Purpose Traditionally, fasting from midnight has been a standard practice in elective surgery for reduce the risk of aspiration. However, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) programs recommend clear fluid intake until 2 hours before anesthesia. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and patient satisfaction of preoperative carbohydrate drink intake until 2 hours before colorectal cancer surgery.
Methods Sixty patients who underwent colorectal cancer surgery between April 2021 and February 2023 at Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center were enrolled. This study included 30 patients who fasted from midnight (nothing by mouth [NPO] group) and 30 patients who consumed a high concentration of complex carbohydrate fluids (New Care NO-NPO) until 2 hours before surgery (No-NPO group). Patient satisfaction was assessed using a visual analog scale. Perioperative and postoperative outcomes were compared.
Results Basic characteristics of patients were similar for the 2 groups. The No-NPO group had a significantly higher patient satisfaction score than the NPO group (3.7 vs. 2.2, P=0.040). Scores of operative difficulty, operation time, blood loss, postoperative recovery parameters, and postoperative complication rates were similar for the 2 groups. Pathological outcomes were also comparable. No mortality occurred in either group.
Conclusion High-concentration carbohydrate fluid intake until 2 hours before induction of anesthesia could improve patient satisfaction without increasing postoperative complications, demonstrating its safety and feasibility in colorectal cancer surgery.
Trial registration CRIS (cris.nih.go.kr) identifier: KCT0011323.
Purpose The hinotori Surgical Robot System (hereafter “hinotori”) is a novel platform for robot-assisted surgery, while the da Vinci Surgical System (“da Vinci”) remains the field standard. This study compared short-term surgical outcomes of rectal cancer surgery between these systems using propensity score–matched analysis.
Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted of 209 consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery with the da Vinci and 58 patients with the hinotori system. After 2:1 propensity score matching, 108 da Vinci and 54 hinotori cases were included. Surgical outcomes, including operative time, blood loss, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and pathological findings, were compared.
Results After matching, the baseline demographics were well balanced between groups. The hinotori system was associated with significantly longer operative time (266 minutes vs. 227 minutes, P=0.014) and console time (156 minutes vs. 110 minutes, P=0.001). However, estimated blood loss and postoperative complication rate did not differ significantly. Pathological findings, including the number of lymph nodes retrieved and the incidence of positive surgical margins, were comparable between systems.
Conclusion In rectal surgery, the hinotori system demonstrates comparable short-term safety outcomes to da Vinci. Despite longer operative times and limited integrated instrumentation, hinotori‐assisted procedures may be feasible in selected patients. Further research should address long-term oncological outcomes and strategies to improve procedural efficiency.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Racing toward the future of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: a comparative study of hinotori and da Vinci Sung Uk Bae Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(4): 259. CrossRef
Purpose Colorectal cancer (CRC) often spreads to the liver, necessitating surgical treatment for CRC liver metastasis (CRLM). Iron-deficiency anemia is common in CRC patients and is associated with fatigue and weakness. This study investigated the effects of iron-deficiency anemia on the outcomes of surgical resection of CRLM.
Methods This population-based, retrospective study evaluated data from adults ≥20 years old with CRLM who underwent hepatic resection. All patient data were extracted from the 2005–2018 US National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. The outcome measures were in-hospital outcomes including 30-day mortality, unfavorable discharge, and prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS), and short-term complications such as bleeding and infection. Associations between iron-deficiency anemia and outcomes were determined using logistic regression analysis.
Results Data from 7,749 patients (representing 37,923 persons in the United States after weighting) were analyzed. Multivariable analysis revealed that iron-deficiency anemia was significantly associated with an increased risk of prolonged LOS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 2.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.30–3.30), unfavorable discharge (aOR, 2.42; 95% CI, 1.83–3.19), bleeding (aOR, 5.05; 95% CI, 2.92–8.74), sepsis (aOR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.04–2.46), pneumonia (aOR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.72–3.74), and acute kidney injury (aOR, 1.71; 95% CI, 1.24–2.35). Subgroup analyses revealed consistent associations between iron-deficiency anemia and prolonged LOS across age, sex, and obesity status categories.
Conclusion In patients undergoing hepatic resection for CRLM, iron-deficiency anemia is an independent risk factor for prolonged LOS, unfavorable discharge, and several critical postoperative complications. These findings underscore the need for proactive anemia management to optimize surgical outcomes.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A commentary on “Individualized blood pressure regulation and acute kidney injury in older patients having major abdominal surgery: a pilot randomized trial” Fu-Shan Xue, Dan-Feng Wang, Xiao-Chun Zheng International Journal of Surgery.2025; 111(12): 9993. CrossRef
Purpose Postoperative pain is a major concern for patients undergoing ultrasound scalpel-assisted hemorrhoidectomy, potentially exacerbated by delayed wound healing. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of an intimate cleansing gel containing chlorhexidine, hyaluronic acid, and other anti-inflammatory agents (Antroclean Fisioderm) on postoperative pain, itching, and wound healing in patients who had undergone this procedure.
Methods This multicenter observational case-control study involved a cohort of consecutive adult patients who underwent hemorrhoidectomy using an ultrasound device. The study compared 2 different postoperative wound management strategies over 1 month after surgery: washing with warm water twice per day (control group) versus a 2-minute topical application of intimate cleansing gel (Antroclean Fisioderm) followed by a warm water wash (intervention group).
Results The median postoperative pain score was significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group at each follow-up point (P<0.01). The percentage of patients reporting anal itching was also significantly lower in the intervention group than in the control group at each follow-up point (P<0.01). All patients in the intervention group achieved complete wound healing 4 weeks after surgery, compared to 88 (82%) in the control group (P<0.01). No adverse events were reported.
Conclusion The topical application of intimate cleansing gel (Antroclean Fisioderm) twice daily for 1 month following ultrasound scalpel-assisted hemorrhoidectomy appears to be associated with faster healing, reduced pain, decreased itching, and improved quality of life, without any adverse effects. Further larger and prospective randomized trials are recommended to confirm these findings.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Enhancing Proctological Outcomes: The Role of Hyaluronic Acid in Hemorrhoid Care – An Innovative Adjunct to Surgery Riddhi Upadhyay, Akshat Vadaliya, Haryax V. Pathak, Soham Upadhyay Journal of Coloproctology.2025; 45(03): 001. CrossRef
Purpose Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) reduces postoperative complications (POCs) after colorectal surgery; however, its impact on the management of POCs remains unclear. This study compared the diagnosis and management of POCs before and after implementing our ERAS protocol after laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer and examined the short- and mid-term oncologic impacts.
Methods This single-center, retrospective study evaluated all consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic colectomy for cancer between 2012 and 2021, focusing on the incidence of POCs within 90 days. We compared outcomes before (standard group) and after (ERAS group) the implementation of our ERAS protocol in January 2016.
Results Significantly fewer patients in the ERAS group developed POCs (standard vs. ERAS, 136 of 380 patients [35.8%] vs.136 of 660 patients [20.6%]; P<0.01). The ERAS group had a significantly shorter mean total length of stay after POCs (13.1 days vs. 11.4 days, P=0.04), and the rates of life-threatening complications (6.7% vs. 0.7%) and 1-year mortality (7.4% vs. 1.5%) were significantly lower in the ERAS group than in the standard group. Among patients with anastomotic complications, laparoscopic reoperation was significantly more common in the ERAS group than in the standard group (8.3% vs. 75.0%, P<0.01). Among patients with postoperative ileus, the diagnosis and recovery times were significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the standard group, resulting in a shorter total length of stay (13.5 days vs. 10 days, P<0.01).
Conclusion The implementation of an ERAS protocol did not eliminate all POCs, but it did accelerate their diagnosis and management and improved patient outcomes.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Less is more: simplifying patient-centered cancer care In Ja Park Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(3): 173. CrossRef
Research Progress on the Application of ERAS Concept in the Perioperative Period of Colorectal Cancer Patients 梦云 孙 Advances in Clinical Medicine.2025; 15(08): 1208. CrossRef
Can Surgical Approach and Postoperative Factors Impact Survival in Rectal Cancer? Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Insights Ahmed Abdelsamad, Seyidali Mirzazada, Karsten Ridwelski, Mohamad Nour Nasif, Florian Gebauer Cancer Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Optimizing postoperative pain management in minimally invasive colorectal surgery Soo Young Lee Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 525. CrossRef
Purpose Despite advances in neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and anal sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer, bowel dysfunction is still unavoidable and negatively affects patients’ quality of life. In this longitudinal study, we aimed to investigate the changes in bowel function with follow-up time and the effect of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on bowel function following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Methods In this study, 171 patients with upper or middle rectal cancer who underwent low anterior resection between 2012 and 2018 were included. Bowel function was assessed longitudinally with Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center Bowel Function Instrument and Wexner scores every 6 months after restoration of bowel continuity. Patients with at least 2 follow-up visits were included.
Results Overall, 100 patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Urgency, soilage, and fecal incontinence were noted within 24 months in the patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. After 2 years of follow-up, significant bowel dysfunction and fecal incontinence were observed in the neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy group. Low tumor level and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were associated with delayed bowel dysfunction.
Conclusion Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in combination with low tumor level was significantly associated with delayed bowel dysfunction even after 2 years of follow-up. Therefore, careful selection and discussion with patients are paramount.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Funktionelle Folgen von Radiotherapie, Chemotherapie und Operation bei der Behandlung des Rektumkarzinoms Philipp Rhode, Matthias Mehdorn, Undine Gabriele Lange, Sebastian Murad Rabe, Johannes Quart, Robert Nowotny, Patrick Sven Plum, Stefan Niebisch, Sigmar Stelzner Zentralblatt für Chirurgie - Zeitschrift für Allgemeine, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie.2025; 150(04): 353. CrossRef
Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis Jae Seung Kim, Jaram Lee, Hyeung-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4280. CrossRef
Beyond survival: a comprehensive review of quality of life in rectal cancer patients Won Beom Jung Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 527. CrossRef
Anastomotic and rectal stump leaks are feared complications of colorectal surgery. Diverting stomas are commonly used to protect low rectal anastomoses but can have adverse effects. Studies have reported favorable outcomes for transanal drainage devices instead of diverting stomas. We describe our use of the Heald anal stent and its potential impact in reducing anastomotic or rectal stump leak after elective or emergency colorectal surgery. We performed a single-center retrospective analysis of patients in whom a Heald anal stent had been used to “protect” a colorectal anastomosis or a rectal stump, in an elective or emergency context, for benign and malignant pathology. Intraoperative and postoperative outcomes were reviewed using clinical and radiological records. The Heald anal stent was used in 93 patients over 4 years. Forty-six cases (49%) had a colorectal anastomosis, and 47 (51%) had an end stoma with a rectal stump. No anastomotic or rectal stump leaks were recorded. We recommend the Heald anal stent as a simple and affordable adjunct that may decrease anastomotic and rectal stump leak by reducing intraluminal pressure through drainage of fluid and gas.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Techniques in coloproctology – controversies in coloproctology resection: rectopexy is an underutilised procedure in the management of both symptomatic high-grade internal and external rectal prolapse J. Bunni, E. D. Courtney Techniques in Coloproctology.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose Protective ileostomy and colostomy are performed in patients undergoing low anterior resection with a high leakage risk. We aimed to compare surgical, medical, and daily care complications between these 2 ostomies in order to make individual choice.
Methods Patients who underwent low anterior resection for rectal tumors with protective stomas between January 2011 and September 2018 were enrolled. Stoma-related complications were prospectively recorded by wound, ostomy, and continence nurses. The cancer stage and treatment data were obtained from the Taiwan Cancer Database of our Big Data Center. Other demographic data were collected retrospectively from medical notes. The complications after stoma creation and after the stoma reversal were compared.
Results There were 176 patients with protective colostomy and 234 with protective ileostomy. Protective ileostomy had higher proportions of high output from the stoma for 2 consecutive days than protective colostomy (11.1% vs. 0%, P<0.001). Protective colostomy resulted in more stoma retraction than protective ileostomy (21.6% vs. 9.4%, P=0.001). Female, open operation, ileostomy, and carrying stoma more than 4 months were also significantly associated with a higher risk of stoma-related complications during diversion. For stoma retraction, the multivariate analysis revealed that female (odds ratio [OR], 4.00; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.13–7.69; P<0.001) and long diversion duration (≥4 months; OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.22–4.43; P=0.010) were independent risk factors, but ileostomy was an independent favorable factor (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22–0.72; P=0.003). The incidence of complication after stoma reversal did not differ between colostomy group and ileostomy group (24.3% vs. 20.9%, P=0.542).
Conclusion We suggest avoiding colostomy in patients who are female and potential prolonged diversion when stoma retraction is a concern. Otherwise, ileostomy should be avoided for patients with impaired renal function. Wise selection and flexibility are more important than using one type of stoma routinely.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Gut microbiome and plasma metabolome alterations in ileostomy and after closure of ileostomy Liang Xu, Xiaolong Li, Lang Chen, Haitao Ma, Ying Wang, Wenwen Liu, Anyan Liao, Liang Tan, Xiao Gao, Weidong Xiao, Hua Yang, Guangyan Ji, Yuan Qiu, Wei-Hua Chen, Qin Liu, Song Liu, Yang Yang Microbiology Spectrum.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Effect of one-stitch method of temporary ileostomy on the surgical outcomes and complications after laparoscopic low anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a propensity score matching analysis Xin-Peng Shu, Jia-Liang Wang, Zi-Wei Li, Fei Liu, Xu-Rui Liu, Lian-Shuo Li, Yue Tong, Xiao-Yu Liu, Chun-Yi Wang, Yong Cheng, Dong Peng European Journal of Medical Research.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The Differences in Postoperative Nursing Between Temporary Ileostomy and Temporary Colostomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study Mei Wang, Lihong Dai, Xia Fang, Yan Zheng, Yuanhao Shen, Yang Yu Nursing Open.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Preventive intestinal stoma: ileostomy, colostomy. Which option is safer? (meta-analysis and systematic review) Yu. A. Elfimova, R. I. Fayzulin, S. V. Chernyshov, E. G. Rybakov Koloproktologia.2025; 24(4): 152. CrossRef
Uso de ileostomía derivativa en cáncer de ovario. Revisión de la literatura Franco Rafael Ruiz-Echeverría, Pedro Hernando Calderón-Quiroz, Juliana Rendón-Hernández Revista Colombiana de Cirugía.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Meta-analysis: loop ileostomy versus colostomy to prevent complications of anterior resection for rectal cancer Shilai Yang, Gang Tang, Yudi Zhang, Zhengqiang Wei, Donglin Du International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
The Role of Colon in Isolated Intestinal Transplantation: Description of 4 Cases Pierpaolo Di Cocco, Giulia Bencini, Alessandro Martinino, Egor Petrochenkov, Stepan Akshelyan, Kentaro Yoshikawa, Mario Spaggiari, Jorge Almario-Alvarez, Ivo Tzvetanov, Enrico Benedetti, Gaetano Gallo International Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose The aim of this study was to evaluate whether longer compression time before firing the stapler reduced the postoperative complications related to staple line formation in stapled hemorrhoidopexy.
Methods This retrospective case-control study was conducted at a colorectal-anal specialty hospital. Consecutive patients with grades III and IV hemorrhoids who underwent stapled hemorrhoidopexy between January 2016 and November 2019 were included. According to the compression time, patients were assigned to the long compression time group (2 minutes) or the typical compression time group (30 seconds). The primary outcome measure was incidence of staple line complications such as dehiscence, bleeding, and stenosis.
Results A total of 348 patients treated with stapled hemorrhoidopexy were evaluated. Seventy-three and 275 patients were included in the long compression time group and the typical compression time group, respectively. No significant differences were observed in patient characteristics between the groups. However, additional procedures were performed more frequently in the typical compression time group (78.1% vs. 92.0%, P=0.001). Bleeding occurred more frequently in the typical compression time group (1.4% vs. 8.4%, P=0.030). The rates of dehiscence and stenosis were not significantly different between the groups. Fecal urgency developed more frequently in the typical compression time group (0% vs. 5.1%, P=0.040). In logistic regression analysis, typical compression time (30 seconds) was the only risk factor for bleeding (odds ratio, 8.496; P=0.040).
Conclusion Longer compression time was associated with a decreased incidence of postoperative bleeding after stapled hemorrhoidopexy.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Latest Research Trends on the Management of Hemorrhoids Sung Il Kang Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2025; 9(2): 179. CrossRef
Purpose We sought to identify the risk factors for prolonged hospitalization and delayed treatment completion after laparoscopic appendectomy in patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis.
Methods The study retrospectively analyzed 497 patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomies for uncomplicated appendicitis between January 2018 and December 2020. The patients were divided into an early discharge group (≤2 days) and a late discharge group (>2 days) based on the length of hospital stay (LOS). The patients were also divided into uneventful and complicated groups according to the need for additional treatment after standard follow-up.
Results Thirty-seven patients (7.4%) were included in the late discharge group. The mean LOS of the late discharge groups was 3.9 days. There were significant differences according to age, preoperative C-reactive protein (CRP), and operative time between the 2 groups. Only operative time was significantly associated with prolonged LOS in multivariate analysis. Thirty-five patients (7.0%) were included in the complicated group. The mean duration of treatment in the uneventful and complicated groups was 7.4 and 25.3 days, respectively. Significant differences existed between the uneventful and complicated groups in preoperative body temperature, preoperative CRP levels, maximal appendix diameter, and the presence of appendicoliths. In multivariate analysis, preoperative CRP levels and maximal appendix diameter were independent predictors of delayed treatment completion.
Conclusion Shorter operative time is desirable to ensure minimal hospital stay in patients with uncomplicated appendicitis. Further efforts are needed to ensure that patients with uncomplicated appendicitis do not experience delayed treatment completion after laparoscopic appendectomies.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Association between preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and length of stay in pediatric patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy: a retrospective cohort study Ming Liu, Yunpeng Gou, Ping Yang BMC Pediatrics.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparative Outcomes of Immediate and Delayed Wound Closure Techniques in Appendectomies for Gangrenous Appendicitis Anzar Usman, Esha Akbar, Aliha Mukhtar, Iqra Nasir, Usama Rehman, Adil Iqbal, Muhammad Umar Umar DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICO-LIFE-SCIENCES.2024; 1(3): 18. CrossRef
Non-linear association between C-reactive protein levels and length of stay in pediatric appendicitis patients undergoing laparoscopic appendectomy Ming Liu, Ping Yang, Yunpeng Gou Frontiers in Pediatrics.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Nomogram prediction model for length of hospital stay following laparoscopic appendectomy in pediatric patients: a retrospective study Ming Liu, Ping Yang, Yunpeng Gou, Qiang Chen, Dong Xu Frontiers in Pediatrics.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Purpose Single-port laparoscopic techniques can be optimized with confined incisions. This approach has an intraoperative advantage of excellent visualization of the correct intestinal segment for exteriorization, along with direct visual control of the extraction to avoid twisting. However, only a few studies have verified the efficacy of the technique. Thus, this study assessed the results of single-port laparoscopic stoma creation for fecal diversion, specifically focusing on feasibility, safety, and efficacy.
Methods Patients who underwent single-incision enterostomy performed by a single surgeon were included. Data on demographics, indications for and chosen procedure, and operation results were retrospectively collected and analyzed.
Results Between April 2015 and January 2018, a total of 13 patients (8 males, 5 females) with a mean age of 57.7 years (range, 41–83 years) underwent single-port ileostomy creation. The most common reason for diversion was palliative ileostomy for colon obstruction or fistula from peritoneal malignancy (n = 12), followed by colonic fistula with necrotizing pancreatitis (n = 1). There were no cases of conversion to open or multiport laparoscopic surgery. The mean operative time was 54 minutes (range, 37–118 minutes), and the median length of hospital stay was 8 days (range, 2–211 days). A postoperative complication, aspiration pneumonia, was documented in 1 patient and treated conservatively. The mean duration of bowel movement was 0.7 days (range, 0–4 days). All stomas had good function, and there was no 30-day mortality.
Conclusion Single-port laparoscopic ileostomy in patients with a palliative setting could be a safe and feasible option for fecal diversion.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Single port–assisted diverting ileostomy formation for anastomotic leakage after low anterior resection Kyong-Min Kang, Heung-Kwon Oh, Hong-min Ahn, Hye-Rim Shin, Min-Hyeong Jo, Mi-Jeong Choi, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2025; 28(1): 47. CrossRef
Comparison between liquid skin adhesive and wound closure strip for skin closure after subcuticular suturing in single-port laparoscopic appendectomy: a single-center retrospective study in Korea Kyeong Eui Kim, Yu Ra Jeon, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2024; 27(1): 14. CrossRef
Purpose Upfront systemic chemotherapy with target agents has been recommended for patients with stage IV colon cancer. Some with partial response are considered for curative resection. There is high risk of developing postoperative complications following upfront systemic chemotherapy. We aimed to evaluate short-term perioperative outcomes of curative surgery after upfront chemotherapy in comparison with upfront surgery in patients with metastatic colon cancer.
Methods Between January 2010 and October 2015, 146 patients (80 in the surgery first group, 66 in the upfront chemotherapy group) who underwent surgical resection before or after systemic chemotherapy for metastatic colon cancer were included in the present study. All decisions for treatment were made through a multidisciplinary team. Postoperative clinical outcomes and complications were analyzed to compare the groups.
Results There was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of postoperative clinical outcomes. Overall complication rates were not different between the groups (surgery first group: 46.3% vs. upfront chemotherapy group: 60.6%; P = 0.084). When classified according to the Clavien-Dindo method, there was no difference between the 2 groups in terms of major complications (grade 3 or more) (surgery first group: 18.9% vs. upfront chemotherapy group: 27.5%; P = 0.374).
Conclusion There was no significant increase in major postoperative complications in metastatic colon cancer patients who received upfront chemotherapy followed by curative surgery. Careful patient selection and treatment planning are important.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Impact of preoperative chemotherapy on perioperative morbidity in combined resection of colon cancer and liver metastases Joy Z. Done, Angelos Papanikolaou, Miloslawa Stem, Shannon N. Radomski, Sophia Y. Chen, Chady Atallah, Jonathan E. Efron, Bashar Safar Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 27(11): 2380. CrossRef
Treatment for Peritoneal Metastasis of Patients With Colorectal Cancer Young Jin Kim, Chang Hyun Kim Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 425. CrossRef
Purpose The impact of postoperative complications on long-term oncologic outcome after radical colorectal cancer surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the risk factors and oncologic outcomes of surgery-related postoperative complication groups.
Methods From January 2010 to December 2010, 310 patients experienced surgery-related postoperative complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery. These stage I–III patients were classified into 2 subgroups, minor (grades I, II) and major (grades III, IV) complication groups, according to extended Clavien-Dindo classification system criteria. Clinicopathologic differences between the 2 groups were analyzed to identify risk factors for major complications. The diseasefree survival rates of surgery-related postoperative complication groups were also compared.
Results Minor and major complication groups were stratified with 194 patients (62.6%) and 116 patients (37.4%), respectively. The risk factors influencing the major complication group were pathologic N category and operative method. The prognostic factors associated with disease-free survival were preoperative perforation, perineural invasion, tumor budding, and receiving neoadjuvant therapy. With a median follow-up period of 72.2 months, the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 84.4% in the minor group and 78.5% in the major group, but there was no statistical significance between the minor and major groups (P = 0.392).
Conclusion Advanced cancer and open surgery were identified as risk factors for increased surgery-related major complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery. However, severity of postoperative complications did not affect disease-free survival from colorectal cancer.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Oncologic impact of technical difficulties during the early experience with laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: long-term follow-up results of a prospective cohort study Hong-min Ahn, Tae Gyun Lee, Hye-Rim Shin, Jeehye Lee, In Jun Yang, Jung Wook Suh, Heung-Kwon Oh, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang Current Problems in Surgery.2025; 63: 101694. CrossRef
Impact of Preoperative and Intraoperative Factors on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A 10-Year Retrospective Study Lucian Flavius Herlo, Ioana Golu, Alexandra Herlo, Claudia Raluca Balasa Virzob, Ionescu Alin, Stela Iurciuc, Ionut Eduard Iordache, Luana Alexandrescu, Doina Ecaterina Tofolean, Raluca Dumache Diseases.2025; 13(1): 16. CrossRef
Surgical management of mucinous adenocarcinoma arising in perianal fistula: A case series Saeed Derakhshani, Milad Karimian Ghadim, Abolfazl Salari, Mohammadreza Ghahari Surgery Open Science.2025; 26: 1. CrossRef
Organ/space surgical site infection and long-term outcomes of rectal cancer surgery: retrospective population-based cohort study Carlota Matallana, Paula Manchon-Walsh, Eloy Espín, Marta Pascual, Sebastiano Biondo, Marta Jiménez-Toscano, Josep Maria Borràs, Josep M Badia, Enric Limón, Luisa Aliste, Rebeca Font, Miguel Pera BJS Open.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Accelerated enhanced recovery after colon cancer surgery with discharge within one day after surgery: a systematic review Misha A. T. Sier, Anke H. C. Gielen, Thaís T. T. Tweed, Noémi C. van Nie, Tim Lubbers, Jan H. M. B. Stoot BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Risk Factors of Postoperative Complication and Hospital Mortality after Colorectal Perforation Surgery Kensuke Kudou, Shuhei Kajiwara, Takashi Motomura, Takafumi Yukaya, Tomonori Nakanoko, Yosuke Kuroda, Masahiro Okamoto, Tadashi Koga, Yo-Ichi Yamashita Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2024; 8(2): 118. CrossRef
Predictive value of POSSUM scoring system for postoperative complications and mortality in elderly patients with colorectal cancer Qiang Li, Yingjun Lu Technology and Health Care.2024; 32(6): 4653. CrossRef
Postoperative Complications Result in Poor Oncological Outcomes: What Is the Evidence? Anjana Wajekar, Sohan Lal Solanki, Juan Cata, Vijaya Gottumukkala Current Oncology.2024; 31(8): 4632. CrossRef
The role of robotic-assisted surgery in the management of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Chenxiong Zhang, Hao Tan, Han Xu, Jiaming Ding International Journal of Surgery.2024; 110(10): 6282. CrossRef
Effect of postoperative complications on 5-year survival following laparoscopic surgery for resectable colorectal cancer: a retrospective study Jae Eun Lee, Kyeong Eui Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek, Sung Uk Bae International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery in Rectal Cancer: Analysis of Medium-Term Oncological Outcomes Jing-jing Li, Zhi-bo Zhang, Shi-yun Xu, Cheng-ren Zhang, Xiong-fei Yang, Yao-xing Duan Surgical Innovation.2023; 30(1): 36. CrossRef
Do postoperative infectious complications really affect long‐term survival in colorectal cancer surgery? A multicenter retrospective cohort study Akihisa Matsuda, Hiroshi Maruyama, Shinji Akagi, Toru Inoue, Kenichiro Uemura, Minako Kobayashi, Hisanori Shiomi, Manabu Watanabe, Hiroki Arai, Yutaka Kojima, Yusuke Mizuuchi, Hajime Yokomizo, Yuji Toiyama, Toru Miyake, Yasuyuki Yokoyama, Kei Ishimaru, Sh Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2023; 7(1): 110. CrossRef
International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment Audrius Dulskas, Philip F. Caushaj, Domas Grigoravicius, Liu Zheng, Richard Fortunato, Joseph W. Nunoo-Mensah, Narimantas E. Samalavicius Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(4): 307. CrossRef
Effect of serum lactate dehydrogenase-to-albumin ratio (LAR) on the short-term outcomes and long-term prognosis of colorectal cancer after radical surgery Xin-Peng Shu, Ying-Chun Xiang, Fei Liu, Yong Cheng, Wei Zhang, Dong Peng BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Modified Clavien–Dindo–sink classification system for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Ndéye F. Guissé, Joseph D. Stone, Lukas G. Keil, Tracey P. Bastrom, Mark A. Erickson, Burt Yaszay, Patrick J. Cahill, Stefan Parent, Peter G. Gabos, Peter O. Newton, Michael P. Glotzbecker, Michael P. Kelly, Joshua M. Pahys, Nicholas D. Fletcher Spine Deformity.2022; 10(1): 87. CrossRef
Surgical site infection after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer is associated with compromised long-term oncological outcome Nana Sugamata, Takashi Okuyama, Emiko Takeshita, Haruka Oi, Yuhei Hakozaki, Shunya Miyazaki, Musashi Takada, Takashi Mitsui, Takuji Noro, Hideyuki Yoshitomi, Masatoshi Oya World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Does Preoperative Waiting Time Affect the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer Patients? A Retrospective Study from the West of China Xiao-Yu Liu, Zi-Wei Li, Bing Kang, Yu-Xi Cheng, Wei Tao, Bin Zhang, Hua Zhang, Zheng-Qiang Wei, Dong Peng, Antonio Giovanni Solimando Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 2022: 1. CrossRef
Surgical safety in the COVID-19 era: present and future considerations Young Il Kim, In Ja Park Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 102(6): 295. CrossRef
Current status and role of robotic approach in patients with low-lying rectal cancer Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(1): 1. CrossRef
Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer Sung Uk Bae Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 577. CrossRef
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, and Current Management Seung Mi Yeo, Gyung Mo Son The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Current Status and Future of Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer-An English Version Sung Uk Bae Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 221. CrossRef
A propensity score-matched analysis of advanced energy devices and conventional monopolar device for colorectal cancer surgery: comparison of clinical and oncologic outcomes Woo Jin Song, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(5): 290. CrossRef
Purpose Stoma takedown is a frequently performed procedure with considerable postoperative morbidities. Various skin closure techniques have been introduced to reduce surgical site infections. The aim of this study was to assess postoperative outcomes after stoma takedown during a long-term follow-up period.
Methods Between October 2006 and December 2015, 84 consecutive patients underwent a colostomy or ileostomy takedown at our institution. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were analyzed through retrospective reviews of medical records.
Results The proportion of male patients was 60.7%, and the mean age of the patients was 59.0 years. The overall complication rate was 28.6%, with the most common complication being prolonged ileus, followed by incisional hernia, anastomotic leakage, surgical site infection, anastomotic stenosis, and entero-cutaneous fistula. The mean follow-up period was 64.3 months. The univariate analysis revealed no risk factors related to overall complications or prolonged ileus.
Conclusion The postoperative clinical course and long-term outcomes following stoma takedown were acceptable. Stoma takedown is a procedure that can be performed safely.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Complicated diverticulitis: Diagnostic precision and surgical solutions in a patient with chronic kidney disease Sharon L. Hsieh, Nathaniel Grabill, Mena Louis, Bradley Kuhn Radiology Case Reports.2025; 20(1): 346. CrossRef
Comparing Surgical Site Infection Rate Between Primary Closure and Rhomboid Flap After Stoma Reversal Che-Ming Chu, Chih-Cheng Chen, Yu-Yao Chang, Kai-Jyun Syu, Shih-Lung Lin Annals of Plastic Surgery.2024; 92(1S): S33. CrossRef
TIMING OF THE STOMA REVERSAL, WHAT IS THE SAFE PERIOD?: A RETROSPECTIVE OBSERVATIONAL STUDY GIRIDHAR ASHWATH, ESHWAR KATHIRESAN MANASIJAN, ANTHONY P ROZARIO Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research.2024; : 181. CrossRef
Diverting ileostomy in benign colorectal surgery: the real clinical cost analysis F. Ascari, G. Barugola, G. Ruffo Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(5): 1761. CrossRef
Laparoscopic versus open Hartmann reversal: a propensity score matching analysis Li Tan, Xiao-Yu Liu, Bin Zhang, Lian-Lian Wang, Zheng-Qiang Wei, Dong Peng International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Defunctioning stoma in anterior resection for rectal cancer does not impact anastomotic leakage: a national population-based cohort study Eihab Munshi, Marie-Louise Lydrup, Pamela Buchwald BMC Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Surgical Site Infection After Stoma Reversal: A Comparison Between Linear and Purse-String Closure Muhammad Awais Khan, Khurram Niaz, Shahzeb Asghar, Maaz A Yusufi, Mohtamam Nazir, Syed Muhammad Ali, Aryan Ahmed, Akeel Ahamed Salahudeen, Talha Kareem Cureus.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Factors Predicting the Reversal of Hartmann’s Procedure Ömer Yalkın, Fatih Altıntoprak, Mustafa Yener Uzunoğlu, Yasin Alper Yıldız, Muhammet Burak Kamburoğlu, Necattin Fırat, Fehmi Çelebi, Mihajlo Jakovljevic BioMed Research International.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Rumi Shin, Sang Mok Lee, Beonghoon Sohn, Dong Woon Lee, Inho Song, Young Jun Chai, Hae Won Lee, Hye Seong Ahn, In Mok Jung, Jung Kee Chung, Seung Chul Heo
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(6):221-227. Published online December 31, 2016
An intestinal perforation is a rare condition, but has a high mortality rate, even after immediate surgical intervention. The clinical predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality are still not well established, so this study attempted to identify risk factors for postoperative morbidity and mortality after surgery for an intestinal perforation.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 117 patients who underwent surgery for an intestinal perforation at a single institution in Korea from November 2008 to June 2014. Factors related with postoperative mortality at 1 month and other postoperative complications were investigated.
Results
The mean age of enrolled patients was 66.0 ± 15.8 years and 66% of the patients were male. Fifteen patients (13%) died within 1 month after surgical treatment. Univariate analysis indicated that patient-related factors associated with mortality were low systolic and diastolic blood pressure, low serum albumin, low serum protein, low total cholesterol, and high blood urea nitrogen; the surgery-related factor associated with mortality was feculent ascites. Multivariate analysis using a logistic regression indicated that low systolic blood pressure and feculent ascites independently increased the risk for mortality; postoperative complications were more likely in both females and those with low estimated glomerular filtration rates and elevated serum C-reactive protein levels.
Conclusion
Various factors were associated with postoperative clinical outcomes of patients with an intestinal perforation. Morbidity and mortality following an intestinal perforation were greater in patients with unstable initial vital signs, poor nutritional status, and feculent ascites.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Emergency physician ultrasound diagnosis of pneumoperitoneum in intraoperative patients with peritoneal insufflation Amy Sanghvi, Makoto Tanigawa, Michael Danta, Jeff Yang, Mohammad Hamshow, Errel Khordipour, Lawrence Haines, Leily Naraghi The American Journal of Emergency Medicine.2025; 90: 120. CrossRef
Prognostic determinants in surgical critial patients undergoing emergency surgery for Stage III or higher colorectal cancer Hyun Ho Kim, Sanguk Hwang, Jinbeom Cho Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Advances in natural biomacromolecule-based Janus materials: preparation, applications and future prospects in food science Ying Xu, Xuan Tao, Liubin Li, Yao Chen, Rong He, Xingrong Ju, Zhigao Wang Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition.2025; : 1. CrossRef
Instruction Video for Endosponge Construction JC Chen, Vijay Raj, Syed Husain Videoscopy.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Marine predator strikes rectally inserted eel fish causing colonic perforation: a rare case report and review of literature Akash Saha, Mohammad Mashiur Rahman, Abidur Rahman, Israt Jahan, Faisal Nasim Sunny, Md. Imran Ahmed, A. M. Zubayed Hassan Annals of Medicine & Surgery.2025; 87(12): 8909. CrossRef
A sharp plant stem causing terminal ileal perforation with clinical presentation resembling acute appendicitis: a case report Pirada Yincharoen, Weeratian Tawanwongsri Frontiers in Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
In Situ 4D Printing of Polyelectrolyte/Magnetic Composites for Sutureless Gastric Perforation Sealing Yunsong Shi, Sihan Tang, Xi Yuan, Zhuofan Li, Shifeng Wen, Zhongwei Li, Bin Su, Chunze Yan, Lili Chen Advanced Materials.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Small Intestinal Perforation after 360-Degree Liposuction: A Case Report Jenna C. Bekeny, Samuel S. Huffman, Chris Thomas, Mariana Tumminello, Anna Kata, Rajiv Parikh, Laura K. Tom, Grant M. Kleiber Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.2024; 48(5): 946. CrossRef
Issues of informed consent for non-specialists conducting colorectal cancer screenings Forrest Bohler, Allison Garden Journal of Osteopathic Medicine.2024; 124(1): 39. CrossRef
Prevalence, Pattern, Mortality, and Morbidity of Traumatic Small Bowel Perforation at King Abdulaziz Medical City: A Retrospective Cohort Study Fahad Aljehaiman, Faisal J Almalki, Abdulah Alhusain, Faris Alsalamah, Khaled Alzahrani, Abdulkareem Alharbi, Hani Alkhulaiwi Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Abdominal pain after a food crawl Danier Ong, Rajiv Yogendran, Emily Fite Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians Open.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Case of abdominal whirl sign with small bowel obstruction and free gas successfully managed by conservative management instead of laparoscopic surgery Giuleta Jamsari, James Wei Tatt Toh Laparoscopic, Endoscopic and Robotic Surgery.2024; 7(3): 128. CrossRef
Emergent Esophagectomy in Patients with Esophageal Malignancy Is Associated with Higher Rates of Perioperative Complications but No Independent Impact on Short-Term Mortality Yahya Alwatari, Devon C. Freudenberger, Jad Khoraki, Lena Bless, Riley Payne, Walker A. Julliard, Rachit D. Shah, Carlos A. Puig Journal of Chest Surgery.2024; 57(2): 160. CrossRef
Urea to Albumin Ratio Is an Excellent Predictor of Death in Patients With Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections Evgeni Dimitrov, Krasimira Halacheva, Georgi Minkov, Emil Enchev, Yovcho Yovtchev Surgical Infections.2024; 25(3): 225. CrossRef
Postoperative Complications in Emergency Surgeries at a Referral Hospital in Eastern Venezuela Victor Castañeda-Marquez, Yeisson Rivero-Moreno, Enrique Avila-Liendo, Gabriel Gonzalez-Quinde, Wilson Garcia-Cazorla, Georcimar Mendez-Meneses, Yoalkris E Salcedo, Tamara Rodriguez-Rugel, Jackner Antigua-Herrera, Miguel Rivas-Perez, Silvia Agudelo-Mendoz Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Gastrointestinal tract perforation after radiofrequency ablation for hepatic tumor: Incidence and risk factors Kyowon Gu, Tae Wook Kang, Seungchul Han, Dong Ik Cha, Kyoung Doo Song, Min Woo Lee, Hyunchul Rhim, Go Eun Park European Journal of Radiology.2024; 177: 111560. CrossRef
Revisiting Physiological and Operative Severity Score for the Enumeration of Mortality and Morbidity (POSSUM) and Portsmouth-POSSUM (P-POSSUM) Scores: Are They Valid in Cases of Ileal Perforation? Saikrishna Eswaravaka, Chirantan Suhrid, Bhavya Rao, Sundaresh Prabhakar, Jayashri Pandya Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
A giant trichobezoar in a child with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A case report M. Forooghi, R. Shahrokhi, Sh. Yousufzai International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2024; 123: 110283. CrossRef
Factors related to cardiac rupture after acute myocardial infarction Xue Gao, Ying Guo, Xiaoting Zhu, Chunlei Du, Beibei Ma, Yinghua Cui, Shuai Wang Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Investigating the association between osteopenia and bowel perforation through a multicenter radiologic analysis Sebastian Sanduleanu, Koray Ersahin, Jonathan Kottlors, Johannes Bremm, Narmin Talibova, Tim Damer, Merve Erdogan, Nils Groβe Hokamp, Lukas Goertz, Nijat Nasirov, Vilayat Valiyev, Christiane Bruns, David Maintz, Nuran Abdullayev Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Case report: Migratory biliary stent resulting in sigmoid colon perforation Jasmine B Beloy, Nicholas P Lund, Annika M Van Hell, Shyam Allamaneni Journal of Surgical Case Reports.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic factors in patients with gastrointestinal perforation under the acute care surgery model : a retrospective cohort study Kiyoung Sung, Sanguk Hwang, Jaeheon Lee, Jinbeom Cho BMC Surgery.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Characteristics, treatment, and outcome of patients with bowel perforation after immune checkpoint inhibitor exposure Antonio Pizuorno Machado, Malek Shatila, Cynthia Liu, Yang Lu, Mehmet Altan, Isabella C. Glitza Oliva, Dan Zhao, Hao Chi Zhang, Anusha Thomas, Yinghong Wang Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2023; 149(9): 5989. CrossRef
Abdominal emergency surgery in patients with hematological malignancies: a retrospective single-center analysis Philipp H. von Kroge, Anna Duprée, Oliver Mann, Jakob R. Izbicki, Jonas Wagner, Paymon Ahmadi, Sören Weidemann, Raissa Adjallé, Nicolaus Kröger, Carsten Bokemeyer, Walter Fiedler, Franziska Modemann, Susanne Ghandili World Journal of Emergency Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Acute Spontaneous Colonic Perforation in a Case of Newly Confirmed Scleroderma: Case Report Glenn Goodwin, Christian Ryckeley, Davide Fox, Michael Ashley, Laurence Dubensky, Mauricio Danckers, Todd Slesinger Interactive Journal of Medical Research.2023; 12: e43295. CrossRef
Surgical outcomes and prognostic factors associated with emergency left colonic surgery Dauda Bawa, Yasser Mohammad Khalifa, Saleem Khan, Waddah Norah, Nibras Noman Annals of Saudi Medicine.2023; 43(2): 97. CrossRef
Fatal Case of Perforated Cytomegalovirus Colitis: Case Report and Systematic Review Andrea T. Fisher, Kovi E. Bessoff, Veronica Nicholas, James Badger, Lisa Knowlton, Joseph D. Forrester Surgical Infections.2022; 23(2): 127. CrossRef
An adhesive and resilient hydrogel for the sealing and treatment of gastric perforation Jing Chen, Julia S. Caserto, Ida Ang, Kaavian Shariati, James Webb, Bo Wang, Xi Wang, Nikolaos Bouklas, Minglin Ma Bioactive Materials.2022; 14: 52. CrossRef
Predictors of mortality in patients with acute small-bowel perforation transferred to ICU after emergency surgery: a single-centre retrospective cohort study Jianzhang Wu, Ping Shu, Hongyong He, Haojie Li, Zhaoqing Tang, Yihong Sun, Fenglin Liu Gastroenterology Report.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Delayed ileal perforation following lollipop-stick ingestion in a two year old Tareq Swedan, Mohamed Morjan, Mulham Jarjanazi, Nafiza Martini, Alaa Aldin Ismail, Hebatullah Awad, Shamseh Benbash Journal of Pediatric Surgery Case Reports.2022; 81: 102276. CrossRef
The Clinical Significance of Shock Index and GFR in the Differential Diagnosis of Perforated Appendicitis Ferhat ÇAY, Ali DURAN Journal of Contemporary Medicine.2022; 12(4): 504. CrossRef
The Impact of Delayed Surgical Care on Patient Outcomes With Alimentary Tract Perforation: Insight From a Low-Middle Income Country Muhammad H Zafar, Taha A Zaka Ur Rehman, Muhammad Sohaib Khan, Shayan Ahmed, Amir Shariff Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Gangrene of the Colon Ascendens, Colon Transversum, and Lienal Flexure in a Massive Strangulated Umbilical Hernia Stanko Baco, Milos Mitric Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Facility of Origin Predicts Mortality After Colonic Perforation Samuel D. Butensky, Emma Gazzara, Gainosuke Sugiyama, Gene F. Coppa, Antonio Alfonso, Paul J. Chung The American Surgeon™.2021; 87(8): 1327. CrossRef
Effect of Malnutrition Assessed by Comprehensive Nutritional Screening Tool on In-Hospital Mortality after Surgery for Gastrointestinal Perforation Seung-Young Oh, Hannah Lee, Ho Geol Ryu, Hyuk-Joon Lee Surgical Metabolism and Nutrition.2021; 12(1): 1. CrossRef
Machine Learning-based Model for Predicting Postoperative Complications among Patients with Colonic Perforation: A Retrospective study Hiroka Hosaka, Masashi Takeuchi, Tomohiro Imoto, Haruka Yagishita, Ayaka Yu, Yusuke Maeda, Yosuke Kobayashi, Yoshie Kadota, Masanori Odaira, Fumiki Toriumi, Takashi Endo, Hirohisa Harada Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2021; 5(3): 274. CrossRef
Bevacizumab and gastrointestinal perforations: a review from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database Thomas A. Wichelmann, Sufyan Abdulmujeeb, Eli D. Ehrenpreis Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2021; 54(10): 1290. CrossRef
A Rare Presentation of Gastric Carcinoma With Gastric Perforation and Septic Shock Reem Moala AlHazmi, Dunya Nasrallah Alfaraj, Shaykhah Nasser AlNaimi, Sarah Mohammed AlQahtani, Mashael Hamed AlJuwayed, Hazem Mohammed Zakriea, Mohammed S Foula Cureus.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
C-Reactive Protein as a Marker of Postoperative Complication of Emergency Colorectal Surgery Luis R. M. Nadal, Artur M. A. da Silva, Larissa Johann, Shuaib H. El Boustani, Maria Beatriz A. S. Medrado, Jose F. M. Farah, Renato A. Lupinacci Journal of Coloproctology.2021; 41(04): 375. CrossRef
Modified frailty index and hypoalbuminemia as predictors of adverse outcomes in older adults presenting to acute general surgical unit Angela Abraham, Sally Burrows, Neelankal John Abraham, Bhaskar Mandal Revista Española de Geriatría y Gerontología.2020; 55(2): 70. CrossRef
Prognostic Factors and Management for Left Colonic Perforation: Can Hartmann’s Procedure Be Preventable? Yilseok Joo, Yujin Lee, Taeyoung Yoo, Jungbin Kim, Inseok Park, Geumhee Gwak, Hyunjin Cho, Keunho Yang, Kiwhan Kim, Byung-Noe Bae Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(3): 178. CrossRef
Intestinal Perforation: A Surgeon's Nightmare Enlightened by Scientific Research Byung Soh Min Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(6): 205. CrossRef
Appendicitis is the most common condition leading to an intra-abdominal operation for a non-obstetric problem in pregnancy. The aim of this study was to examine our experience and to analyze the clinical characteristics and the pregnancy outcomes for appendicitis during pregnancy that was reported in Korea.
Methods
We reported 25 cases of appendicitis during pregnancy that were treated at Good Moonhwa Hospital from January 2004 to March 2010. We also analyzed appendicitis during pregnancy reported in Korea between 1970 and 2008 by a review of journals.
Results
The incidence of acute appendicitis during pregnancy was one per 568 deliveries. The mean age was 27.92 years old, the gestational stage at the onset of symptoms was the first trimester in 10 patients (40%), the second trimester in 14 patients (56%), and the third trimester in 1 patient (4%). Among the 25 cases, 21 were treated with an open appendectomy and 4 with laparoscopic appendectomies. The postoperative complications were 2 wound infections and 1 spontaneous abortion.
Conclusion
Our experience demonstrated that appendectomies on pregnant patients can be successfully performed at secondary hospitals.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Diagnostic value of the pregnancy index for acute appendicitis in pregnant women Ismail Sezİklİ, Ramazan Topcu, Mehmet Berksun Tutan, Orhan Aslan, Mahmut Arif Yüksek Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Analyzing results of diagnostics and prediction of acute appendicitis in pregnant women: approaches to solving a well-known clinical problem Larisa A. Logvin, Dmitry N. Popov, Elena V. Kiseleva, Andrey Yu. Korolkov, Sergey F. Bagnenko Pediatrician (St. Petersburg).2025; 16(1): 35. CrossRef
Akut Apandisit Nedeniyle Opere Edilen Gebe Hastaların Sonuçları: 37 Vaka Serisinin Tek Merkez Deneyimi Felat Çiftçi, Mazlum Yavaş Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi.2024; 21(1): 36. CrossRef
Non-obstetric surgery during pregnancy and the effects on maternal and fetal outcomes: A systematic review Anna Haataja, Hannu Kokki, Outi Uimari, Merja Kokki Scandinavian Journal of Surgery.2023; 112(3): 187. CrossRef
PARAMETERS ASSOCIATED WITH ACUTE APPENDICITIS IN PREGNANCY Samet ŞAHİN, Eyüp Murat YILMAZ, Mahir KIRNAP, Ethem BİLGİÇ, Ahmet Ender DEMİRKIRAN SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi.2023; 30(2): 185. CrossRef
Efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging among pregnant patients diagnosed with acute abdomen in the emergency department Yunus YILMAZSOY, Adnan ÖZDEMİR, Serdar ARSLAN, Pelin Zeynep BEKİN SARIKAYA Anatolian Current Medical Journal.2023; 5(3): 187. CrossRef
Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis in pregnancy A.P. Ukhanov, D.V. Zakharov, S.A. Zhilin, S.V. Bolshakov, K.D. Muminov, Yu.A. Aselderov Pirogov Russian Journal of Surgery.2023; (9): 86. CrossRef
Significance of laboratory parameters in diagnosing acute appendicitis during pregnancy Rıfat Peksöz, Esra Dişçi, Abdulkadir Kaya, Enes Ağırman, Ercan Korkut, Nurhak Aksungur, Necip Altundaş, Salih Kara, Sabri Selçuk Atamanalp ANZ Journal of Surgery.2022; 92(1-2): 121. CrossRef
Physical Examination and Appendiceal Signs During Pregnancy Steven Yale, Halil Tekiner, Eileen S Yale Cureus.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Evaluation of Clinical and Paraclinical Findings in Cases of Pregnancy Appendectomy in Ali Ebn-e Abitaleb Hospital Within 2015 - 2019 Shahla Mirgaloy Bayat, Farahnaz Farzaneh, Zahra Asadi Kalameh, Najmeh Zamaniha Zahedan Journal of Research in Medical Sciences.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Acute Appendicitis During Pregnancy: A Case Series of 42 Pregnant Women Tezcan Akın, Birkan Birben, Gökhan Akkurt, Onur Karaca, Mustafa Dönmez, Sadettin Er, Mesut Tez Cureus.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Laparoscopic Versus Open Appendectomy for Appendicitis in Pregnancy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Qi Zeng, Amina Aierken, Shen-Sen Gu, Gang Yao, Shadike Apaer, Nuerzhatijiang Anweier, Jing Wu, Jin-Ming Zhao, Tao Li, Tuerhongjiang Tuxun Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2021; 31(5): 637. CrossRef
APPENDICITIS IN PREGNANCY : OUR CLINICAL EXPERIENCE AT A TERTIARY CARE CENTRE Anil Kumar, Rekha Rani, Hamid Wani GLOBAL JOURNAL FOR RESEARCH ANALYSIS.2021; : 22. CrossRef
The diagnostic role of hemogram parameters in pregnant appendicitis Erkan Somuncu, Emre Bozdag, inanc sarici, Adem Ozcan, Cenk Ozkan, Ceren Basaran Polish Journal of Surgery.2021; 94(1): 48. CrossRef
Optimization of Diagnosis of Acute Appendicitis in Pregnant Women Aydar Mindiarovich Ziganshin, Hiwa Mohammed Hassan Karkhani, Bhawna Sharma Indian Journal of Surgery.2020; 82(5): 941. CrossRef
Acute appendicitis during pregnancy A. V. Sazhin, A. I. Kirienko, M. A. Kurtser, A. G. Konoplyannikov, A. V. Panin, D. A. Son, G. D. Shulyak Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2019; (1): 70. CrossRef
Laparoscopic appendectomy versus open appendectomy for suspected appendicitis during pregnancy: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis Seung Hwan Lee, Jin Young Lee, Yoon Young Choi, Jae Gil Lee BMC Surgery.2019;[Epub] CrossRef
Complicated appendicitis during pregnancy A. V. Sazhin, M. A. Kurtser, A. G. Konoplyannikov, G. B. Ivakhov, A. V. Panin, D. A. Son, G. D. Shulyak, Yu. A. Serebrennikova Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2019; (4): 15. CrossRef
Outcomes after open and laparoscopic appendectomy during pregnancy: A meta-analysis Anastasia Prodromidou, Nikolaos Machairas, Ioannis D. Kostakis, Ernesto Molmenti, Eleftherios Spartalis, Athanasios Kakkos, Georgios T. Lainas, Georgios C. Sotiropoulos European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2018; 225: 40. CrossRef
Acute Appendicitis in Pregnancy and the Developing World Tika Ram Bhandari, Sudha Shahi, Sarita Acharya International Scholarly Research Notices.2017; 2017: 1. CrossRef
Appendicitis in pregnancy: Difficulties in diagnosis and management. Guidance for the emergency general surgeon: A systematic review Arkeliana Tase, Mohamad Fathul Aizat Kamarizan, Keshav Swarnkar International Journal of Surgery Open.2017; 6: 5. CrossRef
Maternal and Fetal Outcome in Pregnant Women with Acute Appendicitis: A Three Year Observational Study Alaa Masood Obstetrics & Gynecology International Journal.2016;[Epub] CrossRef
PURPOSE Understanding of early postoperative course is very important for planning of operation and postoperative management. However, reports regarding early postoperative complications following colorectal cancer surgery are rare.
The aim of this study was to report the incidence of immediate postoperative complications associated with colorectal cancer surgery. METHODS This prospective study examined clinicopathological data on 869 patients who underwent a resection for colorectal cancer between November 2002 and October 2003.
Patients who underwent a palliative stoma, bypass, or emergent operation were excluded. Early postoperative complications were defined as complications occurring within 30 days of surgery. The male-to-female ratio was 518:351, and the mean age was 59 (range, 18~90) years. RESULTS The tumor was located at right colon in 176, at left colon in 169, and at rectum in 510 patients. In 158 patients (18.2%), at least one postoperative complication occurred. The most common complication was ileus (5.5%), followed by wound complication (4.1%), the voiding disturbance (3.3%), anastomotic bleeding (1.4%), anastomotic leakage (1.1%), and bleeding (0.6%). The complication rate was 21.6% in patients with right colon cancer, 16% in those with left colon cancer, and 17.3% in those with rectal cancer. Ileus occurred on mean postoperative day 8 and required a mean of 12 days for resolution. The wound complications occurred on mean postoperative day 9 and were resolved after a mean of 10 days. Of the 8 anastomotic leakage patients, proximal stoma construction was required in 5 patients. Intra-luminal bleeding occurred most common in patients with right colon cancer. Higher frequency of postoperative complications occurred in male patients (P=0.008), patients older than 70 years (P=0.02), and patients with co-morbid medical conditions (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS The overall early postoperative complication rate following colorectal cancer surgery was 18.2%. The postoperative complication rate was higher in male, elderly, and patients with co-morbid medical conditions. Our results have allowed us to identify major complications and to better understand the postoperative course in patients undergoing colorectal cancer resections.
PURPOSE The purposes of this study are to determine the incidence of postoperative ileus after colorectal surgery, to analyze its clinical features, and to identify the risk factors for its development. METHODS We reviewed the cases of 263 patients with mechanical ileus among 3,237 patients who underwent colorectal surgery in our clinic between June 1989 and December 2000. RESULTS A total of 263 (8.1%) patients of postoperative ileus were documented, 193 (73.4%) cases occurred during the 1st. year. Postoperative ileus is influenced by the initial site of surgery; the rectum has more impact than the colon (P=0.028). The causes of postoperative ileus were adhesion, recurrence of cancer, and parastomal hernia. Adhesion (81.1%) was the most common cause of ileus, and cancer recurrence (18.0%) was the second. However, in postoperative ileus requiring surgery, cancer recurrence increased with time (2 year: 58.1%).
The cases receiving postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy presented a significant increase in the incidence of postoperative ileus (10.3% vs 6.7% P=0.01) and in the requirement for surgical treatment (4.6% vs 2.7%, P=0.04).
Patients with a temporary stoma presented a significant increase in the incidence of postoperative ileus than patients with a permanent stoma (P=0.001). The frequency of prior episodes of ileus was the strongest predictor of recurrence. CONCLUSIONS There is a high risk of adhesion-related problems after colorectal surgery. The risk factors are associated with rectal surgery, postoperative radiation therapy, and a temporary stoma.