Annals of Coloproctology

Original Articles

ERAS

Impact of an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program on the management of complications after laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer: Victoria Weets, Hélène Meillat, Jacques Emmanuel Saadoun, Marie Dazza, Cécile de Chaisemartin, Bernard Lelong; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(5):440-450. Published online September 20, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00850.0121

2,401 View
101 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Citations

Graphical Abstract Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) reduces postoperative complications (POCs) after colorectal surgery; however, its impact on the management of POCs remains unclear. This study compared the diagnosis and management of POCs before and after implementing our ERAS protocol after laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer and examined the short- and mid-term oncologic impacts.
Methods
This single-center, retrospective study evaluated all consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer between 2012 and 2021, focusing on the incidence of POCs within 90 days. We compared outcomes before (standard group) and after (ERAS group) the implementation of our ERAS protocol in January 2016.
Results
Significantly fewer patients in the ERAS group developed POCs (standard vs. ERAS, 136 of 380 patients [35.8%] vs.136 of 660 patients [20.6%]; P<0.01). The ERAS group had a significantly shorter mean total length of stay after POCs (13.1 days vs. 11.4 days, P=0.04), and the rates of life-threatening complications (6.7% vs. 0.7%) and 1-year mortality (7.4% vs. 1.5%) were significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the standard group. Among patients with anastomotic complications, laparoscopic reoperation was significantly more common in the ERAS group than in the standard group (8.3% vs. 75.0%, P<0.01). Among patients with postoperative ileus, the diagnosis and recovery times were significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the standard group, resulting in a shorter total length of stay (13.5 days vs. 10 days, P<0.01).
Conclusion
The implementation of an ERAS protocol did not eliminate all POCs, but it did accelerate their diagnosis and management and improved patient outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Optimizing postoperative pain management in minimally invasive colorectal surgery
Soo Young Lee
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 525. CrossRef

Malignant disease,Epidemiology & etiology

Colorectal cancer mortality trends in the era of cancer survivorship in Korea: 2000–2020: Min Hyun Kim, Sanghee Park, Nari Yi, Bobae Kang, In Ja Park; Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(5):343-352. Published online October 28, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00535.0076

5,995 View
170 Download
17 Web of Science
18 Citations

Graphical Abstract Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
Korea has implemented an early screening for colorectal cancer since 2004. However, it is not known whether this has translated into improved survival over the years.
Methods
We acquired colorectal cancer mortality data from the Cause of Death Statistics in Korea from 2000 to 2020. We characterized the data into year of death, cancer-specific loci, and age group. We analyzed age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) according to year of death, age group, and primary location to find trends in colorectal cancer mortality over a 20-year period.
Results
The crude mortality rate of colorectal cancer increased from 8.78 per 100,000 in 2000 to 17.27 per 100,000 in 2020. The second decade was slower in increments compared to the first decade. ASMR showed a decrease over the second decade after an initial increase in the first decade. The decrease was primarily from the lowering of ASMR for rectosigmoid cancers. Age group analysis showed a lowering of ASMR mainly in the 45–59-year, 60–74-year, and ≥ 75-year age groups; however, 0–29-year and 30–44-year age groups showed generally unchanged ASMR over the total period.
Conclusion
After a brief incline of age-specific mortality of colorectal cancers during the early 2000s, colorectal cancer mortality has gradually been decreasing in the past decade. This was mainly due to decreased mortalities in rectosigmoid colon cancers especially in the age groups that were the target of early screening.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Immunological changes and recovery-related factors in older patients with colon cancer: A pilot trial
Byeo Lee Lim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Yousun Ko, Kyung Won Kim, In Ja Park
Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2025; 16(3): 102200. CrossRef
Performance reporting design in artificial intelligence studies using image-based TNM staging and prognostic parameters in rectal cancer: a systematic review
Minsung Kim, Taeyong Park, Bo Young Oh, Min Jeong Kim, Bum-Joo Cho, Il Tae Son
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(1): 13. CrossRef
Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304. CrossRef
In-Hospital Mortality and Associated Factors among Colorectal Cancer Patients in Germany
Karel Kostev, Sarah Krieg, Andreas Krieg, Tom Luedde, Sven H. Loosen, Christoph Roderburg
Cancers.2024; 16(6): 1219. CrossRef
Effect of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping on Improving Diagnostic Values of CT D3 Lymph Node Staging for Right-Sided Colon Cancer
Gyung Mo Son, Tae Un Kim, Mi Sook Yun, ChangYeop Kim, In Young Lee, Su Bum Park, Dong-Hoon Shin, Gi Won Ha
Cancers.2024; 16(20): 3496. CrossRef
Gochujang suppresses cell survival and changes reactive oxygen species metabolism in colorectal cancer cells
Eun-Bi Seo, So-Min Oh, Anna Han
Food & Nutrition Research.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Optimal Indocyanine Green Dosage for Repetitive Angiography for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery
Gyung Mo Son, Sang-Ho Park, Nam Su Kim, Mi Sook Yun, In Young Lee, Myeong-Sook Kwon, Tae Kyun Kim, Eun Hwa Lee, Eun Jung Hwang, Kwang-Ryul Baek
Medicina.2024; 60(12): 1966. CrossRef
Beyond survival: a comprehensive review of quality of life in rectal cancer patients
Won Beom Jung
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 527. CrossRef
Clinical implication of tissue carcinoembryonic antigen expression in association with serum carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer
Abdulmohsin Fawzi Aldilaijan, Young Il Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Jihun Kim, Jun-Soo Ro, Jin Cheon Kim
Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Development and validation of nomogram models to predict radiotherapy or chemotherapy benefit in stage III/IV gastric adenocarcinoma with surgery
Xiangqing Ren, Tian Huang, Xiaolong Tang, Qian Ma, Ya Zheng, Zenan Hu, Yuping Wang, Yongning Zhou
Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic prediction of colorectal cancer using the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio: the importance of inflammatory biomarkers and their association with long-term outcomes
Chul Seung Lee
Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(4): 287. CrossRef
Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341. CrossRef
National cancer screening program for colorectal cancer in Korea
Seung Min Baik, Ryung-Ah Lee
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 333. CrossRef
Recurrence Patterns and Risk Factors after Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: Insights for Postoperative Surveillance Strategies
Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim, Ye Ryung Park, Eun Hae Cho, Jeong Min Choo, Ji-Seon Kim, Se-Jin Baek, Jung-Myun Kwak
Cancers.2023; 15(24): 5791. CrossRef
Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer
In Ja Park
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
How Can We Improve the Tumor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer?
Jeonghee Han
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Inflammatory Response Markers as Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Prognosis
Minsung Kim, Il Tae Son, Bo Young Oh
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Preventing Anastomotic Leakage, a Devastating Complication of Colorectal Surgery
Hyun Gu Lee
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef

Anorectal benign disease

The role of C-reactive protein ratio in predicting mortality in patients with Fournier gangrene: Ismail Cem Eray, Kubilay Dalci, Serdar Gumus, Orcun Yalav, Ahmet Gokhan Saritas, Asli Boz, Ahmet Rencuzogullari; Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(3):223-230. Published online February 3, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00843.0120

3,593 View
140 Download
3 Web of Science
5 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
This study aimed to determine the C-reactive protein (CRP) ratio for the survival of patients with Fournier gangrene (FG).
Methods
Fifty-two patients with FG between January 2011 and September 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Data on clinical presentation, Fournier Gangrene Severity Index (FGSI), CRP ratio, management, and outcome were analyzed. The CRP ratio was calculated as preoperative CRP/postoperative CRP value that measured 48 hours after surgical intervention. Possible alternative cutoff points for the FGSI and CRP were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. The risk factors related to the prognosis were evaluated by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses.
Results
The mean CRP ratios were 6.7±6.6 in the survivor group and 1.2±0.8 in the nonsurvivor group (P=0.001). FGSI was significantly higher in the non-survivor group compared to survivor group (8.5±2.5 vs. 3.5±2.2, P=0.001). There was a negative correlation between FGSI and CRP ratio (r=–0.51). ROC analysis determined the cutoff value as 1.78 for CRP (sensitivity, 86%; specificity, 82%; area under the ROC curve, 0.90) to predict death. The incidence of death for patients with CRP ratio of ≤1.78 increased 26.7 fold for those with CRP ratio of >1.78 (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.8–146.5; P=0.001). In the multivariable logistic regression model, CRP ratio (odds ratio [OR], 10.3; 95% CI, 1.5–72.2; P=0.019) and FGSI (OR, 17.8; 95% CI, 2.6–121.1; P=0.003) were independent risk factors for death.
Conclusion
The CRP ratio is a simple method to use to predict mortality in FG.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Biomarkers to predict 30‐day mortality in patients with Fournier's gangrene disease: a retrospective study
Akile Zengin, Gokberk Alagas, Yusuf Murat Bag, Ahmet Murat Sendil, Ahmet Umit Cebeci, Elif Gundogdu, Yavuz Selim Angin, Mehmet Kılıc, Murat Ulas
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The Value of Fournier’s Gangrene Scoring Systems on Admission to Predict Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Antonio Tufano, Piervito Dipinto, Francesco Passaro, Umberto Anceschi, Giorgio Franco, Rocco Simone Flammia, Flavia Proietti, Luca Antonelli, Giovanni Battista Di Pierro, Francesco Prata, Roberta Rullo, Sisto Perdonà, Costantino Leonardo
Journal of Personalized Medicine.2023; 13(9): 1283. CrossRef
Biomarkers to predict mortality in patients with Fournier’s gangrene admitted to the intensive care unit after surgery in South Korea
In Sik Shin, Seong Chan Gong, Sanghyun An, Kwangmin Kim
Acute and Critical Care.2023; 38(4): 452. CrossRef
Fournier's gangrene. Literature review
Débora Pattussi , Federico Carballo
AG Salud.2023; 1: 83. CrossRef
Delta neutrophil index as a prognostic factor for mortality in patients with Fournier's gangrene
In Sik Shin, Seong Chan Gong, Sanghyun An, Kwangmin Kim
International Journal of Urology.2022; 29(11): 1287. CrossRef

Benign GI diease

Prognostic Factors and Management for Left Colonic Perforation: Can Hartmann’s Procedure Be Preventable?: Yilseok Joo, Yujin Lee, Taeyoung Yoo, Jungbin Kim, Inseok Park, Geumhee Gwak, Hyunjin Cho, Keunho Yang, Kiwhan Kim, Byung-Noe Bae; Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(3):178-185. Published online June 30, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.11.14.1

3,585 View
81 Download
4 Web of Science
4 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
To identify factors significantly associated with the mortality of patients with left colonic perforation, and to compare the outcome of Hartmann’s procedure (HP) and primary repair (PR) or primary anastomosis (PA) in patients with left colonic perforation without factors associated with mortality.
Methods
This retrospective study included patients who underwent surgery for left colonic perforation from January 2009 to February 2018. Preoperative factors related to postoperative mortality, including vital signs, laboratory findings, and intraoperative findings, were analyzed by type of operation. The chi-square, Fisher exact, and Mann-Whitney U-tests were used to analyze the data.
Results
Ninety-one patients were included (36 men, 55 women), and 15 (16.5%) died postoperatively. Prognostic factors were age, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, bleeding tendency, acute kidney injury, hemodynamic instability, and the existence of feculent ascites. Leukopenia and longer operative time were independent risk factors for mortality. Seventy-nine patients did not have leukopenia and 30 of these patients who underwent PR without diversion were excluded from the subanalysis. HP was performed in 30 patients, and PR with diversion and PA with or without diversion were performed in 19. Compared to the other operative methods, HP had no advantage in reducing hospital mortality (P=0.458) and morbidity.
Conclusion
Leukopenia could be an objective prognostic factor for left colonic perforation. Although HP is the gold standard for septic left colonic perforation, it did not improve the hospital mortality of the patients without leukopenia. For such patients, PR or PA may be suggested as an alternative option for left colonic perforation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Risk Factors for Postoperative Major Morbidity, Anastomotic Leakage, Re-Surgery and Mortality in Patients with Colonic Perforation
Maximilian Brunner, Lara Gärtner, Andreas Weiß, Klaus Weber, Axel Denz, Christian Krautz, Georg F. Weber, Robert Grützmann
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(17): 5220. CrossRef
Evaluation of Morbidity and Mortality in Iatrogenic Colonic Perforation During Colonoscopy: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Ajibola A Adebisi, Daniel E Onobun, Adeola Adediran, Reginald N Ononye, Ethel O Ojo, Adedayo Oluyi, Ayotunde Ojo, Stephen Oputa
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Patient outcomes and prognostic factors associated with colonic perforation surgery: a retrospective study
Do-bin Lee, Seonhui Shin, Chun-Seok Yang
Journal of Yeungnam Medical Science.2022; 39(2): 133. CrossRef
Morbidity and Mortality of Neutropenic Patients in Visceral Surgery: A Narrative Review
Ann-Kathrin Lederer, Fabian Bartsch, Markus Moehler, Peter Gaßmann, Hauke Lang
Cells.2022; 11(20): 3314. CrossRef

Management Outcomes of Colonoscopic Perforations Are Affected by the General Condition of the Patients: Jae Ho Park, Kyung Jong Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(1):16-22. Published online February 28, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.34.1.16

4,811 View
106 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

The management of a colonoscopic perforation (CP) varies from conservative to surgical. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcomes between surgical and conservative treatment of patients with a CP.

Methods

From 2003 to 2016, the medical records of patients with CP were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on whether they initially received conservative or surgical treatment.

Results

During the study period, a total of 48 patients with a CP were treated. Among them, 5 patients had underlying colorectal cancer and underwent emergency radical cancer surgery; these patients were excluded. The mean age of the remaining 43 patients was 64.5 years old, and the most common perforation site was the sigmoid colon (15 patients). The initial conservative care group included 16 patients, and the surgery group included 27 patients. In the conservative group, 5 patients required conversion to surgery (failure rate: 5 of 16 [31.3%]). Of the surgery group, laparoscopic surgery was performed on 19 patients and open surgery on 8 patients, including 2 conversion cases. Major postoperative complications developed in 11 patients (34.4%), and postoperative mortality developed in 4 patients (12.5%). The only predictor for poor prognosis after surgery was a high American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification.

Conclusion

In this study, conservative treatment for patients with a CP had a relatively high failure rate. Furthermore, surgical treatment showed significant rates of complications and mortality, which depended on the general status of the patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Multicenter retrospective evaluation of ileocecocolic perforations associated with diagnostic lower gastrointestinal endoscopy in dogs and cats
Vanessa L. Woolhead, Jacqueline C. Whittemore, Sarah A. Stewart
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.2020; 34(2): 684. CrossRef

Surgical Outcomes and Risk Factors in Patients Who Underwent Emergency Colorectal Surgery: Dai Sik Jeong, Young Hun Kim, Kyung Jong Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(6):239-244. Published online December 31, 2017; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.6.239

5,403 View
111 Download
11 Web of Science
11 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

Emergency colorectal surgery has high rates of complications and mortality because of incomplete bowel preparation and bacterial contamination. The authors aimed to evaluate the surgical outcomes and the risk factors for the mortality and the complication rates of patients who underwent emergency surgery to treat colorectal diseases.

Methods

This is a prospective study from January 2014 to April 2016, and the results are based on a retrospective analysis of the clinical results for patients who underwent emergency colorectal surgery at Chosun University Hospital.

Results

A total of 99 patients underwent emergency colorectal surgery during the study period. The most frequent indication of surgery was perforation (75.8%). The causes of disease were colorectal cancer (19.2%), complicated diverticulitis (21.2%), and ischemia (27.2%). There were 27 mortalities (27.3%). The major morbidity was 39.5%. Preoperative hypotension and perioperative blood transfusion were independent risk factors for both morbidity and mortality.

Conclusion

These results revealed that emergency colorectal surgeries are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, the independent risk factors for both morbidity and mortality in such patiients were preoperative hypotension and perioperative transfusion.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Effects of the COVID‐19 pandemic on short‐term postoperative outcomes for colorectal perforation: A nationwide study in Japan based on the National Clinical Database
Shimpei Ogawa, Hideki Endo, Masahiro Yoshida, Tomomitsu Tsuru, Michio Itabashi, Hiroyuki Yamamoto, Yoshihiro Kakeji, Hideki Ueno, Yuko Kitagawa, Taizo Hibi, Akinobu Taketomi, Norihiko Ikeda, Masaki Mori
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2024; 8(3): 450. CrossRef
Effects of surgeon specialization on the outcome of emergency colorectal surgery
Nahar A. Alselaim, Ohood H. AlAamer, Mohammed M. Almalki, Abdualziz A. Al-osail, Sultanah F. Bin Gheshayan
Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2024; 86(12): 7010. CrossRef
Association between Intraoperative Early Warning Score and Mortality and In-Hospital Stay in Lower Gastrointestinal Spontaneous Perforation
Kazuya Takada, Yusuke Nagamine, Akira Ishii, Yan Shuo, Takumi Seike, Hanako Horikawa, Kentaro Matsumiya, Tetsuya Miyashita, Takahisa Goto, Ronald G. Pearl
Anesthesiology Research and Practice.2023; 2023: 1. CrossRef
Sigmoid colon cancer presenting as a left inguinal hernia: a case report
Mohammad E. Al Mohtasib, Mohammad N. Emar, Anan I. Al-jabari, Taima M. Aljabari, Islam H. Karajeh, Qutaiba Y. Al Jawabrah, Raghad M. Dghaish, Fahmi Jubran, Shadi Ruzayqat
Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2023; 85(11): 5653. CrossRef
Factors associated with 30-day mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery
Nahar A. Alselaim, Muhannad Abdulrahman Alsemari, Mesnad Alyabsi, Abrar M. Al-Mutairi
Annals of Saudi Medicine.2023; 43(6): 364. CrossRef
Efficiency of pre-operative preparation of intestines at treatment of sharp intestinal impassability tumoral genesis
H. Sh. Nazarov, Sh. К. Nazarov, N. Sh. Hasanov
Health care of Tajikistan.2022; (2): 59. CrossRef
Fluid management for critical patients undergoing urgent colectomy
Fabian Grass, Basile Pache, Fabio Butti, Josep Solà, Dieter Hahnloser, Nicolas Demartines, Martin Hübner
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.2020; 26(1): 109. CrossRef
Emergency surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: A nationwide study in Japan based on the National Clinical Database
Nobuaki Hoshino, Hideki Endo, Koya Hida, Nao Ichihara, Yoshimitsu Takahashi, Hiroshi Hasegawa, Toshimoto Kimura, Yuko Kitagawa, Yoshihiro Kakeji, Hiroaki Miyata, Takeo Nakayama, Yoshiharu Sakai
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2020; 4(5): 549. CrossRef
Gestione delle complicanze infettive intra-addominali e delle peritoniti postoperatorie in chirurgia viscerale
A. Mancini, J. Abba, C. Arvieux
EMC - Tecniche Chirurgiche Addominale.2020; 26(4): 1. CrossRef
Tratamiento de las complicaciones infecciosas intraabdominales y de la peritonitis postoperatoria en cirugía visceral
A. Mancini, J. Abba, C. Arvieux
EMC - Técnicas Quirúrgicas - Aparato Digestivo.2020; 36(4): 1. CrossRef
Colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery in malignant large bowel obstruction: oncological outcomes
N. E. Donlon, M. E. Kelly, F. Narouz, P. H. McCormick, J. O. Larkin, B. J. Mehigan
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2019; 34(4): 613. CrossRef

Predictors of Morbidity and Mortality After Surgery for Intestinal Perforation: Rumi Shin, Sang Mok Lee, Beonghoon Sohn, Dong Woon Lee, Inho Song, Young Jun Chai, Hae Won Lee, Hye Seong Ahn, In Mok Jung, Jung Kee Chung, Seung Chul Heo; Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(6):221-227. Published online December 31, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.6.221

9,656 View
90 Download
36 Web of Science
38 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

An intestinal perforation is a rare condition, but has a high mortality rate, even after immediate surgical intervention. The clinical predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality are still not well established, so this study attempted to identify risk factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality after surgery for an intestinal perforation.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 117 patients who underwent surgery for an intestinal perforation at a single institution in Korea from November 2008 to June 2014. Factors related with postoperative mortality at 1 month and other postoperative complications were investigated.

Results

The mean age of enrolled patients was 66.0 ± 15.8 years and 66% of the patients were male. Fifteen patients (13%) died within 1 month after surgical treatment. Univariate analysis indicated that patient-related factors associated with mortality were low systolic and diastolic blood pressure, low serum albumin, low serum protein, low total cholesterol, and high blood urea nitrogen; the surgery-related factor associated with mortality was feculent ascites. Multivariate analysis using a logistic regression indicated that low systolic blood pressure and feculent ascites independently increased the risk for mortality; postoperative complications were more likely in both females and those with low estimated glomerular filtration rates and elevated serum C-reactive protein levels.

Conclusion

Various factors were associated with postoperative clinical outcomes of patients with an intestinal perforation. Morbidity and mortality following an intestinal perforation were greater in patients with unstable initial vital signs, poor nutritional status, and feculent ascites.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Emergency physician ultrasound diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum in intraoperative patients with peritoneal insufflation
Amy Sanghvi, Makoto Tanigawa, Michael Danta, Jeff Yang, Mohammad Hamshow, Errel Khordipour, Lawrence Haines, Leily Naraghi
The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.2025; 90: 120. CrossRef
Prognostic determinants in surgical critial patients undergoing emergency surgery for Stage III or higher colorectal cancer
Hyun Ho Kim, Sanguk Hwang, Jinbeom Cho
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
In Situ 4D Printing of Polyelectrolyte/Magnetic Composites for Sutureless Gastric Perforation Sealing
Yunsong Shi, Sihan Tang, Xi Yuan, Zhuofan Li, Shifeng Wen, Zhongwei Li, Bin Su, Chunze Yan, Lili Chen
Advanced Materials.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Small Intestinal Perforation after 360-Degree Liposuction: A Case Report
Jenna C. Bekeny, Samuel S. Huffman, Chris Thomas, Mariana Tumminello, Anna Kata, Rajiv Parikh, Laura K. Tom, Grant M. Kleiber
Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.2024; 48(5): 946. CrossRef
Issues of informed consent for non-specialists conducting colorectal cancer screenings
Forrest Bohler, Allison Garden
Journal of Osteopathic Medicine.2024; 124(1): 39. CrossRef
Prevalence, Pattern, Mortality, and Morbidity of Traumatic Small Bowel Perforation at King Abdulaziz Medical City: A Retrospective Cohort Study
Fahad Aljehaiman, Faisal J Almalki, Abdulah Alhusain, Faris Alsalamah, Khaled Alzahrani, Abdulkareem Alharbi, Hani Alkhulaiwi
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Abdominal pain after a food crawl
Danier Ong, Rajiv Yogendran, Emily Fite
Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Case of abdominal whirl sign with small bowel obstruction and free gas successfully managed by conservative management instead of laparoscopic surgery
Giuleta Jamsari, James Wei Tatt Toh
Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery.2024; 7(3): 128. CrossRef
Emergent Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Malignancy Is Associated with Higher Rates of Perioperative Complications but No Independent Impact on Short-Term Mortality
Yahya Alwatari, Devon C. Freudenberger, Jad Khoraki, Lena Bless, Riley Payne, Walker A. Julliard, Rachit D. Shah, Carlos A. Puig
Journal of Chest Surgery.2024; 57(2): 160. CrossRef
Urea to Albumin Ratio Is an Excellent Predictor of Death in Patients With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections
Evgeni Dimitrov, Krasimira Halacheva, Georgi Minkov, Emil Enchev, Yovcho Yovtchev
Surgical Infections.2024; 25(3): 225. CrossRef
Postoperative Complications in Emergency Surgeries at a Referral Hospital in Eastern Venezuela
Victor Castañeda-Marquez, Yeisson Rivero-Moreno, Enrique Avila-Liendo, Gabriel Gonzalez-Quinde, Wilson Garcia-Cazorla, Georcimar Mendez-Meneses, Yoalkris E Salcedo, Tamara Rodriguez-Rugel, Jackner Antigua-Herrera, Miguel Rivas-Perez, Silvia Agudelo-Mendoz
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Gastrointestinal tract perforation after radiofrequency ablation for hepatic tumor: Incidence and risk factors
Kyowon Gu, Tae Wook Kang, Seungchul Han, Dong Ik Cha, Kyoung Doo Song, Min Woo Lee, Hyunchul Rhim, Go Eun Park
European Journal of Radiology.2024; 177: 111560. CrossRef
Revisiting Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) and Portsmouth-POSSUM (P-POSSUM) Scores: Are They Valid in Cases of Ileal Perforation?
Saikrishna Eswaravaka, Chirantan Suhrid, Bhavya Rao, Sundaresh Prabhakar, Jayashri Pandya
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
A giant trichobezoar in a child with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A case report
M. Forooghi, R. Shahrokhi, Sh. Yousufzai
International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2024; 123: 110283. CrossRef
Factors related to cardiac rupture after acute myocardial infarction
Xue Gao, Ying Guo, Xiaoting Zhu, Chunlei Du, Beibei Ma, Yinghua Cui, Shuai Wang
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Investigating the association between osteopenia and bowel perforation through a multicenter radiologic analysis
Sebastian Sanduleanu, Koray Ersahin, Jonathan Kottlors, Johannes Bremm, Narmin Talibova, Tim Damer, Merve Erdogan, Nils Groβe Hokamp, Lukas Goertz, Nijat Nasirov, Vilayat Valiyev, Christiane Bruns, David Maintz, Nuran Abdullayev
Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Case report: Migratory biliary stent resulting in sigmoid colon perforation
Jasmine B Beloy, Nicholas P Lund, Annika M Van Hell, Shyam Allamaneni
Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic factors in patients with gastrointestinal perforation under the acute care surgery model : a retrospective cohort study
Kiyoung Sung, Sanguk Hwang, Jaeheon Lee, Jinbeom Cho
BMC Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Characteristics, treatment, and outcome of patients with bowel perforation after immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure
Antonio Pizuorno Machado, Malek Shatila, Cynthia Liu, Yang Lu, Mehmet Altan, Isabella C. Glitza Oliva, Dan Zhao, Hao Chi Zhang, Anusha Thomas, Yinghong Wang
Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(9): 5989. CrossRef
Abdominal emergency surgery in patients with hematological malignancies: a retrospective single-center analysis
Philipp H. von Kroge, Anna Duprée, Oliver Mann, Jakob R. Izbicki, Jonas Wagner, Paymon Ahmadi, Sören Weidemann, Raissa Adjallé, Nicolaus Kröger, Carsten Bokemeyer, Walter Fiedler, Franziska Modemann, Susanne Ghandili
World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Acute Spontaneous Colonic Perforation in a Case of Newly Confirmed Scleroderma: Case Report
Glenn Goodwin, Christian Ryckeley, Davide Fox, Michael Ashley, Laurence Dubensky, Mauricio Danckers, Todd Slesinger
Interactive Journal of Medical Research.2023; 12: e43295. CrossRef
Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors associated with emergency left colonic surgery
Dauda Bawa, Yasser Mohammad Khalifa, Saleem Khan, Waddah Norah, Nibras Noman
Annals of Saudi Medicine.2023; 43(2): 97. CrossRef
Fatal Case of Perforated Cytomegalovirus Colitis: Case Report and Systematic Review
Andrea T. Fisher, Kovi E. Bessoff, Veronica Nicholas, James Badger, Lisa Knowlton, Joseph D. Forrester
Surgical Infections.2022; 23(2): 127. CrossRef
An adhesive and resilient hydrogel for the sealing and treatment of gastric perforation
Jing Chen, Julia S. Caserto, Ida Ang, Kaavian Shariati, James Webb, Bo Wang, Xi Wang, Nikolaos Bouklas, Minglin Ma
Bioactive Materials.2022; 14: 52. CrossRef
Predictors of mortality in patients with acute small-bowel perforation transferred to ICU after emergency surgery: a single-centre retrospective cohort study
Jianzhang Wu, Ping Shu, Hongyong He, Haojie Li, Zhaoqing Tang, Yihong Sun, Fenglin Liu
Gastroenterology Report.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Delayed ileal perforation following lollipop-stick ingestion in a two year old
Tareq Swedan, Mohamed Morjan, Mulham Jarjanazi, Nafiza Martini, Alaa Aldin Ismail, Hebatullah Awad, Shamseh Benbash
Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports.2022; 81: 102276. CrossRef
The Clinical Significance of Shock Index and GFR in the Differential Diagnosis of Perforated Appendicitis
Ferhat ÇAY, Ali DURAN
Journal of Contemporary Medicine.2022; 12(4): 504. CrossRef
The Impact of Delayed Surgical Care on Patient Outcomes With Alimentary Tract Perforation: Insight From a Low-Middle Income Country
Muhammad H Zafar, Taha A Zaka Ur Rehman, Muhammad Sohaib Khan, Shayan Ahmed, Amir Shariff
Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Gangrene of the Colon Ascendens, Colon Transversum, and Lienal Flexure in a Massive Strangulated Umbilical Hernia
Stanko Baco, Milos Mitric
Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Facility of Origin Predicts Mortality After Colonic Perforation
Samuel D. Butensky, Emma Gazzara, Gainosuke Sugiyama, Gene F. Coppa, Antonio Alfonso, Paul J. Chung
The American Surgeon™.2021; 87(8): 1327. CrossRef
Effect of Malnutrition Assessed by Comprehensive Nutritional Screening Tool on In-Hospital Mortality after Surgery for Gastrointestinal Perforation
Seung-Young Oh, Hannah Lee, Ho Geol Ryu, Hyuk-Joon Lee
Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition.2021; 12(1): 1. CrossRef
Machine Learning-based Model for Predicting Postoperative Complications among Patients with Colonic Perforation: A Retrospective study
Hiroka Hosaka, Masashi Takeuchi, Tomohiro Imoto, Haruka Yagishita, Ayaka Yu, Yusuke Maeda, Yosuke Kobayashi, Yoshie Kadota, Masanori Odaira, Fumiki Toriumi, Takashi Endo, Hirohisa Harada
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2021; 5(3): 274. CrossRef
Bevacizumab and gastrointestinal perforations: a review from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database
Thomas A. Wichelmann, Sufyan Abdulmujeeb, Eli D. Ehrenpreis
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2021; 54(10): 1290. CrossRef
A Rare Presentation of Gastric Carcinoma With Gastric Perforation and Septic Shock
Reem Moala AlHazmi, Dunya Nasrallah Alfaraj, Shaykhah Nasser AlNaimi, Sarah Mohammed AlQahtani, Mashael Hamed AlJuwayed, Hazem Mohammed Zakriea, Mohammed S Foula
Cureus.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
C-Reactive Protein as a Marker of Postoperative Complication of Emergency Colorectal Surgery
Luis R. M. Nadal, Artur M. A. da Silva, Larissa Johann, Shuaib H. El Boustani, Maria Beatriz A. S. Medrado, Jose F. M. Farah, Renato A. Lupinacci
Journal of Coloproctology.2021; 41(04): 375. CrossRef
Modified frailty index and hypoalbuminemia as predictors of adverse outcomes in older adults presenting to acute general surgical unit
Angela Abraham, Sally Burrows, Neelankal John Abraham, Bhaskar Mandal
Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología.2020; 55(2): 70. CrossRef
Prognostic Factors and Management for Left Colonic Perforation: Can Hartmann’s Procedure Be Preventable?
Yilseok Joo, Yujin Lee, Taeyoung Yoo, Jungbin Kim, Inseok Park, Geumhee Gwak, Hyunjin Cho, Keunho Yang, Kiwhan Kim, Byung-Noe Bae
Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(3): 178. CrossRef
Intestinal Perforation: A Surgeon's Nightmare Enlightened by Scientific Research
Byung Soh Min
Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(6): 205. CrossRef

Outcomes and Risk Factors Affecting Mortality in Patients Who Underwent Colorectal Emergency Surgery: Nam Ho Oh, Kyung Jong Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(4):133-138. Published online August 31, 2016; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.4.133

4,137 View
52 Download
15 Web of Science
11 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

Emergency colorectal surgery has a high risk of mortality and morbidity because of incomplete bowel preparation, bacterial proliferation, and contamination. In this study, we investigated the outcomes and the risk factors affecting mortality in patients who had undergone emergency surgery for the treatment of various colorectal diseases.

Methods

This study is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data to survey the clinical results for patients who had undergone emergency colorectal surgery from January 2014 to December 2014. We analyzed various clinicopathologic factors, which were divided into 3 categories: preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative.

Results

A total of 50 patients had undergone emergency colorectal surgery during the time period covered by this study. Among them, 10 patients (20%) died during the postoperative period. A simple linear regression analysis showed that the risk factors for mortality were old age, preoperative hypotension, and a high American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score. Moreover, a multiple linear regression analysis showed a high ASA score and preoperative hypotension to be independent risk factors.

Conclusion

In this study, emergency colorectal surgery showed a relatively high mortality rate. Furthermore, the independent risk factors for mortality were preoperative hypotension and high ASA score; thus, patients with these characteristics need to be evaluated more carefully and receive better care if the mortality rate is to be reduced.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Impact of Surgeon Specialization on Outcomes in Emergency Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Zachary Bunjo, Luke Traeger, Ishraq Murshed, Sergei Bedrikovetski, Nagendra N. Dudi-Venkata, Christopher Dobbins, Tarik Sammour
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2025; 68(1): 14. CrossRef
Postoperative hypotension following acute hip fracture surgery is a predictor of 30-day mortality
Neil Donald, Grace Eniola, Krisztian Deierl
The Bone & Joint Journal.2024; 106-B(2): 189. CrossRef
Emergent colectomy for colorectal cancer: A comparative analysis of open vs. minimally invasive approach
Hunter Jecius, Muhammad Khurrum, Erika Krall, Dynnika Tso, Afang Pefok, Ryan Silva, Emily Wusterbarth, Hina Arif, Mohammad Hamidi, Valentine Nfonsam
The American Journal of Surgery.2023; 225(4): 724. CrossRef
Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors associated with emergency left colonic surgery
Dauda Bawa, Yasser Mohammad Khalifa, Saleem Khan, Waddah Norah, Nibras Noman
Annals of Saudi Medicine.2023; 43(2): 97. CrossRef
Development and Evaluation of a Risk-Adjusted Measure of Intraoperative Hypotension in Patients Having Nonemergent, Noncardiac Surgery
Anna L. Christensen, Ethan Jacobs, Kamal Maheshwari, Fei Xing, Xiaohong Zhao, Samuel E. Simon, Karen B. Domino, Karen L. Posner, Alvin F. Stewart, Joseph A. Sanford, Daniel I. Sessler
Anesthesia & Analgesia.2021; 133(2): 445. CrossRef
Prediction of functional loss in emergency surgery is possible with a simple frailty screening tool
Davide Zattoni, Isacco Montroni, Nicole Marie Saur, Anna Garutti, Maria Letizia Bacchi Reggiani, Federico Ghignone, Giovanni Taffurelli, Giampaolo Ugolini
World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Fluid management for critical patients undergoing urgent colectomy
Fabian Grass, Basile Pache, Fabio Butti, Josep Solà, Dieter Hahnloser, Nicolas Demartines, Martin Hübner
Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice.2020; 26(1): 109. CrossRef
Procalcitonin as an early marker in the detection of anastomotic intestinal leak in a Universitary Hospital of Bogotá
Elkin Eduardo Benítez Navarrete, Tatiana Carolina Beltrán-García, María Fernanda Mosquera, Valeria Martinez Rojas, Daniel Alejandro Buitrago Medina, Carlos Edgar Figueroa Avendaño
Journal of Coloproctology.2020; 40(04): 376. CrossRef
Association of intra‐operative hypotension with acute kidney injury, myocardial injury and mortality in non‐cardiac surgery: A meta‐analysis
Ran An, Qian-Yun Pang, Hong‐Liang Liu
International Journal of Clinical Practice.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Emergency Surgery Mortality (ESM) Score to Predict Mortality and Improve Patient Care in Emergency Surgery
Sirirat Tribuddharat, Thepakorn Sathitkarnmanee, Pavit Sappayanon
Anesthesiology Research and Practice.2019; 2019: 1. CrossRef
Emergent Colorectal Surgery: What Should Be Considered?
Chang-Nam Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(4): 124. CrossRef

Comparative Study of Postoperative Complications in Patients With and Without an Obstruction Who Had Left-Sided Colorectal Cancer and Underwent a Single-Stage Operation After Mechanical Bowel Preparation: Sang Hun Jung, Jae Hwang Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(6):251-258. Published online December 31, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.6.251

3,417 View
43 Download
5 Web of Science
3 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to compare postoperative complications for single-stage surgery after mechanical bowel preparation in patients who experienced obstruction and those who did not.

Methods

From 2000 to 2011, 1,224 patients underwent a single-stage operation for left colorectal cancer after bowel preparation. Nonobstruction (NOB) and obstruction (OB) colorectal cancer patients were 1,053 (86.0%) and 171 (14.0%), respectively. Postoperative morbidity and mortality were compared between groups.

Results

The OB group had poor preoperative conditions (age, white blood cell, hemoglobin, albumin level, and advanced tumor stage) compared with the NOB group (P < 0.05). Mean on-table lavage time for the OB group was 17.5 minutes (range, 14-60 minutes). Mean operation time for the OB group was statistically longer than that of the NOB group (OB: 210 minutes; range, 120-480 minutes vs. NOB: 180 minutes; range, 60-420 minutes; P < 0.001). Overall morbidity was similar between groups (NOB: 19.7% vs. OB: 23.4%, P = 0.259). Major morbidity was more common in the OB group than in the NOB group, but the difference was without significance (OB: 11.7% vs. NOB: 7.6%, P = 0.070). Postoperative death occurred in 16 patients (1.3%), and death in the OB group (n = 7) was significantly higher than it was in the NOB group (n = 9) (4.1% vs. 0.9%, P = 0.001). Twelve patients had surgical complications, which were the leading cause of postoperative death: postoperative bleeding in five patients and leakage in seven patients.

Conclusion

Postoperative morbidity for a single-stage operation for obstructive left colorectal cancer is comparable to that for NOB, regardless of poor conditions of the patient.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Clinical characteristics and risk factors of post-operative intestinal flora disorder following laparoscopic colonic surgery: A propensity-score-matching analysis
Gan-Bin Li, Chen-Tong Wang, Xiao Zhang, Xiao-Yuan Qiu, Wei-Jie Chen, Jun-Yang Lu, Lai Xu, Bin Wu, Yi Xiao, Guo-Le Lin
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(5): 1259. CrossRef
Laparoscopic versus open surgery for obese patients with rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study
Hiroyuki Matsuzaki, Soichiro Ishihara, Kazushige Kawai, Koji Murono, Kensuke Otani, Koji Yasuda, Takeshi Nishikawa, Toshiaki Tanaka, Tomomichi Kiyomatsu, Keisuke Hata, Hiroaki Nozawa, Hironori Yamaguchi, Toshiaki Watanabe
Surgery Today.2017; 47(5): 627. CrossRef
Surgical Treatment of Obstructed Left-Sided Colorectal Cancer Patients
Young Jin Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(6): 245. CrossRef

Safety and Feasibility of a Laparoscopic Colorectal Cancer Resection in Elderly Patients: Duck Hyoun Jeong, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Nam Kyu Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(1):22-27. Published online February 28, 2013; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.1.22

4,295 View
34 Download
21 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose

The aim of this study is to assess the effects of age on the short-term outcomes of a laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer in elderly (≥75 years old), as compared with younger (<75 years old), patients.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer between January 2007 and December 2009 was performed. There were two groups: age <75 years old (group A) and age ≥75 years old (group B). The perioperative outcomes between group A and group B were compared.

Results

The study included 824 patients in group A and 92 patients in group B. The body mass index (BMI) and the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score were significantly different between group B and group A (BMI: 22.5 vs. 23.5, P = 0.002; ASA score: 1.88 vs. 1.48, P = 0.001). Mean operating times were similar between the groups (325.4 minutes vs. 351.6 minutes, P = 0.07). We observed a higher overall complication rate in group B than in group A (12.0% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.047), but the number of severe complications of Accordion Severity Classification ≥3 (those that required an invasive procedure) was not significantly different between the two groups (6.5% vs. 3.4%, P = 0.142). There was no significant difference in the length of hospital stay (13.0 days vs. 12.0 days, P = 0.053).

Conclusion

Although the elderly patients had a significantly higher overall postoperative complication rate, no significant difference was seen in either the number of severe complications of Accordion Severity Classification ≥3 or in the length of hospital stay. A laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection in elderly patients, especially those aged 75 years or older, is safe and feasible.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Evaluation of Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection Among Elderly Individuals With Colorectal Malignancy: A Single-center Retrospective Analysis
Yanru Zhang, Tufeng Chen, Xiaofeng Yang, Yiquan Li, Purun Lei
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2024; 34(3): 281. CrossRef
Risk Factors for Postoperative Paralytic Ileus in Advanced-age Patients after Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Retrospective Study of 124 Consecutive Patients
Takaaki Fujimoto, Tatsuya Manabe, Kumpei Yukimoto, Yasuhiro Tsuru, Hiroshi Kitagawa, Keiichiro Okuyama, Shin Takesue, Keita Kai, Hirokazu Noshiro
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2023; 7(1): 30. CrossRef
Laparoscopic rectal cancer resection yields comparable clinical and oncological results with shorter hospital stay compared to open access: a 5-year national cohort
Elisabeth Myrseth, Petter Fosse Gjessing, Linn Såve Nymo, Hartwig Kørner, Jan Terje Kvaløy, Stig Norderval
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Effect of intraoperative blood loss on postoperative complications and prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer: A meta‑analysis
Zi-Wei Li, Xin-Peng Shu, Ze-Lin Wen, Fei Liu, Xu-Rui Liu, Quan Lv, Xiao-Yu Liu, Wei Zhang, Dong Peng
Biomedical Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Lower conversion rate with robotic assisted rectal resections compared with conventional laparoscopy; a national cohort study
Elisabeth Myrseth, Linn Såve Nymo, Petter Fosse Gjessing, Hartwig Kørner, Jan Terje Kvaløy, Stig Norderval
Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(5): 3574. CrossRef
Age and comorbidities do not affect short-term outcomes after laparoscopic rectal cancer resection in elderly patients. A multi-institutional cohort study in 287 patients
Roberto Peltrini, Nicola Imperatore, Filippo Carannante, Diego Cuccurullo, Gabriella Teresa Capolupo, Umberto Bracale, Marco Caricato, Francesco Corcione
Updates in Surgery.2021; 73(2): 527. CrossRef
Perioperative and oncologic outcomes in young and octogenarian patients with colorectal cancer: a comparison at the extremes
Dedrick Kok Hong Chan, Sze Wai Leong, Christopher Hang Liang Keh
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2021; 406(7): 2399. CrossRef
Decreasing Postoperative Pulmonary Complication Following Laparoscopic Surgery in Elderly Individuals with Colorectal Cancer: A Competing Risk Analysis in a Propensity Score–Weighted Cohort Study
Yih-Jong Chern, Jeng-Fu You, Ching-Chung Cheng, Jing-Rong Jhuang, Chien-Yuh Yeh, Pao-Shiu Hsieh, Wen-Sy Tsai, Chun-Kai Liao, Yu-Jen Hsu
Cancers.2021; 14(1): 131. CrossRef
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly aged over 80 years old versus non-elderly: a retrospective cohort study
Yoshitake Ueda, Norio Shiraishi, Takahide Kawasaki, Tomonori Akagi, Shigeo Ninomiya, Hidefumi Shiroshita, Tsuyoshi Etoh, Masafumi Inomata
BMC Geriatrics.2020;[Epub] CrossRef
Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly versus non-elderly: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Nobuaki Hoshino, Yudai Fukui, Koya Hida, Yoshiharu Sakai
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2019; 34(3): 377. CrossRef
Outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for pT3/pT4 colorectal cancer in young vs. old patients
Gabriele Bellio, Marina Troian, Arianna Pasquali, Nicolò de Manzini
Minerva Chirurgica.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Long-term outcomes of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection in elderly patients
Yoshifumi Takahashi, Ken-ichi Mizuno, Kazuya Takahashi, Hiroki Sato, Satoru Hashimoto, Manabu Takeuchi, Masaaki Kobayashi, Junji Yokoyama, Yuichi Sato, Shuji Terai
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2017; 32(4): 567. CrossRef
Results of surgical treatment of colorectal cancer in nonagenarian patients
Arthur Manoel Braga de Albuquerque Gomes, Fábio Lopes de Queiroz, Rodrigo de Almeida Paiva
Journal of Coloproctology.2017; 37(04): 285. CrossRef
Evaluation of short-term outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients aged over 75 years old: a multi-institutional study (YSURG1401)
Keisuke Kazama, Toru Aoyama, Tsutomu Hayashi, Takanobu Yamada, Masakatsu Numata, Shinya Amano, Mariko Kamiya, Tsutomu Sato, Takaki Yoshikawa, Manabu Shiozawa, Takashi Oshima, Norio Yukawa, Yasushi Rino, Munetaka Masuda
BMC Surgery.2017;[Epub] CrossRef
Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiation in Elderly Patients
Je-Min Choi, Seung-Hun Lee, Seung-Hyun Lee, Byung-Kwon Ahn
The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2017; 20(3): 108. CrossRef
Elderly patients have more infectious complications following laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery
C. L. Kvasnovsky, K. Adams, M. Sideris, J. Laycock, A. K. Haji, A. Haq, J. Nunoo‐Mensah, S. Papagrigoriadis
Colorectal Disease.2016; 18(1): 94. CrossRef
Laparoscopic surgery for patients with colorectal cancer produces better short‐term outcomes with similar survival outcomes in elderly patients compared to open surgery
Soo Yun Moon, Sohee Kim, Soo Young Lee, Eon Chul Han, Sung‐Bum Kang, Seung‐Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park, Jae Hwan Oh
Cancer Medicine.2016; 5(6): 1047. CrossRef
Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer in the elderly: A prospective cohort study
Katsuji Tokuhara, Kazuyoshi Nakatani, Yosuke Ueyama, Kazuhiko Yoshioka, Masanori Kon
International Journal of Surgery.2016; 27: 66. CrossRef
Impact of intraoperative blood loss on morbidity and survival after radical surgery for colorectal cancer patients aged 80 years or older
Ryosuke Okamura, Koya Hida, Suguru Hasegawa, Yoshiharu Sakai, Madoka Hamada, Masayoshi Yasui, Takao Hinoi, Masahiko Watanabe
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2016; 31(2): 327. CrossRef
Is laparoscopic surgery really effective for the treatment of colon and rectal cancer in very elderly over 80 years old? A prospective multicentric case–control assessment
Francesco Roscio, Luigi Boni, Federico Clerici, Paolo Frattini, Elisa Cassinotti, Ildo Scandroglio
Surgical Endoscopy.2016; 30(10): 4372. CrossRef
Age Over 80 is a Possible Risk Factor for Postoperative Morbidity After a Laparoscopic Resection of Colorectal Cancer
Taekhyun Kang, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Ho-Kyung Chun, Won Kon Han, Kyung Uk Jung
Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(6): 228. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search