolled in this study. In the correlation analysis, positive correlation was observed between BMI and body composition index. BMI and body composition index were not associated with short-term postoperative outcomes. Percent body fat (odds ratio, 4.226; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.064–16.780; P=0.041) was found to be a statistically significant factor of prolonged operative time in the multivariate analysis. Correlation analysis showed that body fat mass was related to prolonged operative time (correlation coefficients, 0.245; P=0.048). In the area under curve analysis, body fat mass showed a statistically significant predictive probability for prolonged operative time (body fat mass: area, 0.662; 95% CI, 0.531–0.764; P=0.024).
Conclusion
The body composition index can be used as a predictive marker for prolonged operative time. Further studies are needed to determine its usefulness.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Pretreatment bioelectrical impedance analysis predicts chemotherapy efficacy and toxicity in metastatic colorectal cancer patients
    Rikako Kato, Yuji Miyamoto, Yukiharu Hiyoshi, Yuto Maeda, Mayuko Ouchi, Katsuhiro Ogawa, Keisuke Kosumi, Kojiro Eto, Satoshi Ida, Masaaki Iwatsuki, Yoshifumi Baba, Hideo Baba
    Clinical Nutrition ESPEN.2025; 66: 497.     CrossRef
  • Simple perinephric adipose tissue measurement for prediction of failed sentinel lymph node mapping in endometrial cancer
    Lina Salman, Paulina Cybulska, Ryley Fowler, Manjula Maganti, Ur Metser, Sarah E. Ferguson
    International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.2025; 35(11): 101949.     CrossRef
  • The Antibody Response to the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Booster in Healthcare Workers: Association between the IgG Antibody Titers and Anthropometric and Body Composition Parameters
    Marlena Golec, Adam Konka, Martyna Fronczek, Joanna Zembala-John, Martyna Chrapiec, Karolina Wystyrk, Sławomir Kasperczyk, Zenon Brzoza, Rafał Jakub Bułdak
    Vaccines.2022; 10(10): 1638.     CrossRef
Benign GI diease
Factors Predicting the Need for Early Surgical Intervention for Small Bowel Obstruction
Young Jae Cho, In Seok Park, Jungbin Kim, Hyun Jin Cho, Geum Hee Gwak, Keun Ho Yang, Byung Noe Bae, Ki Hwan Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):223-228.   Published online January 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.09.30
  • 7,655 View
  • 196 Download
  • 11 Web of Science
  • 13 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is a common disease that requires hospitalization. The most common cause of SBO is postoperative adhesion. Delayed timing of operations in patients who need surgical intervention results in mortality or morbidity. A number of studies on SBO have established criteria for emergency surgery. However, few objective clinical parameters are available for screening patients who need a delayed operation. Therefore, we analyzed factors that affect the clinical course of SBO to select appropriate therapeutic plans for reducing the risk of complications in these patients.
Methods
We investigated the clinical characteristics of patients admitted to the surgery department of our hospital between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016, who were diagnosed with SBO. Patients were divided into an operative treatment group (n = 12) and a conservative treatment group (n = 96). We compared clinical characteristics between the 2 groups.
Results
The operative treatment group underwent more operations before SBO than the conservative treatment group (P = 0.007). Initial leukocyte counts (P = 0.004) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (P = 0.028) were elevated in the operative group. Body mass index (BMI) was lower in the operative group (P = 0.013).
Conclusion
The number of operations before SBO, leukocyte counts, CRP levels, and BMI were useful parameters for selecting patients who needed an urgent operation for SBO.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Postoperative morbidity following surgery for mechanical adhesive small bowel obstruction: prevalence, risk factors and clinical outcomes
    Timur Buniatov, Matthias Maak, Axel Denz, Christian Krautz, Georg F. Weber, Robert Grützmann, Anke Mittelstädt, Maximilian Brunner
    BMC Surgery.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Correlates of Markedly Elevated C-reactive Protein >200 mg/L and Its Prognostic Role in Intensive Care Unit Admission and Mortality: A Record-based Retrospective Study
    Avelyn Thazhuthadath Kishore, Rosmi Jose
    Journal of Applied Sciences and Clinical Practice.2025; 6(1): 32.     CrossRef
  • Chronic Comorbidities and Failure of Non-Operative Management in Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction: Results of Analysis of National Inpatient Data from the United States
    Gal Malkiely, Maya Paran, Miri Elgabsi, Boris Kessel
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(17): 5989.     CrossRef
  • Prediction and Risk Evaluation for Surgical Intervention in Small Bowel Obstruction †
    Timur Buniatov, Matthias Maak, Anne Jacobsen, Franziska Czubayko, Axel Denz, Christian Krautz, Georg F. Weber, Robert Grützmann, Maximilian Brunner, Anke Mittelstädt
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 15(1): 297.     CrossRef
  • The predictive role of computed tomography with oral contrast in the successful management of adhesive small bowel obstruction
    Mohamed Khattab, Amr Ayad, Sameh Aziz, Peter Alaa, Marie N. Grace, Mohamed Saber
    The Egyptian Journal of Surgery.2024; 43(1): 16.     CrossRef
  • Associated factors with non operative management failure in bowel obstruction
    Omar Gutierrez Moreno, Nicolas Arredondo Mora, Oscar Rincon Barbosa, Francisco Gil Quintero
    Surgery Open Digestive Advance.2024; 16: 100185.     CrossRef
  • Preventable diagnostic errors of lower gastrointestinal perforation: a secondary analysis of a large-scale multicenter retrospective study
    Taku Harada, Takashi Watari, Satoshi Watanuki, Seiko Kushiro, Taiju Miyagami, Syunsuke Syusa, Satoshi Suzuki, Tetsuya Hiyoshi, Suguru Hasegawa, Shigeki Nabeshima, Hidetoshi Aihara, Shun Yamashita, Masaki Tago, Fumitaka Yoshimura, Kotaro Kunitomo, Takahiro
    International Journal of Emergency Medicine.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical and Radiological Factors Associated with Nonoperative Management Failure for Small Bowel Obstruction: A Retrospective Study from a Resource-Limited Setting
    Saleh Al-wageeh, Qasem Alyhari, Faisal Ahmed, Hanan Mohammed, Noha Dahan, Abdullatif Almohtadi, Sameer AL-Nuzili, Mohamed Badheeb, Abdulsattar Naji
    Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management.2024; Volume 20: 893.     CrossRef
  • Development of a predictive model for the need for early surgery in patients with adhesive small-bowel obstruction
    Yanhao Sun, Yilong Hu, Yuanfang Sun
    Journal of International Medical Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predictive factors for operative intervention and ideal length of non-operative trial in adhesive small bowel obstruction
    Tara van Veen, Purushotham Ramanathan, Lolita Ramsey, Jonathan Dort, Dina Tabello
    Surgical Endoscopy.2023; 37(11): 8628.     CrossRef
  • Surgical management of adhesive small bowel obstruction: Is it still mandatory to wait? – An update
    R. Demessence, Y. Lyoubi, F. Feuerstoss, A. Hamy, C. Aubé, A. Paisant, A. Venara
    Journal of Visceral Surgery.2022; 159(4): 309.     CrossRef
  • Prise en charge chirurgicale des syndromes occlusifs de l’intestin grêle sur bride et adhérences postopératoires : faut-il toujours attendre ?
    R. Demessence, Y. Lyoubi, F. Feuerstoss, A. Hamy, C. Aubé, A. Paisant, A. Venara
    Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale.2022; 159(4): 326.     CrossRef
  • Small bowel obstruction
    David J. Detz, Jerica L. Podrat, Jose C. Muniz Castro, Yoon K. Lee, Feibi Zheng, Shawn Purnell, Kevin Y. Pei
    Current Problems in Surgery.2021; 58(7): 100893.     CrossRef
Preoperative Body Mass Index, 30-Day Postoperative Morbidity, Length of Stay and Quality of Life in Patients Undergoing Pelvic Exenteration Surgery for Recurrent and Locally-Advanced Rectal Cancer
Jessica Beaton, Sharon Carey, Michael J Solomon, Ker-Kan Tan, Jane Young
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(2):83-87.   Published online April 25, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.2.83
  • 5,748 View
  • 51 Download
  • 20 Web of Science
  • 22 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Malnutrition is associated with an increased risk of developing complications following gastrointestinal surgery, especially following radical surgeries such as pelvic exenteration. This study aims to determine if preoperative body mass index (BMI) is associated with 30-day morbidity, length of hospital stay and/or quality of life (QoL) in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration surgery for recurrent and locally-advanced rectal cancer prior to a prospective trial.

Methods

A review of all patients who underwent pelvic exenteration surgery prior to 2008 was performed. Patients were included if they had a documented BMI as well as a QoL measurement (Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy - Colorectal questionnaire).

Results

Thirty-one patients, with a mean age of 56 years, had preoperative height and weight data, as well as measures of postoperative QoL, and formed the study group. The numbers of patients with recurrent (n = 17) or locally-advanced rectal cancer (n = 14) were similar. The mean length of stay was 21 days while the mean BMI of the patients was 24.3 (± 5.9) kg/m2. The majority of the patients were either of normal weight (n = 15) or overweight/obese (n = 11). The average length of hospital stay was significantly longer in patients who were underweight compared to those who were of normal weight (F = 6.508, P = 0.006) and those who were overweight and obese (F = 6.508, P = 0.007).

Conclusion

This study suggests that a lower body mass index preoperatively is associated with a longer length of hospital stay. BMI is not associated with long-term QoL in this patient group. However, further prospective research is required.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prospective longitudinal trajectory of cancer survivorship among patients with recurrent rectal cancer: impact of treatment modalities and resection status
    Tarik Sammour, Oliver Peacock, Brian K. Bednarski, Arvind Dasari, Prajnan Das, Benny Johnson, Grace L. Smith, George J. Chang, John Skibber, Y. Nancy You
    Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Living After Pelvic Exenteration: A Mixed-Methods Synthesis of Quality-of-Life Outcomes and Patient Perspectives
    Vlad Rotaru, Elena Chitoran, Aisa Gelal, Giuseppe Gullo, Daniela-Cristina Stefan, Laurentiu Simion
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(18): 6541.     CrossRef
  • Defining Standard Data Reporting in Pelvic Exenteration Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A PelvEx Collaborative Review of Current Data Reporting

    Cancers.2025; 17(17): 2764.     CrossRef
  • Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Locally Recurrent Rectal Cancer
    Niamh McKigney, Fergus Houston, Ellen Ross, Galina Velikova, Julia Brown, Deena Pravin Harji
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2023; 30(7): 3969.     CrossRef
  • Prevention and management of complications in pelvic exenteration
    Pia Persson, Peter Chong, Colin W Steele, Martha Quinn
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022; 48(11): 2277.     CrossRef
  • Patient‐reported outcomes after pelvic exenteration for colorectal cancer: A systematic review
    Andreas Denys, Yves van Nieuwenhove, Dirk Van de putte, Eva Pape, Piet Pattyn, Wim Ceelen, Gabriëlle H. van Ramshorst
    Colorectal Disease.2022; 24(4): 353.     CrossRef
  • Pelvic exenteration: Pre-, intra-, and post-operative considerations
    Kheng-Seong Ng, Peter J.M. Lee
    Surgical Oncology.2022; 43: 101787.     CrossRef
  • Pelvic exenteration: Pre-, intra-, and post-operative considerations
    Kheng-Seong Ng, Peter J.M. Lee
    Surgical Oncology.2021; 37: 101546.     CrossRef
  • Functional outcomes following pelvic exenteration: results from a prospective cohort study
    Preet G. S. Makker, Cherry E. Koh, Michael J. Solomon, James Ratcliffe, Daniel Steffens
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(10): 2647.     CrossRef
  • Quality of life outcomes in patients undergoing surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer
    Tamara Glyn, Frank Frizelle
    Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2020; 31(3): 100767.     CrossRef
  • The obesity paradox in beyond total mesorectal excision surgery for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer
    Daniel L. H. Baird, Constantinos Simillis, Gianluca Pellino, Christos Kontovounisios, Shahnawaz Rasheed, Paris P. Tekkis
    Updates in Surgery.2019; 71(2): 313.     CrossRef
  • The effect of preoperative nutritional status on postoperative complications and overall survival in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration: A multi-disciplinary, multi-institutional cohort study
    N.J. Lyell, M. Kitano, B. Smith, A.L. Gleisner, F.J. Backes, G. Cheng, M.D. McCarter, S. Abdel-Misih, E.L. Jones
    The American Journal of Surgery.2019; 218(2): 275.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Nutrition Status and Postoperative Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
    Lauren Reece, Helen Dragicevich, Claire Lewis, Caila Rothwell, Oliver M. Fisher, Sharon Carey, Nayef A. Alzahrani, Winston Liauw, David L. Morris
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2019; 26(8): 2622.     CrossRef
  • Factors affecting hospital length of stay following pelvic exenteration surgery
    Ying Guo, Eugene Chang, Mehtap Bozkurt, Minjeong Park, Diane Liu, Jack B. Fu
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018; 117(3): 529.     CrossRef
  • Is BMI associated with post‐operative complication risk among patients undergoing major abdominal surgery for cancer? A systematic review
    Tasha M. Hughes, Kejal Shah, Sabrena Noria, Timothy Pawlik
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018; 117(5): 1009.     CrossRef
  • A systematic review examining quality of life following pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and recurrent rectal cancer
    E. Rausa, M. E. Kelly, L. Bonavina, P. R. O'Connell, D. C. Winter
    Colorectal Disease.2017; 19(5): 430.     CrossRef
  • The Evolution of Pelvic Exenteration Practice at a Single Center: Lessons Learned from over 500 Cases
    Cherry E. Koh, Michael J. Solomon, Kilian G. Brown, Kirk Austin, Christopher M. Byrne, Peter Lee, Jane M. Young
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2017; 60(6): 627.     CrossRef
  • Pelvic exenteration for advanced malignancy in elderly patients
    R W Radwan, M D Evans, M Davies, D A Harris, J Beynon, O Hatcher, P Bose, M G Lucas, J Featherstone, U Khot, T V Chandrasekaran, N D Carr, S Gwynne, P Drew, M D Phan
    Journal of British Surgery.2016; 103(2): e115.     CrossRef
  • Systematic review of health-related quality of life in patients undergoing pelvic exenteration
    D.P. Harji, B. Griffiths, G. Velikova, P.M. Sagar, J. Brown
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO).2016; 42(8): 1132.     CrossRef
  • Exenteración pélvica total por cáncer primario del recto: resultados inmediatos y alejados
    Guillermo Bannura, Alejandro Barrera, Carlos Melo, Felipe Illanes, Cristián Gallardo
    Revista Chilena de Cirugía.2016; 68(3): 237.     CrossRef
  • Translation from clinical trials to routine practice: How to demonstrate community benefit
    David Roder, Elizabeth Buckley
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology.2015; 11(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Body Mass Index and Postoperative Complications After Pelvic Exenteration in Recurrent or Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients
    Moo-Jun Baek
    Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(2): 60.     CrossRef
Impact of Body Mass Index on Surgical Outcomes of Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Resection.
Joh, Yong Geul , Kim, Seon Han , Yoon, Jin Seok , Chung, Choon Sik , Lee, Dong Keun
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2003;19(4):243-247.
  • 1,644 View
  • 6 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study was to determine whether obesity increases the risk of performing a laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer.
METHODS
Prospectively collected data were obtained for 103 patients who had undergone laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer from September 2001 to August 2002. Patients who had had a previous abdominal operation, a total colectomy or an additional surgical procedure at the time of colon resection were excluded from the analysis. The patients were divided into two groups based on body mass index (BMI kg/m2): the normal group (BMI <25) and the obesity group (BMI 25). Intraoperative blood loss, operative time, conversion, length of hospital stay and complications were analyzed.
RESULTS
Nineteen patients (25%) were obese. Operation time (183.2 min vs 202.1 min) and the blood loss (98.2 ml vs 168.2 ml) were significantly increased in the obese patients, but hospital discharge after surgery (11.7 days vs 11.9 days) and the morbidity rate (8.5% vs 5.3%) were not different between the groups. Conversion to the an open precedure occurred with one obese patient, but that was not related to obesity. In the analysis of the low anterior resection, blood loss (94.6 ml vs 186.6 ml) was significantly higher in obese patients, but no statistically significant differences existed for other surgical outcomes between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
A laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer can be safely performed in obese patients.
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP