Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
8 "Hemorrhoidopexy"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Display
Original Article
Anorectal benign disease
A comparative study on efficacy and safety of modified partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Tae Gyu Kim, Chul Seung Lee, Dong Geun Lee, Choon Sik Chung, Seung Han Kim, Sang Hwa Yu, Jeong Eun Lee, Gwan Cheol Lee, Dong Woo Kang, Jeong Sub Kim, Gyu Young Jeong
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(2):145-153.   Published online April 28, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00535.0076
  • 3,910 View
  • 115 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
The long-term outcomes and efficacy of partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy (PSH) compared with those of conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH) are not fully understood. This study aimed to introduce a modified PSH (mPSH) and compare its clinical efficacy and safety with those of CH.
Methods
A prospective randomized controlled trial was conducted. This study was performed at a single hospital and involved 6 colorectal surgeons. In total, 110 patients were enrolled between July 2019 and September 2020. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either mPSH group (n=55) or CH group (n=55). The primary outcome was to compare postoperative average pain and postoperative peak pain using visual analog scale score between the 2 groups.
Results
The required duration of analgesia was shorter in the mPSH group than in the CH group, although the difference was not statistically significant (P=0.096). However, the laxative requirement duration (P<0.010), return to work (P<0.010), satisfaction score (P<0.010), and Vaizey score (P=0.014) were significantly better in the mPSH group. The average and peak postoperative pain scores were significantly lower in the mPSH group during the 15 days after surgery (P<0.001). The overall complication rate in both groups was 9.1%, with no significant difference between the groups (P=0.867).
Conclusion
The mPSH group demonstrated better improvement in symptoms, lower pain scores, and greater patient early satisfaction after surgery than the CH group. Therefore, this surgical technique appears to be a safe and effective alternative for CH.
Guideline
Anorectal benign disease
The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of acute and chronic hemorrhoidal disease
Antonio Brillantino, Adolfo Renzi, Pasquale Talento, Luigi Brusciano, Luigi Marano, Maurizio Grillo, Mauro Natale Maglio, Fabrizio Foroni, Alessio Palumbo, Maria Laura Sandoval Sotelo, Luciano Vicenzo, Michele Lanza, Giovanna Frezza, Massimo Antropoli, Claudio Gambardella, Luigi Monaco, Ilaria Ferrante, Domenico Izzo, Alfredo Giordano, Michele Pinto, Corrado Fantini, Marcello Gasparrini, Michele Schiano Di Visconte, Francesca Milazzo, Giovanni Ferreri, Andrea Braini, Umberto Cocozza, Massimo Pezzatini, Valeria Gianfreda, Alberto Di Leo, Vincenzo Landolfi, Umberto Favetta, Sergio Agradi, Giovanni Marino, Massimiliano Varriale, Massimo Mongardini, Claudio Eduardo Fernando Antonio Pagano, Riccardo Brachet Contul, Nando Gallese, Giampiero Ucchino, Michele D’Ambra, Roberto Rizzato, Giacomo Sarzo, Bruno Masci, Francesca Da Pozzo, Simona Ascanelli, Patrizia Liguori, Angela Pezzolla, Francesca Iacobellis, Erika Boriani, Eugenio Cudazzo, Francesca Babic, Carmelo Geremia, Alessandro Bussotti, Mario Cicconi, Antonia Di Sarno, Federico Maria Mongardini, Antonio Brescia, Leonardo Lenisa, Massimiliano Mistrangelo, Matteo Zuin, Marta Mozzon, Alessandro Paolo Chiriatti, Vincenzo Bottino, Antonio Ferronetti, Corrado Rispoli, Ludovico Carbone, Giuseppe Calabrò, Antonino Tirrò, Domenico de Vito, Giovanna Ioia, Giovanni Luca Lamanna, Lorenzo Asciore, Ettore Greco, Pierluigi Bianchi, Giuseppe D’Oriano, Alessandro Stazi, Nicola Antonacci, Raffaella Marina Di Renzo, Gianmario Edoardo Poto, Giuseppe Paolo Ferulano, Antonio Longo, Ludovico Docimo
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):287-320.   Published online August 30, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00871.0124
  • 17,044 View
  • 517 Download
  • 14 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia, SIUCP) on the diagnosis and management of hemorrhoidal disease, with the goal of guiding physicians in the choice of the best treatment option. A panel of experts was charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key questions on the main topics related to the management of hemorrhoidal disease and to perform an accurate and comprehensive literature search on each topic, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in multiple rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to PICO (patients, intervention, comparison, and outcomes) criteria, and the statements were developed adopting the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations) methodology. In cases of grade 1 hemorrhoidal prolapse, outpatient procedures including hemorrhoidal laser procedure and sclerotherapy may be considered the preferred surgical options. For grade 2 prolapse, nonexcisional procedures including outpatient treatments, hemorrhoidal artery ligation and mucopexy, laser hemorrhoidoplasty, the Rafaelo procedure, and stapled hemorrhoidopexy may represent the first-line treatment options, whereas excisional surgery may be considered in selected cases. In cases of grades 3 and 4, stapled hemorrhoidopexy and hemorrhoidectomy may represent the most effective procedures, even if, in the expert panel opinion, stapled hemorrhoidopexy represents the gold-standard treatment for grade 3 hemorrhoidal prolapse.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical evidence and rationale of topical nifedipine and lidocaine ointment in the treatment of anal fissure and hemorrhoidal disease
    Gaetano GALLO, Mario TROMPETTO
    Minerva Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy combined with rubber band ligation and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for the management of grade III/IV hemorrhoids: a retrospective study
    Qing Long, Yong Wen, Jun Li
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Critical appraisal of transperineal Doppler ultrasound as a diagnostic tool for hemorrhoidal recurrence
    Michele Schiano di Visconte
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Operative versus nonoperative treatment of thrombosed external hemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Marcelo Albuquerque Barbosa Martins, Luiz Felipe Costa de Almeida, Anelise Poluboiarinov Cappellaro, Luís Fernando Rosati Rocha, Rachid Eduardo Noleto da Nobrega Oliveira
    Updates in Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Validation of a novel imaging-guided and anatomy-based classification system for anorectal fistulas: a retrospective clinical evaluation study
    Antonio Brillantino, Francesca Iacobellis, Luigi Marano, Adolfo Renzi, Pasquale Talento, Luigi Brusciano, Claudio Gambardella, Umberto Favetta, Michele Schiano Di Visconte, Luigi Monaco, Maurizio Grillo, Mauro Natale Maglio, Fabrizio Foroni, Alessio Palum
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(3): 207.     CrossRef
  • Acute thrombosis of hemorrhoidal nodes: conservative against surgical treatment
    A. Ya. Ilkanich, R. A. Kolomyts, Yu. S. Voronin
    Yakut Medical Journal.2025; (2): 40.     CrossRef
  • Hämorrhoidalleiden und stadienabhängige Behandlung (inklusive Analprolaps)
    Oliver Schwandner
    Die Chirurgie.2025; 96(9): 709.     CrossRef
  • Comparative efficacy of lidocaine- and nifedipine-based conservative therapies in acute hemorrhoidal disease: A retrospective cohort study
    Michele Schiano di Visconte
    The Surgeon.2025; 23(6): 406.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative Perianal Abscess and Concomitant Anorectal Fistula: An Extremely Rare Complication After Emergency Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization With Mucopexy for Hemorrhoidal Disease
    Charito Chatzinikolaou, Konstantinos Perivoliotis, Amalia Moula, Kyriakos Psarianos, Alexios Stavrou, Ioannis Baloyiannis, George Rallis
    Case Reports in Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Tissue selecting therapy stapler minimally invasive surgery to treat severe hemorrhoids
    Rong Huang, Minghu Fan, Hongwu Lin, Laibin Luo
    BMC Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transverse perineal support improves long-term outcomes in patients undergoing stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation syndrome: a multicenter observational case-control study
    Adolfo Renzi, Luigi Marano, Pasquale Talento, Luigi Brusciano, Angela Pezzolla, Domenico Izzo, Carmine Antropoli, Francesco D’Aniello, Giandomenico Di Sarno, Gianluca Minieri, Grazia Cantore, Gianmattia Terracciano, Domenico Barbato, Ludovico Docimo, Mass
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(4): 330.     CrossRef
  • Hemorrhoidal Disease
    Jean H. Ashburn
    JAMA.2025; 334(17): 1541.     CrossRef
  • From the Editor: Uniting expertise, a new era of global collaboration in coloproctology
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 285.     CrossRef
  • Lower pain, less itching, and faster healing after ultrasound scalpel-assisted hemorrhoidectomy using an intimate cleaner containing chlorhexidine, acid hyaluronic acid, and natural anti-inflammatories: a multicenter observational case-control study
    Antonio Brillantino, Luigi Marano, Maurizio Grillo, Alessio Palumbo, Fabrizio Foroni, Luciano Vicenzo, Alessio Antropoli, Michele Lanza, Maria Laura Sandoval Sotelo, Nicola Sangiuliano, Mauro Maglio, Rosanna Filosa, Lucia Abbatiello, Maria Preziosa Romano
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 602.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Anorectal benign disease
The importance of compression time in stapled hemorrhoidopexy: is patience a virtue?
Byung Eun Yoo, Wook Ho Kang, Yong Teak Ko, Young Chan Lee, Cheong Ho Lim
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(2):176-181.   Published online December 20, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00556.0079
  • 4,148 View
  • 149 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether longer compression time before firing the stapler reduced the postoperative complications related to staple line formation in stapled hemorrhoidopexy.
Methods
This retrospective case-control study was conducted at a colorectal-anal specialty hospital. Consecutive patients with grades III and IV hemorrhoids who underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy between January 2016 and November 2019 were included. According to the compression time, patients were assigned to the long compression time group (2 minutes) or the typical compression time group (30 seconds). The primary outcome measure was incidence of staple line complications such as dehiscence, bleeding, and stenosis.
Results
A total of 348 patients treated with stapled hemorrhoidopexy were evaluated. Seventy-three and 275 patients were included in the long compression time group and the typical compression time group, respectively. No significant differences were observed in patient characteristics between the groups. However, additional procedures were performed more frequently in the typical compression time group (78.1% vs. 92.0%, P=0.001). Bleeding occurred more frequently in the typical compression time group (1.4% vs. 8.4%, P=0.030). The rates of dehiscence and stenosis were not significantly different between the groups. Fecal urgency developed more frequently in the typical compression time group (0% vs. 5.1%, P=0.040). In logistic regression analysis, typical compression time (30 seconds) was the only risk factor for bleeding (odds ratio, 8.496; P=0.040).
Conclusion
Longer compression time was associated with a decreased incidence of postoperative bleeding after stapled hemorrhoidopexy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Latest Research Trends on the Management of Hemorrhoids
    Sung Il Kang
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2025; 9(2): 179.     CrossRef
Long-term outcomes of high-volume stapled hemorroidopexy to treat symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease
Alessandro Sturiale, Raad Dowais, Bernardina Fabiani, Claudia Menconi, Felipe Celedon Porzio, Virginia Coli, Gabriele Naldini
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(1):11-16.   Published online July 29, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.00227.0032
  • 10,305 View
  • 223 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 9 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The study aimed to assess the long-term results of the stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) using high-volume devices equipped with innovative technology, evaluating recurrence rate, complications rate, and patients’ satisfaction.
Methods
All the patients who underwent SH using high-volume devices (TST Starr plus, Touchstone International Medical Science Corp., Ltd.) for II to IV symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease from November 2012 to December 2014 were enrolled. Between December 2019 and January 2020, all of them were phone called to come to undergo a proctological reevaluation and asked to fill some questionnaires about hemorrhoidal prolapse recurrence, symptoms recurrence, and surgery satisfaction.
Results
Fifty-nine patients with a mean age of 47 years completely answered the questionnaires. Twenty-two of them accepted to come to undergo a proctological reevaluation while 27 preferred to answer only by phone due to their referred wellbeing. The median follow-up was 70.5 months (range, 60–84 months). The recurrence rate was 5.1% with a mean satisfaction level after surgery was 9.1 (range, 0–10) and 84.7% of patients whose satisfaction scored ≥8. The mean value of Cleveland Global Quality of Life assessment was 0.79 (range, 0.71–0.93). There were no cases of new onset of impaired anal continence after surgery.
Conclusion
The new generation high-volume devices to perform SH resulted to be safe and effective for II to IV degree hemorrhoidal prolapse leading to a lower long-term recurrence rate with an evident reduction of postoperative complications in comparison with the low-volume SH.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Worldwide prevalence of haemorrhoids: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Amin Esmaeilnia Shirvani, Kimia Pakdaman, Zahra Maleki, Soroush Soraneh, Fatemeh Rezaei chegini, Kasra Pakdaman, Mohebat Vali, Hossein-Ali Nikbakht, Layla Shojaie, Pouyan Ebrahimi
    Annals of Medicine.2026;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Comparative Analysis of Gastrointestinal Recovery and Pain Management Outcomes in Stapled Versus Open Hemorrhoidectomy: A Meta-Analysis
    Sadaf Khalid, Zameer Hussain Laghari, Muhammad Kashif Rafiq, Ghashia Khan, Hiba Manzoor, Pavisankar Biju Seena, Saud Hussain, Fahmida Khatoon, Farook Ayyub Kantharia, Sana Farook Kantharia
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A comparative study on efficacy and safety of modified partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Tae Gyu Kim, Chul Seung Lee, Dong Geun Lee, Choon Sik Chung, Seung Han Kim, Sang Hwa Yu, Jeong Eun Lee, Gwan Cheol Lee, Dong Woo Kang, Jeong Sub Kim, Gyu Young Jeong
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(2): 145.     CrossRef
  • Stapler Hemorrhoidopexy—Tips and Tricks
    Devender Singh, Niharika Grover, Yashwant Rathore, Piyush Ranjan, Sunil Chumber
    Videoscopy.2025; 35(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of acute and chronic hemorrhoidal disease
    Antonio Brillantino, Adolfo Renzi, Pasquale Talento, Luigi Brusciano, Luigi Marano, Maurizio Grillo, Mauro Natale Maglio, Fabrizio Foroni, Alessio Palumbo, Maria Laura Sandoval Sotelo, Luciano Vicenzo, Michele Lanza, Giovanna Frezza, Massimo Antropoli, Cl
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 287.     CrossRef
  • Lower pain, less itching, and faster healing after ultrasound scalpel-assisted hemorrhoidectomy using an intimate cleaner containing chlorhexidine, acid hyaluronic acid, and natural anti-inflammatories: a multicenter observational case-control study
    Antonio Brillantino, Luigi Marano, Maurizio Grillo, Alessio Palumbo, Fabrizio Foroni, Luciano Vicenzo, Alessio Antropoli, Michele Lanza, Maria Laura Sandoval Sotelo, Nicola Sangiuliano, Mauro Maglio, Rosanna Filosa, Lucia Abbatiello, Maria Preziosa Romano
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 602.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Clinical Manifestations of Hemorrhoidal Disease, Carried Out Surgeries and Prolapsed Anorectal Tissues: Associations with ABO Blood Groups of Patients
    Inese Fišere, Valērija Groma, Šimons Svirskis, Estere Strautmane, Andris Gardovskis
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(15): 5119.     CrossRef
  • Stapled Transanal Rectal Resection (Starr) in the Treatment of Obstructed Defecation: A Systematic Review
    Lorenzo Ripamonti, Angelo Guttadauro, Giulia Lo Bianco, Maria Rennis, Matteo Maternini, Gerardo Cioffi, Marco Chiarelli, Matilde De Simone, Ugo Cioffi, Francesco Gabrielli
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Indications, Feasibility, and Safety of TST STARR Plus Stapler for Degree III Hemorrhoids: A Retrospective Study of 125 Hemorrhoids Patients
    Jun Wei, Xufeng Ding, Jie Jiang, Lijiang Ji, Hua Huang
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
Benign proctology
Prospective Comparative Analysis of the Incidence of Vasovagal Reaction and the Effect of Rectal Submucosal Lidocaine Injection in Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Kyung Jin Cho, Do Yeon Hwang, Hyun Joo Lee, Ki Hoon Hyun, Tae Jung Kim, Duk Hoon Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(5):344-348.   Published online March 16, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.02.12
  • 5,814 View
  • 160 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study was performed to evaluate the incidence of vasovagal reactions (VVRs) and the efficacy of lidocaine injection for prevention.
Methods
One hundred seventeen patients diagnosed with hemorrhoids and scheduled to undergo a stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) were randomly divided according to submucosal injection to the rectum: lidocaine group (n = 53, lidocaine injected just before full closure of the stapler) and control group (n = 58). Outcomes included baseline patient characteristics (American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and previous VVR history), vital signs during the operation, incidence of VVRs (hypotension, bradycardia, dizziness, diaphoresis, and nausea/vomiting), and postoperative complications (pain, bleeding, and urinary retention).
Results
Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. The number of patients with lower abdominal pain after firing the stapler and incidence of dizziness were lower for the lidocaine group than for the control group (9.4% vs. 25.9%, P = 0.017; 0% vs. 8.6%, P = 0.035, respectively). However, there were no significant between-group differences in incidence of nausea and diaphoresis (0% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.172) and syncope (1.9% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.612). Fewer patients in the lidocaine group complained of postoperative pain (41.5% vs. 58.6%, P = 0.072), and these patients used analgesics less frequently than those in the control group (28.3% vs. 36.2%, P = 0.374).
Conclusion
Patients who received a submucosal lidocaine injection prior to SH experienced less lower abdominal pain and dizziness compared with those who received standard treatment. A larger, more detailed prospective study is needed for further analysis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Reducing Pain, Spasm, and Vasovagal Syndrome in Transradial Cardiac Angiography: The Role of Lidocaine Cream and Injectable Lidocaine
    Behrang Bahreini, Saeed Alipour Parsa, Vahid Eslami, Mohammad Khani, Abdolhamid Bagheri
    International Journal of Cardiovascular Practice.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • PROSPECT guideline for haemorrhoid surgery
    Alexis Bikfalvi, Charlotte Faes, Stephan M. Freys, Girish P. Joshi, Marc Van de Velde, Eric Albrecht
    European Journal of Anaesthesiology Intensive Care.2023; 2(3): e0023.     CrossRef
  • Treatment of Hemorrhoid in Unusual Condition-Pregnancy
    Hyo Seon Ryu
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Effort to Reduce Vasovagal Reaction and Abdominal Pain During Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
    Hyeonseok Jeong
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(5): 291.     CrossRef
Early Experience With a Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Treating Patients With Grades III–IV Prolapsing Hemorrhoids
Hyeonseok Jeong, Sunghwan Hwang, Kil O Ryu, Jiyong Lim, Hyun Tae Kim, Hye Mi Yu, Jihoon Yoon, Ju-Young Lee, Hyoung Rae Kim, Young Gil Choi
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(1):28-34.   Published online February 28, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.1.28
  • 12,606 View
  • 142 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 13 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Circular stapled hemorrhoidopexy (CSH) is widely used to treat patients with grades III–IV hemorrhoids because of less pain and short hospital stay. However, this procedure is associated with some complications, such as urge to defecate, anal stenosis, staple line dehiscence, abscess and sepsis. To avoid these complications, surgeons perform a partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy (PSH). The aim of this study is to present our early experience with the PSH.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 58 patients with hemorrhoids who were treated with a PSH at Busan Hang-Un Hospital from January 2016 to June 2016. A specially designed tri-window anoscope was used, and a purse string suture was made at the mucosae of the protruding hemorrhoids through the window of the anoscope. The hemorrhoidopexy was done by using a circular stapler.

Results

Of the 58 patients included in this study, 34 were male and 24 were female patients (mean age, 50.4 years). The mean operation time was 12.4 minutes, and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 3.8 days. Three patients experienced bleeding (5.1%) 5 urinary retention (8.6%) and 5 skin tags (8.6%). Urge to defecate, tenesmus, abscess, rectovaginal fistula, anal stricture, incontinence, and recurrence did not occur.

Conclusion

PSH is a minimally invasive, feasible, and safe technique for treating patients with grades III–IV hemorrhoids. A PSH, instead of a CSH, can be used to treat certain patients with hemorrhoids.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Assessment of the efficacy and safety of pudendal nerve block in post-hemorrhoidectomy pain: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Jun Li, Hai-Qiong Wu, Jun-Tao Zhang, Shi-Jian Liu, Ke-Lin Peng
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2025; 48(3): 1607.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of metronidazole in reducing pain after hemorrhoidectomy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Hui Dong, Wen-Xing Chen, Yue-Juan Li, Deng-Chao Wang
    BMC Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A comparative study on efficacy and safety of modified partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Tae Gyu Kim, Chul Seung Lee, Dong Geun Lee, Choon Sik Chung, Seung Han Kim, Sang Hwa Yu, Jeong Eun Lee, Gwan Cheol Lee, Dong Woo Kang, Jeong Sub Kim, Gyu Young Jeong
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(2): 145.     CrossRef
  • Modified stapled hemorrhoidopexy for lower postoperative stenosis: A five-year experience
    Yu-Hong Liu, Tzu-Chiao Lin, Chao-Yang Chen, Ta-Wei Pu
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(9): 2787.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of Modified Tissue Selection Therapy Stapler in the Treatment of Prolapsing Hemorrhoids
    Chenchen Yuan, Chongjun Zhou, Rong Xue, Xiaofeng Jin, Chun Jin, Chenguo Zheng
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of the clinical efficacy and safety of TST33 mega hemorrhoidectomy for severe prolapsed hemorrhoids
    Liu Tao, Jun Wei, Xu-Feng Ding, Li-Jiang Ji
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2022; 10(18): 6060.     CrossRef
  • Perirectal Hematoma and Intra-Abdominal Bleeding after Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy and STARR—A Proposal for a Decision-Making Algorithm
    Georgi Popivanov, Piergiorgio Fedeli, Roberto Cirocchi, Massimo Lancia, Domenico Mascagni, Michela Giustozzi, Ivan Teodosiev, Kirien Kjossev, Marina Konaktchieva
    Medicina.2020; 56(6): 269.     CrossRef
  • The Effort to Reduce Vasovagal Reaction and Abdominal Pain During Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
    Hyeonseok Jeong
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(5): 291.     CrossRef
  • Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Circumferential Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy for Grade III to IV Prolapsing Hemorrhoids: A Randomized, Noninferiority Trial
    Hong-Cheng Lin, Qiu-Lan He, Wan-Jin Shao, Xin-Lin Chen, Hui Peng, Shang-Kui Xie, Xiao-Xue Wang, Dong-Lin Ren
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2019; 62(2): 223.     CrossRef
  • Transanale Hämorrhoiden-Dearterialisation vs. selektive Stapler-Hämorrhoidopexie
    R. Proßt
    coloproctology.2018; 40(1): 47.     CrossRef
  • Hemorrhoids
    Danny O. Jacobs
    Current Opinion in Gastroenterology.2018; 34(1): 46.     CrossRef
  • Partial Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy Versus Circular Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
    Jin Sub Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(1): 7.     CrossRef
  • A prospective randomized controlled trial evaluating the short-term outcomes of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization versus tissue-selecting technique
    A. L. H. Leung, T. P. P. Cheung, K. Tung, Y. P. Tsang, H. Cheung, C. W. Lau, C. N. Tang
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2017; 21(9): 737.     CrossRef
Case Report
Persistent Bleeding Following a Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy
Seong Dae Lee, Sung Taek Jung, Jae-Bum Lee, Mi Jung Kim, Doo-Seok Lee, Eui-Gon Youk, Do-Sun Kim, Doo-Han Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(3):120-122.   Published online June 30, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.3.120
  • 6,900 View
  • 41 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

A stapled hemorrhoidopexy (SH) is widely used for treatment of patients with grades III and IV hemorrhoids. The SH is easy to perform, is associated with less pain and allows early return to normal activities. However, complications, whether severe or not, have been reported. Here, we present the case of a female patient with persistent bleeding after a SH. The bleeding was caused by the formation of granulation tissue at the stapler line, diagnosed with sigmoidoscopy, and successfully treated via transanal excision (TAE) under spinal anesthesia. The biopsy showed inflammatory granulation tissue. After the TAE, her symptom was completely gone.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A comparative study on efficacy and safety of modified partial stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus conventional hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial
    Tae Gyu Kim, Chul Seung Lee, Dong Geun Lee, Choon Sik Chung, Seung Han Kim, Sang Hwa Yu, Jeong Eun Lee, Gwan Cheol Lee, Dong Woo Kang, Jeong Sub Kim, Gyu Young Jeong
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(2): 145.     CrossRef
Original Article
The Significance of Staple Line Height in a Stapled Hemorrhoidopexy.
Min, HoKyun , Kim, Hungdai , Kim, Hyungook , Han, Won Kon
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(1):8-11.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.1.8
  • 11,465 View
  • 40 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
In 1998, Longo introduced a novel operative technique for hemorrhoids. That technique uses a prolapse and hemorrhoid (PPH) stapler. His results showed minimal pain, short hospital stay, and rapid return to normal social life. However, a higher height of staple line yields less postoperative pain, but more residual piles, and vice versa. This study was designed to find the optimal height of the staple line for a PPH hemorrhoidopexy.
METHODS
A total of 65 consecutive patients scheduled for a PPH hemorrhoidopexy on grade II or higher internal hemorrhoids were included in this study. The hemorrhoidopexy was performed as in the literature. A purse-string suture was made 5 cm from the anal verge. Remaining piles were excised immediately after the firing of the PPH stapler. Patients were divided into 2 groups. In group A, the staple line was located above 2 cm proximal to the dentate line, and in group B, it was located below 2 cm proximal to the dentate line.
RESULTS
The mean subjective pain score of group A was 2.00, and that of group B was 1.98 (P=0.898). The mean hospital stay of group A was 2.5 days, and that of group B was 2.7 days (P=0.431). Group A returned to normal life in a mean of 7.1 days whereas group B returned to normal life in a mean of 6.8 days (P=0.474). Complications included 6 cases of voiding difficulty, 3 cases of heavy sensation in anus, 1 case of temporary fecal incontinence, and 1 case of anal pain caused by long-standing residual staples.
CONCLUSION
No meaningful relationship was found to exist between the staple line height and either pain or the number of days to return to normal life. However, the incidence of residual piles was lower in cases with a low staple line height. Therefore, the level of the staple line should be lower than it is for a conventional Longo procedure.
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP