Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Original Article

Outcomes of a Single-Port Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using a Glove Port With a Percutaneous Organ-Holding Device and Commercially-Available Multichannel Single-Port Device: Jieun Lee, Sung Ryol Lee, Hyung Ook Kim, Byung Ho Son, Wonjun Choi; Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(1):42-46. Published online February 28, 2014; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.1.42

5,253 View
43 Download
8 Web of Science
7 Citations

Purpose

A laparoscopic appendectomy is now commonly performed. The push in recent years toward reducing the number of ports required to perform this surgery has led to the development of a single-port laparoscopic appendectomy (SPA). We compared postoperative pain after an SPA using a glove port with a percutaneous organ-holding device (group 1) with that of an SPA using a commercially-available multichannel single-port device (group 2).

Methods

Between March 2010 and July 2011, a retrospective study was conducted of a total of 77 patients who underwent an SPA by three surgeons at department of surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Medical Center. Thirty-eight patients received an SPA using a glove port with a percutaneous organ-holding device. The other 39 patients received an SPA using a commercially-available multichannel single port (Octo-Port or SILS Port). Operative details and postoperative outcomes were collected and evaluated.

Results

There were no differences in the mean operative times, times to pass gas, postoperative hospital stays, or cosmetic satisfaction scores between the two groups. The pain score in the first 24 hours after surgery was higher in group 2 than group 1 patients (P < 0.001). Furthermore, the trocar used in group 2 was more expensive than that used in group 1.

Conclusion

An SPA using a glove port with a percutaneous organ-holding device was associated with a lower pain score during the first 24 hours after surgery because of the shorter fascia incision length and a cheaper cost than an SPA using a commercially-available multichannel single-port device.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Single port surgery in pediatric age: report of first 300 cases
Nicola ZAMPIERI, Elettra VESTRI, Federica BIANCHI, Marta PERETTI, Simone PATANÈ, Mariangela CECCHETTO, Alberto MANTOVANI, Annamaria GIAMBANCO, Fabiana FARINA, Gabriella SCIRÈ, Francesco S. CAMOGLIO
Minerva Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
A brief overview of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy as an optimal surgical procedure for patients with acute appendicitis: still a long way to go
Yang Chen, Zongqi Fan, Xiaoxin Zhang, Xinao Fu, Jushang Li, Jieqing Yuan, Shigang Guo
Journal of International Medical Research.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Laparoscopic Appendectomy Using the Surgical-Glove Port Through an Umbilical Incision: A Single-Center Retrospective Study
Tran Que Son, Tran Hieu Hoc, Vu Duc Long, Tran Thanh Tung, Nguyen Minh Tuan, Bui Minh Hue, Nguyen Van Minh, Nguyen Toan Thang
Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
The use of expanding ports in laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery may cause more pain: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Jannie Dressler, Lars N. Jorgensen
Surgical Endoscopy.2017; 31(11): 4400. CrossRef
Two-port laparoscopic anterior resection through a self-made glove device versus conventional laparoscopic anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparison of short-term surgical results
Hong Zhang, Yunzhi Ling, Jinchun Cong, Mingming Cui, Dingsheng Liu, Chunsheng Chen
World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
The learning curve of single-port laparoscopic appendectomy performed by emergent operation
YongHun Kim, WooSurng Lee
World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
Needlescopic-Assisted Surgery: Single-Incision or Multi-Incision Laparoscopic Surgery?
Chang-Nam Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(1): 9. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search