Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
52 "Prognosis"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Display
Original Articles
Colorectal cancer
Oncologic outcomes and associated factors of colon cancer patients aged 70 years and older
Byeo Lee Lim, In Ja Park, Jun-Soo Ro, Young Il Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(3):198-206.   Published online August 5, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00367.0052
  • 6,726 View
  • 87 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
The aim of this study was to examine the prognosis and associated risk factors, including adjuvant chemotherapy (CTx), in elderly patients with colon cancer.
Methods
This retrospective study included patients who underwent radical resection for colon cancer between January 2010 and December 2014 at Asan Medical Center. The effects of stage, risk factors, and chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared in patients aged ≥70 and <70 years.
Results
Of 3,313 patients, 933 (28.1%) was aged ≥70 years. Of the 1,921 patients indicated for adjuvant CTx, 1,294 of 1,395 patients (92.8%) aged <70 years and 369 of 526 patients (70.2%) aged ≥70 years received adjuvant CTx. Old age (≥70 years) was independently associated with RFS in overall cohort. Among patients aged ≥70 years indicated for adjuvant CTx, the 5-year OS (81.6% vs. 50.4%, P<0.001) and RFS (82.9% vs. 67.4%, P=0.025) rates were significantly higher in those who did than did not receive adjuvant CTx. Additionally, adjuvant CTx was confirmed as independent risk factor of both OS and RFS in patients aged ≥70 years indicated for adjuvant CTx.
Conclusion
Old age was associated with poor RFS and adjuvant CTx had benefits in OS as well as RFS in elderly patients eligible for adjuvant CTx.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Immunological changes and recovery-related factors in older patients with colon cancer: A pilot trial
    Byeo Lee Lim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Yousun Ko, Kyung Won Kim, In Ja Park
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2025; 16(3): 102200.     CrossRef
  • Stage II-III colorectal cancer in geriatric patients: Clinicopathological features and chemotherapy utilization
    Yakup Duzkopru, Özlem Doğan
    Turkish Journal of Clinics and Laboratory.2025; 16(1): 118.     CrossRef
  • Does Oxaliplatin-based Adjuvant Therapy Benefit Older Colorectal Cancer Patients?
    Peter Hofland
    Onco Zine - The International Oncology Network.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Early detection of anastomotic leakage in colon cancer surgery: the role of early warning score and C-reactive protein
    Gyung Mo Son
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 415.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
    Jae Seung Kim, Jaram Lee, Hyeung-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
    Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4280.     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
Evaluating prognostic significance of preoperative C-reactive protein to albumin ratio in older patients with pathological stage II or III colorectal cancer
Koji Numata, Yukari Ono, Mihwa Ju, Shizune Onuma, Ayano Tanaka, Taichi Kawabe, Sho Sawazaki, Akio Higuchi, Kazuki Yamanaka, Shinsuke Hatori, Hiroyuki Saeki, Hiroshi Matsukawa, Yasushi Rino, Kazuyuki Tani
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(2):161-168.   Published online October 11, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00367.0052
  • 5,321 View
  • 154 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study was performed to evaluate the prognostic value of preoperative C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) in older patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) undergoing curative resection.
Methods
We retrospectively analyzed 244 older patients (aged 75 years or higher) with pathological stage II or III CRC who underwent curative surgery between 2008 and 2016. The optimal value of CAR was calculated and its correlation with the clinicopathological factors and prognosis was examined.
Results
The optimal cutoff value of the CAR was 0.085. High preoperative CAR was significantly associated with high carcinoembryonic antigen levels (P=0.001), larger tumor size (P<0.001), and pT factor (P=0.001). On multivariate analysis, high CAR was independent prognostic factor for relapse-free survival (P=0.042) and overall survival (P=0.001).
Conclusion
Preoperative elevated CAR could be considered as an adverse predictor of both relapse-free survival and overall survival in older patients with CRC undergoing curative surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio Is an Independent Risk Factor for Recurrence and Survival Following Curative Resection of Stage I–III Colorectal Cancer in Older Patients
    Tomoaki Bekki, Manabu Shimomura, Minoru Hattori, Saki Sato, Atsuhiro Watanabe, Sho Ishikawa, Kouki Imaoka, Kosuke Ono, Keiso Matsubara, Tetsuya Mochizuki, Shintaro Akabane, Takuya Yano, Hideki Ohdan
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(7): 4812.     CrossRef
  • Towards a Gradual Optimization of Oncologic Prognostic Factors in the Era of the Frail Patient: The Potential Role of Preoperative Inflammation and Nutritional Status
    Giuseppe Zimmitti
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(8): 4853.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic role of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio in cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis
    Menglu Dai, Wei Wu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The association of blood biomarkers with treatment response and adverse health outcomes in older patients with solid tumors: A systematic review
    Yara van Holstein, P. Janne E. van den Berkmortel, Stella Trompet, Diana van Heemst, Frederiek van den Bos, Marieke Roemeling-van Rhijn, Nienke A. de Glas, Marian Beekman, P. Eline Slagboom, Johanneke E.A. Portielje, Simon P. Mooijaart, Barbara C. van Mun
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2023; 14(7): 101567.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic prediction of colorectal cancer using the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio: the importance of inflammatory biomarkers and their association with long-term outcomes
    Chul Seung Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(4): 287.     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
Clinical impact of C-reactive protein to albumin ratio of the 7th postoperative day on prognosis after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery
Masahiro Kataoka, Kuniyuki Gomi, Ken Ichioka, Takuya Iguchi, Tomoki Shirota, Arano Makino, Ko Shimada, Kiyotomi Maruyama, Motohiro Mihara, Shoji Kajikawa
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(4):315-325.   Published online June 13, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00234.0033
  • 5,840 View
  • 87 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 7 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
C-reactive protein to albumin ratio (CAR) has been utilized as a prognostic factor in various carcinomas. We investigated the relationship between preoperative, postoperative day (POD) 1, and POD 7 CARs and the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).
Methods
Three hundred twenty patients with CRC who underwent laparoscopic radical resection between May 2011 and December 2016 were enrolled. Patients were selected into 2 groups, high CAR and low CAR (n=72/group), based on preoperative, POD 1, and POD 7 CARs. The relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between groups using propensity score matching.
Results
The high CAR group had a significantly worse RFS (P<0.001) and OS (P=0.002) at POD 7 than those in the low CAR group. However, in preoperative and POD 1 analysis, no differences were observed.
Conclusion
In patients with CRC, CAR of POD 7 was a significant prognostic factor.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The C-Reactive Protein Combination Ratios Outperform the Albumin-Globulin Ratio in Diagnosing Periprosthetic Joint Infection After Total Knee Arthroplasty
    Don H. Le, Jason M. Dayan, Anzar Sarfraz, Ran Schwarzkopf, Vinay Aggarwal, Alan J. Dayan
    The Journal of Arthroplasty.2025; 40(12): 3291.     CrossRef
  • Music therapy combined with anesthesia recovery care boosts anesthesia recovery in colorectal cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic radical resection
    Yan Zheng, Hai-Fang Ni, Yan Shi, Dan-Qian Cui, Zhen-Zhu Wu, Yu-Feng Ling, Shui-Qing He, Xiao-Yun Qin
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio Is an Independent Risk Factor for Recurrence and Survival Following Curative Resection of Stage I–III Colorectal Cancer in Older Patients
    Tomoaki Bekki, Manabu Shimomura, Minoru Hattori, Saki Sato, Atsuhiro Watanabe, Sho Ishikawa, Kouki Imaoka, Kosuke Ono, Keiso Matsubara, Tetsuya Mochizuki, Shintaro Akabane, Takuya Yano, Hideki Ohdan
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(7): 4812.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic impact of preoperative nutritional and immune inflammatory parameters on liver cancer
    Sung Uk Bae
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(2): 266.     CrossRef
  • Revisiting the diagnostic performance of exosomes: harnessing the feasibility of combinatorial exosomal miRNA profiles for colorectal cancer diagnosis
    Jin Sung Park, Jin Ah Choi, Da Han Hyun, Chorok Byeon, Sang Gyu Kwak, Jun Seok Park, Seonki Hong
    Discover Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
  • Applications of propensity score matching: a case series of articles published in Annals of Coloproctology
    Hwa Jung Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(6): 398.     CrossRef
Colorecal cancer
Prognostic significance of lymph node yield on oncologic outcomes according to tumor response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer patients
Hyo Seon Ryu, In Ja Park, Bo Kyung Ahn, Min Young Park, Min Sung Kim, Young Il Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Jin Cheon Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(5):410-420.   Published online April 28, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00143.0020
  • 5,229 View
  • 130 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of lymph node yield (LNY) for survival outcomes according to tumor response after preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) in patients with rectal cancer.
Methods
This study was a retrospective study conducted in a tertiary center. A total of 1,240 patients with clinical stage II or III rectal cancer who underwent curative resection after PCRT between 2007 and 2016 were included. Patients were categorized into the good response group (tumor regression grade [TRG], 0–1) or poor response group (TRG, 2–3). Propensity score matching was performed for age, sex, and pathologic stage between LNY of ≥12 and LNY of <12 within tumor response group. The primary outcome was 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS).
Results
LNY and positive lymph nodes were inversely correlated with TRG. In good responders, 5-year DFS and 5-year OS of patients with LNY of <12 were better than those with LNY of ≥12, but there was no statistical significance. In poor responders, the LNY of <12 group had worse survival outcomes than the LNY of ≥12 group, but there was also no statistical significance. LNY of ≥12 was not associated with DFS and OS in multivariate analysis.
Conclusion
LNY of <12 showed contrasting outcomes between the good and poor responders in 5-year DFS and OS. LNY of 12 may not imply adequate oncologic surgery or proper staging in rectal cancer patients treated by PCRT. Furthermore, a decrease in LNY should be comprehended differently according to tumor response.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Breaking Myths: Comparable Outcomes in Lymph Node Analysis Across Surgical Methods
    Salvatore Pezzino, Tonia Luca, Mariacarla Castorina, Giulia Fuccio Sanzà, Gaetano Magro, Stefano Puleo, Ornella Coco, Sergio Castorina
    Cancers.2025; 17(8): 1312.     CrossRef
  • A predictive nomogram for assessing the likelihood of retrieving 12 lymph nodes after rectal cancer surgery: a single-center study
    Jian Ma, Runyang Hao, Shuai Jiao, Qingmin Chen, Baohong Yang, Xu Guan, Jiale Li, Xinxuan Zhao, Yu Huo, Qingxia Xu, Haiyi Liu, Wen Su, Xishan Wang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients With Stage ⅡA Rectal Cancer Above the Peritoneal Reflection Who Did Not Undergo Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Hyo Seon Ryu, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Yong Sang Hong, Tae Won Kim, Chang Sik Yu
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2024; 23(4): 392.     CrossRef
  • Artificial Intelligence-Driven Volumetric Analysis of Muscle Mass as a Predictor of Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Patients with Rectal Cancer
    Minsung Kim, Sang Min Lee, Il Tae Son, Jaewoong Kang, Gyoung Tae Noh, Bo Young Oh
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(23): 7018.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategy for Early Colon Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 203.     CrossRef
Review
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Colorectal cancer,Prognosis,Biomarker & risk factor
Pretreatment inflammatory markers predicting treatment outcomes in colorectal cancer
Sanghyun An, Hongjin Shim, Kwangmin Kim, Bora Kim, Hui-Jae Bang, Hyejin Do, Hyang-Rae Lee, Youngwan Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(2):97-108.   Published online March 29, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.01004.0143
  • 10,667 View
  • 219 Download
  • 37 Web of Science
  • 39 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
We aimed to review whether pretreatment inflammatory markers reflect the short- and long-term outcomes of patients with colon cancer, rectal cancer, colon and rectal cancers, and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). We found that pretreatment complete blood count and blood chemistry tests reflect short-term and long-term oncological outcomes in patients with CRC. Specifically, in patients with colon cancer, hypoalbuminemia was associated with worse postoperative morbidity, mortality, and inferior survival. In patients with rectal cancer, elevated neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and thrombocytosis were associated with postoperative complications, poor overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). A high C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) was associated with poor OS and DFS. In patients with metastatic CRC, increased NLR and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were associated with poor OS, DFS, and progression-free survival (PFS). In addition, high CAR and a low albumin/globulin ratio on blood chemistry tests were associated with poor OS and PFS. Although universal cut-off values were not available, various types of pretreatment laboratory markers could be utilized as adjuncts to predict prognosis in patients with CRC.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Correlation between inflammatory markers and enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) failure in laparoscopic colectomy
    Ji Hyeong Song, Yoonsoo Shin, Kyung Ha Lee, Ji Yeon Kim, Jin Soo Kim
    Surgery Today.2025; 55(10): 1353.     CrossRef
  • Albumin-bilirubin score: a promising predictor of postoperative distant metastasis in patients with colorectal cancer
    Xiuying Shi, Shuyi Zhang, Baijun Bao, Hui Cong, Xiaomin Lu, Aijun Shi
    Biomarkers in Medicine.2025; 19(3): 73.     CrossRef
  • Whole transcriptome analysis identifies ALB-EEF1A1 fusion as a novel biomarker in metastatic colorectal cancer
    Deeksha Rikhari, Ankit Srivastava, Sandhya Rai, Mubashra, Srinivas Patnaik, Sameer Srivastava
    Cancer Pathogenesis and Therapy.2025; 3(5): 420.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Implications of the C-Reactive Protein–Albumin Ratio as a Prognostic Marker in Terminally Ill Patients with Cancer
    Koji Amano, Satomi Okamura, Tomofumi Miura, Vickie E. Baracos, Naoharu Mori, Tatsuma Sakaguchi, Yu Uneno, Hiroto Ishiki, Yusuke Hiratsuka, Naosuke Yokomichi, Jun Hamano, Mika Baba, Masanori Mori, Tatsuya Morita
    Journal of Palliative Medicine.2025; 28(5): 592.     CrossRef
  • Immunological changes and recovery-related factors in older patients with colon cancer: A pilot trial
    Byeo Lee Lim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Yousun Ko, Kyung Won Kim, In Ja Park
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2025; 16(3): 102200.     CrossRef
  • Advancing Colorectal Cancer Diagnostics from Barium Enema to AI-Assisted Colonoscopy
    Dumitru-Dragos Chitca, Valentin Popescu, Anca Dumitrescu, Cristian Botezatu, Bogdan Mastalier
    Diagnostics.2025; 15(8): 974.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic scoring system using inflammation- and nutrition-related biomarkers to predict prognosis in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients
    Ke-Jin Li, Zi-Yi Zhang, Kuan Wang, Subinur Sulayman, Xiang-Yue Zeng, Juan Liu, Yi Chen, Ze-Liang Zhao
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Role of Pre-Treatment Inflammatory Biomarkers in Predicting Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer
    Yunus Emre Altıntaş, Ahmet Bilici, Özcan Yıldız, Oğuzcan Kınıkoğlu, Ömer Fatih Ölmez
    Medicina.2025; 61(5): 865.     CrossRef
  • Combining Preoperative and Postoperative Prognostic Nutritional Index as an Improved Prognostic Factor for Overall Survival in Patients with Colorectal Cancer
    Jong Min Lee, Jeonghyun Kang
    Journal of Inflammation Research.2025; Volume 18: 8935.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic role of preoperative inflammatory markers in postoperative lung metastasis of colorectal cancer: a retrospective study
    Jiukang Sun, Weili Xiong, Zhang Fang, Chuanjun Song
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development and validation of predictive models for disease-free survival and overall survival in non-metastatic right-sided colon adenocarcinoma patients based on inflammatory and nutritional indices
    Yifan Zhang, Yun Zhou, Chengjun Wu, Cheng Ma
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Immunomarkers could predict overall survival and disease-free survival after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery due to locally advanced rectal cancer
    Miguel A. Bonilla-Cozar, Anabel Garcia-Leon, Carlos J. Garcia-Sanchez, M. Luisa Reyes-Diaz, Irene Ramallo-Solis, Fernando De la Portilla, Javier Padillo, Rosa M. Jimenez-Rodriguez
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2025; 103(10): 800199.     CrossRef
  • Inflammatory markers associated with radiation induced lung injury, metastasis and mortality after breast cancer treatment
    Jarle Karlsen, Guro Giskeødegård, Torgrim Tandstad, Øyvind Salvesen, Torgeir Wethal, Randi Johansen Reidunsdatter
    Advances in Radiation Oncology.2025; : 101894.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal Cancer—One Disease, Two Fires: Distinct Inflammatory Landscapes in Colon and Rectal Cancer
    Catalin Vladut Ionut Feier, Florin Grama, Georgiana Viorica Moise, Razvan Constantin Vonica, Vasile Gaborean, Alaviana Monique Faur, Vladut Iosif Rus, Calin Muntean
    Diagnostics.2025; 15(18): 2387.     CrossRef
  • Development and external validation of a multivariate model for predicting pneumonia in patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis: a retrospective study
    Xiao Hua Yang, Ju Zhang, Xi Sheng Xie, Wen Wu Tang
    PeerJ.2025; 13: e20070.     CrossRef
  • Immunomarkers could predict overall survival and disease-free survival after neoadjuvant therapy and surgery due to locally advanced rectal cancer
    Miguel A. Bonilla-Cozar, Anabel Garcia-Leon, Carlos J. Garcia-Sanchez, M. Luisa Reyes-Diaz, Irene Ramallo-Solis, Fernando De la Portilla, Javier Padillo, Rosa M. Jimenez-Rodriguez
    Cirugía Española.2025; 103(10): 800199.     CrossRef
  • Web-based explainable machine-learning tool for predicting five-year recurrence of colorectal cancer after curative resection: multicentre retrospective cohort study
    Chi-Sheng Chen, Tai-Han Lin, Hsing-Yi Chung, Ming-Jr Jian, Chih-Kai Chang, Cherng-Lih Perng, Ping-Ying Chang, Wen-Yen Huang, Chao-Yang Chen, Yu-Chun Lin, Hung-Sheng Shang
    Discover Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • THE ROLE OF SERUM MIDKINE IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND PROGNOSIS OF THE COLORECTAL CARCINOMA
    Ali H. Abd-Allah, Haider A. Jabbar, Mazen J. Ibrahim
    Military Medical Science Letters.2024; 93(3): 274.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the efficacy and safety of single-port versus multi-port robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: A propensity score-matched analysis
    Hye Jin Kim, Gyu-Seog Choi, Jun Seok Park, Soo Yeun Park, Seung Ho Song, Sung Min Lee, Min Hye Jeong
    Surgery.2024; 175(2): 297.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of Timely Initiation and Completion of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II/III Colorectal Adenocarcinoma
    Said Alnajjar, Sami Shoucair, Anyelin Almanzar, Kan Zheng, David Lisle, Vinay Gupta
    The American Surgeon™.2024; 90(11): 2724.     CrossRef
  • Associations of lifestyle characteristics with circulating immune markers in the general population based on NHANES 1999 to 2014
    Linfen Guo, Yating Huang, Jing He, Deng Li, Wei Li, Haitao Xiao, Xuewen Xu, Yange Zhang, Ru Wang
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer with intraoperative use of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging
    Tatsunosuke Harada, Masakatsu Numata, Shota Izukawa, Yosuke Atsumi, Keisuke Kazama, Sho Sawazaki, Teni Godai, Hiroyuki Mushiake, Nobuhiro Sugano, Mamoru Uchiyama, Akio Higuchi, Hiroshi Tamagawa, Yusuke Suwa, Jun Watanabe, Tsutomu Sato, Chikara Kunisaki, A
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(8): 4236.     CrossRef
  • The conditional recurrence-free survival after R0 hepatectomy for locally advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: A competing risk analysis based on inflammation-nutritional status
    Guizhong Huang, Pu Xi, Zehui Yao, Chongyu Zhao, Xiaohui Li, Xiaojun Lin
    Heliyon.2024; 10(13): e33931.     CrossRef
  • Predictive value of flexible proctosigmoidoscopy and laboratory findings for complete clinical responses after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced primary rectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study
    Alireza Hadizadeh, Hamed Kazemi-Khaledi, Mohammad-Sadegh Fazeli, Seyed-Mohsen Ahmadi-Tafti, Amir Keshvari, Reza Akbari-Asbagh, Mohammad-Reza Keramati, Alireza Kazemeini, Amir-Reza Fazeli, Behnam Behboudi, Mohammadamin Parsaei
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical significance of positive resection margin for patients with rectal neuroendocrine tumors within 20 mm following initial endoscopic resection: A multi-center study
    Mengping Duan, Zhanzhen Liu, Yan Qiao, Pinzhu Huang, Hao Xie, Wei Xiao, Shuangling Luo, Zhuochao Xie, Qiufeng Sun, Liwei Wang, Taixuan Wan, Zhihong Zhang, Huashan Liu, Haoqi Zheng, Yebohao Zhou, Dongxu Lei, Yunxing Shi, Sichong Lai, Ziwei Zhou, Fujin Ye,
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024; 50(11): 108651.     CrossRef
  • Elevated fibrinogen-albumin ratio is an adverse prognostic factor for patients with primarily resected gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma
    Gerd Jomrich, Winny Yan, Dagmar Kollmann, Ivan Kristo, Daniel Winkler, Hannah Puhr, Aysegül lhan-Mutlu, Marlene Hollenstein, Reza Asari, Sebastian F. Schoppmann
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Significance of the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-monocyte ratio, and platelet-lymphocyte ratio in peripheral blood for endometrial cancer
    Di Huo
    American Journal of Translational Research.2024; 16(11): 6689.     CrossRef
  • Machine-Learning Algorithms Using Systemic Inflammatory Markers to Predict the Oncologic Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer After Surgery
    Songsoo Yang, Hyosoon Jang, In Kyu Park, Hye Sun Lee, Kang Young Lee, Ga Eul Oh, Chihyun Park, Jeonghyun Kang
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2023; 30(13): 8717.     CrossRef
  • Predictive and prognostic value of inflammatory markers in locally advanced rectal cancer (PILLAR) – A multicentric analysis by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) Gastrointestinal Study Group
    Giuditta Chiloiro, Angela Romano, Silvia Mariani, Gabriella Macchia, Diana Giannarelli, Luciana Caravatta, Pierfrancesco Franco, Luca Boldrini, Alessandra Arcelli, Almalina Bacigalupo, Liliana Belgioia, Antonella Fontana, Elisa Meldolesi, Giampaolo Montes
    Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology.2023; 39: 100579.     CrossRef
  • A Novel Prognostic Index for Metastatic Colon Cancer: The Prognostic Immune Nutritional Index
    Erkan Kayikcioglu, Gokce Iscan
    Cureus.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Combining prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a valuable prognostic factor for overall survival in patients with stage I–III colorectal cancer
    Harin Kim, Dong-Min Shin, Jae-Hoon Lee, Eun-Suk Cho, Hye Sun Lee, Su-Jin Shin, Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Jeonghyun Kang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development of preoperative and postoperative machine learning models to predict the recurrence of huge hepatocellular carcinoma following surgical resection
    Qinghua Zhang, Guoxu Fang, Tiancong Huang, Guangya Wei, Haitao Li, Jingfeng Liu
    Oncology Letters.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cancer and Diabetes: Predictive Factors in Patients with Metabolic Syndrome
    Mihai Cosmin Stan, Daniel Georgescu, Ciprian Camil Mireștean, Florinel Bădulescu
    Diagnostics.2023; 13(16): 2647.     CrossRef
  • ASO Author Reflections: Could the Application of Machine Learning Enhance the Accuracy of Prognosis Estimation Using Serum Inflammatory Markers in Colorectal Cancer Patients?
    Jeonghyun Kang
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2023; 30(13): 8522.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic prediction of colorectal cancer using the C-reactive protein to albumin ratio: the importance of inflammatory biomarkers and their association with long-term outcomes
    Chul Seung Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(4): 287.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Significance of Combining Preoperative and Postoperative Albumin-Bilirubin Score in Colorectal Cancer
    Doyoun Kim, Jae-Hoon Lee, Eun-Suk Cho, Su-Jin Shin, Hye Sun Lee, Hwa-Hee Koh, Kang Young Lee, Jeonghyun Kang
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2023; 55(4): 1261.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
  • Inflammatory Response Markers as Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Prognosis
    Minsung Kim, Il Tae Son, Bo Young Oh
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Preoperative albumin–bilirubin score as a prognostic indicator in patients with stage III colon cancer
    Hyun Gu Lee, Seok-Byung Lim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Jin Cheon Kim
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
Original Articles
Malignant disease,Colorectal cancer,Epidemiology & etiology
Clinicopathologic characteristics of early-onset colorectal cancer
Kui Seon Park, Young Ki Hong, Yoon Jung Choi, Jung Gu Kang
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(5):362-369.   Published online March 11, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00976.0139
  • 8,749 View
  • 219 Download
  • 21 Web of Science
  • 23 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The aim of this study was to analysis of the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) under the age of 50 years.
Methods
Between January 2009 and December 2018, 1,126 primary CRC patients were included from National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital. The patients were divided into group 1 (n=111, ≤50 years) and group 2 (n=1,015, >50 years). The clinicopathologic features and prognostic outcomes were compared. In addition, to analyze whether there were any differences of those characteristics in 3 groups, patients aged under 50 years were divided into their 20s, 30s, and 40s.
Results
Group 1 had a slightly higher distribution in the left colon and rectum, lower T stage I and higher T stage IV rate, and a significantly higher distribution in stage N2 than group 2 (30.6%:16.3%, P<0.001). Poor histological differentiation of tumors was significantly high in group 1 (P=0.003). The 5-year survival rate for those in their 30s (69.2%) and 40s (91.6%) was higher than those in their 20s who died immediately after surgery (P<0.001). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was also confirmed to be meaningful for each age group, with 0% in their 20s, 53.8% in their 30s, 79.2% in their 40s (P<0.001).
Conclusion
Although the age was not an independent prognostic factor for overall survival in this study, the early onset group of CRCs is more advanced at the time of diagnosis and has a more aggressive histologic type.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic Differences Between Early-Onset and Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer
    Vlad Alexandru Ionescu, Gina Gheorghe, Ioana-Alexandra Baban, Alexandru Barbu, Teodor Florin Georgescu, Loredana-Crista Tiuca, Ninel Antonie Iacobus, Camelia Cristina Diaconu
    Medicina.2025; 61(3): 390.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Analysis of Tumor Characteristics, Treatment Response, and Oncological Outcomes in Early-Onset Versus Late-Onset Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Muhammad S Khan, Azwa Ali, Murk Niaz, Raheena Hassan, Bushra Shirazi, Raja Taha Yaseen Khan
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Colorectal Neoplasia in Vietnamese Patients Under 50 Years of Age: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Nhan Quang Le, Luan Minh Dang, Tien Manh Huynh, Chuong Dinh Nguyen, Diem Thi Ngoc Vo, Truc Le Thanh Tran, Vy Ly Thao Tran, An Duc Le, Tai Duy Nguyen, Hen Van Dao, Trung Duc Nguyen, Duc Trong Quach
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2025; 85(2): 185.     CrossRef
  • Comparative analysis of sporadic, IBD-associated, early-onset and late-onset colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Giacomo Fuschillo, Olga Maria Nardone, Giulio Calabrese, Marc Martí-Gallostra, Francesco Selvaggi, Eloy Espín-Basany, Gianluca Pellino, Jose Perea
    Therapeutic Advances in Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Elastic Tissue Staining Significantly Enhances Detection of Venous Invasion Compared to Conventional H and E Staining in Colorectal, Breast and Thyroid Carcinomas
    Afraa Asif, Yusra Khan, Manahel Khuram, Mohammed Khalil, Sunil Bylappa, Abid Shaheer
    Biomedical and Pharmacology Journal.2025; 18(3): 2434.     CrossRef
  • Short-term surgical outcomes for colon adenocarcinoma: Racial-Ethnic comparisons in a universal access health system
    Yvonne L. Eaglehouse, Sarah Darmon, Michele M. Gage, Craig D. Shriver, Kangmin Zhu
    Surgical Oncology.2025; 63: 102295.     CrossRef
  • Young-onset versus late-onset colorectal cancer: clinicopathological features and survival outcome: a decade-long analysis from a middle Eastern tertiary center
    Ammar Aleter, Ali Toffaha, Ejaz Ahmed Latif, Mahwish Khawar, Ibrahim Amer, Samer A. Hasan, Mahmood AL-Dhaheri, Ayman Ahmed, Ayman El-Menyar, Mohamed Abu Nada, Amjad Parvaiz
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Short-term surgical outcomes in patients with early- versus average-onset colon adenocarcinoma in the Military Health System
    Yvonne L Eaglehouse, Sarah Darmon, Robert W Krell, Michele M Gage, Craig D Shriver, Kangmin Zhu
    JNCI Cancer Spectrum.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multiethnic Trends in Early Onset Colorectal Cancer
    Michelle Nagata, Kohei Miyagi, Brenda Y. Hernandez, Scott K. Kuwada
    Cancers.2024; 16(2): 398.     CrossRef
  • Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus R0 resection for resectable colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases and low peritoneal cancer index scores: a collaborative observational study from Korea and Japan
    Daichi Kitaguchi, Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik, Shoma Sasaki, Yuichiro Tsukada, Masaaki Ito
    International Journal of Surgery.2024; 110(1): 45.     CrossRef
  • Surgical and survival outcomes of early‐onset colorectal cancer patients: a single‐centre descriptive Australian study
    Celine Garrett, Daniel Steffens, Michael Solomon, Cherry Koh
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2024; 94(9): 1584.     CrossRef
  • Global epidemiology of early‐onset upper gastrointestinal cancer: trend from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019
    Pojsakorn Danpanichkul, Thanida Auttapracha, Siwanart Kongarin, Ben Ponvilawan, Daniel M. Simadibrata, Kwanjit Duangsonk, Supitchaya Jaruvattanadilok, Sakditad Saowapa, Kanokphong Suparan, Rashid N. Lui, Suthat Liangpunsakul, Michael B. Wallace, Karn Wija
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2024; 39(9): 1856.     CrossRef
  • Early onset metastatic colorectal cancer in Australia
    A. Jalali, S. Smith, G. Kim, H. Wong, M. Lee, J. Yeung, M. Loft, R. Wong, J.D. Shapiro, S. Kosmider, J. Tie, S. Ananda, B. Ma, M. Burge, R. Jennens, B. Lee, J. Johns, L. Lim, A. Dean, L. Nott, P. Gibbs
    Cancer Treatment and Research Communications.2024; 40: 100827.     CrossRef
  • Five-year overall survival of early- and late-onset colorectal cancer in Medellín, Colombia: a comparative study
    Álvaro Esteban Ruiz-Grajales, Juan Camilo Correa-Cote, Miguel Ángel Sánchez-Zapata, Manuela María Orozco-Puerta, Juan Felipe Baena-García, Esteban Castrillón-Martínez
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The prognostic significance of clinicopathological characteristics in early-onset versus late-onset colorectal cancer liver metastases
    Yi-Tong Li, Xiang-Yu Wang, Bo Zhang, Bao-Rui Tao, Zhen-Mei Chen, Xiao-Chen Ma, Jia-Hao Han, Chong Zhang, Rui Zhang, Jin-Hong Chen
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical implication of tissue carcinoembryonic antigen expression in association with serum carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer
    Abdulmohsin Fawzi Aldilaijan, Young Il Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Jihun Kim, Jun-Soo Ro, Jin Cheon Kim
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Patients younger than 40 years with colorectal cancer have a similar prognosis to older patients
    Tomoki Abe, Takeru Matsuda, Ryuichiro Sawada, Hiroshi Hasegawa, Kimihiro Yamashita, Takashi Kato, Hitoshi Harada, Naoki Urakawa, Hironobu Goto, Shingo Kanaji, Taro Oshikiri, Yoshihiro Kakeji
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical and pathological characteristics of early-onset colorectal cancer in South Korea
    Su Bee Park, Jin Young Yoon, Min Seob Kwak, Jae Myung Cha
    Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 29(6): 358.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
  • Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
    Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Techniques for Transanal Local Excision for Early Rectal Cancer
    Gyoung Tae Noh
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Is the oncological impact of vascular invasion more important in right colon cancer?
    Gyung Mo Son
    Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2022; 25(2): 49.     CrossRef
  • Different Oncologic Outcomes in Early-Onset and Late-Onset Sporadic Colorectal Cancer: A Regression Analysis on 2073 Patients
    Caterina Foppa, Annalisa Maroli, Sara Lauricella, Antonio Luberto, Carlotta La Raja, Francesca Bunino, Michele Carvello, Matteo Sacchi, Francesca De Lucia, Giuseppe Clerico, Marco Montorsi, Antonino Spinelli
    Cancers.2022; 14(24): 6239.     CrossRef
Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer
Prognostic Factors Affecting Disease-Free Survival and Overall Survival in T4 Colon Cancer
Taeyeong Eom, Yujin Lee, Jungbin Kim, Inseok Park, Geumhee Gwak, Hyunjin Cho, Keunho Yang, Kiwhan Kim, Byung-Noe Bae
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(4):259-265.   Published online June 24, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.00759.0108
Correction in: Ann Coloproctol 2023;39(5):444
  • 7,583 View
  • 109 Download
  • 19 Web of Science
  • 19 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
It is known that as the T stage of a carcinoma progresses, the prognosis becomes poorer. However, there are few studies about factors that affect the prognosis of T4 advanced colon cancer. This study aimed to identify the prognostic factors associated with disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in T4 colon cancer.
Methods
Patients diagnosed with stage T4 on histopathology after undergoing curative surgery for colon cancer between March 2009 and March 2018 were retrospectively analyzed for factors related to postoperative survival. Primary outcomes were DFS and OS.
Results
Eighty-two patients were included in the study. DFS and OS of the pathologic (p) T4b group were not inferior to that of the pT4a group. Multivariate analysis showed that differentiation (hazard ratio [HR], 4.994; P = 0.005), and laparoscopic surgery (HR, 0.323; P = 0.008) were significant prognostic factors for DFS, while differentiation (HR, 7.904; P ≤ 0.001) and chemotherapy (HR, 0.344; P = 0.038) were significant prognostic factors for OS.
Conclusion
Tumor differentiation, laparoscopic surgery, and adjuvant chemotherapy were found to be significant prognostic factors in patients with T4 colon cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy and curative resections by laparoscopy might improve the prognosis in these patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Tailored-surgery for locally advanced colon cancer based on 3D mathematical reconstruction surgical planner: Observational comparative non-randomized study
    Sebastián Jerí-McFarlane, Álvaro García-Granero, Marco Antonio Martínez-Ortega, Isabel Amengual-Antich, Ángela Rodríguez Robayo, Margarita Gamundí-Cuesta, Francisco Xavier González-Argenté
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2025; 51(2): 109584.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factors of Postoperative Mortality in Patients with Complicated Right Colon Cancer
    Raul Mihailov, Corina Dima, Bianca Georgiana Constantin, Florentin Dimofte, Mihaela Craescu, Lavinia Moroianu, Laura Iuliana Candussi, Virginia Lutenco, Oana Mariana Mihailov, Valerii Lutenco
    Life.2025; 15(3): 350.     CrossRef
  • The impact of sarcopenic obesity on the prevalence and prognosis of non-metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wanping Wang, Fang Fang, Tianxiu Wang, Xinyi Chen, Lu Zhao, Chunmei Wang, Yujia Tang, Qin Li, Dong Tang, Jingqiu Zhang
    Clinical Nutrition ESPEN.2025; 69: 492.     CrossRef
  • Cytoreductive surgery plus hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy versus R0 resection for resectable colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases and low peritoneal cancer index scores: a collaborative observational study from Korea and Japan
    Daichi Kitaguchi, Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik, Shoma Sasaki, Yuichiro Tsukada, Masaaki Ito
    International Journal of Surgery.2024; 110(1): 45.     CrossRef
  • Cytotoxicity of Salvigenin from Asterohyptis stellulata in Combination with Clinical Drugs Against Colorectal Cancer
    Briand André Rojas-Castaño, Adriana C. Hernández-Rojas, Rogelio Pereda-Miranda, Mabel Fragoso-Serrano
    Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia.2024; 34(5): 1172.     CrossRef
  • Sorbate metal complexes as newer antibacterial, antibiofilm, and anticancer compounds
    Amira I. Abousaty, Fifi M. Reda, Wessam A. Hassanin, Walaa M. Felifel, Walaa H. El-Shwiniy, Heba M. R. M. Selim, Mahmoud M. Bendary
    BMC Microbiology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Association Between Surgical Site Infection and Prognosis of T4 Colorectal Cancer
    Takuya Koike, Masaya Mukai, Kyoko Kishima, Daiki Yokoyama, Sayuri Hasegawa, Lin Fung Chan, Hideki Izumi, Kazutake Okada, Tomoko Sugiyama, Takuma Tajiri
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Utilizing stimuli-responsive nanoparticles to deliver and enhance the anti-tumor effects of bilirubin
    Elaheh Mirhadi, Alexandra E. Butler, Prashant Kesharwani, Amirhossein Sahebkar
    Biotechnology Advances.2024; 77: 108469.     CrossRef
  • Can clinicopathologic high-risk features in T3N0 colon cancer be reliable prognostic factors?
    Hyun Gu Lee, Young IL Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 104(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • Clinical implication of tissue carcinoembryonic antigen expression in association with serum carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer
    Abdulmohsin Fawzi Aldilaijan, Young Il Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Jihun Kim, Jun-Soo Ro, Jin Cheon Kim
    Scientific Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Do Laparoscopic Approaches Ensure Oncological Safety and Prognosis for Serosa-Exposed Colon Cancer? A Comparative Study against the Open Approach
    Ji-Hyun Seo, In-Ja Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(21): 5211.     CrossRef
  • Erratum to “Prognostic factors affecting disease-free survival and overall survival in T4 colon cancer”

    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(5): 444.     CrossRef
  • Inflammatory Response Markers as Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Prognosis
    Minsung Kim, Il Tae Son, Bo Young Oh
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Prognostic Reliability of Lymphovascular Invasion for Patients with T3N0 Colorectal Cancer in Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decision Making
    Hayoung Lee, Seung-Yeon Yoo, In Ja Park, Seung-Mo Hong, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Cancers.2022; 14(12): 2833.     CrossRef
  • Molecular analyses of peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 586.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Analyses in Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 197.     CrossRef
  • Impact on inadequate lymph node harvest on survival in T4N0 colorectal cancer: A would-be medical center experience in Taiwan
    Yi-Kai Kao, Hsin-Pao Chen, Kuang-Wen Liu, Ling-Chiao Song, Yi-Chieh Chen, Yu-Chun Lin, Chih-I Chen
    Medicine.2022; 101(52): e32497.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic risk factors for pT4 colon cancer: A retrospective cohort study
    Tsutomu Kumamoto, Shigeki Yamaguchi, Ryosuke Nakagawa, Yoji Nagashima, Fumi Maeda, Kimitaka Tani, Hiroka Kondo, Kurodo Koshino, Yuka Kaneko, Yoshiko Bamba, Shimpei Ogawa, Yuji Inoue, Michio Itabashi
    Oncology Letters.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Antiproliferative and palliative activity of flavonoids in colorectal cancer
    Javier Fernández, Blanca Silván, Rodrigo Entrialgo-Cadierno, Claudio J. Villar, Raffaele Capasso, José Antonio Uranga, Felipe Lombó, Raquel Abalo
    Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2021; 143: 112241.     CrossRef
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer
The Impact of Primary Tumor Resection on Survival in Asymptomatic Colorectal Cancer Patients With Unresectable Metastases
Ki Yoon Doah, Ui Sup Shin, Byong Ho Jeon, Sang Sik Cho, Sun Mi Moon
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(2):94-100.   Published online April 30, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.09.15.1
  • 6,453 View
  • 93 Download
  • 17 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of primary tumor resection (PTR) in asymptomatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with unresectable metastases using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method to minimize selection bias.
Methods
We selected 146 patients diagnosed with stage IV CRC with unresectable metastasis between 2001 and 2018 from our institutional database. In a multivariate logistic regression model using the patients’ baseline covariates associated with PTR, we applied the IPTW method based on a propensity score and performed a weighted Cox proportional regression analysis to estimate survival according to PTR.
Results
Upfront PTR was performed in 98 patients, and no significant differences in baseline factors were detected. The upweighted median survival of the PTR group was 18 months and that of the non-PTR group was 15 months (P = 0.15). After applying the IPTW, the PTR was still insignificant in the univariate Cox regression (hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.5–1.21). However, in the multivariate weighted Cox regression with adjustment for other covariates, the PTR showed a significantly decreased risk of cancer-related death (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40–0.94).
Conclusion
In this study, we showed that asymptomatic CRC patients with unresectable metastases could gain a survival benefit from upfront PTR by analysis with the IPTW method. However, randomized controlled trials are mandatory.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A predictive model to identify optimal candidates for surgery among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer
    Xiqiang Zhang, Zhaoyi Jing, Longchao Wu, Ze Tao, Dandan Lu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Recurrence Rates and Postoperative Complications Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A 5-Year Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Peshawar
    Tilal Ahmed Raza, Hussain Jan Abbasi, Farrukh Ozair, Hajra Imtiaz
    Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences.2025; : 120.     CrossRef
  • Primary tumor resection for asymptomatic colorectal cancer patients with synchronous unresectable metastases: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and case-matched studies
    Jun Huang, Jiahao Zhou, Ping Zhang, Qingbin Wu, Ziqiang Wang
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of primary tumor resection on survival in patients with asymptomatic unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chengren Zhang, Cong Cao, Lili Liu, Yaochun Lv, Jingjing Li, Jiyong Lu, Shuai Wang, Binbin Du, Xiongfei Yang
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2023; 23(1): 107.     CrossRef
  • The role of upfront primary tumor resection in asymptomatic patients with unresectable stage IV colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zongyu Liang, Zhiyuan Liu, Chengzhi Huang, Xin Chen, Zhaojun Zhang, Meijuan Xiang, Weixian Hu, Junjiang Wang, Xingyu Feng, Xueqing Yao
    Frontiers in Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Primary tumor resection in colorectal cancer patients with unresectable distant metastases: a minireview
    Junge Bai, Ming Yang, Zheng Liu, Sergey Efetov, Cuneyt Kayaalp, Audrius Dulskas, Darcy Shaw, Xishan Wang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Palliative primary tumor resection in minimally symptomatic (asymptomatic) patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous unresectable metastases versus chemotherapy alone: a metaanalysis
    Iu. V. Alimova, Yu. A. Shelygin, E. G. Rybakov, M. V. Alekseev
    Koloproktologia.2023; 22(2): 126.     CrossRef
  • The impact of primary tumor resection for asymptomatic colorectal cancer patients with unresectable metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Shuyuan Li, Liqiang Ji, Jie Huang, Ye Wang, Peng Liu, Wei Zhang, Zheng Lou
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The impact of palliative primary tumor resection on overall survival in minimally symptomatic (asymptomatic) colorectal cancer and synchronous unresectable metastases vs chemotherapy only: a comparative study of outcomes
    Iu. V. Alimova, S. I. Achkasov, Yu. A. Shelygin, M. V. Alekseev, V. N. Kashnikov, M. Yu. Fedyanin, M. A. Danilov, E. G. Rybakov
    Koloproktologia.2023; 22(4): 10.     CrossRef
  • Recurrence Patterns and Risk Factors after Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: Insights for Postoperative Surveillance Strategies
    Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim, Ye Ryung Park, Eun Hae Cho, Jeong Min Choo, Ji-Seon Kim, Se-Jin Baek, Jung-Myun Kwak
    Cancers.2023; 15(24): 5791.     CrossRef
  • Palliative primary tumor resection in minimally symptomatic patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous unresectable metastases: when is it necessary? (systematic review)
    Iu. V. Alimova, Yu. A. Shelygin, E. G. Rybakov
    Koloproktologia.2022; 21(3): 99.     CrossRef
  • Surgical treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 568.     CrossRef
  • Recent Advance in the Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 213.     CrossRef
  • Molecular analyses of peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 586.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Analyses in Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 197.     CrossRef
  • Primary Tumor Resection in Asymptomatic Colorectal Cancer Patients With Unresectable Metastases: Can It Improve Survival?
    Myong Hoon Ihn
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(2): 71.     CrossRef
  • Treatment for Peritoneal Metastasis of Patients With Colorectal Cancer
    Young Jin Kim, Chang Hyun Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 425.     CrossRef
Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer,Biomarker & risk factor
Prognostic Factor and Survival Benefit of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage IIA Colon Cancer
Mok-Won Lee, Jin-Su Kim, Ji-Yeon Kim, Kyung-ha Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(1):35-43.   Published online September 18, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.09.03
  • 5,735 View
  • 136 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 8 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
There is no clear evidence of the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in stage IIA colon cancer. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic factors and survival benefit of AC in this disease.
Methods
A retrospective data collection for patients who underwent radical surgery for colon cancer between January 2008 and December 2015 was undertaken. The cohort was divided into the no-AC and AC groups.
Results
We included 227 patients with stage IIA colon cancer in our study cohort, including 67 and 160 patients in the no-AC and AC groups, respectively. The number of retrieved lymph nodes and the presence of tumor complications as obstruction or perforation were independent risk factors for survival. In the no-AC group, there was a significant difference in survival according to the number of retrieved lymph nodes. In the AC group, there were significant differences in survival according to sidedness and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). There was no significant difference in survival between the no-AC and the AC groups.
Conclusion
The number of retrieved lymph nodes and the presence of tumor complications were prognostic factors for stage IIA colon cancer but lymphovascular and perineural invasion were not. Sidedness and preoperative CEA could be used as factors to predict the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy. Currently, it is believed that there is no benefit of AC for stage IIA colon cancer. Further studies are needed to determine the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IIA colon cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Can clinicopathologic high-risk features in T3N0 colon cancer be reliable prognostic factors?
    Hyun Gu Lee, Young IL Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 104(2): 109.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Effectiveness of Fluorescence Lymph Node Mapping Using ICG for Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy: A Prospective Case–Control Study
    Gyung Mo Son, Mi Sook Yun, In Young Lee, Sun Bin Im, Kyung Hee Kim, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Dong-Hoon Shin, Armaan M. Nazir, Gi Won Ha
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 4927.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
  • The Prognostic Reliability of Lymphovascular Invasion for Patients with T3N0 Colorectal Cancer in Adjuvant Chemotherapy Decision Making
    Hayoung Lee, Seung-Yeon Yoo, In Ja Park, Seung-Mo Hong, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Cancers.2022; 14(12): 2833.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Analyses in Peritoneal Metastasis from Colorectal Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 197.     CrossRef
  • Adjuvant chemotherapy benefits on patients with elevated carcinoembryonic antigen in stage IIA colon cancer: a SEER-based analysis
    Huabin Zhou, Songsheng Wang, Zhai Cai, Enming Qiu, Qianyun Chen, Xi Rao, Shuai Han, Zhou Li
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(12): 2481.     CrossRef
  • Molecular analyses of peritoneal metastasis from colorectal cancer
    Chang Hyun Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 586.     CrossRef
  • Direction of diagnosis and treatment improvement in colorectal cancer
    In Ja Park
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 540.     CrossRef
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer
Clinicopathologic Analysis of Lateral Margin Measured by Whole-Mount Section in T3 Rectal Cancer
Soomin Nam, Youngki Hong, Yoon Jung Choi, Jung Gu Kang
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(3):172-177.   Published online January 31, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.01.19.1
  • 4,427 View
  • 103 Download
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Total mesorectal excision is a standard technique for rectal cancer. The whole-mount section can encompass the entire specimen, so it is a more appropriate for measuring circumferential margin than conventional section. We analyzed the clinical characteristics and prognosis based on lateral margins measured by whole-mount sections. Materials and Methods: Medical records of patients who were operated on for T3 rectal cancer from 2005 to 2015 were reviewed retrospectively. A total of 154 patients were included. The slides of the whole-mount sections were re-reviewed by a single pathologist.
Results
We divided the groups according to the length of the lateral margin (LM: 1mm, 1.5mm and 2mm). There was significantly frequent lymphovascular invasion and N state was higher when LM was short in all groups. There were more micrometastasis in group LM

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk factors of positive resection margin differ in pancreaticoduodenectomy and distal pancreatosplenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing upfront surgery
    Bo Li, Shiwei Guo, Xiaoyi Yin, Chenming Ni, Suizhi Gao, Gang Li, Canrong Ni, Hui Jiang, Wan Yee Lau, Gang Jin
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2023; 46(4): 1541.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early colon cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 558.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategy for Early Colon Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 203.     CrossRef
  • Is Whole-Mount Section in Rectal Cancer Effective for Measuring Lateral Margin?
    Jun Seong Chung, Han Deok Kwak, Jae Kyun Ju
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(3): 131.     CrossRef
Case Report
Malignant disease
Nasal Cavity Metastasis From Colorectal Cancer Represents End-Stage Disease and Should Be Palliated
Stephen Hwang, Dedrick Kok Hong Chan, Fredrik Petersson, Ker-Kan Tan
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(2):119-121.   Published online November 13, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.03.04
  • 5,940 View
  • 113 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Nasal metastases from colorectal cancer is rare. The presentation of nasal metastases is often very similar to primary nasal sinus adenocarcinoma. A high index of suspicion is required, especially in patients who have had a previous history of colorectal carcinoma. Histology is ultimately required for diagnosis. We describe 2 cases of nasal metastases from colorectal carcinoma, and discuss the presentation, diagnosis and management of the case. Such metastatic disease ultimately represents end-stage malignancy, and patients should be palliated.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Metastatic sinonasal malignancies of colorectal origin: Case report and comprehensive review of the literature
    Andrew J. Rothka, David Goldrich, Jessyka G. Lighthall
    Clinical Case Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Surgical treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 568.     CrossRef
  • Recent Advance in the Surgical Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 213.     CrossRef
  • A Very Rare Case of Metastases to the Nasal Cavity from Primary Rectal Adenocarcinoma
    Nishant Lohia, Harish Sadashiva, Sankalp Singh, Samir Agarwal, Vikas Gupta, Manoj Prashar, Gaurav Trivedi
    Clinical Cancer Investigation Journal.2022; 11(4): 1.     CrossRef
  • Major driver mutations are shared between sinonasal intestinal-type adenocarcinoma and the morphologically identical colorectal adenocarcinoma
    Sannia Sjöstedt, Ane Yde Schmidt, Filipe Garrett Vieira, Gro Linno Willemoe, Tina Klitmøller Agander, Caroline Olsen, Finn Cilius Nielsen, Christian von Buchwald
    Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.2021; 147(4): 1019.     CrossRef
  • Rare case of metastatic adenocarcinoma to the maxillary sinus
    Apurwa Prasad, Taha Alrifai, Sumathi Vijaya Rangan, Jessica Garcia
    BMJ Case Reports.2021; 14(9): e244485.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio: A Predictive Marker for Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Rectal Cancer Who Underwent Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation Followed by Surgery
Byong Ho Jeon, Ui Sup Shin, Sun Mi Moon, Jung Il Choi, Mi-Sook Kim, Kie Hwan Kim, Se-Jin Sung
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(2):100-106.   Published online April 30, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.10.01
  • 6,425 View
  • 133 Download
  • 19 Web of Science
  • 20 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
In this study, we investigated the role of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a predictor of tumor response and as a prognostic factor in patients with rectal cancer who had undergone curative surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (nCRT).
Methods
Between January 2009 and July 2016, we collected 140 consecutive patients who had undergone curative intent surgery after nCRT due to rectal adenocarcinoma. We obtained the pre- and post-nCRT NLR by dividing the neutrophil count by the lymphocyte count. The cutoff value was obtained using receiver operating characteristic analysis for tumor response and using maximally selected rank analysis for recurrence-free survival (RFS). The relationship among NLR, tumor response, and RFS was assessed by adjusting the possible clinico-pathological confounding factors.
Results
The possibility of pathologic complete response (pCR) was significantly decreased in high pre- (>2.77) and postnCRT NLR (>3.23) in univariate regression analysis. In multivariate analysis, high post-nCRT NLR was an independent negative predictive factor for pCR (adjusted odds ratio, 0.365; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.145–0.918). The 5-year RFS of all patients was 74.6% during the median 37 months of follow-up. Patients with higher pre- (>2.66) and post-nCRT NLR (>5.21) showed lower 5-year RFS rates (53.1 vs. 83.3%, P = 0.006) (69.2 vs. 75.7%, P = 0.054). In multivariate Cox analysis, high pre-nCRT NLR was an independent poor prognostic factor for RFS (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.300; 95% CI, 1.061–4.985).
Conclusion
Elevated NLR was a negative predictive marker for pCR and was independently associated with decreased RFS. For confirmation, a large-scale study with appropriate controls is needed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Recurrence risk following rectal cancer surgery: a survival analysis of key predictors
    Neda Gorjizadeh, Reza Hajebi, Matin Vahedi, Mahsa Mottahedi, Elham Nazar
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2025; 55(8): 880.     CrossRef
  • Circulating Markers of Systemic Inflammation, Measured After Completion of Neoadjuvant Therapy, Associated With Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Ross K. McMahon, Sean M. O’Cathail, Colin W. Steele, Harikrishnan S. Nair, Jonathan J. Platt, Donald C. McMillan, Paul G. Horgan, Campbell S. Roxburgh
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2025; 68(6): 713.     CrossRef
  • Response Prediction to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Rectal Cancer Based on Systemic Inflammatory Markers (NLR, PLR, and LMR)
    Roger Beltrati Coser, Caio Sergio R. Nahas, Alex Jones Flores Cassenote, Omar S. T. Ghani, Rafaela B. B. Pinheiro, Sergio Carlos Nahas, Carlos Frederico S. Marques
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Value of Dynamic Changes in Immune-Inflammatory and Tumor Biomarkers Following Chemoradiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
    Mahmoud Al-Masri, Yasmin Safi, Mohammad Almasri, Ramiz Kardan, Daliana Mustafa, Osama Alayyan, Bilal Kahalah, Rama AlMasri
    Cancers.2025; 17(20): 3383.     CrossRef
  • Landscape of Biomarkers and Pathologic Response in Rectal Cancer: Where We Stand?
    Abrahams Ocanto, Macarena Teja, Francesco Amorelli, Felipe Couñago, Ariel Gomez Palacios, Diego Alcaraz, Ramón Cantero
    Cancers.2024; 16(23): 4047.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic role of platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte, and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio in operated rectal cancer patients: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Giuseppe Portale, Patrizia Bartolotta, Danila Azzolina, Dario Gregori, Valentino Fiscon
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • NEUTROPHIL-LYMPHOCYTE RATIO (NLR) AND LYMPHOPENIAAS PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF OVERALL SURVIVAL IN LOCALADVANCED RECTAL CANCER
    Ocanto A, Morera R, Rodríguez I, Cantero R
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH.2023; : 11.     CrossRef
  • Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts survival of patients with rectal cancer receiving neo-adjuvant chemoradiation followed by radical resection: a meta-analysis
    Giuseppe Colloca, Antonella Venturino, Domenico Guarneri
    Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy.2023; 23(4): 421.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of concurrent radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer and synchronous metastasis receiving systemic therapy
    Tzu-Chieh Yin, Po-Jung Chen, Yung-Sung Yeh, Ching-Chun Li, Yen-Cheng Chen, Wei-Chih Su, Tsung-Kun Chang, Ching-Wen Huang, Chun-Ming Huang, Hsiang-Lin Tsai, Jaw-Yuan Wang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Crying Need for a Better Response Assessment in Rectal Cancer
    Samuel Amintas, Nicolas Giraud, Benjamin Fernandez, Charles Dupin, Quentin Denost, Aurelie Garant, Nora Frulio, Denis Smith, Anne Rullier, Eric Rullier, Te Vuong, Sandrine Dabernat, Véronique Vendrely
    Current Treatment Options in Oncology.2023; 24(11): 1507.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Role of Peripheral Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR) and Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) in Patients with Rectal Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
    Şefika Arzu Ergen, Ceren Barlas, Cumhur Yıldırım, Didem Çolpan Öksüz
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2022; 53(1): 151.     CrossRef
  • Deep regional hyperthermia combined with modern concurrent chemoradiotherapy increases T-downstaging rate in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Yuxia Wang, Siyi Lu, Yuxia Shao, Ran Peng, Xuemin Li, Junjie Wang, Hao Wang
    International Journal of Hyperthermia.2022; 39(1): 431.     CrossRef
  • High Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio, Platelet-Lymphocyte Ratio and Low Lymphocyte Levels Are Correlated With Worse Pathological Complete Response Rates
    Serdar Karakaya, İbrahim Karadağ, Mehmet Emin Yılmaz, Ömür Berna Çakmak Öksüzoğlu
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pretreatment inflammatory markers predicting treatment outcomes in colorectal cancer
    Sanghyun An, Hongjin Shim, Kwangmin Kim, Bora Kim, Hui-Jae Bang, Hyejin Do, Hyang-Rae Lee, Youngwan Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(2): 97.     CrossRef
  • Watch and wait strategies for rectal cancer: A systematic review
    In Ja Park
    Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(2): 91.     CrossRef
  • Histopathological and Haemogram Features Correlate with Prognosis in Rectal Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation without Pathological Complete Response
    Yu-Ming Huang, Hsi-Hsien Hsu, Chien-Kuo Liu, Ching-Kuo Yang, Po-Li Tsai, Tzu-Yin Tang, Shih-Ming Hsu, Yu-Jen Chen
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(17): 4947.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic and predictive value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after curative rectal cancer resection: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hytham K.S. Hamid, George N. Davis, Mario Trejo-Avila, Patrick O. Igwe, Andrés Garcia-Marín
    Surgical Oncology.2021; 37: 101556.     CrossRef
  • The prognostic utility of pre‐treatment neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte‐ratio (NLR) in colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Mate Naszai, Alina Kurjan, Timothy S. Maughan
    Cancer Medicine.2021; 10(17): 5983.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Ability of Neutrophil-Lymphocyte Ratio in Determining Tumor Staging in Colorectal Cancer
    Chirag Pereira, Jiju Mohan, Shankar Gururaj, Prajwal Chandrashekhara
    Cureus.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An inflammation index-based prediction of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma
    Yanwu Sun, Zhekun Huang, Pan Chi
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2020; 25(7): 1299.     CrossRef
Female Sex and Right-Sided Tumor Location Are Poor Prognostic Factors for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer After a Curative Resection
Jung Ho Park, Hyoung-Chul Park, Sung Chan Park, Jae Hwan Oh, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang, Seung Chul Heo, Min Jung Kim, Ji Won Park, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park, for the Seoul Colorectal Group (SECOG)
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):286-291.   Published online December 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.10.29
  • 5,944 View
  • 120 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Stage-IIIC colon cancer is an advanced disease; however, its oncologic outcomes and prognostic factors remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine the predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage-IIIC colon cancer.
Methods
From a multicenter database, we retrospectively enrolled 611 patients (355 men and 256 women) who had undergone a potentially curative resection for a stage-IIIC colon adenocarcinoma between 2003 and 2011. The primary end-point was the 5-year DFS.
Results
The median age was 62 years; 213 and 398 patients had right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (LCC), respectively. The 5-year DFS in all patients was 52.0%; median follow-up time was 35 months (range, 1–134 months). A multivariate Cox regression revealed that female sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19–1.90; P < 0.01), right-sided tumor location (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.29–2.11; P < 0.01), lymphatic invasion (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.08–2.15; P < 0.01) and a high (≥0.4) metastatic lymph node ratio (HR, 3.72; 95% CI, 2.63–5.24; P < 0.01) were independent predictors of worse 5-year DFS. Female patients with RCC were 1.79 fold more likely to experience recurrence than male patients with LCC.
Conclusion
Female sex and right-sided tumor location are associated with higher tumor recurrence rates in patients with stage-IIIC colon cancers. Aggressive treatment and close surveillance should be planned for patients in these groups.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Development and external validation of a nomogram predicting overall survival after curative resection of colon cancer
    Shuanhu Wang, Yakui Liu, Yi Shi, Jiajia Guan, Mulin Liu, Wenbin Wang
    Journal of International Medical Research.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
Perioperative Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Ratio Is a Prognostic Indicator in Patients With Stage II Colorectal Cancer
Jinsun Woo, Jungbin Kim, Inseok Park, Hyunjin Cho, Geumhee Gwak, Keun Ho Yang, Byung-Noe Bae, Ki Hwan Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(1):4-10.   Published online February 28, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.34.1.4
  • 8,036 View
  • 83 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the perioperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) ratio could be used as a determinant for adjuvant therapy after curative surgery in stage II colorectal cancer.

Methods

Data for 119 patients with stage II colorectal cancer who underwent radical surgery between 2010 and 2013 were collected. The perioperative CEA ratio was defined as the postoperative/preoperative serum CEA level, and the patients were grouped according to their perioperative CEA ratios: high ratio (≥0.5) and low ratio (<0.5). Overall survival rates were calculated, and their prognostic significances were analyzed.

Results

The overall survival rates of the high and the low perioperative CEA groups were 68.2% and 86.8%, respectively (P = 0.033). In patients with normal preoperative CEA levels (<5 ng/mL), the high perioperative CEA ratio group showed a worse survival rate than the low perioperative CEA ratio group (71.7% vs. 100.0%, P = 0.007). In patients with high preoperative CEA levels (≥5 ng/mL), the high perioperative CEA ratio group showed a worse survival rate than the low perioperative CEA ratio group (33.3% vs. 75.0%, P = 0.036). In the multivariate analysis, perioperative CEA ratio (P = 0.046), age (P = 0.034), and venous invasion (P = 0.015) were independent prognostic factors for survival.

Conclusion

The perioperative CEA ratio is a prognostic indicator for stage II colorectal cancer. Patients with normal preoperative serum CEA levels might also be considered for adjuvant therapy if their perioperative CEA ratios are higher than 0.5.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Tumor regression and immunity in combination therapy with anti-CEA chimeric antigen receptor T cells and anti-CEA-IL2 immunocytokine
    Seung E. Cha, Maciej Kujawski, Paul J. Yazaki, Christine Brown, John E. Shively
    OncoImmunology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Impact of Pretreatment Elevated and Normalized Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Resected Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients
    Jianyuan Song, Zhuhong Chen, Daxin Huang, Benhua Xu
    Cancer Management and Research.2021; Volume 13: 3713.     CrossRef
  • Association between Primary Perioperative CEA Ratio, Tumor Site, and Overall Survival in Patients with Colorectal Cancer
    Thomas A. Odeny, Nicole Farha, Hannah Hildebrandand, Jessica Allen, Wilfred Vazquez, Maximillian Martinez, Ravi Kumar Paluri, Anup Kasi
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2020; 9(12): 3848.     CrossRef
Clinical Significance of Signet-Ring-Cell Colorectal Cancer as a Prognostic Factor
Sang-Oh Yun, Yong Beom Cho, Woo Yong Lee, Hee Cheol Kim, Seong Hyeon Yun, Yoon Ah Park, Jung Wook Huh
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(6):232-238.   Published online December 31, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.6.232
  • 7,835 View
  • 55 Download
  • 30 Web of Science
  • 29 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognosis for patients with a signet-ring-cell carcinoma (SRCC) who undergo curative surgery by comparing them to patients with an adenocarcinoma (ADC), excluding a mucinous ADC.

Methods

Between September 1994 and December 2013, 14,110 patients with colorectal cancer underwent surgery and among them, 12,631 patients were enrolled in this study. 71 patients with a SRCC and 12,570 patients with a ADC were identified. We analyzed the disease-free survival and the overall survival rates before and after a 1:2 propensity score matching and evaluated those rates after stage stratification.

Results

The median follow-up durations were 48.5 months for the SRC group and 48.6 months for the ADC group. The disease-free survival rates and the overall survival rates were significantly lower in the SRC group before and after propensity score matching (P < 0.001). After stratification by stage, no differences were observed between the SRC and the ADC groups for the disease-free survival (DFS) and the overall survival (OS) rates for patients with cancer in its early stages (P = 0.913 and P = 0.380 for the DFS and the OS, respectively, in stages 0 and I, and P = 0.223 and P = 0.991 for the DFS and the OS, respectively, in stage II), but those rates were significantly lower in the SRC group for cancer in its later stages (P < 0.001, respectively in stages III and IV).

Conclusion

For cancer in advanced stages, patients with a resectable colorectal SRCC had a poorer prognosis after propensity score matching than those with an ADC did. Therefore, more intensive surveillance and closer observation should be offered to such patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer Outcomes
    Meng-Han Tsai, Dariush Shahsavari, Jie Chen, Bobak Moazzami, Subbaramia Sridhar
    Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Breaking Boundaries: An Unusual Case of Rectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Invading the Uterus and Mesentery
    Mitali Singh, Vaibhav Mane
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic implications of T stage in different pathological types of colorectal cancer: an observational study using SEER population-based data
    Nan Yao, Wenqiang Li, Jiwei Wang, Hongyuan Chu, Ning Duan, Xinyu Niu, Guoyong Yu, Jun Qu
    BMJ Open.2024; 14(2): e076579.     CrossRef
  • Systematic review of risk factors, prognosis, and management of colorectal signet-ring cell carcinoma
    Frederiek Nuytens, Vincent Drubay, Clarisse Eveno, Florence Renaud, Guillaume Piessen
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2024; 16(5): 2141.     CrossRef
  • Unraveling the complexities of colorectal cancer and its promising therapies – An updated review
    Sayan Saha, Shreya Ghosh, Suman Ghosh, Sumit Nandi, Aditi Nayak
    International Immunopharmacology.2024; 143: 113325.     CrossRef
  • Case report: Preclinical efficacy of NEDD8 and proteasome inhibitors in patient-derived models of signet ring high-grade mucinous colorectal cancer from a Lynch syndrome patient
    Erica Torchiaro, Consalvo Petti, Sabrina Arena, Francesco Sassi, Giorgia Migliardi, Alfredo Mellano, Roberta Porporato, Marco Basiricò, Loretta Gammaitoni, Enrico Berrino, Monica Montone, Giorgio Corti, Giovanni Crisafulli, Caterina Marchiò, Alberto Barde
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognosis of Different Histological Types in Patients with Stage II and III Colon Cancer
    Yasmeen Z. Qwaider, Naomi M. Sell, Caitlin E. Stafford, Chloe Boudreau, Hiroko Kunitake, Robert N. Goldstone, Rocco Ricciardi, Liliana G. Bordeianou, Christy E. Cauley, David L. Berger
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2022; 26(2): 476.     CrossRef
  • Tumor budding as a prognostic indicator in colorectal carcinoma: a retrospective study of primary colorectal carcinoma cases in a tertiary care center
    Ashini H. Shah, Amisha J. Gami, Neetal H. Desai, Jahnavi S. Gandhi, Priti P. Trivedi
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022; 13(3): 459.     CrossRef
  • The Association of Microbiome Dysbiosis With Colorectal Cancer
    Artem Artemev, Sheetal Naik, Anastasia Pougno, Prasanna Honnavar, Nandan M Shanbhag
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Simple synthesis of WO3 based activated carbon co-doped CuS composites for photocatalytic applications
    Tahir Iqbal, Maria Ashraf, Arslan Masood
    Inorganic Chemistry Communications.2022; 139: 109322.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of Long-Time Survivors in Nonmetastatic Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma: A Large Population-Based Study
    Wuguang Zhang, Wenqian Gong, Changhai Wu, Mengting Li, Xiaolong Tu, Stephen Fink
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Applications of propensity score matching: a case series of articles published in Annals of Coloproctology
    Hwa Jung Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(6): 398.     CrossRef
  • Does signet ring cell carcinoma component signify worse outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer?
    Liming Wang, Yasumitsu Hirano, Gregory Heng, Toshimasa Ishii, Hiroka Kondo, Kiyoka Hara, Nao Obara, Masahiro Asari, Takuya Kato, Shigeki Yamaguchi
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2021; 44(1): 105.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Histologic Subtype on Receipt of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Overall Survival in Stage III Colon Cancer: a Retrospective Cohort Analysis
    Benjamin D. Powers, Seth I. Felder, Iman Imanirad, Sophie Dessureault, Sean P. Dineen
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2021; 52(2): 719.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal adenocarcinomas diagnosed following a negative faecal immunochemical test show high‐risk pathological features in a colon screening programme
    Michael J. Steel, Hussam Bukhari, Laura Gentile, Jennifer Telford, David F. Schaeffer
    Histopathology.2021; 78(5): 710.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal cancer of the young displays distinct features of aggressive tumor biology: A single-center cohort study
    Matteo Mueller, Marcel André Schneider, Barla Deplazes, Daniela Cabalzar-Wondberg, Andreas Rickenbacher, Matthias Turina
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2021; 13(2): 164.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathological factors and survival outcomes of signet-ring cell and mucinous carcinoma versus adenocarcinoma of the colon and rectum: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Michael G. Fadel, George Malietzis, Vasilis Constantinides, Gianluca Pellino, Paris Tekkis, Christos Kontovounisios
    Discover Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • MRI features of signet ring rectal cancer
    Meena Suthar, Akshay D. Baheti, Suman K. Ankathi, Amit Choudhari, Purvi D. Haria, Reena Engineer, Vikas Ostwal, Mukta S. Ramadwar, Ashwin Desouza, Avanish Saklani
    Abdominal Radiology.2021; 46(12): 5536.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal cancer biomarkers and their impact on the clinical practice
    James Crespo, Ana Paula Victorino, Kelly Araujo, Luiz Henrique Araujo, Fernando Meton de Alencar Camara Vieira
    Brazilian Journal of Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Metastatic patterns and survival outcomes in patients with stage IV colon cancer: A population‐based analysis
    Jiwei Wang, Song Li, Yanna Liu, Chunquan Zhang, Honglang Li, Bin Lai
    Cancer Medicine.2020; 9(1): 361.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic factors influencing survival in patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for isolated colorectal peritoneal metastases: a systematic review and meta‐analysis
    V. Narasimhan, S. Tan, J. Kong, T. Pham, M. Michael, R. Ramsay, S. Warrier, A. Heriot
    Colorectal Disease.2020; 22(11): 1482.     CrossRef
  • Deconvolution of diffuse gastric cancer and the suppression of CD34 on the BALB/c nude mice model
    Seon-Jin Yoon, Jungmin Park, Youngmin Shin, Yuna Choi, Sahng Wook Park, Seok-Gu Kang, Hye Young Son, Yong-Min Huh
    BMC Cancer.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predictive factors of complete pathological response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer
    Rebekah M. Engel, Karen Oliva, Christine Koulis, Raymond Yap, Paul J. McMurrick
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2020; 35(9): 1759.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathological Characteristics and Mutation Spectrum of Colorectal Adenocarcinoma With Mucinous Component in a Chinese Cohort: Comparison With Classical Adenocarcinoma
    Jingci Chen, Liangrui Zhou, Jie Gao, Tao Lu, Jing Wang, Huanwen Wu, Zhiyong Liang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Signet ring cell component in pretreatment biopsy predicts pathological response to preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer
    Xue Chao, Zixian Wang, Shixun Lu, Yuhua Huang, Shengbing Zang, Peirong Ding, Huizhong Zhang, Jingping Yun
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2020; 25(9): 1653.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer in Korea: Nationwide Data from 2013 to 2018
    Sun Jin Park, Kil Yeon Lee, Suk-Hwan Lee
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2020; 52(3): 938.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of Definitive Treatment of Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma of the Rectum: Is Minimal Invasive Surgery Detrimental in Signet Ring Rectal Cancers?
    S. Raghavan, Deepak Kumar Singh, J. Rohila, A. DeSouza, R. Engineer, A. Ramaswamy, V. Ostwal, A. Saklani
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020; 11(4): 597.     CrossRef
  • Aggressive Colorectal Cancer in the Young
    Blake Read, Patricia Sylla
    Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2020; 33(05): 298.     CrossRef
  • Prognoses of different pathological subtypes of colorectal cancer at different stages: A population-based retrospective cohort study
    Xiaoli Wu, Han Lin, Shaotang Li
    BMC Gastroenterology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
Is the Location of the Tumor Another Prognostic Factor for Patients With Colon Cancer?
Myung-Kyu Jung, Ui Sup Shin, Young-Jun Ki, Yong-Bae Kim, Sun-Mi Moon, Se-Jin Sung
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(6):210-218.   Published online December 31, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.6.210
  • 5,717 View
  • 94 Download
  • 16 Web of Science
  • 16 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

In this study, we investigated both the characteristics of right colon cancer (RTCC) in comparison with those of left colon cancer (LTCC) and the impact of the location of the colon cancer on the prognosis.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the cases of 974 patients with nonmetastatic colon cancer who had undergone surgery with a curative intent from January 2001 to December 2011. RTCC was defined as a tumor located proximal to the splenic flexure. The characteristics of RTCC cancer were investigated by using descriptive analyses, and their impacts on the prognosis were assessed by using a Cox multivariate regression.

Results

Compared to LTCC, RTCC showed a female-dominant feature, and an undifferentiated pathology was more frequently observed. The number of lymph nodes retrieved from patients with RTCC was significantly higher than that retrieved from patients with LTCC. During 75 months of follow-up, peritoneal recurrence was more common in patients with RTCC than it was in patients with LTCC, and among the patients with stage III colon cancer, the disease-free and the overall survival rates were significantly worse in patients with RTCC. After adjustments with the other prognostic factors associated with colon cancer had been made, a tumor located at the right colon was found to be independently associated with poor prognosis.

Conclusion

RTCC showed unique clinicopathologic features and was associated with a poorer prognosis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Differences in the expression of CMTM3 and SSTR2 genes in right and left colon tumors: A molecular insight into colorectal cancer
    Tuğçe Binen, Etem Akbaş, Tahsin Çolak, Tuba Kara, Aslıhan Bakır, Badel İnce
    Medical Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The relationship between clinical and pathological findings and FDG - PET uptake in metastatic colorectal cancers
    Bediz Kurt İnci, Fatih Gürler, Osman Sütcüoğlu, Gözde Tahtacı, Aytuğ Üner, Ahmet Özet, Nazan Günel, Ozan Yazıcı
    Indian Journal of Cancer.2024; 61(3): 440.     CrossRef
  • Splenic flexure cancer survival: a 25‐year experience and implications for complete mesocolic excision (CME) and central vascular ligation (CVL)
    Krishanth Naidu, Pierre H. Chapuis, Kilian G. M. Brown, Charles Chan, Matthew J. F. X. Rickard, Kheng‐Seong Ng
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2023; 93(7-8): 1861.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Significance of MRE11 Overexpression in Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Vincent Ho, Liping Chung, Kate Wilkinson, Vivienne Lea, Stephanie H. Lim, Askar Abubakar, Weng Ng, Mark Lee, Tara L. Roberts, Wei Chua, Cheok Soon Lee
    Cancers.2023; 15(9): 2438.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal Cancer: Disease Process, Current Treatment Options, and Future Perspectives
    Amusa S. Adebayo, Kafilat Agbaje, Simeon K. Adesina, Oluwabukunmi Olajubutu
    Pharmaceutics.2023; 15(11): 2620.     CrossRef
  • Intertwined leukocyte balances in tumours and peripheral blood as robust predictors of right and left colorectal cancer survival
    Ramón Cantero-Cid, Karla Marina Montalbán-Hernández, Jenny Guevara, Alejandro Pascual-Iglesias, Elisa Pulido, José Carlos Casalvilla, Cristóbal Marcano, Cristina Barragán Serrano, Jaime Valentín, Gloria Cristina Bonel-Pérez, José Avendaño-Ortiz, Verónica
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2022; 14(1): 295.     CrossRef
  • Disparities in Healthcare: Evaluation of Equity in Access to Surveillance Colonoscopy After Hemicolectomy in Patients With Colon Cancer During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Ranbir Singh, Eshan Patel
    Cureus.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of prolonged postoperative ileus between laparoscopic right and left colectomy under enhanced recovery after surgery: a propensity score matching analysis
    Zhenmeng Lin, Chunkang Yang, Yi Wang, Mingfang Yan, Huizhe Zheng
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Prognostic Impact of Primary Tumor Site Differs According to the KRAS Mutational Status
    Georgios Antonios Margonis, Neda Amini, Stefan Buettner, Yuhree Kim, Jaeyun Wang, Nikolaos Andreatos, Doris Wagner, Kazunari Sasaki, Andrea Beer, Carsten Kamphues, Daisuke Morioka, Inger Marie Løes, Katsunori Imai, Jin He, Timothy M. Pawlik, Klaus Kaczire
    Annals of Surgery.2021; 273(6): 1165.     CrossRef
  • Are right-sided colectomies for neoplastic disease at increased risk of primary postoperative ileus compared to left-sided colectomies? A coarsened exact matched analysis
    Richard Garfinkle, Faisal Al-Rashid, Nancy Morin, Gabriela Ghitulescu, Julio Faria, Carol-Ann Vasilevsky, Marylise Boutros
    Surgical Endoscopy.2020; 34(12): 5304.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Heterogeneity of MRE11 Based on the Location of Primary Colorectal Cancer Is Caused by Activation of Different Immune Signals
    Chuan-Wen Fan, Maria Kopsida, You-Bin Liu, Hong Zhang, Jing-Fang Gao, Gunnar Arbman, Si-Yu-Wei Cao, Yuan Li, Zong-Guang Zhou, Xiao-Feng Sun
    Frontiers in Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Early Outcome of Enhanced Recovery Programs Versus Conventional Perioperative Care in Elective Open Left Side Colonic Carcinoma Surgery: Analysis of 80 Cases
    Emad M. Abd ElRahman, Mohamed S. Kharoub, Ahmed Shora, Nabil A. Emara, M. Ashraf Balbaa
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020; 11(3): 372.     CrossRef
  • Evaluating the distribution of the locations of colorectal cancer after appendectomy and cholecystectomy
    Szabolcs Ábrahám, Tibor Németh, Ria Benkő, Mária Matuz, Aurél Ottlakán, Dániel Váczi, Attila Paszt, Zsolt Simonka, György Lázár
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic and pathologic value of programmed death-ligand 1 expression in colonic carcinoma
    DinaO Helmy, MahmoudT El-Sabah Hussein, MohamedS Negm, MinaE Onsy
    Egyptian Journal of Pathology.2020; 40(2): 204.     CrossRef
  • Differences Regarding the Molecular Features and Gut Microbiota Between Right and Left Colon Cancer
    Kwangmin Kim, Ernes John T. Castro, Hongjin Shim, John Vincent G. Advincula, Young-Wan Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2018; 34(6): 280.     CrossRef
  • Laterality: Right-Sided and Left-Sided Colon Cancer
    Seong Kyu Baek
    Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(6): 205.     CrossRef
Prognostic Significance of Mucinous Histologic Subtype on Oncologic Outcomes in Patients With Colorectal Cancer
Sare Hosseini, Ali Mohammad Bananzadeh, Roham Salek, Mohammad Zare-Bandamiri, Ali Taghizadeh Kermani, Mohammad Mohammadianpanah
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(2):57-63.   Published online April 28, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.2.57
  • 6,414 View
  • 52 Download
  • 20 Web of Science
  • 14 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Mucinous adenocarcinomas account for about 10% of all colorectal cancers. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of mucinous histologic subtype on oncologic outcomes in patients with colorectal cancer.

