Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Review

ERAS

Tolerance to and postoperative outcomes with early oral feeding following elective bowel surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis: Lord Mvoula, Evelyn Irizarry; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(6):538-547. Published online July 31, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00472.0067

12,675 View
164 Download
1 Web of Science
2 Citations

Purpose
Advancements in gastrointestinal surgery have directed attention toward optimizing recovery, including through the use of feeding methods that reduce prolonged postoperative hospital stays, complications, and mortality, among other undesirable outcomes. This study’s primary goals were to identify current peer-reviewed literature reporting the postoperative outcomes of elective bowel surgery and to evaluate the clinical evidence of patients’ tolerance to oral feeding following elective bowel surgery.
Methods
An exhaustive literature search was conducted via PubMed and Scopus. The search results were screened for potential articles, and articles were assessed for eligibility based on prespecified eligibility criteria. The data were synthesized, and the results were reported and discussed thematically.
Results
The database search yielded 1,667 articles, from which 18 randomized controlled trials were chosen for inclusion in this study. This study included 874 early oral feeding (EOF) patients, 865 traditional oral feeding patients, and 91 patients whose postoperative care was unspecified. Data synthesis was done, and meta-analyses were conducted. The results showed that EOF patients required a significantly shorter time to tolerate a solid diet and had shorter hospital stays. In addition, bowel function was restored earlier in EOF groups.
Conclusion
The results show good tolerance to EOF, shorter hospitalizations, and faster restoration of bowel function, suggesting that EOF after elective bowel surgery is relatively safe. However, further studies with similar baseline conditions should be conducted to verify these results.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Outcomes of patients with cancer receiving early feeding following gastric, small intestinal or colorectal surgery
Thuy Tran, Bach Hoang, Tien Nguyen, Huong Le
World Academy of Sciences Journal.2025; 7(6): 1. CrossRef
Perioperative nutrition practices in gastrointestinal cancer surgery: A nationwide survey among German surgical departments
Rahel Maria Strobel, Katharina Beyer, Johannes Christian Lauscher, Marc Martignoni, Christoph Reißfelder, Tim Vilz, Arved Weimann, Maria Wobith
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef

Case Report

Levator Ani Muscle Posterior Midline Incision Method for Diffrentiation of Anal Fistulas Involving Ischioretal and Pelvirectal Spaces.: Lim, Seok Won; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2008;24(1):72-74.; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2008.24.1.72

2,332 View
18 Download

Abstract PDF: The difference between anal fistulas involving the ischioretal space and pelvirectal space is that in the former the involvement of the anal fistula is low the levator ani muscle whereas in the latter it is above the levator ani muscle. The levator ani muscle posterior midline incision method, which is introduced here, is thought not to injure the anal sphincter; thus, it does not affect the anal function. The method also allow the surgeon to assess readily and accurately whether or not the fistula has invaded the pelvirectal space.

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search