Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Original Articles

Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Colorectal cancer,Functional outcome,Surgical technique

Oncological and functional outcomes of transanal total mesorectal excision in a teaching hospital in the Netherlands: Joost A.G. van der Heijden, Kelly G.H. van de Pas, Frank J.C. van den Broek, Francois M.H. van Dielen, Gerrit D. Slooter, Adriana J.G. Maaskant-Braat; Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(1):28-35. Published online June 29, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.00773.0110

7,596 View
154 Download
11 Web of Science
11 Citations

Purpose
Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) was developed to overcome surgical difficulties experienced in distal pelvic dissection. Concerns have been raised about potential worse postoperative functional outcomes after TaTME. Also, the oncological safety was questioned. This study aimed to describe the functional, surgical, oncological outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after TaTME.
Methods
All consecutive TaTME cases for rectal cancer without disseminated disease between December 2016 and April 2019 were included. The Wexner incontinence score, low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score, fecal incontinence-related QoL, and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-core questionnaire and 29-item module (EORTC QLQ-C30/CR29) were collected. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate local recurrence-free survival.
Results
Thirty patients were eligible for analysis of which 23 received questionnaires. Response rate was 74%. After a median follow-up of respectively 20.0 and 23.0 months for functional and oncological outcomes, the median (interquartile range) of Wexner incontinence and LARS scores were 9.0 (7.0–12.0) and 33.1 (25.0–39.0). Major LARS was present in 73.3%. Fecal incontinence, general and colorectal-specific QoL subdomains that are associated with poor bowel function scored in line with previously reported data. The 2-year actuarial cumulative local recurrence rate was 3.7% (95% confidence interval, 2.4%–5.0%).
Conclusion
TaTME may lead to significant functional impairments. Patients should receive preoperative counseling on this topic and be fully aware of the potential consequences of their treatment. Oncological data were in line with other short- to moderate-term data and did not show alarming results.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Does transanal total mesorectal excision (taTME) result in better quality of life and functional outcomes than traditional TME does? A retrospective propensity score-adjusted cohort study
Yanic Ammann, Marie Klein, Lukas Marti, Rene Warschkow, Lennard Ströse, Moritz Sparn, Tarkan Jäger, Stephan Bischofberger, Walter Brunner
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Anorectal and urogenital functional outcome after robotic and transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis
Pak Chiu Wong, Felix Che Lok Chow, Wai Lun Law, Chi Chung Foo
Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304. CrossRef
Beyond survival: a comprehensive review of quality of life in rectal cancer patients
Won Beom Jung
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 527. CrossRef
Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341. CrossRef
Surgical Techniques for Transanal Local Excision for Early Rectal Cancer
Gyoung Tae Noh
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
How Can We Improve the Tumor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer?
Jeonghee Han
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Quality of life and functional outcomes after transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer—results from the implementation period in Denmark
M. X. Bjoern, F. B. Clausen, M. Seiersen, O. Bulut, F. Bech-Knudsen, J. E. Jansen, I. Gögenur, M. F. Klein
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(9): 1997. CrossRef
Analgesic effect of structured anal skin care for perianal dermatitis after low anterior resection in the rectal cancer patients: prospective, single-center, open-label, therapeutic confirmatory, randomized clinical trial
Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Mi Sook Yun, Jung-Hea Youn, Hong Min An, Kyung Hee Kim, Seung Mi Yeo, Bokyung Ku, Myeong Suk Kwon, Kun Hyung Kim
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(6): 360. CrossRef
Surgical Treatment of Low-Lying Rectal Cancer: Updates
Cristopher Varela, Nam Kyu Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 395. CrossRef
Functional outcomes after sphincter-preserving surgeries for low-lying rectal cancer: A review
Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
Precision and Future Medicine.2021; 5(4): 164. CrossRef

Anorectal Manometry Versus Patient-Reported Outcome Measures as a Predictor of Maximal Treatment for Fecal Incontinence: Lisa Ramage, Shengyang Qiu, Zhu Yeap, Constantinos Simillis, Christos Kontovounisios, Paris Tekkis, Emile Tan; Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(6):319-326. Published online December 31, 2019; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.10.16

6,669 View
72 Download
5 Web of Science
9 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
This study aims to establish the ability of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and anorectal manometry (ARM) in predicting the need for surgery in patients with fecal incontinence (FI).
Methods
Between 2008 and 2015, PROMs data, including the Birmingham Bowel and Urinary Symptoms Questionnaire (BBUSQ), Short Form 36 (SF-36), Wexner Incontinence Score and ARM results, were prospectively collected from 276 patients presenting with FI. Spearman rank was used to assess correlations between specific PROMs questions and ARM assessments of sphincter motor function. Binomial regression analyses were performed to identify factors predictive of the need for surgery. Finally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to establish the utility of individual ARM and PROMs variables in predicting the need for surgical intervention in patients with FI.
Results
Two hundred twenty-eight patients (82.60%) were treated conservatively while 48 (17.39%) underwent surgery. On univariate analyses, all 4 domains of the BBUSQ, all 8 domains of the SF-36, and the Wexner Incontinence Score were significant predictors of surgery. Additionally, maximum resting pressure, 5-second squeeze endurance, threshold volume, and urge volume were significant. On ROC curve analyses, the only significant ARM measurement was the 5-second squeeze endurance. PROMs, such as the incontinence domain of the BBUSQ and five of the SF-36 domains, were identified as fair discriminators of the need for surgery.
Conclusion
PROMs are reliable predictors of maximal treatment in patients with FI and can be readily used in primary care to aid surgical referrals and can be applied in hospital settings as an aid to guide surgical treatment decisions.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Primary Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase‐Positive Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor of the Small Bowel Detected by Capsule Endoscopy: A Case Report
Tomoyuki Niwa, Yasushi Hamaya, Yusuke Asai, Tatsuhiro Ito, Satoru Takahashi, Shunya Onoue, Satoshi Osawa, Mayu Sakata, Hiroya Takeuchi, Ken Sugimoto
DEN Open.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Capturing Patient Reported Outcomes Following Treatment of Benign Anorectal Disease Requires Significant Surgeon Commitment: Do Surgeons Really Want to Know?
Thomas Peponis, Marc S. Rubin, Ronald Bleday, Harrison T. Hubbell, Robert N. Goldstone, Joel E. Goldberg, Khawaja F. Ahmed, Liliana G. Bordeianou
World Journal of Colorectal Surgery.2025; 14(1): 1. CrossRef
Clinical Grade of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries and Prediction of Mode of Birth Recommendations: A 20‐Year Retrospective Analysis
Nicola Adanna Okeahialam, Ranee Thakar, Abdul H. Sultan
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology.2025; 132(12): 1802. CrossRef
Correlation of Digital Rectal Examination and Anorectal Manometry with Patient-Reported Outcomes Among Women with Fecal Incontinence
Alayne Markland, Mary Ackenbom, Uduak Andy, Ben Carper, Eric Jelovsek, Douglas Luchristt, Shawn Menefee, Rebecca Rogers, Vivian Sung, Donna Mazloomdoost, Maria Gantz
International Urogynecology Journal.2024; 35(12): 2367. CrossRef
Pelvic floor investigations for anal incontinence: Are they useful to predict outcomes from conservative treatment?
Karina Cuinas, Linda Ferrari, Carlene Igbedioh, Deepa Solanki, Andrew Williams, Alexis Schizas, Alison Hainsworth
Neurourology and Urodynamics.2023; 42(5): 1122. CrossRef
Anorectal dysfunction in multiple sclerosis patients: A pilot study on the effect of an individualized rehabilitation approach
Martina Kovari, Jan Stovicek, Jakub Novak, Michaela Havlickova, Sarka Mala, Andrew Busch, Pavel Kolar, Alena Kobesova
NeuroRehabilitation.2022; 50(1): 89. CrossRef
Postpartum fecal incontinence. State of the problem
D.R. Markaryan, A.M. Lukyanov, T.N. Garmanova, M.A. Agapov, V.A. Kubyshkin
Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2022; (6): 127. CrossRef
Functional outcomes after sphincter-preserving surgeries for low-lying rectal cancer: A review
Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
Precision and Future Medicine.2021; 5(4): 164. CrossRef
Usefulness of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures and Anorectal Physiologic Tests in Predicting Clinical Outcome for Fecal Incontinence
Chang-Nam Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2019; 35(6): 289. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search