Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
1 "Miss rate"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Display
Original Article
Importance of Early Follow-up Colonoscopy in Patients at High Risk for Colorectal Polyps
Sung Taek Jung, Dae Kyung Sohn, Chang Won Hong, Byung Chang Kim, Ji Won Park, Kyung Su Han, Hee Jin Chang, Hyo Sung Choi, Jae Hwan Oh
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(6):243-247.   Published online December 31, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.6.243
  • 6,375 View
  • 29 Download
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Minimizing the polyp miss rate during colonoscopy is important for patients at high risk for colorectal polyps. We investigated the polyp miss rate and the factors associated with it in high-risk patients.

Methods

The medical records of 163 patients who underwent follow-up colonoscopy between January 2001 and April 2010, which was within 9 months after a polypectomy, because the index colonoscopy had shown multiple (more than 3) adenomas or advanced adenoma were retrospectively reviewed. Miss rates were calculated for all polyps, for neoplastic polyps and for advanced adenomas. Factors associated with the miss rates in these patients, such as the location, shape and size of the polyp, were analyzed.

Results

The miss rates for polyps, adenomas, adenomas <5 mm, adenomas ≥5 mm and advanced adenomas were 32.6%, 20.9%, 17.7%, 3.2%, and 0.9%, respectively. No carcinoma, except for one small carcinoid tumor, was missed. Flat shape and small size (<5 mm) were significantly associated with adenoma miss rate. The miss rate was significantly higher for flat-type advanced adenomas than for protruded-type advanced adenomas (27.7% vs 4.1%).

Conclusion

The polyp miss rate in patients at high risk for colorectal polyps was higher than expected. Efforts are needed to reduce miss rates and improve the quality of colonoscopy. Also, early follow-up colonoscopy is mandatory, especially in patients at high risk.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Removal of GIT lesions and the role of impedance of the injection solution—an innovative approach to known methods
    Martina Lösle, K. E. Grund, B. Duckworth-Mothes
    Journal of Molecular Medicine.2024; 102(8): 1009.     CrossRef
  • An eco-friendly synthesis of Enterococcus sp.–mediated gold nanoparticle induces cytotoxicity in human colorectal cancer cells
    Mathivadani Vairavel, Ezhilarasan Devaraj, Rajeshkumar Shanmugam
    Environmental Science and Pollution Research.2020; 27(8): 8166.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating the Cost-Effective Use of Follow-Up Colonoscopy Based on Screening Findings and Age
    Grace N. Joseph, Farid Heidarnejad, Eric A. Sherer
    Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Impact of a new distal attachment on colonoscopy performance in an academic screening center
    Zacharias P. Tsiamoulos, Ravi Misra, Rajaratanam Rameshshanker, Timothy R. Elliott, Iosif Beintaris, Siwan Thomas-Gibson, Adam Haycock, Noriko Suzuki, Colin Rees, Brian P. Saunders
    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.2018; 87(1): 280.     CrossRef
  • What Matters in Colonoscopy?
    Hyun Shig Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(6): 223.     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP