Purpose Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) failure in fecal incontinence (FI) management represents a therapeutic challenge, often leading to more invasive, less accepted alternatives with inconsistent efficacy. In this context, intramural rectal botulinum toxin A (BoNT-A) injection has recently emerged as a promising minimally invasive alternative for urge FI. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of intramural rectal BoNT-A injections in the challenging subgroup of SNM nonresponders.
Methods This retrospective, single-center study included patients with urge FI who underwent intramural rectal BoNT-A injections after SNM failure, between February 2018 and September 2024. The procedure involved endoscopic injection of 200 units of BoNT-A at 10 circumferential sites in the rectal wall. Treatment efficacy was assessed using the Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence Score (CCFIS) and a visual analog scale (VAS) for symptom severity.
Results Fifteen female patients met the inclusion criteria, with a median follow-up of 22.5 months (range, 4.4–103.2 months). Patients received a median of 2 injections, with a median reinjection interval of 9.8 months. CCFIS scores demonstrated significant improvement (median, 15 [range, 8–20] vs. 8 [range, 0–20]; P=0.001), as did VAS symptom scores (median, 4 [range, 0–5] vs. 2 [range, 0–5]; P=0.001). No adverse events were reported.
Conclusion This study provides long-term evidence supporting intramural rectal BoNT-A injections as an effective option for managing urge FI, including as salvage therapy in SNM nonresponders. Further studies are necessary to confirm these findings and define the optimal role of BoNT-A within the therapeutic algorithm for urge FI.
Fecal incontinence (FI) significantly impairs patient quality of life and creates substantial distress not only for affected individuals but also for nurses and caregivers. The prevalence of FI among older adults is estimated at up to 20%, although the sensitive nature of the condition often prevents active reporting by patients. This article reviews risk factors and pharmacotherapies for FI, emphasizing the therapeutic potential of Daikenchuto (DKT). The etiology of FI is multifactorial and lacks a singular definition. Currently, no prescription drugs specifically approved for FI are available, leaving treatment options limited. Nonetheless, major clinical guidelines have identified several viable pharmacological approaches. Strongly recommended treatments include the antidiarrheal agent loperamide and stool bulking or solidifying agents, such as dietary fiber and polycarbophil. Other therapeutic options include ramosetron, a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist; amitriptyline, a tricyclic antidepressant; and sodium valproate and diazepam, which are GABAergic neuromodulators. Recently, research has explored the efficacy and mechanism of action of DKT, a traditional Japanese medicine Kampo. Historically used for abdominal symptoms like bloating and known for promoting intestinal motility, emerging evidence suggests DKT may also effectively manage FI.
Purpose This study assessed the long-term outcomes and quality of life in patients who underwent sacral neuromodulation (SNM) due to low anterior resection syndrome (LARS).
Methods This single-center retrospective study, conducted from 2005 to 2021, included 30 patients (21 men; median age, 70 years) who had undergone total mesorectal excision with stoma closure and had no recurrence at inclusion. All patients were diagnosed with LARS refractory to conservative treatment. We evaluated clinical and quality-of-life outcomes after SNM through a stool diary, Wexner score, LARS score, the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (FIQL) questionnaire, and EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) questionnaire.
Results Peripheral nerve stimulation was successful in all but one patient. Of the 29 patients who underwent percutaneous nerve evaluation, 17 (58.62%) responded well to SNM and received permanent implants. The median follow-up period was 48 months (range, 18–153 months). The number of days per week with fecal incontinence episodes decreased from a median of 7 (range, 2–7) to 0.38 (range, 0–1). The median number of bowel movements recorded in patient diaries fell from 5 (range, 4–12) to 2 (range, 1–6). The median Wexner score decreased from 18 (range, 13–20) to 6 (range, 0–16), while the LARS score declined from 38.5 (range, 37–42) to 19 (range, 4–28). The FIQL and EQ-5D questionnaires demonstrated enhanced quality of life.
Conclusion SNM may benefit patients diagnosed with LARS following rectal cancer surgery when conservative options have failed, and the treatment outcomes may possess long-term sustainability.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS): A Contemporary Surgical Review of Incidence, Pathophysiology, Risk Stratification and Functional Outcomes Supreet Kumar, Vivek Tandon, Deepak Govil Apollo Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Fecal incontinence (FI) has a significant long-term impact on patient quality of life for which there is a range of medical and surgical management alternatives. We report the preliminary outcome using the ForConti Contix Faecal Incontinence Management System (FIMS) in FI patients who had failed conservative therapy and who were recruited at 2 tertiary institutions between September 2018 and September 2020. Comparative assessments were made before and after 2 week periods of treatment using bowel diaries and subjective Wexner and Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life scores. Of 17 patients enrolled, 11 completed an 8-week assessment with a significant fall in the average percentage of FI days reported from 84% before treatment to 16.8% at the first posttreatment assessment and down to 13.2% by the second assessment period. This finding correlated with a similar reduction in the total weekly number of episodes of frank FI, minor soiling, and fecal urgency reported by patients along with concomitant improvements in the Wexner scores. For those using the device, there was less concern about accidental bowel leakage, high rates of satisfaction, and minimal problems with the device. Initial results are encouraging warranting further study.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Novel Nonablative Radiofrequency Approach for the Treatment of Anal Incontinence: A Phase 1 Clinical Trial Patrícia Lordêlo, Juliana Barros, Claudia Liony, Cristiane Maria Carvalho C Dias, Janine Ferreira, Priscila G Januário, Luana N Matos, Camila O Muniz, Laizza S Silva, Cristina Brasil Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Juvenile polyps (JPs) are the most common polyps in pediatric patients. We present the case of an 18-year-old male patient with a giant solitary JP resembling solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS). The presenting history was rectal bleeding and symptoms of obstructed defecation syndrome. Colonoscopy revealed a polypoidal mass at the anorectal junction, with biopsy-confirmed SRUS. The symptoms worsened, and a protruding mass from the anus caused fecal incontinence. Pelvic magnetic resonance imaging showed a huge pedunculated mass occupying the low rectum with local compression of the urinary bladder. Transanal excision of the anal tumor was performed due to bleeding. A histopathological examination showed a JP with high-grade dysplasia. A histological examination to differentiate JPs and SRUS could be challenging based on a superficial forceps biopsy. Therefore, an excision biopsy is usually warranted with the understanding that adenomatous or malignant transformation is found in 5.6% to 12% of all JPs.
Purpose Complex anal fistulas can recur after clinical healing, even after a long interval which leads to significant anxiety. Also, ascertaining the efficacy of any new treatment procedure becomes difficult and takes several years. We prospectively analyzed the validity of Garg scoring system (GSS) to predict long-term fistula healing.
Methods In patients operated for cryptoglandular anal fistulas, magnetic resonance imaging was performed preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively to assess fistula healing. Scores as per the GSS were calculated for each patient at 3 months postoperatively and correlated with long-term healing to check the accuracy of the scoring system.
Results Fifty-seven patients were enrolled, but 50 were finally included (7 were excluded). These 50 patients (age, 41.2±12.4 years; 46 men) were followed up for 12 to 20 months (median, 17 months). Forty-seven patients (94.0%) had complex fistulas, 28 (56.0%) had recurrent fistulas, 48 (96.0%) had multiple tracts, 20 (40.0%) had horseshoe tracts, 15 (32.0%) had associated abscesses, 5 (10.0%) were suprasphincteric, and 8 (16.0%) were supralevator fistulas. The GSS could accurately predict long-term healing (high positive predictive value, 31 of 31 [100%]) but was not very accurate in predicting nonhealing (negative predictive value, 15 of 19 [78.9%]). The sensitivity in predicting healing was 31 of 35 (88.6%).
Conclusion GSS accurately predicts long-term fistula with a high positive predictive value (100%) but is less accurate in predicting nonhealing. This scoring system can help allay anxiety in patients and facilitate the early validation of innovative procedures for anal fistulas.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
External validation of the modified Parks classification of cryptoglandular anal fistula to predict failure of healing: the protocol for a retrospective analysis Alireza Teymouri, Amir Keshvari, Faezeh Khorasanizadeh, Alireza Kazemeini, Behnam Behboudi, Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli, Mohammad Reza Keramati, Ali Ashjaei, Seyed Mohsen Ahmadi Tafti, Amirhosein Naseri International Journal of Surgery Protocols.2025; 29(3): 118. CrossRef
Recent Advances in the Understanding and Management of Anal Fistula from India Vipul D. Yagnik, Sandeep Kumar, Anshul Thakur, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Sushil Dawka, Pankaj Garg Indian Journal of Surgery.2024; 86(6): 1105. CrossRef
Rectovaginal Fistulas Not Involving the Rectovaginal Septum Should Be Treated Like Anal Fistulas: A New Concept and Proposal for a Reclassification of Rectovaginal Fistulas Pankaj Garg, Laxmikant Ladukar, Vipul Yagnik, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Gurleen Kaur Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology.2024; Volume 17: 97. CrossRef
Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of complex anal fistula Pankaj Garg, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Vipul D. Yagnik, G. Mahak Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 321. CrossRef
Predictors of outcome in cryptoglandular anal fistula according to magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review Alireza Teymouri, Amir Keshvari, Ali Ashjaei, Seyed Mohsen Ahmadi Tafti, Faeze Salahshour, Faezeh Khorasanizadeh, Amirhosein Naseri Health Science Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Pankaj Garg: A Community Doctor to a Master Innovator to a Global Icon David N. Armstrong, Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska, Vincent de Parades, Francesco Litta, Manuel Limbert, Khaw C. W. James Global Journal of Medical, Pharmaceutical, and Biomedical Update.2023; 18: 16. CrossRef
The complexity in the molecular mechanism of the internal anal sphincter (IAS) limits preclinical or clinical outcomes of fecal incontinence (FI) treatment. So far, there are no systematic reviews of IAS translation and experimental studies that have been reported. This systematic review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of IAS critical role in FI. Previous studies revealed the key pathway for basal tone and relaxation of IAS in different properties as follows; calcium, Rho-associated, coiled-coil containing serine/threonine kinase, aging-associated IAS dysfunction, oxidative stress, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone, cyclooxygenase, and inhibitory neurotransmitters. Previous studies have reported improved functional outcomes of cellular treatment for regeneration of dysfunctional IAS, using various stem cells, but did not demonstrate the interrelationship between those results and basal tone or relaxation-related molecular pathway of IAS. Furthermore, these results have lower specificity for IAS-incontinence due to the included external anal sphincter or nerve injury regardless of the cell type. An acellular approach using bioengineered IAS showed a physiologic response of basal tone and relaxation response similar to human IAS. However, in both cellular and acellular approaches, the lack of human IAS data still hampers clinical application. Therefore, the IAS regeneration presents more challenges and warrants more advances.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A single-center retrospective analysis of endorectal advancement flaps used for the treatment of simple rectovaginal fistulas Xuexiao Li, Wanjin Shao, Guidong Sun Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2025; 60(4): 307. CrossRef
Anal sphincter reconstruction for fecal incontinence: Techniques, outcomes, and future directions Hai-Liang Li, Hao-Ran Zhang, Yuan Wu, Kai-Qiang He, Tian-Jie Chen, Jing Wang World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches in colorectal surgery Bigyan B. Mainali, James J. Yoo, Mitchell R. Ladd Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 336. CrossRef
3D spheroids versus 2D-cultured human adipose stem cells to generate smooth muscle cells in an internal anal sphincter-targeting cryoinjured mouse model Iltae Son, Minsung Kim, Ji-Seon Lee, Dogeon Yoon, You-Rin Kim, Ji Hye Park, Bo-Young Oh, Wook Chun, Sung-Bum Kang Stem Cell Research & Therapy.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Differentiation of Adipose-Derived Stem Cells into Smooth Muscle Cells in an Internal Anal Sphincter-Targeting Anal Incontinence Rat Model Minsung Kim, Bo-Young Oh, Ji-Seon Lee, Dogeon Yoon, You-Rin Kim, Wook Chun, Jong Wan Kim, Il Tae Son Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(4): 1632. CrossRef
Improving Efficiency and Accuracy in English Translation Learning: Investigating a Semantic Analysis Correction Algorithm Lingmei Cao, Junru Fu Applied Artificial Intelligence.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose Anastomotic leak (AL) is an uncommon but potentially devastating complication after rectal resection. We aim to provide an updated assessment of bowel function and quality of life after AL, as well as associated short- and long-term outcomes.
Methods A retrospective audit of all rectal resections performed at a colorectal unit and associated private hospitals over the past 10 years was performed. Relevant demographic, operative, and histopathological data were collected. A prospective survey was performed regarding patients’ quality of life and fecal continence. These patients were matched with nonAL patients who completed the same survey.
Results One hundred patients (out of 1,394 resections) were included. AL was contained in 66.0%, not contained in 10.0%, and only anastomotic stricture in 24.0%. Management was antibiotics only in 39.0%, percutaneous drainage in 9.0%, operative abdominal drainage in 19.0%, transrectal drainage in 6.0%, combination of percutaneous drainage and transrectal drainage in 2.0%, and combination abdominal/transrectal drainage in 1.0%. The 1-year stoma rate was 15.0%. Overall, mean Fecal Incontinence Severity Instrument scores were higher for AL patients than their matched counterparts (8.06±10.5 vs. 2.92±4.92, P=0.002). Patients with an AL had a mean EuroQol visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) of 76.23±19.85; this was lower than the matched mean EQ-VAS for non-AL patients of 81.64±18.07, although not statistically significant (P=0.180).
Conclusion The majority of AL patients in this study were managed with antibiotics only. AL was associated with higher fecal incontinence scores in the long-term; however, this did not equate to lower quality of life scores.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Impact of timing of ileostomy reversal and anastomotic leakage on bowel function and health-related quality of life following rectal cancer surgery: a cross-sectional study Ditte Reitz Petersen, Pia Møller Faaborg, Issam Al-Najami, Maja Mi Thygesen, Anna Pilegaard Bjarnesen Mølstrøm, Sören Möller, Mark Bremholm Ellebæk Surgical Endoscopy.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Cancer Surgery on Quality of Life: A Systematic Review Anke H.C. Gielen, Danique J.I. Heuvelings, Patricia Sylla, Yu-Ting van Loon, Jarno Melenhorst, Nicole D. Bouvy, Merel L. Kimman, Stephanie O. Breukink Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2025; 68(2): 154. CrossRef
Fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green for low anterior resection in patients with rectal cancer: a prospective before and after study J. Charbonneau, É. Papillon-Dion, R. Brière, N. Singbo, A. Legault-Dupuis, S. Drolet, F. Rouleau-Fournier, P. Bouchard, A. Bouchard, C. Thibault, F. Letarte Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Circular staplers and anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: meta-analysis Claudio Fiorillo, Vincenzo Tondolo, Beatrice Biffoni, Elisabetta Gambaro, Chiara Lucinato, Davide De Sio, Sergio Alfieri, Giuseppe Quero BJS Open.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Intraoperative fluorescence angiography with indocyanine green to prevent anastomotic leak in rectal cancer surgery (IntAct): an unblinded randomised controlled trial David Jayne, Julie Croft, Neil Corrigan, Philip Quirke, Ronan A Cahill, Gemma Ainsworth, David M Meads, Andrew Kirby, Damian Tolan, Katie Gordon, Roel Hompes, Antonino Spinelli, Caterina Foppa, Albert M Wolthuis, André D'Hoore, Andrea Vignali, Henry S Til The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2025; 10(9): 806. CrossRef
Impact of anastomotic leakage and radiotherapy on long-term quality of life after sphincter-saving rectal resections Rasim Khalilov, Steffen Seyfried, Christoph Reissfelder, Julia Hardt, Florian Herrle, Vugar Yagublu Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Risk factors and risk prediction modelling for pelvic sepsis and anastomotic leak following robotic total mesorectal excision with primary anastomosis for rectal cancer C. A. Fleming, R. T. J. Geitenbeek, R. Duhoky, A. Moussion, N. Bouazza, J. Khan, E. Cotte, A. Dubois, E. Rullier, R. Hompes, P. Rouanet, E. C. J. Consten, Q. Denost Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Association between anastomotic leak after rectal resection and bowel dysfunction, a systematic review, meta‐analysis and meta‐regression Sameh Hany Emile, Roberta Lynn Oslin, Anjelli Wignakumar, Nir Horesh, Zoe Garoufalia, Steven D. Wexner, Marylise Boutros Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Does robotic circumferential oversewing reduce anastomotic leakage in stapled anastomosis for rectal cancer surgery? J.-M. Jung, S. Yang, Y. S. Yoon, Y. I. Kim, M. H. Kim, J. L. Lee, C. W. Kim, I. J. Park, S.-B. Lim, C. S. Yu Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Without Radiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Surgical Outcomes After Total Mesorectal Excision Richard Garfinkle, Saba Balvardi, Marylise Boutros, Dean A. Fergusson Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2025; 68(12): 1383. CrossRef
Management of anastomotic leak after elective anterior resection for rectal cancer: A systematic review and pooled analysis Ruth Walsh, Edward Murphy, Éanna J. Ryan, Ronan A. Cahill Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The Effect of Post‐Treatment Combined Lifestyle Interventions on Quality of Life in Colorectal Cancer Patients – A Systematic Review Anke H. C. Gielen, Britt J. M. Thomassen, Tim J. Bult, Jarno Melenhorst, Merel L. Kimman, Stephanie O. Breukink Lifestyle Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Serum nutritional predictive biomarkers and risk assessment for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer patients Paerhati Shayimu, Maitisaidi Awula, Chang-Yong Wang, Rexida Jiapaer, Yi-Peng Pan, Zhi-Min Wu, Yi Chen, Ze-Liang Zhao World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(10): 3142. CrossRef
Early detection of anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery: the role of early warning score and C-reactive protein Gyung Mo Son Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 415. CrossRef
Optimal Indocyanine Green Dosage for Repetitive Angiography for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery Gyung Mo Son, Sang-Ho Park, Nam Su Kim, Mi Sook Yun, In Young Lee, Myeong-Sook Kwon, Tae Kyun Kim, Eun Hwa Lee, Eun Jung Hwang, Kwang-Ryul Baek Medicina.2024; 60(12): 1966. CrossRef
Beyond survival: a comprehensive review of quality of life in rectal cancer patients Won Beom Jung Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 527. CrossRef
Purpose Bowel dysfunction commonly occurs in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with a multimodal approach of chemoradiation therapy (CRT) combined with sphincter-preserving rectal resection. This study investigated the decline in anorectal function using sequential anorectal manometric measurements obtained before and after the multimodal treatment as well as at a 1-year follow-up.
Methods This was a retrospective cohort study conducted in a single center. The study population consisted of patients with locally advanced mid- to low rectal cancer who received the preoperative CRT followed by sphincter-preserving surgery from 2012 to 2016. The anorectal manometric value measured after each treatment modality was compared to demonstrate the degree of decline in anorectal function. A generalized linear model of repeated measures was performed using the manometric values measured pre- and post-CRT, and at 12 months postoperatively.
Results Overall, 100 patients with 3 consecutive manometric data were included in the final analysis. In the overall cohort study, the mean resting and maximal squeezing pressures showed insignificant decrement post-neoadjuvant CRT. At a 1-year postoperative follow-up, the maximal squeezing pressure significantly decreased. The maximal rectal sensory threshold demonstrated significant reduction consecutively after each following treatment (P<0.001).
Conclusion The short-term effect of neoadjuvant CRT on the anal sphincters was relatively trivial. The following sphincter-saving surgery resulted in a profound disruption of the anorectal function. Patients with rectal cancer should be consulted on the consequence of multimodal treatment.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Beyond survival: a comprehensive review of quality of life in rectal cancer patients Won Beom Jung Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 527. CrossRef
Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341. CrossRef
Purpose Perianal injection of bulking agents is an attractive treatment option for patients with mild to moderate fecal incontinence (FI). Various bulking agents have been used for injection therapy, but the optimal injection materials and methods are yet to be standardized. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of injection therapy using aluminum potassium sulfate and tannic acid (ALTA) in the management of FI.
Methods This study included consecutive patients who underwent ALTA injection therapy for FI at our institution. The procedure was performed with the patient in the jackknife position, under caudal epidural anesthesia. The procedure consisted of a 4-step injection to the 3 main cushions and a multipoint injection to the remaining submucosa of the anal canal.
Results Seventy-seven patients (mean age, 76 years) were enrolled in the study. The mean Cleveland Clinic incontinence score of 11.9 ± 4.1 at baseline significantly improved to 7.3 ± 5.2 at 3 months following treatment. The mean maximal resting pressure also increased significantly 3 months after the intervention. Postoperative complications were observed in 3 patients (3.9%), and all events were mild. The mean duration of postoperative follow-up was 17.5 months. The cumulative recurrence-free rate at 3 years was 72.4%.
Conclusion ALTA injection for FI is safe, easy to perform, and provides reasonable mid-term outcomes. Moreover, concomitant anorectal diseases that may be contraindicated by other injectable bulking agents could be treated simultaneously. Therefore, ALTA injection is a promising alternative in the absence of other injectable agents.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Effective non-surgical treatment of hemorrhoids with sclerosing foam and novel injection device Juan Cabrera Garrido, Gonzalo López González Gastroenterology & Endoscopy.2024; 2(4): 176. CrossRef
Tissue engineering and regenerative medicine approaches in colorectal surgery Bigyan B. Mainali, James J. Yoo, Mitchell R. Ladd Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 336. CrossRef
Efficacy and Safety of a New Technique Combining Injection Sclerotherapy and External Hemorrhoidectomy for Prolapsed Hemorrhoids: A Single-center Observational Study Tatsuya Abe, Masao Kunimoto, Yoshikazu Hachiro, Akane Ito, Kenji Watanabe, Shigenori Ota, Kei Ohara, Mitsuhiro Inagaki, Yusuke Saitoh, Masanori Murakami Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2024; 8(4): 331. CrossRef
Simple Anal Reinforcement with Anal Encirclement Using an Artificial Ligament in Patients with fecal Incontinence: A Single-center Observational Study Tatsuya Abe, Masao Kunimoto, Yoshikazu Hachiro, Shigenori Ota, Kei Ohara, Mitsuhiro Inagaki Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(3): 174. CrossRef
Purpose Anal fissure is a common anorectal condition, yet its pathogenesis remains unclear. Lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) is the gold standard treatment for chronic anal fissures that do not respond to conservative treatment; however, it has a risk of anal incontinence. We believe that fibrosis of the internal anal sphincter is an important factor in the pathogenesis of chronic anal fissure. In this study, we describe the minimal LIS method, a minimally invasive method where only the fibrotic portion of the internal anal sphincter is cut. We also describe the outcomes of this method.
Methods We performed a retrospective review of 468 patients (270 male and 198 female) who underwent minimal LIS for chronic anal fissure in 2017 at Seoul Song Do Hospital. We analyzed the patients’ clinical characteristics, manometry data, complications, and outcomes of minimal LIS. The outcomes of the surgery were assessed via questionnaires during the postoperative outpatient visits, beginning 2 weeks postoperatively.
Results The overall complication rate was 4.0% (19 patients). Delayed healing occurred in 14 patients (3.0%), perianal abscess was present in 3 patients (0.6%), and gas incontinence occurred in 2 patients (0.4%). All complications were improved with conservative treatment. Recurrence, defined as the recurrence of anal fissure more than 4 weeks after healing, was present in 6 patients (1.3%).
Conclusion Minimal LIS is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with chronic anal fissure. Postoperative complications, especially incontinence and recurrence, are rare.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Operative Therapie der Analfissur Ricarda Diller coloproctology.2025; 47(4): 254. CrossRef
Current evidence and new trends in anal fissure treatment Marta DOMÍNGUEZ-MUÑOZ, Andrea BALLA, Juan Carlos GÓMEZ-ROSADO, Salvador MORALES-CONDE Minerva Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The Practices and Preferences of Turkish Surgeons in the Treatment of Anal Fissure Ümit Özdemir, Necip Tolga Baran, Ahmet Seki Journal of Coloproctology.2025; 45(03): 001. CrossRef
Management of Hemorrhoids and Anal Fissures Oladapo Akinmoladun, William Oh Surgical Clinics of North America.2024; 104(3): 473. CrossRef
Anal Fissure and Its Treatments: A Historical Review Cristiana Riboni, Lucio Selvaggi, Francesco Cantarella, Mauro Podda, Salvatore Bracchitta, Vinicio Mosca, Angelo Cosenza, Vincenzo Cosenza, Francesco Selvaggi, Bruno Nardo, Francesco Pata Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(13): 3930. CrossRef
Botulinum toxin injection versus lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissure: a meta-analysis of randomized control trials Ali Bonyad, Reza Hossein Zadeh, Setareh Asgari, Fatemeh Eghbal, Pardis Hajhosseini, Hani Ghadri, Niloofar Deravi, Reza Shah Hosseini, Mahdyieh Naziri, Rasoul Hossein Zadeh, Yaser khakpour, Sina Seyedipour Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Modern trends and priority in treatment of chronic anal fissure S. A. Aliev, E. S. Aliev Grekov's Bulletin of Surgery.2024; 183(4): 77. CrossRef
New Findings at the Internal Anal Sphincter on Cadaveric Dissection and Review of Sphincter-Related Surgery in a Newer Prospective Aswini Kumar Pujahari Indian Journal of Surgery.2023; 85(3): 585. CrossRef
Long-term Efficacy and Safety of Controlled Manual Anal Dilatation in the Treatment of Chronic Anal Fissures: A Single-center Observational Study Tatsuya Abe, Masao Kunimoto, Yoshikazu Hachiro, Shigenori Ota, Kei Ohara, Mitsuhiro Inagaki, Yusuke Saitoh, Masanori Murakami Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2023; 7(4): 250. CrossRef
The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland guideline on the management of anal fissure Katie L. R. Cross, Steven R. Brown, Jos Kleijnen, James Bunce, Melanie Paul, Sophie Pilkington, Oliver Warren, Oliver Jones, Jon Lund, Henry J. Goss, Michael Stanton, Tatenda Marunda, Artaza Gilani, L. Wee Sing Ngu, Philip Tozer Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(12): 2423. CrossRef
Is It a Refractory Disease?- Fecal Incontinence; beyond
Medication Chungyeop Lee, Jong Lyul Lee The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Vicente Pla-Martí, Jose Martín-Arévalo, Rosa Martí-Fernández, David Moro-Valdezate, Stephanie García-Botello, Alejandro Espí-Macías, Miguel Mínguez-Pérez, Maria Dolores Ruiz-Carmona, Jose Vicente Roig-Vila
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(1):13-19. Published online September 18, 2020
Purpose This study was performed to evaluate the long-term evolution of continence and patient’s quality of life after surgical treatment for obstetric fecal incontinence.
Methods A prospective longitudinal study was conducted including consecutive patients who underwent sphincteroplasty for severe obstetric fecal incontinence. The first phase analyzed changes in continence and impact on quality of life. The second phase studied the long-term evolution reevaluating the same group of patients 6 years later. Degree of fecal incontinence was calculated using the Cleveland Clinic Score (CCS). Quality of life assessment was carried out with the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale.
Results Thirty-five patients with median age of 55 years (range, 28 to 73 years) completed the study. Phase 1 results: after a postoperative follow-up of 30 months (4 to 132 months), CCS had improved significantly from a preoperative of 15.7 ± 3.1 to 6.1 ± 5.0 (P < 0.001). Phase 2 results: median follow-up in phase 2 was 110 months (76 to 204 months). The CCS lowered to 8.4 ± 4.9 (P = 0.04). There were no significant differences between phases 1 and 2 in terms of quality of life; lifestyle (3.47 ± 0.75 vs. 3.16 ±1.04), coping/behavior (3.13 ±0.83 vs. 2.80 ±1.09), depression/self-perception (3.65 ±0.80 vs. 3.32 ± 0.98), and embarrassment (3.32 ± 0.90 vs. 3.12 ± 1.00).
Conclusion Sphincteroplasty offers good short-medium term outcomes in continence and quality of life for obstetric fecal incontinence treatment. Functional clinical results deteriorate over time but did not impact on patients’ quality of life.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and secondary overlapping sphincteroplasty from a colorectal perspective: A Systematic Review Abdel Latif Khalifa Elnaim, Michael P.K. Wong, Ismail Sagap Academic Medicine & Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparative outcomes of sphincteroplasty and sacral neuromodulation in postmenopausal women with late-onset fecal incontinence following obstetric trauma: a retrospective study Alessandro Bergna, Andrea Rusconi, Jacques Megevand, Ettore Lillo, Massimo Amboldi, Alessio Lanzaro, Leonardo Lenisa, Ezio Ganio Updates in Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: A Urogynecologic Perspective on Detection and Diagnosis Katarzyna Borycka, Diaa E. E. Rizk International Urogynecology Journal.2025; 36(11): 2187. CrossRef
Anal sphincter reconstruction for fecal incontinence: Techniques, outcomes, and future directions Hai-Liang Li, Hao-Ran Zhang, Yuan Wu, Kai-Qiang He, Tian-Jie Chen, Jing Wang World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty: Postoperative Outcomes and Predictive Factors for Pain, Bleeding, and Recovery Laurențiu Augustus Barbu, Nicolae-Dragoș Mărgăritescu, Liliana Cercelaru, Tiberiu Stefăniță Țenea Cojan, Mădălina Costinela Stănică, Irina Enăchescu, Ana-Maria Țenea Cojan, Valentina Căluianu, Gabriel Florin Răzvan Mogoș, Liviu Vasile Life.2025; 15(11): 1777. CrossRef
Efficacy of Sacral Neuromodulation in Treatment of Fecal Incontinence Associated With Anal Sphincter Defects: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis Sameh Hany Emile, Anjelli Wignakumar, Nir Horesh, Zoe Garoufalia, Marcus Oosenbrug, Victor Strassmann, Steven D. Wexner World Journal of Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Baiona’s Consensus Statement for Fecal Incontinence. Spanish Association of Coloproctology Javier Cerdán Miguel, Antonio Arroyo Sebastián, Antonio Codina Cazador, Fernando de la Portilla de Juan, Mario de Miguel Velasco, Alberto de San Ildefonso Pereira, Fernando Jiménez Escovar, Franco Marinello, Mónica Millán Scheiding, Arantxa Muñoz Duyos, M Cirugía Española (English Edition).2024; 102(3): 158. CrossRef
Diagnostic tools for fecal incontinence: Scoring systems are the crucial first step Peter Liptak, Martin Duricek, Peter Banovcin World Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 30(6): 516. CrossRef
Consenso Baiona sobre Incontinencia Fecal: Asociación Española de Coloproctología Javier Cerdán Miguel, Antonio Arroyo Sebastián, Antonio Codina Cazador, Fernando de la Portilla de Juan, Mario de Miguel Velasco, Alberto de San Ildefonso Pereira, Fernando Jiménez Escovar, Franco Marinello, Mónica Millán Scheiding, Arantxa Muñoz Duyos, M Cirugía Española.2024; 102(3): 158. CrossRef
How to Avoid Becoming a Risk Factor of Fecal Incontinence Due to OASIS—A Narrative Review Nikodem Horst Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(17): 5071. CrossRef
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Fecal Incontinence Liliana G. Bordeianou, Amy J. Thorsen, Deborah S. Keller, Alexander T. Hawkins, Craig Messick, Lucia Oliveira, Daniel L. Feingold, Amy L. Lightner, Ian M. Paquette Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2023; 66(5): 647. CrossRef
Validation of the Turkish version of the Quality of Life in Patients with Anal Fistula Questionnaire Mehmet Ali Koç, Kerem Özgü, Derya Gökmen, Mehmet Süha Sevinç, Şiyar Ersöz, Cihangir Akyol Turkish Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023; 33(4): 124. CrossRef
A systematic review of translation and experimental studies on internal anal sphincter for fecal incontinence Minsung Kim, Bo-Young Oh, Ji-Seon Lee, Dogeon Yoon, Wook Chun, Il Tae Son Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(3): 183. CrossRef
Is It a Refractory Disease?- Fecal Incontinence; beyond
Medication Chungyeop Lee, Jong Lyul Lee The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose Propiverine hydrochloride (PH) is widely used for the treatment of urinary incontinence (UI) due to bladder overactivity. Moreover, the comorbidity of UI with fecal incontinence (FI) is known to be due to the relationship of both to nervous system disorders and dysfunction or weakening of the pelvic floor muscles. The aim of this single-arm prospective study was to evaluate the therapeutic value of PH for FI.Methods: Patients (n = 24) who were diagnosed as having both FI and UI from April 2015 to November 2016 were included in the study and administered a dosage of 10–20 mg PH every day for 1 month. The primary endpoint was to create a reduction in the frequency of FI per week. An evaluation criterion of ≥50% reduction in frequency was determined as effective. The percentage of the patients who achieved the ≥50% endpoint (responders) was also calculated.Results: The frequency of FI per week was 6.0 ± 8.2 (0.25–30) at baseline and reduced to 1.6 ± 2.1 (0–7) at the posttherapeutic state (P = 0.005). A reduction of ≥50% was seen in 14 of the patients (58.3%).Conclusion: PH reduced the frequency of FI in patients with both FI and UI. This study introduces a possible therapeutic option for the pharmacological treatment of FI.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The Japan Society of Coloproctology Practice Guidelines for Fecal Incontinence 2024 (Revised Second Edition) Keiji Koda, Toshiki Mimura, Tetsuo Yamana, Mitsuru Ishizuka, Tomoko Takahashi, Shota Takano, Tatsuya Abe, Yuji Nishizawa, Hidetoshi Katsuno, Masami Sato, Kaoru Nishimura, Masahiro Yoshida, Kotaro Maeda Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2026; 10(1): 64. CrossRef
A systematic review of translation and experimental studies on internal anal sphincter for fecal incontinence Minsung Kim, Bo-Young Oh, Ji-Seon Lee, Dogeon Yoon, Wook Chun, Il Tae Son Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(3): 183. CrossRef
Is It a Refractory Disease?- Fecal Incontinence; beyond
Medication Chungyeop Lee, Jong Lyul Lee The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Despite significant advancements in the field of medicine, management of complex obstetric perineal injuries remains a challenge. Although several surgical techniques have been described, no techniques have provided satisfactory long-term results. Recently, a perineal transposed antropyloric valve has been used for anorectal reconstruction in patients with damaged or excised anal sphincters. We describe this technique in the case of complex obstetric perineal trauma with extensive tissue loss, presenting with end stage fecal incontinence. The functional outcome after this procedure was evaluated. The patient tolerated the surgery well, and there were no procedure-related upper gastrointestinal disturbances. Short-term functional outcomes were encouraging. At the 36-month follow-up, the patient’s neoanal resting and squeeze pressures were 50 and 70 mmHg, respectively. The postoperative St. Mark’s incontinence score was 7. Perineal antropyloric valve transposition is feasible and can be successfully applied in the management of end-stage fecal incontinence associated with complex obstetric perineal injury.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Is It a Refractory Disease?- Fecal Incontinence; beyond
Medication Chungyeop Lee, Jong Lyul Lee The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose This study aims to establish the ability of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and anorectal manometry (ARM) in predicting the need for surgery in patients with fecal incontinence (FI).
Methods Between 2008 and 2015, PROMs data, including the Birmingham Bowel and Urinary Symptoms Questionnaire (BBUSQ), Short Form 36 (SF-36), Wexner Incontinence Score and ARM results, were prospectively collected from 276 patients presenting with FI. Spearman rank was used to assess correlations between specific PROMs questions and ARM assessments of sphincter motor function. Binomial regression analyses were performed to identify factors predictive of the need for surgery. Finally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to establish the utility of individual ARM and PROMs variables in predicting the need for surgical intervention in patients with FI.
Results Two hundred twenty-eight patients (82.60%) were treated conservatively while 48 (17.39%) underwent surgery. On univariate analyses, all 4 domains of the BBUSQ, all 8 domains of the SF-36, and the Wexner Incontinence Score were significant predictors of surgery. Additionally, maximum resting pressure, 5-second squeeze endurance, threshold volume, and urge volume were significant. On ROC curve analyses, the only significant ARM measurement was the 5-second squeeze endurance. PROMs, such as the incontinence domain of the BBUSQ and five of the SF-36 domains, were identified as fair discriminators of the need for surgery.
Conclusion PROMs are reliable predictors of maximal treatment in patients with FI and can be readily used in primary care to aid surgical referrals and can be applied in hospital settings as an aid to guide surgical treatment decisions.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Capturing Patient Reported Outcomes Following Treatment of Benign Anorectal Disease Requires Significant Surgeon Commitment: Do Surgeons Really Want to Know? Thomas Peponis, Marc S. Rubin, Ronald Bleday, Harrison T. Hubbell, Robert N. Goldstone, Joel E. Goldberg, Khawaja F. Ahmed, Liliana G. Bordeianou World Journal of Colorectal Surgery.2025; 14(1): 1. CrossRef
Clinical Grade of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries and Prediction of Mode of Birth Recommendations: A 20‐Year Retrospective Analysis Nicola Adanna Okeahialam, Ranee Thakar, Abdul H. Sultan BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.2025; 132(12): 1802. CrossRef
Correlation of Digital Rectal Examination and Anorectal Manometry with Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Women with Fecal Incontinence Alayne Markland, Mary Ackenbom, Uduak Andy, Ben Carper, Eric Jelovsek, Douglas Luchristt, Shawn Menefee, Rebecca Rogers, Vivian Sung, Donna Mazloomdoost, Maria Gantz International Urogynecology Journal.2024; 35(12): 2367. CrossRef
Pelvic floor investigations for anal incontinence: Are they useful to predict outcomes from conservative treatment? Karina Cuinas, Linda Ferrari, Carlene Igbedioh, Deepa Solanki, Andrew Williams, Alexis Schizas, Alison Hainsworth Neurourology and Urodynamics.2023; 42(5): 1122. CrossRef
Anorectal dysfunction in multiple sclerosis patients: A pilot study on the effect of an individualized rehabilitation approach Martina Kovari, Jan Stovicek, Jakub Novak, Michaela Havlickova, Sarka Mala, Andrew Busch, Pavel Kolar, Alena Kobesova NeuroRehabilitation.2022; 50(1): 89. CrossRef
Postpartum fecal incontinence. State of the problem D.R. Markaryan, A.M. Lukyanov, T.N. Garmanova, M.A. Agapov, V.A. Kubyshkin Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2022; (6): 127. CrossRef
Functional outcomes after sphincter-preserving surgeries for low-lying rectal cancer: A review Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik Precision and Future Medicine.2021; 5(4): 164. CrossRef
Usefulness of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Anorectal Physiologic Tests in Predicting Clinical Outcome for Fecal Incontinence Chang-Nam Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2019; 35(6): 289. CrossRef
Hyeonseok Jeong, Sung Hwan Hwang, Hyoung Rae Kim, Kil O Ryu, Jiyong Lim, Hye Mi Yu, Jihoon Yoon, Chee Young Kim, Kwang-Yong Jeong, Young Jae Jung, In Seob Jeong, Young Gil Choi
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(3):144-151. Published online June 30, 2019
Purpose The most common risk factor for fecal incontinence (FI) is obstetric injury. FI affects 1.4%–18% of adults. Most patients are unaware when they are young, when symptoms appear suddenly and worsen with aging. Autologous fat graft is widely used in cosmetic surgical field and may substitute for injectable bulky agents in treating FI. Authors have done fat graft for past several years. This article reports the effectiveness of the fat graft in treating FI and discusses satisfaction with the procedure.
Methods Fat was harvested from both lateral thighs using 10-mL Luer-loc syringe. Pure fat was extracted from harvests and mixed with fat, oil, and tumescent through refinement. Fats were injected into upper border of posterior ano-rectal ring, submucosa of anal canal and intersphincteric space. Thirty-five patients with FI were treated with this method from July 2016 to February 2017 in Busan Hangun Hospital. They were 13 male (mean age, 60.8 years) and 22 female patients (mean age, 63.3 years). The Wexner score was checked before procedure. We evaluated outcome in outpatients by asking the patients. For 19 patients we checked the Wexner score after procedure.
Results Symptom improved in 29 (82.9%), and not improved in 6 (17.1%). In 2 of 6 patients, they felt better than before procedure, although not satisfied. No improvement in 4. Mean Wexner score was 9.7 before procedure. There were no serious complications such as inflammation or fat embolism.
Conclusion Autologous fat graft can be an effective alternative treatment for FI. It is safe and easy to perform, and cost effective.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Regenerative Approach With Autologous Fat Grafting and Stem Cells for the Treatment of Post‐Traumatic Anal Incontinence: A Case Report Alexandre da Silva Nishimura, Giuliana Donoso Andrade Silva, Vitor Holmo Figueira, Eduardo Isaac Nishimoto, Pedro Luiz Nishimura Menardi, Igor Rincon Gonçalves Passaglia, Sabrina Thalita dos Reis Clinical Case Reports.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Cell-assisted lipotransfer in treating uncontrollable sepsis associated perianal fistula: a pilot study In Seob Jeong, Sung Hwan Hwang, Hye Mi Yu, Hyeonseok Jeong Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(2): 169. CrossRef
Efficacy of injection of autologous adipose tissue in the treatment of patients with complex and recurrent fistula-in-ano of cryptoglandular origin S. Guillaumes, N. J. Hidalgo, I. Bachero, R. Pena, S. T. Nogueira, J. Ardid, M. Pera Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Role of Autologous Fat Grafting in the Conservative Treatment of Fecal Incontinence in Children Valentina Pinto, Marco Pignatti, Giovanni Parente, Neil Di Salvo, Luca Contu, Mario Lima Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(4): 1258. CrossRef
Clinical and physiological efficacy of the application of autologous fat with platelet rich plasma in treating faecal incontinence Elvis Vargas Castillo, Ingrid Melo Amaral, Arisel Domínguez, Sthephfania López, Daniel Chiantera, Mariangela Pérez Paz, Jenils Daniela Coacuto, Andrés Eloy Soto Journal of Coloproctology.2020; 40(03): 227. CrossRef
Preliminary Study on the Echo-Assisted Intersphincteric Autologous Microfragmented Adipose Tissue Injection to Control Fecal Incontinence in Children Operated for Anorectal Malformations Giovanni Parente, Valentina Pinto, Neil Di Salvo, Simone D’Antonio, Michele Libri, Tommaso Gargano, Vincenzo Davide Catania, Giovanni Ruggeri, Mario Lima Children.2020; 7(10): 181. CrossRef
Permacol has been gaining popularity in recent times for the treatment of fecal incontinence (FI). This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anal submucosal Permacol injection in the treatment of FI.
Methods
All consecutive patients who underwent Permacol injection for FI over a 3-year period were included. Patients' data relating to obstetric history, anorectal/pelvic operations, type of FI, preoperative anorectal physiology results and follow-up details for outcome measures were collected. Preoperative and postoperative Cleveland Clinic Florida Incontinence Scores (CCFISs) were noted. Patients were surveyed by using a telephone questionnaire to assess the quality of life and other outcome measures. Data were analysed using SPSS ver.19.0.
Results
Thirty patients (28 females and 2 males) with a median age of 67 years were included in the study. Of those patients, 37%, 50%, and 13% were noted to have passive, mixed and urge FI, respectively. Six of the patients (20%) had repeat Permacol injections, 5 of whom had sustained responses to the first Permacol injection for a mean of 11 months. There was a significant improvement in the CCFIS from a baseline median of 12.5, mean 12.8 interquartile range [IQR], 6–20), to a median of 3.5, mean 4.8 (IQR, 0–20), P < 0.001. Of the patients surveyed by telephone 89% were satisfied with their overall experience and the improvement in their symptoms following Permacol injections.
Conclusion
This study has demonstrated that Permacol injection for the treatment of FI is safe and effective and has no associated major complications. However, the results are not permanent; consequently, a significant proportion of the patients with an initial response may require repeat injections.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Effectiveness of Autologous Fat Graft in Treating Fecal Incontinence Hyeonseok Jeong, Sung Hwan Hwang, Hyoung Rae Kim, Kil O Ryu, Jiyong Lim, Hye Mi Yu, Jihoon Yoon, Chee Young Kim, Kwang-Yong Jeong, Young Jae Jung, In Seob Jeong, Young Gil Choi Annals of Coloproctology.2019; 35(3): 144. CrossRef
Functional Outcome of Human Adipose Stem Cell Injections in Rat Anal Sphincter Acute Injury Model Kirsi Kuismanen, Miia Juntunen, Nathaniel Narra Girish, Heikki Tuominen, Heini Huhtala, Kari Nieminen, Jari Hyttinen, Susanna Miettinen Stem Cells Translational Medicine.2018; 7(3): 295. CrossRef
Sacral neuromodulation compared with injection of bulking agents for faecal incontinence following obstetric anal sphincter injury – a randomized controlled trial M. Rydningen, T. Dehli, T. Wilsgaard, A. Rydning, M. Kumle, R. O. Lindsetmo, S. Norderval Colorectal Disease.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Role of Permacol Injection in the Treatment of Patients With Fecal Incontinence Doo Han Lee Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(2): 49. CrossRef
This study prospectively investigated the effects of biofeedback therapy on objective anorectal function and subjective bowel function in patients after sphincter-saving surgery for rectal cancer.
Methods
Sixteen patients who underwent an ileostomy were randomized into two groups, one receiving conservative management with the Kegel maneuver and the other receiving active biofeedback before ileostomy closure. Among them, 12 patients (mean age, 57.5 years; range, 38 to 69 years; 6 patients in each group) completed the study. Conservative management included lifestyle modifications, Kegel exercises, and medication. Patients were evaluated at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after ileostomy closure by using anal manometry, modified Wexner Incontinence Scores (WISs), and fecal incontinence quality of life (FI-QoL) scores.
Results
Before the ileostomy closure, the groups did not differ in baseline clinical characteristics or resting manometric parameters. After 12 months of follow-up, the biofeedback group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the mean maximum squeezing pressure (from 146.3 to 178.9, P = 0.002). However, no beneficial effect on the WIS was noted for biofeedback compared to conservative management alone. Overall, the FI-QoL scores were increased significantly in both groups after ileostomy closure (P = 0.006), but did not differ significantly between the two groups.
Conclusion
Although the biofeedback therapy group demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the maximum squeezing pressure, significant improvements in the WISs and the FI-QoL scores over time were noted in both groups. The study was terminated early because no therapeutic benefit of biofeedback had been demonstrated.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training in the recovery of patients after low anterior resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis Min Jeong Kim, Seonmi Yeom, Young Man Kim European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2025; 77: 102918. CrossRef
BENEFÍCIOS DA FISIOTERAPIA EM PACIENTES COLOSTOMIZADOS E ILEOSTOMIZADOS: UMA REVISÃO NARRATIVA Ana Carolina Aboukalam da Cruz, Anderson Viana Pantoja, Leonardo Gomes de Souza, Maicon Maximiliano de Almeida, Marcus Vinicius Henriques Brito, George Alberto da Silva Dias REVISTA FOCO.2025; 18(7): e9137. CrossRef
The effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions on fecal incontinence and quality of life following colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Ming Yan Pun, Pak Ho Leung, Tsz Ching Chan, Chunn Pang, Kin Hei Chan, Priya Kannan Supportive Care in Cancer.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Application of pelvic floor rehabilitation in patients with colorectal cancer: a scoping review Lu Zhou, Changkun Zhong, Yuanyuan Su, Zhengyang Zhang, Ling Wang Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Patients Following Low Anterior Resection Young Man Kim, Eui Geum Oh Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing.2023; 50(2): 142. CrossRef
ILEOSTIM trial: a study protocol to evaluate the effectiveness of efferent loop stimulation before ileostomy reversal N. Blanco, I. Oliva, P. Tejedor, E. Pastor, A. Alvarellos, C. Pastor, J. Baixauli, J. Arredondo Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(12): 1251. CrossRef
Efficacy of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Postoperative Patients With Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Yuki Nakashima, Kenichi Fudeyasu, Yuki Kataoka, Shunsuke Taito, Takashi Ariie, Yukio Mikami Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
„Low anterior resection syndrome“ – Ursachen und therapeutische Ansätze Sigmar Stelzner, Juliane Kupsch, Sören Torge Mees Der Chirurg.2021; 92(7): 612. CrossRef
Anterior resection syndrome: a randomized clinical trial of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (ramosetron) in male patients with rectal cancer S -B Ryoo, J W Park, D W Lee, M A Lee, Y -H Kwon, M J Kim, S H Moon, S -Y Jeong, K J Park British Journal of Surgery.2021; 108(6): 644. CrossRef
Investigating Risk Factors for Complications after Ileostomy Reversal in Low Anterior Rectal Resection Patients: An Observational Study Mateusz Rubinkiewicz, Jan Witowski, Michał Wysocki, Magdalena Pisarska, Stanisław Kłęk, Andrzej Budzyński, Michał Pędziwiatr Journal of Clinical Medicine.2019; 8(10): 1567. CrossRef
Mind–Body Interventions for Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients in the Chinese Population: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Weidong Wang, Fang Wang, Feng Fan, Ana Cristina Sedas, Jian Wang International Journal of Behavioral Medicine.2017; 24(2): 191. CrossRef
Lentivirus‐mediated shRNA interference of ghrelin receptor blocks proliferation in the colorectal cancer cells An Liu, Chenggang Huang, Jia Xu, Xuehong Cai Cancer Medicine.2016; 5(9): 2417. CrossRef
Biofeedback Therapy After Sphincter-Preservation Surgery for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer Ik Yong Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(4): 119. CrossRef
After total mesorectal excision (TME) with primary anastomosis for patients with rectal cancer, the quality of life (QoL) may be decreased due to fecal incontinence. This study aimed to identify predictors of fecal incontinence and related QoL.
Methods
Patients who underwent TME with primary anastomosis for rectal cancer between December 2008 and June 2012 completed the fecal incontinence quality of life scale (FIQoL) and Wexner incontinence score. Factors associated with these scores were identified using a linear regression analysis.
Results
A total of 80 patients were included. Multivariate analysis identified a diverting ileostomy (n = 58) as an independent predictor of an unfavorable outcome on the FIQoL subscale coping/behavior (P = 0.041). Ileostomy closure within and after 3 months resulted in median Wexner scores of 5.0 (interquartile range [IQR], 2.5-8.0) and 10.5 (IQR, 6.0-13.8), respectively (P < 0.001). The median FIQoL score was 15.0 (IQR, 13.1-16.0) for stoma closure within 3 months versus 12.0 (IQR, 10.5-13.9) for closure after 3 months (P = 0.001).
Conclusion
A diverting ileostomy is a predictor for an impaired FIQoL after a TME for rectal cancer. Stoma reversal within 3 months showed better outcomes than reversal after 3 months. Patients with a diverting ileostomy should be informed about the impaired QoL, even after stoma closure.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Clinical analysis of different intestinal reconstruction methods after primary cytoreductive surgery combined with rectal resection for advanced ovarian cancer Huimin Wang, Xiaocen Li, Ying Jiang, Jinxin Chen, Rong Cao, Jingru Zhang Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Y después de la cirugía, ¿qué hay de nuevo para el superviviente de cáncer de recto? Arturo Cirera de Tudela, Franco Marinello, Eloy Espín Basany Cirugía Española.2025; 103(4): 237. CrossRef
And after surgery, what’s new for the rectal cancer survivor? Arturo Cirera de Tudela, Franco Marinello, Eloy Espín Basany Cirugía Española (English Edition).2025; 103(4): 237. CrossRef
Neoadjuvante Therapie beim Rektumkarzinom – für wen, wie und mit welchem Ziel? Franziska Willis, Thilo Schwandner, Martin Reichert, Anca-Laura Amati, Daniel Habermehl, Martin Schneider Zentralblatt für Chirurgie - Zeitschrift für Allgemeine, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie.2025; 150(02): 140. CrossRef
Effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training in the recovery of patients after low anterior resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis Min Jeong Kim, Seonmi Yeom, Young Man Kim European Journal of Oncology Nursing.2025; 77: 102918. CrossRef
REACT bowel REcovery after CyToreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer Virginia Vargiu, Andrea Rosati, Francesco Santullo, Matteo Figà, Giovanni Esposito, Silvio Andrea Russo, Guido Lancellotti, Carlo Abatini, Claudio Lodoli, Matteo Loverro, Diana Giannarelli, Barbara Costantini, Angelica Naldini, Anna Fagotti Gynecologic Oncology.2025; 199: 32. CrossRef
Early diverting stoma closure is feasible and safe: results from a before-and-after study on the implementation of an early closure protocol at a tertiary referral center L. Blanco Terés, C. Cerdán Santacruz, A. Correa Bonito, L. Delgado Búrdalo, A. Rodríguez Sánchez, E. Bermejo Marcos, J. García Septiem, E. Martín Pérez Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Factors affecting timing of loop ileostomy closure: a regional centre's experience with 106 patients Tedman Cheuk‐Yiu Chau, Hung Nguyen, Iain K. Robertson, Xavier Harvey, Brendan Tan, Mitchell Tan, Caroline M. Yang ANZ Journal of Surgery.2024; 94(1-2): 193. CrossRef
The Effect of a Temporary Stoma on Long-term Functional Outcomes Following Surgery for Rectal Cancer Sanne J. Verkuijl, Jara E. Jonker, Edgar J.B. Furnée, Wendy Kelder, Christiaan Hoff, Daniel A. Hess, Fennie Wit, Ronald J. Zijlstra, Monika Trzpis, Paul M.A. Broens Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2024; 67(2): 291. CrossRef
Long-term bowel functional outcomes following anal sphincter-preserving surgery for upper and middle rectal cancer: a single-center longitudinal study Ahmad Sakr, Seung Yoon Yang, Min Soo Cho, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(1): 27. CrossRef
The Effect of Pelvic Floor Muscle Exercises on Bowel Evacuation and Quality of Life in Following Intestinal Ostomy Closure Dilek Aktaş, Sema Koçaşlı, Zehra Göçmen Baykara Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing.2024; 51(3): 221. CrossRef
Nomogram for predicting the probability of rectal anastomotic re-leakage after stoma closure: a retrospective study Yuegang Li, Gang Hu, Jinzhu Zhang, Wenlong Qiu, Shiwen Mei, Xishan Wang, Jianqiang Tang BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Quality of life and functional outcome of rectal cancer patients: A prospective cohort study Alexander J. Pennings, Geraldine R. Vink, Sander van Kuijk, Jarno Melenhorst, Geerard L. Beets, Anne M. May, Stephanie O. Breukink Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(11): 1892. CrossRef
Causes and costs of delayed closure of ileostomies in rectal cancer patients in Australasian units Jon Barnard, Tony Milne, Keith Teo, Maree Weston, Lincoln Israel, Sze‐Lin Peng ANZ Journal of Surgery.2023; 93(3): 636. CrossRef
One-Year Treatment-Related Side Effects and Quality of Life After Chemoradiotherapy in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus Anna Cecilie Lefèvre, Eva Serup-Hansen, Katrine Smedegaard Storm, Karen Lycke Wind, Camilla Kronborg, Karen-Lise Garm Spindler International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2023; 115(5): 1165. CrossRef
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic low anterior resection with “dog ear” invagination anastomosis for mid and distal rectal cancer a propensity score matched analysis L. Zhang, Z. Xie, L. Gong, X. Lv Frontiers in Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Management of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) Following Resection for Rectal Cancer Harald Rosen, Christian G. Sebesta, Christian Sebesta Cancers.2023; 15(3): 778. CrossRef
Patient-reported Bowel Function and Bowel-related Quality of Life After Pelvic Radiation for Rectal Adenocarcinoma: The Impact of Radiation Fractionation and Surgical Resection Michael K. Rooney, Brian De, Kelsey Corrigan, Grace L. Smith, Cullen Taniguchi, Bruce D. Minsky, Ethan B. Ludmir, Eugene J. Koay, Prajnan Das, Albert C. Koong, Oliver Peacock, George Chang, Y. Nancy You, Van K. Morris, Graciela Nogueras-González, Emma B. Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2023; 22(2): 211. CrossRef
Prolonged diversion after ileal pouch‐anal anastomosis: Is it safe to wait? Cillian Clancy, Tara M. Connelly, Xue Jia, Jeremy Lipman, Amy L. Lightner, Tracy Hull, Scott R. Steele, Stefan D. Holubar Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(6): 1187. CrossRef
The impact of prolonged delay to loop ileostomy closure on postoperative morbidity and hospital stay: A retrospective cohort study Greg A. Turner, Kari A. Clifford, Rossi Holloway, John C. Woodfield, Mark Thompson‐Fawcett Colorectal Disease.2022; 24(7): 854. CrossRef
Prevalence and Risk Factors of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Surgery Iqra Yasin, Afshan Saeed Usmani, Jibran Mohsin, Rehan Bin Asif, Nazish Kahlid, Aamir Ali Syed Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Patient-Reported Bowel and Urinary Function in Long-Term Survivors of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Anus Treated With Definitive Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy And Concurrent Chemotherapy Brian De, Kelsey L. Corrigan, Michael K. Rooney, Ethan B. Ludmir, Prajnan Das, Grace L. Smith, Cullen M. Taniguchi, Bruce D. Minsky, Eugene J. Koay, Albert Koong, Van K. Morris, Craig A. Messick, Y. Nancy You, George J. Chang, O. Lenaine Westney, Graciela International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2022; 114(1): 78. CrossRef
The Longitudinal Course of Low-anterior Resection Syndrome Chris Varghese, Cameron I. Wells, Greg O’Grady, Peter Christensen, Ian P. Bissett, Celia Keane Annals of Surgery.2022; 276(1): 46. CrossRef
The role of colonic motility in low anterior resection syndrome Chris Varghese, Cameron I. Wells, Ian P. Bissett, Gregory O’Grady, Celia Keane Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Symptoms of anal incontinence and quality of life: a psychometric study of the Norwegian version of the ICIQ-B amongst hospital outpatients Susan Saga, Anne Guttormsen Vinsnes, Christine Norton, Gørill Haugan Archives of Public Health.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of a defunctioning ileostomy and time to stoma closure on bowel function after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis I. Vogel, N. Reeves, P. J. Tanis, W. A. Bemelman, J. Torkington, R. Hompes, J. A. Cornish Techniques in Coloproctology.2021; 25(7): 751. CrossRef
Loop-ileostomy reversal in a 23-h stay setting is safe with high patient satisfaction Kevin Afshari, Maziar Nikberg, Kenneth Smedh, Abbas Chabok Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 56(9): 1126. CrossRef
Low anterior resection syndrome: can it be prevented? Alfredo Annicchiarico, Jacopo Martellucci, Stefano Solari, Maximilian Scheiterle, Carlo Bergamini, Paolo Prosperi International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(12): 2535. CrossRef
Risk factors for developing anorectal dysfunction after anterior resection Kevin Afshari, Kenneth Smedh, Philippe Wagner, Abbas Chabok, Maziar Nikberg International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(12): 2697. CrossRef
Impact of temporary ileostomy on long‐term quality of life and bowel function: a systematic review and meta‐analysis Celia Keane, Puja Sharma, Lance Yuan, Ian Bissett, Greg O'Grady ANZ Journal of Surgery.2020; 90(5): 687. CrossRef
Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in ovarian cancer patients - A multi-centre comparative cohort study Felix Harpain, Marlene Kranawetter, Tobias Zott, Ioannis I. Lazaridis, Marc-Olivier Guenin, Marijana Ninkovic, Irmgard E. Kronberger, Ingrid Tapiolas, Eloy Espin Basany, Bernhard Dauser, Friedrich Herbst, Cherry Koh, Anton Stift, Bela Teleky, Alexander Re International Journal of Surgery.2020; 78: 97. CrossRef
Functional outcomes from a randomized trial of early closure of temporary ileostomy after rectal excision for cancer C Keane, J Park, S Öberg, A Wedin, D Bock, G O'Grady, I Bissett, J Rosenberg, E Angenete British Journal of Surgery.2019; 106(5): 645. CrossRef
Low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer after primary debulking surgery Marlene Kranawetter, Beyhan Ataseven, Christoph Grimm, Stephanie Schneider, Stefan Riss, Pier Alesina, Sonia Prader, Martin K. Walz, Felix Harpain, Anton Stift, Florian Heitz, Alexander Reinthaller, Stephan Polterauer, Philipp Harter, Andreas du Bois Gynecologic Oncology.2019; 154(3): 577. CrossRef
Predictive Factors for Bowel Dysfunction After Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Cross-sectional Study Youn Young Park, Seung Yoon Yang, Yoon Dae Han, Min Soo Cho, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2019; 62(8): 925. CrossRef
Loop-ileostomy reversal—patient-related characteristics influencing time to closure Carl Pontus Gustafsson, Ulf Gunnarsson, Ursula Dahlstrand, Ulrik Lindforss International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2018; 33(5): 593. CrossRef
Protocol for a multicentre, dual prospective and retrospective cohort study investigating timing of ileostomy closure after anterior resection for rectal cancer: The CLOSurE of Ileostomy Timing (CLOSE-IT) study Peter G Vaughan-Shaw, Katherine Gash, Katie Adams, Abigail E Vallance, Sophie A Pilkington, Jared Torkington, Julie A Cornish BMJ Open.2018; 8(10): e023305. CrossRef
Physiotherapy and Anterior Resection Syndrome (PARiS) trial: feasibility study protocol Anna Powell-Chandler, Buddug Rees, Carole Broad, Jared Torkington, Claire O’Neill, Julie A Cornish BMJ Open.2018; 8(6): e021855. CrossRef
Fecal incontinence - Challenges and solutions Nallely Saldana Ruiz, Andreas M Kaiser World Journal of Gastroenterology.2017; 23(1): 11. CrossRef
Is the interval from surgery to ileostomy closure a risk factor for low anterior resection syndrome? R. M. Jiménez‐Rodríguez, J. J. Segura‐Sampedro, I. Rivero‐Belenchón, J. M. Díaz Pavón, A. M. García Cabrera, J. M. Vazquez Monchul, J. Padillo, F. de la Portilla Colorectal Disease.2017; 19(5): 485. CrossRef
Transanal endoscopic operation for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy José Joaquim Ribeiro da Rocha, Mário Vinícius Angelete Alvarez Bernardes, Marley Ribeiro Feitosa, Camila Perazzoli, Vanessa Foresto Machado, Fernanda Maris Peria, Harley Francisco de Oliveira, Omar Feres Acta Cirurgica Brasileira.2016; 31(suppl 1): 29. CrossRef
Low anterior resection syndrome: a survey of the members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC), and the Spanish Society of Coloproctology (AECP) Luis Miguel Jimenez-Gomez, Eloy Espin-Basany, Marc Marti-Gallostra, Jose Luis Sanchez-Garcia, Francesc Vallribera-Valls, Manuel Armengol-Carrasco International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2016; 31(4): 813. CrossRef
Can the Timing of Ileostomy Reversal Influence Functional Outcome? Chang-Nam Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(1): 5. CrossRef
Impaired functional outcome is common after a low anterior resection (LAR). Pelvic floor rehabilitation (PFR) might improve functional outcome after a LAR. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the effectiveness of PFR in improving functional outcome.
Methods
PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched using the terms fecal incontinence, colorectal neoplasm/surgery, LAR, rectal cancer, anterior resection syndrome, bowel habit, pelvic floor, training, therapy, physical therapy, rehabilitation and biofeedback. Of the 125 identified records, 5 articles were included.
Results
The 5 included studies reported on 321 patients, of which 286 patients (89%) underwent pelvic floor training. Three studies included patients with anterior resection syndrome after a LAR while the remaining studies included a series of patients after a LAR. Functional outcome was mostly assessed by using the Wexner incontinence scale. Quality of life was assessed in one study, and in three studies, rectal manometry was performed. After PFR, the functional outcome was improved in four studies, as was the quality of life.
Conclusion
This systematic review demonstrated that PFR is useful for improving the functional outcome after a LAR. The data are extracted from studies of limited quality, but the available evidence points to the effectiveness of the procedure.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
The Japan Society of Coloproctology Practice Guidelines for Fecal Incontinence 2024 (Revised Second Edition) Keiji Koda, Toshiki Mimura, Tetsuo Yamana, Mitsuru Ishizuka, Tomoko Takahashi, Shota Takano, Tatsuya Abe, Yuji Nishizawa, Hidetoshi Katsuno, Masami Sato, Kaoru Nishimura, Masahiro Yoshida, Kotaro Maeda Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2026; 10(1): 64. CrossRef
Pelvic floor muscle training for the prevention and management of low anterior resection syndrome in patients with rectal cancer: An evidence-based summary Meirong Hong, Wei Yu, Yating Gao, Bei Pei, Ji Chen, Yan Lou Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing.2025; 12: 100620. CrossRef
Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Masaaki Miyo, Emi Akizuki, Koichi Okuya, Ai Noda, Masayuki Ishii, Ryo Miura, Momoko Ichihara, Maho Toyota, Kohei Okamoto, Tatsuya Ito, Yuji Akiyama, Ichiro Takemasa Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2025; 9(1): 1. CrossRef
Pathway Of Low Anterior Resection syndrome (LARS) relief after Surgery (POLARiS): protocol for an international, open-label, multi-arm, phase 3 randomised superiority trial within a cohort, with economic evaluation, process evaluation and qualitative sub- Julie Croft, Emily Farrow, Alexandra Harriet Coxon-Meggy, Katie Gordon, Neil Corrigan, Hannah Mather, Deborah D Stocken, Megan Dale, Huey Yi Chong, Judith White, Laura Knight, Alun Meggy, Christina Lloydwin, Betty Tan, Ashley Douglas, Ralph Powell, Julie BMJ Open.2025; 15(2): e092612. CrossRef
Optimal interventions for low anterior resection syndrome: Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials M. Yu, Y. Liu, N. Li, J. Xu, H. Zhang, F. Li, H. Chen, B. Li Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Evaluation of pelvic floor rehabilitation in the prevention of low anterior resection syndrome: Study protocol of the CONTICARE trial Alexandra Poinas, Noémie Périard, Solène Schirr‐Bonnans, Jean‐Benoit Hardouin, Valery‐Pierre Riche, Odile Cormerais, Michel Guérineau, Guy Valancogne, Antoine Hamy, Mehdi Ouaissi, Yannick Tourreau, Jeremie H Lefevre, Abdelli Amar, Emeric Abet, Jean‐Michel Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Treatment options for postoperative faecal incontinence after colorectal surgery Conor Thomas Hamilton, Oonagh McCloy British Journal of Community Nursing.2025; 30(Sup4a): S12. CrossRef
Progress in diagnosis and treatment of postoperative low anterior resection syndrome Wan-Jing Diao, Yi Ji, Jie-Ge Huo World Chinese Journal of Digestology.2025; 33(6): 448. CrossRef
The Landscape of Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation: A Bibliometric Analysis Jie Hao, Zixuan Yao, Andréas Remis, Xin Yu, Yuxiao Sun International Urogynecology Journal.2025; 36(12): 2455. CrossRef
Evaluating transanal irrigation for alleviating symptoms of low anterior resection syndrome post rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis Ting-Kuang Wang, Chien-Hsin Chen, Yi-No Kang, Chiehfeng Chen, Kee-Hsin Chen Surgery.2025; 185: 109532. CrossRef
A 2-year prospective study on the evolution of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) following rectal cancer surgery L. Lauwereins, A. D’Hoore, E. Coeckelberghs, S. Fieuws, A. Wolthuis, G. Bislenghi, Y. Van Molhem, B. Van Geluwe, L. Debrun, N. Devoogdt, A. De Groef, A. Asnong, I. Geraerts International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Challenges in evaluating pelvic floor physiotherapy based strategies in low anterior resection syndrome: a systematic review and qualitative analysis Lauren J. Lambrineas, Henry G. Brock, Hwa Ian Ong, Santha Tisseverasinghe, Emma Carrington, Alexander Heriot, Adele Burgess, David Proud, Helen Mohan Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(2): 258. CrossRef
The Effect of a Temporary Stoma on Long-term Functional Outcomes Following Surgery for Rectal Cancer Sanne J. Verkuijl, Jara E. Jonker, Edgar J.B. Furnée, Wendy Kelder, Christiaan Hoff, Daniel A. Hess, Fennie Wit, Ronald J. Zijlstra, Monika Trzpis, Paul M.A. Broens Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2024; 67(2): 291. CrossRef
The effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions on fecal incontinence and quality of life following colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Ming Yan Pun, Pak Ho Leung, Tsz Ching Chan, Chunn Pang, Kin Hei Chan, Priya Kannan Supportive Care in Cancer.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Treatment of anterior resection syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis Lu Zhou, Zhengyang Zhang, Ling Wang European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024; 50(6): 108336. CrossRef
Pelvic Floor Physical Therapy Prehabilitation (PrePFPT) for the prevention of low anterior resection syndrome Nathan A. Coppersmith, Kurt S. Schultz, Andrew C. Esposito, Kimberly Reinhart, Emily Ray, Ira L. Leeds, Haddon J. Pantel, Vikram B. Reddy, Walter E. Longo, Anne K. Mongiu Surgical Oncology Insight.2024; 1(4): 100097. CrossRef
Application of pelvic floor rehabilitation in patients with colorectal cancer: a scoping review Lu Zhou, Changkun Zhong, Yuanyuan Su, Zhengyang Zhang, Ling Wang Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Guideline for the assessment and management of gastrointestinal symptoms following colorectal surgery—A UEG/ESCP/EAES/ESPCG/ESPEN/ESNM/ESSO collaboration. Part I—Sequelae to oncological diseases Anke H. C. Gielen United European Gastroenterology Journal.2024; 12(10): 1489. CrossRef
Transanal Irrigation in Patients with Low Anterior Resection Syndrome After Rectal-Sphincter-Preserving Surgery for Oncological and Non-Oncological Disease: A Systematic Review Andrea Morini, Massimiliano Fabozzi, Magda Zanelli, Francesca Sanguedolce, Andrea Palicelli, Alfredo Annicchiarico, Candida Bonelli, Maurizio Zizzo Surgical Techniques Development.2024; 13(4): 409. CrossRef
Management of treatment‐related sequelae following colorectal cancer Susanne Haas, Anette Højer Mikkelsen, Camilla Jensenius Skovhus Kronborg, Birthe T. Oggesen, Pia F. Møller, Janne Fassov, Nina Abild Frederiksen, Marianne Krogsgaard, Charlotte Graugaard‐Jensen, Lise Ventzel, Peter Christensen, Katrine Jøssing Emmertsen Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(3): 458. CrossRef
The Effectiveness of a Self-management Program of Bowel Dysfunction in Patients With Mid and Low Rectal Cancer After Sphincter-Preserving Surgery Cong Li, Zhao-Yu Li, Qian Lu, Yu-Jie Zhou, Xue-Ying Qin, Ai-Wen Wu, Dong Pang Cancer Nursing.2023; 46(1): 67. CrossRef
A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Transanal Irrigation Versus Conservative Treatment in Patients With Low Anterior Resection Syndrome After Rectal Cancer Surgery Emil H.A. Pieniowski, Charlotta M. Bergström, Caroline A.M. Nordenvall, Karin S. Westberg, Asif M. Johar, Susanne F. Tumlin Ekelund, Kristina R. Larsson, Klas J. Pekkari, Gabriella C. Jansson Palmer, Pernilla Lagergren, Mirna Abraham-Nordling Annals of Surgery.2023; 277(1): 30. CrossRef
Effectiveness of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training for Patients Following Low Anterior Resection Young Man Kim, Eui Geum Oh Journal of Wound, Ostomy & Continence Nursing.2023; 50(2): 142. CrossRef
Low anterior resection syndrome Matthew C. Hernandez, Paul Wong, Kurt Melstrom Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 127(8): 1271. CrossRef
Incidencia y manejo fisioterápico del síndrome de resección anterior bajo M.J. Escribano Martínez, J.D. Turiño-Luque Fisioterapia.2023; 45(6): 326. CrossRef
Clinical Management of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Review of the Current Diagnosis and Treatment Ruijia Zhang, Wenqin Luo, Yulin Qiu, Fan Chen, Dakui Luo, Yufei Yang, Weijing He, Qingguo Li, Xinxiang Li Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5011. CrossRef
Acupuncture for Rectal Cancer Patients with Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: A Mixed Method Pilot Study Protocol Ming Yang, Honglin Jiang, Lin Xu, Qiaoli Zhang, Xun Li, Liu Han, Yudong Bao, Lu Yang, Mi Zhang, Lihua Zheng, Ningyuan Liu, Jianping Liu, Jinchang Huang Perspectives on Integrative Medicine.2023; 2(3): 195. CrossRef
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Predisposing Factors and Treatment Richard Garfinkle, Marylise Boutros Surgical Oncology.2022; 43: 101691. CrossRef
A national survey of oncology physiotherapy services for cancer survivors in Australia Daniel A. Shipton, Amy M. Dennett, Alesha M. Sayner, Clarice Y. Tang Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Patienten mit Uro- und Kolostoma in der Rehabilitation Jürgen Körber, Wilfried Hoffmann Der Onkologe.2022; 28(3): 203. CrossRef
Colorectal nursing and low anterior resection syndrome Ellie Bradshaw British Journal of Nursing.2022; 31(4): 194. CrossRef
Patienten mit Uro- und Kolostoma in der Rehabilitation Jürgen Körber, Wilfried Hoffmann best practice onkologie.2022; 17(6): 274. CrossRef
Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation After Rectal Cancer Surgery J. A. G. van der Heijden, A. J. Kalkdijk-Dijkstra, J. P. E. N. Pierie, H. L. van Westreenen, P. M. A. Broens, B. R. Klarenbeek Annals of Surgery.2022; 276(1): 38. CrossRef
Efficacy of Tibial Nerve Stimulation on Fecal Incontinence in Patients With Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Following Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Aigul Tazhikova, Abay Makishev, Aizhan Bekisheva, Mariya Dmitriyeva, Medet Toleubayev, Alina Sabitova Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine.2022; 46(3): 142. CrossRef
The Role of Pelvic Floor Muscle Training on Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Anne Asnong, André D’Hoore, Marijke Van Kampen, Albert Wolthuis, Yves Van Molhem, Bart Van Geluwe, Nele Devoogdt, An De Groef, Ipek Guler Caamano Fajardo, Inge Geraerts Annals of Surgery.2022; 276(5): 761. CrossRef
Low anterior resection syndrome: An unavoidable price to pay to preserve the rectum? Franco Marinello, Gianluca Pellino, Eloy Espín-Basany Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Optimising functional outcomes in rectal cancer surgery Fabio Nocera, Fiorenzo Angehrn, Markus von Flüe, Daniel C. Steinemann Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2021; 406(2): 233. CrossRef
Biofeedback for Pelvic Floor Disorders Melissa Hite, Thomas Curran Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2021; 34(01): 056. CrossRef
Efficacy of pelvic floor rehabilitation for bowel dysfunction after anterior resection for colorectal cancer: a systematic review K. Y. C. Chan, M. Suen, S. Coulson, Janette L. Vardy Supportive Care in Cancer.2021; 29(4): 1795. CrossRef
Management guidelines for low anterior resection syndrome – the MANUEL project Peter Christensen, Coen IM Baeten, Eloy Espín‐Basany, Jacopo Martellucci, Karen P Nugent, Frank Zerbib, Gianluca Pellino, Harald Rosen Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(2): 461. CrossRef
Randomised controlled trial to assess efficacy of pelvic floor muscle training on bowel symptoms after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: study protocol Anne Asnong, André D"Hoore, Marijke Van Kampen, Nele Devoogdt, An De Groef, Kim Sterckx, Hilde Lemkens, Albert Wolthuis, Yves Van Molhem, Bart Van Geluwe, Lynn Debrun, Inge Geraerts BMJ Open.2021; 11(1): e041797. CrossRef
Nurse‐led standardized intervention for low anterior resection syndrome. A population‐based pilot study Peter Dalsgaard, Katrine Jøssing Emmertsen, Mira Mekhael, Søren Laurberg, Peter Christensen Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(2): 434. CrossRef
Impact of a defunctioning ileostomy and time to stoma closure on bowel function after low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis I. Vogel, N. Reeves, P. J. Tanis, W. A. Bemelman, J. Torkington, R. Hompes, J. A. Cornish Techniques in Coloproctology.2021; 25(7): 751. CrossRef
Financial and occupational impact of low anterior resection syndrome in rectal cancer survivors Richard Garfinkle, Aurelie Ky, Aashiyan Singh, Nancy Morin, Gabriela Ghitulescu, Julio Faria, Carol‐Ann Vasilevsky, Marylise Boutros Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(7): 1777. CrossRef
Anterior resection syndrome: a randomized clinical trial of a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist (ramosetron) in male patients with rectal cancer S -B Ryoo, J W Park, D W Lee, M A Lee, Y -H Kwon, M J Kim, S H Moon, S -Y Jeong, K J Park British Journal of Surgery.2021; 108(6): 644. CrossRef
A study on the clinical application of greater omental pedicle flap transplantation to correct anterior resection syndrome in patients with low rectal cancer Haiquan Qin, Linghou Meng, Zigao Huang, Jiankun Liao, Yan Feng, Shanshan Luo, Hao Lai, Weizhong Tang, Xianwei Mo Regenerative Therapy.2021; 18: 146. CrossRef
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: A Questionnaire Survey for Colorectal Surgeons in Tokyo and the Surrounding Districts Hiroyoshi Matsuoka, Masamichi Yasuno, Keiichi Takahashi, Kimihiko Funahashi, Yoshihisa Saida, Michio Itabashi, Keiji Matsuda, Shouichi Fujii, Shinpei Ogawa, Takeshi Yamada, Ken Etoh, Tadahiko Masaki Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2021; 74(7): 430. CrossRef
A randomized clinical trial to assess the effectiveness of pre- and post-surgical pelvic floor physiotherapy for bowel symptoms, pelvic floor function, and quality of life of patients with rectal cancer: CARRET protocol Cinara Sacomori, Luz Alejandra Lorca, Mónica Martinez-Mardones, Roberto Ignacio Salas-Ocaranza, Guillermo Patricio Reyes-Reyes, Marta Natalia Pizarro-Hinojosa, Jorge Plasser-Troncoso Trials.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
A novel bowel rehabilitation programme after total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: the BOREAL pilot study Deena Harji, Benjamin Fernandez, Lara Boissieras, Arthur Berger, Maylis Capdepont, Frank Zerbib, Eric Rullier, Quentin Denost Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(10): 2619. CrossRef
Low anterior resection syndrome: can it be prevented? Alfredo Annicchiarico, Jacopo Martellucci, Stefano Solari, Maximilian Scheiterle, Carlo Bergamini, Paolo Prosperi International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(12): 2535. CrossRef
LARS: A review of therapeutic options and their efficacy Kheng-Seong Ng, Marc A Gladman Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2021; 32(4): 100849. CrossRef
Effect of Biofeedback Therapy during Temporary Stoma Period in Rectal Cancer Patients: A Prospective Randomized Trial Hyeon-Min Cho, Hyungjin Kim, RiNa Yoo, Gun Kim, Bong-Hyeon Kye Journal of Clinical Medicine.2021; 10(21): 5172. CrossRef
Functional outcomes after sphincter-preserving surgeries for low-lying rectal cancer: A review Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik Precision and Future Medicine.2021; 5(4): 164. CrossRef
Fecal Incontinence Diagnosed by the Rome IV Criteria in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom William E. Whitehead, Magnus Simren, Jan Busby-Whitehead, Steve Heymen, Miranda A.L. van Tilburg, Ami D. Sperber, Olafur S. Palsson Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2020; 18(2): 385. CrossRef
Pelvic floor rehabilitation to improve functional outcome and quality of life after surgery for rectal cancer: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial (FORCE trial) A.J. Kalkdijk-Dijkstra, J.A.G. van der Heijden, H.L. van Westreenen, P.M.A. Broens, M. Trzpis, J.P.E.N. Pierie, B.R. Klarenbeek Trials.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
‘French LARS score’: validation of the French version of the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score for measuring bowel dysfunction after sphincter-preserving surgery among rectal cancer patients: a study protocol Yassine Eid, Véronique Bouvier, Olivier Dejardin, Benjamin Menahem, Fabien Chaillot, Yannick Chene, Jean Jacques Dutheil, Therese Juul, Rémy Morello, Arnaud Alves BMJ Open.2020; 10(3): e034251. CrossRef
Low anterior resection syndrome in a Scandinavian population of patients with rectal cancer: a longitudinal follow‐up within the QoLiRECT study S. Sandberg, D. Asplund, T. Bisgaard, D. Bock, E. González, L. Karlsson, P. Matthiessen, B. Ohlsson, J. Park, J. Rosenberg, S. Skullman, M. Sörensson, E. Angenete Colorectal Disease.2020; 22(10): 1367. CrossRef
Five-year single center experience of sacral neuromodulation for isolated fecal incontinence or fecal incontinence combined with low anterior resection syndrome C. De Meyere, F. Nuytens, I. Parmentier, M. D’Hondt Techniques in Coloproctology.2020; 24(9): 947. CrossRef
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Theresa H. Nguyen, Reena V. Chokshi Current Gastroenterology Reports.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Nachsorge und Behandlung funktioneller Störungen nach operativer Therapie des Rektumkarzinoms C. Holmer Der Onkologe.2020; 26(12): 1154. CrossRef
Changes to gastrointestinal function after surgery for colorectal cancer David Lam, Oliver Jones Best Practice & Research Clinical Gastroenterology.2020; 48-49: 101705. CrossRef
Randomized Pilot Trial of Percutaneous Posterior Tibial Nerve Stimulation Versus Medical Therapy for the Treatment of Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: One-Year Follow-up Dajana Cuicchi, Francesca Di Fabio, Alessandra Guido, Fabiola Lorena Rojas Llimpe, Alessio G. Morganti, Andrea Ardizzoni, Maurizio Coscia, Gilberto Poggioli Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2020; 63(12): 1602. CrossRef
Comment améliorer la fonction anorectale après proctectomie ? E. Duchalais, G. Meurette Côlon & Rectum.2019; 13(1): 5. CrossRef
Survivorship Guidance for Patients with Colorectal Cancer Jillian Simard, Suneel Kamath, Sheetal Kircher Current Treatment Options in Oncology.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Etiology and management of low anterior resection syndrome based on the normal defecation mechanism Keiji Koda, Masato Yamazaki, Kiyohiko Shuto, Chihiro Kosugi, Mikito Mori, Kazuo Narushima, Isamu Hosokawa, Hiroaki Shimizu Surgery Today.2019; 49(10): 803. CrossRef
Health-Related Quality of Life in Older Adults with Colorectal Cancer Evan Lapinsky, Lillian C. Man, Amy R. MacKenzie Current Oncology Reports.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Implementation of a Postoperative Screening and Treatment Guidance for the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Preliminary Results Joost A.G. van der Heijden, Maarten van Heinsbergen, Gwendolyn Thomas, Freeke Caers, Gerrit D. Slooter, Adriana J.G. Maaskant-Braat Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2019; 62(9): 1033. CrossRef
Postoperative Bowel Function After Anal Sphincter-Preserving Rectal Cancer Surgery: Risks Factors, Diagnostic Modalities, and Management Chris George Cura Pales, Sanghyun An, Jan Paolo Cruz, Kwangmin Kim, Youngwan Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2019; 35(4): 160. CrossRef
Efficacy of biofeedback therapy for objective improvement of pelvic function in low anterior resection syndrome Kyung Ha Lee, Jin Soo Kim, Ji Yeon Kim Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2019; 97(4): 194. CrossRef
Expert Commentary on Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Larissa K.F. Temple Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2019; 62(12): 1423. CrossRef
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome Nicholas P. McKenna Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2019; 62(12): 1420. CrossRef
Critical research gaps and recommendations to inform research prioritisation for more effective prevention and improved outcomes in colorectal cancer Mark Lawler, Deborah Alsina, Richard A Adams, Annie S Anderson, Gina Brown, Nicola S Fearnhead, Stephen W Fenwick, Stephen P Halloran, Daniel Hochhauser, Mark A Hull, Viktor H Koelzer, Angus G K McNair, Kevin J Monahan, Inke Näthke, Christine Norton, Marc Gut.2018; 67(1): 179. CrossRef
Developing advanced clinical practice skills in gastrointestinal consequences of cancer treatment Caroline Gee, Jervoise Andreyev, Ann Muls Gastrointestinal Nursing.2018; 16(2): 27. CrossRef
Treatment possibilities for low anterior resection syndrome: a review of the literature Audrius Dulskas, Edgaras Smolskas, Inga Kildusiene, Narimantas E. Samalavicius International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2018; 33(3): 251. CrossRef
Developing advanced clinical practice skills in gastrointestinal consequences of cancer treatment Caroline Gee, Jervoise Andreyev, Ann Muls British Journal of Nursing.2018; 27(5): 237. CrossRef
Antegrade Enema After Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: The Last Chance to Avoid Definitive Colostomy for Refractory Low Anterior Resection Syndrome and Fecal Incontinence Romain Didailler, Quentin Denost, Paula Loughlin, Edouard Chabrun, Julie Ricard, Flor Picard, Frank Zerbib, Eric Rullier Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2018; 61(6): 667. CrossRef
Adult Inflammatory Bowel Disease, Physical Rehabilitation, and Structured Exercise Jessica Elia, Sunanda Kane Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2018; 24(12): 2543. CrossRef
Role of transanal irrigation in the treatment of anterior resection syndrome J. Martellucci, A. Sturiale, C. Bergamini, L. Boni, F. Cianchi, A. Coratti, A. Valeri Techniques in Coloproctology.2018; 22(7): 519. CrossRef
Le syndrome de résection antérieure du rectum. Quels messages délivrer aux praticiens et aux patients en 2018 ? T. Sarcher, B. Dupont, A. Alves, B. Menahem Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale.2018; 155(5): 390. CrossRef
Anterior resection syndrome: What should we tell practitioners and patients in 2018? T. Sarcher, B. Dupont, A. Alves, B. Menahem Journal of Visceral Surgery.2018; 155(5): 383. CrossRef
Transanal irrigation in lower anterior resection syndrome (LARS): a case study Amanda Eccles Gastrointestinal Nursing.2018; 16(8): 24. CrossRef
Comparison of Pelvic Autonomic Nerve Function Recovery between the Group only with Surgery and Group with Additional Acupuncture and Electrotherapy for Treatment in Patients with Rectal Cancer after Anus-Preserving Operation Jiaying Zhao, Yuankun Cai, Huipeng Wang, Yan Zhou, Yanbin Zhang, Wenjie Chen, Chenxia Shen, Tao Ye Acupuncture & Electro-Therapeutics Research: International Journal of Integrated Medicine.2018; 43(2): 103. CrossRef
Physiotherapy and Anterior Resection Syndrome (PARiS) trial: feasibility study protocol Anna Powell-Chandler, Buddug Rees, Carole Broad, Jared Torkington, Claire O’Neill, Julie A Cornish BMJ Open.2018; 8(6): e021855. CrossRef
Functional outcome following rectal surgery—predisposing factors for low anterior resection syndrome Daniel Ll Hughes, Julie Cornish, Chris Morris International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2017; 32(5): 691. CrossRef
Successful Restoration of Fecal Continence Using Sacral Nerve Stimulation Following Chemoradiation and Transanal Excision of an Anal Melanoma With Partial Internal Anal Sphincter Resection: A Case Report Tyler Cameron Tolopka, Craig A. Messick Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface.2017; 20(8): 783. CrossRef
A Systematic Review of Exercise Systematic Reviews in the Cancer Literature (2005‐2017) Nicole L. Stout, Jennifer Baima, Anne K. Swisher, Kerri M. Winters‐Stone, Judith Welsh PM&R.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Aspectos fisiopatológicos da síndrome pós-ressecção anterior do reto para o tratamento de câncer retal Kelly Cristine de Lacerda Rodrigues Buzatti, Andy Petroianu Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões.2017; 44(4): 397. CrossRef
Management of surgical challenges in actively treated cancer patients David A. Santos, Adnan Alseidi, Vickie R. Shannon, Craig Messick, Guobin Song, Celia Robinson Ledet, Hun Lee, An Ngo-Huang, George J. Francis, Arash Asher Current Problems in Surgery.2017; 54(12): 612. CrossRef
Short‐term outcome of percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for low anterior resection syndrome: results of a pilot study D. F. Altomare, A. Picciariello, C. Ferrara, R. Digennaro, Y. Ribas, M. De Fazio Colorectal Disease.2017; 19(9): 851. CrossRef
Pelvic floor muscle exercise for fecal incontinence quality of life after coloanal anastomosis Shu‐Ling Hung, Yu‐Hua Lin, Hsing‐Yu Yang, Chia‐Chan Kao, Hong‐Yu Tung, Li‐Hsiang Wei Journal of Clinical Nursing.2016; 25(17-18): 2658. CrossRef
The Effect of Biofeedback Therapy on Anorectal Function After the Reversal of Temporary Stoma When Administered During the Temporary Stoma Period in Rectal Cancer Patients With Sphincter-Saving Surgery Bong-Hyeon Kye, Hyung-Jin Kim, Gun Kim, Ri Na Yoo, Hyeon-Min Cho Medicine.2016; 95(18): e3611. CrossRef
Toward a National Initiative in Cancer Rehabilitation: Recommendations From a Subject Matter Expert Group Nicole L. Stout, Julie K. Silver, Vishwa S. Raj, Julia Rowland, Lynn Gerber, Andrea Cheville, Kirsten K. Ness, Mary Radomski, Ralph Nitkin, Michael D. Stubblefield, G. Stephen Morris, Ana Acevedo, Zavera Brandon, Brent Braveman, Schuyler Cunningham, Laura Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.2016; 97(11): 2006. CrossRef
Lengthening of left colon after rectal resection: What all is adequate? A prospective cohort study Shruthi H.S. Reddy, Vikas Gupta, Thakur D. Yadav, Gurpreet Singh, Daisy Sahni International Journal of Surgery.2016; 31: 27. CrossRef
Low anterior resection syndrome: a survey of the members of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the Spanish Association of Surgeons (AEC), and the Spanish Society of Coloproctology (AECP) Luis Miguel Jimenez-Gomez, Eloy Espin-Basany, Marc Marti-Gallostra, Jose Luis Sanchez-Garcia, Francesc Vallribera-Valls, Manuel Armengol-Carrasco International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2016; 31(4): 813. CrossRef
Effects of pelvic floor muscle exercise on faecal incontinence in rectal cancer patients after stoma closure Y.-H. Lin, H.-Y. Yang, S.-L. Hung, H.-P. Chen, K.-W. Liu, T.-B. Chen, S.-C. Chi European Journal of Cancer Care.2016; 25(3): 449. CrossRef
Conversations for providers caring for patients with rectal cancer: Comparison of long‐term patient‐centered outcomes for patients with low rectal cancer facing ostomy or sphincter‐sparing surgery Lisa J. Herrinton, Andrea Altschuler, Carmit K. McMullen, Joanna E. Bulkley, Mark C. Hornbrook, Virginia Sun, Christopher S. Wendel, Marcia Grant, Carol M. Baldwin, Wendy Demark‐Wahnefried, Larissa K. F. Temple, Robert S. Krouse CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.2016; 66(5): 387. CrossRef
Physical examination of the female cancer patient with sexual concerns: What oncologists and patients should expect from consultation with a specialist Stacy Tessler Lindau, Emily M. Abramsohn, Shirley R. Baron, Judith Florendo, Hope K. Haefner, Anuja Jhingran, Vanessa Kennedy, Mukta K. Krane, David M. Kushner, Jennifer McComb, Diane F. Merritt, Julie E. Park, Amy Siston, Margaret Straub, Lauren Streiche CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.2016; 66(3): 241. CrossRef
Quality of Life After a Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer in Elderly Patients Verena N.N. Kornmann, Marieke S. Walma, Marnix A.J. de Roos, Djamila Boerma, Henderik L. van Westreenen Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(1): 27. CrossRef
Biofeedback Therapy After Sphincter-Preservation Surgery for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer Ik Yong Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(4): 119. CrossRef
Role of electromyography and functional electrical stimulation in the treatment of anorectal diseases Katarzyna Borycka-Kiciak, Karolina Wawiernia, Jan Namysł, Krystyna Garstka-Namysł, Wiesław Tarnowski Polish Journal of Surgery.2015;[Epub] CrossRef
Biofeedback Therapy Before Ileostomy Closure in Patients Undergoing Sphincter-Saving Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Pilot Study Jeong-Ki Kim, Byeong Geon Jeon, Yoon Suk Song, Mi Sun Seo, Yoon-Hye Kwon, JI Won Park, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(4): 138. CrossRef
Pregnancy and Postpartum Bowel Changes: Constipation and Fecal Incontinence Grace Hewon Shin, Erin Lucinda Toto, Ron Schey American Journal of Gastroenterology.2015; 110(4): 521. CrossRef
A systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation for low anterior resection syndrome L. Ramage, S. Qiu, C. Kontovounisios, P. Tekkis, S. Rasheed, E. Tan Colorectal Disease.2015; 17(9): 762. CrossRef
Spätpostoperative Komplikationen und Folgezustände nach Rektumresektion J. Reibetanz, M. Kim, C.-T. Germer, N. Schlegel Der Chirurg.2015; 86(4): 326. CrossRef
Delorme's procedure is infrequently applied in young adults because of its assumed higher recurrence rate. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy of the Delorme's technique in younger adults.
Methods
Fifty-two consecutive patients were entered in our study. We followed patients for at least 30 months. Their complaints and clinical exam results were noted.
Results
Our study included 52 patients (mean age, 38.44 years; standard deviation, 13.7 years). Of the included patients, 41 (78.8%) were younger than 50 years of age, and 11 (21.1%) were older than 50 years of age. No postoperative mortalities or major complications were noted. Minor complications were seen in 5 patients (9.6%) after surgery. The mean hospital stay was 2.5 days. In the younger group (age ≤50 years), fecal incontinence was improved in 92.3% (12 out of 13 with previous incontinence) of the patients, and recurrence was seen in 9.75% (4 patients). In the older group (age >50 years), fecal incontinence was improved in 20% (1 out of 5 with previous incontinence) of the patients, and recurrence was seen in 18.2% (2 patients). In 50% of the patients with a previous recurrence (3 out of 6 patients) following Delorme's procedure as a secondary procedure, recurrence was observed.
Conclusion
Delorme's procedure, especially in younger patients, is a relatively safe and effective treatment and should not be restricted to older frail patients. This procedure may not be suitable for recurrent cases.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Long-Term Outcomes of Transvaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Suture Rectopexy Henry H. Chill, Alireza Hadizadeh, Angela Leffelman, Claudia Paya Ten, Cecilia Chang, Roger P. Goldberg, Ghazaleh Rostaminia International Urogynecology Journal.2025; 36(7): 1425. CrossRef
Safety of concurrent transvaginal rectopexy at time of transvaginal apical prolapse repair: A comparative study Henry H. Chill, Sonia Gilani, Alireza Hadizadeh, Cecilia Chang, Nani P. Moss, Roger P. Goldberg, Ghazaleh Rostaminia European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2025; 312: 114512. CrossRef
Management of recurrent external rectal prolapse. A single center experience Alessandro Sturiale, Lisa Fralleone, Bernardina Fabiani, Claudia Menconi, Vittorio d'Adamo, Gabriele Naldini Surgery Open Digestive Advance.2024; 14: 100137. CrossRef
Delorme's procedure for urgent rectal prolapse – A video vignette A. Teresa Calderón Duque, Esther María Cano Pecharromán, Javier Broekhuizen Benítez, Laura Arriero Ollero, Lourdes Gómez Ruiz, Tomas Balsa Marín Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(3): 513. CrossRef
External rectal prolapse: more than meets the eye M. Yiasemidou, C. Yates, E. Cooper, R. Goldacre, I. Lindsey Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(10): 783. CrossRef
Delorme’s vs. Altemeier’s in the management of rectal procidentia: systematic review and meta-analysis Pratik Bhattacharya, Mohammad Iqbal Hussain, Shafquat Zaman, Sophie Randle, Yousaf Tanveer, Nameer Faiz, Diwakar Ryali Sarma, Rajeev Peravali Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
What are the surgical options for recurrent rectal prolapse – retrospective single-center experience Tomasz Kościński, Krzysztof Szmyt Polish Journal of Surgery.2023; 96(1): 22. CrossRef
Trends in the surgical management of rectal prolapse: An Asian experience Yvonne Ying‐Ru Ng, Emile John Kwong Wei Tan, Cherylin Wan Pei Fu Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2022; 15(1): 110. CrossRef
Surgical Treatment of Full-Thickness Rectal Prolapse (FTRP): a Case Series Analysis Przemysław Ciesielski, Magdalena Szczotko, Małgorzata Kołodziejczak Indian Journal of Surgery.2021; 83(3): 634. CrossRef
Procedimiento de Altemeier para la reparación de prolapso rectal tras resección anterior de recto interesfinteriana con escisión mesorrectal total por vía transanal Eloy Maldonado Marcos, Pere Planellas Giné, Júlia Gil Garcia, Ramon Farrés Coll, Antoni Codina Cazador Cirugía Española.2021; 99(5): 389. CrossRef
Altemeier procedure for rectal prolapse after intersphincteric low anterior resection with transanal total mesorectal excision Eloy Maldonado Marcos, Pere Planellas Giné, Júlia Gil Garcia, Ramon Farrés Coll, Antoni Codina Cazador Cirugía Española (English Edition).2021; 99(5): 389. CrossRef
Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy vs Delorme's operation in management of complete rectal prolapse: a prospective randomized study S. H. Emile, H. Elbanna, M. Youssef, W. Thabet, W. Omar, A. Elshobaky, T. M. Abd El‐Hamed, M. Farid Colorectal Disease.2017; 19(1): 50. CrossRef
The evolution of evaluation and management of urinary or fecal incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse Scott R. Steele, Madhulika G. Varma, David Prichard, Adil E. Bharucha, Sarah A. Vogler, Askin Erdogan, Satish S.C. Rao, Ann C. Lowry, Erin O. Lange, Glen M. Hall, Joshua I.S. Bleier, Anthony J. Senagore, Justin Maykel, Sook Y. Chan, Ian M. Paquette, Marie Current Problems in Surgery.2015; 52(2): 17. CrossRef
Komplikationen nach Rektumprolapsoperationen T.H.K. Schiedeck Der Chirurg.2015; 86(8): 747. CrossRef
A systematic review of the literature on the surgical management of recurrent rectal prolapse A. Hotouras, Y. Ribas, S. Zakeri, C. Bhan, S. D. Wexner, C. L. Chan, J. Murphy Colorectal Disease.2015; 17(8): 657. CrossRef
Outcome of the Delorme procedure for the management of complete rectal prolapse in children Mohamed Rabae The Egyptian Journal of Surgery.2014; 33(4): 260. CrossRef
Surgery for an anal fistula may result in recurrence or impairment of continence. The ideal treatment for an anal fistula should be associated with low recurrence rates, minimal incontinence and good quality of life. Because of the risk of a change in continence with conventional techniques, sphincter-preserving techniques for the management complex anal fistulae have been evaluated. First, the anal fistula plug is made of lyophilized porcine intestinal submucosa. The anal fistula plug is expected to provide a collagen scaffold to promote tissue in growth and fistula healing. Another addition to the sphincter-preserving options is the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract procedure. This technique is based on the concept of secure closure of the internal opening and concomitant removal of infected cryptoglandular tissue in the intersphincteric plane. Recently, cell therapy for an anal fistula has been described. Adipose-derived stem cells have two biologic properties, namely, ability to suppress inflammation and differentiation potential. These properties are useful for the regeneration or the repair of damaged tissues. This article discusses the rationales for, the estimated efficacies of, and the limitations of new sphincter-preserving techniques for the treatment of anal fistulae.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Sensitivity of Diffusion-Weighted Image Combined with T2 Turbo Inversion Recovery Magnitude Sequence and as an Alternative to Contrast-Enhanced MRI in the Detection of Perianal Fistula Noor Fadhil Baqir, Rasha Sabeeh Ahmed, Khaleel Ibraheem Mohsen Advanced Engineering Research (Rostov-on-Don).2023; 23(3): 307. CrossRef
A PILOT STUDY on the Clinical and Functional Outcomes of an Improvised Technique of Core-cut Fistulectomy for Fistula-in-ano Masoom Parwez, Tanweerul Huda, Moorat S. Yadav, Kamal Gupta, Kushal Mital, Bharati Pandya Surgical Innovation.2022; 29(3): 426. CrossRef
Diagnostic Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detection of Perianal Fistula keeping Surgical Findings as Gold Standard Haider Ali, Uzma Azmat, Manoj Kumar , Khadijah Abid Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences.2022; : 181. CrossRef
Surgical technique: an improvisation in application of the technique of core-cut fistulectomy for fistula-in-ano Masoom Parwez, Tanweerul Huda, Kushal Mital, Bharati Pandya Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
External sphincter-sparing anal fistulotomy (ESSAF): a simplified technique for the treatment of fistula-in-ano S. Y. Parnasa, B. Helou, I. Mizrahi, R. Gefen, M. Abu-Gazala, A. J. Pikarsky, N. Shussman Techniques in Coloproctology.2021; 25(12): 1311. CrossRef
Management of transsphincteric fistula-in-ano by modified conventional Ksharasutra therapy Khusboo Faridi, P. Sreenadh, Vyasadeva Mahanta, Rahul Sherkhane Journal of Ayurveda Case Reports.2021; 4(3): 95. CrossRef
Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT) for complex anorectal fistula: efficacy and risk factors for failure at 3-year follow-up L. Regusci, F. Fasolini, P. Meinero, G. Caccia, G. Ruggeri, M. Serati, A. Braga Techniques in Coloproctology.2020; 24(7): 741. CrossRef
Video-assisted Treatment of Rectal Fistulas: the Experience and Treatment Results Vitalii S. Groshilin, Viktoria G. Brizhak, Evgeny Y. Khoronko, Petr V. Tsygankov, Yuri V. Khoronko Lietuvos chirurgija.2020; 19(1-2): 27. CrossRef
Innovative Use of Endotracheal Tube to Find Out Internal Opening in Fistula in Ano Anil Kumar, Ajeet Kumar, Bindey Kumar, Shiv Kishor SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine.2019; 1(9): 712. CrossRef
Ayurvedic Management of Fistula in Ano KM Pratap Shankar, GN SreeDeepthi, Rohit KS, GK Swamy Journal of Research in Ayurvedic Sciences.2019; 3(3): 100. CrossRef
Decellularized and matured esophageal scaffold for circumferential esophagus replacement: Proof of concept in a pig model Guillaume Luc, Guillaume Charles, Caroline Gronnier, Magali Cabau, Charlotte Kalisky, Mallory Meulle, Reine Bareille, Samantha Roques, Lionel Couraud, Johanna Rannou, Laurence Bordenave, Denis Collet, Marlène Durand Biomaterials.2018; 175: 1. CrossRef
Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract procedure and its modifications Ahmed Mohamed Elsayed Metwalli Ali Gendia, Mahmmad Ahmad Abd-erRazik, Hanna Habib Hanna Journal of Coloproctology.2018; 38(04): 324. CrossRef
High ligation of the anal fistula tract by lateral approach: A prospective cohort study on a modification of the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) technique Wook Ho Kang, Hyung Kyu Yang, Han Jeong Chang, Yong Taek Ko, Byung Eun Yoo, Cheong Ho Lim, Jae Kwan Hwang, Young Chan Lee, Hyeon Keun Shin, Hae Jung Son International Journal of Surgery.2018; 60: 9. CrossRef
S3-Leitlinie: Kryptoglanduläre Analfisteln A. Ommer, A. Herold, E. Berg, S. Farke, A. Fürst, F. Hetzer, A. Köhler, S. Post, R. Ruppert, M. Sailer, T. Schiedeck, O. Schwandner, B. Strittmatter, B. H. Lenhard, W. Bader, S. Krege, H. Krammer, E. Stange coloproctology.2017; 39(1): 16. CrossRef
What happens after a failed LIFT for anal fistula? Moriah Wright, Alan Thorson, Garnet Blatchford, Maniamparampil Shashidharan, Jennifer Beaty, Noelle Bertelson, Piyush Aggrawal, Lindsay Taylor, Charles A. Ternent The American Journal of Surgery.2017; 214(6): 1210. CrossRef
Fistula tract curettage and the use of biological dermal plugs improve high transsphincteric fistula healing in an animal model Cigdem Benlice, Merve Yildiz, Semih Baghaki, Ilknur Erguner, Deniz Cebi Olgun, Sebnem Batur, Sibel Erdamar, Pinar Ambarcioglu, Ismail Hamzaoglu, Tayfun Karahasanoglu, Bilgi Baca International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2016; 31(2): 291. CrossRef
Management of complex anorectal fistulas with seton drainage plus partial fistulotomy and subsequent ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) B. Schulze, Y.-H. Ho Techniques in Coloproctology.2015; 19(2): 89. CrossRef
Long Head of Biceps Femoris Flap in Anal Fistula Treatment: Anatomical Study and Case Report F. X. Terryn, D. Leonard, F. Chateau Acta Chirurgica Belgica.2015; 115(2): 175. CrossRef
New Techniques in Anal Fistula Management Rasoul Azizi, Saman Mohammadipour Annals of Colorectal Research.2014;[Epub] CrossRef
Adipose-Derived Stem Cells in Tissue Regeneration: A Review Patricia Zuk ISRN Stem Cells.2013; 2013: 1. CrossRef
Fecal incontinence remains a socially isolating condition, which can have a profound impact on all aspects of quality of life. It affects 2% to 17% of people living in the community and is an iatrogenic disease that develops after a restorative proctectomy for rectal cancer. Conservative management, such as biofeedback and medication, or surgical therapy may be ineffective, the symptomatic benefit being disappointing. In a few recent reports, autologous myoblasts injected into the urinary or anal sphincter were used successfully for the treatment of incontinence, and these cells improved the muscle function. These autologous cell therapies can avoid adverse events, such as tumor formation, compared to the use of embryonic stem cells. However, the limited regenerative capacity of cell therapy has prompted the development of replacing dysfunctional muscle tissue.
Regenerative medicine for functioning muscles may be a therapeutic tool for fecal incontinence in the future. Now, many challenges remain to be overcome prior to reaching the ultimate goal of a fully functional 3-D vascularized engineered muscle: These include development of highly organized 3-D scaffolds, development of scaffolds that specifically direct cellular differentiation, development of co-culture systems of multiple cell types on smart surfaces, development of vascularized constructs, reduction of serum dependence, and innervation into constructed muscle. The successful generation of functional muscle tissues requires an in-depth knowledge of both muscle tissue physiology and advanced engineering practices. The recent advances in tissue engineering technique and cell biology suggest that artificially-derived muscle constructs may be used in clinical settings in the near future.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Feasibility of Neurovascular Antropylorus Perineal Transposition With Pudendal Nerve Anastomosis Following Anorectal Excision: A Cadaveric Study for Neoanal Reconstruction Abhijit Chandra, Ashok Kumar, M Noushif, Nitish Gupta, Vijay Kumar, Navneet Kumar Chauhan, Vishal Gupta Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(1): 7. CrossRef
Functional New Sphincter Ani Reconstruction by Using Neurovascualr Antropylorus Transposition After an Anorectal Excision Bong Hwa Lee, Min Jung Kim, Hyoung Chul Park Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(1): 5. CrossRef
Injection of porous polycaprolactone beads containing autologous myoblasts in a dog model of fecal incontinence Sung-Bum Kang, Hye Seung Lee, Jae-Young Lim, Se Heang Oh, Sang Joon Kim, Sa-Min Hong, Je-Ho Jang, Jeong-Eun Cho, Sung-Min Lee, Jin Ho Lee Journal of the Korean Surgical Society.2013; 84(4): 216. CrossRef
PURPOSE The fatigue rate index (FRI) has been developed to access sustained voluntary contraction of the external anal sphincter. This study is designed to refine the technical aspects of measuring the FRI and to re-evaluate its clinical significance. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with fecal incontinence (19 males, 19 females) and 37 (21 males, 16 females) controls were studied. Anal manometry was performed by using standard protocols. Fatigue was measured over a 20-sec squeeze at a high-pressure zone. The FRI was calculated from the maximum squeeze pressure (MXSP) and the fatigue rate. For the accuracy of the calculation, the mean resting pressure (MRP) was calibrated to zero before the metric procedure, representative segments of the calculation were selectively designated as those denoting sustained squeeze, and representative channels were designated from among 8 channels by using 3 or more of those showing typical sustaining-pressure curves. RESULTS: No difference in demographic factors was detected between the two groups.
Basic manometric parameters were significantly different between the two groups (MRP, 29.4+/-21.3 vs. 44.4+/-17.8 mmHg, P=0.0015; MXSP, 205.9+/-98.0 vs. 274.2+/-106.5 mmHg, P=0.0051). The FRI was also significantly different (29.8+/-14.3 vs. 86.3+/-127.1 sec, P=0.0108). The areas under the receptor operating-characteristic curves for the MRP, the MXSP, and the FRI were 0.72, 0.69, and 0.84, respectively. The sensitivity and the specificity of the FRI for detecting fecal incontinence were 80% and 65% at 40 sec as a cut-off point. CONCLUSION: The FRI was proven to be more accurate than the MRP and the MXSP in detecting incontinence. With adequate modifications of the measuring method, measurement of the FRI could be done more easily and conveniently, but its cut-off point for detecting fecal incontinence was lower than previously reported.
Increased fatigability of external anal sphincter in inflammatory bowel disease: Significance in fecal urgency and incontinence Athanasios A. Papathanasopoulos, Konstantinos H. Katsanos, Athina Tatsioni, Dimitrios K. Christodoulou, Epameinondas V. Tsianos Journal of Crohn's and Colitis.2010; 4(5): 553. CrossRef
Effects of Age and Sex on Anorectal Manometry Seung Chul Heo, Sung-Bum Kang, Kyu-Joo Park, Jae-Gahb Park Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2009; 25(5): 285. CrossRef
Many patients have functional disturbances after a traditional restorative rectal resection, complaining of urgency, frequent bowel movements, and occasional fecal incontinence. The rectal reservoir function is disturbed, and this is related to the size of the rectal remnant and the elastic properties of the neorectal wall. A straight anastomosis is recommended when the reservoir capacity of the rectal remnant is sufficient. A side-to-end anastomosis is probably preferable to an end-to-end anastomosis. If a straight anastomosis is considered, the descending colon is much better than the sigmoid colon. If optimal functional results are to be obtained soon after surgery, construction of a pouch is recommended when the rectal remnant is very short. There seems to be a balance between continence without urgency and evacuation ability. For patients with weak sphincter muscles and habitually loose feces, the surgeon should tailor the length of the pouch to be longer whereas it should be made smaller for patients with a pre-operative tendency toward constipation. In the long-term, bowel adaptation may also enable the function after a straight anastomosis to approximate that of a colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis. Where the pelvis is too narrow for a bulky colonic J-pouch anal anastomosis, a coloplasty-anal- anastomosis is an option. The latter results in postoperative bowel function comparable with that of the colonic J-pouch. Traditionally, poor bowel function has been managed expectantly. The colonic adaptation may take one or two years to occur after a low anterior resection. The patient is advised to take adequate soluble fiber in the diet and to avoid foods which aggravate the bowel dysfunction. Those with increased stool frequency are prescribed constipating agents to help control the symptoms.
Patients with rectal evacuation problems are prescribed regular laxatives and enemas.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Quality of Life in Colorectal Cancer Patients according to the Severity of Symptom Clusters Classification Gyeonghui Jeong, Kyunghee Kim, Yeunhee Kwak Asian Oncology Nursing.2014; 14(2): 74. CrossRef
Fecal incontinence is a common problem that is underreported, underdiagnosed and poorly managed. It profoundly affects the quality of life and psychological function. It is widely known that the diversity of causes of fecal incontinence and different modes of action of various treatment modalities mandates a tailored approach in each case. Currently, several diagnostic tests are available that can provide useful insights regarding the pathophysiology of fecal incontinence, and also several advanced treatment modalities which make it possible to rehabilitate most of these patients become recently available. Strictly speaking, however, no specific test can tell the exact etiology of fecal incontinence and the modes of action in various treatment modalities are still not well-defined. In this sense, policy of approach to patients with fecal incontinence can rather be straightforward. Patients with endosonographically proven sphincteric defect should be treated with sphincteroplasty. But for patients without such defect, less invasive procedures among recently available modalities should be the first consideration and then more invasive ones next in case of failure.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Evaluation of Anal Continence Function by Advanced Anal Manometric Parameters Moo-Kyung Seong, Keun-Young Kim, Young-Bum Yoo Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2009; 25(1): 20. CrossRef
Pelvic floor disorders are of interest to many surgeons who specialize in organ systems within this region. Colorectal surgeons are especially interested in disorders of the posterior compartment, which may broadly be divided into defecation disorders and fecal incontinence. These disorders distress patients socially and psychologically and greatly impair their quality of life. The underlying anatomical and pathophysiological changes are complex, are often incompletely understood, and cannot always be determined.
However, over the past decades, advances in the understanding of these disorders, together with rational methods of evaluation in anorectal physiology laboratories, radiology studies, and new surgical techniques, have led to promising results. This review summarizes the evaluation and treatment strategies, as well as the recent updates on the clinical and the therapeutic aspects of pelvic floor disorders.
PURPOSE The rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) aids the anal continence function by a sampling process. On the other hand, it might impair the anal continence function because the internal anal sphincter is relaxed during the reflex. We assessed the parameters of RAIR in incontinent patients with or without a sphincter defect and compared them with healthy control subjects to clarify the exact role of that reflex in the anal continence function. METHODS The recovery time, slope, amplitude, and area under the reflex curve of the RAIR were measured for 31 normal controls without any history of anorectal surgery (group A), 32 incontinent patients with a sphincter defect (group B), and 49 incontinent patients without a sphincter defect (group C). Incontinence was defined as bowel accidents of more than 3 by the Cleveland Clinic Florida score. A sphincteric defect was defined endoanal sonographically. The mean ages of group A, B, and C were 57.9+/-14.3, 54.5+/-13.6, and 61.8+/-15.4 years, respectively. RESULTS When group A and group B+C were compared, the recovery times (seconds) were 17.5+/-3.5 and 14.8+/-5.5 (P=.003), the slopes (mmHg/second) were 0.67+/-3.04 and 3.27+/-2.44 (P<.001), the amplitudes (%) were 7.0+/-16.5 and 53.3+/-19.4 (P=.352), and the area under the reflex curve (mmHg*seconds) were 230.2+/-102.15 and 173.0+/-140.8 (P=.020). When group B and group C were compared, the recovery times were 15.0+/-5.8 and 14.7+/-5.3 (P=.828), the slopes were 3.6+/-2.8 and 3.1+/-2.2 (P= .388), the amplitudes were 54.2+/-22.4 and 52.7+/-17.4 (P=.737), and the area under the reflex curve were 188.0+/-151.1 and 163.2+/-134.3 (P=.443). All parameters of the RAIR, except the amplitude were significantly diminished in incontinent patients whether they had a sphincter defect or not.
CONSLUSIONS: Although the RAIR functions against continence in normal conditions by inhibiting sphincteric tone, it behaves suitably for keeping continence in the presence of incontinence, whatever the cause is, by attenuating the degree of inhibition.
Treatment of fecal incontinence still remains a challenge to modern medicine due to many specific sides of this problem.
The diversity of causes of fecal incontinence and different modes of action of the various treatment modalities mandate a tailored, individualized approach in each case. Surgery is the last treatment modality for patients suffering from severe fecal incontinence. Recent studies have shown poor late results after primary sphincter repair and low predictive value for most preoperative diagnostic tests. New surgical options such as artificial devices and electrically stimulated muscle transpositions are reported by acceptable success rates and unacceptably frequent complications. That is why current attention has focused on non- or minimally invasive therapies such as sacral nerve stimulation and temperature-controlled radio-frequency energy delivery to the anal canal. However, all these innovative techniques remain experimental untill enough high- evidence data are gathered for their objective evaluation.
PURPOSE We designed this study to evaluate efficacy of sphincter repair and factors influencing in patients with postobstetric fecal incontinence. METHODS Twenty-one patients (mean age 42 years; range 23~67) undergoing sphincter repair for postobstetric fecal incontinence (mean duration 12 years; range 6 months~46 years) were evaluated prospectively. Preoperatively, standardized interviews, anorectal manometry and measurement of pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) were performed. Incontinence was graded according to the Parks' classification: Grade 1 - continence to stool and flatus; Grade 2 - incontinent to flatus, some urgency to stool present but no incontinence; Grade 3 - incontinent to liquid stool; Grade 4 - incontinent to formed stool. Sphincter repair methods were overlap repair of external anal sphincter (EAS) in 4 patients, overlap repair of EAS with anterior levatorplasty in 15 patients, and overlap repair of EAS with anterior levatorplasty and postanal repair in 2 patients. Anorectal manometry at 3 months, and interviews at 3 months and 6 months after sphincter repair were performed again. Patients' satisfaction was classified as excellent, good, fair, and no improvement. RESULTS Difficulty in first delivery was noticed in 18 patients and history of previous sphincter repair was noticed in 5 patients. Preoperatively, most patients showed high grade incontinence (grade 3 in 13 and grade 4 in 8 patients). After sphincter repair, 18 patients (85.7%) became grade 1 or 2, and 16 patients (76.2%) replied their functional satisfaction excellent or good. There were no difference between the results at 3 months and 6 months.
Poor functional outcome was in 2 of 3 patients with bilaterally prolonged preoperative PNTML. Short duration of incontinence and young age at the time of repair favored good results. Previous sphincter repair did not influence the outcome. Postoperatively both anal pressure and high pressure zone length were significantly increased in patients with improved continence Postoperative complications were wound infection in 2 patients and necrosis at the apex of the advancement skin flap in 1 case but these did not influence the outcome. CONCLUSIONS Most postobstetric fecal incontinence can be successfully treated with sphincter repair. Excellent results are expected when the duration of incontinence is short and the patients are young. Pudendal neuropathy seemed to be related to poor outcome.
Fecal incontinence is a common disorder, affecting all ages and both sexes. It is a devastating condition and has a major impact on quality of life. The level of treatment must be appropriate for the severity of symptoms. Nonsurgical techniques are appropriate for patients with minor degrees of incontinence. Patients with sphincter disruption or rectal prolapse can benefit from the appropriate surgical therapy. Patients with intractable, clinically significant fecal incontinence, caused by trauma or the failure of surgical therapy, need salvage options. In the past if a patient was not amenable to a tissue repair or failed a tissue repair, a colostomy was his or her only surgical option. However, new innovations can give patients more options to regain continence. The artificial bowel sphincter (ABS) is one of those newer options. It is an implantable device used to treat the patients with severe fecal incontinence, who have failed, or are not candidates for less invasive forms of restorative therapy. It is intended to mimic the natural process of bowel control. This device is reserved for patients with severe fecal incontinence that is not amenable to lesser forms of therapy. Because it is an artificial device, ABS is unfortunately associated with high morbidity and low success rate. With experience, however, the infection rate has declined due to new standardized prophylactic antibiotics regimen. Therefore, the ABS has become a good option for patients with severe fecal incontinence. The results are quite impressive with a significant number of patients obtaining complete continence. This review presents the technique of ABS implantation and the current status of ABS.
PURPOSE To assess the outcome of complete anatomical repair (sphincteroplasty, rectal wall plication, rectovaginal septum plication, perineal body repair, levatoroplasty) and to identify the preoperative factors influencing the outcome for the perineal obstetric injury. METHODS Eighteen, consecutive female patients who had undergone complete anatomical repair with chronic fecal incontinence due to perineal injury during 13 months were evaluated. Mean age was 48.9+/-10.1 years, mean duration of symptom was 18.9 (range: 1-33) years, mean delivery numbers were 2.8 +/-1.2 times, and mean follow up was 11.9 +/- 4.7 months. The predictive factors were age, manometry, PNTML (pudendal nerve terminal motor latency), rectal sensation, RAIR (rectoanal inhibitory reflex), duration of symptom, angle of sphincter defect, vaginal delivery numbers, hospital stay, follow-up period, wound healing period, and Wexner's incontinence score. RESULTS The anatomical success rate via endoanal ultrasonography was 100%, complication rate was 5.5%, and functional success rate (Wexners' score < or =5) was 88.9%.
The patients showed lower maximal resting pressure, maximal squeezing pressure, maximal voluntary contraction, mean resting pressure, mean squeezing pressure, and maximal tolerable volume than the normal control group (p<0.05). The median incontinence score was significantly decreased after surgery (pre op=12.2 vs post op=2.9) (p<0.05). Among the preoperative predictive factors, the incontinence score correlated significantly with postoperative functional success (r=0.552, P=0.017). CONCLUSIONS Complete anatomical repair showed an excellent anatomical result and a good functional outcome. Patient with high preoperative incontinence score had a tendency for postoperative residual incontinence.
PURPOSE Fatigue rate index (FRI) is one of relatively unknown parameters of anal manometry. It was devised to assess sustained voluntary contractibility of external anal sphincter muscle. We designed this study to determine the predictability of FRI in evaluating patients with symptoms of fecal incontinence. METHODS Consecutive male patients with fecal incontinence, those with prolapsed hemorrhoids but without any kind of incontinence symptom, and male healthy volunteers who have no anal symptom were grouped as A, B, C. Anal manometric parameters including FRI were measured and compared statistically among them. RESULTS All subjects were 84. Group A 27, Group B 33, and Group C 24. Their ages were 33.33+/-2.91 (mean SE), 39.27+/-2.80, and 50.81+/-4.33, respectively. Mean resting pressures (mmHg) were 78.11 6.56 for group A, 81.18+/-7.19 for group B, and 57.81+/-7.80 for group C. Maximum resting pressures (mmHg) were 98.67+/-9.69, 100.82+/-8.49, 78.13+/-10.26. Mean squeeze pressures (mmHg) were 229.11+/-18.72, 248.18+/-23.03, 156.94+/-17.89. Maximum squeeze pressures (mmHg) were 286.50+/-33.76, 298.59+/-27.83, 187.38+/-21.08. Resting radial asymmetries (%) were 18.85+/-2.81, 19.85+/-2.31, 28.70+/-4.79. Squeeze radial asymmetries were 15.73+/-2.90, 16.29+/-1.96, 16.47+/-2.95. Fatigue rates were 0.90+/-0.21, 1.17+/-0.15, 1.38+/-0.40. Fatigue rate indices (min.) were 3.76+/-0.41, 2.63+/-0.20, 1.94+/-0.26, respectively. Differences between group A and group C were statistically significant in mean squeeze pressure (P=0.0093), maximum squeeze pressure (P= 0.0190) and FRI (P=0.0008). Those between group B and group C were significant also in mean squeeze pressure (P=0.005), maximum squeeze pressure (P=0.0051), and FRI (P=0.0396).
Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that independently significant parameters were age (P= 0.002) and FRI (P=0.007). Cut-off point of FRI for incontinence with maximum sensitivity and specificity was 2.4min. by ROC (receiver operating characteristics) analysis. CONCLUSION FRI is a meaningful parameter in predicting fecal incontinence, which can be used in assessment of sphincter function and future treatment protocols.
PURPOSE The aim of our study was to evaluate the physiological spectrum of anorectal dysfunction among patients with full thickness circunferential rectal prolapse.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between January 1988 and March 1995, 88 patients who visited department colorectal surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida with rectal prolapse were studied.
There were 8 males and 80 females, with a mean age 69 (range 28~101) years. Patients underwent a detailed history and the following anorectal physiology tests were performed: anal canal manometry, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) assessment, anal electromyography and cinedefecography.4 standard continence scoring system, based on the frequency and type of incontinence (0=full continence, 20=complete incontinence) was used. Patients with rectal prolapse (n=88) were divided into two subgroups: Group I=continent patients (n=33) and Group II= incontinent patients (n=55). RESULTS There were statistically significant differences between each group when comparing mean resting pressures, anal pressures, anal canal length, rectal compliance, rectoanal inhibitory reflex, increased fiber density, the occurrence of premature evacuation (p<0.001), and rectal capacity (p<0.05). However, dynamic changes of anorectal angle, resting anorectal angle, puborectalis length, and rectal sensitivity were not significantly different (p>0.05) between groups. CONCLUSION Continence may be disturbed in patients with rectal prolapse; knowledge of impairment in continence may assist in surgical management.
Many different kinds of anorectal physiologic studies were performed for the evaluation of defecation disorders. Some of these studies are anorectal manometry and pudendal nerve conduction study. In pudendal nerve conduction study, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML) was considered to be very useful for the evaluation and management of these patients. However, evaluation of amplitude in pudendal nerve conduction study has been clinically seldom used. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical significane of amplitude in pudendal nerve conduction study in patients with defecation disorders by comparing to manometric profiles.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between February, 1997 and February, 1998 all patients who underwent pudendal nerve conduction study and anorectal manometry for the evaluation of defecation disorders (constipation and fecalincontinence) were analyzed. Latency as well as amplitude in pudendal nerve conduction study were compared in both groups to the pressure profiles in manometric study according to the subgroups of these patients. Statistical analysis were performed by a Chi-square or Student's t-test and significance was assumed when p<0.05. RESULTS A total of 80 patients, forty constipation with a mean age of 55.3+/-14.5 (GI: range; 24~86) years and forty fecal incontinence with a mean age of 61.1+/-10.3 (GII: range; 37~74) years and a male to female ratio of 25:15 (GI), 28:12 (GII), were studied. PNTML in both sides in GI were significantly decreased in comparision to those of GII (GI: Rt, 2.17+/-0.7 ms Lt, 2.03+/-0.5 ms, GII: Rt, 2.50+/-0.7 ms, Lt 2.64+/-0.8 ms, p<0.05), However, there were no differences between the two groups in terms of amplitudes (GI: Rt 399.0+/-348 uV, Lt 426.8+/-403 uV, GII: Rt, 406.9+/-273 uV Lt, 392.9+/-291 uV, NS) in pudendal nerve conduction study. In manometric findings, even though maximal resting, mean, minimum and maximal pushing pressures were no differences in both groups, mean resting and maximal squeezing pressure were significantly increased in GI than those of GII (GI: 82.4+/-31 cmH20, GII: 60.5+/-25 cmH20 in mean resting pressure, GI: 213.1+/-108 cmH20, GII: 178.7+/-66 cmH20 in maximal squeezing pressure, p<0.05) When we analyzed the overall values of amplitudes according to the diagnosis, age, gender, and the value of PNTML, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. But, when the one side of PNTML shorter than the other side, it tended to have a high amplitude in that side than that of the other side in the same patient (the probability for trend was 74%). CONCLUSION Constipation patient has a shorter PNTML, higher mean resting, and maximal squeezing pressure than fecal incontinene patient. The amplitude in pudendal nerve conduction study had a trend of inverse correlation to the latency in the same patient. Therefore, amplitude in pudendal nerve conduction study might be useful to monitor or predict the outcome after treatment in patients with defecation disorders.
PURPOSE This study was designed to evaluate the outcome of anterior sphincter repair and factors influencing the outcome in patients with obstetric fecal incontinence. METHODS Thirty-three patients undergoing sphincter repair for obstetric fecal incontinence were prospectively evaluated. Preoperatively, standardized interviews and physiologic studies were performed. The severity of incontinence was graded according to the Parks' classification. Patients' satisfaction was classified as excellent, good, fair, and no improvement. An anterior overlapping sphincteroplasty was performed with or without levatorplasty. Interviews and manometry were repeated three months after the operation. Four years after the operation, the severities of incontinence and patients' satisfaction were reevaluated. RESULTS Preoperatively, all patients showed high-grade incontinence (grade 3 or 4). Three months after the operation, 28 patients (84.8%) had successfully recovered continence (incontinence grade 1 or 2), and 25 of those patients (75.8%) replied with satisfaction (excellent or good). The maximal average squeeze pressure (MASP) and the high-pressure zone (HPZ) length, but not the maximal average resting pressure (MARP), had significantly increased in patients with successfully recovered continence. At the 4-year follow ups, the outcomes were significantly worse than thase at 3 months, but 24 patients (72.7%) still maintained good outcome, and 25 patients (66.7%) still replied with satisfaction that was not significantly worse than that at 3 months. Patients with a young age (<45 years), a shorter duration of incontinence (<10 years), a larger increase in MASP or MASP at 3 months after the operation, no pudendal neuropathy, and a good result at 3 months were more likely to maintain low-grade incontinence.
The addition of levatorplasty and an increase in the HPZ length at 3 months did not affect the outcome. CONCLUSIONS At the 4-year follow-ups, the outcomes had significantly deteriorated, but patients' satisfaction had not. Age, the duration of incontinence, a postoperative increment in MASP or MASP, pudendal neuropathy, and a short-term good outcome were closely related to the long-term outcome.
PURPOSE This study was designed to analyze the short-term clinical and functional outcomes of perineal rectosigmoidectomy with levatoroplasty for complete rectal prolapse. METHODS The data were prospectively collected and consisted of the clinical data, the functional status before and after surgery, the operation record, and the postoperative course.
The functional status was evaluated by using Wexner's constipation score (0-30), Wexner's incontinence score (0-20), anorectal manometry, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency. Follow-up was performed at 3-6 months after the operation by using both a standardized questionnaire completed in the outpatient clinic or telephone interview (n=23) and an anorectal physiology test (n=7). RESULTS During a one-year period, 23 patients (male=10) underwent perineal rectosigmoidectomy with levatoroplasty for complete rectal prolapse. The median duration of the operations was 88 minutes. The median length of postoperative hospital stay was 6 days. There was one urinary tract infection and no mortalities. The constipation score was significantly decreased after the operation (9.8 vs 3.8; P<0.001), and constipation was improved in 90 percent (19/21) of the cases. The incontinence score was significantly decreased after surgery (mean preop.=11.6, postop.=3.7; P<0.001) and incontinence was improved in 17 of 21 patients with impaired continence (81 percent). Anal sphincter function was not improved but rectal reservoir capacity was significantly decreased after surgery (rectal urgent volume (45.7 cc vs 37.1 cc; P=0.045), maximal tolerable volume (120 cc vs 85.7; P=0.011). Most patients (83 percent) felt that the operation had improved their symptoms. The major reasons for dissatisfaction after surgery were frequent defecation, fecal soiling, persistent or aggravated fecal incontinence, and recurrence. One patient had a complete recurrence (4.3 percent), and another patient had a mucosal prolapse which was treated. CONCLUSIONS Perineal rectosigmoidectomy with levatoroplasty for complete rectal prolapse is a safe technique with acceptable short-term functional results; however, it is not recommended for rectal prolapse patients with diarrhea-predominant irritable bowel syndrome.
Park, In Ja , Yu, Chang Sik , Kim, Hee Cheol , Jung, Young Hak , Han, Kyong Rok , Park, Sang Kyu , Kim, Jung Rang , Song, Jin Sook , Lee, Hyang Ran , Kim, Jin Cheon
PURPOSE We aimed to assess the efficacy of biofeedback therapy for patients with fecal incontinence (FI) according to the etiology. METHODS Twenty-nine patients with fecal incontinence were treated with biofeedback therapy using a EMG-based system.
The efficacy was assessed by using changes in the FI score (Cleveland Clinic, Florida: 0~20) and satisfaction based on a subjective evaluation score from 0 to 100. The median follow up duration was 12 (3~25) months. RESULTS Ten patients had idiopathic fecal incontinence.
Fourteen patients had fecal incontinence due to a sphincter saving operation for rectal cancer. Four cases had spinal cord injury and one patient had a major external sphincter tearing due to trauma. The mean age was 52 (16~78) years.
The median number of biofeedback sessions was 10 (3~15) overall. The mean efficacy was 42.8%, and the mean satisfaction score was 56.6. Improvements in the FI score and in the patients' satisfaction varied according to the etiology, 69.5% and 71.5 in the idiopathic group, 28.5% and 49.3 in the postoperative group, and 35% and 24 in the spinal cord injury group. In the idiopathic group, 50% of the patients showed an improvement in the FI score of more than 75%, and 90% of the patients showed an improvement of more than 50%. The number of liquid incontinence episodes was improved 78.3% later in the biofeedback group, and this result was much better than in the postoperative incontinence group (31.8%, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS The success rate of the biofeedback therapy for fecal incontinence is acceptable. Subjective satisfaction is relatively higher than the improvement in the ecal incontinence score. Idiopathic fecal incontinence may be the best indication for biofeedback therapy.
We performed this study to investigate defecographic findings in patients with fecal incontinence and to compare these findings with age-matched asymptomatic controls.
Twenty patients with fecal incontinence and 20 asymptomatic subjects were included. Videodefecography and pelvic electrophysiologic test were performed. There were no significant differences on the presence of rectal wall changes such as rectocele, mucosal prolapse, or incomplete evacuation, but intussusception was more common in patients group. The anorectal angle were 112.8+/-16.2degrees, 93.0+/-15.0degrees, 118.8+/-16.3degrees at resting, squeezing, and straining, respectively in controls, whereas 121.5+/-20.8degrees, 110.8+/-22.2degrees, 132.0+/-21.1degrees, respectively in patients group. There were significant differences of anorectal angle at squeezing and straining in patients group compared with controls(p< 0.05). Perineal descent was significantly decreased at squeezing in patients group compared with controls(p<0.05).
Anal canal width was signi(icantly widened in patients group compared with controls(p<0.05). There were no differences in various defecographic parameters depending on the presence of pudendal neuropathy. In conclusion, defecographic findings in fecal incontinence showed more obtuse anorectal angle, poorer perineal descent at squeezing, and widening of anal canal.
Many kinds of different treatment options for fecal incontinence such as biofeedback therapy, anterior or posterior sphincteroplasty, pelvic floor repair, gracilis or gluteus muscle transposition have been introduced. However, appropriate indications for these treatment options have not yet been delineated up to now.
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to access the preoperative severity of fecal incontinence by physiologic tests to give an idea that indications of appropriate selection criteria and parameters for assess the outcome could be simultaneously considered by preoperatively objective physiologic data.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 3, 1997 to, August 1, 1997 all patients with fecal incontinence who visited colorectal clinic in the Department of Surgery, Korea Veterans Hospital, were classified into two groups according to the severity of fecal incontinence (0~20): Group I (1~9), Group II (10~20) and compared them with the results of physiologic tests: anorectal manometry, endorectal ultrasound (ERU), cinedefecography, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML). Statistical analysis was performed by Student's-t test, and Chi-square test and p<0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS The number of GI was 25, and GII was 22. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of age (GI: 57.7+/-14.5, GII: 61.4+/-14.0years), gender (male: female, 19:6, 16:6), cause (neurogenic; 11/25 (GI),7/22(GII), postanal surgery; 6/25,6/22) obstetric trauma (2/25, 2/22), anal trauma (1/25, 1/22) diabetes melitus (1/25, 2/22), rectal prolapse (2/25, 1/22), and others (2/25, 3/22), duration of fecal incontinence (64.4+/-82.2, 48.7+/-65.3 months), high pressure zone (3.3+/-1.7, 3.5+/-1.4 cm), mean resting pressure (50.5+/-27.0, 51.9+/-18.7 cm H2O), maximal resting pressure (88.4+/-50.6, 89.4+/-41.8 cm), maximal squeezing pressure (150.6+/-71.0, 129.7+/-59.5 cm H2O), rectoanal inhibitatory reflex (13/21, 8/21 positive), sensitivity (37.5+/-15.2, 41.8+/-29.0 cc), compliance (19.0+/-14.5, 21.4+/-39.4 cc/cm H2O) in anorectal manometric findings, anal sphincter defect (13/21, 15/22 positive), size of defect (60+/-26.30degrees, 71 +/-30.8degrees/360degrees), thickness of the external anal sphincter (3.46+/-0.78, 3.84 +/-1.02 cm), thickness of internal anal sphincter (1.58+/-0.79, 1.74+/-0.81 cm) in ERU, anorectal angle in rest (85.2+/-28.0degrees, 97+/-22.9degrees), squeeze (72+/-27.1degrees, 82 +/-19.7degrees), push (100+/-43.9degrees, 117.9+/-34.5degrees), length of perineal descent in rest (3.7+/-1.2, 3.6+/-1.7 cm), squeeze (2.9+/-1.5, 2.7+/-1.5 cm), push (7.9+/-3.5, 6.6+/-2.6 cm) in cinedefecography.
However, rectal capacity in manometry (212.5+/-99.9, 155+/-51.5 cc, p<0.05), right PNTML (1.73+/-0.39, 2.71+/-0.83 ms, p<0.001), and left PNTML (1.83+/-0.43, 2.94+/-0.80 ms, p<0.001) were significantly increased in GII compare to those of GI. CONCLUSION As the severity of fecal incontinence was increased, rectal capacity, right and, left PNTML were increased.
PURPOSE This study was undertaken to identify factors influencing fecal incontinence in rectal prolapse. METHODS The clinical and anorectal physiologic data (anal manometry, rectal sensitivity test, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML)) of 42 complete rectal prolapse patients were collected in a prospective database and were analyzed according to Wexner's incontinence score (0-20). RESULTS The mean Wexner's incontinence score was 10.6.
Females (n=24) were more prone to be incontinent than males (n=18)(incontinence score 14.8 vs 5.1, p<0.001). A linear regression analysis showed that increased age (r= 0.497, p=0.001), decreased maximum resting pressure (MRP) (r= 0.686, p<0.001), decreased maximum squeezing pressure (MSP)(r= 0.789, p<0.001), decreased maximal rectal tolerable volume (MTV) (r= 0.386, p=0.012) influenced the incontinence score. An absent rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR) was not related to incontinence, but was related to significantly low resting anal pressure. Delayed PNTML did not influence incontinence or the MSP. In a multiple regression analysis, decreased MRP (beta= 0.383; p=0.002), decreased MSP (beta= 0.345; p =0.007) and female gender (beta=0.343; p=0.006) influenced incontinence significantly. CONCLUSIONS Major factors influencing fecal incontinence in complete rectal prolapse were decreased MRP and MSP. Female patients were more prone to fecal incontinence than males.
RAIR and MTV were not significant factors. PNTML did not show any relation to incontinence score or the anal pressure.
Anal incontinence following pelvic trauma, surgery or neurologic disorder has significant medical and social implications. When no known functioning sphincter muscles are present, surgical correction of this distressing condition other than by stomal fecal diversion is aimed at recreating a sphincter mechanism under voluntary control.
The use of the gluteus maximus encircling the neorectum with a contractile muscualr ring provides an active control of continence and reserves the anorectal angulation. The sacrifice of the entire gluteus maximum muscle in an ambulatory patient will cause difficulty in climbing stairs; however, the use of the anatomically dissected lower half will preserve its function. With careful dissection, the lower half of the g1uteus maximus muscle together with its neurovascular supply can be developed for anal sphincter reconstruction. Three Patient, (two men and one woman) underwent g1uteus maximus transposition for complete anal incontinence. The indication for operation were sphincter destruction secondary to extensive soft tissue necrosis on perianal, perineal and buttock area due to necrotizing fascitis(n=2), and soft tissue defect on perianal, buttock area due to trauma(n=1). The procedure is performed with the use of a diverting colostomy. The inferior portion of the origin of each gluteus maximus is detached from the sacrum and coccyx, bifurcated,and tunneled subcutaneously to encircle the anus. The ends were sutured together to form two opposing slings of voluntary muscles. Postoperatively two patient regained continence to solid stool, one to liquid stool as well. The technique of constructing sphincter is simple and utilizes principles of muscle tendon transfer without jeopardizing function of gait. Furthermore the gluteus maximus muscle, being an accessory muscle of anal continence, is an ideal structure for this reconstruction.
Yoon, Seo Gue , Lee, Kwang Real , Cho, Kyung A , Hwang, Do Yean , Kim, Khun Uk , Kang, Young Won , Park, Weon Kap , Kim, Hyun Sik , Lee, Jung Kyun , Kim, Kwang Yun
This study compares the sexual differences among rectal prolapse patients regarding the clinical and the physiologic characteristics with emphasis on males. METHODS The clinical data, functional status and operative records of 43 patients, who had completed both clinical and functional evaluations were collected in a prospective database and were analyzed according to sex. The functional status of the patients was evaluated by Wexner's constipation score (0~30), Wexner's incontinence score (0~20), anorectal manometry, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (PNTML). RESULTS The incidences of rectal prolapse in males (n=22) and in females (n=21) were similar. The age of onset for males was lower (mean standard deviation, 19.6 19.59 (50% in childhood) vs 52.0 20.75 years; p=0.001) and the duration of symptoms was longer (31.5+/-19.87 vs 12.5+/-14.31 years; p<0.001). Surgery in males was most commonly performed during the sexually active years (51.2+/-16.34 vs 64.5+/-13.19; p=0.006). The incidence of mucosal prolapse in males was higher (10/22 vs 4/17; p=0.065). The incidences and the severities of defecation difficulty in males and females were similar (n=12, mean Wexner score=8.4 vs n=12, mean Wexner score=9.9; p=NS) but, the incidences and the severities of fecal incontinence were lower in males (n=4, mean Wexner score=4.3 vs n=17, mean Wexner score= 14.2; p<0.001). The maximum resting pressure was higher in males (39.2+/-21.46 vs 26.3+/-19.98 mmHg; p=0.049), and the maximum squeezing pressure was better preserved (131.2+/-62.63 vs 67.5+/-37.99 mmHg; p<0.001). No significant difference existed in the PNTML. Female patients underwent abdominal resection rectopexy (n=6), perineal rectosigmoidectomy with lavatoroplasty (n=11), and Delorme's procedure (n=4), but all male patients preferred the perineal approach (rectosigmoidectomy with lavatoroplasty (n=8), Delorme's procedure (n=14)) for fear of sexual dysfunction after the abdominal approach. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest that the mechanism for developing rectal prolapse in male and female may be different and that surgical treatment should be tailored to the patient.