Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Complete regression"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Display
Review
Colorectal cancer
Survival outcomes of salvage surgery in the watch-and-wait approach for rectal cancer with clinical complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Wenjie Lin, Ian Jun Yan Wee, Isaac Seow-En, Aik Yong Chok, Emile Kwong-Wei Tan
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(6):447-456.   Published online December 28, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.01221.0174
  • 6,792 View
  • 191 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 11 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
This systematic review and meta-analysis compared the outcomes of the watch-and-wait (WW) approach versus radical surgery (RS) in rectal cancers with clinical complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Methods
This study followed the PRISMA guidelines. Major databases were searched to identify relevant articles. WW and RS were compared through meta-analyses of pooled proportions. Primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), local recurrence, and distant metastasis rates. Pooled salvage surgery rates and outcomes were also collected. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was employed to assess the risk of bias.
Results
Eleven studies including 1,112 rectal cancer patients showing cCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation were included. Of these patients, 378 were treated nonoperatively with WW, 663 underwent RS, and 71 underwent local excision. The 2-year OS (risk ratio [RR], 0.95; P = 0.94), 5-year OS (RR, 2.59; P = 0.25), and distant metastasis rates (RR, 1.05; P = 0.80) showed no significant differences between WW and RS. Local recurrence was more frequent in the WW group (RR, 6.93; P < 0.001), and 78.4% of patients later underwent salvage surgery (R0 resection rate, 97.5%). The 2-year DFS (RR, 1.58; P = 0.05) and 5-year DFS (RR, 2.07; P = 0.02) were higher among RS cases. However, after adjustment for R0 salvage surgery, DFS showed no significant between-group difference (RR, 0.82; P = 0.41).
Conclusion
Local recurrence rates are higher for WW than RS, but complete salvage surgery is often possible with similar long-term outcomes. WW is a viable strategy for rectal cancer with cCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiation, but further research is required to improve patient selection.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Watch‐and‐Wait Approach Following Neoadjuvant Chemo‐Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Single‐Center Cohort Study
    Georgi Kalev, Sylvia Buettner, Tianzuo Zhan, Ralf‐Dieter Hofheinz, Judit Boda‐Heggemann, Christoph Reissfelder, Steffen Seyfried, Georgi Vassilev, Julia Hardt
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2025; 131(4): 658.     CrossRef
  • Phase 2, Multicenter, Open-label, Nonrandomized Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Liposomal Irinotecan With 5-Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin, Followed by Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Rectal Cancer in a Watch-and-Wait Program
    César Muñoz, María-C. Riesco Martinez, Lisardo Ugidos, Pilar García-Alfonso, Rafael Alvarez-Gallego, Paloma Peinado, Carmen Toledano, Luka Mihic-Góngora, Justo Gabriel Ortega Anselmi, Enrique Sanz Garcia, Emilio Vicente, Yolanda Quijano, Hipólito J. Durán
    American Journal of Clinical Oncology.2025; 48(3): 142.     CrossRef
  • Therapeutic Management of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Existing and Prospective Approaches
    Horia-Dan Lișcu, Nicolae Verga, Dimitrie-Ionuț Atasiei, Andreea-Teodora Ilie, Maria Vrabie, Laura Roșu, Alexandra Poștaru, Stefania Glăvan, Adriana Lucaș, Maria Dinulescu, Andreea Delea, Andreea-Iuliana Ionescu
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(3): 912.     CrossRef
  • A management of patients achieving clinical complete response after neoadjuvant therapy and perspectives: on locally advanced rectal cancer
    Yu-Xin Liu, Xin-Rong Yang, Lan-Qing Peng, Zhuo-Hong Li
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • ACCORD study: a national multi‐centre study of the watch and wait approach in patients with rectal cancer in Aotearoa New Zealand

    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2025; 95(3): 440.     CrossRef
  • Watch and wait in early onset rectal cancer patients: A review of the literature
    Melissa K Drezdzon, Carrie Y Peterson
    Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2025; : 101117.     CrossRef
  • Non-operative management of locally advanced rectal cancer with an emphasis on outcomes and quality of life: a narrative review
    In Ja Park
    Ewha Medical Journal.2025; 48(3): e40.     CrossRef
  • Non-Operative Management (NOM) in Rectal Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Directions
    Vincenzo Schiavone, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo, Gianluca Mascianà, Filippo Carannante, Gianluca Costa, Valentina Miacci, Marco Caricato
    Encyclopedia.2025; 5(4): 165.     CrossRef
  • Advancing Personalized Medicine in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Francesco Giulio Sullo, Alessandro Passardi, Chiara Gallio, Chiara Molinari, Giorgia Marisi, Eleonora Pozzi, Leonardo Solaini, Alessandro Bittoni
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(9): 2562.     CrossRef
  • Tailoring rectal cancer surgery: Surgical approaches and anatomical insights during deep pelvic dissection for optimal outcomes in low‐lying rectal cancer
    Youn Young Park, Nam Kyu Kim
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2024; 8(5): 761.     CrossRef
  • Combined Transanal and Laparoscopic Approach for Full-Thickness Local Excision of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Following Near-Complete Response after Chemotherapy
    Joshua S. H. Lim, Si-Lin Koo, Iain Beehuat Tan, Isaac Seow-En
    World Journal of Colorectal Surgery.2024; 13(3): 95.     CrossRef
Original Article
Sensitivity of Various Evaluating Modalities for Predicting a Pathologic Complete Response After Preoperative Chemoradiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
Sungwoo Jung, Anuj Parajuli, Chang Sik Yu, Seong Ho Park, Jong Seok Lee, Ah Young Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Jin Cheon Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(5):275-281.   Published online October 31, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.01.07
  • 6,152 View
  • 87 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
We investigated the sensitivity of various evaluating modalities in predicting a pathologic complete response (pCR) after preoperative chemoradiation therapy (PCRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC).
Methods
From a population of 2,247 LARC patients who underwent PCRT followed by surgery at Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea from January 2007 to June 2016, we retrospectively analyzed 313 patients (14.1%) who showed a pCR after surgery. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), abdominopelvic computed tomography (AP-CT), and endoscopy were performed within 2 weeks prior to surgery.
Results
Of the 313 patients analyzed, 256 (81.8%) had a pCR after radical surgery and 57 (18.2%) showed total regression after local excision. Preoperative TRUS, MRI, and AP-CT were performed in 283, 305, and 139 patients, respectively. Among these 3 groups, a prediction of a pCR of the primary tumor was made in 41 (14.5%), 51 (16.7%), and 27 patients (19.4%), respectively, before surgery. A prediction of a clinical N0 stage was made in 204 patients (88.3%) using TRUS, 130 (52.2%) using MRI, and 78 (65.5%) using AP-CT. Of the 211 patients who underwent endoscopy, 87 (41.2%) had a mention of clinical CR in their records. A prediction of a pathologic CR was made for 124 patients (39.6%) through at least one diagnostic modality.
Conclusion
The various evaluation methods for predicting a pCR after PCRT show a predictive sensitivity of 0.15–0.41 for primary tumors and 0.52–0.88 for lymph nodes. Endoscopy is a relatively superior modality for predicting the pCR of the primary tumor of LARC patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison between Local Excision and Radical Resection for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer in ypT0-1 Patients: An Analysis of the Clinicopathological Factors and Survival Rates
    Soo Young Oh, In Ja Park, Young IL Kim, Jong-Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Cancers.2021; 13(19): 4823.     CrossRef
  • Predicting Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Using Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes Density
    Yao Xu, Xiaoying Lou, Yanting Liang, Shenyan Zhang, Shangqing Yang, Qicong Chen, Zeyan Xu, Minning Zhao, Zhenhui Li, Ke Zhao, Zaiyi Liu
    Journal of Inflammation Research.2021; Volume 14: 5891.     CrossRef
  • A Nine-Gene Signature for Predicting the Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    In Ja Park, Yun Suk Yu, Bilal Mustafa, Jin Young Park, Yong Bae Seo, Gun-Do Kim, Jinpyo Kim, Chang Min Kim, Hyun Deok Noh, Seung-Mo Hong, Yeon Wook Kim, Mi-Ju Kim, Adnan Ahmad Ansari, Luigi Buonaguro, Sung-Min Ahn, Chang-Sik Yu
    Cancers.2020; 12(4): 800.     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP