Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
32 "Complications"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Original Articles
Anorectal benign disease
Lower pain, less itching, and faster healing after ultrasound scalpel-assisted hemorrhoidectomy using an intimate cleaner containing chlorhexidine, acid hyaluronic acid, and natural anti-inflammatories: a multicenter observational case-control study
Antonio Brillantino, Luigi Marano, Maurizio Grillo, Alessio Palumbo, Fabrizio Foroni, Luciano Vicenzo, Alessio Antropoli, Michele Lanza, Maria Laura Sandoval Sotelo, Nicola Sangiuliano, Mauro Maglio, Rosanna Filosa, Lucia Abbatiello, Maria Preziosa Romano, Luana Passariello, Pasquale Talento, Giovanna Ioia, Corrado Rispoli, Mariano Fortunato Armellino, Vincenzo Bottino, Adolfo Renzi, Carlo Bartone, Luigi Monaco, Paolino Mauro, Stefano Picardi, Maria Paola Menna, Elisa Palladino, Mario Massimo Mensorio, Vinicio Mosca, Claudio Gambardella, Luigi Brusciano, Ludovico Docimo
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(6):602-609.   Published online December 30, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00570.0081
  • 841 View
  • 67 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Postoperative pain is a major concern for patients undergoing ultrasound scalpel-assisted hemorrhoidectomy, potentially exacerbated by delayed wound healing. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of an intimate cleansing gel containing chlorhexidine, hyaluronic acid, and other anti-inflammatory agents (Antroclean Fisioderm) on postoperative pain, itching, and wound healing in patients who had undergone this procedure.
Methods
This multicenter observational case-control study involved a cohort of consecutive adult patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy using an ultrasound device. The study compared 2 different postoperative wound management strategies over 1 month after surgery: washing with warm water twice per day (control group) versus a 2-minute topical application of intimate cleansing gel (Antroclean Fisioderm) followed by a warm water wash (intervention group).
Results
The median postoperative pain score was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group at each follow-up point (P<0.01). The percentage of patients reporting anal itching was also significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group at each follow-up point (P<0.01). All patients in the intervention group achieved complete wound healing 4 weeks after surgery, compared to 88 (82%) in the control group (P<0.01). No adverse events were reported.
Conclusion
The topical application of intimate cleansing gel (Antroclean Fisioderm) twice daily for 1 month following ultrasound scalpel-assisted hemorrhoidectomy appears to be associated with faster healing, reduced pain, decreased itching, and improved quality of life, without any adverse effects. Further larger and prospective randomized trials are recommended to confirm these findings.
ERAS
Impact of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program on the management of complications after laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer
Victoria Weets, Hélène Meillat, Jacques Emmanuel Saadoun, Marie Dazza, Cécile de Chaisemartin, Bernard Lelong
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(5):440-450.   Published online September 20, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00850.0121
  • 2,401 View
  • 101 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) reduces postoperative complications (POCs) after colorectal surgery; however, its impact on the management of POCs remains unclear. This study compared the diagnosis and management of POCs before and after implementing our ERAS protocol after laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer and examined the short- and mid-term oncologic impacts.
Methods
This single-center, retrospective study evaluated all consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer between 2012 and 2021, focusing on the incidence of POCs within 90 days. We compared outcomes before (standard group) and after (ERAS group) the implementation of our ERAS protocol in January 2016.
Results
Significantly fewer patients in the ERAS group developed POCs (standard vs. ERAS, 136 of 380 patients [35.8%] vs.136 of 660 patients [20.6%]; P<0.01). The ERAS group had a significantly shorter mean total length of stay after POCs (13.1 days vs. 11.4 days, P=0.04), and the rates of life-threatening complications (6.7% vs. 0.7%) and 1-year mortality (7.4% vs. 1.5%) were significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the standard group. Among patients with anastomotic complications, laparoscopic reoperation was significantly more common in the ERAS group than in the standard group (8.3% vs. 75.0%, P<0.01). Among patients with postoperative ileus, the diagnosis and recovery times were significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the standard group, resulting in a shorter total length of stay (13.5 days vs. 10 days, P<0.01).
Conclusion
The implementation of an ERAS protocol did not eliminate all POCs, but it did accelerate their diagnosis and management and improved patient outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Optimizing postoperative pain management in minimally invasive colorectal surgery
    Soo Young Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 525.     CrossRef
Anorectal benign disease
Immediate sphincter repair following fistulotomy for anal fistula: does it impact the healing rate and septic complications?
Maher A. Abbas, Anna T. Tsay, Mohammad Abbass
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(3):217-224.   Published online June 28, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.01144.0163
  • 2,608 View
  • 226 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Fistulotomy is considered the most effective treatment for anal fistula; however, it carries a risk of incontinence. Sphincteroplasty in the setting of fistulotomy is not standard practice due to concerns regarding healing and potential infectious complications. We aimed to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent fistulotomy with primary sphincteroplasty to those who did not undergo repair.
Methods
This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent fistulotomy for cryptoglandular anal fistula. All operations were performed by one colorectal surgeon. Sphincteroplasty was performed for patients perceived to be at higher risk for continence disturbance. The main outcome measures were the healing rate and postoperative septic complications.
Results
In total, 152 patients were analyzed. Group A (fistulotomy with sphincteroplasty) consisted of 45 patients and group B (fistulotomy alone) included 107 patients. Both groups were similar in age (P=0.16) and sex (P=0.20). Group A had higher proportions of multiple fistulas (26.7% vs. 6.5%, P<0.01) and complex fistulas (mid to high transsphincteric, 37.8% vs. 10.3%; P<0.01) than group B. The median follow-up time was 8 weeks. The overall healing rate was similar in both groups (93.3% vs. 90.6%, P=0.76). No significant difference between the 2 groups was noted in septic complications (6.7% vs. 3.7%, P=0.42).
Conclusion
Fistulotomy with primary sphincter repair demonstrated a comparable healing rate to fistulotomy alone, without an increased risk of postoperative septic complications. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings and to explore the functional outcomes of patients who undergo sphincteroplasty.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Achieving a high cure rate in complex anal fistulas: understanding the conceptual role of the Garg cardinal principles
    Pankaj Garg, Nicola Clemente, James C. W. Khaw
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 521.     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
Long-term bowel functional outcomes following anal sphincter-preserving surgery for upper and middle rectal cancer: a single-center longitudinal study
Ahmad Sakr, Seung Yoon Yang, Min Soo Cho, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(1):27-35.   Published online February 28, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.01067.0152
  • 2,127 View
  • 183 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Despite advances in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and anal sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer, bowel dysfunction is still unavoidable and negatively affects patients’ quality of life. In this longitudinal study, we aimed to investigate the changes in bowel function with follow-up time and the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on bowel function following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Methods
In this study, 171 patients with upper or middle rectal cancer who underwent low anterior resection between 2012 and 2018 were included. Bowel function was assessed longitudinally with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument and Wexner scores every 6 months after restoration of bowel continuity. Patients with at least 2 follow-up visits were included.
Results
Overall, 100 patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Urgency, soilage, and fecal incontinence were noted within 24 months in the patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. After 2 years of follow-up, significant bowel dysfunction and fecal incontinence were observed in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group. Low tumor level and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were associated with delayed bowel dysfunction.
Conclusion
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in combination with low tumor level was significantly associated with delayed bowel dysfunction even after 2 years of follow-up. Therefore, careful selection and discussion with patients are paramount.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
    Jae Seung Kim, Jaram Lee, Hyeung-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4280.     CrossRef
  • Beyond survival: a comprehensive review of quality of life in rectal cancer patients
    Won Beom Jung
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 527.     CrossRef
Technical Note
Can the Heald anal stent help to reduce anastomotic or rectal stump leak in elective and emergency colorectal surgery? A single-center experience
Michael Jones, Brendan Moran, Richard John Heald, John Bunni
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(1):82-85.   Published online February 26, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00038.0005
  • 2,490 View
  • 194 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Anastomotic and rectal stump leaks are feared complications of colorectal surgery. Diverting stomas are commonly used to protect low rectal anastomoses but can have adverse effects. Studies have reported favorable outcomes for transanal drainage devices instead of diverting stomas. We describe our use of the Heald anal stent and its potential impact in reducing anastomotic or rectal stump leak after elective or emergency colorectal surgery. We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of patients in whom a Heald anal stent had been used to “protect” a colorectal anastomosis or a rectal stump, in an elective or emergency context, for benign and malignant pathology. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were reviewed using clinical and radiological records. The Heald anal stent was used in 93 patients over 4 years. Forty-six cases (49%) had a colorectal anastomosis, and 47 (51%) had an end stoma with a rectal stump. No anastomotic or rectal stump leaks were recorded. We recommend the Heald anal stent as a simple and affordable adjunct that may decrease anastomotic and rectal stump leak by reducing intraluminal pressure through drainage of fluid and gas.
Original Articles
Stoma
Protective loop ileostomy or colostomy? A risk evaluation of all common complications
Yi-Wen Yang, Sheng-Chieh Huang, Hou-Hsuan Cheng, Shih-Ching Chang, Jeng-Kai Jiang, Huann-Sheng Wang, Chun-Chi Lin, Hung-Hsin Lin, Yuan-Tzu Lan
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(6):580-587.   Published online January 27, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00710.0101
  • 3,980 View
  • 213 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Protective ileostomy and colostomy are performed in patients undergoing low anterior resection with a high leakage risk. We aimed to compare surgical, medical, and daily care complications between these 2 ostomies in order to make individual choice.
Methods
Patients who underwent low anterior resection for rectal tumors with protective stomas between January 2011 and September 2018 were enrolled. Stoma-related complications were prospectively recorded by wound, ostomy, and continence nurses. The cancer stage and treatment data were obtained from the Taiwan Cancer Database of our Big Data Center. Other demographic data were collected retrospectively from medical notes. The complications after stoma creation and after the stoma reversal were compared.
Results
There were 176 patients with protective colostomy and 234 with protective ileostomy. Protective ileostomy had higher proportions of high output from the stoma for 2 consecutive days than protective colostomy (11.1% vs. 0%, P<0.001). Protective colostomy resulted in more stoma retraction than protective ileostomy (21.6% vs. 9.4%, P=0.001). Female, open operation, ileostomy, and carrying stoma more than 4 months were also significantly associated with a higher risk of stoma-related complications during diversion. For stoma retraction, the multivariate analysis revealed that female (odds ratio [OR], 4.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.13–7.69; P<0.001) and long diversion duration (≥4 months; OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.22–4.43; P=0.010) were independent risk factors, but ileostomy was an independent favorable factor (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22–0.72; P=0.003). The incidence of complication after stoma reversal did not differ between colostomy group and ileostomy group (24.3% vs. 20.9%, P=0.542).
Conclusion
We suggest avoiding colostomy in patients who are female and potential prolonged diversion when stoma retraction is a concern. Otherwise, ileostomy should be avoided for patients with impaired renal function. Wise selection and flexibility are more important than using one type of stoma routinely.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Gut microbiome and plasma metabolome alterations in ileostomy and after closure of ileostomy
    Liang Xu, Xiaolong Li, Lang Chen, Haitao Ma, Ying Wang, Wenwen Liu, Anyan Liao, Liang Tan, Xiao Gao, Weidong Xiao, Hua Yang, Guangyan Ji, Yuan Qiu, Wei-Hua Chen, Qin Liu, Song Liu, Yang Yang
    Microbiology Spectrum.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Uso de ileostomía derivativa en cáncer de ovario. Revisión de la literatura
    Franco Rafael Ruiz-Echeverría, Pedro Hernando Calderón-Quiroz, Juliana Rendón-Hernández
    Revista Colombiana de Cirugía.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Meta-analysis: loop ileostomy versus colostomy to prevent complications of anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Shilai Yang, Gang Tang, Yudi Zhang, Zhengqiang Wei, Donglin Du
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Role of Colon in Isolated Intestinal Transplantation: Description of 4 Cases
    Pierpaolo Di Cocco, Giulia Bencini, Alessandro Martinino, Egor Petrochenkov, Stepan Akshelyan, Kentaro Yoshikawa, Mario Spaggiari, Jorge Almario-Alvarez, Ivo Tzvetanov, Enrico Benedetti, Gaetano Gallo
    International Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
Anorectal benign disease
The importance of compression time in stapled hemorrhoidopexy: is patience a virtue?
Byung Eun Yoo, Wook Ho Kang, Yong Teak Ko, Young Chan Lee, Cheong Ho Lim
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(2):176-181.   Published online December 20, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00556.0079
  • 2,533 View
  • 135 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether longer compression time before firing the stapler reduced the postoperative complications related to staple line formation in stapled hemorrhoidopexy.
Methods
This retrospective case-control study was conducted at a colorectal-anal specialty hospital. Consecutive patients with grades III and IV hemorrhoids who underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy between January 2016 and November 2019 were included. According to the compression time, patients were assigned to the long compression time group (2 minutes) or the typical compression time group (30 seconds). The primary outcome measure was incidence of staple line complications such as dehiscence, bleeding, and stenosis.
Results
A total of 348 patients treated with stapled hemorrhoidopexy were evaluated. Seventy-three and 275 patients were included in the long compression time group and the typical compression time group, respectively. No significant differences were observed in patient characteristics between the groups. However, additional procedures were performed more frequently in the typical compression time group (78.1% vs. 92.0%, P=0.001). Bleeding occurred more frequently in the typical compression time group (1.4% vs. 8.4%, P=0.030). The rates of dehiscence and stenosis were not significantly different between the groups. Fecal urgency developed more frequently in the typical compression time group (0% vs. 5.1%, P=0.040). In logistic regression analysis, typical compression time (30 seconds) was the only risk factor for bleeding (odds ratio, 8.496; P=0.040).
Conclusion
Longer compression time was associated with a decreased incidence of postoperative bleeding after stapled hemorrhoidopexy.
Surgical management of retrorectal tumors: a single-center 12 years’ experience
Amirhosein Naseri, Behnam Behboudi, Ali Faryabi, Seyed Mohsen Ahmadi Tafti, Amirsina Sharifi, Mohammad Reza Keramati, Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli, Amir Keshvari, Mehdi Zeinalizadeh, Reza Akbari Asbagh, Niloufar Hoorshad, Alireza Kazemeini
Received April 26, 2022  Accepted June 23, 2022  Published online October 11, 2022  
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00297.0042    [Epub ahead of print]
  • 3,276 View
  • 87 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Retrorectal tumors (RTs) are rare tumors that arise in the space between the mesorectum and the pelvic wall and often originate in embryonic tissues. The primary treatment for these tumors is complete excision surgery, and choosing the best surgical approach is very important.
Methods
In this study, we retrospectively collected the data of 15 patients with RTs who underwent surgery in Imam Khomeini Hospital (Tehran, Iran) for 12 years to share our experiences of patients’ treatment and compare different surgical approaches.
Results
A total of 5 tumors were malignant, 10 were benign, and most of the tumors were congenital. Malignant tumors were seen in older patients. Three surgical procedures were performed on patients. Three patients underwent abdominal approach surgery, and 8 patients underwent posterior surgery. A combined surgical approach was performed on 4 patients. Two patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. The abdominal approach had the least long-term complication, and the combined approach had the most complications; laparoscopic surgery reduced the length of hospital stay and complications after surgery.
Conclusion
A multidisciplinary team collaboration using magnetic resonance imaging details is necessary to determine a surgical treatment approach. It could reduce the need for a preoperative biopsy. However, every approach has its advantages and disadvantages, and individualized treatment is the key.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Tailgut Cyst—Gynecologist’s Pitfall: Literature Review and Case Report
    Andrei Mihai Malutan, Viorela-Elena Suciu, Florin Laurentiu Ignat, Doru Diculescu, Razvan Ciortea, Emil-Claudiu Boțan, Carmen Elena Bucuri, Maria Patricia Roman, Ionel Nati, Cristina Ormindean, Dan Mihu
    Diagnostics.2025; 15(1): 108.     CrossRef
Malignant disease,Colorectal cancer,Complication,Biomarker & risk factor
Presepsin (soluble CD14 subtype) as a risk factor for the development of infectious and inflammatory complications in operated colorectal cancer patients
Kayrat Shakeyev, Yermek Turgunov, Alina Ogizbayeva, Olga Avdiyenko, Miras Mugazov, Sofiko Grigolashvili, Ilya Azizov
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(6):442-448.   Published online April 4, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00115.0016
  • 3,762 View
  • 131 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
In this pilot study the dynamic of presepsin (soluble CD14 subtype, sCD14-ST) in blood serum was assessed as a possible risk factor for the development of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) and infectious and inflammatory complications in operated colorectal cancer patients.
Methods
To determine sCD14-ST by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method venous blood was taken 1 hour before surgery and 72 hours after it (3rd day). The presence of SIRS and organ dysfunctions (ODs) according to the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scale were assessed.
Results
Thiry-six patients with colorectal cancer were enrolled in the study. sCD14-ST level before surgery was 269.8±103.1 pg/mL (interquartile range [IQR], 196.7–327.1 pg/mL). Despite the presepsin level on the 3rd day being higher (291.1±136.5 pg/mL; IQR, 181.2–395.5 pg/mL), there was no statistical significance in its dynamics (P=0.437). sCD14-ST value both before surgery and on the 3rd day after it was significantly higher in patients with bowel obstruction (P=0.038 and P=0.007). sCD14-ST level before surgery above 330 pg/mL showed an increase in the probability of complications, SIRS, and OD (odds ratio [OR], 5.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–28.2; OR, 7.0; 95% CI, 1.3–36.7; and OR, 13.0; 95% CI, 1.1–147.8; respectively). Patients with OD had higher levels on the 3rd day after surgery (P=0.049).
Conclusion
sCD14-ST level in operated colorectal cancer patients was much higher if they were admitted with complication like bowel obstruction. Higher preoperative levels of sCD14-ST increase the probability of postoperative complications, SIRS, and OD. Therefore, further studies with large sample size are needed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
Risk factors for prolonged hospitalization and delayed treatment completion after laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis
Jiyoung Shin, Myong Hoon Ihn, Kyung Sik Kim, Sang Hyun Kim, Jihyoun Lee, Sangchul Yun, Sung Woo Cho
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(1):50-58.   Published online November 18, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00773.0110
  • 4,110 View
  • 155 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
We sought to identify the risk factors for prolonged hospitalization and delayed treatment completion after laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis.
Methods
The study retrospectively analyzed 497 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomies for uncomplicated appendicitis between January 2018 and December 2020. The patients were divided into an early discharge group (≤2 days) and a late discharge group (>2 days) based on the length of hospital stay (LOS). The patients were also divided into uneventful and complicated groups according to the need for additional treatment after standard follow-up.
Results
Thirty-seven patients (7.4%) were included in the late discharge group. The mean LOS of the late discharge groups was 3.9 days. There were significant differences according to age, preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP), and operative time between the 2 groups. Only operative time was significantly associated with prolonged LOS in multivariate analysis. Thirty-five patients (7.0%) were included in the complicated group. The mean duration of treatment in the uneventful and complicated groups was 7.4 and 25.3 days, respectively. Significant differences existed between the uneventful and complicated groups in preoperative body temperature, preoperative CRP levels, maximal appendix diameter, and the presence of appendicoliths. In multivariate analysis, preoperative CRP levels and maximal appendix diameter were independent predictors of delayed treatment completion.
Conclusion
Shorter operative time is desirable to ensure minimal hospital stay in patients with uncomplicated appendicitis. Further efforts are needed to ensure that patients with uncomplicated appendicitis do not experience delayed treatment completion after laparoscopic appendectomies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparative Outcomes of Immediate and Delayed Wound Closure Techniques in Appendectomies for Gangrenous Appendicitis
    Anzar Usman, Esha Akbar, Aliha Mukhtar, Iqra Nasir, Usama Rehman, Adil Iqbal, Muhammad Rashid, Muhammad Umar
    DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICO-LIFE-SCIENCES.2024; 1(3): 35.     CrossRef
  • Non-linear association between C-reactive protein levels and length of stay in pediatric appendicitis patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy
    Ming Liu, Ping Yang, Yunpeng Gou
    Frontiers in Pediatrics.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Nomogram prediction model for length of hospital stay following laparoscopic appendectomy in pediatric patients: a retrospective study
    Ming Liu, Ping Yang, Yunpeng Gou, Qiang Chen, Dong Xu
    Frontiers in Pediatrics.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
Benign proctology,Complication,Biomarker & risk factor
Frequency and risk factors of severe postoperative bleeding after proctological surgery: a retrospective case-control study
Sarah Taieb, Patrick Atienza, Jean-David Zeitoun, Milad Taouk, Josée Bourguignon, Christian Thomas, Nabila Rabahi, Saliha Dahlouk, Anne-Carole Lesage, David Lobo, Isabelle Etienney
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(5):370-375.   Published online July 27, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00122.0017
  • 4,229 View
  • 160 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The aim of this study was to assess frequency and risk factors of severe bleeding after proctological surgery requiring hemostatic surgery observed after publication of the French guidelines for anticoagulant and platelet-inhibitor treatment.
Methods
All patients who underwent proctological surgery between January 2012 and March 2017 in a referral center were included. Delay, severity of bleeding, and need for blood transfusion were recorded. Patients with severe postoperative bleeding were matched to controls at a 2:1 ratio adjusted on the operator, and the type of surgery.
Results
Among the 8,890 operated patients, 65 (0.7%) needed a postoperative hemostatic procedure in an operating room. The risk of a hemostatic surgery was significantly increased after hemorrhoidal surgery compared with other procedures (1.9% vs. 0.5%, P<10–4) and was most frequent after Milligan-Morgan hemorrhoidectomy (2.5%). Mean bleeding time was 6.2 days and no bleeding occurred after day 15. Blood transfusion rate was 0.1%. Treatment with anticoagulants and platelet inhibitors were managed according to recommendations and did not increase the severity of bleeding. The risk of severe bleeding was significantly lower in active smokers vs. non-smokers in univariate (16.9% vs. 36.2%, P=0.007) and multivariate (odds ratio, 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.14–0.65) analysis whereas sex, age, and body mass were not significantly associated with bleeding.
Conclusion
Severe postoperative bleeding occurs in 0.7% of patients, but varies with type of procedure and is not affected by anticoagulant or antiplatelet treatment. These treatments given in accordance with the new guidelines do not increase the severity of postoperative bleeding.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacy of Endoscopic Evaluation and Hemostatic Intervention for Post-hemorrhoidectomy Bleeding
    Katsuhisa Ohashi, Katsuhide Ohashi, Akinori Sasaki, Kazuyoshi Ota, Kazutomo Kitagawa
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2025; 9(1): 162.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Clinical Manifestations of Hemorrhoidal Disease, Carried Out Surgeries and Prolapsed Anorectal Tissues: Associations with ABO Blood Groups of Patients
    Inese Fišere, Valērija Groma, Šimons Svirskis, Estere Strautmane, Andris Gardovskis
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(15): 5119.     CrossRef
  • Sclerobanding in the treatment of second and third degree hemorrhoidal disease in high risk patients on antiplatelet/anticoagulant therapy without suspension: a pilot study
    Francesco Pata, Luigi M. Bracchitta, Bruno Nardo, Gaetano Gallo, Giancarlo D’Ambrosio, Salvatore Bracchitta
    Frontiers in Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Principles of minimize bleeding and the transfusion of blood and its components in operated patients – surgical aspects
    Tomasz Banasiewicz, Waldemar Machała, Maciej Borejsza Wysocki, Maciej Lesiak, Sebastian Krych, Małgorzata Lange, Piotr Hogendorf, Adam Durczyński, Jarosław Cwaliński, Tomasz Bartkowiak, Adam Dziki, Wojciech Kielan, Stanisław Kłęk, Łukasz Krokowicz, Krzysz
    Polish Journal of Surgery.2023; 95(5): 14.     CrossRef
Review
Malignant disease
How to Prevent Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Surgery? A Systematic Review
Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Tarek Kellil, Camillia Jeddi, Ahmed Saidani, Faouzi Chebbi, Khadija Zouari
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):213-222.   Published online August 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.05.14.2
  • 7,534 View
  • 351 Download
  • 21 Web of Science
  • 29 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Anastomosis leakage (AL) after colorectal surgery is an embarrassing problem. It is associated with poor consequence. This review aims to summarize published evidence on prevention of AL after colorectal surgery and provide recommendations according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. We conducted bibliographic research on January 15, 2020, of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Scopus, and Google Scholar. We retained meta-analysis, reviews, and randomized clinical trials. We concluded that mechanical bowel preparation did not reduce AL. It seems that oral antibiotic or oral antibiotic with mechanical bowel preparation could reduce the risk of AL. The surgical approach did not affect the AL rate. The low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery could reduce the AL rate. The mechanical anastomosis is superior to handsewn anastomosis only in case of right colectomies, with similar results in rectal surgery between the 2 anastomosis techniques. In the case of right colectomies, this anastomosis could be performed intracorporeally or extracorporeally with similar outcomes. The air leak test did not reduce AL. There is no interest of external drainage in colonic surgery but drains reduced the rate of AL and rate of reoperation after low anterior resection. The transanal tube reduced the rate of AL.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Caring for a patient with appendiceal cancer
    Richard L. Pullen
    Nursing.2025; 55(2): 16.     CrossRef
  • Collagen patch cover facilitates recovery of bowel function after laparoscopic colectomy
    Pin-Yang Huang, Meng-Che Tsai, Kee-Thai Kiu, Min-Hsuan Yen, Tung-Cheng Chang
    BMC Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of the starch-based anti-adhesive agent 4DryField PH on anastomotic healing after rectal surgery
    Simon Stoerzer, Markus Winny, Oliver Beetz, Severin Jacobi, Juergen Klempnauer, Daniel Poehnert
    International Journal of Surgery Open.2024; 62(1): 6.     CrossRef
  • Bowel preparation for elective colectomy in Crohn's disease: results from a global cohort study using the NSQIP database
    Gustavo Yano Callado, Rodrigo Moisés de Almeida Leite, Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo, Leandro Cardoso Barchi, Waleed Seddiq, Isabela Passarin Correa, Ulysses Ribeiro Junior, Rocco Ricciardi
    Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(4): 709.     CrossRef
  • Does transanal endomicrosurgery affects the results of “salvage mesorectumectomy” for patients with early rectal cancer? Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Ph. I. Kirgizov, S. V. Chernyshov, M. A. Nagudov, E. G. Rybakov
    Surgery and Oncology.2024; 14(1): 11.     CrossRef
  • Anastomotic leak rate following the implementation of a powered circular stapler in elective colorectal surgeries: a retrospective cohort study
    Jessica J. Lie, Nadeesha Samarasinghe, Ahmer A. Karimuddin, Carl J. Brown, P. Terry Phang, Manoj J. Raval, Amandeep Ghuman
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(10): 5541.     CrossRef
  • Morbidity and Mortality after Cytoreductive Surgery and HIPEC in a National Reference Center: A Six-Year Experience under Independent Evaluation
    Miguel Enrique Alberto Vilchez, Sebastian Halskov, Axel Winter, Johann Pratschke, Beate Rau, Safak Gül
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(17): 5182.     CrossRef
  • Recommendations for the perioperative management of pancreatic and colorectal cancer patients
    Tim O. Vilz, Stefan Post, Thomas Langer, Markus Follmann, Monika Nothacker, Maria A. Willis
    Deutsches Ärzteblatt international.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Entre luces y sombras: Factores clave en la fuga anastomótica en cirugía colorrectal, estudio de casos y controles en dos centros de alto volumen en Bogotá
    Carolina Riscanevo-Bobadilla, Diego Efrain Valbuena, Andrés Felipe Salcedo-Young, Ronel Eduardo Barbosa, Wilmar Martin, Angela Navas, Daniel Franco
    Revista Colombiana de Cirugía.2024; : 99.     CrossRef
  • UNEXPECTED FINDINGS DURING LAPAROTOMY SURGERY AND URGENT SURGICAL INDICATIONS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS IN PATIENTS WITH CROHN’S DISEASE
    Guilherme Zupo TEIXEIRA, Magaly Gemio TEIXEIRA, Marina Carla GIMENEZ, Silvia Caroline Neves RIBEIRO, Nathacia Bernardo CHIMELLO, Vania Aparecida LEANDRO-MERHI
    ABCD. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cirurgia Digestiva (São Paulo).2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic colectomy with CME versus laparoscopic colon resection with or without CME for colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    H Oweira, C Reissfelder, H Elhadedy, N Rahbari, A Mehrabi, W Fattal, JS Khan, MA Chaouch
    The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England.2023; 105(2): 113.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Anastomotic Leak Prevention during Elective Colorectal Surgery: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Lidia Castagneto-Gissey, Maria Francesca Russo, James Casella-Mariolo, Angelo Serao, Rosa Marcellinaro, Vito D’Andrea, Massimo Carlini, Giovanni Casella
    Antibiotics.2023; 12(2): 397.     CrossRef
  • Refractory Retroperitoneal Abscess Due to Anastomosis Leakage after Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision Combined with Robotic Rectal Resection with Diverting Ileostomy: A Case Report
    Yuichiro Nishida, Yuto Hozaka, Shinichiro Mori, Masumi Wada, Kan Tanabe, Yoshiaki Kita, Takaaki Arigami, Akihiro Nakajo, Michiyo Higashi, Hiroshi Kurahara, Takao Ohtsuka
    The Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery.2023; 56(3): 180.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of transanal drainage tube in preventing anastomotic leakage after surgery for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis
    Shiki Fujino, Masayoshi Yasui, Masayuki Ohue, Norikatsu Miyoshi
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 15(6): 1202.     CrossRef
  • Surgical aspects of stoma formation in oncology. Literature review
    A. S. Gorbunova, D. V. Kuzmichev, Z. Z. Mamedli, A. A. Aniskin, A. V. Polinovsky, D. V. Aleksantsev, A. V. Korshak
    Pelvic Surgery and Oncology.2023; 13(2): 54.     CrossRef
  • How to prevent postoperative ileus in colorectal surgery? a systematic review
    Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Mohamed Aziz Daghmouri, Abdallah Lahdheri, Mohammad Iqbal Hussain, Salsabil Nasri, Amine Gouader, Faouzi Noomen, Hani Oweira
    Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2023; 85(9): 4501.     CrossRef
  • Possible role of features of the intestinal microbiome in patients with colorectal cancer as a cause of anastomotic leak
    P. V. Kosareva, R. A. Konev, A. P. Godovalov, L. V. Sivakova, E. I. Samodelkin
    Bulletin of Siberian Medicine.2023; 22(3): 120.     CrossRef
  • Fluorescence-guided colorectal surgery: applications, clinical results, and protocols
    Jin-Min Jung, In Ja Park, Eun Jung Park, Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 252.     CrossRef
  • Pelvic exenteration for gynecologic malignancies: The experience of a tertiary center from Greece
    Dimitrios Haidopoulos, Vasilios Pergialiotis, Kyveli Aggelou, Nikolaos Thomakos, Nikolaos Alexakis, Emmanouil Stamatakis, Alexandros Rodolakis
    Surgical Oncology.2022; 40: 101702.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin on POD3 for the early diagnosis of anastomotic leakage after colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis and systematic review
    Zheng'ao Xu, Rui Zong, Yu Zhang, Jie Chen, Weidong Liu
    International Journal of Surgery.2022; 100: 106592.     CrossRef
  • Immediate results of rectal resections for cancer in depending on the restoration of the integrity of the pelvic peritoneal floor: retrospective study
    M.  S.  Lebedko, S.  S.  Gordeev, S.   G. Gaydarov, Z.   Z. Mamedli, V.  Yu.  Kosyrev, A.  A.  Aniskin, S.  O.  Kochkina
    Pelvic Surgery and Oncology.2022; 11(3-4): 23.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic PME with colorectal anstomosis with transanal control – A video vignette
    Francesco Crafa, Serafino Vanella, Adele Noviello, Giuseppe Longo, Francesco Longo
    Colorectal Disease.2022; 24(7): 887.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for colorectal anastomotic leakage and preventive measures: a retrospective cohort study
    M. S. Lebedko, S. S. Gordeev, E. V. Alieva, M. D. Sivolob, Z. Z. Mamedli, S. G. Gaydarov, V. Yu. Kosyrev
    Pelvic Surgery and Oncology.2022; 12(2): 17.     CrossRef
  • Surgical safety in the COVID-19 era: present and future considerations
    Young Il Kim, In Ja Park
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 102(6): 295.     CrossRef
  • Colonic splenic flexure resection with an end‐to‐end intracorporeal anastomosis using a circular stapler – A video vignette
    Roberto Secchi del Rio, Jose Ignacio Ortiz de Elguea‐Lizarraga, Paulina Muñoz‐Ledo Ceron, Eli Castillo, Victor Gerardo Pena, Diego Marines Copado
    Colorectal Disease.2022; 24(11): 1447.     CrossRef
  • Как предотвратить несостоятельность кишечных анастомозов «высокого риска»
    Эльчин Агаев, Зульфия Исмайылова, Мушвиг Гасанов
    InterConf.2022; (26(129)): 283.     CrossRef
  • Safe Anastomoses without Ostomies in Cytoreductive Surgery with Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy: Technical Considerations and Modifications
    Pedro Barrios, Isabel Ramos, Oriol Crusellas, Domenico Sabia, Sergio Mompart, Lana Bijelic
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2021; 28(12): 7784.     CrossRef
  • Early salvage total mesorectal excision (sTME) after organ preservation failure in rectal cancer does not worsen postoperative outcomes compared to primary TME: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Jim Khan, Talvinder Singh Gill, Arianeb Mehrabi, Christoph Reissfelder, Nuh Rahberi, Hazem Elhadedy, Hani Oweira
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(11): 2375.     CrossRef
  • Regional techniques for pain management following laparoscopic elective colonic resection: A systematic review
    Mohamed Aziz Daghmouri, Mohamed Ali Chaouch, Maroua Oueslati, Lotfi Rebai, Hani Oweira
    Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2021; 72: 103124.     CrossRef
Case Report
Benign GI diease,Complication
Transmural Mesh Migration From the Abdominal Wall to the Rectum After Hernia Repair Using a Prolene Mesh: A Case Report
Yujin Lee, Byung-Noe Bae
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(Suppl 1):S28-S33.   Published online May 15, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.04.19
  • 4,037 View
  • 83 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Mesh erosion or migration is a rare and late complication after hernia repair. Its incidence is increasing as the utilization of prosthetic mesh gains popularity for abdominal hernia repair. However, mesh migration is exceedingly rare and its clinical presentation is atypical and diverse. Therefore, the management of mesh migration should be individualized to each patient. This research reports the case of a 94-year-old man with transmural migration of Prolene mesh (Ethicon) from the abdominal wall to the rectum 14 years after incisional hernia repair. He presented with only chronic abdominal pain and constipation. Migration of the mesh and a fistula between the right abdominal wall and transverse colon was observed on computed tomography. The mesh was evacuated manually from the anus without any sequelae. These findings made this case atypical, since complete transluminal migration of mesh is exceedingly rare and mesh erosion or migration requires surgical treatment in many cases.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • An unlikely path: hernia mesh migration
    Ana Rita Ferreira, Bárbara Castro, Catarina Ortigosa, Sílvia Costa, Bela Pereira, Manuel Oliveira
    European Surgery.2024; 56(1-2): 39.     CrossRef
  • Spontaneous Migration of Intraperitoneal Mesh into Rectum following Ventral Hernia Repair
    Aruna R. Patil, Ravishankar Bhat, Madhusudhana Basavarajappa
    Journal of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology.2023; 06(01): 053.     CrossRef
  • Gastrocutaneous fistula caused by mesh migration following diaphragmatic rupture repair
    Yuan Zhang, Jun Peng, Xingui Wu, Dingjiao Zhu, Yaozhi Chen
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2023; 93(4): 1042.     CrossRef
  • Enterocutaneous fistula from a mesh eroding the small bowel after incisional hernia repair
    Michael L. Lorentziadis, Moustafa Mahmoud Nafady Hego, Fatma Al Nasser
    International Journal of Abdominal Wall and Hernia Surgery.2023; 6(1): 48.     CrossRef
  • Does intraperitoneal mesh increase the risk of bowel obstruction? A nationwide French analysis
    Théophile Delorme, Jonathan Cottenet, Fawaz Abo-Alhassan, Alain Bernard, Pablo Ortega-Deballon, Catherine Quantin
    Hernia.2023; 28(2): 419.     CrossRef
  • A Cecal Surprise
    Muhammad B. Hammami, Jean-Pierre Raufman
    Gastroenterology.2022; 162(7): 1847.     CrossRef
  • Mesh on the move: a case report of total transmural surgical mesh migration causing bowel obstruction
    Joseph Ryan Leach, Bryan Manoukian, Lygia Stewart
    Clinical Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 14(1): 136.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Benign proctology,Functional outcome
The Long-term Effect of Standardized Anal Dilatation for Chronic Anal Fissure on Anal Continence
Ilia Pinsk, David Czeiger, Daria Lichtman, Avraham Reshef
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(2):115-119.   Published online March 16, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.03.16
  • 4,867 View
  • 206 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 9 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
For the past several decades, internal anal sphincterotomy has generally been considered to be the standard operation for an anal fissure. However, wound complications inherent in this operation forced surgeons to look for an alternative form of treatment. The aim of our study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of anal dilatation for chronic anal fissure, especially possible negative impact on anal sphincter function.
Methods
The study was approved by the local Institutional Review Board and given a waiver of written consent. A phone call survey was undertaken among a group of consecutive patients who had an anal dilatation by standardized technique for chronic anal fissure for the period between 2000 and 2016. The survey included medical, obstetrical and surgical-related data, Wexner fecal incontinence score, recurrence of the anal fissure, and the need for additional medical intervention. Five hundred 48 patients were identified after limitations of age, concomitant pathology, and procedures that were applied to the hospital computerized database. Eighty-five patients (group A) agreed to participate in the survey and 463 patients did not.
Results
There were no differences between groups in demographic information and medical records data; therefore, group A may well represent a satisfactory sample of the whole group. The interval between the procedure and the survey was 6.8 ± 2.7 years. The Wexner incontinence score was 0 in 94% of patients.
Conclusion
Anal dilatation, performed in a systematic and standardized way, has a successful outcome with no complications and has no clear long-term negative impact on anal sphincter function.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Сontrolled circular dilatation and lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissures associated with hemorrhoids III-IV
    Z. Z. Kamaeva, A. Yu. Titov, R. Yu. Khryukin, I. S. Anosov, Yu. A. Shelygin
    Koloproktologia.2024; 23(1): 42.     CrossRef
  • Modern trends and priority in treatment of chronic anal fissure
    S. A. Aliev, E. S. Aliev
    Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery.2024; 183(4): 77.     CrossRef
  • New Findings at the Internal Anal Sphincter on Cadaveric Dissection and Review of Sphincter-Related Surgery in a Newer Prospective
    Aswini Kumar Pujahari
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2023; 85(3): 585.     CrossRef
  • A systematic review of translation and experimental studies on internal anal sphincter for fecal incontinence
    Minsung Kim, Bo-Young Oh, Ji-Seon Lee, Dogeon Yoon, Wook Chun, Il Tae Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(3): 183.     CrossRef
  • The role of dilatation methods and lateral subcutaneous sphincterotomy in the internal anal sphincter spasm treatment (systematic literature review and meta-analysis)
    Z. Z. Kamaeva, A. Yu. Titov, A. A. Ponomarenko, R. Yu. Khrukin, I. S. Anosov, Yu. A. Shelygin
    Hirurg (Surgeon).2022; (4): 19.     CrossRef
  • Is It a Refractory Disease?- Fecal Incontinence; beyond Medication
    Chungyeop Lee, Jong Lyul Lee
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The role of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a systematic review
    Konstantinos Perivoliotis, Ioannis Baloyiannis, Dimitrios Ragias, Nikolaos Beis, Despoina Papageorgouli, Emmanouil Xydias, Konstantinos Tepetes
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(11): 2337.     CrossRef
  • Anorectal emergencies: WSES-AAST guidelines
    Antonio Tarasconi, Gennaro Perrone, Justin Davies, Raul Coimbra, Ernest Moore, Francesco Azzaroli, Hariscine Abongwa, Belinda De Simone, Gaetano Gallo, Giorgio Rossi, Fikri Abu-Zidan, Vanni Agnoletti, Gianluigi de’Angelis, Nicola de’Angelis, Luca Ansaloni
    World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Safety and efficacy of the treatment of chronic anal fissure by lateral internal sphincterotomy: A retrospective cohort study
    Fatma Al-thoubaity
    Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2020; 57: 291.     CrossRef
Malignant disease, Functional outcomes
Safety and Efficacy of Single-Port Laparoscopic Ileostomy in Palliative Settings
Seng-Muk Kang, Jung Rae Cho, Heung-Kwon Oh, Eun-Ju Lee, Min Hyun Kim, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(1):17-21.   Published online February 29, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.04.25
  • 4,058 View
  • 79 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Single-port laparoscopic techniques can be optimized with confined incisions. This approach has an intraoperative advantage of excellent visualization of the correct intestinal segment for exteriorization, along with direct visual control of the extraction to avoid twisting. However, only a few studies have verified the efficacy of the technique. Thus, this study assessed the results of single-port laparoscopic stoma creation for fecal diversion, specifically focusing on feasibility, safety, and efficacy.
Methods
Patients who underwent single-incision enterostomy performed by a single surgeon were included. Data on demographics, indications for and chosen procedure, and operation results were retrospectively collected and analyzed.
Results
Between April 2015 and January 2018, a total of 13 patients (8 males, 5 females) with a mean age of 57.7 years (range, 41–83 years) underwent single-port ileostomy creation. The most common reason for diversion was palliative ileostomy for colon obstruction or fistula from peritoneal malignancy (n = 12), followed by colonic fistula with necrotizing pancreatitis (n = 1). There were no cases of conversion to open or multiport laparoscopic surgery. The mean operative time was 54 minutes (range, 37–118 minutes), and the median length of hospital stay was 8 days (range, 2–211 days). A postoperative complication, aspiration pneumonia, was documented in 1 patient and treated conservatively. The mean duration of bowel movement was 0.7 days (range, 0–4 days). All stomas had good function, and there was no 30-day mortality.
Conclusion
Single-port laparoscopic ileostomy in patients with a palliative setting could be a safe and feasible option for fecal diversion.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison between liquid skin adhesive and wound closure strip for skin closure after subcuticular suturing in single-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a single-center retrospective study in Korea
    Kyeong Eui Kim, Yu Ra Jeon, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2024; 27(1): 14.     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP