Purpose Pelvic floor injury diagnosis using 3-dimensional (3D) pelvic floor ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging is unfeasible in many clinics. We assessed the efficacy of a novel diagnostic parameter, the anal canal coronal-sagittal (CS) ratio, for pelvic floor injury on 2D transanal ultrasound.
Methods This retrospective study analyzed the data of 126 female patients who underwent 3D pelvic floor ultrasound (including 2D transanal ultrasound) at a pelvic floor center between August and December 2020. The anal canal CS ratio on 2D transanal ultrasound and pelvic floor avulsion injury measurements were recorded for all patients.
Results A cutoff anal canal CS ratio of 1.15 was obtained using receiver operating characteristic analysis (sensitivity, 0.820; specificity, 0.763; and area under the curve, 0.838). Patients were categorized into the anal canal CS ratio ≥1.15 and the anal canal CS ratio <1.15 groups. Bilateral pelvic floor avulsion was more common in the anal canal CS ratio ≥1.15 group (n=35, 56.5%), and the incidence of pelvic floor avulsion was significantly different between the 2 groups (P=0.001). Existing parameters of pelvic floor injury, including minimal levator hiatus (P=0.001), levator plate descent angle (P=0.001), and levator ani deficiency score (P=0.001), were statistically different between the 2 groups.
Conclusion The anal canal CS ratio was an efficient novel parameter that indirectly detected pelvic floor injury in 2D transanal ultrasound. It is a potential alternative indicator for pelvic floor injury on the widely popular 2D transanal ultrasound.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Enhancing Nonpharmacological Analgesia Pathways: Considerations for Post-Hemorrhoidectomy Care Hui Zhang, Hong Lu Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2025; 68(11): e1894. CrossRef
Purpose The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D) pelvic floor ultrasonography and compare it with defecography in assessment of posterior pelvic disorders.
Methods Eligible patients were consecutive women undergoing 3D pelvic floor ultrasonography at one hospital between August 2017 and February 2019. All 3D pelvic floor ultrasonography was performed by one examiner. A total of 167 patients with suspected posterior pelvic disorder was retrospectively enrolled in the study. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the main symptoms.
Results There were 82 rectoceles on defecography (55 barium trapping) and 84 on 3D pelvic floor ultrasonography. Each modality identified 6 enteroceles. There were 43 patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia on defecography and 41 on ultrasonography. There were 84 patients with intussusception on defecography and 41 on 3D pelvic floor ultrasonography. Agreement of the 2 diagnostic tests was confirmed using Cohen’s kappa value. Rectocele (kappa, 0.784) and enterocele (kappa, 0.654) both indicated good agreement between defecography and 3D pelvic floor ultrasonography. In addition, pelvic floor dyssynergia (kappa, 0.406) showed moderate agreement, while internal intussusception (kappa, 0.296) had fair agreement.
Conclusion This study showed good agreement for detection of posterior pelvic disorders between defecography and 3D pelvic floor ultrasonography.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Can we use integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound as a screening tool in defaecatory pelvic floor dysfunction? A prospective evaluation of the accuracy of integrated total pelvic floor ultrasound compared with defaecation proctography Charlotte Ralston, Max Reena, Deepa Solanki, Samantha Morris, Alexis M. P. Schizas, Andrew B. Williams, Alison J. Hainsworth Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical value of transperineal ultrasound in evaluating the diagnostic grade of rectocele in Chinese women with obstructed defecation syndrome: An observational study Yunlin Jiang, Zhimin Fan, Ling Gao, Guangshu Shen, Jingjing Yue, Xiaofeng Wang, Xueping Zheng, Yahong Xue Medicine.2024; 103(36): e39259. CrossRef
Rectal prolapse and surgery for faecal incontinence Judith Johnston, Athur Harikrishnan Surgery (Oxford).2023; 41(7): 449. CrossRef
Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in MR-guided focused ultrasound ablation on uterus fibroids: lesion selection and assessment of ablative effects Wen Luo, Pei-di Zhang, Xiao Yang, Jian-min Zheng, Ying Liu, Xing Tang, Hai-jing Liu, Lei Ding, Li-na Pang, Xiao-dong Zhou, Li-wen Liu, Min-wen Zheng European Radiology.2022; 32(3): 2110. CrossRef
Colonic pseudo-obstruction in a patient with dyssynergic defecation: A case report Yejun Jeong, Yongjae Kim, Wonhyun Kim, Seoyeon Park, Su-Jin Shin, Eun Jung Park International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2022; 98: 107524. CrossRef
Is It a Refractory Disease?- Fecal Incontinence; beyond
Medication Chungyeop Lee, Jong Lyul Lee The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Three-Dimensional Pelvic Floor Ultrasound Assessment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse: Minimal Levator Hiatus and Levator Ani Deficiency Score Yongwoo Yune, Hong Yoon Jeong, Duk Hoon Park, Jong Kyun Lee Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(5): 291. CrossRef
Pelvic floor disorders are of interest to many surgeons who specialize in organ systems within this region. Colorectal surgeons are especially interested in disorders of the posterior compartment, which may broadly be divided into defecation disorders and fecal incontinence. These disorders distress patients socially and psychologically and greatly impair their quality of life. The underlying anatomical and pathophysiological changes are complex, are often incompletely understood, and cannot always be determined.
However, over the past decades, advances in the understanding of these disorders, together with rational methods of evaluation in anorectal physiology laboratories, radiology studies, and new surgical techniques, have led to promising results. This review summarizes the evaluation and treatment strategies, as well as the recent updates on the clinical and the therapeutic aspects of pelvic floor disorders.