Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Original Article

Laparoscopic Posterolateral Rectopexy for the Treatment of Patients With a Full Thickness Rectal Prolapse: Experience With 63 Patients and Short-term Outcomes: Keehoon Hyun, Shi-Jun Yang, Ki-Yun Lim, Jong-Kyun Lee, Seo-Gue Yoon; Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(3):119-124. Published online June 30, 2018; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.01.31

8,847 View
188 Download
5 Web of Science
5 Citations

Purpose
Although numerous procedures have been proposed for the treatment of patients with a rectal prolapse, the most effective operation has not yet been established. Minimal rectal mobilization can prevent constipation; however, it is associated with increased recurrence rates. We describe our novel method for a laparoscopic posterolateral rectopexy, which includes rectal mobilization with a posterior-right unilateral dissection, suture fixation to the sacral promontory with a polypropylene mesh (Optilene), and a mesorectal fascia propria that is as wide as possible. The present report describes our novel method and assesses the short-term outcomes of patients.
Methods
Between June 2014 and June 2017, 63 patients (28 males and 35 females) with a full-thickness rectal prolapse underwent a laparoscopic posterolateral (LPL) rectopexy. We retrospectively analyzed the clinical characteristics and postoperative complications in those patients. The outcome of surgery was determined by evaluating the answers on fecal incontinence questionnaires, the results of anal manometry preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively, the patients’ satisfaction scores (0–10), and the occurrence of constipation.
Results
No recurrence was reported during follow-up (3.26 months), and 3 patients reported postoperative complications (wound infection, postoperative sepsis, which was successfully treated with conservative management, and retrograde ejaculation). Compared to the preoperative baseline, fecal incontinence at three months postoperatively showed an overall improvement. The mean patient satisfaction score was 9.55 ± 0.10, and 8 patients complained of persistent constipation.
Conclusion
LPL rectopexy is a safe, effective method showing good functional outcomes by providing firm, solid fixation for patients with a full-thickness rectal prolapse.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Anatomical and functional outcomes of rectal prolapse treatment with laparoscopic pelvic organ prolapse suspension versus laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy
Adel Zeinalpour, Alimohammad Bananzadeh, Mohammad Mostafa Safarpour, Sara Shojaei‐Zarghani, Seyede Saeideh Shahidinia, Seyed Vahid Hosseini, Ali Reza Safarpour
Surgical Practice.2025; 29(1): 26. CrossRef
Surgical outcomes on health-related quality of life in rectal prolapse: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Hannaneh Yousefi-Koma, Yassin Rahnama, Dorsa Najari, Fatemeh Fathabadi, Mojtaba Sedaghat, Alireza Kazemeini, Mohammad Reza Keramati, Amir Keshvari, Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli, Behnam Behboudi, Seyed Mohsen Ahmadi-Tafti
Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical outcomes of surgical management for recurrent rectal prolapse: a multicenter retrospective study
Kwang Dae Hong, Keehoon Hyun, Jun Won Um, Seo-Gue Yoon, Do Yeon Hwang, Jaewon Shin, Dooseok Lee, Se-Jin Baek, Sanghee Kang, Byung Wook Min, Kyu Joo Park, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Heung-Kwon Oh, Min Hyun Kim, Choon Sik Chung, Yong Geul Joh
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 102(4): 234. CrossRef
Laparoscopic Posterolateral Suture Rectopexy for Recurrent Rectal Prolapse in Children
Sherif M. Shehata, Ahmed A. Elhaddad, Wael M. Abo Senna, Mohamed A. Shehat
Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2019; 29(10): 1292. CrossRef
Changing Trend of Rectal Prolapse Surgery in the Era of the Minimally Invasive Surgery
Suk-Hwan Lee
The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2019; 22(4): 135. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search