Metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPNs) in rectal cancer significantly impact the prognosis and treatment strategies. Western practices emphasize neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), whereas Eastern approaches often rely on LPN dissection (LPND). This review examines the evolving role of LPND in the context of modern treatments, including total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), and the impact of CRT on the management of clinically suspicious LPNs. We comprehensively reviewed the key literature comparing the outcomes of LPND versus preoperative CRT for rectal cancer, focusing on recent advancements and ongoing debates. Key studies, including the JCOG0212 trial and recent multicenter trials, were analyzed to assess the efficacy of LPND, particularly in conjunction with preoperative CRT or TNT. Current evidence indicates that LPND can reduce local recurrence rates compared to total mesorectal excision alone in patients not receiving radiation therapy. However, the benefit of LPND in the context of neoadjuvant CRT is influenced by the size and pretreatment characteristics of LPNs. While CRT can effectively control smaller metastatic LPNs, larger or clinically suspicious LPNs may require LPND for optimal outcomes. Advances in surgical techniques, such as robotic-assisted LPND, offer potential benefits but also present challenges and complications. The role of TNT in controlling metastatic LPNs and improving patient outcomes is emerging but remains underexplored. The decision to perform LPND should be individualized based on patient-specific factors, including LPN size, response to neoadjuvant treatment, and surgeon expertise. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment protocols and further evaluating the role of TNT in managing metastatic LPNs.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Who is a candidate at the initial presentation? Prediction of positive lateral lymph node and survival after dissection Y. Lee Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The oncologic benefits of lateral lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant therapy – local control or survival? T. Sammour Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Locally‐Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Cohort Study Comparing Perioperative Morbidity and Short‐Term Oncological Outcomes Joseph Mathew, Yogesh Kisan Bansod, Nishant Yadav, Janesh Murugan, Kovvuru Bhaskar Reddy, Mufaddal Kazi, Ashwin DeSouza, Avanish Saklani Cancer Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in colorectal cancer management: a narrative review of clinical efficacy and multidisciplinary integration Engeng Chen, Li Chen, Wei Zhang Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
From the Editor: Uniting expertise, a new era of global collaboration in coloproctology In Ja Park Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 285. CrossRef
Kiho You, Jung-Ah Hwang, Dae Kyung Sohn, Dong Woon Lee, Sung Sil Park, Kyung Su Han, Chang Won Hong, Bun Kim, Byung Chang Kim, Sung Chan Park, Jae Hwan Oh
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(6):502-512. Published online December 26, 2023
Purpose Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is currently the standard treatment for rectal cancer. However, its limitations include complications and incomplete total mesorectal resection (TME) due to anatomical features and technical difficulties. Transanal TME (TaTME) has been practiced since 2010 to improve this, but there is a risk of local recurrence and intra-abdominal contamination. We aimed to analyze samples obtained through lavage to compare laparoscopic TME (LapTME) and TaTME.
Methods From June 2020 to January 2021, 20 patients with rectal cancer undergoing MIS were consecutively and prospectively recruited. Samples were collected at the start of surgery, immediately after TME, and after irrigation. The samples were analyzed for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 20 (CK20) through a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The primary outcome was to compare the detected amounts of CEA and CK20 immediately after TME between the surgical methods.
Results Among the 20 patients, 13 underwent LapTME and 7 underwent TaTME. Tumor location was lower in TaTME (7.3 cm vs. 4.6 cm, P=0.012), and negative mesorectal fascia (MRF) was more in LapTME (76.9% vs. 28.6%, P=0.044). CEA and CK20 levels were high in 3 patients (42.9%) only in TaTME. There was 1 case of T4 with incomplete purse-string suture and 1 case of positive MRF with dissection failure. All patients were followed up for an average of 32.5 months without local recurrence.
Conclusion CEA and CK20 levels were high only in TaTME and were related to tumor factors or intraoperative events. However, whether the detection amount is clinically related to local recurrence remains unclear.
Purpose Although partial mesorectal excision (PME) and total mesorectal excision (TME) is primarily indicated for the upper and lower rectal cancer, respectively, few studies have evaluated whether PME or TME is more optimal for middle rectal cancer.
Methods This study included 671 patients with middle and upper rectal cancer who underwent robot-assisted PME or TME. The 2 groups were optimized by propensity score matching of sex, age, clinical stage, tumor location, and neoadjuvant treatment.
Results Complete mesorectal excision was achieved in 617 of 671 patients (92.0%), without showing a difference between the PME and TME groups. Local recurrence rate (5.3% vs. 4.3%, P>0.999) and systemic recurrence rate (8.5% vs. 16.0%, P=0.181) also did not differ between the 2 groups, in patients with middle and upper rectal cancer. The 5-year disease-free survival (81.4% vs. 74.0%, P=0.537) and overall survival (88.0% vs. 81.1%, P=0.847) also did not differ between the PME and TME groups, confined to middle rectal cancer. Moreover, 5-year recurrence and survival rates were not affected by distal resection margins of 2 cm (P=0.112) to 4 cm (P>0.999), regardless of pathological stages. Postoperative complication rate was higher in the TME than in the PME group (21.4% vs. 14.5%, P=0.027). Incontinence was independently associated with TME (odds ratio [OR], 2.009; 95% confidence interval, 1.015–3.975; P=0.045), along with older age (OR, 4.366, P<0.001) and prolonged operation time (OR, 2.196; P=0.500).
Conclusion PME can be primarily recommended for patients with middle rectal cancer with lower margin of >5 cm from the anal verge.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Review of definition and treatment of upper rectal cancer Elias Karam, Fabien Fredon, Yassine Eid, Olivier Muller, Marie Besson, Nicolas Michot, Urs Giger-Pabst, Arnaud Alves, Mehdi Ouaissi Surgical Oncology.2024; 57: 102145. CrossRef
Tumour-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and functional outcomes Fabio Carbone, Wanda Petz, Simona Borin, Emilio Bertani, Stefano de Pascale, Maria Giulia Zampino, Uberto Fumagalli Romario European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 49(11): 107069. CrossRef
Purpose Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) has been proposed to overcome surgical difficulties encountered during rectal resection, especially for patients having high body mass index or low rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate oncologic outcomes following TaTME.
Methods This retrospective study included all consecutive patients with rectal cancer who had a TaTME from 2013 to 2019. The main outcome was the incidence of locoregional recurrence by the end of the follow-up period.
Results Among a total of 81 patients, 96.3% were male, and their mean age was 63±9 years. The mean body mass index was 30.3±5.7 kg/m2, and the median distance from tumor to anal verge was 5.0 cm (interquartile range [IQR], 4.0–6.0 cm). Most patients had a low anterior resection performed (n=80, 98.8%) with a diverting ileostomy (n=64, 79.0%). Distal and circumferential resection margins were positive in 2.5% and 6.2% of patients, respectively. Total mesorectal excision was complete or near complete in 95.1% of patients. A successful resection was achieved in 72 patients (88.9%). After a median follow-up of 27.5 months (IQR, 16.7–48.1 months), 4 patients (4.9%) experienced locoregional recurrence. Anastomotic leaks were observed in 21 patients (25.9%). At the end of the follow-up, 69 patients (85.2%) were stoma-free.
Conclusion TaTME was associated with acceptable oncological outcomes, including low locoregional recurrence rates in selected patients with low rectal cancer. Although associated with a high incidence of postoperative morbidities, the use of TaTME enabled a high rate of successful sphincter-saving procedures in selected patients who posed a technical challenge.
Purpose Complex anal fistulas can recur after clinical healing, even after a long interval which leads to significant anxiety. Also, ascertaining the efficacy of any new treatment procedure becomes difficult and takes several years. We prospectively analyzed the validity of Garg scoring system (GSS) to predict long-term fistula healing.
Methods In patients operated for cryptoglandular anal fistulas, magnetic resonance imaging was performed preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively to assess fistula healing. Scores as per the GSS were calculated for each patient at 3 months postoperatively and correlated with long-term healing to check the accuracy of the scoring system.
Results Fifty-seven patients were enrolled, but 50 were finally included (7 were excluded). These 50 patients (age, 41.2±12.4 years; 46 men) were followed up for 12 to 20 months (median, 17 months). Forty-seven patients (94.0%) had complex fistulas, 28 (56.0%) had recurrent fistulas, 48 (96.0%) had multiple tracts, 20 (40.0%) had horseshoe tracts, 15 (32.0%) had associated abscesses, 5 (10.0%) were suprasphincteric, and 8 (16.0%) were supralevator fistulas. The GSS could accurately predict long-term healing (high positive predictive value, 31 of 31 [100%]) but was not very accurate in predicting nonhealing (negative predictive value, 15 of 19 [78.9%]). The sensitivity in predicting healing was 31 of 35 (88.6%).
Conclusion GSS accurately predicts long-term fistula with a high positive predictive value (100%) but is less accurate in predicting nonhealing. This scoring system can help allay anxiety in patients and facilitate the early validation of innovative procedures for anal fistulas.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Recent Advances in the Understanding and Management of Anal Fistula from India Vipul D. Yagnik, Sandeep Kumar, Anshul Thakur, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Sushil Dawka, Pankaj Garg Indian Journal of Surgery.2024; 86(6): 1105. CrossRef
Rectovaginal Fistulas Not Involving the Rectovaginal Septum Should Be Treated Like Anal Fistulas: A New Concept and Proposal for a Reclassification of Rectovaginal Fistulas Pankaj Garg, Laxmikant Ladukar, Vipul Yagnik, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Gurleen Kaur Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology.2024; Volume 17: 97. CrossRef
Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of complex anal fistula Pankaj Garg, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Vipul D. Yagnik, G. Mahak Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 321. CrossRef
Predictors of outcome in cryptoglandular anal fistula according to magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review Alireza Teymouri, Amir Keshvari, Ali Ashjaei, Seyed Mohsen Ahmadi Tafti, Faeze Salahshour, Faezeh Khorasanizadeh, Amirhosein Naseri Health Science Reports.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Pankaj Garg: A Community Doctor to a Master Innovator to a Global Icon David N. Armstrong, Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska, Vincent de Parades, Francesco Litta, Manuel Limbert, Khaw C. W. James Global Journal of Medical, Pharmaceutical, and Biomedical Update.2023; 18: 16. CrossRef
Purpose Perianal fistula is one of the most common anorectal diseases in adult patients, especially men. A relationship between pyogenic perianal abscess and fistula formation is established in multiple domains. This is the first exploration of such association among patients in the country as no related study has been published in Bahrain. We expect this study to be a foundation for future protocols and evidence-based practice.
Methods A retrospective study was conducted in Salmaniya Medical Complex of Bahrain. A total of 109 patients with a diagnosis of anal abscess were included between 2015 and 2018. Data were collected from the electronic files database used in Salmaniya Medical Complex (iSeha) as well as phone calls to the patients. Collected data were analyzed using statistical software.
Results The most predominant presentation of perianal abscess was pain. Over 50% of abscesses were classified as perianal (56.9%) and among those, left-sided abscesses were more common, followed by right-, posterior-, and anterior-sited, respectively. No recurrence of abscess was recorded among 80% of patients. A fistula developed following abscess drainage in 33.9% of patients. Most fistulas (37.8%) were diagnosed within 6 months or less from abscess drainage. Posterior fistulas were the most common, followed by anterior and left-sided fistulas.
Conclusion The incidence of anal fistula in Bahrain after perianal abscess was 33.9%. Most of the patients who developed a fistula following pyogenic abscess drainage were males and above the age of 40 years. The most common site for fistula was posterior.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Risk factors for perianal abscess recurrence after incision and drainage: a review of the literature Kheira Gabsi International Surgery Journal.2025; 12(2): 255. CrossRef
Anal Cryptoglandular Suppuration Oladapo Akinmoladun, Quinton M. Hatch Surgical Clinics of North America.2024; 104(3): 491. CrossRef
Proposal for a new classification of anorectal abscesses based on clinical characteristics and postoperative recurrence Shan-Zhong Chen, Kui-Jun Sun, Yi-Fan Gu, Hong-Yuan Zhao, Dong Wang, Yun-Fang Shi, Ren-Jie Shi World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(11): 3425. CrossRef
Research Progress on Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Perianal Deep Space Abscess 永罡 秦 Advances in Clinical Medicine.2023; 13(01): 180. CrossRef
Case Report
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer
Some patients who have undergone preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) following surgery have been diagnosed with late recurrence more than 5 years after treatment, raising questions about the possible benefit extending surveillance beyond the recommended 5 years. In 2011, a 71-year-old male patient was diagnosed with T3N+ low-lying rectal cancer located 3 cm from the anal verge before undergoing long-course preoperative CRT. After CRT, the patient was reexamined and diagnosed with ycT1–2N0 lesion, so local excision (LE) was performed. The patient underwent intensive surveillance for up to 5 years, and no evidence of recurrence was found. At 74 months after surgery, the patient was hospitalized for a hematochezia, and local recurrence at the excision site and peritoneal seeding nodules were identified. Considering the late recurrence in this patient, it might be necessary to long-term follow-up beyond 5 years in patients with preoperative CRT followed by LE.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Coccygodynia in a Long-Term Cancer Survivor Diagnosed with Metastatic Cancer: A Case Report Jung Hyun Park, Seong Jin Park, Dulee Kim, Jae Hoo Park, So Young Kwon Medicina.2024; 60(8): 1365. CrossRef
Purpose According to the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus guidelines, rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) up to 10 mm in size and without poor prognostic factors could be safely removed with endoscopic resection, suggesting omitting surveillance colonoscopy after complete resection. However, the benefit of surveillance colonoscopy is still unknown. In this study, we aimed to report the outcomes after endoscopic resection of small rectal NETs using our surveillance protocol.
Methods This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent endoscopic resection for rectal NETs sized up to 10 mm from January 2013 to December 2019 at our center. We excluded patients without surveillance colonoscopy and those lost to follow-up. We strictly performed surveillance colonoscopy 1 year after endoscopic resection, and every 2 to 3 years thereafter. The primary outcomes were tumor recurrence and occurrence of metachronous tumors during followup.
Results Of the 54 patients who underwent endoscopic resection for rectal NETs during the study period, 46 were enrolled in this study. The complete resection rates by endoscopic mucosal resection, precutting endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection were 92.3% (12 of 13), 100% (21 of 21), and 100% (12 of 12), respectively. There was no local or distant recurrence during the median follow-up of 39 months. However, we found that 8.7% (4 of 46) of patients developed metachronous NETs. All metachronous lesions were treated with precutting endoscopic mucosal resection.
Conclusion Surveillance colonoscopy is reasonable after endoscopic resection of small rectal NETs for timely detection and treatment of metachronous lesions. However, larger collaborative studies are needed to influence the guidelines.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Comparison of the efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery in the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 2 cm Rui Jin, Xiaoyin Bai, Tianming Xu, Xi Wu, Qipu Wang, Jingnan Li Frontiers in Endocrinology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Current status of the role of endoscopy in evaluation and management of gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors Zaheer Nabi, Sundeep Lakhtakia, D. Nageshwar Reddy Indian Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 42(2): 158. CrossRef
Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer
Purpose We evaluated the oncological outcomes of bridge to surgery (BTS) using stent compared with surgery alone for obstructive colorectal cancer.
Methods Consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for stages II to III obstructive colorectal cancer at our institution from January 2009 to March 2020, were registered retrospectively and divided into 43 patients in the BTS group and 65 patients in the surgery alone group. We compared the surgical and oncological outcomes between the 2 groups.
Results Stent-related perforation did not occur. One patient in whom the stent placement was unsuccessful underwent emergency surgery with poor decompression (clinical success rate, 97.7%). The pathological characteristics were not significantly different between the groups. The following surgical outcomes in the BTS group were superior to those in the surgery alone group; nonemergency surgery (P<0.001), surgical approach (P=0.006), and length of hospital stay (P=0.020). The median follow-up time was 44.9 months (range, 1.1–126.5 months). The 3-year relapse-free survival rates were 68.4% and 58.2% (P=0.411), and the overall survival rates were 78.3% and 88.2% (P=0.255) in the surgery alone and BTS groups, respectively. The 3-year locoregional recurrence rates were 10.2% and 8.0% (P=0.948), and distant metastatic recurrence rates were 13.3% and 30.4% (P=0.035) in the surgery alone and BTS groups, respectively.
Conclusion This study revealed that BTS with stent may be associated with a higher frequency of distant metastatic recurrence. Stent for stages II to III obstructive colorectal cancer potentially worsens oncological outcomes.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Controversial issues of colon stenting in case of tumor obstructive intestinal obstruction: surgical and oncological aspects S.A. Aliyev, E.S. Aliyev, T.K. Aliyev Endoscopic Surgery.2025; 31(2): 65. CrossRef
Transforming outcomes: the pivotal role of self-expanding metal stents in right- and left-sided malignant colorectal obstructions-bridge to surgery: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis Sheza Malik, Priyadarshini Loganathan, Hajra Khan, Abul Hasan Shadali, Pradeep Yarra, Saurabh Chandan, Babu P. Mohan, Douglas G. Adler, Shivangi Kothari Clinical Endoscopy.2025; 58(2): 240. CrossRef
A rare case of massive colonic distention secondary to undiagnosed colon adenocarcinoma Chloe Lahoud, Toni Habib, Michel Al Achkar, Tyler Grantham, Nissar Ahmed Medical Reports.2025; 12: 100207. CrossRef
Complete Obstruction, a Real Risk Factor: A Comprehensive Study on Obstruction in Stage IIA Colon Cancer With Propensity Score Matching Analysis Soo Young Oh, Chan Wook Kim, Seonok Kim, Min Hyun Kim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2024; 23(2): 135. CrossRef
Can we use colon stenting in accelerated recovery programs for surgical treatment colon cancer complicated by obstructive intestinal obstruction? A literature review Saday A. Aliyev, Emil S. Aliyev Russian Journal of Oncology.2024; 29(2): 130. CrossRef
Oncologic impact of colonic stents for obstructive left-sided colon cancer Hideyuki Suzuki, Shingo Tsujinaka, Yoshihiro Sato, Tomoya Miura, Chikashi Shibata World Journal of Clinical Oncology.2023; 14(1): 1. CrossRef
5-year oncological outcomes in left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: stent as bridge to surgery Noura S Alhassan, Sulaiman A AlShammari, Razan N AlRabah, Amirah M AlZahrani, Maha-Hamadien Abdulla, Thamer A Bin Traiki, Ahmad M Zubaidi, Omar A Al-Obeed, Khayal A Alkhayal BMC Gastroenterology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098. CrossRef
Do Laparoscopic Approaches Ensure Oncological Safety and Prognosis for Serosa-Exposed Colon Cancer? A Comparative Study against the Open Approach Ji-Hyun Seo, In-Ja Park Cancers.2023; 15(21): 5211. CrossRef
Recurrence Patterns and Risk Factors after Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: Insights for Postoperative Surveillance Strategies Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim, Ye Ryung Park, Eun Hae Cho, Jeong Min Choo, Ji-Seon Kim, Se-Jin Baek, Jung-Myun Kwak Cancers.2023; 15(24): 5791. CrossRef
Colonic stent for bridge to surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: A review of the literature after 2020 Margherita Binetti, Augusto Lauro, Valeria Tonini World Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 13(12): 957. CrossRef
Purpose Risk factors for recurrence of rectal prolapse after surgery remain unclear. Delorme’s procedure is often selected for relatively small-sized rectal prolapse, but there are few reports discussing the association between prolapsed rectum length and prolapse recurrence after Delorme’s procedure. We hypothesized that patients with longer rectal prolapses are at a higher risk of recurrence after Delorme’s procedure.
Methods The study population comprised patients with rectal prolapse who underwent Delorme’s procedure between January 2014 and December 2019 at Tokyo Yamate Medical Center. We extracted data on patient age, sex, body mass index, previous history of anal surgery, previous history of surgery for rectal prolapse, and length of prolapse, to identify risk factors for prolapse recurrence.
Results Altogether, 96 patients were eligible for analysis. The median length of the prolapsed rectum was 3.0 cm (range, 1.0–6.6 cm). Twenty-four patients (25.0%) experienced recurrence after Delorme’s procedure after a median of 7.5 months (interquartile range, 3.2–20.9 months). Multivariate analysis revealed that longer prolapsed rectum length increased the risk of recurrence after Delorme’s procedure (hazard ratio, 6.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.83–21.50; P<0.001).
Conclusion The length of the prolapsed rectum should be measured before Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse, because length is associated with a risk of recurrence after the surgery.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Surgical approaches for complete rectal prolapse Long Wu, Huan Wu, Song Mu, Xiao-Yun Li, Yun-Huan Zhen, Hai-Yang Li World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Tratamiento quirúrgico del prolapso rectal completo del adulto C. Korkmaz, G. Meurette EMC - Técnicas Quirúrgicas - Aparato Digestivo.2024; 40(1): 1. CrossRef
Trattamento chirurgico del prolasso rettale completo dell’adulto C. Korkmaz, G. Meurette EMC - Tecniche Chirurgiche Addominale.2024; 30(1): 1. CrossRef
The Predictive Risk Factor of Postoperative Recurrence Following Altemeier's and Delorme's Procedures for Full-thickness Rectal Prolapse: An Analysis of 127 Japanese Patients in a Single Institution Yasuyuki Miura, Kimihiko Funahashi, Akiharu Kurihara, Satoru Kagami, Takayuki Suzuki, Kimihiko Yoshida, Mitsunori Ushigome, Tomoaki Kaneko Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2024; 8(3): 171. CrossRef
Modified Altemeier Procedure as Management for Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse in a Young Healthy Male Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review Leenah Abdulgader, Ebtesam Al-Najjar, Bayan Khasawneh, Abdullah Esmail Medicina.2024; 60(11): 1872. CrossRef
Traitement chirurgical du prolapsus rectal complet de l’adulte C. Korkmaz, G. Meurette EMC - Techniques chirurgicales - Appareil digestif.2023; 40(4): 1. CrossRef
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy
Purpose Recurrence patterns in rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) are needed to evaluate for establishing tailored surveillance protocol.
Methods This study included 2,215 patients with locally-advanced mid and low rectal cancer treated with radical resection between January 2005 and December 2012. Recurrence was evaluated according to receipt of PCRT; PCRT group (n = 1,258) and no-PCRT group (n = 957). Early recurrence occurred within 1 year of surgery and late recurrence after 3 years. The median follow-up duration was 65.7 ± 29 months.
Results The overall recurrence rate was similar between the PCRT and no-PCRT group (25.8% vs. 24.9%, P = 0.622). The most common initial recurrence site was the lungs in both groups (50.6% vs. 49.6%, P = 0.864), followed by the liver, which was more common in the no-PCRT group (22.5% vs. 33.6%, P = 0.004). Most of the recurrence occurred within 3 years after surgery in both groups (85.3% vs. 85.8%, P = 0.862). Early recurrence was more common in the PCRT group than in the no-PCRT group (43.1% vs. 32.4%, P = 0.020). Recurrence within the first 6 months after surgery was significantly higher in the PCRT group than in the no-PCRT group (18.8% vs. 7.6%, P = 0.003). Lung (n = 27, 44.3%) and liver (n = 22, 36.1%) were the frequent the first relapsed site within 6 months after surgery in PCRT group.
Conclusion Early recurrence within the first 1 year after surgery was more common in patients treated with PCRT. This difference would be considered for surveillance protocols and need to be evaluated in further studies.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Efficacies of radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision or other types of surgery: an updated meta-analysis Wenshu Wang, Runyuan Zhao, Xi Liang, Manjun Liu, Haiyan Bai, Jianli Ge, Binxi Yao, Zheng Zhi, Jianming He Oncology Reviews.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Watch and wait strategies for rectal cancer: A systematic review In Ja Park Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(2): 91. CrossRef
Update on Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal
Cancer Chan Wook Kim The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
The watch-and-wait strategy versus radical resection for rectal cancer patients with a good response (≤ycT2) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(6): 350. CrossRef
Optimal Postoperative Surveillance Strategies for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study Min-Young Park, In-Ja Park, Hyo-Seon Ryu, Jay Jung, Min-Sung Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang-Sik Yu, Jin-Cheon Kim Cancers.2021; 13(14): 3502. CrossRef
Comparison between Local Excision and Radical Resection for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer in ypT0-1 Patients: An Analysis of the Clinicopathological Factors and Survival Rates Soo Young Oh, In Ja Park, Young IL Kim, Jong-Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim Cancers.2021; 13(19): 4823. CrossRef
Shifting Treatment Strategies to Prevent Early Relapse of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Eun Jung Park Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(6): 357. CrossRef
The ideal intervention in the treatment of perianal fistula prevents the onset of infection to speed healing and prevent fistula recurrence while maintaining the function of the anal sphincter. Currently, there is no consensus on the best recommended surgical technique for perianal fistula management. Several studies have shown that fistulotomy was an easy and safe procedure for treatment of perianal fistula. Lateral internal sphincterotomy is the usual procedure performed on an anal fissure to decrease the anal sphincter tone. This study reports a combination of fistulotomy and contralateral internal sphincterotomy procedures for recurrent and complex perianal fistula to prevent recurrence. Here, we report 5 cases of recurrent and complex perianal fistula. The combination of fistulotomy and contralateral internal sphincterotomy is a relatively easy and safe procedure for complex perianal fistulae. In our cases, we found neither recurrence nor postoperative anal incontinence.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Modified anal sphincter suspension improves anal function in patients with anal fistula Peng Chen American Journal of Translational Research.2024; 16(9): 4858. CrossRef
Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistulous Tract vs Endorectal Advancement Flap for High-Type Fistula in Ano: A Randomized Controlled Trial Pankaj Kumar, Siddhant Sarthak, Pradeep K Singh, Tushar S Mishra, Prakash K Sasmal Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2023; 236(1): 27. CrossRef
Comparison of loose combined cutting seton and traditional cutting seton for high anal fistula: a meta-analysis Yi SUN, Chunqiang WANG, Tianye HUANG, Xuebing WANG Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is not normally produced in significant quantities after birth but is elevated in colorectal cancer. The aim of this review was to define the current role of CEA and how best to investigate patients with elevated CEA levels. A systematic review of CEA was performed, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were identified from PubMed, Cochrane library, and controlled trials registers. We identified 2,712 papers of which 34 were relevant. Analysis of these papers found higher preoperative CEA levels were associated with advanced or metastatic disease and thus poorer prognosis. Postoperatively, failure of CEA to return to normal was found to be indicative of residual or recurrent disease. However, measurement of CEA levels alone was not sufficient to improve survival rates. Two algorithms are proposed to guide investigation of patients with elevated CEA: one for patients with elevated CEA after CRC resection, and another for patients with de novo elevated CEA. CEA measurement has an important role in the investigation, management and follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
A fluorescent platform integrated with a “one-pot” nicking endonuclease signal amplification and magnetic separation for simultaneous detection of tumor markers Miaomiao Liu, Lie Liu, Mengsi Du, Qilong Li, Shiqi Wu, Shengxiang Su, Ningge Jian, Yongjun Wu, Yilin Wang Talanta.2025; 282: 127011. CrossRef
Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA 19-9 levels in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer treated with a self-expandable metallic stent and curative surgery Ryuichiro Sato, Masaya Oikawa, Tetsuya Kakita, Tomoya Abe, Naoya Akazawa, Haruka Okano, Kei Ito, Takashi Tsuchiya Surgery Today.2025; 55(5): 618. CrossRef
CAR-T cell therapy for breast cancer: Current status and future perspective Giuseppe Buono, Monica Capozzi, Roberta Caputo, Vincenzo Di Lauro, Daniela Cianniello, Michela Piezzo, Stefania Cocco, Claudia Martinelli, Annarita Verrazzo, Margherita Tafuro, Claudia Calderaio, Alessandra Calabrese, Francesco Nuzzo, Martina Pagliuca, Mi Cancer Treatment Reviews.2025; 133: 102868. CrossRef
A promising role of noble metal NPs@MOFs in chondrosarcoma management Ziheng Huang, Keyue Tian, Yiyuan Xue, Feng Luo Nanoscale.2025; 17(6): 2961. CrossRef
Electrochemical biosensor based on composite of gold nanoparticle/reduced-graphene oxide/graphitic carbon nitride and a caprolactone polymer for highly sensitive detection of CEA Yunpeng Li, Xia Wang, Xinling Wang, Zhe Qin, Chong Li, Jing Yang, Mengmeng Cao Bioelectrochemistry.2025; 163: 108897. CrossRef
Advances and challenges of metal-organic frameworks in the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer Min Ye, Yingqi Lu, Peiyan Zou, Luyi Zhou, Govindhan Maduraiveeran, Yong Huang, Yanqiong Peng Materials Today Chemistry.2025; 43: 102517. CrossRef
Preoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen as a Predictor of 5-Year Survival in Rectal Cancer: Proposing a New Prognostic Cutoff Amir Keshvari, Seyed Mohsen Ahmadi Tafti, Mohammad Reza Keramati, Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli, Alireza Kazemeini, Behnam Behboudi, Reza Akbari Asbagh, Anahita Mirzasadeghi Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Klinefelter Syndrome Sans Malignancy with Unusually Elevated Levels of CEA: A Case Report Xinxin Wo, Xiaoyan Yu, Lingling Miao, Yushan Mao, Keke Tang Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity.2025; Volume 18: 233. CrossRef
Nanomaterial-based biosensors for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) detection: principles, applications, and perspectives: A review Siyuan Zhao, Yuxi Zhang, Yafang Wu, Yinglin Wang, Dezhi Li, Qing Liu Microchemical Journal.2025; 210: 112992. CrossRef
Advancing Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer: A Brief Review of Emerging Adoptive Cell Therapies Deepak Sherpally, Ashish Manne Cancers.2025; 17(4): 589. CrossRef
Assessing the diagnostic value of oncological biomarkers for identifying primary malignancies in skeletal metastatic disease Sanna Matilainen, Hanna Liikanen, Riitta Lassila, Minna K. Laitinen European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2025; 51(6): 109688. CrossRef
A novel photocleavable amino-modified graphene for covalent purification of N-glycans from hepatocellular carcinoma patients’ serum for potential biomarkers discovery Xuyuan Chao, Shengjie Yang, Baoying Zhang, Xin Zang, Jingyi Zhang, Xizi Liu, Lu Chen, Lu Qi, Xiaofeng Xue, Han Hu, Xinghe Wang Cancer Nanotechnology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
On‐Paper Enzyme‐Linked and Metal‐Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Low‐Cost Decentralized Testing of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Electra Mermiga, Varvara Pagkali, Dionysios Soulis, Christos Kokkinos, Anastasios Economou Analysis & Sensing.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Circulating Biomarkers of Thyroid Cancer: An Appraisal Marta Codrich, Alessia Biasotto, Federica D’Aurizio Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(5): 1582. CrossRef
Prognostic role of postoperative persistence of ctDNA molecular signature after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: Preliminary results from a prospective study Roberto Montalti, Francesco Pepe, Gianluca Cassese, Gianluca Russo, Umberto Malapelle, Chiara Carlomagno, Mariano Cesare Giglio, Giacinto Falco, Mariantonietta Alagia, Giuseppe De Simone, Karen Geboes, Giancarlo Troncone, Roberto Ivan Troisi, Gianluca Rom European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2025; 51(6): 109706. CrossRef
Fecal bacterial biomarkers and blood biochemical indicators as potential key factors in the development of colorectal cancer Ping Cai, Qingzhen Yang, Jiaqi Lu, Xiaoyu Dai, Jinbo Xiong, Nicholas Chia mSystems.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
CA19-9, CEA and PIVKA-Ⅱ as a novel panel of serum markers for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer Meifang Wang, Hongying Bu, Weijia Luo, Xi Zeng, Guodong Chen, Yingchun He, Deliang Cao Clinical Biochemistry.2025; 137: 110902. CrossRef
Carbon dots: Review of recent applications and perspectives in bio-sensing and biomarker detection Xeniya Terzapulo, Aiym Kassenova, Alissa Loskutova, Rostislav Bukasov Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research.2025; 47: 100771. CrossRef
Comparative analysis of alpha-fetoprotein, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen, and prostate-specific antigen among conventional cigarette smokers, heated tobacco product users and quitters Dae-Hyun Kim, Seung-Wan Hong, Naeun Park Tobacco Induced Diseases.2025; 23(March): 1. CrossRef
Exploring targets in oropharyngeal cancer – association with immune markers and AI‐scoring of B7‐H3 expression Jacklyn Liu, Helen Bewicke‐Copley, Shruti Patel, Oscar Emanuel, Nicholas Counsell, Shachi J. Sharma, Volker Schartinger, Oliver Siefer, Ulrike Wieland, Nora Würdemann, Rocio Garcia‐Marin, Jozsef Dudas, Dominic Patel, David Allen, Naomi Guppy, Josep Linare Clinical and Translational Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Diagnostic value of peripheral blood inflammatory indices for clinicopathological profile of colorectal cancer: a retrospective observational study Mohammad Rezazadeh, Amirreza Kamyabi, Ramtin Ghamkhari Pisheh, Sahar Noroozie, Bahareh Shateri Amiri, Alireza Negahi, Hanieh Radkhah BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Electrochemical detection of circulating-free DNA methylation: A new indicator for early cancer screening Han Peng, Liyue Sun, Jie Zhao, Guofeng Cui Talanta.2025; 292: 127925. CrossRef
Clinical Value of Serum sTim-3, CEA, CA15-3 for Postoperative Recurrence of Breast Cancer Ting Shen, Hongming Fang, Jialong Wu, Yuan Qin, Xiumei Zhou, Xueqin Zhao, Biao Huang, Haiyan Gao Cancer Management and Research.2025; Volume 17: 517. CrossRef
Survival analysis and prediction of early-onset colorectal cancer patients post-chemotherapy: an analysis based on the SEER database Zhiguo Tang, Guojia Zhou, Yu Xu, Yinxu Zhang International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The coadministration of Lactobacillus probiotic augments the antitumor effect of telmisartan in rats Ahmed M. El-Baz, Amany A. El-Mahmoudy, Sameh Saber, Marwa T. ElRakaiby AMB Express.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
TsRNA-49–73-Glu-CTC: A promising serum biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer Chenyu Li, Shenjie Zhong, Juan Chen, Xiaofeng Mu, Jun Hyeok Lim PLOS ONE.2025; 20(3): e0320187. CrossRef
A microfluidic electrochemical immunosensor for detection of CEA and Ki67 in 3D tumor spheroids Sujin Kim, Seonyeop Kim, Chanjin Ko, Wonseok Lee, Hwan Drew Kim Materials Today Bio.2025; 32: 101768. CrossRef
Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Elevation in Routine Screening Unveils Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma Farha Munira Mohamed Kamel, Noor Azimah Muhammad, Amir Zharif Adenan Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Detection of Cancer Biomarkers: Review of Methods and Applications Reported from Analytical Perspective Xeniya Terzapulo, Aigerim Dyussupova, Aisha Ilyas, Aigerim Boranova, Yegor Shevchenko, Saule Mergenbayeva, Olena Filchakova, Abduzhappar Gaipov, Rostislav Bukasov Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry.2025; : 1. CrossRef
Enhanced Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer via Blood Biomarker Combinations Identified Through Extracellular Vesicle Isolation and Artificial Intelligence Analysis Bonhan Koo, Young Il Kim, Minju Lee, Seok‐Byung Lim, Yong Shin Journal of Extracellular Vesicles.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA): Origin, Role in Oncology, and Concentrations in Serum and Peritoneal Fluid Julia Niedzielska, Tomasz Jastrzębski Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(9): 3189. CrossRef
Kaempferol as a potent sensitizer for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to boost therapeutic index in colorectal cancer therapy Abhilasha Sharma, Anshu Thakur, Mehul R. Chorawala, Rakesh M. Rawal, Neeta Shrivastava Food Bioscience.2025; 69: 106973. CrossRef
Advances in the roles and molecular mechanisms of exosomal circular RNAs in regulating the pre-metastatic niche of tumors Wei Xu, Luyu Zhu, Shiqi Zhang, Xiaoyan Wang, Dandan Gong, Yu Fan Discover Oncology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Research progress of microfluidic chip for detecting tumor protein biomarkers in blood tests Zhaoyi Feng, Yafang Wu, Yinglin Wang, Ye Zhang, Lei Zhang, Dezhi Li, Qing Liu Microchemical Journal.2025; 214: 114113. CrossRef
Development of a Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor Based MXene ($${mathbf{T}mathbf{i}}_{3}{mathbf{C}}_{2}{mathbf{T}}_{mathbf{x}}$$) for the Detection of Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Ali Khodaie, Hamid Bahador, Hamid Heidarzadeh Plasmonics.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Consensus Statements for Clinical Practice in Advanced/Metastatic Colorectal Cancers in India Using a Modified Delphi Method Anant Ramaswamy, Sujay Srinivas, Viraj Lavingia, Mounika Boppana, Chakor Vora, Randeep Singh, M. Vamshi Krishna, Amish Vora, Sujith Kumar Mullapally, Prabhat Bhargava, Vinayak Maka, Gautam Goyal, Vivek Agarwala, Ashay Karpe, Jimmy Mirani, S Krupa Shankar, South Asian Journal of Cancer.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Medullary Thyroid Cancer Discovered Through Elevated Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels Post Colorectal Cancer Resection Andrew Glaza, Jeffrey Margolis Annals of Internal Medicine: Clinical Cases.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Postoperative metastatic Krukenberg tumors with ARID1A and KRAS mutations in a patient with gastric cancer treated with oxaliplatin and tegafur: A case report Jie Wu, Suzhen Jiang, Qingling Shen, Hongxia Gong Oncology Letters.2025; 29(6): 1. CrossRef
A Wearable In‐Pad Diagnostic for the Detection of Disease Biomarkers in Menstruation Blood Lucas Dosnon, Thomas Rduch, Charlotte Meyer, Inge K. Herrmann Advanced Science.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Novel tumor marker index combining carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9: New prognostic factor for metastatic colorectal cancer Yusuf Ilhan, Onur Yazdan Balcik, Halil Goksel Guzel, Arif Hakan Onder, Bilgin Demir, Mehmet Nuri Baser, Ibrahim Karadag, Mehmet Fatih Ozbay, Tugrul Burak Genc, Sahnura Uzuntas, Oguz Poyrazoglu, Ismail Beypinar, Yakup Ergun, Banu Ozturk World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
CEA-Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles as a Nanovaccine Platform: In Vitro Evaluation of Cytocompatibility, Cellular Uptake, and Antigen Processing Razvan-Septimiu Zdrehus, Teodora Mocan, Lavinia Ioana Sabau, Cristian Tudor Matea, Flaviu Tăbăran, Teodora Pop, Cristian Delcea, Ofelia Mosteanu, Lucian Mocan Vaccines.2025; 13(7): 668. CrossRef
Determination of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) by surface plasmon resonance-enhanced total internal reflection ellipsometry (SPRe-TIRE) Aslı Erkal-Aytemur, Samet Şahin, Zafer Üstündağ, İbrahim Ender Mülazımoğlu, Mustafa Oguzhan Caglayan Instrumentation Science & Technology.2024; 52(2): 203. CrossRef
Peptide absent sequences emerging in human cancers Georgios Christos Tsiatsianis, Candace S.Y. Chan, Ioannis Mouratidis, Nikol Chantzi, Anna Maria Tsiatsiani, Nelson S. Yee, Apostolos Zaravinos, Verena Kantere, Ilias Georgakopoulos-Soares European Journal of Cancer.2024; 196: 113421. CrossRef
Electrochemical nanobiosensors for the detection of cancer biomarkers in real samples: Trends and challenges Fethi Achi, Aisha M. Attar, Abdellatif Ait Lahcen TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry.2024; 170: 117423. CrossRef
Biosensor-Based Nanodiagnosis of Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA): an Approach to Classification and Precise Detection of Cancer Biomarker Maryam Hariri, Vahid Alivirdiloo, Nastaran Safavi Ardabili, Sarah Gholami, Sajjad Masoumi, Mohammad Reza Mehraban, Mahsa Alem, Reza Shah Hosseini, Ahmad Mobed, Farhood Ghazi, Iraj Alipourfard BioNanoScience.2024; 14(1): 429. CrossRef
Circulating Tumour Cells in the Prediction of Bone Metastasis Siu-Wai Choi, Aria Kaiyuan Sun, Jason Pui-Yin Cheung, Jemmi Ching-Ying Ho Cancers.2024; 16(2): 252. CrossRef
Next-Generation CEA-CAR-NK-92 Cells against Solid Tumors: Overcoming Tumor Microenvironment Challenges in Colorectal Cancer Alexander Sebastian Franzén, Abdelhadi Boulifa, Clarissa Radecke, Sebastian Stintzing, Martin J. Raftery, Gabriele Pecher Cancers.2024; 16(2): 388. CrossRef
Normal CEA Levels After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Cytoreduction with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemoperfusion Predict Improved Survival from Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases Michael M. Wach, Geoffrey Nunns, Ahmed Hamed, Joshua Derby, Mark Jelinek, Curtis Tatsuoka, Matthew P. Holtzman, Amer H. Zureikat, David L. Bartlett, Steven A. Ahrendt, James F. Pingpank, M. Haroon A. Choudry, Melanie Ongchin Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(4): 2391. CrossRef
Electrochemically Synthesized MIP Sensors: Applications in Healthcare Diagnostics Akinrinade George Ayankojo, Jekaterina Reut, Vitali Syritski Biosensors.2024; 14(2): 71. CrossRef
Optical fiber sensing probe for detecting a carcinoembryonic antigen using a composite sensitive film of PAN nanofiber membrane and gold nanomembrane Jinze Li, Xin Liu, Hao Sun, Jiawei Xi, Chen Chang, Li Deng, Yanxin Yang, Xiang Li Optics Express.2024; 32(11): 20024. CrossRef
DNAzyme-based ultrasensitive immunoassay: Recent advances and emerging trends Meng Wang, Zhe Liu, Chang Liu, Wanghong He, Dui Qin, Minli You Biosensors and Bioelectronics.2024; 251: 116122. CrossRef
Predictive modeling algorithms for liver metastasis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review of the current literature Isaac Seow-En, Ye Xin Koh, Yun Zhao, Boon Hwee Ang, Ivan En-Howe Tan, Aik Yong Chok, Emile John Kwong Wei Tan, Marianne Kit Har Au Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.2024; 28(1): 14. CrossRef
Realizing the label-free sensitive detection of carcinoembryogenic antigen (CEA) in blood serum via a MNC-decorated flexible immunosensor Daisy Mehta, Sukhjot Kaur, Tharamani C. Nagaiah Analytical Methods.2024; 16(10): 1473. CrossRef
Postbiotic butyrate: role and its effects for being a potential drug and biomarker to pancreatic cancer Abinaya Elango, Vineeta Debbie Nesam, Padmaja Sukumar, Infancia Lawrence, Arunkumar Radhakrishnan Archives of Microbiology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Classifying Raman Spectra of Colon Cells Based on Machine Learning Algorithms Maria Lasalvia, Crescenzio Gallo, Vito Capozzi, Giuseppe Perna Photonics.2024; 11(3): 275. CrossRef
Electrochemical immunosensing of tumor markers Venkata Narayana Palakollu, Y. Veera Manohara Reddy, Mehdihasan I. Shekh, S.V. Prabhakar Vattikuti, Jaesool Shim, Rajshekhar Karpoormath Clinica Chimica Acta.2024; 557: 117882. CrossRef
Targeted Biodegradable Near-Infrared Fluorescent Nanoparticles for Colorectal Cancer Imaging Seock-Jin Chung, Kay Hadrick, Md Nafiujjaman, Ehsanul Hoque Apu, Meghan L. Hill, Md Nurunnabi, Christopher H. Contag, Taeho Kim ACS Applied Bio Materials.2024; 7(12): 7861. CrossRef
Use of tumor markers in distinguishing lung adenocarcinoma-associated malignant pleural effusion from tuberculous pleural effusion Ling Ai, Wenjun Wang, Jingyuan Li, Ting Ye, Yuying Li The American Journal of the Medical Sciences.2024; 368(2): 136. CrossRef
Carcinoembryonic antigen in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of focal liver lesions Osman Nuri Dilek, Dilara İrem Arslan Kahraman, Gökhan Kahraman World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(4): 999. CrossRef
Complex Presentation of Lung Cancer with Obstructive Jaundice Ruxandra Oprita, Bogdan Oprita, Ioana Adriana Serban, Lidia Aurelia Stefan, Ciprian Mihai Neacsu, Alice Elena Diaconu, Valentin Enache Reports.2024; 7(2): 30. CrossRef
A simplified lateral flow immunosensor for the assay of carcinoembryonic antigen in low-resource settings Ioanna Tsogka, Electra Mermiga, Varvara Pagkali, Christos Kokkinos, Anastasios Economou Analytical Methods.2024; 16(18): 2921. CrossRef
Relevance of glyco-biomakers and glycan profiles in cancer stem cells Rohit Pujari, Shiv Kumar Dubey Glycobiology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Prognostic prediction model of colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers Yu-Hang Diao, Si-Qi Rao, Xin-Peng Shu, Yong Cheng, Can Tan, Li-Juan Wang, Dong Peng World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(5): 1344. CrossRef
Label-free electrochemical biosensor based on dual amplification of gold nanoparticles and polycaprolactones for CEA detection Xia Wang, Zhe Qin, Fei Zhang, Chong Li, Xianxian Yuan, Jing Yang, Huaixia Yang Talanta.2024; 278: 126468. CrossRef
Biotin-functionalized nanoparticles: an overview of recent trends in cancer detection Sonia Fathi-karkan, Saman Sargazi, Shirin Shojaei, Bahareh Farasati Far, Shekoufeh Mirinejad, Marco Cordani, Arezoo Khosravi, Ali Zarrabi, Saeid Ghavami Nanoscale.2024; 16(27): 12750. CrossRef
Mortality rate and predictors of colorectal cancer patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis Zewdu Bishaw Aynalem, Abebaw Bires Adal, Temesgien Fentahun Ayele, Gashaw Melkie Bayeh, Almaw Genet Yeshiwas, Tadesse Miretie Dessie, Tilahun Degu Tsega BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Five-Segment THz Refractive Index Metamaterial Biosensor With Perfect Absorption for Carcinoembryonic Antigen Measurement Hamid Bahador IEEE Sensors Journal.2024; 24(16): 25715. CrossRef
Near-infrared light-enhanced colorimetric signal amplification strategy for tumor marker detection based on MoS2/CuO/Au nanocomposite Jiawang Xiang, Bing Zhang, Yuan Yuan, Zhihuan Zhao, Jianying Lin, Jing Li Microchimica Acta.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Development and validation of a novel combinational index of liquid biopsy biomarker for longitudinal lung cancer patient management Min-Yi Liao, Yun-Jie Hao, Ching-Shan Luo, Ching-Mei Chen, Po-Hao Feng, Hsin-Yu Yang, Da-Jeng Yao, Kang-Yun Lee, Fan-Gang Tseng The Journal of Liquid Biopsy.2024; 6: 100167. CrossRef
The AC010247.2/miR-125b-5p axis triggers the malignant progression of acute myelocytic leukemia by IL-6R Fang Xie, Jialu Xu, Lina Yan, Xia Xiao, Liang Liu Heliyon.2024; 10(18): e37715. CrossRef
Biofilm mediated integrin activation and directing acceleration of colorectal cancer Vaijayanthi Saravanan, Vinoj Gopalakrishnan, Maria Infant Majula Shifani Mahendran, Rajan Vaithianathan, Sowmya Srinivasan, Vinoth Boopathy, SriKrishna Krishnamurthy APMIS.2024; 132(10): 688. CrossRef
Comparison of the clinical efficacy of dienogest and drospirone/ethinyl estradiol in the treatment of ovarian endometriosis cysts Qian Xiao, Liwei Hong, Chun Li, Sijie Hong, Yunsong Li, Dingding Yu, Hongli Liu Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders.2024; 16(3-4): 134. CrossRef
Recent advances in surface plasmon resonance for the detection of ovarian cancer biomarkers: a thorough review Shahnam Valizadeh Shahbazlou, Somayeh Vandghanooni, Bahareh Dabirmanesh, Morteza Eskandani, Sadegh Hasannia Microchimica Acta.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Expression of regulatory T cells in driver-gene-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer as well as its effect on the therapeutic efficacy and prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitors Y. Chen, S. Chen, Y. Li, X. Guo, Q. Liang, L. Yang, C. Lei International Journal of Radiation Research.2024; 22(2): 455. CrossRef
Glycosylation in cancer as a source of biomarkers Sara Khorami-Sarvestani, Samir M. Hanash, Johannes F. Fahrmann, Ricardo A. León-Letelier, Hiroyuki Katayama Expert Review of Proteomics.2024; 21(9-10): 345. CrossRef
Diagnostic value of joint detection of serum tumor markers in different pathological types of lung cancer W. Liu, D. Zang International Journal of Radiation Research.2024; 22(2): 315. CrossRef
Dual metal–organic-frameworks mediated resonance energy transfer for ultrasensitive electrochemiluminescence immunosensing Chun Wang, Gaoxing Cheng, Guixin Li, Jianbo Liu Microchimica Acta.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Advancements in colorectal cancer detection: The role of immuno‐positron emission tomography, immuno‐single‐photon emission computed tomography, and machine learning applications Surui Chen, Xiumin Shi, Shu Liu, Pei Pei, Kai Yang, Lin Hu Journal of Intelligent Medicine.2024; 1(1): 63. CrossRef
Emerging roles of long non-coding RNA FOXP4-AS1 in human cancers: From molecular biology to clinical application Jingjie Yang Heliyon.2024; 10(21): e39857. CrossRef
Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: Actual and Future Perspectives Horia-Dan Lișcu, Nicolae Verga, Dimitrie-Ionuț Atasiei, Dumitru-Cristinel Badiu, Adrian Vasile Dumitru, Flavia Ultimescu, Christopher Pavel, Roxana-Elena Stefan, Diandra-Carmen Manole, Andreea-Iuliana Ionescu International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(21): 11535. CrossRef
Grading carcinoembryonic antigen levels can enhance the effectiveness of prognostic stratification in patients with colorectal cancer: a single-centre retrospective study Hailun Xie, Lishuang Wei, Qiwen Wang, Shuangyi Tang, Jialiang Gan BMJ Open.2024; 14(10): e084219. CrossRef
Establishment and validation of a nomogram model for early diagnosis of gastric cancer: a large-scale cohort study Haiyu Wang, Yumin Ding, Shujing Zhao, Kaixu Li, Dehong Li Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Gasdermin D (GSDM D) as a Potential Diagnostic Biomarker in Bladder Cancer: New Perspectives in Detection Monika Gudowska-Sawczuk, Sara Pączek, Michał Olkowicz, Jacek Kudelski, Barbara Mroczko Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4213. CrossRef
The Past, Present, and Future of Biomarkers for the Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer Federica Vitale, Lorenzo Zileri Dal Verme, Mattia Paratore, Marcantonio Negri, Enrico Celestino Nista, Maria Elena Ainora, Giorgio Esposto, Irene Mignini, Raffaele Borriello, Linda Galasso, Sergio Alfieri, Antonio Gasbarrini, Maria Assunta Zocco, Alberto Biomedicines.2024; 12(12): 2840. CrossRef
Elevated CA19-9 within the normal range suggests poorer prognosis in stage II CRC: A retrospective analysis of a large sample in a single center Ruoxin Zhang, Fan Chen, Junyong Weng, Zilan Ye, Xinxiang Li Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.2024; 20(7): 2013. CrossRef
Serum cytokines in astrocytic brain tumors: a prospective study Tariq Ansari, Gautam Dutta, Arvind Kumar Srivastava, Anita Jagetia, Daljit Singh, Hukum Singh, Rohit Bharti, Anand Prakash, Anil Kumar British Journal of Neurosurgery.2023; 37(1): 35. CrossRef
Recent advancement in sensitive detection of carcinoembryonic antigen using nanomaterials based immunosensors Bazilah Awang Abd Manaf, Shyang Pei Hong, Mohammad Rizwan, Fareeha Arshad, Christopher Gwenin, Minhaz Uddin Ahmed Surfaces and Interfaces.2023; 36: 102596. CrossRef
A nomogram diagnostic prediction model of pancreatic metastases of small cell lung carcinoma based on clinical characteristics, radiological features and biomarkers Jian-Xia Xu, Jin-Bao Hu, Xiao-Yan Yang, Na Feng, Xiao-Shan Huang, Xiao-Zhong Zheng, Qin-Pan Rao, Yu-Guo Wei, Ri-Sheng Yu Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
The hidden potential of glycomarkers: Glycosylation studies in the service of cancer diagnosis and treatment Karolina Grzesik, Marcelina Janik, Dorota Hoja-Łukowicz Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer.2023; 1878(3): 188889. CrossRef
Transient Changes in Serum CEA, CA19-9, CRP, YKL-40, and IL-6 during Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival of Patients with Colorectal Cancer Kaisa Lehtomäki, Eetu Heervä, Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Harri Mustonen, Tapio Salminen, Heikki Joensuu, Kethe Hermunen, Mogens Karsbøl Boisen, Julia Sidenius Johansen, Caj Haglund, Pia Osterlund International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(7): 6753. CrossRef
Unexplained increase of serum carcinoembryonic antigen: don’t forget the thyroid! Filipe Miguel Montes de Jesus, Luca Giovanella Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM).2023; 61(10): e203. CrossRef
The Clinical Significance of Serum Free Light Chains in Bladder Cancer Monika Gudowska-Sawczuk, Jacek Kudelski, Michał Olkowicz, Grzegorz Młynarczyk, Piotr Chłosta, Barbara Mroczko Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(9): 3294. CrossRef
Target selection and clinical chimeric antigen receptor T cell activity against solid tumors Eric von Hofe, Yanping Yang, Moonsoo M. Jin iLABMED.2023; 1(1): 29. CrossRef
Sequence of colorectal and liver resection in patients with surgically-treatable stage IV colorectal cancer Calista Harbaugh, Aneel Damle Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2023; 34(3): 100969. CrossRef
CXC ELR-Positive Chemokines as Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer Patients Joanna Motyka, Aleksandra Kicman, Monika Kulesza, Sławomir Ławicki Cancers.2023; 15(12): 3118. CrossRef
Impedimetric aptasensor based on MOF based composite for measuring of carcinoembryonic antigen as a tumor biomarker Ping He, Qiang Zhang, Qiwei Liu Chemosphere.2023; 338: 139339. CrossRef
Two-dimensional substrate assisted SERS immunosensor for accurate detection of carcinoembryonic antigen Dechan Lu, Cairou Chen, PeiPei Xu, Ruiyun You, Zhenzhen Lu, Yudong Lu Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy.2023; 302: 123142. CrossRef
The Significance of CXCL1 and CXCR1 as Potential Biomarkers of Colorectal Cancer Marta Łukaszewicz-Zając, Monika Zajkowska, Sara Pączek, Agnieszka Kulczyńska-Przybik, Kamil Safiejko, Marcin Juchimiuk, Leszek Kozłowski, Barbara Mroczko Biomedicines.2023; 11(7): 1933. CrossRef
New luminescent hydrophilic iridium(III) nanoflower at low potential for electrochemiluminescence immunosensing Li Song, Guangrong Kuang, Gui Zhang, Jiang Guo, Yingzi Fu Chemical Engineering Journal.2023; 472: 144923. CrossRef
MOF-Based Biosensors for the Detection of Carcinoembryonic Antigen: A Concise Review May R. Ibrahim, Yaser E. Greish Molecules.2023; 28(16): 5970. CrossRef
Proteomics-Driven Biomarkers in Pancreatic Cancer Luís Ramalhete, Emanuel Vigia, Rúben Araújo, Hugo Pinto Marques Proteomes.2023; 11(3): 24. CrossRef
Clinicopathologic Significance of Heat Shock Protein 60 as a Survival Predictor in Colorectal Cancer Myunghee Kang, Soyeon Jeong, Jungsuk An, Sungjin Park, Seungyoon Nam, Kwang An Kwon, Debashis Sahoo, Pradipta Ghosh, Jung Ho Kim Cancers.2023; 15(16): 4052. CrossRef
Colorimetric immunoassay of carcinoembryonic antigen based on the glucose oxidase/MnO2 nanosheet cascade reaction with self-supplying oxygen Yuanzhi Yao, Jinhong Wang, Ziqi Wang, Shenghua Li, Hongliang Tan Analytical Methods.2023; 15(40): 5351. CrossRef
Combined effect of serum carcinoembryonic antigen and hepatic steatosis on new-onset ischemic heart disease among middle-aged and older Korean adults: a cohort study Ji Won Kwak, Yong Jae Lee, Byoungjin Park, Dong Hyuk Jung Frontiers in Nutrition.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Digestive cancer surgery in low-mid income countries: analysis of postoperative mortality and complications in a single-center study Hamza Sekkat, Hassan Agouzoul, Zineb Loudyi, Jaouad Naddouri, Jihane El Hamzaoui, Samira El Fakir, Mohammed Omari, Youness Bakali, Mouna Mhamdi Alaoui, Mohammed Raiss, Abdelmalek Hrora, Farid Sabbah Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Exploring the Role of Biomarkers Associated with Alveolar Damage and Dysfunction in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis—A Systematic Review Alexandra-Simona Zamfir, Mihai Lucian Zabara, Raluca Ioana Arcana, Tudor Andrei Cernomaz, Andreea Zabara-Antal, Marius Traian Dragoș Marcu, Antigona Trofor, Carmen Lăcrămioara Zamfir, Radu Crișan-Dabija Journal of Personalized Medicine.2023; 13(11): 1607. CrossRef
CEA vaccines Anchit Bhagat, Herbert K. Lyerly, Michael A. Morse, Zachary C. Hartman Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Biomarkers in Cancer Detection, Diagnosis, and Prognosis Sreyashi Das, Mohan Kumar Dey, Ram Devireddy, Manas Ranjan Gartia Sensors.2023; 24(1): 37. CrossRef
Disparities in post-operative surveillance testing for metastatic recurrence among colorectal cancer survivors Janeth I. Sanchez, Veena Shankaran, Joseph M. Unger, Margaret M. Madeleine, Noah Espinoza, Beti Thompson Journal of Cancer Survivorship.2022; 16(3): 638. CrossRef
T‐cell surface generation of dual bivalent, bispecific T‐cell engaging, RNA duplex cross‐linked antibodies (dbBiTERs) for re‐directed tumor cell lysis Maciej Kujawski, Lin Li, Harry Li, Paul J. Yazaki, Piotr Swiderski, John E. Shively Biotechnology Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Application of Proteomics in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Biomarker Investigations: A Review Christina Jane Vellan, Jaime Jacqueline Jayapalan, Boon-Koon Yoong, Azlina Abdul-Aziz, Sarni Mat-Junit, Perumal Subramanian International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(4): 2093. CrossRef
Biomarkers and Genetic Markers of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cholangiocarcinoma—What Do We Already Know Jacek Baj, Łukasz Bryliński, Filip Woliński, Michał Granat, Katarzyna Kostelecka, Piotr Duda, Jolanta Flieger, Grzegorz Teresiński, Grzegorz Buszewicz, Marzena Furtak-Niczyporuk, Piero Portincasa Cancers.2022; 14(6): 1493. CrossRef
Preparation of a disposable electrochemiluminescence sensor chip based on an MXene-loaded ruthenium luminescent agent and its application in the detection of carcinoembryonic antigens Weiwei Luo, Zhuoxin Ye, Pinyi Ma, Qiong Wu, Daqian Song The Analyst.2022; 147(9): 1986. CrossRef
Circulating Nucleic Acids as Novel Biomarkers for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Ryan McGowan, Áine Sally, Anthony McCabe, Brian Michael Moran, Karen Finn Cancers.2022; 14(8): 2027. CrossRef
Recent Advances in Nanomaterial‐based Optical Biosensors as Potential Point‐of‐Care Testing (PoCT) Probes in Carcinoembryonic Antigen Detection Siew Suan Ng, Hooi Ling Lee, Pandian Bothi Raja, Ruey‐an Doong Chemistry – An Asian Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Carbon Material Hybrid Construction on an Aptasensor for Monitoring Surgical Tumors Renyuan Ma, Subash C. B. Gopinath, Thangavel Lakshmipriya, Yeng Chen, Larisa Lvova Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry.2022; 2022: 1. CrossRef
CEA-regulated Oncolytic Virus Anticancer Therapy: A Promising Strategy
for Rare Solid Tumors Yuqi Yang, Shuhang Wang, Peiwen Ma, Qiyu Tang, Yandong Li, Yuan Fang, Qi Zhu, Wei Tao, Yan Zha, Ning Li Current Cancer Drug Targets.2022; 22(2): 126. CrossRef
Nomogram for Predicting Occult Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Before Surgery Zhixin Huang, Zhinuan Hong, Ling Chen, Mingqiang Kang Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Predicting the benefit of stereotactic body radiotherapy of colorectal cancer metastases Sara Lindberg, Eva Onjukka, Peter Wersäll, Caroline Staff, Rolf Lewensohn, Giuseppe Masucci, Karin Lindberg Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology.2022; 36: 91. CrossRef
Prognostic Value of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Changes Before and After Operation for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Zhinuan Hong, Zhixin Huang, Zhen Chen, Mingqiang Kang World Journal of Surgery.2022; 46(11): 2725. CrossRef
Toxic metals in cement induced hematological and DNA damage as well as carcinogenesis in occupationally-Exposed block-factory workers in Lagos, Nigeria Tajudeen Yahaya, Esther Oladele, Titilola Salisu, Esther Orji, Zafira Zakari, Umar Usman Liman, Clement Boniface Gomo, Mustapha Abdullahi Egyptian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences.2022; 9(1): 499. CrossRef
Identification of a Five-MiRNA Expression Assay to Aid Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis Matthew G. Davey, Gerard Feeney, Heidi Annuk, Maxwell Paganga, Emma Holian, Aoife J. Lowery, Michael J. Kerin, Nicola Miller Gastrointestinal Disorders.2022; 4(3): 190. CrossRef
Label-Free Immunosensor Based on Polyaniline-Loaded MXene and Gold-Decorated β-Cyclodextrin for Efficient Detection of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Qi Wang, Huaqian Xin, Zhou Wang Biosensors.2022; 12(8): 657. CrossRef
The tumor microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma and its targeting strategy by CAR-T cell immunotherapy Zhang Guizhen, Ji Guanchang, Liu Liwen, Wang Huifen, Ren Zhigang, Sun Ranran, Yu Zujiang Frontiers in Endocrinology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Increased Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Level Is Highly Associated with Low Skeletal Muscle Mass in Asymptomatic Adults: A Population-Based Study Chul-Hyun Park, Antonio Diaz Lizarraga, Yong-Taek Lee, Kyung-Jae Yoon, Tae-Kyung Yoo Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(17): 5009. CrossRef
Preoperative albumin–bilirubin score as a prognostic indicator in patients with stage III colon cancer Hyun Gu Lee, Seok-Byung Lim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Jin Cheon Kim Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
A Novel, Quick, and Reliable Smartphone-Based Method for Serum PSA Quantification: Original Design of a Portable Microfluidic Immunosensor-Based System Francisco Gabriel Ortega, Germán E. Gómez, Coral González-Martinez, Teresa Valero, José Expósito-Hernández, Ignacio Puche, Alba Rodriguez-Martinez, María José Serrano, José Antonio Lorente, Martín A. Fernández-Baldo Cancers.2022; 14(18): 4483. CrossRef
Microfluidics‐Based Urine Biopsy for Cancer Diagnosis: Recent Advances and Future Trends Yanping Wang, Yanfeng Gao, Yujun Song ChemMedChem.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma with a predominant HCC component: better survival and MRI-based prediction Yuyao Xiao, Xinde Zheng, Changwu Zhou, Peng Huang, Fei Wu, Chun Yang, Mengsu Zeng European Radiology.2022; 33(2): 1412. CrossRef
The recent advancements in the early detection of cancer biomarkers by DNAzyme-assisted aptasensors Hossein Kamali, Shiva Golmohammadzadeh, Hamed Zare, Rahim Nosrati, Mohammad Fereidouni, Hossein Safarpour Journal of Nanobiotechnology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
The Indicative Value of Serum Tumor Markers for Metastasis and Stage of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Chunyang Jiang, Mengyao Zhao, Shaohui Hou, Xiaoli Hu, Jinchao Huang, Hongci Wang, Changhao Ren, Xiaoying Pan, Ti Zhang, Shengnan Wu, Shun Zhang, Bingsheng Sun Cancers.2022; 14(20): 5064. CrossRef
Immunometabolic profiling of cervicovaginal lavages identifies key signatures associated with adenomyosis Georgia M. Lorentzen, Paweł Łaniewski, Haiyan Cui, Denise J. Roe, Jamal Mourad, Nichole D. Mahnert, Leslie V. Farland, Melissa M. Herbst-Kralovetz iScience.2022; 25(12): 105508. CrossRef
Detection of circulating KRAS mutant DNA in extracellular vesicles using droplet digital PCR in patients with colon cancer Jeesoo Choi, Ho Yeon Cho, Jeongseok Jeon, Kyung-A Kim, Yoon Dae Han, Joong Bae Ahn, Inbal Wortzel, David Lyden, Han Sang Kim Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Old and New Blood Markers in Human Colorectal Cancer Jean-Luc Wautier, Marie-Paule Wautier International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(21): 12968. CrossRef
Adnexal masses in patients with colorectal cancer Utku Akgor, Oguzhan Kuru, Burcu Soyak, Ali Can Gunes, Esra Uyanık, Murat Gultekin, Nejat Ozgul, Coskun Salman Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction.2021; 50(5): 101898. CrossRef
Identifying Novel Biomarkers Ready for Evaluation in Low-Prevalence Populations for the Early Detection of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review Natalia Calanzani, Paige E. Druce, Claudia Snudden, Kristi M. Milley, Rachel Boscott, Dawnya Behiyat, Smiji Saji, Javiera Martinez-Gutierrez, Jasmeen Oberoi, Garth Funston, Mike Messenger, Jon Emery, Fiona M. Walter Advances in Therapy.2021; 38(2): 793. CrossRef
Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen levels before and after curative surgery in colon cancer patients Hyun Ryung Kim, Jeong Il Joo, Sang Woo Lim, Bo Young Oh Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2021; 100(1): 33. CrossRef
Site-Specific N-Linked Glycosylation Analysis of Human Carcinoembryonic Antigen by Sheathless Capillary Electrophoresis–Tandem Mass Spectrometry Laura Pont, Valeriia Kuzyk, Fernando Benavente, Victoria Sanz-Nebot, Oleg A. Mayboroda, Manfred Wuhrer, Guinevere S. M. Lageveen-Kammeijer Journal of Proteome Research.2021; 20(3): 1666. CrossRef
A two-tiered targeted proteomics approach to identify pre-diagnostic biomarkers of colorectal cancer risk Sophia Harlid, Justin Harbs, Robin Myte, Carl Brunius, Marc J. Gunter, Richard Palmqvist, Xijia Liu, Bethany Van Guelpen Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
The Roadmap of Colorectal Cancer Screening Enea Ferlizza, Rossella Solmi, Michela Sgarzi, Luigi Ricciardiello, Mattia Lauriola Cancers.2021; 13(5): 1101. CrossRef
Optimizing the diagnosis and management of ductal prostate cancer Weranja Ranasinghe, Daniel D. Shapiro, Miao Zhang, Tharakeswara Bathala, Nora Navone, Timothy C. Thompson, Bradley Broom, Ana Aparicio, Shi-Ming Tu, Chad Tang, John W. Davis, Louis Pisters, Brian F. Chapin Nature Reviews Urology.2021; 18(6): 337. CrossRef
Identifying Novel Biomarkers Ready for Evaluation in Low-Prevalence Populations for the Early Detection of Lower Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Paige Druce, Natalia Calanzani, Claudia Snudden, Kristi Milley, Rachel Boscott, Dawnya Behiyat, Javiera Martinez-Gutierrez, Smiji Saji, Jasmeen Oberoi, Garth Funston, Mike Messenger, Fiona M. Walter, Jon Emery Advances in Therapy.2021; 38(6): 3032. CrossRef
Metachronous pulmonary and pancreatic metastases arising from sigmoid colon cancer: A case report Jian Yang, Yu-Chen Tang, Ni Yin, Wei Liu, Zhi-Fei Cao, Xi Li, Xiao Zou, Zi-Xiang Zhang, Jian Zhou World Journal of Clinical Cases.2021; 9(15): 3668. CrossRef
Biomarkers in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: Are we closer to finding the golden ticket? Robert S O'Neill, Alina Stoita World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(26): 4045. CrossRef
Unique structural features of the adenylate kinase hCINAP/AK6 and its multifaceted functions in carcinogenesis and tumor progression Ruidan Xu, Yongfeng Yang, Xiaofeng Zheng FEBS Letters.2021; 595(16): 2071. CrossRef
Has the COVID-19 Pandemic Caused Upshifting in Colorectal Cancer Stage? Ji Ha Lim, Woo Yong Lee, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Yong Beom Cho, Jung Wook Huh, Yoon Ah Park, Jung Kyong Shin Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(4): 253. CrossRef
SERS liquid biopsy: An emerging tool for medical diagnosis Vlad Moisoiu, Stefania D. Iancu, Andrei Stefancu, Tudor Moisoiu, Barbara Pardini, Mihnea P. Dragomir, Nicolae Crisan, Lucretia Avram, Dana Crisan, Iulia Andras, Daniela Fodor, Loredana F. Leopold, Carmen Socaciu, Zoltán Bálint, Ciprian Tomuleasa, Florin E Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces.2021; 208: 112064. CrossRef
Risk-Predictive and Diagnostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer; a Systematic Review of Studies Using Pre-Diagnostic Blood Samples Collected in Prospective Cohorts and Screening Settings Sophia Harlid, Marc J. Gunter, Bethany Van Guelpen Cancers.2021; 13(17): 4406. CrossRef
The Level of Preoperative Plasma KRAS Mutations and CEA Predict Survival of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases Jiri Polivka, Jindra Windrichova, Martin Pesta, Katerina Houfkova, Hana Rezackova, Tereza Macanova, Ondrej Vycital, Radek Kucera, David Slouka, Ondrej Topolcan Cancers.2020; 12(9): 2434. CrossRef
Thionine-doped nanometer-sized silica conjugated with phenylboronic acid: An innovative recognition/signal element for voltammetric aptasensing of colorectal cancer-related carcinoembryonic antigen Liangjie Chi, Chao Xu, Shuyuan Li, Xiangyu Wang, Dianping Tang, Fangqin Xue Analytica Chimica Acta.2020; 1136: 91. CrossRef
Molecularly Imprinted Polymers in Biological Applications Zahra El-Schich, Yuecheng Zhang, Marek Feith, Sarah Beyer, Louise Sternbæk, Lars Ohlsson, Maria Stollenwerk, Anette Gjörloff Wingren BioTechniques.2020; 69(6): 407. CrossRef
Predictive Value of Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Symptomatic Patients without Colorectal Cancer: A Post-Hoc Analysis within the COLONPREDICT Cohort Noel Pin-Vieito, María José Iglesias, David Remedios, Victoria Álvarez-Sánchez, Fernando Fernández-Bañares, Jaume Boadas, Eva Martínez-Bauer, Rafael Campo, Luis Bujanda, Ángel Ferrández, Virginia Piñol, Daniel Rodríguez-Alcalde, Martín Menéndez-Rodríguez, Diagnostics.2020; 10(12): 1036. CrossRef
Purpose The impact of postoperative complications on long-term oncologic outcome after radical colorectal cancer surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the risk factors and oncologic outcomes of surgery-related postoperative complication groups.
Methods From January 2010 to December 2010, 310 patients experienced surgery-related postoperative complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery. These stage I–III patients were classified into 2 subgroups, minor (grades I, II) and major (grades III, IV) complication groups, according to extended Clavien-Dindo classification system criteria. Clinicopathologic differences between the 2 groups were analyzed to identify risk factors for major complications. The diseasefree survival rates of surgery-related postoperative complication groups were also compared.
Results Minor and major complication groups were stratified with 194 patients (62.6%) and 116 patients (37.4%), respectively. The risk factors influencing the major complication group were pathologic N category and operative method. The prognostic factors associated with disease-free survival were preoperative perforation, perineural invasion, tumor budding, and receiving neoadjuvant therapy. With a median follow-up period of 72.2 months, the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 84.4% in the minor group and 78.5% in the major group, but there was no statistical significance between the minor and major groups (P = 0.392).
Conclusion Advanced cancer and open surgery were identified as risk factors for increased surgery-related major complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery. However, severity of postoperative complications did not affect disease-free survival from colorectal cancer.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Oncologic impact of technical difficulties during the early experience with laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: long-term follow-up results of a prospective cohort study Hong-min Ahn, Tae Gyun Lee, Hye-Rim Shin, Jeehye Lee, In Jun Yang, Jung Wook Suh, Heung-Kwon Oh, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang Current Problems in Surgery.2025; 63: 101694. CrossRef
Impact of Preoperative and Intraoperative Factors on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A 10-Year Retrospective Study Lucian Flavius Herlo, Ioana Golu, Alexandra Herlo, Claudia Raluca Balasa Virzob, Ionescu Alin, Stela Iurciuc, Ionut Eduard Iordache, Luana Alexandrescu, Doina Ecaterina Tofolean, Raluca Dumache Diseases.2025; 13(1): 16. CrossRef
Surgical management of mucinous adenocarcinoma arising in perianal fistula: A case series Saeed Derakhshani, Milad Karimian Ghadim, Abolfazl Salari, Mohammadreza Ghahari Surgery Open Science.2025; 26: 1. CrossRef
Organ/space surgical site infection and long-term outcomes of rectal cancer surgery: retrospective population-based cohort study Carlota Matallana, Paula Manchon-Walsh, Eloy Espín, Marta Pascual, Sebastiano Biondo, Marta Jiménez-Toscano, Josep Maria Borràs, Josep M Badia, Enric Limón, Luisa Aliste, Rebeca Font, Miguel Pera BJS Open.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Accelerated enhanced recovery after colon cancer surgery with discharge within one day after surgery: a systematic review Misha A. T. Sier, Anke H. C. Gielen, Thaís T. T. Tweed, Noémi C. van Nie, Tim Lubbers, Jan H. M. B. Stoot BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Risk Factors of Postoperative Complication and Hospital Mortality after Colorectal Perforation Surgery Kensuke Kudou, Shuhei Kajiwara, Takashi Motomura, Takafumi Yukaya, Tomonori Nakanoko, Yosuke Kuroda, Masahiro Okamoto, Tadashi Koga, Yo-Ichi Yamashita Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2024; 8(2): 118. CrossRef
Predictive value of POSSUM scoring system for postoperative complications and mortality in elderly patients with colorectal cancer Qiang Li, Yingjun Lu Technology and Health Care.2024; 32(6): 4653. CrossRef
Postoperative Complications Result in Poor Oncological Outcomes: What Is the Evidence? Anjana Wajekar, Sohan Lal Solanki, Juan Cata, Vijaya Gottumukkala Current Oncology.2024; 31(8): 4632. CrossRef
The role of robotic-assisted surgery in the management of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis Chenxiong Zhang, Hao Tan, Han Xu, Jiaming Ding International Journal of Surgery.2024; 110(10): 6282. CrossRef
Effect of postoperative complications on 5-year survival following laparoscopic surgery for resectable colorectal cancer: a retrospective study Jae Eun Lee, Kyeong Eui Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek, Sung Uk Bae International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery in Rectal Cancer: Analysis of Medium-Term Oncological Outcomes Jing-jing Li, Zhi-bo Zhang, Shi-yun Xu, Cheng-ren Zhang, Xiong-fei Yang, Yao-xing Duan Surgical Innovation.2023; 30(1): 36. CrossRef
Do postoperative infectious complications really affect long‐term survival in colorectal cancer surgery? A multicenter retrospective cohort study Akihisa Matsuda, Hiroshi Maruyama, Shinji Akagi, Toru Inoue, Kenichiro Uemura, Minako Kobayashi, Hisanori Shiomi, Manabu Watanabe, Hiroki Arai, Yutaka Kojima, Yusuke Mizuuchi, Hajime Yokomizo, Yuji Toiyama, Toru Miyake, Yasuyuki Yokoyama, Kei Ishimaru, Sh Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2023; 7(1): 110. CrossRef
International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment Audrius Dulskas, Philip F. Caushaj, Domas Grigoravicius, Liu Zheng, Richard Fortunato, Joseph W. Nunoo-Mensah, Narimantas E. Samalavicius Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(4): 307. CrossRef
Effect of serum lactate dehydrogenase-to-albumin ratio (LAR) on the short-term outcomes and long-term prognosis of colorectal cancer after radical surgery Xin-Peng Shu, Ying-Chun Xiang, Fei Liu, Yong Cheng, Wei Zhang, Dong Peng BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Modified Clavien–Dindo–sink classification system for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis Ndéye F. Guissé, Joseph D. Stone, Lukas G. Keil, Tracey P. Bastrom, Mark A. Erickson, Burt Yaszay, Patrick J. Cahill, Stefan Parent, Peter G. Gabos, Peter O. Newton, Michael P. Glotzbecker, Michael P. Kelly, Joshua M. Pahys, Nicholas D. Fletcher Spine Deformity.2022; 10(1): 87. CrossRef
Surgical site infection after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer is associated with compromised long-term oncological outcome Nana Sugamata, Takashi Okuyama, Emiko Takeshita, Haruka Oi, Yuhei Hakozaki, Shunya Miyazaki, Musashi Takada, Takashi Mitsui, Takuji Noro, Hideyuki Yoshitomi, Masatoshi Oya World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Does Preoperative Waiting Time Affect the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer Patients? A Retrospective Study from the West of China Xiao-Yu Liu, Zi-Wei Li, Bing Kang, Yu-Xi Cheng, Wei Tao, Bin Zhang, Hua Zhang, Zheng-Qiang Wei, Dong Peng, Antonio Giovanni Solimando Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 2022: 1. CrossRef
Surgical safety in the COVID-19 era: present and future considerations Young Il Kim, In Ja Park Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 102(6): 295. CrossRef
Current status and role of robotic approach in patients with low-lying rectal cancer Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(1): 1. CrossRef
Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer Sung Uk Bae Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 577. CrossRef
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, and Current Management Seung Mi Yeo, Gyung Mo Son The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Current Status and Future of Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer-An English Version Sung Uk Bae Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 221. CrossRef
A propensity score-matched analysis of advanced energy devices and conventional monopolar device for colorectal cancer surgery: comparison of clinical and oncologic outcomes Woo Jin Song, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(5): 290. CrossRef
Purpose The aim of this study was to assess oncological outcomes of postoperative radiotherapy plus chemotherapy (CRT) versus chemotherapy alone (CTx) in stage II or III upper rectal cancer patients who underwent curative surgery.
Methods We retrospectively reviewed 263 consecutive patients with pathologic stage II or III upper rectal cancer who underwent primary curative resection with postoperative CRT or CTx from January 2008 to December 2014 at Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital. Multivariate and propensity score matching analyses were used to reduce selection bias.
Results Median follow-up was 48.1 months for the entire cohort and 53.5 months for the matched cohort. In subgroup analysis of the propensity score matched cohort, the 3-year local recurrence-free survival was 94.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.8%–100%) in the CRT group and 90.1% (95% CI, 82.8%–97.9%) in the CTx group (P = 0.370). No significant difference in disease-free survival was observed according to treatment type. On multivariate analysis, circumferential resection margin involvement (hazard ratio [HR], 2.386; 95% CI, 1.190–7.599; P = 0.032), N stage (HR, 6.262; 95% CI, 1.843–21.278, P = 0.003), and T stage (HR, 5.896, 95% CI, 1.298–6.780, P = 0.021) were identified as independent risk factors for local recurrence of tumors of the upper rectum.
Conclusion Omission of radiotherapy in an adjuvant treatment setting may not jeopardize oncologic outcomes in stages II and III upper rectal cancer.
Citations
Citations to this article as recorded by
Efficacies of radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision or other types of surgery: an updated meta-analysis Wenshu Wang, Runyuan Zhao, Xi Liang, Manjun Liu, Haiyan Bai, Jianli Ge, Binxi Yao, Zheng Zhi, Jianming He Oncology Reviews.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Rectal Cancer 2023 Supplement Sean J. Langenfeld, Bradley R. Davis, Jon D. Vogel, Jennifer S. Davids, Larissa K.F. Temple, Kyle G. Cologne, Samantha Hendren, Steven Hunt, Julio Garcia Aguilar, Daniel L. Feingold, Amy L. Lightner, Ian M. Paquette Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2024; 67(1): 18. CrossRef
Is radiotherapy necessary for upper rectal cancer underwent curative resection? A retrospective study of 363 patients Zhiwei Ma, Jumei Zhou, Ke Liu, Sisi Chen, Qinghui Wu, Lin Peng, Wei Zhao, Suyu Zhu Radiation Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Which Definition of Upper Rectal Cancer Is Optimal in Selecting Stage II or III Rectal Cancer Patients to Avoid Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation? Xian Hua Gao, Bai Zhi Zhai, Juan Li, Jean Luc Tshibangu Kabemba, Hai Feng Gong, Chen Guang Bai, Ming Lu Liu, Shao Ting Zhang, Fu Shen, Lian Jie Liu, Wei Zhang Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub] CrossRef
Role of adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis Xin-qi Shi, Jing-yu Zhang, Hua Tian, Ling-na Tang, Ai-lin Li Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B.2020; 21(7): 549. CrossRef