Methods

This retrospective study was performed at two large tertiary university hospitals. We analyzed the characteristics, prognostic factors, and survival of patients with colorectal cancer who were treated and followed up between 2000 and 2013.

Results

Totally, 144 of 1,268 patients with a colorectal adenocarcinoma (11.4%) had mucinous histologic subtype. Statistically significant results found in this research are as follows: Mucinous histologic subtype tended to present in younger patients and to have larger tumor size, higher histologic grade, higher node stage, larger number of positive nodes, and higher rate of perineural invasion compared to nonmucinous histologic subtype. On the univariate analysis, mucinous subtype was a prognostic factor for disease-free and overall survival. On the multivariate analysis, primary tumor location, node stage and lymphatic-vascular invasion were independent prognostic factors for the local control rate. Rectal tumor location, higher disease stage, tumor grade II, and presence of lymphatic-vascular invasion had negative influences on disease-free survival, as did rectal tumor location, higher disease stage and presence of lymphatic-vascular invasion on overall survival.

Conclusion

Mucinous histologic subtype was associated with some adverse pathologic features in patients with colorectal cancer; however, it was not an independent prognostic factor for oncologic outcome.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Association between lymphovascular invasion and lymph node metastases in colon cancer: A National Cancer Database analysis
    Sameh Hany Emile, Nir Horesh, Zoe Garoufalia, Anjelli Wignakumar, Marylise Boutros, Steven D. Wexner
    Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comprehensive Overview of Molecular, Imaging, and Therapeutic Challenges in Rectal Mucinous Adenocarcinoma
    Mihaela Berar, Andra Ciocan, Emil Moiș, Luminița Furcea, Călin Popa, Răzvan Alexandru Ciocan, Florin Zaharie, Cosmin Puia, Nadim Al Hajjar, Cosmin Caraiani, Ioana Rusu, Florin Graur
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2025; 26(2): 432.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathological and prognostic features of colorectal mucinous adenocarcinomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiao Wang, Haoran Wang, Haoqing He, Kai Lv, Wenguang Yuan, Jingbo Chen, Hui Yang
    BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Multi gene mutation signatures in colorectal cancer patients: predict for the diagnosis, pathological classification, staging and prognosis
    Yan Zhuang, Hailong Wang, Da Jiang, Ying Li, Lixia Feng, Caijuan Tian, Mingyu Pu, Xiaowei Wang, Jiangyan Zhang, Yuanjing Hu, Pengfei Liu
    BMC Cancer.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathological Features and Survival of Signet-Ring Cell Carcinoma and Mucinous Adenocarcinoma of Right Colon, Left Colon, and Rectum
    Lili Zhu, Chunrun Ling, Tao Xu, Jinglin Zhang, Yujie Zhang, Yingjie Liu, Chao Fang, Lie Yang, Wen Zhuang, Rui Wang, Jie Ping, Mojin Wang
    Pathology and Oncology Research.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Identification of Potential Biomarkers and Biological Pathways for Poor Clinical Outcome in Mucinous Colorectal Adenocarcinoma
    Chang Woo Kim, Jae Myung Cha, Min Seob Kwak
    Cancers.2021; 13(13): 3280.     CrossRef
  • Clinical significance of mucinous component in colorectal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched study
    Chuanwang Yan, Hui Yang, Lili Chen, Ran Liu, Wei Shang, Wenguang Yuan, Fei Yang, Qing Sun, Lijian Xia
    BMC Cancer.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Incidence and prognosis of pulmonary metastasis in colorectal cancer: a population-based study
    Yizhi Ge, Shijun Lei, Bo Cai, Xiang Gao, Guobin Wang, Lin Wang, Zheng Wang
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2020; 35(2): 223.     CrossRef
  • Association between aberrant dynein cytoplasmic�1 light intermediate chain�1 expression levels, mucins and chemosensitivity in colorectal cancer
    Chun‑Chao Chang, Kuo‑Ching Chao, Chi‑Jung Huang, Chih‑Sheng Hung, Yen‑Chieh Wang
    Molecular Medicine Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Clinical impact of non-predominant histopathological subtypes on the long-term prognosis of colorectal cancer patients in Japan
    Heita Ozawa, Shinichi Yamauchi, Hiroki Nakanishi, Junichi Sakamoto, Shin Fujita, Kenichi Sugihara
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2020; 35(12): 2257.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Significance of Mucinous Histology on Pathologic Complete Response Rate Following Capecitabine-Based Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Rectal Cancer: a Comparative Study
    Sare Hosseini, NamPhong Nguyen, Mohammad Mohammadianpanah, Sepideh Mirzaei, Ali Mohammad Bananzadeh
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2019; 50(4): 716.     CrossRef
  • Impact of histological subtype on the prognosis of patients undergoing surgery for colon cancer
    Fabio Bagante, Gaya Spolverato, Eliza Beal, Katiuscha Merath, Qinyu Chen, Ozgür Akgül, Robert A. Anders, Timothy M. Pawlik
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018; 117(7): 1355.     CrossRef
  • SCF/c-KIT Signaling Increased Mucin2 Production by Maintaining Atoh1 Expression in Mucinous Colorectal Adenocarcinoma
    Ping Shen, Shu Yang, Haimei Sun, Guilan Li, Bo Wu, Fengqing Ji, Tingyi Sun, Deshan Zhou
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2018; 19(5): 1541.     CrossRef
  • Mucinous Subtype in Patients With Colorectal Cancer
    Hyung Jin Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(2): 44.     CrossRef
Expressions and Clinical Significances of Angiopoietin-1, Angiopoietin-2, and Tie-2 Receptor in Patients With Colorectal Cancer
Sunghoon Hong, Hae Il Jung, Tae Sung Ahn, Han-Jo Kim, Kyu-Taek Lee, Moo-Jun Baek, Sang-Byung Bae
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(1):9-15.   Published online February 28, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.1.9
  • 5,565 View
  • 55 Download
  • 17 Web of Science
  • 16 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Angiopoietin-1 (Ang-1) plays a crucial role in vascular and hematopoietic development, mainly through its cognate receptor, Tie-2. Increased levels of Ang-2 have been shown to be correlated with abnormal tumor angiogenesis in several malignancies. Hence, we estimated the increased expression of Ang-2 relative to Ang-1 in patients with colorectal cancer and correlated our finding with prognosis in order to investigate the relationships between the expressions of Ang-1/Ang-2/Tie-2 receptor and the clinical parameters or overall survival of such patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 114 tissue samples from patients with colorectal cancer by using immunohistochemistry (IHC) to examine Ang-1, Ang-2, and Tie-2 expressions and to investigate the relationship between those expressions and clinical parameters or overall survival of such patients. A Western blot analysis was used for Ang-2 expression.

Results

IHC staining showed a link between Ang-1 and Tie-2 (P = 0.018), as well as meaningful correlations between Ang-2 and Tie-2 receptor (P = 0.022) and between lymph-node metastasis and Ang-2 (P = 0.025). The stronger the IHC staining for Ang-2 expression was, the shorter the cumulative survival was (P = 0.016).

Conclusion

A relationship was found to exist between Ang-2 and Tie-2 expressions. The Ang-2 was correlated with lymph-node metastasis, and high expression of Ang-2 was indicative of poor overall survival. These findings suggest that Ang-2 is a useful prognostic marker in the management of patients with colorectal cancer. In addition, we suggest that Ang/Tie-2 signaling plays an important role in the progression of colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Impact of the Renin-Angiotensin System on the Development of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
    森 曹
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2025; 15(01): 1396.     CrossRef
  • The BMI1-Angiopoietin-2 axis as an independent prognostic factor in colorectal cancer
    Yin-Chou Hsu, Chi-Wen Luo, Shu-Jyuan Chang, Chiao-Ying Lai, Yu-Tzu Yang, Yi-Zi Chen, Mei-Hsiang Hsu, Cheuk-Kwan Sun, Mei-Ren Pan
    Experimental Cell Research.2025; 450(1): 114622.     CrossRef
  • Putative Role of Tie2-Expressing Monocytes/Macrophages in Colorectal Cancer Progression Through Enhancement of Angiogenesis and Metastasis
    Eman Amin M. Ali, Alaa Muayad Altaie, Iman M. Talaat, Rifat Hamoudi
    Cancers.2025; 17(17): 2856.     CrossRef
  • Differential expression of angiogenesis-related genes ‘VEGF’ and ‘angiopoietin-1’ in metastatic and EMAST-positive colorectal cancer patients
    Amir Torshizi Esfahani, Somayeh Mohammadpour, Pooya Jalali, Alireza Yaghoobi, Raana Karimpour, Soha Torkamani, Ali Pardakhtchi, Zahra Salehi, Ehsan Nazemalhosseini-Mojarad
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Platelet Angiopoietin-1 Protects Against Murine Models of Tumor Metastasis
    Harvey G. Roweth, Isabelle C. Becker, Michael W. Malloy, Emily M. Clarke, Sophie A. Munn, Priya L. Kumar, Ivan Aivasovsky, Kobe Tray, Alec A. Schmaier, Elisabeth M. Battinelli
    Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology.2024; 44(9): 2024.     CrossRef
  • KRAS mutation-driven angiopoietin 2 bestows anti-VEGF resistance in epithelial carcinomas
    Kayoko Hosaka, Patrik Andersson, Jieyu Wu, Xingkang He, Qiqiao Du, Xu Jing, Takahiro Seki, Juan Gao, Yin Zhang, Xiaoting Sun, Ping Huang, Yunlong Yang, Minghua Ge, Yihai Cao
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Angiopoietin-2 as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Incurable Stage IV Colorectal Cancer
    Shinya Munakata, Takae Ueyama, Haruna Ishihara, Hiromitsu Komiyama, Ryoichi Tsukamoto, Masaya Kawai, Makoto Takahashi, Yutaka Kojima, Yuichi Tomiki, Kazuhiro Sakamoto
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2021; 52(1): 237.     CrossRef
  • Dual Antiangiogenesis Agents Bevacizumab Plus Trebananib, without Chemotherapy, in First-line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Results of a Phase II Study
    Jennifer Mooi, Fiona Chionh, Peter Savas, Jessica Da Gama Duarte, Geoffrey Chong, Stephen Brown, Rachel Wong, Timothy J. Price, Alysson Wann, Effie Skrinos, John M. Mariadason, Niall C. Tebbutt
    Clinical Cancer Research.2021; 27(8): 2159.     CrossRef
  • 6-Gingerol delays tumorigenesis in benzo[a]pyrene and dextran sulphate sodium-induced colorectal cancer in mice
    Ebenezer O. Farombi, Babajide O. Ajayi, Isaac A. Adedara
    Food and Chemical Toxicology.2020; 142: 111483.     CrossRef
  • High expression of Tie-2 predicts poor prognosis in primary high grade serous ovarian cancer
    Minna Sopo, Hanna Sallinen, Kirsi Hämäläinen, Annukka Kivelä, Seppo Ylä-Herttuala, Veli-Matti Kosma, Leea Keski-Nisula, Maarit Anttila, Elizabeth Christie
    PLOS ONE.2020; 15(11): e0241484.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of plasma angiopoietin‐2 and vascular endothelial growth factor in healthy dogs and dogs with systemic inflammatory response syndrome or sepsis
    Maya König, Alice Nentwig, Eliane Marti, Jelena Mirkovitch, Katja‐Nicole Adamik, Simone Schuller
    Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine.2019; 33(2): 569.     CrossRef
  • Targeting Receptor Kinases in Colorectal Cancer
    Marilina García-Aranda, Maximino Redondo
    Cancers.2019; 11(4): 433.     CrossRef
  • Gene expression and promoter methylation of angiogenic and lymphangiogenic factors as prognostic markers in melanoma
    Ana Carolina Monteiro, Julienne K. Muenzner, Fernando Andrade, Flávia Eichemberger Rius, Christian Ostalecki, Carol I. Geppert, Abbas Agaimy, Arndt Hartmann, André Fujita, Regine Schneider‐Stock, Miriam Galvonas Jasiulionis
    Molecular Oncology.2019; 13(6): 1433.     CrossRef
  • “Vessels in the Storm”: Searching for Prognostic and Predictive Angiogenic Factors in Colorectal Cancer
    Adriano Angelucci, Simona Delle Monache, Alessio Cortellini, Monica Di Padova, Corrado Ficorella
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2018; 19(1): 299.     CrossRef
  • Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) is a useful serum tumor marker for liver cancer in the Chinese population
    Yuxin Chen, Yanping Wu, Xiao Zhang, Hong Zeng, Ya Liu, Qi Wu, Yan Chen, GuoQing Zhu, Qiuhui Pan, Lei Jin, Lin Guo, Fenyong Sun
    Clinica Chimica Acta.2018; 478: 18.     CrossRef
  • Efforts to Find Targets Involving Angiogenesis: Step to Improve the Efficacy of Target Therapy in the Era of Colorectal Cancer Treatment
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(1): 1.     CrossRef
Role of Peritoneal Lavage Cytology and Prediction of Prognosis and Peritoneal Recurrence After Curative Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
Sung Joon Bae, Ui Sup Shin, Young-Jun Ki, Sang Sik Cho, Sun Mi Moon, Sun Hoo Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(6):266-273.   Published online December 31, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.6.266
  • 6,527 View
  • 56 Download
  • 13 Web of Science
  • 12 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

In colorectal cancer, the role of detecting free malignant cells from peritoneal lavage is currently unclear. In this study, we investigated the positive rate of free malignant cells in peritoneal lavage fluid and their predictive value for prognosis and peritoneal recurrence after a curative resection.

Methods

From October 2009 to December 2011, in a prospective manner, we performed cytologic examinations of peritoneal lavage fluid obtained just after the abdominal incision from 145 patients who underwent curative surgery for colorectal cancer. We used proportional hazard regression models to analyze the predictive role of positive cytology for peritoneal recurrence and survival.

Results

Among total 145 patients, six patients (4.1%) showed positive cytology. During the median follow-up of 32 months (range, 8-49 months), 27 patients (18.6%) developed recurrence. Among them, 5 patients (3.4%) showed peritoneal carcinomatosis. In the multivariate analysis, positive cytology was an independent predictive factor for peritoneal recurrence (hazard ratio [HR], 136.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 12.2-1,531.9; P < 0.0001) and an independent poor prognostic factor for overall survival (HR, 11.4; 95% CI, 1.8-72.0; P = 0.009) and for disease-free survival (HR, 11.1; 95% CI, 3.4-35.8; P < 0.0001).

Conclusion

Positive cytology of peritoneal fluid was significantly associated with peritoneal recurrence and worse survival in patients undergoing curative surgery for colorectal cancer. Peritoneal cytology might be a useful tool for selecting patients who need intraperitoneal or systemic chemotherapy.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Intraoperative flow cytometry in detecting free carcinoma cells in peritoneal lavage fluid of gastric carcinoma cases
    Thulasi Raman Ramalingam, Bharaneedharan Marimuthu, Harsha N. Rasheed, Archana Lakshmanan, Swetha Lakshmi Narla, Lakshman Vaidhyanathan, Ajit Pai
    Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Peritoneal Lavage Cytology Predicts Peritoneal Metastasis and is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Dewei Kong, Yingjie Li, Shenyi Yin, Yunfei Tan, Boyang Qu, Lei Huang, Jianzhong Jeff Xi, Aiwen Wu
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors for Positive Peritoneal Lavage Cytology in Stage I to III Colon Cancer: A Prospective Observational Study
    Radha Raman Mondal, Subrata Sahu, Sudip Haldar, Samir Bhattacharyya, Arnab Gupta
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development and validation of a nomogram to predict overall survival in patients with incidental gallbladder cancer: A retrospective cohort study
    Zhi-Hua Xie, Xuebing Shi, Ming-Qi Liu, Jinghan Wang, Yong Yu, Ji-Xiang Zhang, Kai-Jian Chu, Wei Li, Rui-Liang Ge, Qing-Bao Cheng, Xiao-Qing Jiang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy with Regorafenib on IL-6 and TNF-α Levels and Peritoneal Cytology: Experimental Study in Rats with Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis
    Stefanos Bitsianis, Ioannis Mantzoros, Elissavet Anestiadou, Panagiotis Christidis, Christos Chatzakis, Konstantinos Zapsalis, Savvas Symeonidis, Georgios Ntampakis, Kalliopi Domvri, Anastasia Tsakona, Chryssa Bekiari, Orestis Ioannidis, Stamatios Aggelop
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(23): 7267.     CrossRef
  • Conventional peritoneal cytology lacks the prognostic significance of detecting local or peritoneal recurrence in colorectal cancer: An Egyptian experience
    Mohamed Shalaby, Tarek S El Baradie, Mohamed Salama, Hebat A M Shaaban, Rasha M Allam, Ehab O.A. Hafiz, Mohamed Aly Abdelhamed, Amr Attia
    JGH Open.2021; 5(2): 264.     CrossRef
  • Interleukin 10 level in the peritoneal cavity is a prognostic marker for peritoneal recurrence of T4 colorectal cancer
    Seung-Yong Jeong, Byeong Geon Jeon, Ji-Eun Kim, Rumi Shin, Hye Seong Ahn, Heejin Jin, Seung Chul Heo
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for developing peritoneal metastases after curative surgery for colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Yuanxin Zhang, Xiusen Qin, Wenle Chen, Duo Liu, Jian Luo, Huaiming Wang, Hui Wang
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(11): 2846.     CrossRef
  • Treatment for Peritoneal Metastasis of Patients With Colorectal Cancer
    Young Jin Kim, Chang Hyun Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 425.     CrossRef
  • Pathophysiology of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis: Role of the peritoneum
    Lieselotte Lemoine, Paul Sugarbaker, Kurt Van der Speeten
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(34): 7692.     CrossRef
  • The preoperative platelet to lymphocyte ratio is a prognostic marker in patients with stage II colorectal cancer
    Tsuyoshi Ozawa, Soichiro Ishihara, Takeshi Nishikawa, Toshiaki Tanaka, Junichiro Tanaka, Tomomichi Kiyomatsu, Keisuke Hata, Kazushige Kawai, Hiroaki Nozawa, Shinsuke Kazama, Hironori Yamaguchi, Eiji Sunami, Joji Kitayama, Toshiaki Watanabe
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2015; 30(9): 1165.     CrossRef
  • Intraoperative Peritoneal Lavage: Limitations of Current Evidence for Clinical Implementation
    Duck-Woo Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(6): 248.     CrossRef
Prognostic Implications of Primary Tumor Resection in Stage IVB Colorectal Cancer in Elderly Patients
Heui-June Ahn, Ho-Suk Oh, Yongchel Ahn, Sang Jin Lee, Hyun Joong Kim, Moon Ho Kim, Dae-Woon Eom, Jae Young Kwak, Myoung Sik Han, Jae Seok Song
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(4):175-181.   Published online August 26, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.4.175
  • 5,173 View
  • 47 Download
  • 10 Web of Science
  • 10 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The aim of this study was to identify prognostic factors in stage IVB colorectal cancer in elderly patients, focusing on the influence of treatment modalities, including palliative chemotherapy and primary tumor resection.

Methods

A cohort of 64 patients aged over 65 years who presented with stage IVB colorectal cancer at the Gangneung Asan Hospital between July 1, 2001, and December 31, 2009, was analyzed. Demographics, tumor location, tumor grade, performance status, levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), level of aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and distant metastatic site at diagnosis were analyzed. Using the treatment histories, we analyzed the prognostic implications of palliative chemotherapy and surgical resection of the primary tumor retrospectively.

Results

The cohort consisted of 30 male (46.9%) and 34 female patients (53.1%); the median age was 76.5 years. Primary tumor resection was done on 28 patients (43.8%); 36 patients (56.2%) were categorized in the nonresection group. The median survival times were 12.43 months in the resection group and 3.58 months in the nonresection group (P < 0.001). Gender, level of CEA, level of AST, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, tumor location, and presence of liver metastasis also showed significant differences in overall survival. On multivariate analysis, male gender, higher level of CEA, higher AST level, and no primary tumor resection were independent poor prognostic factors. In particular, nonresection of the primary tumor was the most potent/poor prognostic factor in the elderly-patient study group (P = 0.001; 95% confidence interval, 2.33 to 21.99; hazard ratio, 7.16).

Conclusion

In stage IVB colorectal cancer in elderly patients, resection of the primary tumor may enhance survival.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Primary Tumor Resection for Metastatic Colorectal, Gastric and Pancreatic Cancer Patients: In Search of Scientific Evidence to Inform Clinical Practice
    Valentina Fanotto, Francesca Salani, Caterina Vivaldi, Mario Scartozzi, Dario Ribero, Marco Puzzoni, Francesco Montagnani, Francesco Leone, Enrico Vasile, Maria Bencivenga, Giovanni De Manzoni, Debora Basile, Lorenzo Fornaro, Gianluca Masi, Giuseppe April
    Cancers.2023; 15(3): 900.     CrossRef
  • The association of blood biomarkers with treatment response and adverse health outcomes in older patients with solid tumors: A systematic review
    Yara van Holstein, P. Janne E. van den Berkmortel, Stella Trompet, Diana van Heemst, Frederiek van den Bos, Marieke Roemeling-van Rhijn, Nienke A. de Glas, Marian Beekman, P. Eline Slagboom, Johanneke E.A. Portielje, Simon P. Mooijaart, Barbara C. van Mun
    Journal of Geriatric Oncology.2023; 14(7): 101567.     CrossRef
  • Survival for patients with metastatic colon cancer underwent cytoreductive colectomy in the era of rapid development of anticancer drugs: A real-world analysis based on updated population dataset of 2004–2018
    Guangran Meng, Shengtao Yang, Feixiang Chen
    Frontiers in Pharmacology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Can the De Ritis Ratio (AST/ALT) be used to predict colon cancer stages?
    Saygın ALTINER, Enes CEBECİ, Bedri Burak SUCU, Mert ÇÖL, Ender ERGÜDER, Yılmaz ÜNAL, Salih TUNCAL, Mevlüt Recep PEKCİCİ
    Ahi Evran Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Provisional Clinical Opinions (PCOs) Recommended by the Surgical Treatment Working Group for Vulnerable Elderly Patients in Colorectal Cancer: Clinical Questions with Answers
    Junichi Nishimura, Yoshio Yoshida, Chie Tanaka, Keiji Matsuda, Shiro Oka, Kohei Murata, Ju Mizuno, Yoichiro Yoshida
    Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2021; 74(7): 401.     CrossRef
  • Sixty-Day Mortality of Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Randomized to Systemic Treatment vs Primary Tumor Resection Followed by Systemic Treatment
    Dave E. W. van der Kruijssen, Sjoerd G. Elias, Geraldine R. Vink, Karlijn L. van Rooijen, Jorine ‘t Lam-Boer, Linda Mol, Cornelis J. A. Punt, Johannes H. W. de Wilt, Miriam Koopman, Gijs J.D. van Acker, Rahim Altaf, Kees van Arkel, Coen I.M. Baeten, Sandr
    JAMA Surgery.2021; 156(12): 1093.     CrossRef
  • Primary Tumor Resection in Patients with Incurable Localized or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis
    Constantinos Simillis, Eliana Kalakouti, Thalia Afxentiou, Christos Kontovounisios, Jason J. Smith, David Cunningham, Michel Adamina, Paris P. Tekkis
    World Journal of Surgery.2019; 43(7): 1829.     CrossRef
  • Meta-analysis of outcomes following resection of the primary tumour in patients presenting with metastatic colorectal cancer
    U Nitsche, C Stöß, L Stecher, D Wilhelm, H Friess, G O Ceyhan
    Journal of British Surgery.2018; 105(7): 784.     CrossRef
  • A systematic analysis highlighting deficiencies in reported outcomes for patients with stage IV colorectal cancer undergoing palliative resection of the primary tumour
    Deena P. Harji, Abigail Vallance, Jenny Selgimann, Simon Bach, Faheez Mohamed, Julia Brown, Nicola Fearnhead
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018; 44(10): 1469.     CrossRef
  • Paradigm Shift in the Treatment of Elderly Patients With Unresectable Stage IV Colorectal Cancer
    Nam Kyu Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(4): 155.     CrossRef
Is Microsatellite Instability Really a Good Prognostic Factor of Colorectal Cancer?
Ui Sup Shin, Sang Sik Cho, Sun Mi Moon, Sun Hoo Park, Sun Hee Jee, Eun-Joo Jung, Dae-Yong Hwang
Ann Coloproctol. 2014;30(1):28-34.   Published online February 28, 2014
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.1.28
  • 7,144 View
  • 43 Download
  • 34 Web of Science
  • 26 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathologic features of and the prognosis for colorectal cancers (CRCs) with microsatellite instabilities (MSIs).

Methods

Between 2006 and 2009, genotyping was performed on 245 patients with stage II/III CRCs to establish the MSI status. The clinicopathologic differences and the prognostic value of MSI were analyzed. The median follow-up period was 38 months (range, 7-68 months).

Results

Of the total 245 patients, 20 (8.2%) had MSI-high (H) and 225 (91.8%) had MSI-low (L) or stable (S) CRCs. Adjuvant chemotherapies were performed on 101 stage II (87.8%) and 107 stage III patients (82.3%). Patients with MSI-H CRCs more frequently had a family history of colon cancer (10% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.003), more frequently had a cancer located at the proximal colon (90.0% vs. 19.1%, P < 0.0001), and more often showed a mucinous phenotype or poor differentiation (35.0% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.001). Despite less frequent lymph node metastasis (25% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.01), the number of retrieved lymph nodes was higher (26.3 ± 13.1 vs. 20.7 ± 1.2, P = 0.04) in the MSI-H group. The overall survival and the disease-free survival (DFS) did not differ with respect to MSI status. However, in the stage II subgroup, the DFS for patients with MSI-H CRCs was significantly worse (72.2% vs. 90.7%, P = 0.03). The multivariate analysis performed on this subgroup revealed that MSI-H was an independent poor prognostic factor (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-15.6, P = 0.046).

Conclusion

MSI-H CRCs had distinct clinicopathologic features, and MSI-H was an independent poor prognostic factor in stage II CRCs. Considering the majority of stage II patients were administrated adjuvant chemotherapy, the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for treating MSI CRCs might be different from that for treating MSI-L/S tumors.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Reassessing the Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Metastasis in Deficient Mismatch Repair Colorectal Cancer
    Zilan Ye, Dakui Luo, Fan Chen, Jiayu Chen, Zezhi Shan, Junyong Weng, Yu Zhang, Qingguo Li, Xinxiang Li
    Current Oncology.2025; 32(5): 254.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of negative lymph node count in microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer
    Xuan Dai, Zhujiang Dai, Jihong Fu, Zhonglin Liang, Peng Du, Tingyu Wu
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Oncological characteristics, treatments and prognostic outcomes in MMR-deficient colorectal cancer
    Wen-Xuan Fan, Fei Su, Yan Zhang, Xiao-Ling Zhang, Yun-Yi Du, Yang-Jun Gao, Wei-Ling Li, Wen-Qing Hu, Jun Zhao
    Biomarker Research.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Exploring the value of multiple preprocessors and classifiers in constructing models for predicting microsatellite instability status in colorectal cancer
    Yi Ma, Zhihao Shi, Ying Wei, Feng Shi, Guochu Qin, Zhengyang Zhou
    Scientific Reports.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The prognostic significance of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer: a Swedish multi-center study
    Petri Rantanen, Anne Keränen, Shabane Barot, Sam Ghazi, Annelie Liljegren, Caroline Nordenvall, Annika Lindblom, Ulrik Lindforss
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Preoperative albumin–bilirubin score as a prognostic indicator in patients with stage III colon cancer
    Hyun Gu Lee, Seok-Byung Lim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Jin Cheon Kim
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Radiomics features based on internal and marginal areas of the tumor for the preoperative prediction of microsatellite instability status in colorectal cancer
    Yi Ma, Changsong Lin, Song Liu, Ying Wei, Changfeng Ji, Feng Shi, Fan Lin, Zhengyang Zhou
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Anatomical Distribution of Colon Cancer: A Retrospective 10-Year Study to Evaluate Rightward Shift in Two Referral Hospitals in Iran
    Ahmad R Mafi, Shima Azimi Oliaei, Ramin Heshmat, Hossein Yahyazadeh, Ali G Motlagh
    International Journal of Cancer Management.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current status on microsatellite instability, prognosis and adjuvant therapy in colon cancer: A nationwide survey of medical oncologists, colorectal surgeons and gastrointestinal pathologists
    James W. T. Toh, Hema Mahajan, Pierre Chapuis, Kevin Spring
    Cancer Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Rate of dissemination and prognosis in early and advanced stage colorectal cancer based on microsatellite instability status: systematic review and meta-analysis
    James W. T. Toh, Kevin Phan, Faizur Reza, Pierre Chapuis, Kevin J. Spring
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(8): 1573.     CrossRef
  • Computed Tomography-Based Radiomics Model to Preoperatively Predict Microsatellite Instability Status in Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Study
    Zhi Li, Qi Zhong, Liang Zhang, Minhong Wang, Wenbo Xiao, Feng Cui, Fang Yu, Chencui Huang, Zhan Feng
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Colon cancer patients with mismatch repair deficiency are more likely to present as acute surgical cases
    Ioannis Gkekas, Jan Novotny, Tuomas Kaprio, Ines Beilmann-Lehtonen, Pavel Fabian, Sofia Edin, Karin Strigård, Tomas Svoboda, Jaana Hagström, Lucie Barsova, Tomas Jirasek, Caj Haglund, Richard Palmqvist, Ulf Gunnarsson
    European Journal of Cancer.2021; 157: 1.     CrossRef
  • Pathological Features and Prognostication in Colorectal Cancer
    Kabytto Chen, Geoffrey Collins, Henry Wang, James Wei Tatt Toh
    Current Oncology.2021; 28(6): 5356.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic and predictive role of DNA mismatch repair status in stage II‐III colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Zhujun Deng, Yun Qin, Jing Wang, Gang Wang, Xiaoqiang Lang, Juan Jiang, Kang Xie, Wengeng Zhang, Heng Xu, Yang Shu, Yan Zhang
    Clinical Genetics.2020; 97(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Implication of Microsatellite Instability in Chinese Cohort of Human Cancers


    Meiying Cui, Pan Li, Ying Mao, Lan Zhang, Peiyi Xia, Enjie Liu, Weiwei Wang, Jianying Zhang, Guozhong Jiang, Wencai Li
    Cancer Management and Research.2020; Volume 12: 10287.     CrossRef
  • Small RNA expression from viruses, bacteria and human miRNAs in colon cancer tissue and its association with microsatellite instability and tumor location
    Robin Mjelle, Wenche Sjursen, Liv Thommesen, Pål Sætrom, Eva Hofsli
    BMC Cancer.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Long-Term Outcomes of Microsatellite Instability Status in an Asian Cohort of Sporadic Colorectal Cancers
    Winson Jianhong Tan, Julie Liana Hamzah, Sanchalika Acharyya, Fung Joon Foo, Kiat Hon Lim, Iain Bee Huat Tan, Choong Leong Tang, Min Hoe Chew
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2018; 49(3): 311.     CrossRef
  • Distinct clinical outcomes of two CIMP-positive colorectal cancer subtypes based on a revised CIMP classification system
    Jeong Mo Bae, Jung Ho Kim, Yoonjin Kwak, Dae-Won Lee, Yongjun Cha, Xianyu Wen, Tae Hun Lee, Nam-Yun Cho, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park, Sae Won Han, Hye Seung Lee, Tae-You Kim, Gyeong Hoon Kang
    British Journal of Cancer.2017; 116(8): 1012.     CrossRef
  • Investigation of correlation between mutational status in key EGFR signaling genes and prognosis of stage II colorectal cancer
    Li Li, Bei-Bei Ni, Qing-Hua Zhong, Yan-Hui Liu, Ming-Hui Zhang, Ke-Ping Zhang, Dai-Ci Chen, Lei Wang
    Future Oncology.2017; 13(17): 1473.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of oncological outcomes of right-sided colon cancer versus left-sided colon cancer after curative resection
    Dae Ro Lim, Jung Kul Kuk, Taehyung Kim, Eung Jin Shin
    Medicine.2017; 96(42): e8241.     CrossRef
  • Downregulation of acetyl-CoA synthetase 2 is a metabolic hallmark of tumor progression and aggressiveness in colorectal carcinoma
    Jeong Mo Bae, Jung Ho Kim, Hyeon Jeong Oh, Hye Eun Park, Tae Hun Lee, Nam-Yun Cho, Gyeong Hoon Kang
    Modern Pathology.2017; 30(2): 267.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic relevance of microsatellite instability in pT3N0M0 colon cancer: a population-based study
    Francesco Iachetta, Federica Domati, Luca Reggiani-Bonetti, Valeria Barresi, Giulia Magnani, Luigi Marcheselli, Claudia Cirilli, Monica Pedroni
    Internal and Emergency Medicine.2016; 11(1): 41.     CrossRef
  • Clinical, histological, and molecular risk factors for cancer recurrence in patients with stage II colon cancer
    Yann Touchefeu, Marie Provost-Dewitte, Thierry Lecomte, Alain Morel, Isabelle Valo, Jean-François Mosnier, Céline Bossard, Juliette Eugène, Emilie Duchalais, Jérôme Chetritt, Serge Guyetant, Stéphane Bézieau, Hélène Senellart, Morgane Caulet, Estelle Cauc
    European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology.2016; 28(12): 1394.     CrossRef
  • Microsatellite instability is associated with reduced disease specific survival in stage III colon cancer
    H.M. Mohan, E. Ryan, I. Balasubramanian, R. Kennelly, R. Geraghty, F. Sclafani, D. Fennelly, R. McDermott, E.J. Ryan, D. O'Donoghue, J.M.P. Hyland, S.T. Martin, P.R. O'Connell, D. Gibbons, Des Winter, K. Sheahan
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO).2016; 42(11): 1680.     CrossRef
  • Different treatment strategies and molecular features between right-sided and left-sided colon cancers
    Hong Shen
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2015; 21(21): 6470.     CrossRef
  • Is a Microsatellite Instability Still Useful for Tailored Treatment in Stage II and III Colon Cancer?
    Nam Kyu Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(1): 5.     CrossRef
Optimal Time of Initiating Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Curative Surgery in Colorectal Cancer Patients
Kyu Min Kang, Kyung Sook Hong, Gyoung Tae Noh, Bo-Young Oh, Soon Sup Chung, Ryung-Ah Lee, Kwang Ho Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(4):150-154.   Published online August 29, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.4.150
  • 8,303 View
  • 41 Download
  • 14 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Adjuvant chemotherapy is routinely recommended for locally advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). There are very few data for the optimal starting date of adjuvant chemotherapy after the surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of earlier adoption of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery for stage III CRC.

Methods

In this study, 159 patients with stage III CRC, who had undergone a curative resection, were enrolled retrospectively. Patients were categorized into 3 groups representing different timings to initiate the chemotherapy; less than 2 weeks (group 1), 3 to 4 weeks (group 2), and more than 5 weeks (group 3). The overall survival rate (OS) and the relapse-free survival rate (RFS) were analyzed to evaluate the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy.

Results

The 5-year OSs of the patients were 73.7% in group 1, 67.0% in group 2, and 55.2% in group 3. The 5-year RFSs of the patients were 48.8% in group 1, 64.7% in group 2, and 57.1% in group 3. There were no significant differences in either the OS or the RFS (P = 0.200, P = 0.405).

Conclusion

Starting chemotherapy earlier than 6 weeks after surgery does not show any significant difference. Thus, although adjuvant chemotherapy should preferably begin within 6 weeks, the starting date should not necessarily be hastened, and the patient's general condition should be taken into consideration.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Optimal timing of cancer treatments: a call for emerging evidence from clinical trials and real-world studies
    Jianrong Zhang, Rebecca Venchiarutti, Xiaofei Wang, Qihua He
    British Journal of Cancer.2025; 132(12): 1085.     CrossRef
  • Minimally Invasive Approach Provides Oncological Benefit in Patients with High Risk of Very Early Recurrence (VER) After Surgery for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA)
    Francesca Ratti, Cecilia Maina, Lucrezia Clocchiatti, Rebecca Marino, Federica Pedica, Andrea Casadei Gardini, Francesco De Cobelli, Luca Antonio Maria Aldrighetti
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(4): 2557.     CrossRef
  • The optimal time of starting adjuvant chemotherapy after curative surgery in patients with colorectal cancer
    Yuchong Yang, Yao Lu, Hui Tan, Ming Bai, Xia Wang, Shaohua Ge, Tao Ning, Le Zhang, Jingjing Duan, Yansha Sun, Rui Liu, Hongli Li, Yi Ba, Ting Deng
    BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 is associated with poor prognosis after curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage III colon cancer
    Ji Hyeong Song, Myung Sun Lee, Eun Young Cha, Kyung Ha Lee, Ji Yeon Kim, Jin Soo Kim
    Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 18(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Impact of the Time Interval Between Primary Debulking Surgery and Start of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
    Hao Lin, Wen-Hsin Chen, Chen-Hsuan Wu, Yu-Che Ou, Yu-Jen Chen, Ying-Yi Chen, Yu-Han Lin, Hung-Chun Fu
    Cancer Management and Research.2021; Volume 13: 5413.     CrossRef
  • Bevacizumab and erlotinib versus bevacizumab for colorectal cancer treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sara Kaveh, Parvin Ebrahimi, Aziz Rezapour, Masoud Mozafari, Kourosh Sayehmiri
    International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy.2019; 41(1): 30.     CrossRef
  • Timing of Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival in Colorectal, Gastric, and Pancreatic Cancer. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Fausto Petrelli, Alberto Zaniboni, Antonio Ghidini, Michele Ghidini, Luca Turati, Claudio Pizzo, Margherita Ratti, Michela Libertini, Gianluca Tomasello
    Cancers.2019; 11(4): 550.     CrossRef
  • Safety and feasibility of in-hospital early chemotherapy initiation after surgery in patients with stage II–IV colon cancer
    Jeonghyun Kang, Su-Weon Chong, Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee
    Medicine.2019; 98(18): e15371.     CrossRef
  • Surgical stress response and promotion of metastasis in colorectal cancer: a complex and heterogeneous process
    Corina Behrenbruch, Carolyn Shembrey, Sophie Paquet-Fifield, Christina Mølck, Hyun-Jung Cho, Michael Michael, Benjamin N. J. Thomson, Alexander G. Heriot, Frédéric Hollande
    Clinical & Experimental Metastasis.2018; 35(4): 333.     CrossRef
  • Intensity modulated radiotherapy delivers competitive local control rate with limited acute toxicity in the adjuvant treatment of rectal cancer
    Cheng-Yen Lee, Chih-Chia Chang, Hsin-Yi Yang, Pin-Yi Chiang, Yuk-Wah Tsang
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2018; 48(7): 653.     CrossRef
  • Molecular analysis of sentinel lymph node in colon carcinomas by one-step nucleic acid amplification (OSNA) reduces time to adjuvant chemotherapy interval
    Alix Marhic, Jean-François Tremblay, Rachid Kaci, Thierry André, Clarisse Eveno, Marc Pocard
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2017; 49(8): 924.     CrossRef
  • Timely initiation of chemotherapy: a systematic literature review of six priority cancers – results and recommendations for clinical practice
    M. Alexander, R. Blum, K. Burbury, J. Coutsouvelis, M. Dooley, O. Fazil, T. Griffiths, H. Ismail, S. Joshi, N. Love, S. Opat, P. Parente, N. Porter, E. Ross, J. Siderov, P. Thomas, S. White, S. Kirsa, D. Rischin
    Internal Medicine Journal.2017; 47(1): 16.     CrossRef
  • Association Between Time (Initiation and Length) and Oncological Outcomes for the Patients with Colon Cancer Treated with Adjuvant Chemotherapy
    In Seob Jeong, Jong Han Yoo, Sang Hyuk Seo, Min Sung An, Kwang Hee Kim, Ki Beom Bae, Chang Soo Choi, Jin Won Hwang, Ji Hyun Kim, Mi Seon Kang, Min Kyung Oh, Kwan Hee Hong
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2015; 77(S3): 1252.     CrossRef
  • Timing of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Moo-Jun Baek
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(4): 138.     CrossRef
Expression of Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine in the Stroma of a Colorectal Carcinoma is Associated With Patient Prognosis
Jeong Yeon Kim, Dongjun Jeong, Tae Sung Ahn, Hyung Ju Kim, Doo San Park, So Yong Park, Sang Byung Bae, Sookyoung Lee, Sung Soo Lee, Moon Soo Lee, Hyun Deuk Cho, Moo Jun Baek
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(3):93-99.   Published online June 30, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.3.93
  • 7,414 View
  • 30 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 11 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC), also known as osteonectin or basement-membrane-40 (BM-40), is a member of a family of matricellular proteins, whose functions are to modulate cell-matrix interactions, growth and angiogenesis in colorectal cancer. In this study, the expression of SPARC was evaluated and its correlations with clinicopathological parameters were investigated.

Methods

The researchers analyzed the expression patterns of SPARC by using immunohistochemistry in 332 cases of colorectal cancer of tissue microarray. The clinicopathological characteristics were defined by using the TNM criteria of the Union for International Cancer Control. Clinicopathological factors such as age, sex, histologic type of the tumor, pathologic tumor stage, TNM stage, and lymphovascular invasion were evaluated according to the SPARC expression.

Results

The hazard ratios expressing SPARC in tumor cells, in the stroma, and in both tumor cells and the stroma were 2.10 (P = 0.036), 3.27 (P = 0.003) and 2.12 (P = 0.038), respectively. Patient survival was decreased in patient expressing SPARC in the stroma, and this result showed statistical significance (P = 0.016).

Conclusion

These findings suggest that SPARC expression in a tumor and in the stroma correlates with disease progression and may be used as a prognostic marker for colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • SPARC Induces COL1A1/COL3A1 Expressions Representing Aggressive Molecular Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts Signatures and CSF1-Mediated Cancer Invasion in Colorectal Cancer
    Yusuke Nie, Yoshiki Fujiyama, Shumpei Shibaki, Riku Okamoto, Kota Okuno, Keiko Oki, Akiko Watanabe, Yu Kuroda, Takuya Goto, Kazuko Yokota, Keita Kojima, Hiroki Harada, Mikiko Kidachi, Takafumi Soeno, Mitsuo Yokota, Takeshi Kaida, Shuji Nakamoto, Nobuyuki
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2025; 32(12): 9354.     CrossRef
  • CAFs-Associated Genes (CAFGs) in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and Novel Therapeutic Strategy
    Keishi Yamashita, Yusuke Kumamoto
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(11): 6003.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of SPARC in hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xiaoyu Yang, Yunhong Xia, Shuomin Wang, Chen Sun, Raj Kumar Koiri
    PLOS ONE.2022; 17(8): e0273317.     CrossRef
  • SPARC in hematologic malignancies and novel technique for hematological disease with its abnormal expression
    Qing Nian, Jingwei Li, ZhongYu Han, Qi Liang, Maoyu Liu, Chan Yang, Fernando Rodrigues-Lima, Tao Jiang, Liyun Zhao, Jinhao Zeng, Chi Liu, Jianyou Shi
    Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2022; 153: 113519.     CrossRef
  • Role of SPARC in the epithelial-mesenchymal transition induced by PTHrP in human colon cancer cells
    Pedro Carriere, Natalia Calvo, María Belén Novoa Díaz, Fernanda Lopez-Moncada, Alexander Herrera, María José Torres, Exequiel Alonso, Norberto Ariel Gandini, Graciela Gigola, Hector R. Contreras, Claudia Gentili
    Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology.2021; 530: 111253.     CrossRef
  • Phenotypic plasticity underlies local invasion and distant metastasis in colon cancer
    Andrea Sacchetti, Miriam Teeuwssen, Mathijs Verhagen, Rosalie Joosten, Tong Xu, Roberto Stabile, Berdine van der Steen, Martin M Watson, Alem Gusinac, Won Kyu Kim, Inge Ubink, Harmen JG Van de Werken, Arianna Fumagalli, Madelon Paauwe, Jacco Van Rheenen,
    eLife.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine gene variants: Impact on susceptibility and survival of hepatocellular carcinoma patients
    Samar Kamal Darweesh, Rasha Ahmed Abd Alziz, Heba Omar, Dina Sabry, Wael Fathy
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2019; 34(8): 1424.     CrossRef
  • Self‐Targeting, Immune Transparent Plasma Protein Coated Nanocomplex for Noninvasive Photothermal Anticancer Therapy
    Fwu‐Long Mi, Thierry Burnouf, Shih‐Yuan Lu, Yu‐Jen Lu, Kun‐Ying Lu, Yi‐Cheng Ho, Chang‐Yi Kuo, Er‐Yuan Chuang
    Advanced Healthcare Materials.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • SPARC: As a prognostic biomarker in rectal cancer patients treated with chemo-radiotherapy
    Neslihan Kurtul, Erdem Arzu Taşdemir, Dilek Ünal, Mustafa İzmirli, Celalettin Eroglu
    Cancer Biomarkers.2017; 18(4): 459.     CrossRef
  • Tumor–stroma ratio is an independent predictor for survival in early cervical carcinoma
    Jing Liu, Juan Liu, Jinsong Li, Yingling Chen, Xiaoling Guan, Xiaojuan Wu, Chunyan Hao, Yanlin Sun, Yan Wang, Xiao Wang
    Gynecologic Oncology.2014; 132(1): 81.     CrossRef
  • Significance of Secreted Protein Acidic and Rich in Cysteine Expression in Colorectal Carcinoma
    Young Jin Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(3): 87.     CrossRef
Individualized Cutoff Value of the Preoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level is Necessary for Optimal Use as a Prognostic Marker
Byeong Geon Jeon, Rumi Shin, Jung Kee Chung, In Mok Jung, Seung Chul Heo
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(3):106-114.   Published online June 30, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.3.106
  • 7,263 View
  • 45 Download
  • 19 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is an important prognostic marker in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, in some stages, it does not work. We performed this study to find a way in which preoperative CEA could be used as a constant prognostic marker in harmony with the TNM staging system.

Methods

Preoperative CEA levels and recurrences in CRC were surveyed. The distribution of CEA levels and the recurrences in each TNM stage of CRC were analyzed. An optimal cutoff value for each TNM stage was calculated and tested for validity as a prognostic marker within the TNM staging system.

Results

The conventional cutoff value of CEA (5 ng/mL) was an independent prognostic factor on the whole. However, when evaluated in subgroups, it was not a prognostic factor in stage I or stage III of N2. A subgroup analysis according to TNM stage revealed different CEA distributions and recurrence rates corresponding to different CEA ranges. The mean CEA levels were higher in advanced stages. In addition, the recurrence rates of corresponding CEA ranges were higher in advanced stages. Optimal cutoff values from the receiver operating characteristic curves were 7.4, 5.5, and 4.5 ng/mL for TNM stage I, II, and III, respectively. Those for N0, N1, and N2 stages were 5.5, 4.8, and 3.5 ng/mL, respectively. The 5-year disease-free survivals were significantly different according to these cutoff values for each TNM and N stage. The multivariate analysis confirmed the new cutoff values to be more efficient in discriminating the prognosis in the subgroups of the TNM stages.

Conclusion

Individualized cutoff values of the preoperative CEA level are a more practical prognostic marker following and in harmony with the TNM staging system.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Grading carcinoembryonic antigen levels can enhance the effectiveness of prognostic stratification in patients with colorectal cancer: a single-centre retrospective study
    Hailun Xie, Lishuang Wei, Qiwen Wang, Shuangyi Tang, Jialiang Gan
    BMJ Open.2024; 14(10): e084219.     CrossRef
  • Cell-free circulating ALU repeats in serum have a prognostic value for colorectal cancer patients
    Isabel Anzinger, Dorothea Nagel, Enrico N. De Toni, Andrea Ofner, Alexander B. Philipp, Lesca M. Holdt, Daniel Teupser, Frank T. Kolligs, Andreas Herbst
    Cancer Biomarkers.2023; 37(4): 237.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen and D-dimer concentrations in patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer
    Yasutomo Ojima, Masao Harano, Daisuke Sumitani, Masanori Yoshimitsu, Masazumi Okajima
    Surgery Today.2021; 51(7): 1108.     CrossRef
  • Incidence of and Risk Factors for Gastroepiploic Lymph Node Involvement in Patients with Cancer of the Transverse Colon Including the Hepatic Flexure
    Xiaojie Wang, Shenghui Huang, Xingrong Lu, Ying Huang, Pan Chi
    World Journal of Surgery.2021; 45(5): 1514.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic accuracy of follow‐up tests for detecting colorectal cancer recurrences in primary care: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Geertje B. Liemburg, Daan Brandenbarg, Marjolein Y. Berger, Saskia F.A. Duijts, Gea A. Holtman, Geertruida H. Bock, Joke C. Korevaar, Annette J. Berendsen
    European Journal of Cancer Care.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Serum carcinoembryonic antigen pre‐operative level in colorectal cancer: revisiting risk stratification
    Cristiana Iacuzzo, Paola Germani, Marina Troian, Tommaso Cipolat Mis, Fabiola Giudici, Edoardo Osenda, Marina Bortul, Nicolò de Manzini
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The role of preoperative CEA in the management of colorectal cancer: A cohort study from two cancer centres
    Ali Riaz Baqar, Simon Wilkins, Margaret Staples, Chun Hin Angus Lee, Karen Oliva, Paul McMurrick
    International Journal of Surgery.2019; 64: 10.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Four Automated Carcinoembryonic Antigen Immunoassays: ADVIA Centaur XP, ARCHITECT I2000sr, Elecsys E170, and Unicel Dxi800
    Joonhong Park, Seungok Lee, Yeongsic Kim, Aeran Choi, Hyeyoung Lee, Jihyang Lim, Yonggoo Kim, Kyungja Han, Eun-jee Oh
    Annals of Laboratory Medicine.2018; 38(4): 355.     CrossRef
  • Potential of quantitative SEPT9 and SHOX2 methylation in plasmatic circulating cell-free DNA as auxiliary staging parameter in colorectal cancer: a prospective observational cohort study
    Julia Bergheim, Alexander Semaan, Heidrun Gevensleben, Susanne Groening, Andreas Knoblich, Jörn Dietrich, Julia Weber, Jörg C. Kalff, Friedrich Bootz, Glen Kristiansen, Dimo Dietrich
    British Journal of Cancer.2018; 118(9): 1217.     CrossRef
  • Pre‐operative carcinoembryonic antigen predicts survival following colorectal cancer surgery with curative intent
    Ashok Gunawardene, Peter Larsen, Ali Shekouh, Elizabeth Dennett
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2018; 88(12): 1311.     CrossRef
  • Accessing new prognostic significance of preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer receiving tumor resection: More than positive and negative
    Zerong Cai, Jian Xiao, Xiaosheng He, Jia Ke, Yifeng Zou, Yufeng Chen, Xianrui Wu, Xiaoling Li, Lei Wang, Jianping Wang, Ping Lan, Xiaojian Wu
    Cancer Biomarkers.2017; 19(2): 161.     CrossRef
  • A nanobody targeting carcinoembryonic antigen as a promising molecular probe for non-small cell lung cancer
    Hao Wang, Ai-Min Meng, Sheng-Hua Li, Xiao-Liang Zhou
    Molecular Medicine Reports.2017; 16(1): 625.     CrossRef
  • Valor pronóstico pretratamiento del antígeno carcinoembrionario en el cáncer colorrectal operado. ¿Es útil en todos los estadios del tumor?
    Ana Borda, Carlos Prieto, Javier Jiménez, Juan Vila, José Manuel Zozaya, Fernando Borda
    Gastroenterología y Hepatología.2016; 39(3): 191.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of preoperative carcinoembryogenic antigen: Is it useful in all stages of colorectal cancer?
    Ana Borda, Carlos Prieto, Javier Jiménez, Juan Vila, José Manuel Zozaya, Fernando Borda
    Gastroenterología y Hepatología (English Edition).2016; 39(3): 191.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of colorectal cancer glyco‐secretome identifies laminin β‐1 (LAMB1) as a potential serological biomarker for colorectal cancer
    Qifeng Lin, Hannah S.R. Lim, Hui Ling Lin, Hwee Tong Tan, Teck Kwang Lim, Wai Kit Cheong, Peh Yean Cheah, Choong Leong Tang, Pierce K. H. Chow, Maxey C. M. Chung
    PROTEOMICS.2015; 15(22): 3905.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer. An Independent Prognostic Factor Still Reliable
    Giovanni Li Destri, Antonio Salvatore Rubino, Rosalia Latino, Fabio Giannone, Raffaele Lanteri, Beniamino Scilletta, Antonio Di Cataldo
    International Surgery.2015; 100(4): 617.     CrossRef
  • Carcinoembryonic antigen levels in colorectal cancer: Are we too preoccupied?
    G Aggarwal, MK Roy, S Banerjee
    Indian Journal of Cancer.2014; 51(4): 452.     CrossRef
  • Lectin approaches for glycoproteomics in FDA-approved cancer biomarkers
    Haitham A Badr, Dina MM AlSadek, Ashraf A Darwish, Abdelaleim I ElSayed, Bakhytzhan O Bekmanov, Elmira M Khussainova, Xueji Zhang, William CS Cho, Leyla B Djansugurova, Chen-Zhong Li
    Expert Review of Proteomics.2014; 11(2): 227.     CrossRef
  • Individualized Cutoff Value of the Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Level According to TNM Stage in Colorectal Cancer
    Byung-Kwon Ahn
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(3): 91.     CrossRef
Prognostic Impact of the Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio on Survival in Rectal Cancer
Wafi Attaallah, Omer Gunal, Manuk Manukyan, Gulden Ozden, Cumhur Yegen
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(3):100-105.   Published online June 30, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.3.100
  • 6,458 View
  • 39 Download
  • 15 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Lymph-node metastasis is the most important predictor of survival in stage III rectal cancer. The number of metastatic lymph nodes may vary depending on the level of specimen dissection and the total number of lymph nodes harvested. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the lymph node ratio (LNR) is a prognostic parameter for patients with rectal cancer.

Methods

A retrospective review of a database of rectal cancer patients was performed to determine the effect of the LNR on the disease-free survival (DFS) and the overall survival. Of the total 228 patients with rectal cancer, 55 patients with stage III cancer were eligible for analysis. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analyses, after adjustments for potential confounders, were used to evaluate the relationship between the LNR and survival.

Results

According to the cutoff point 0.15 (15%), the 2-year DFS was 95.2% among patients with a LNR < 0.15 compared with 67.6% for those with LNR ≥ 0.15 (P = 0.02). In stratified and multivariate analyses adjusted for age, gender, histology and tumor status, a higher LNR was independently associated with worse DFS.

Conclusion

This study showed the prognostic significance of ratio-based staging for rectal cancer and may help in developing better staging systems. LNR 0.15 (15%) was shown to be a cutoff point for determining survival and prognosis in rectal cancer cases.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Impact of Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio on Survival and Prognosis in Rectal Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study
    Bahadır Kartal, Mehmet Berksun Tutan
    Cureus.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Progress in the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in rectal cancer: a review
    Wei Peng, Huimin Qiao, Linfeng Mo, You Guo
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Role of Nonmetastatic Lymph Nodes in the Survival of Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review
    Alexander J. Pennings, Brecht A. van der Velden, Maximilian Kloft, Loes F. S. Kooreman, Jos M. P. Kleijnen, Stephanie O. Breukink, Geerard L. Beets, Heike I. Grabsch, Jarno Melenhorst
    Annals of Surgery Open.2023; 4(4): e336.     CrossRef
  • Value of intravoxel incoherent motion for assessment of lymph node status and tumor response after chemoradiation therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Hang Li, Yi Yuan, Xiao-li Chen, Guang-wen Chen, Hao Liu, Yi-Sha Liu, Ming-hui Pang, Si-yun Liu, Hong Pu, Zhen-lin Li
    European Journal of Radiology.2022; 146: 110106.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Factors of Recurrence and Survival in Operated Patients with Colorectal Cancer
    Alimohammad Bananzadeh, Ali Daneshvar Jahromi, Amirhossein Emami Meybodi, Seyed Mohammad Kazem Tadayon, Mohammad Rezazadehkermani
    Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases.2022; 14(1): 44.     CrossRef
  • Radiomics Based on T2-Weighted Imaging and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Images for Preoperative Evaluation of Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer Patients
    Chunli Li, Jiandong Yin
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Modified Gastric Cancer AJCC Staging with a Classification Based on the Ratio of Regional Lymph Node Involvement: A Population-Based Cohort Study
    Zeping Huang, Yutong Chen, Wenjun Zhang, Haipeng Liu, Zixian Wang, Youcheng Zhang
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2020; 27(5): 1480.     CrossRef
  • Oncologic Outcomes of Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Stage II and III Upper Rectal Cancer
    Ji Eun Yoon, Soo Young Lee, Han Duk Kwak, Seung Seop Yeom, Chang Hyun Kim, Jae Kyun Joo, Hyeong Rok Kim, Young Jin Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2019; 35(3): 137.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Implications of Lymph Node Metastasis in Colorectal Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives
    Hye Jin Kim, Gyu–Seog Choi
    Annals of Coloproctology.2019; 35(3): 109.     CrossRef
  • Proposal of a modified American Joint Committee on Cancer staging scheme for resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with a lymph node ratio-based N classification
    Huan-Jun Li, Yu-Tong Chen, Shu-Qiang Yuan
    Medicine.2018; 97(34): e12094.     CrossRef
  • A systematic review of the prognostic value of lymph node ratio, number of positive nodes and total nodes examined in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
    M Elshaer, G Gravante, M Kosmin, A Riaz, A Al-Bahrani
    The Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England.2017; 99(2): 101.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative SCC Antigen, CRP Serum Levels, and Lymph Node Density in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Mohamad Adel, Chung-Kan Tsao, Fu-Chan Wei, Huei-Tzu Chien, Chih-Hsiung Lai, Chun-Ta Liao, Hung-Ming Wang, Kang-Hsing Fan, Chung-Jan Kang, Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang, Shiang-Fu Huang
    Medicine.2016; 95(14): e3149.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Impact of the Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio on Survival in Gastric Cancer
    Wafi Attaallah, Kivilcim Uprak, Omer Gunal, Cumhur Yegen
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology.2016; 7(1): 67.     CrossRef
  • Lymph node density in oral cavity cancer: results of the International Consortium for Outcomes Research
    S G Patel, M Amit, T C Yen, C T Liao, P Chaturvedi, J P Agarwal, L P Kowalski, A Ebrahimi, J R Clark, C R Cernea, S J Brandao, M Kreppel, J Zöller, D Fliss, E Fridman, G Bachar, T Shpitzer, V A Bolzoni, P R Patel, S Jonnalagadda, K T Robbins, J P Shah, Z
    British Journal of Cancer.2013; 109(8): 2087.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Significance of the Metastatic Lymph-Node Ratio in Rectal Cancer
    Hyoung Chul Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(3): 89.     CrossRef
Oncologic Outcomes of Stage IIIA Colon Cancer for Different Chemotherapeutic Regimens
Yoo Sung Lee, Hee Cheol Kim, Kyung Ook Jung, Yong Beom Cho, Seong Hyeon Yun, Woo Yong Lee, Ho-Kyung Chun
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(5):259-264.   Published online October 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.259
  • 5,372 View
  • 13 Download
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Adjuvant chemotherapy is currently recommended for Stage IIIA colon cancers. This study aimed to elucidate the oncologic outcomes of Stage IIIA colon cancer according to the chemotherapeutic regimen based on a retrospective review.

Methods

From 1995 to 2008, Stage IIIA colon cancer patients were identified from a prospectively maintained database at a single institution. Exclusion criteria were as follows: rectal cancer, another malignancy other than colon cancer, no adjuvant chemotherapy and unknown chemotherapeutic regimen. One hundred thirty-one patients were enrolled in the study, and the clinicopathologic and the oncologic characteristics were analyzed. The number of males was 72, and the number of females was 59; the mean age was 59.5 years (range, 25 to 76 years), and the median follow-up period was 33 months (range, 2 to 127 months).

Results

Of the 131 patients, fluorouracil/leucovorin (FL)/capecitabine chemotherapy was performed in 109 patients, and FOLFOX chemotherapy was performed in 22 patients. When the patients who received FL/capecitabine chemotherapy and the patients who received FOLFOX chemotherapy were compared, there was no significant difference in the clinicopathologic factors between the two groups. The 5-year overall survival and the 5-year disease-free survival were 97.2% and 94.5% in the FL/capecitabine patient group and 95.5% and 90.9% in the FOLFOX patient group, respectively, and no statistically significant differences were noted between the two groups.

Conclusion

Stage IIIA colon cancer showed good oncologic outcomes, and the chemotherapeutic regimen did not seem to affect the oncologic outcome.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A New Method for Constructing Macrophage-Associated Predictors of Treatment Efficacy Based on Single-Cell Sequencing Analysis
    Jianxiu Lin, Yang Ran, Tengfei Wu, Zishan Wang, Jinjin Zhao, Yun Tian
    Journal of Immunotherapy.2024; 47(2): 33.     CrossRef
  • Distinctive oncological features of stage IIIA colorectal cancer: Analysis of prognostic factors for selective adjuvant chemotherapy
    Soo Yeun Park, Gyu‐Seog Choi, Jun Seok Park, Hye Jin Kim, Yoshiharu Sakai, Suguru Hasegawa, Toshiaki Watanabe, Seon Hahn Kim
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2015; 111(7): 882.     CrossRef
Prognostic Implication of 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin Dehydrogenase Down-Regulation in Patients with Colorectal Cancer
Pil Sung Kang, Jin Ha Kim, Ok In Moon, Sung Chul Lim, Kyung Jong Kim
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(5):253-258.   Published online October 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.5.253
  • 4,745 View
  • 50 Download
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Prostaglandin (PG) E2 is known to be closely related to cancer progression and is inactivated by 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (PGDH). 15-PGDH is shown to have tumor suppressor activity and to be down-regulated in various cancers, including colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, we evaluated the expression of 15-PGDH and its prognostic effect in patients with CRC.

Methods

15-PGDH expression was examined by using immunohistochemistry in 77 patients with CRC. Its prognostic significance was statistically evaluated.

Results

Negative 15-PGDH expression was noted in 55.8% of the 77 cases of CRC. 15-PGDH expression showed no correlation with any of the various clinicopathologic parameters. The status of lymph node metastasis, tumor-node-metastasis stages, and pre-operative carcinoembryonic antigen levels showed significant prognostic effect. However, univariate analysis revealed down-regulation of 15-PGDH not to be a predictor of poor survival. The 5-year overall survival rate was 71.7% in the group with positive expression of 15-PGDH and 67.1% in the group with negative expression of 15-PGDH, but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.751).

Conclusion

15-PGDH was down-regulated in 55.8% of the colorectal cancer patients. However, down-regulation of 15-PGDH showed no prognostic value in patients with CRC. Further larger scale or prospective studies are needed to clarify the prognostic effect of 15-PGDH down-regulation in patients with colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The tumor suppressor role and epigenetic regulation of 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) in cancer and tumor microenvironment (TME)
    SubbaRao V. Tulimilli, Medha Karnik, Anjali Devi S. Bettadapura, Olga A. Sukocheva, Edmund Tse, Gowthamarajan Kuppusamy, Suma M. Natraj, SubbaRao V. Madhunapantula
    Pharmacology & Therapeutics.2025; 268: 108826.     CrossRef
  • Molecular Targets in Precision Chemoprevention of Colorectal Cancer: An Update from Pre-Clinical to Clinical Trials
    Nagendra S. Yarla, Venkateshwar Madka, Gopal Pathuri, Chinthalapally V. Rao
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2020; 21(24): 9609.     CrossRef
Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy with 5-FU/Leucovorin and Prognosis in Stage II Colon Cancer
Sun Hee Jee, Sun Mi Moon, Ui Sup Shin, Hoe Min Yang, Dae-Yong Hwang
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(6):322-328.   Published online December 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.6.322
  • 6,862 View
  • 37 Download
  • 18 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The aims of this study were to investigate the survival results and the prognostic factors of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer in the sparsity of Korean data.

Methods

From 1993 to 2006, 363 curatively resected pathologic stage II colon cancer patients were enrolled. Six cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy was performed: intravenous bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 500 mg/m2 with leucovorin 20 mg/m2 for 2 hours daily for 5 days, followed by a 3-week resting period (n = 308). Fifty-five patients received only curative surgery. A high risk of recurrence was defined as the presence of one or more of the following factors: T4 tumor, lympho-vascular invasion, perineural invasion, perforation, obstruction, retrieved lymph node < 12, and poorly differention. The median follow-up period was 68 months (1 to 205 months).

Results

The five-year overall survival (OS) rate was 90.1%, and the five-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 84.7%. Among high-risk patients, the OS and the DFS rates of the treatment group were significantly higher than those of the non-treatment group (OS: 90.6% vs. 69.1%, P < 0.0001; DFS: 85.9% vs. 54.1%, P < 0.0001). Among low-risk patients, the survival results of the treatment group were also significantly superior (OS: 97.7% vs. 88.2%, P < 0.0001; DFS: 93.0% vs. 80.0%, P = 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy was a significantly favorable prognostic factor for overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.41; 95% confidence interval, 0.22 to 0.75; P = 0.004).

Conclusion

In our population, adjuvant chemotherapy showed superior survival to curative surgery alone and significantly reduced the risk of death. A nationwide multicenter randomized trial is needed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Novel Drug Combinations in Lung Cancer: New Potential Synergies Between 5-FU and Repurposed Drugs
    Eduarda Ribeiro, Nuno Vale
    Applied Sciences.2024; 14(21): 9658.     CrossRef
  • Ulva pertusa Modulated Colonic Oxidative Stress Markers and Clinical Parameters: A Potential Adjuvant Therapy to Manage Side Effects During 5-FU Regimen
    Alberto Repici, Anna Paola Capra, Ahmed Hasan, Rossella Basilotta, Sarah Adriana Scuderi, Michela Campolo, Irene Paterniti, Emanuela Esposito, Alessio Ardizzone
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(23): 12988.     CrossRef
  • Using zebrafish to assess the effect of chronic, early developmental exposure to environmentally relevant concentrations of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin
    M. Ng, K. DeCicco-Skinner, V.P. Connaughton
    Environmental Toxicology and Pharmacology.2020; 76: 103356.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative chemotherapy improves survival in patients with resected high‐risk Stage II colorectal cancer: results of a systematic review and meta‐analysis
    C. Simillis, H. K. S. I. Singh, T. Afxentiou, S. Mills, O. J. Warren, J. J. Smith, P. Riddle, M. Adamina, D. Cunningham, P. P. Tekkis
    Colorectal Disease.2020; 22(10): 1231.     CrossRef
  • Patient Selection for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Risk Stage II Colon Cancer
    Chao Zhang, Songcheng Yin, Yuen Tan, Jinyu Huang, Pengliang Wang, Wenbin Hou, Zhe Zhang, Huimian Xu
    American Journal of Clinical Oncology.2020; 43(4): 279.     CrossRef
  • Scoulerine promotes cell viability reduction and apoptosis by activating ROS-dependent endoplasmic reticulum stress in colorectal cancer cells
    Jiaxun Tian, Jiamei Mo, Lan Xu, Rui Zhang, Yun Qiao, Bin Liu, Lei Jiang, Siyang Ma, Gang Shi
    Chemico-Biological Interactions.2020; 327: 109184.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with Stage II colorectal cancer: A multicenter retrospective study
    Hasan Jalaeikhoo, Mohammad Zokaasadi, Ahmad Khajeh-Mehrizi, Mohsen Rajaeinejad, Seied Asadollah Mousavi, Mohammad Vaezi, Hosein Kmranzadeh Fumani, Manoutchehr Keyhani, Kamran Alimoghaddam, Ardeshir Ghavamzadeh
    Journal of Research in Medical Sciences.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Colorectal obstruction is a potential prognostic factor for stage II colorectal cancer
    Yusuke Okuda, Takaya Shimura, Tomonori Yamada, Yoshikazu Hirata, Ryuzo Yamaguchi, Eiji Sakamoto, Hiromi Kataoka
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2018; 23(6): 1101.     CrossRef
  • Effect of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Stage II Colon Cancer: Analysis of Korean National Data
    Min Ki Kim, Daeyoun David Won, Sun Min Park, Taejung Kim, Sung Ryong Kim, Seong Taek Oh, Seung Kook Sohn, Mi Yeon Kang, In Kyu Lee
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2018; 50(4): 1149.     CrossRef
  • Perineural Invasion Is a Strong Prognostic Factor in Colorectal Cancer
    Nikki Knijn, Stephanie C. Mogk, Steven Teerenstra, Femke Simmer, Iris D. Nagtegaal
    American Journal of Surgical Pathology.2016; 40(1): 103.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Value of Perineural Invasion in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Yuchong Yang, Xuanzhang Huang, Jingxu Sun, Peng Gao, Yongxi Song, Xiaowan Chen, Junhua Zhao, Zhenning Wang
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2015; 19(6): 1113.     CrossRef
  • Colchicine induces apoptosis in HT-29 human colon cancer cells via the AKT and c-Jun N-terminal kinase signaling pathways
    ZHEN HUANG, YE XU, WEI PENG
    Molecular Medicine Reports.2015; 12(4): 5939.     CrossRef
  • Is Microsatellite Instability Really a Good Prognostic Factor of Colorectal Cancer?
    Ui Sup Shin, Sang Sik Cho, Sun Mi Moon, Sun Hoo Park, Sun Hee Jee, Eun-Joo Jung, Dae-Yong Hwang
    Annals of Coloproctology.2014; 30(1): 28.     CrossRef
  • The Sirtuin 3 Expression Profile Is Associated with Pathological and Clinical Outcomes in Colon Cancer Patients
    Chunyuan Liu, Zonghai Huang, Hong Jiang, Fujun Shi
    BioMed Research International.2014; 2014: 1.     CrossRef
  • Do High-risk Features Support the Use of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage II Colon Cancer? A Turkish Oncology Group Study
    Mehmet Artac, Nazim Serdar Turhal, Murat Kocer, Bulent Karabulut, Hakan Bozcuk, Suayip Yalcin, Mustafa Karaagac, Seyda Gündüz, Nalan Isik, Kazim Uygun
    Tumori Journal.2014; 100(2): 143.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Colectomy Decreases the Time to Administration of Chemotherapy Compared with Open Colectomy
    Vitaliy Poylin, Thomas Curran, Eliza Lee, Deborah Nagle
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2014; 21(11): 3587.     CrossRef
  • Identification of the Risk Factors for Recurrence of Stage II Rectal Cancer
    Sho Sawazaki, Manabu Shiozawa, Teni Godai, Yusuke Katayama, Koji Numata, Akio Higuchi, Yasushi Rino, Munetaka Masuda, Makoto Akaike
    Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2014; 67(5): 305.     CrossRef
  • Current Controversies in the Management of Colon Cancer
    Supriya S. Patel, Adrienne Floyd, Michael G. Doorly, Adrian E. Ortega, Glenn T. Ault, Andreas M. Kaiser, Anthony J. Senagore
    Current Problems in Surgery.2012; 49(7): 398.     CrossRef
Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Stage III Rectal Cancer
Jin Yong Shin, Kwan Hee Hong
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(5):252-259.   Published online October 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.5.252
  • 4,580 View
  • 29 Download
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Although nodal metastasis is the most powerful prognostic factor in rectal cancer, marked heterogeneity exists within stage III rectal cancer. Recent studies of rectal cancer have shown a prognostic superiority of the lymph node ratio (LNR) compared with N stage. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the LNR in the era of the 7th edition of the TNM classification.

Methods

We included 190 patients who underwent a curative resection for rectal cancer with nodal metastasis. The patients were divided into four groups on the basis of statistically calculated cut-off values as 0.21, 0.32, and 0.61.

Results

The LNR was an independent risk factor for overall survival (OS; P = 0.008) and for systemic recurrence-free survival (SRFS; P = 0.002). However, the LNR was not a predictive factor for local recurrence. When the N stage of the sixth TNM staging system was separately analyzed as a covariate, the LNR was also found to be a predictive factor for both OS and SRFS (P = 0.012 and P = 0.004, respectively). A LNR value of 0.21 offered the best cut off to separate patients into two prognostic groups.

Conclusion

The defined cut-off values of the LNR were an independent risk factor for OS and distant metastasis-free survival in patients with rectal cancer, irrespective of the sixth or the seventh version of the TNM classification, and the LNR should be considered as a prognostic variable in any future staging system.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic value of lymph node ratio in non-small-cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis
    Jian Zhou, Zhangyu Lin, Mengyuan Lyu, Nan Chen, Hu Liao, Zihuai Wang, Jianqi Hao, Chunyi Yan, Lunxu Liu
    Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology.2020; 50(1): 44.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of two novel staging systems with the TNM system in predicting stage III colon cancer survival
    Richard Walker, Trevor Wood, Emily LeSouder, Michelle Cleghorn, Manjula Maganti, Andrea MacNeill, Fayez A. Quereshy
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018; 117(5): 1049.     CrossRef
  • The Prognostic Impact of the Metastatic Lymph Nodes Ratio in Colorectal Cancer
    Chi-Hao Zhang, Yan-Yan Li, Qing-Wei Zhang, Alberto Biondi, Valeria Fico, Roberto Persiani, Xiao-Chun Ni, Meng Luo
    Frontiers in Oncology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Log odds of positive lymph nodes is a superior prognostic indicator in stage III rectal cancer patients: A retrospective analysis of 17,632 patients in the SEER database
    Ben Huang, Chen Chen, Mengdong Ni, Shaobo Mo, Guoxiang Cai, Sanjun Cai
    International Journal of Surgery.2016; 32: 24.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Significance of the Metastatic Lymph-Node Ratio in Rectal Cancer
    Hyoung Chul Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(3): 89.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Impact of the Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio on Survival in Rectal Cancer
    Wafi Attaallah, Omer Gunal, Manuk Manukyan, Gulden Ozden, Cumhur Yegen
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(3): 100.     CrossRef
  • O índice de linfonodos comprometidos como um preditor para a ocorrência de recidivas tumorais no câncer de cólon estádio III
    Tiago L. Dedavid e Silva, Daniel C. Damin
    Revista do Colégio Brasileiro de Cirurgiões.2013; 40(6): 463.     CrossRef
Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 and -7 Expression in Colorectal Cancer
Seong Woo Hong, Yun Kyung Kang, Byungmo Lee, Woo Yong Lee, Yeo Gu Jang, In Wook Paik, Hyucksang Lee
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(3):133-139.   Published online June 30, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.3.133
  • 6,170 View
  • 35 Download
  • 20 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) and MMP-7 have been implicated in tumor growth and metastasis. This study aimed to investigate the expressions of MMP-2 and -7 in colorectal cancer and to evaluate their values as prognostic markers.

Methods

Immunohistochemical staining for MMP-2 and -7 was done in 144 resected colorectal cancer specimens. Clinicopathological data and survival results were compared with regard to the expression results.

Results

The expression rates of MMP-2 in tumor cells in the tumor center and the tumor border were 16.7% and 38.9%, respectively. That of MMP-2 in stromal cells was 27.8%. MMP-7 immunoreactivities of tumor cells in the tumor center and the tumor border were 6.9% and 23.6%. The expressions of MMP-2 and MMP-7 were correlated. MMP-2 expression in stromal cells was more increased in the distal part of the colorectum: 8.8% in right colon cancer, 29.5% in left colon cancer and 36.4% in rectal cancer. MMP-2 expression of tumor cells in the tumor border was correlated with T-stage. MMP-7 expression of tumor cells in the tumor border was increased in case of infiltrative cancer compared with fungating tumor. The expression patterns of MMP-2 and -7 were not correlated with other clinicopathological factors, including tumor markers, node metastasis, distant metastasis, lymphatic invasion, tumor differentiation, and recurrence. No significant associations between the overall and disease-free survival rates and the MMP-2 and -7 expression patterns were noted.

Conclusion

The high expression rates of MMP-2 and -7 in tumor borders suggest that MMP-2 and -7 have some role in tumor invasion, but in this study, MMP-2 and -7 did not appear to be significant predictors of prognosis in colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A review of matrix metalloproteinase-2-sensitive nanoparticles as a novel drug delivery for tumor therapy
    Lanlan Zong, Hongliang Xu, Huiqi Zhang, Ziwei Tu, Xiao Zhang, Shumin Wang, Meigui Li, Yu Feng, Binke Wang, Luhui Li, Xinmei Xie, Zhonggui He, Xiaohui Pu
    International Journal of Biological Macromolecules.2024; 262: 130043.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of integrin αV expression and localization pattern in invasive breast carcinomas
    Otto Luiz Dutra Cerqueira, Mayara Carolline Silva Botelho, Ana Paula Zen Petisco Fiore, Cynthia Aparecida Bueno de Toledo Osório, Rebeka Tomasin, Mauro César Cafundó Morais, Rossana Verónica Mendoza López, Elaine Cristina Cardoso, Santiago Andres Vilella-
    Neoplasia.2022; 30: 100803.     CrossRef
  • Effect of ginger extracts on colorectal cancer HCT-116 cell line in the expression of MMP-2 and KRAS
    Shiva Malmir, Asa Ebrahimi, Frouzandeh Mahjoubi
    Gene Reports.2020; 21: 100824.     CrossRef
  • Proteome Heterogeneity in Colorectal Cancer
    Lay Cheng Lim, Yang Mooi Lim
    PROTEOMICS.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Implications of Isoprostanes and Matrix Metalloproteinase-7 Having Potential Role in the Development of Colorectal Cancer in Males
    Mahmood Rasool, Arif Malik, Ahmad Ashar Ghuman, Muhammad Abdul Basit Ashraf, Mahwish Arooj, Sulayman Waquar, Sara Zahid, Sumera Shaheen, Aamer Qazi, Muhammad Imran Naseer, Mazin A. Zamzami, Ayat Al-Ghafari, Othman A. Baothman, Mustafa Zeyadi, Nawal Helmi,
    Frontiers in Oncology.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Circulating gelatinases are not prognostic of treatment response and survival in locally advanced rectal cancer patients undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy
    Sukran Ulger, Diclehan Kilic, Fatih Demircioglu, Canan Y Demirtas, Ozge T. Pasaoglu
    Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.2018; 14(Suppl 1): S90.     CrossRef
  • Profile of Expression of Genes Encoding Matrix Metallopeptidase 9 (MMP9), Matrix Metallopeptidase 28 (MMP28) and TIMP Metallopeptidase Inhibitor 1 (TIMP1) in Colorectal Cancer: Assessment of the Role in Diagnosis and Prognostication
    Zbigniew Lorenc, Dariusz Waniczek, Katarzyna Lorenc-Podgórska, Wiktor Krawczyk, Maciej Domagała, Mateusz Majewski, Urszula Mazurek
    Medical Science Monitor.2017; 23: 1305.     CrossRef
  • Matrix Metalloproteinase-2 and -9, Lactate, and Malate Dehydrogenase and Lipid Peroxides in Sera of Patients with Colorectal Carcinoma
    Kristina Gopcevic, B. Rovcanin, D. Kekic, Z. Krivokapic, V. Dragutinovic
    Folia Biologica.2017; 63(5-6): 190.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of plasma matrix metalloprotease-2 in pancreatic cancer patients
    Nidhi Singh, Surabhi Gupta, Ravindra M. Pandey, Peush Sahni, Shyam S. Chauhan, Anoop Saraya
    Indian Journal of Medical Research.2017; 146(3): 334.     CrossRef
  • CD147 and matrix-metalloproteinase-2 expression in metastatic and non-metastatic uveal melanomas
    Julia Lüke, Vlatka Vukoja, Tim Brandenbusch, Khaled Nassar, Jens Martin Rohrbach, Salvatore Grisanti, Matthias Lüke, Aysegül Tura
    BMC Ophthalmology.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • High Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinases: MMP-2 and MMP-9 Predicts Poor Survival Outcome in Colorectal Carcinoma
    Nada Salem, Ibrahim Kamal, Jaudah Al-Maghrabi, Adel Abuzenadah, Abdul Ali Peer-Zada, Yousif Qari, Mahmoud Al-Ahwal, Mohammed Al-Qahtani, Abdelbaset Buhmeida
    Future Oncology.2016; 12(3): 323.     CrossRef
  • Rab11-FIP2 promotes colorectal cancer migration and invasion by regulating PI3K/AKT/MMP7 signaling pathway
    Chang-long Xu, Jian-zhang Wang, Xuan-ping Xia, Chen-wei Pan, Xiao-xiao Shao, Sheng-long Xia, Shou-xing Yang, Bo Zheng
    Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications.2016; 470(2): 397.     CrossRef
  • Shikonin inhibits the cell viability, adhesion, invasion and migration of the human gastric cancer cell line MGC-803 via the Toll-like receptor 2/nuclear factor-kappa B pathway
    Ji Ping Liu, Dan Liu, Jun Fei Gu, Mao Mao Zhu, Li Cui
    Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmacology.2015; 67(8): 1143.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of MMP-7 expression in colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis
    Da-wei Sun, Ying-yi Zhang, Yue Qi, Xing-tong Zhou, Guo-yue Lv
    Cancer Epidemiology.2015; 39(2): 135.     CrossRef
  • Immunoexpression of metalloproteinase 14 and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase 2 in colorectal carcinomas and lymph node metastases
    Francisco Nélson Nóbrega Furtado, João Paulo Aguiar Sampaio, João Tarcisio Alves Maia-Filho, Renato Braga Vieira, Roberto César Pereira Lima-Júnior, Ronaldo Albuquerque Ribeiro, Paulo Roberto Carvalho Almeida
    Comparative Clinical Pathology.2015; 24(6): 1367.     CrossRef
  • MMP-2/9-oriented combinations enhance antitumor efficacy of EGFR/HER2-targeting fusion proteins and gemcitabine
    YE QIN, XIU-JUN LIU, LIANG LI, XU-JIE LIU, YI LI, RUI-JUAN GAO, RONG-GUANG SHAO, YONG-SU ZHEN
    Oncology Reports.2014; 32(1): 121.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Role of Tumor-Associated Proteases in Colorectal Cancer
    N. E. Kushlinskii, E. S. Gershtein, E. A. Korotkova, V. V. Prorokov
    Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine.2013; 154(3): 365.     CrossRef
  • Novel roles of liver sinusoidal endothelial cell lectin in colon carcinoma cell adhesion, migration and in-vivo metastasis to the liver
    Yunfei Zuo, Shuangyi Ren, Min Wang, Biao Liu, Juntao Yang, Xuezhang Kuai, Changwei Lin, Dianyuan Zhao, Li Tang, Fuchu He
    Gut.2013; 62(8): 1169.     CrossRef
  • Patterns of FOXE1 Expression in Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma by Immunohistochemistry
    Andrey Bychkov, Vladimir Saenko, Masahiro Nakashima, Norisato Mitsutake, Tatiana Rogounovitch, Alyaksandr Nikitski, Florence Orim, Shunichi Yamashita
    Thyroid.2013; 23(7): 817.     CrossRef
  • Matrix metalloproteinase 2 overexpression and prognosis in colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis
    Mumu Shi, Bo Yu, Hongguo Gao, Jingwen Mu, Changwei Ji
    Molecular Biology Reports.2013; 40(1): 617.     CrossRef
Clinical Impact of Tumor Regression Grade after Preoperative Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Subset Analyses in Lymph Node Negative Patients
Byung Soh Min, Nam Kyu Kim, Ju Yeon Pyo, Hoguen Kim, Jinsil Seong, Ki Chang Keum, Seung Kook Sohn, Chang Hwan Cho
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(1):31-40.   Published online February 28, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.1.31
  • 5,414 View
  • 46 Download
  • 10 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Background

We investigated the prognostic significance of tumor regression grade (TRG) after preoperative chemoradiation therapy (preop-CRT) for locally advanced rectal cancer especially in the patients without lymph node metastasis.

Methods

One-hundred seventy-eight patients who had cT3/4 tumors were given 5,040 cGy preoperative radiation with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin chemotherapy. A total mesorectal excision was performed 4-6 weeks after preop-CRT. TRG was defined as follows: grade 1 as no cancer cells remaining; grade 2 as cancer cells outgrown by fibrosis; grade 3 as a minimal presence or absence of regression. The prognostic significance of TRG in comparison with histopathologic staging was analyzed.

Results

Seventeen patients (9.6%) showed TRG1. TRG was found to be significantly associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS; P = 0.001) and local recurrence (P = 0.039) in the univariate study, but not in the multivariate analysis. The ypN stage was the strongest prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis. Subgroup analysis revealed TRG to be an independent prognostic factor for the CSS of ypN0 patients (P = 0.031). TRG had a stronger impact on the CSS of ypN (-) patients (P = 0.002) than on that of ypN (+) patients (P = 0.521). In ypT2N0 and ypT3N0, CSS was better for TRG2 than for TRG3 (P = 0.041, P = 0.048), and in ypN (-) and TRG2 tumors, CSS was better for ypT1-2 than for ypT3-4 (P = 0.034).

Conclusion

TRG was found to be the strongest prognostic factor in patients without lymph node metastasis (ypN0), and different survival was observed according to TRG among patients with a specific histopathologic stage. Thus, TRG may provide an accurate prediction of prognosis and may be used for f tailoring treatment for patients without lymph node metastasis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Tumor Regression Grade as a Prognostic Factor in Metastatic Colon Cancer Following Preoperative Chemotherapy
    Yufei Yang, Dakui Luo, Ruoxin Zhang, Sanjun Cai, Qingguo Li, Xinxiang Li
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2022; 21(2): 96.     CrossRef
  • Prediction of tumor response of rectal cancer cells via 3D cell culture and in�vitro cytotoxicity assay before initiating preoperative chemoradiotherapy
    Jeonghyun Kang, Min Park, Jina Kim, Hyuk Hur, Byung Min, Seung Baik, Kang Lee, Nam Kim
    Oncology Letters.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic significance of tumour regression grade after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for a cohort of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: an 8‐year retrospective single‐institutional study
    L. Xu, S. Cai, T. Xiao, Y. Chen, H. Qiu, B. Wu, G. Lin, X. Sun, J. Lu, W. Zhou, Y. Xiao
    Colorectal Disease.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: how important is tumour regression?
    Melanie J. McCoy, Chris Hemmings, Simon Hillery, Cheryl Penter, Max K. Bulsara, Nik Zeps, Cameron F. Platell
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2017;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Defining response to radiotherapy in rectal cancer using magnetic resonance imaging and histopathological scales
    Muhammed R S Siddiqui, Jemma Bhoday, Nicholas J Battersby, Manish Chand, Nicholas P West, Al-Mutaz Abulafi, Paris P Tekkis, Gina Brown
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(37): 8414.     CrossRef
  • Interobserver agreement of radiologists assessing the response of rectal cancers to preoperative chemoradiation using the MRI tumour regression grading (mrTRG)
    M.R.S. Siddiqui, K.L. Gormly, J. Bhoday, S. Balyansikova, N.J. Battersby, M. Chand, S. Rao, P. Tekkis, A.M. Abulafi, G. Brown
    Clinical Radiology.2016; 71(9): 854.     CrossRef
  • Controversies in the pathological assessment of colorectal cancer
    Aoife Maguire
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2014; 20(29): 9850.     CrossRef
  • The prognostic value of tumour regression grade following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for rectal cancer
    K. I. Abdul‐Jalil, K. M. Sheehan, J. Kehoe, R. Cummins, A. O'Grady, D. A. McNamara, J. Deasy, O. Breathnach, L. Grogan, B. D. P. O'Neill, C. Faul, I. Parker, E. W. Kay, B. T. Hennessy, P. Gillen
    Colorectal Disease.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pathological grading of regression: an International Study Group perspective
    Runjan Chetty, P Gill, Adrian C Bateman, David K Driman, Dhirendra Govender, Andrew R Bateman, Y J Chua, Godman Greywoode, Christine Hemmings, I Imat, Eleanor Jaynes, Cheok Soon Lee, Michael Locketz, Corwyn Rowsell, Anne Rullier, Stefano Serra, Eva Szentg
    Journal of Clinical Pathology.2012; 65(10): 865.     CrossRef
  • Pathological grading of regression following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: the clinical need is now: Table 1
    Tom P MacGregor, Tim S Maughan, Ricky A Sharma
    Journal of Clinical Pathology.2012; 65(10): 867.     CrossRef
Microsatellite Instability-low Colorectal Carcinomas: Are They Comparable with Microsatellite Stable Cancer?.
Paek, Ok Joo , Oh, Seung Yeop , Kim, Young Bae , Suh, Kwang Wook
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(2):145-151.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.2.145
  • 2,425 View
  • 16 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) colorectal cancer (CRC) displays a well-described distinct phenotype, but the true biological significance of MSI-low (L) is still uncertain. To clarify the significance of this MSI-L, we studied the differences between patients with CRC with MSI-H, MSI-L, and microsatellite stability (MSS).
METHODS
A total of 723 consecutive patients (429 males and 294 females) who had undergone resections between September 2002 and August 2007 were studied. We analyzed the clinicopathological features, the MSI statuses, and the prognoses of the 723 CRC patients.
RESULTS
MSI-H was observed in 54 (7.5%), MSI-L in 27 (3.7%), and MSS in 642 (88.8%) of the 723 colorectal cancer patients. MSI-L and MSS CRC share similar clinicopathological features. A univariate analysis showed no significant differences in overall survival between MSI-L, MSS, and MSI-H. In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, MSI-L was significantly (P=0.036) associated with poorer prognosis compared with MSS tumors, after adjustment for factors previous shown to be associated with the survival based on potentially relevant variables.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the current study showed no difference in the clinicopathological features of MSI-L versus MSS CRCs. However, in the multivariate analysis, patients with MSI-L CRCs had significantly poorer overall survival. Finally, these findings support the existence of MSI-L CRCs as a distinct category. Thus, further studies are required to explore possible reasons for the adverse prognosis associated with MSI-L cancers.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • MSI‐L/EMAST is a predictive biomarker for metastasis in colorectal cancer patients
    Amir Torshizi Esfahani, Seyed Yoosef Seyedna, Ehsan Nazemalhosseini Mojarad, Ahmad Majd, Hamid Asadzadeh Aghdaei
    Journal of Cellular Physiology.2019; 234(8): 13128.     CrossRef
Survival Rate and Prognostic Factors in Perforated Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Case-Control Study.
Kim, Min Sang , Lim, Seung Woo , Park, Sung Jin , Gwak, Geumhee , Yang, Keun Ho , Bae, Byung Noe , Kim, Ki Hwan , Han, Sewhan , Kim, Hong Joo , Kim, Young Duck , Kim, Hong Yong
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(1):69-75.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.1.69
  • 2,465 View
  • 14 Download
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Perforations are rare but serious complications in colorectal cancer. Controversy exists over whether to perform a radical operation because colorectal cancer perforation is considered as an advanced stage disease, and septic complications of peritonitis have been identified as being responsible for a poor prognosis. The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between the survival rate and the clinicopathological parameters that might be used as predictive factors of the prognosis for perforated colorectal cancer.
METHODS
The analysis was based on 24 cases of perforated colorectal cancer (the case group), 48 cases of matching uncomplicated colorectal cancer (the control group), and 72 cases of the case and the control groups combined together (the combined group), all of which were identified during a 10-yr period in a single institution.
RESULTS
The five-year survival rates of the perforated colorectal cancer patients and their matching controls were similar (P=0.484). No significant differences in the locations of the cancer, the pre-operative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels, the tumor sizes, the resection margins, or the numbers of the lymph nodes harvested were found between the two groups. A univariate analysis of the prognostic factors that influenced the case group revealed that adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.004) was significantly correlated to a better five-year survival rate. A univariate analysis of the prognostic factors that influenced the five-year survival rate of the combined group revealed that the stage (P<0.001), the pre-op CEA level (P=0.018), the angio invasion (P=0.019), the perineural invasion (P=0.019), the number of harvested lymph nodes (P=0.004), and adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.001) were significantly correlated to the five-year survival rate. The identified independent prognostic factors in the combined group were the stage (hazard ratio, 5.20), angio-invasion (hazard ratio, 2.81), and adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.17).
CONCLUSION
The clinical pathway of perforated colorectal cancer is similar to that of uncomplicated colorectal cancer. Therefore, perforated colorectal cancer patients should be recommended for treatment with the appropriate radical operation and adjuvant chemotherapy based on oncologic principles.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio is a Crucial Criterion in Colorectal Cancer Therapy Management and Prognosis
    Gülçin Harman Kamalı, Sedat Kamalı
    European Archives of Medical Research.2022; 38(1): 73.     CrossRef
  • Acute Abdomen in the Oncology Patient
    Katrina McGinty
    Seminars in Roentgenology.2020; 55(4): 400.     CrossRef
  • Nonobstetrical Acute Abdomen during Pregnancy as a Consequence of Colorectal Carcinoma Perforation: Case Report and Review of the Literature
    Žana Žegarac, Željko Duić, Sandra Stasenko
    Case Reports in Gastrointestinal Medicine.2019; 2019: 1.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Value of Perineural Invasion in Colorectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Yuchong Yang, Xuanzhang Huang, Jingxu Sun, Peng Gao, Yongxi Song, Xiaowan Chen, Junhua Zhao, Zhenning Wang
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2015; 19(6): 1113.     CrossRef
  • Surgical management of obstructed and perforated colorectal cancer: still debating and unresolved issues
    Rudra K Maitra, Charles A Maxwell-Armstrong
    Colorectal Cancer.2013; 2(6): 573.     CrossRef
  • Multivariate Analysis of the Survival Rate for Treatment Modalities in Incurable Stage IV Colorectal Cancer
    Sung Kang Kim, Chang Ho Lee, Min Ro Lee, Jong Hun Kim
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2012; 28(1): 35.     CrossRef
Expression of LDH-5 in Colorectal Carcinomas: Correlation with Prognosis and Tumor Angiogenesis.
Ahn, Tae Sung , Kim, Chang Jin , Jung, Dong Jun , Park, Dong Guk , Cho, Sung Woo , Kim, Sung Young , Lee, Moon Soo , Kim, Chang Ho , Cho, Moo Sik , Baek, Moo Jun
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(1):62-68.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.1.62
  • 11,468 View
  • 12 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Lactate dehydrogenase-5 (LDH-5) is one of five isoenzymes and is the most important for anaerobic glycolysis. LDH-5 is transcriptionally regulated by hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF). HIF plays a role in the response to hypoxia by activating genes involved in vascular remodeling, cell proliferation, and erythropoiesis. In this study, we investigated the clinicopathologic significance and angiogenesis of LDH-5 expression in colorectal cancer.
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 83 patients with colorectal cancer who underwent a surgical resection at Soonchunhyang Cheonan Hospital from January 2001 to December 2003. LDH-5 and HIF-1alpha protein expressions were evaluated in 83 human colorectal cancer specimens. These factors were related to TNM stage, lymph node metastasis, vascular, neural, and lymphatic invasion, and prognosis.
RESULTS
LDH-5 was positive in 66% (55 patients) of the tumors, and HIF-1alpha was positive in 66% (55 patients) of the tumors. LDH-5 expression was significantly associated with HIF-1alpha protein expression (P<0.001). Also, LDH-5 expression was significantly associated with TNM stage and lymph node metastasis (P<0.001) while HIF-1alpha expression was significantly associated with TNM stage (P<0.001), lymph node metastasis (P<0.001), vascular invasion (P=0.011), and lymphatic invasion (P=0.005). The survival of the patients with high LDH-5 expression was worse than that of patients with low LDH-5 expression (P=0.032).
CONCLUSION
Our study shows a high expression of LDH-5 in colorectal cancer. The up-regulation of LDH-5 parallels an increase in HIF-1alpha expression. The immunohistochemical assessment of tissue LDH-5 and HIF-1alpha provides important prognostic information for colorectal carcinomas.
Prognosis and Recurrent Patterns of Sporadic Primary Colon Cancers According to Location.
Park, Jin Seok , Yu, Chang Sik , Kim, Chan Wook , Jeong, Kwang Yong , Shin, Ui Sup , Yoon, Sang Nam , Lim, Seok Byung , Kim, Jin Cheon
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2009;25(4):221-226.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2009.25.4.221
  • 2,369 View
  • 28 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
We aimed to compare the prognosis and the recurrence patterns of sporadic primary colon cancers according to the location of the cancer. METHODS: One thousand four-hundred eighty-three (1,483) stage II, III colon cancer patients who had undergone a consecutive curative resection between January 1989 and December 2003 were analyzed. Hereditary, synchronous, metachronous, and recurrent colon cancers were excluded. The right colon was defined as being from the cecum to the transverse colon, and the left colon was defined as being from the splenic flexure colon to the rectosigmoid colon. The median follow-up time was 63 (3-228) mo. RESULTS: Poorly differentiated and mucinous cell type tumors were more frequent in the right colon. T3 tumors were more frequent in the right colon. Lymph-node-positive tumors were more frequent in the left colon. The recurrence rate was higher in the left colon, but the patterns of recurrence were not different according to the tumor's location. By univariate analysis, age, preoperative serum CEA level, T-stage, N-stage, lymphovascular invasion, postoperative chemotherapy, and tumor location were significant prognostic factors associated with recurrence. By multivariate analysis, sex, preoperative serum CEA level, T-stage, N-stage, postoperative chemotherapy, and tumor location were significant prognostic factors associated with recurrence. The 5-yr disease-free survival rates were 84.0% for right colon cancer and 77.1% for left colon cancer (P=0.005). The recurrence rates for cancers in the sigmoid colon and the rectosigmoid colon were higher than those for cancers in the cecum and the ascending colon. CONCLUSION: The tumor's location was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence, but the pattern of recurrence did not vary with the tumor's location.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Survival analysis for colon subsite and rectal cancers: Experience from a single surgeon
    Inhwa Lee, Seung-Hyun Baek, Hyunsung Kim, Hong-Jae Jo, Nahm-Gun Oh, Sanghwa Ko
    Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology.2015; 11(2): 114.     CrossRef
Clinical Trials
Clinical Significance of Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Level at Diagnosis of Liver Metastases in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.
Nam, Jung Su , Shin, Jin Yong , Kim, Kyoung Ha , Park, Jeong Ik , Kim, Woon Won , Choi, Chang Soo , Choi, Young Gil , Hong, Kwan Hee
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2008;24(6):439-446.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2008.24.6.439
  • 4,303 View
  • 9 Download
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
In numerous clinical trials to stratify prognosis of patients with liver metastases (LM) from colorectal cancer (CRC), the clinical value of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels at diagnosis of LM has not been fully investigated in these group. The aim of this study is to explore the relation of CEA to characteristics of LM and to analyze prognostic value of this widely used tool.
METHODS
We retrospectively analyzed clinical data of 143 LM patients who were performed surgical intervention or non-surgical intervention. The cohort was divided into two groups; normal CEA group (NCEAG, <5 ng/ml, n=41) and elevated CEA group (ECEAG, > or =5 ng/ml, n=102). We examined correlation between serum CEA at diagnosis of LM and other clinicopathologic factors and performed univariate and multivariate analyses to determine the clinical impact of this marker on survival.
RESULTS
Compared to ECEAG, the characteristics of LM of NCEAG was associated with unilobar distribution of LM (P=0.003), less metastases (P<0.001), less rate of synchronocity (P=0.008) and more surgical intervention of hepatic deposits (P<0.001). The 5-year survival rate for NCEAG was better than ECEAG (P=0.031). Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of lymphatic duct invasion, no performance of chemotherapy, bilobar distribution of LM, and treatment of non-surgical intervention had a significant effect on survival. CEA elevation was identified as independently associated with bilobar distribution and non-surgical intervention of LM.
CONCLUSIONS
Although CEA level is not a independent prognostic factor in this study, the clinical characteristics identified in this study and correlation to non surgical intervention of LM may help better patient selection in the management of CRC LM patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Prognostic value of increased postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with early intestinal anastomosis leakage who underwent right hemicolectomy surgery
    Seifollah Rezaei, Naser Masoudi, Mohammad Yasin Karami, Ehsan Sobhanian, Morteza Amestejani, Ali Jafari
    Polish Journal of Surgery.2022; 95(1): 24.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level as an independent prognostic factor in potentially curative colon cancer
    Jung Wook Huh, Byung Ryul Oh, Hyeong Rok Kim, Young Jin Kim
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2010; 101(5): 396.     CrossRef
Prognostic Value of Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate in Patients with Colorectal Cancer.
Kim, Young Ki , Hong, Seong Woo , Chun, Jung Woo , Chang, Yeo Goo , Paik, In Wook , Lee, Hyucksang
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2008;24(5):351-356.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2008.24.5.351
  • 4,077 View
  • 30 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Prognostic indicators are used increasingly in clinical trials and to guide surveillance for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). The significance of a preoperative, elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) as a predictive indicator for malignancy and for prognosis in colorectal cancer has not been elucidated. Hence, the current study was conducted to evaluate the ESR as a prognostic indicator in patients with CRC.
METHODS
This study enrolled 232 patients who underwent surgery in our hospital between 1997 and 2004. ESR with clinicopathologic features and overall survival were evaluated retrospectively.
RESULTS
The ESRs of 139 patients were elevated, and those of 93 patients were normal. Elevated ESR was associated with the male gender, decreased hemoglobin, increased platelet count, high preoperative CEA, high preoperative CA19-9, tumor size (> or =5 cm), T stage, and TNM stage. Patients with elevated ESR had poorer survival (P=0.001), but a multivariate analysis did not reveal an elevated ESR as an independent factor for prognosis.
CONCLUSIONS
Preoperative elevation of ESR in patients with CRC suggests the presence of a tumor with aggressive behavior and a poor outcome.
Original Articles
Outcomes after a Hepatic Resection for Multiple Hepatic Metastases from Colorectal Cancer.
Choi, Pyong Wha , Kim, Hee Cheol , Jung, Sang Hun , Kim, Dae Dong , Park, In Ja , Yu, Chang Sik , Kim, Jin Cheon
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2008;24(2):100-106.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2008.24.2.100
  • 2,380 View
  • 10 Download
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Surgical resection is still considered as the gold standard in patients with hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. The impact of the number of hepatic metastases is a controversial issue. We aimed to evaluate the outcomes and the prognostic factors after hepatic resection in multiple hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. METHODS: Between June 1989 and October 2005, 42 patients underwent hepatic resections for three or more hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. Disease-free survival analyses were performed on patients grouped as a function of the following factors: age, sex, preoperative serum CEA level, primary tumor site, nodal status, intrahepatic distribution, diameter of the liver lesion, their number, and the resection margin. RESULTS: Of the 42 patients, 29 (69.0%) developed recurrence (16 in the liver alone, 5 in the liver and another distant site, 8 in a distant site alone) during a median follow-up of 24 months. The overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates were 89.1%, 58.6%, and 31.8%, respectively. The 1-year and 2-year disease-free survival rates were 38.1 and 29.4%, respectively. There was no postoperative mortality and the morbidity rate was 11.9%. The disease-free survival rate was independently associated with the resection margin of the metastatic tumor (P=0.017). The 1-year disease- free survival rates in patients with more than a 5-mm resection margin and with less than a 5-mm resection margin were 72.7%, and 25.8%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
If technically feasible, an aggressive hepatic resection should be performed for the treatment of multiple hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. The surgical resection margin may govern the outcomes in patients with surgically curable hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Scoring of prognostic factors that influence long-term survival in patients with hepatic metastasis of colorectal cancer
    Sung Woo Ahn, Ahn Soo Na, Jae Do Yang, Hong Pil Hwang, Hee Chul Yu, Baik Hwan Cho
    Korean Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.2011; 15(3): 146.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Resection for Primary Colorectal Cancer on Outcomes in Patients with Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases
    Jung Wook Huh, Chol  Kyoon Cho, Hyeong Rok Kim, Young Jin Kim
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2010; 14(8): 1258.     CrossRef
Prognostic Significance of p27(kip1) Expression in Node Negative Colorectal Carcinoma.
Song, Sang Hyun , Bae, Byung Noe , Lee, Woo Yong , Yang, Keun Ho , Kim, Ki Hwan , Han, Se Hwan , Kim, Hong Ju , Kim, Young Duk , Kim, Hong Yong , Kim, Jung Yeon
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2007;23(1):34-40.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2007.23.1.34
  • 1,770 View
  • 7 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Dukes' A & B colorectal cancer patients are often excluded from adjuvant chemotherapy following potentially curative surgery because they are expected to have good long-term survival. However, actually 20 ~ 30% of these patients suffer from recurrent disease, so it would be helpful for these patients of recurrent disease to be able to select a high risk group.
METHODS
In 78 Dukes' A & B colorectal cancers, we investigated by immunohistochemistry the role of molecular markers, such as p27(kip1), p53, Ki-67, and Skp2, in identifying high-risk patients.
RESULTS
Patients with low p27(kip1) expression showed poor overall survival compared to those with high p27(kip1) expressions (55.3 versus 66.7 months, P=0.018). The only significant factor associated with p27(kip1) expression was p53 expression. The low p27(kip1) expression and positive p53 expression group had poor overall survival (54.3 months, P=0.036). CONCLISIONS: In a node-negative colorectal carcinoma, the molecular marker p27(kip1) does not play an independent prognostic role, but it may have prognostic significance in correlation with other markers such as p53, Ki-67, and Skp2. The assessment of molecular alterations may be useful to node-negative colorectal patients in identifying the high risk group that may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.
Clinical Significance of Lateral Resection Margin Involvement for Colon Cancer.
Lee, Nan Joo , Ha, Tae Geun , Shin, Jin Yong , Jeong, Su Jin , Hong, Kwan Hee
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2006;22(5):322-329.
  • 1,495 View
  • 14 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
The clinical significance of the lateral resection margin for rectal cancer has been widely investigated. The ascending and the descending colon do not have a peritoneal covering posteriorly. Therefore, colon cancers located on their posterior side can penetrate the entire bowel wall, which is similar to mesorectal invasion in rectal cancer. However, the prognostic significance of the retroperitoneal resection margin involvement is unknown. The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic significance of the lateral resection margin in ascending and descending colon cancer.
METHODS
A retrospective study was performed and involved 92 patients who had undergone a curative resection for right or left colon cancer with TNM stage II and III. The patients were assigned to either a lateral margin negative group (LMNG, n=73) or a lateral margin positive group (LMPG, n=19) according to the presence of a tumor or a metastatic lymph node within 1 mm of the lateral resection margin. The oncological outcomes of the LMPG were compared with those of the LMNG.
RESULTS
The LMPG was younger and had higher incidences of tumors positive vascular or neural invasion and advanced T and N stages. The overall recurrence rate of the LMPG was higher than that of the LMNG (36.8% versus 16.4%) and the cumulative survival rate of the LMPG was significantly lower than that of the LMNG (35.0% versus 76.2%). High preoperative CEA, lymphatic invasion, lateral margin involvement of the tumor, N2 in nodal status were significant factors in the univariate analysis for evaluation of the prognosis, but lateral margin involvement was not a significant factor in the multivariate analysis. In the lymph-node-positive group and the CEA non-elevation group, lateral margin involvement of the tumor was revealed as a prognostic factor.
CONCLUSIONS
Lateral margin involvement of ascending and descending colon cancer affects tumor recurrence and overall survival, but it is not a significant prognostic factor.
Expression of Survivin and Its Correlation with Prognosis in Colorectal Cancer.
Baek, Moo Jun , Lee, Eung Min , Kim, Chang Jin , Park, Nae Kyung , Shin, Eung Jin , Jang, Yong Seog , Kim, Jae Jun , Kim, Sung Yong , Lee, Moon Soo , Kim, Chang Ho , Song, Ok Pyung
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2006;22(2):125-131.
  • 1,306 View
  • 10 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Survivin is involved in both the control of cell division and the inhibition of apoptosis. Specifically, its anti-apoptotic function is related to the ability to inhibit caspases directly or indirectly. This study examined the expression patterns of survivin in normal colorectal tissues and in colorectal cancer tissues to determine whether the expression of survivin is associated with either the colorectal cancer characteristics or the prognosis.
METHODS
4micrometer sections of the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of colorectal cancer tissues were the immunostained using antibodies for survivin. The immunostain was recorded as 0~3 depending on the stain intensity distribution in the cytoplasm and the nucleus.
RESULTS
Survivin was localized in the nucleus and/or cytoplasm of tumor cells. We could differentiate between cytoplasmic and nuclear localization of survivin protein expression. Among the cancer expressions, 35.8% demonstrated nuclear staining, and 51.9% demonstrated cytoplasm staining. Statistical analysis revealed that cytoplasmic survivin expression was correlated with lymph-node metastasis, tumor stage, and patient survival.
CONCLUSIONS
Survivin expression was correlated with clinicopathologic prognostic parameters and with the outcome. Thus, it can be both a useful diagnostic marker for colorectal carcinomas and an important source of prognostic information for patients with a colorectal carcinoma. Survivin will become a potential new target in anti-cancer therapy in near future.
Impact of the Number of Lymph Nodes Retrieved on Reliability of Nodal Staging of Stage II Colorectal Carcinomas.
Lee, Tae Mu , Choi, Hong Jo , Park, Ki Jae , Kim, Jung Min , Roh, Young Hoon , Roh, Mee Sook
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2005;21(3):167-173.
  • 1,212 View
  • 6 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
The variety of outcomes in patients with stage II colorectal carcinomas might be due to understaging caused by an inadequate number of lymph nodes (LNs) being examined. The aim of this study was to determine if any number of examined LNs reflects a reliable node-negative staging for colorectal carcinomas (CRCs).
METHODS
Data on 241 patients (132 males) who underwent potentially curative resections for pT3 and pT4 CRC were reviewed. The patients ranged in age from 21 to 87 (mean: 58.2) years with a median follow-up of 43 (range: 7~96) months. The relationship between the number of LNs harvested and both the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) and the overall survival (OS) rates were assessed for stage II CRCs.
RESULTS
A median of 15 LNs (range: 3~104) was harvested per tumor specimen, and lymph-node metastases were present in 107 cases (44.4%). The proportion of lymph-node metastases increased as a function of the number of LNs harvested (P=0.0002; 95% confidence interval, 0.3333~0.8138). The number of LNs revealed to be the best number for dividing stage II patients into subgroups with different DFS and OS rates was ten. The 5-year DFS and OS rates of the 48 patients (35.8%) with nine or fewer LNs harvested were 68.6% and 76.8%, respectively, whereas those of the 86 patients (64.2%) with ten or more LNs harvested were 87.2% and 91.9%, respectively (DFS, P=0.0082; OS, P=0.0303). Moreover, there were no statistical differences between the node-negative patients with nine or fewer LNs harvested and the 67 stage III patients with N1 in respect to the DFS (68.6% vs. 56.7%; P= 0.2031) and the OS (76.8% vs. 68.3%; P=0.2772) rates.
CONCLUSIONS
This study suggests that examining a greater number of lymph nodes increases the likelihood of accurate nodal staging and that a minimum of ten LNs per surgical specimen should be harvested and examined to label a pT3 or pT4 CRC as node-negative.
Local Pelvic Recurrence after Curative Resection of the Rectal Cancer: Classification and Prognosis.
Park, Jea Kun , Kim, Nam Kyu , Baik, Seung Hyuk , Lee, Kang Young , Sohn, Seung Kook , Cho, Chang Hwan
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2005;21(2):82-88.
  • 1,386 View
  • 12 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
The management of local recurrence after curative surgery of the rectal cancer remains difficult clinical problems to surgeons. This study was performed to analyze the outcomes of patients with local pelvic recurrence according to its recurrence type.
METHODS
A total 109 patients with local recurrence were evaluated. Among the 109 patients 62 were local recurrence alone and 47 were both local and systemic recurrence. The recurrence type was classified as Central, Anterior, Posterior, Lateral and Perineal recurrence according to the relation of the tumor location and either intra pelvic organ and/or fixed pelvic structure.
RESULTS
Only 26 (23.9%) of the 109 patients had curative resection and the remaining 83 (76.1%) patients had palliative exploration or nonsurgical procedure. The resectability according to the recurrence type showed that the Central and Anterior type was higher than other type of recurrences (P=0.001). When the primary operation was Abdominoperineal Resection (APR) the resectability was poorer than Low Anterior Resection (LAR) (P=0.0001). When comparing the patients with local recurrence alone, the 5 year survival rate was significantly higher patients treated by curative resection than palliative or non-resection group (P=0.002). Mean follow up period was 44.2+/-30.0 months and mean recurrence time between primary operation and recurrence was 26.0+/-22.7 months.
CONCLUSIONS
Resection for central type of the recurrent is potentially curative, however treatment failure was common when the recurrence invaded fixed pelvic structure. Our data suggest that local pelvic recurrence should be treated with radical resection as can as possible.
The Characteristics and Prognosis of Patients with Obstructing Carcinoma of the Left Colon and Rectum: A Case-Control Study.
Lee, In Taek , Choi, Gyu Seog , Lee, Jong Ho
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2004;20(5):303-310.
  • 1,226 View
  • 5 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Many reports have described significantly lower survival rates for patients with obstructing colorectal cancer than for patients with non-obstructing colorectal cancer. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the long-term prognosis of patients with obstructing carcinomas of the left colon and rectum and to identify the clinical and pathologic characteristics that affect the prognosis.
METHODS
From June 1996 to October 2003, 46 patients with obstructing left colon and rectal cancer underwent curative surgery (case group), and from the patients with non- obstructing left colon and rectal cancer who had curative surgery, 48 patients with clinicopathologic characteristics similar to those of the case group were selected and matched as a control group. A comparative analysis of demographic, clinical, and pathologic characteristics, the recurrence rate, and the long-term survival rate between these two groups was done.
RESULTS
Emergency operations were done more frequently for obstructing cancer than for non-obstructing cancer (P=0.0001), and more patients with obstructing cancer presented to non-specialists (P=0.0001). The overall recurrence rate was significantly higher in obstructing cancer patients than in non-obstructing cancer patients. Further, the 5-year overall and the disease-free survival rates were significantly lower in obstructing cancer patients when examining either overall patient outcome or stage-III patients outcome.
CONCLUSIONS
The long-term prognosis of patients with obstructing carcinomas of the left colon and rectum is poor. We suggest that the poor general condition of patients with obstructing cancer, the increased number of emergency operations involving those patients, and more patients with obstructing cancer presenting to non-specialists may contribute to poor long-term prognosis for obstructing cancer patients.
Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression in Colorectal Cancer.
Kang, Won Kyung , Cheon, Joon Sung , Chang, Seh Jin , Cho, Hyun Min , Chun, Sung Won , An, Chang Hyeok , Oh, Seong Taek
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2004;20(2):112-117.
  • 1,182 View
  • 4 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Cyclooxygenase (COX) is an important enzyme that transforms arachidonic acid into prostaglandins and exists as two types of isoenzyme, COX-1 and COX-2. Recently, the expression of COX-2 was presented as an important factor in determining the prognosis in colorectal cancer, and the expressed COX-2 was related with recurrence and liver metastasis after an operation for colorectal cancer. Thus this study was to investigate the relationship between COX-2 expression and the prognosis for colorectal cancer.
METHODS
We studied colorectal cancer patients who received operations at the Catholic University of Korea from Jan. 1993 through Dec. 2000, by reviewing their medical records and pathological reports. We used immunohistochemistry to determine the expression rate of COX-2 and to study its relationship with other clinical variables, the disease-free survival rat, and the recurrence rate.
RESULTS
Among the 217 cases, 171 cases (78.8%) showed positive COX-2 expression. The COX-2 expression increased with the differentiation and was lower in cases with lymph-node metastasis. However, no statistically significant difference in age, sex, location of lesion, invasiveness, stage, organ of metastasis, disease-free survival rate, and recurrence existed between patients with positive COX-2 expression and those with negative COX-2 expression.
CONCLUSIONS
There is no evidence that COX-2 expression is associated with a poor prognosis for colorectal cancer.
Characteristic Clinical Behaviors of and Prognosis for Mucinous Adenocarcinomas in the Colon and Rectum.
Yu, Yeun Sik , Kim, Hee Cheol , Park, Sang Jun , Yu, Jang Hak , Kim, Jung Sun , Lee, Gang Hong , Yu, Chang Sik , Kim, Jin Cheon
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2003;19(6):379-385.
  • 1,149 View
  • 11 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
The clinical significance of a mucinous-type colorectal adenocarcinoma is still controversial. Mucinous colorectal adenocarcinomas have been suggested to have distinct clinicopathologic features, i.e., early-onset, right-side dominancy, and poor prognosis. We aimed to verify the biological behaviors of and survivals for mucinous adenocarcinomas compared with non-mucinous adenocarcinomas.
METHODS
Using a database of colorectal cancers at Asan Medical Center between 1989 and 2000, we enrolled 121 mucinous adenocarcinoma and 2,289 non-mucinous adenocarcinoma patients in this study. Clinical, pathological characteristics of and prognoses for mucinous adenocarcinomas were analyzed and compared with those for non-mucinous adenocarcinomas, retrospectively. The median follow-up period was 24 (0~113) months for mucinous adenocarcinomas and 32 (0~130) months for non-mucinous adenocarcinoma.
RESULTS
Compared to non-mucinous adenocarcinomas, mucinous adenocarcinomas showed distinctive clinicopathologic features of early-onset (P<0.001), frequent family history (P<0.001), right-side dominancy (P=0.010), advanced stage at diagnosis (P<0.001), and common peritoneal seeding at diagnosis (P<0.001). The recurrence rate in the mucinous adenocarcinoma group was 45.2% during the follow-up period: 21.6% distant metastasis, 14.3% peritoneal dissemination, 5.7% local recurrence, and 3.6% simultaneous local recurrence and distant metastasis. The five-year survival rates in stages II and III were 70% and 48.7%, respectively, for mucinous adenocarcinomas and 92% and 50.2%, respectively, for non-mucinous adenocarcinomas. This difference was statistically significant.
CONCLUSIONS
Mucinous adenocarcinomas seem to have distinct biologic behaviors with different clinicopathologic features and poor prognosis. A surgical approach with a follow-up schedule considering the characteristics of mucinous adenocarcinomas is needed.
The Clinical Features and Charateristics of anal Cancer Arising from Chronic Fistula-in-ano.
Son, Byung Ho , Han, Won Kon , Kim, Heung Dae , Kim, Kwang Yun
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2002;18(6):373-378.
  • 1,322 View
  • 10 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
The incidence of unhealed chronic fistula is about 7% and the cancer can occur in the longstanding unhealed fistula. The most of the cancer is mucinous adenocarcinoma. The report is diverse about treatment, adjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis. The purpose of this study is review of the clinical characteristics and survival of the anal cancer arising from chronic fistula-in-ano.
METHODS
The number of patients was 10. The diagnosis is made under pathological examination at the Kanbuk Samsung Hospital from 1983 to 2000. The retrograde study was done with patients' records and telephone questionnaire. The survival rate was calculated with Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS
All patients were male. The patients had symptoms of anal discharge and anal swelling suggesting the anal fistula. The patients had history of anal surgery. The external openings were multiple. Seven patients had mucinous adenocarcinoma. The prognosis was poor. Among 8 patients' follow-up data, except one patient, 7 patients died within 43 months.
CONCLUSIONS
The anal cancer can occur in longstanding unhealed fistula. In our series, all patients were male, and they had multiple opening fistula. The patient who had small size tumor have only survived. Through meticulous exploring and deep biopsy of the fistula, early detection is best method to treat the anal cancer arising from chronic fistula-in-ano.
Case Report
Natural Killer (NK) Cell Lymphoma of the Cecum with Perforation:A case of report.
Kim, Ik Yong , Ju, Man Ki , Kim, Jong Seok , Jung, Soon Hee , Kim, Dae Sung , Rhoe, Byoung Seon
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2001;17(5):277-282.
  • 1,400 View
  • 6 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Natural Killer cell lymphoma pursued a highly aggressive clinical course, with the aggressiveness and poor prognosis in this biologically distinct primary gastrointestinal lymphoma, a more vigorous systemic therapy should be considered in the addition to surgery. We report an unusual case of aggressive primary Natural Killer cell (NK cell) lymphoma of the cecum. A 38-year old man admitted for intractable fever, diarrhea, and hematochezia. The patient diagnosed as primary NK cell cecal lymphoma with perforation after surgical resection. The primary lesion was deep ulceration with perforation and it revealed metastasis to liver. The immunophenotype of the tumor cell were CD56+, CD3+, UCHL-1+, CD45RO+, polyclonal IGH, TCRr, so confirmed NK cell type lymphoma.
Original Articles
Clinical Significance of CEA Level of Peripheral Vein, Inferior Mesenteric Vein, Bile, and Peritoneal Fluid in Sigmoid Colon and Rectal Cancer.
Lee, Ju Young , Kim, Cheong Yong , Kim, Jae Han , Park, Sang Heon , Park, Jung Hi , Byun, Joo Nam
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2000;16(4):239-245.
  • 1,433 View
  • 8 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Carcinoembriogenic antigen (CEA) was widely used as a marker for staging and detection of recurrence and metastases, and evaluation of response of radical opertion or chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients.
METHODS
We examined 50 patients with sigmoid colon and rectal cancer patients who had a radical operation between 1994 May and 1995 April. We checked the level of CEA of peripheral blood preoperatively and postoperatively, and inferior mesenteric vein, bile of gall bladder and peritoneal fluid during surgery. We review clinical characters of the patients, and analyzed the importance of CEA level.
RESULTS
The mean CEA levels of peripheral blood (postoperation), inferior mesenteric vein, bile, peritoneal fluid were 5.35+/-2.65, 13.23+/-2.13, 9.23+/-1.65, 7.42+/-2.34 ng/ml respectlively. The mean CEA level of inferior mesentiric vein (13.23+/-2.13 ng/ml) was significantly higher than that of preoperative peripheral blood (8.13+/-2.34 ng/ml) (p<0.05). Falling of postoperative peripheral blood CEA level was also significantly lower than that of preoperative level (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Level of postoperative peripheral blood was related to recurrence rate and survival rate, but tumor size, tumor location, tumor differentiation, Dukes' stage were not related to the CEA level. Bile and peritoneal fluid CEA levels were related with the liver metastasis or local recurrence respectively. We suggest that CEA was useful indicator for evaluation, management, and prognosis of colorectal cancer not only preoperatively but also postoperatively.
Expression of Glucose Transporter Gene in Colorectal Cancer.
Lee, Suk Hwan , Park, Jae Hoon , Kim, Yoon Wha , Oh, Soo Myung , Yoon, Choong , Joo, Hoong Zae , Lee, Kee Hyung
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2000;16(2):57-66.
  • 1,555 View
  • 36 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
The primary metabolic characteristic of malignant cells is an increased uptake of glucose and its anaerobic glycolysis. Recent studies have demonstrated that facilitative glucose transport across the plasma membrane is mediated by a family of proteins, i.e., glucose transporters. PURPOSE: In order to evaluate the clinicopathologic correlations of glucose transporter genes expressed in colorectal cancer, the author studied the expression of glucose transporter genes in human colorectal cancer and analyzed their expression in normal and malignant colorectal tissues.
METHODS
A reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was applied to quantitatively determine the levels of the glucose transporter genes, GLUT1 and GLUT3, from Crohnes diseases (N=2), adenomatous polyps (N=4), and colorectal cancers (N=40) and their normal counterparts.
RESULTS
The expresssion of the GLUT1 gene was detected in 50% of the inflammatory colonic mucosae and adenomatous polyp tissues, but the levels of expression were not significantly different from their normal counterparts. Among the 40 colorectal cancer patients, 23 patients (57.5%) showed GLUT1 gene expression and the levels of expression were increaed by 1.8 as compared to their normal counterparts (p<0.05). The expression of the GLUT3 gene was detected in almost all tissues examined, and the levels of expression were not significantly different from their normal counterparts. In colorectal cancers, there was correlation between GLUT1 expression, the extent of lymph node involvement and the stage of colorectal cancers (p<0.05). But, the correlation between the expressions of the GLUT3 gene and the clinicopathologic prognostic factors of colorectal cancers could not be determined because almost all tissues showed a GLUT3 gene expression.
CONCLUSIONS
In conclusion, the GLUT1 glucose transporter expression in colorectal cancer was associated with high possibilities of lymph node metastases and poorer prognosis, and the assessment of GLUT1 expression in colorectal cancer would be useful in identifying high risk patients.

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP