Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
56 "Colorectal surgery"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Reviews
Minimally invasive surgery
Robotic colorectal surgery training: Portsmouth perspective
Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Sentilnathan Subramaniam, Diana Ronconi Di Giuseppe, Rauand Duhoky, Jim S. Khan
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):350-362.   Published online August 30, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00444.0063
  • 1,691 View
  • 64 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
This study aims to discuss the principles and pillars of robotic colorectal surgery training and share the training pathway at Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust. A narrative review is presented to discuss all the relevant and critical steps in robotic surgical training. Robotic training requires a stepwise approach, including theoretical knowledge, case observation, simulation, dry lab, wet lab, tutored programs, proctoring (in person or telementoring), procedure-specific training, and follow-up. Portsmouth Colorectal has an established robotic training model with a safe stepwise approach that has been demonstrated through perioperative and oncological results. Robotic surgery training should enable a trainee to use the robotic platform safely and effectively, minimize errors, and enhance performance with improved outcomes. Portsmouth Colorectal has provided such a stepwise training program since 2015 and continues to promote and augment safe robotic training in its field. Safe and efficient training programs are essential to upholding the optimal standard of care.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • From the Editor: Uniting expertise, a new era of global collaboration in coloproctology
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 285.     CrossRef
Translational/basic research
Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches in colorectal surgery
Bigyan B. Mainali, James J. Yoo, Mitchell R. Ladd
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):336-349.   Published online August 30, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00437.0062
  • 1,175 View
  • 44 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine (TERM) is an emerging field that has provided new therapeutic opportunities by delivering innovative solutions. The development of nontraditional therapies for previously unsolvable diseases and conditions has brought hope and excitement to countless individuals globally. Many regenerative medicine therapies have been developed and delivered to patients clinically. The technology platforms developed in regenerative medicine have been expanded to various medical areas; however, their applications in colorectal surgery remain limited. Applying TERM technologies to engineer biological tissue and organ substitutes may address the current therapeutic challenges and overcome some complications in colorectal surgery, such as inflammatory bowel diseases, short bowel syndrome, and diseases of motility and neuromuscular function. This review provides a comprehensive overview of TERM applications in colorectal surgery, highlighting the current state of the art, including preclinical and clinical studies, current challenges, and future perspectives. This article synthesizes the latest findings, providing a valuable resource for clinicians and researchers aiming to integrate TERM into colorectal surgical practice.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • From the Editor: Uniting expertise, a new era of global collaboration in coloproctology
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 285.     CrossRef
Tolerance to and postoperative outcomes with early oral feeding following elective bowel surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Lord Mvoula, Evelyn Irizarry
Received July 17, 2023  Accepted November 21, 2023  Published online July 31, 2024  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00472.0067    [Epub ahead of print]
  • 669 View
  • 15 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Advancements in gastrointestinal surgery have directed attention toward optimizing recovery, including through the use of feeding methods that reduce prolonged postoperative hospital stays, complications, and mortality, among other undesirable outcomes. This study’s primary goals were to identify current peer-reviewed literature reporting the postoperative outcomes of elective bowel surgery and to evaluate the clinical evidence of patients’ tolerance to oral feeding following elective bowel surgery.
Methods
An exhaustive literature search was conducted via PubMed and Scopus. The search results were screened for potential articles, and articles were assessed for eligibility based on prespecified eligibility criteria. The data were synthesized, and the results were reported and discussed thematically.
Results
The database search yielded 1,667 articles, from which 18 randomized controlled trials were chosen for inclusion in this study. This study included 874 early oral feeding (EOF) patients, 865 traditional oral feeding patients, and 91 patients whose postoperative care was unspecified. Data synthesis was done, and meta-analyses were conducted. The results showed that EOF patients required a significantly shorter time to tolerate a solid diet and had shorter hospital stays. In addition, bowel function was restored earlier in EOF groups.
Conclusion
The results show good tolerance to EOF, shorter hospitalizations, and faster restoration of bowel function, suggesting that EOF after elective bowel surgery is relatively safe. However, further studies with similar baseline conditions should be conducted to verify these results.
Technical Notes
Can the Heald anal stent help to reduce anastomotic or rectal stump leak in elective and emergency colorectal surgery? A single-center experience
Michael Jones, Brendan Moran, Richard John Heald, John Bunni
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(1):82-85.   Published online February 26, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00038.0005
  • 1,996 View
  • 181 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Anastomotic and rectal stump leaks are feared complications of colorectal surgery. Diverting stomas are commonly used to protect low rectal anastomoses but can have adverse effects. Studies have reported favorable outcomes for transanal drainage devices instead of diverting stomas. We describe our use of the Heald anal stent and its potential impact in reducing anastomotic or rectal stump leak after elective or emergency colorectal surgery. We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of patients in whom a Heald anal stent had been used to “protect” a colorectal anastomosis or a rectal stump, in an elective or emergency context, for benign and malignant pathology. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were reviewed using clinical and radiological records. The Heald anal stent was used in 93 patients over 4 years. Forty-six cases (49%) had a colorectal anastomosis, and 47 (51%) had an end stoma with a rectal stump. No anastomotic or rectal stump leaks were recorded. We recommend the Heald anal stent as a simple and affordable adjunct that may decrease anastomotic and rectal stump leak by reducing intraluminal pressure through drainage of fluid and gas.
Minimally invasive surgery
Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for anterior resection
Toan Duc Pham, Tomas Larach, Bushra Othman, Amrish Rajkomar, Alexander G. Heriot, Satish K. Warrier, Philip Smart
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(6):526-530.   Published online December 19, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00458.0065
  • 3,683 View
  • 90 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Minimally invasive colorectal surgery is currently well-accepted, with open techniques being reserved for very difficult cases. Laparoscopic colectomy has been proven to have lower mortality, complication, and ostomy rates; a shorter median length of stay; and lower overall costs when compared to its open counterpart. This trend is seen in both benign and malignant indications. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) in colorectal surgery was first described in the early 1990s. Three recent meta-analyses comparing transabdominal extraction against NOSES concluded that NOSES was superior in terms of overall postoperative complications, recovery of gastrointestinal function, postoperative pain, aesthetics, and hospital stay. However, NOSES was associated with a longer operative time. Herein, we present our technique of robotic NOSES anterior resection using the da Vinci Xi platform in diverticular disease and sigmoid colon cancers.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Precision and Power: A Comprehensive Review of Exploring the Role of Laser Treatment in Hemorrhoidal Management
    Dheeraj Surya, Pankaj Gharde
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
Reviews
Colorectal cancer
Essential anatomy for lateral lymph node dissection
Yuichiro Yokoyama, Hiroaki Nozawa, Kazuhito Sasaki, Koji Murono, Shigenobu Emoto, Hiroyuki Matsuzaki, Shinya Abe, Yuzo Nagai, Yuichiro Yoshioka, Takahide Shinagawa, Hirofumi Sonoda, Daisuke Hojo, Soichiro Ishihara
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(6):457-466.   Published online December 8, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00164.0023
  • 2,590 View
  • 191 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
In Western countries, the gold-standard therapeutic strategy for rectal cancer is preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) following total mesorectal excision (TME), without lateral lymph node dissection (LLND). However, preoperative CRT has recently been reported to be insufficient to control lateral lymph node recurrence in cases of enlarged lateral lymph nodes before CRT, and LLND is considered necessary in such cases. We performed a literature review on aspects of pelvic anatomy associated with rectal surgery and LLND, and then combined this information with our experience and knowledge of pelvic anatomy. In this review, drawing upon research using a 3-dimensional anatomical model and actual operative views, we aimed to clarify the essential anatomy for LLND. The LLND procedure was developed in Asian countries and can now be safely performed in terms of functional preservation. Nonetheless, the longer operative time, hemorrhage, and higher complication rates with TME accompanied by LLND than with TME alone indicate that LLND is still a challenging procedure. Laparoscopic or robotic LLND has been shown to be useful and is widely performed; however, without a sufficient understanding of anatomical landmarks, misrecognition of vessels and nerves often occurs. To perform safe and accurate LLND, understanding the landmarks of LLND is essential.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The role of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in advanced rectal cancer: a review of current evidence and outcomes
    Gyu-Seog Choi, Hye Jin Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 363.     CrossRef
  • Dissection layer selection based on an understanding of pelvic fascial anatomy in transanal total mesorectal excision
    Daichi Kitaguchi, Masaaki Ito
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 375.     CrossRef
Benign bowel disease
Multimodal prerehabilitation for elderly patients with sarcopenia in colorectal surgery
Jingting Wu, Hannah Chi, Shawn Kok, Jason M.W. Chua, Xi-Xiao Huang, Shipin Zhang, Shimin Mah, Li-Xin Foo, Hui-Yee Peh, Hui-Bing Lee, Phoebe Tay, Cherie Tong, Jasmine Ladlad, Cheryl H.M. Tan, Nathanelle Khoo, Darius Aw, Cheryl X.Z. Chong, Leonard M.L. Ho, Sharmini S. Sivarajah, Jialin Ng, Winson J.H. Tan, Fung-Joon Foo, Bin-Tean Teh, Frederick H. Koh
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(1):3-12.   Published online March 31, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.01207.0172
  • 4,388 View
  • 300 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 14 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Sarcopenia, which is characterized by progressive and generalized loss of skeletal muscle mass and strength, has been well described to be associated with numerous poor postoperative outcomes, such as increased perioperative mortality, postoperative sepsis, prolonged length of stay, increased cost of care, decreased functional outcome, and poorer oncological outcomes in cancer surgery. Multimodal prehabilitation, as a concept that involves boosting and optimizing the preoperative condition of a patient prior to the upcoming stressors of a surgical procedure, has the purported benefits of reversing the effects of sarcopenia, shortening hospitalization, improving the rate of return to bowel activity, reducing the costs of hospitalization, and improving quality of life. This review aims to present the current literature surrounding the concept of sarcopenia, its implications pertaining to colorectal cancer and surgery, a summary of studied multimodal prehabilitation interventions, and potential future advances in the management of sarcopenia.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Preoperative Management of the Adult Oncology Patient
    Shannon M. Popovich, Thomas R. Vetter
    Anesthesiology Clinics.2024; 42(1): 145.     CrossRef
  • The potential use of perioperative rectus femoris ultrasonography in guiding prehabilitation strategies
    W.R. Martis
    Journal of Clinical Anesthesia.2024; 92: 111302.     CrossRef
  • Perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection using ArtiSential® versus robotic approach in patients with rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis
    I. K. Kim, C. S. Lee, J. H. Bae, S. R. Han, W. Alshalawi, B. C. Kim, I. K. Lee, D. S. Lee, Y. S. Lee
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Differences in Functional Capacity between Oncologic and Non-Oncologic Populations: Reference Values
    Egoitz Mojas, Aitor Santisteban, Iker Muñoz-Pérez, Arkaitz Larrinaga-Undabarrena, Maria Soledad Arietaleanizbeaskoa, Nere Mendizabal-Gallastegui, Gonzalo Grandes, Jon Cacicedo, Xabier Río
    Healthcare.2024; 12(3): 318.     CrossRef
  • The use of technology in cancer prehabilitation: a systematic review
    San San Tay, Fuquan Zhang, Edmund Jin Rui Neo
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Sarcopenia as a Preoperative Risk Stratification Tool among Older Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

    Advances in Geriatric Medicine and Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Analysis of effect of colonoscopy combined with laparoscopy in the treatment of colorectal tumors
    Deyu Zhao, Xun Sun, Xun Guo, Wang Jianfeng
    Technology and Health Care.2024; 32(4): 2115.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosing Sarcopenia with AI-Aided Ultrasound (DINOSAUR)—A Pilot Study
    Vanessa Yik, Shawn Shi Xian Kok, Esther Chean, Yi-En Lam, Wei-Tian Chua, Winson Jianhong Tan, Fung Joon Foo, Jia Lin Ng, Sharmini Sivarajah Su, Cheryl Xi-Zi Chong, Darius Kang-Lie Aw, Nathanelle Ann Xiaolian Khoo, Paul E. Wischmeyer, Jeroen Molinger, Stev
    Nutrients.2024; 16(16): 2768.     CrossRef
  • The relation between preoperative radiological sarcopenia and postoperative recovery of physical activity in older surgical cancer patients; an explorative study
    S. Hendriks, M.G. Huisman, L. Weerink, L.T. Jonker, B.C. van Munster, J.J. de Haan, G.H. de Bock, B.L. van Leeuwen
    The Journal of nutrition, health and aging.2024; 28(10): 100345.     CrossRef
  • Effects of the Strength, Assistance in walking, Rise from a chair, Climb stairs, and Falls score on postoperative clinical outcomes following colorectal cancer surgery: a retrospective study
    Young Jae Kim, Sung Uk Bae, Kyeong Eui Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical impact of multidisciplinary team management on postoperative short-term outcomes in colorectral cancer surgery
    Shota Kuwabara, Keita Ishido, Yuma Aoki, Kazuyuki Yamamoto, Yasuhito Shoji, Tatsunosuke Ichimura, Hiroto Manase, Satoshi Hirano
    Updates in Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Soft Tissue Sarcoma with Lower Limb Impairment: Development of a Specific Rehabilitation Protocol Based on Demolitive and Reconstructive Surgery Types
    Caterina Galluccio, Marco Germanotta, Sergio Valeri, Beniamino Brunetti, Bruno Vincenzi, Stefania Tenna, Chiara Pagnoni, Rossana Alloni, Michela Angelucci, Rosa Salzillo, Marco Morelli Coppola, Alice Valeri, Roberto Passa, Francesca Falchini, Arianna Pava
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(23): 7023.     CrossRef
  • Get Fit: Muscle Health for Crohn’s Disease Surgical Outcome Optimization
    Sara Massironi, Pierpaolo Sileri, Silvio Danese
    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Recommendations on the use of prehabilitation, i.e. comprehensive preparation of the patient for surgery
    Tomasz Banasiewicz, Jarosław Kobiela, Jarosław Cwaliński, Piotr Spychalski, Patrycja Przybylska, Karolina Kornacka, Dagmara Bogdanowska-Charkiewicz, Magdalena Leyk-Kolańczak, Maciej Borejsza-Wysocki, Dominika Batycka-Stachnik, Rafał Drwiła
    Polish Journal of Surgery.2023; 95(4): 62.     CrossRef
Optimal anastomotic technique in rectal surgery to prevent anastomotic leakage
Daichi Kitaguchi, Masaaki Ito
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(2):97-105.   Published online January 3, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00787.0112
  • 4,596 View
  • 352 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 10 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Complications after colorectal surgery remain inevitable, and anastomotic leakage is one of the most severe and potentially fatal complications. Generally, anastomotic leakage is associated with severe peritonitis, the need for emergency reoperation, and an increased mortality rate. Additionally, particularly after rectal cancer surgery, it has a negative impact on long-term outcomes, including postoperative anorectal function, local recurrence, and survival. To prevent anastomotic leakage, understanding the characteristics of each anastomotic technique and establishing a stable anastomotic procedure are important. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) is a relatively new advanced surgical access technique for pelvic dissection and facilitates different anastomotic techniques without the need for transabdominal rectal transection. Especially, stapled anastomosis in TaTME, also known as double purse-string circular stapled anastomosis or the single stapling technique (SST), has gained much attention as an alternative to the conventional double stapling technique (DST). In this article, we describe the DST, SST, and hand-sewn anastomosis as anastomotic techniques after rectal surgery, focusing mainly on the differences between conventional anastomotic techniques and SST in TaTME. Furthermore, the blood flow evaluation method for the reconstructive colon before anastomosis, which is extremely important in anastomotic leakage prevention regardless of the anastomotic type, is also described.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Dissection layer selection based on an understanding of pelvic fascial anatomy in transanal total mesorectal excision
    Daichi Kitaguchi, Masaaki Ito
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 375.     CrossRef
  • Successful Clinical Avoidance of Colorectal Anastomotic Leakage through Local Decontamination
    Gerhard Ernst Steyer, Markus Puchinger, Johann Pfeifer
    Antibiotics.2024; 13(1): 79.     CrossRef
  • Combined Robotic Transanal Transection Single-Stapled Technique in Ultralow Rectal Endometriosis Involvement Associated With Parametrial and Vaginal Infiltration
    Gianmarco D'Ancona, Benjamin Merlot, Quentin Denost, Stefano Angioni, Thomas Dennis, Horace Roman
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology.2024; 31(4): 267.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for the failure of endoscopic balloon dilation to manage anastomotic stricture from colorectal surgery: retrospective cohort study
    Young Il Kim, Seung Wook Hong, Seok-Byung Lim, Dong-Hoon Yang, Eon Bin Kim, Min Hyun Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Chang Sik Yu
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(4): 1775.     CrossRef
  • The impact of powered circular staplers on anastomotic leak in left-sided colorectal cancer surgeries
    Hayoung Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, Young Il Kim, Eun Jung Park, Min Hyun Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(10): 6111.     CrossRef
  • Effect of powered circular stapler in colorectal anastomosis after left-sided colic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Andrea Scardino, Carlo Galdino Riva, Luca Sorrentino, Sara Lauricella, Alberto Aiolfi, Matteo Rottoli, Gianluca Bonitta, Marco Vitellaro, Luigi Bonavina, Davide Bona, Michael Kelly, Emanuele Rausa
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Early detection of anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery: the role of early warning score and C-reactive protein
    Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 415.     CrossRef
  • Optimal Indocyanine Green Dosage for Repetitive Angiography for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
    Gyung Mo Son, Sang-Ho Park, Nam Su Kim, Mi Sook Yun, In Young Lee, Myeong-Sook Kwon, Tae Kyun Kim, Eun Hwa Lee, Eun Jung Hwang, Kwang-Ryul Baek
    Medicina.2024; 60(12): 1966.     CrossRef
  • The Safe Values of Quantitative Perfusion Parameters of ICG Angiography Based on Tissue Oxygenation of Hyperspectral Imaging for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study
    Gyung Son, Armaan Nazir, Mi Yun, In Lee, Sun Im, Jae Kwak, Sang-Ho Park, Kwang-Ryul Baek, Ines Gockel
    Biomedicines.2023; 11(7): 2029.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
Outcomes of redo for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Ricardo Purchio Galletti, Gabriel Andrade Agareno, Lucas de Abreu Sesconetto, Rafael Benjamim Rosa da Silva, Rafael Vaz Pandini, Lucas Soares Gerbasi, Victor Edmond Seid, Sérgio Eduardo Alonso Araujo, Francisco Tustumi
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(5):375-384.   Published online December 20, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00605.0086
  • 3,159 View
  • 133 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
This study aimed to review the outcomes of redo procedures for failed colorectal or coloanal anastomoses.
Methods
A systematic review was performed using the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and LILACS databases. The inclusion criteria were adult patients undergoing colectomy with primary colorectal or coloanal anastomosis and studies that assessed the postoperative results. The protocol is registered in PROSPERO (No. CRD42021267715).
Results
Eleven articles met the eligibility criteria and were selected. The studied population size ranged from 7 to 78 patients. The overall mortality rate was 0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0%–0.01%). The postoperative complication rate was 40% (95% CI, 40%–50%). The length of hospital stay was 13.68 days (95% CI, 11.3–16.06 days). After redo surgery, 82% of the patients were free of stoma (95% CI, 75%–90%), and 24% of patients (95% CI, 0%–39%) had fecal incontinence. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (P=0.002) was associated with a lower probability of being free of stoma in meta-regression.
Conclusion
Redo colorectal and coloanal anastomoses are strategies to restore colonic continuity. The decision to perform a redo operation should be based on a proper evaluation of the morbidity and mortality risks, the probability of remaining free of stoma, the quality of life, and a functional assessment.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Laparoscopic redo endorectal pull‐through procedure for complex rectovaginal fistula after rectal resection for endometriosis: A Video Vignette
    Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo, Francisco Tustumi, Ana Sarah Portilho, Lucas de Araujo Horcel, Victor Edmond Seid
    Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(11): 2284.     CrossRef
Inflammatory bowel diseases
Colorectal surgical management of colitis induced by vasculitis in the absence of inflammatory bowel disease: a case report and literature review
Jessica A. Paynter, Kirby R. Qin, Georgia Seamer, Ruchira Fernando, Janelle Brennan, Chun Hin Angus Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(3):193-203.   Published online November 16, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00584.0083
  • 3,493 View
  • 128 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Colitis caused by vasculitis is a rare and poorly understood pathology. Little evidence exists on its clinical presentation, path to diagnosis, and surgical management. In this report, we present a case report and literature review. A healthy 20-year-old male patient presented with hemorrhagic colitis requiring total colectomy with end ileostomy. Pathological examination showed pancolitis with multiple ulcers, transmural inflammation, hemorrhage, and microvascular thrombosis. Extensive serological testing revealed elevated cytoplasmic antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (c-ANCA) and eosinophilia, leading to a diagnosis of eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) and vasculitis-induced colitis. A literature review was subsequently conducted. Nineteen studies were found documenting vasculitis-induced colitis in the absence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Systemic signs of vasculitis, hemorrhagic colitis, and progression to fulminant colitis were present. Of all patients, 40.0% required colorectal surgery and 62.5% of those patients received a stoma; 25% underwent emergency surgery following failed immunosuppression. All cases relied on clinical correlation with serology and/or histopathology to reach a final diagnosis. We report a case of vasculitis-induced colitis caused by c-ANCA−positive EGPA. The review shows that vasculitis-induced colitis without IBD is an important differential that clinicians should be aware of in patients presenting with colitis.
Original Articles
Surgical management of retrorectal tumors: a single-center 12 years’ experience
Amirhosein Naseri, Behnam Behboudi, Ali Faryabi, Seyed Mohsen Ahmadi Tafti, Amirsina Sharifi, Mohammad Reza Keramati, Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli, Amir Keshvari, Mehdi Zeinalizadeh, Reza Akbari Asbagh, Niloufar Hoorshad, Alireza Kazemeini
Received April 26, 2022  Accepted June 23, 2022  Published online October 11, 2022  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00297.0042    [Epub ahead of print]
  • 2,804 View
  • 73 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Retrorectal tumors (RTs) are rare tumors that arise in the space between the mesorectum and the pelvic wall and often originate in embryonic tissues. The primary treatment for these tumors is complete excision surgery, and choosing the best surgical approach is very important.
Methods
In this study, we retrospectively collected the data of 15 patients with RTs who underwent surgery in Imam Khomeini Hospital (Tehran, Iran) for 12 years to share our experiences of patients’ treatment and compare different surgical approaches.
Results
A total of 5 tumors were malignant, 10 were benign, and most of the tumors were congenital. Malignant tumors were seen in older patients. Three surgical procedures were performed on patients. Three patients underwent abdominal approach surgery, and 8 patients underwent posterior surgery. A combined surgical approach was performed on 4 patients. Two patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. The abdominal approach had the least long-term complication, and the combined approach had the most complications; laparoscopic surgery reduced the length of hospital stay and complications after surgery.
Conclusion
A multidisciplinary team collaboration using magnetic resonance imaging details is necessary to determine a surgical treatment approach. It could reduce the need for a preoperative biopsy. However, every approach has its advantages and disadvantages, and individualized treatment is the key.
Anorectal benign disease
Simple mucopexy and hemorrhoidal arterial ligation with and without Doppler guide: a randomized clinical trial for short-term outcome
Mahdi Alemrajabi, Abolfazl Akbari, Sara Sohrabi, Mohammad Rezazadehkermani, Mohammad Moradi, Shahram Agah, Mohsen Masoodi
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(4):351-356.   Published online May 16, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00017.0002
  • 5,624 View
  • 120 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Hemorrhoids are the most common benign anorectal diseases. Mucopexy strengthens the anal canal mucosa, which can be performed alone or in combination with Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation (DG-HAL). In this study, we compared the postoperative complications between simple mucopexy plus HAL with and without a Doppler guide.
Methods
This study was performed as a single-blinded randomized clinical trial. Patients referred to a tertiary colorectal referral clinic with grades 3 and 4 hemorrhoids who were candidates for surgical intervention entered the study. Thirty-six patients were randomly divided into 2 groups. Group A including 18 patients underwent mucopexy and DG-HAL and the other 18 patients (group B) underwent standard mucopexy and HAL without a Doppler guide. Postoperative pain score and the duration of oral analgesic consumption were recorded. Additionally, postoperative symptoms and complications were recorded and compared between the 2 methods.
Results
There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in terms of pain score and the duration of postoperative analgesic consumption as well as the incidence of postoperative complications. Besides, the primary grade of hemorrhoids was not significantly associated with recurrence, but there was a significant association between body mass index and Wexner score (WS) with recurrence. The mean WS of patients showed a significant decrease in both groups postoperatively. However, the rate of WS reduction was not remarkably different between the 2 groups.
Conclusion
Simple mucopexy with blind HAL (without Doppler guide) might be considered for the treatment of grades 3 and 4 hemorrhoids effectively.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of acute and chronic hemorrhoidal disease
    Antonio Brillantino, Adolfo Renzi, Pasquale Talento, Luigi Brusciano, Luigi Marano, Maurizio Grillo, Mauro Natale Maglio, Fabrizio Foroni, Alessio Palumbo, Maria Laura Sandoval Sotelo, Luciano Vicenzo, Michele Lanza, Giovanna Frezza, Massimo Antropoli, Cl
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 287.     CrossRef
  • Conventional Excisional Haemorrhoidectomy versus Transanal Haemorrhoidal Dearterialization for Haemorrhoids: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Juliana Jee, Lauren Vourneen O’Connell, Ishapreet Kaur, Shaheel Mohammad Sahebally
    Digestive Surgery.2024; 41(4): 204.     CrossRef
  • Haemorrhoid artery ligation – recto anal repair (HAL‐RAR) blind versus Doppler: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Amos Nepacina Liew, Jason Wang, Michelle Zhiyun Chen, Yeng Kwang Tay, Joseph C.H. Kong
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2024; 94(11): 2053.     CrossRef
  • Picking Up the Threads: Long-Term Outcomes of the Sutured Haemorrhoidopexy: A Retrospective Single-Centre Cohort Study
    Sara Z. Kuiper, Kayleigh A. M. Van Dam, Merel L. Kimman, Litza Mitalas, Paula G. M. Koot, Jarno Melenhorst, Sander M. J. Van Kuijk, Carmen D. Dirksen, Stephanie O. Breukink
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(1): 391.     CrossRef
Anorectal physioloy
Validation of low anterior resection syndrome score in Brazil with Portuguese
Kelly C.L.R. Buzatti, Andy Petroianu, Søren Laurberg, Rodrigo G. Silva, Beatriz D.S. Rodrigues, Peter Christensen, Antonio Lacerda-Filho, Therese Juul
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(5):402-409.   Published online May 13, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00136.0019
  • 3,656 View
  • 117 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study was performed to investigate the convergent validity, discriminative validity, and reliability of the Brazilian version of the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score in a population with low educational and socioeconomic levels.
Methods
The LARS score was translated into the Portuguese language by forward- and back-translation procedures. In total, 127 patients from a public hospital in Brazil completed the questionnaires. The convergent validity was tested by comparing the LARS score with the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core Module 30 (QLQ-C30) and with patients’ self-reported quality of life. For the discriminative validity, we tested the ability of the score to differentiate among subgroups of patients regarding neoadjuvant radiotherapy, type of surgery, and tumor distance from the anal verge. The test-retest reliability was investigated in a subgroup of 36 patients who responded to the survey twice in 2 weeks.
Results
The LARS score demonstrated a strong correlation with 5 of 6 items from the EORTC QLQ-C30 (P<0.05) and good concordance with patients’ self-reported quality of life (95.3%), confirming the convergent validity. The score was able to discriminate between subgroups of patients with different clinical characteristics related to LARS (P<0.001). The agreement between the test and retest showed that 86.1% of the patients remained in the same LARS category, and there was no significant difference between the LARS score numerical values (P=0.80), indicating good reliability overall.
Conclusion
The Brazilian version of the LARS score is a valid and reliable instrument to assess postoperative bowel function in a population with low educational and socioeconomic levels.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Validation of the Vietnamese version of the low anterior resection syndrome score questionnaire
    Tuong-Anh Mai-Phan, Vu Quang Pham
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
Minimally invasive surgery,Surgical technique
The impact of assistants’ reverse alignment surgical skill proficiency on laparoscopic colorectal surgery
Seunghun Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(6):432-441.   Published online January 20, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00689.0098
  • 3,253 View
  • 132 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
We aimed to investigate the difference in the surgical outcome based on whether the assistant overcame the mirror image in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.
Methods
Three hundred patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery performed by single operator were divided into 2 groups. Based on the assistants’ experience, patients who underwent surgery involving 1 of 6 residents with an experience of fewer than 30 surgeries each were classified into group 1. Patients who underwent surgery involving a single fellow as an assistant with an experience of over 1,000 surgeries were classified into group 2. According to the type of surgery, patients were divided into left and right colon resection groups and the surgical outcome of groups 1 and 2 was investigated.
Results
Group 2 exhibited shorter operation time, less bleeding, shorter postoperative hospital stay, lower open conversion, and anastomotic leakage rate than group 1. In right colon resection, the operation time was shorter in group 2. In left colon resection, group 2 exhibited shorter operation time, less bleeding, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and lower anastomotic leakage rate. In the multivariate analysis, the assistant was a factor affecting the operation time in the entire surgery.
Conclusion
Assistants’ reverse alignment surgical skill proficiency was a factor affecting the operation time.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
    Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
    The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304.     CrossRef
  • Can assistants’ skills be used to improve colorectal cancer surgery outcomes in a way similar to the “butterfly effect”?
    Je-Ho Jang
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(6): 391.     CrossRef
Benign GI diease,Benign diesease & IBD,Complication,Surgical technique
Efficacy and Safety of Endoscopic Clipping for Acute Anastomotic Bleeding After Colorectal Surgery
Ryun Kyong Ha, Kyung Su Han, Sung Sil Park, Dae Kyung Sohn, Chang Won Hong, Byung Chang Kim, Bun Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(3):262-265.   Published online October 26, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00297.0042
  • 4,232 View
  • 163 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Anastomotic bleeding after colorectal surgery is a rare, mostly self-limiting, postoperative complication that could lead to a life-threatening condition. Therefore, prompt management is required. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic clipping for acute anastomotic bleeding after colorectal surgery.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients pathologically diagnosed with colorectal cancer at National Cancer Center, Korea from January 2018 to November 2020, which presented with anastomotic bleeding within the first postoperative week and were endoscopically managed with clips.
Results
Nine patients had anastomotic bleeding, underwent endoscopic management, and, therefore, were included in this study. All patients underwent laparoscopic (low/ultralow) anterior resection with mechanical double-stapled anastomosis. Anastomotic bleeding was successfully managed through a colonoscopy with clips on the first trial in all patients. Hypovolemic shock occurred in one patient, following anastomotic breakdown.
Conclusion
Endoscopic clipping seems to be an effective and safe treatment for anastomotic bleeding with minimal physiologic stress, easy accessibility, and scarce postoperative complications. However, a surgical backup should always be considered for massive bleeding.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Post-Surgical Imaging Assessment in Rectal Cancer: Normal Findings and Complications
    Federica De Muzio, Roberta Fusco, Carmen Cutolo, Giuliana Giacobbe, Federico Bruno, Pierpaolo Palumbo, Ginevra Danti, Giulia Grazzini, Federica Flammia, Alessandra Borgheresi, Andrea Agostini, Francesca Grassi, Andrea Giovagnoni, Vittorio Miele, Antonio B
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(4): 1489.     CrossRef
  • Preventing Anastomotic Leakage, a Devastating Complication of Colorectal Surgery
    Hyun Gu Lee
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP