Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
2 "Locally advanced rectal cancer"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Display
Original Articles
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer,Epidemiology & etiology
Characteristics of Patients Presented With Metastases During or After Completion of Chemoradiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Case Series
Radwan Torky, Mohammed Alessa, Ho Seung Kim, Ahmed Sakr, Eman Zakarneh, Fozan Sauri, Heejin Bae, Nam Kyu Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(3):186-191.   Published online September 18, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.08.10.1
  • 5,626 View
  • 104 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is managed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT), followed by surgery. Herein we reported patients with metastases during or after CRT.
Methods
Data of patients with LARC who received CRT from 2008 to 2017 were reviewed. Patients with metastases after CRT were included. Those with metastatic tumors at the initial diagnosis were excluded.
Results
Fourteen patients (1.3%) of 1,092 who received CRT presented with metastases. Magnetic resonance circumferential resection margin (mrCRM) and mesorectal lymph nodes (LNs) were positive in 12 patients (85.7%). Meanwhile, magnetic resonance extramural vascular invasion (mrEMVI) was positive in 10 patients (71.4%). Magnetic resonance tumor regression grade (mrTRG) 4 and mrTRG5 was detected in 5 and 1 patient respectively. Ten patients (71.4%) underwent combined surgery and 3 (21.4%) received palliative chemotherapy.
Conclusion
Patients with metastases after CRT showed a higher rate of positive mrCRM, mrEMVI, mesorectal LNs, and poor tumor response. Further studies with a large number of patients are necessary for better survival outcomes in LARC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Clinical implications of radiologic criteria and prognostic factors for lateral lymph node metastasis in low rectal cancer
    Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(6): 489.     CrossRef
  • Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341.     CrossRef
  • Advances in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases: A Focus on Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
    Youngbae Jeon, Eun Jung Park
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Recent Advance in the Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 213.     CrossRef
  • Update on Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
    Chan Wook Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
Pelvic Exenteration as the Treatment for Recurrent or Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.
Song, Seong Kyu , Park, Yong Keun , Suh, Kwang Wook
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2005;21(5):314-319.
  • 1,509 View
  • 10 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the value of pelvic exenteration (PE) for recurrent or locally advanced rectal cancer.
METHODS
This retrospective study analyzed 20 patients who underwent PE for rectal cancer from June 1994 to October 2003 in Ajou University Hospital. The surgical severity, the postoperative complications, and the survival rate were analyed based on the medical records.
RESULTS
The mean operation time was 221.5+/-93.0 minutes, the mean blood loss 750.5+/-223.3 cc, and the mean transfusion amount RBC 6.5+/-4.3 units. Operative mortality was 5% (1/20). A bleeding-associated complication was noted in one patient who underwent a reoperation for hemostasis. Other minor complications were small bowel obstruction (n=3), abdominal wound infection (n=5), vesicocutaneous fistula (n=2), delayed healing of the perineal wound (n=10). The overall 5-year survival rate was 52.6% (10 of 19 patients, excluding the operative mortality case).
CONCLUSIONS
Our study showed acceptable surgical severity and postoperative complications and a favorable 5-year survival rate (> or =50%) for pelvic exenteration as a treatment for recurrent or locally advanced rectal cancer. With strictly selected patients, PE may be one of the treatment options for recurrent or locally advanced rectal cancer.
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP