Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
77 "Recurrence"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Review
Colorectal cancer
The role of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in advanced rectal cancer: a review of current evidence and outcomes
Gyu-Seog Choi, Hye Jin Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):363-374.   Published online August 30, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00521.0074
  • 4,490 View
  • 423 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPNs) in rectal cancer significantly impact the prognosis and treatment strategies. Western practices emphasize neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), whereas Eastern approaches often rely on LPN dissection (LPND). This review examines the evolving role of LPND in the context of modern treatments, including total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), and the impact of CRT on the management of clinically suspicious LPNs. We comprehensively reviewed the key literature comparing the outcomes of LPND versus preoperative CRT for rectal cancer, focusing on recent advancements and ongoing debates. Key studies, including the JCOG0212 trial and recent multicenter trials, were analyzed to assess the efficacy of LPND, particularly in conjunction with preoperative CRT or TNT. Current evidence indicates that LPND can reduce local recurrence rates compared to total mesorectal excision alone in patients not receiving radiation therapy. However, the benefit of LPND in the context of neoadjuvant CRT is influenced by the size and pretreatment characteristics of LPNs. While CRT can effectively control smaller metastatic LPNs, larger or clinically suspicious LPNs may require LPND for optimal outcomes. Advances in surgical techniques, such as robotic-assisted LPND, offer potential benefits but also present challenges and complications. The role of TNT in controlling metastatic LPNs and improving patient outcomes is emerging but remains underexplored. The decision to perform LPND should be individualized based on patient-specific factors, including LPN size, response to neoadjuvant treatment, and surgeon expertise. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment protocols and further evaluating the role of TNT in managing metastatic LPNs.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Who is a candidate at the initial presentation? Prediction of positive lateral lymph node and survival after dissection
    Y. Lee
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The oncologic benefits of lateral lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant therapy – local control or survival?
    T. Sammour
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Locally‐Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Cohort Study Comparing Perioperative Morbidity and Short‐Term Oncological Outcomes
    Joseph Mathew, Yogesh Kisan Bansod, Nishant Yadav, Janesh Murugan, Kovvuru Bhaskar Reddy, Mufaddal Kazi, Ashwin DeSouza, Avanish Saklani
    Cancer Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • From the Editor: Uniting expertise, a new era of global collaboration in coloproctology
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 285.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Translational/basic research
Exfoliate cancer cell analysis in rectal cancer surgery: comparison of laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision, a pilot study
Kiho You, Jung-Ah Hwang, Dae Kyung Sohn, Dong Woon Lee, Sung Sil Park, Kyung Su Han, Chang Won Hong, Bun Kim, Byung Chang Kim, Sung Chan Park, Jae Hwan Oh
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(6):502-512.   Published online December 26, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00479.0068
  • 2,070 View
  • 102 Download
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is currently the standard treatment for rectal cancer. However, its limitations include complications and incomplete total mesorectal resection (TME) due to anatomical features and technical difficulties. Transanal TME (TaTME) has been practiced since 2010 to improve this, but there is a risk of local recurrence and intra-abdominal contamination. We aimed to analyze samples obtained through lavage to compare laparoscopic TME (LapTME) and TaTME.
Methods
From June 2020 to January 2021, 20 patients with rectal cancer undergoing MIS were consecutively and prospectively recruited. Samples were collected at the start of surgery, immediately after TME, and after irrigation. The samples were analyzed for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 20 (CK20) through a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The primary outcome was to compare the detected amounts of CEA and CK20 immediately after TME between the surgical methods.
Results
Among the 20 patients, 13 underwent LapTME and 7 underwent TaTME. Tumor location was lower in TaTME (7.3 cm vs. 4.6 cm, P=0.012), and negative mesorectal fascia (MRF) was more in LapTME (76.9% vs. 28.6%, P=0.044). CEA and CK20 levels were high in 3 patients (42.9%) only in TaTME. There was 1 case of T4 with incomplete purse-string suture and 1 case of positive MRF with dissection failure. All patients were followed up for an average of 32.5 months without local recurrence.
Conclusion
CEA and CK20 levels were high only in TaTME and were related to tumor factors or intraoperative events. However, whether the detection amount is clinically related to local recurrence remains unclear.
Colorectal cancer
Partial mesorectal excision can be a primary option for middle rectal cancer: a propensity score–matched retrospective analysis
Ee Jin Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(3):253-267.   Published online March 31, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00689.0098
  • 3,234 View
  • 195 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Although partial mesorectal excision (PME) and total mesorectal excision (TME) is primarily indicated for the upper and lower rectal cancer, respectively, few studies have evaluated whether PME or TME is more optimal for middle rectal cancer.
Methods
This study included 671 patients with middle and upper rectal cancer who underwent robot-assisted PME or TME. The 2 groups were optimized by propensity score matching of sex, age, clinical stage, tumor location, and neoadjuvant treatment.
Results
Complete mesorectal excision was achieved in 617 of 671 patients (92.0%), without showing a difference between the PME and TME groups. Local recurrence rate (5.3% vs. 4.3%, P>0.999) and systemic recurrence rate (8.5% vs. 16.0%, P=0.181) also did not differ between the 2 groups, in patients with middle and upper rectal cancer. The 5-year disease-free survival (81.4% vs. 74.0%, P=0.537) and overall survival (88.0% vs. 81.1%, P=0.847) also did not differ between the PME and TME groups, confined to middle rectal cancer. Moreover, 5-year recurrence and survival rates were not affected by distal resection margins of 2 cm (P=0.112) to 4 cm (P>0.999), regardless of pathological stages. Postoperative complication rate was higher in the TME than in the PME group (21.4% vs. 14.5%, P=0.027). Incontinence was independently associated with TME (odds ratio [OR], 2.009; 95% confidence interval, 1.015–3.975; P=0.045), along with older age (OR, 4.366, P<0.001) and prolonged operation time (OR, 2.196; P=0.500).
Conclusion
PME can be primarily recommended for patients with middle rectal cancer with lower margin of >5 cm from the anal verge.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Review of definition and treatment of upper rectal cancer
    Elias Karam, Fabien Fredon, Yassine Eid, Olivier Muller, Marie Besson, Nicolas Michot, Urs Giger-Pabst, Arnaud Alves, Mehdi Ouaissi
    Surgical Oncology.2024; 57: 102145.     CrossRef
  • Tumour-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and functional outcomes
    Fabio Carbone, Wanda Petz, Simona Borin, Emilio Bertani, Stefano de Pascale, Maria Giulia Zampino, Uberto Fumagalli Romario
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 49(11): 107069.     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
Recurrence following transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a monocentric retrospective series of technically difficult cases
Jonathan Frigault, Geneviève Morin, Sébastien Drolet, Philippe Bouchard, Alexandre Bouchard, Thanh-Quan Philips Ngo, François Letarte
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(4):332-341.   Published online November 14, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00178.0025
  • 3,208 View
  • 61 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) has been proposed to overcome surgical difficulties encountered during rectal resection, especially for patients having high body mass index or low rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate oncologic outcomes following TaTME.
Methods
This retrospective study included all consecutive patients with rectal cancer who had a TaTME from 2013 to 2019. The main outcome was the incidence of locoregional recurrence by the end of the follow-up period.
Results
Among a total of 81 patients, 96.3% were male, and their mean age was 63±9 years. The mean body mass index was 30.3±5.7 kg/m2, and the median distance from tumor to anal verge was 5.0 cm (interquartile range [IQR], 4.0–6.0 cm). Most patients had a low anterior resection performed (n=80, 98.8%) with a diverting ileostomy (n=64, 79.0%). Distal and circumferential resection margins were positive in 2.5% and 6.2% of patients, respectively. Total mesorectal excision was complete or near complete in 95.1% of patients. A successful resection was achieved in 72 patients (88.9%). After a median follow-up of 27.5 months (IQR, 16.7–48.1 months), 4 patients (4.9%) experienced locoregional recurrence. Anastomotic leaks were observed in 21 patients (25.9%). At the end of the follow-up, 69 patients (85.2%) were stoma-free.
Conclusion
TaTME was associated with acceptable oncological outcomes, including low locoregional recurrence rates in selected patients with low rectal cancer. Although associated with a high incidence of postoperative morbidities, the use of TaTME enabled a high rate of successful sphincter-saving procedures in selected patients who posed a technical challenge.
Anorectal benign disease
Garg scoring system to predict long-term healing in cryptoglandular anal fistulas: a prospective validation study
Sushil Dawka, Vipul D. Yagnik, Baljit Kaur, Geetha R. Menon, Pankaj Garg
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(5):490-497.   Published online October 11, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00346.0049
  • 2,892 View
  • 111 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Complex anal fistulas can recur after clinical healing, even after a long interval which leads to significant anxiety. Also, ascertaining the efficacy of any new treatment procedure becomes difficult and takes several years. We prospectively analyzed the validity of Garg scoring system (GSS) to predict long-term fistula healing.
Methods
In patients operated for cryptoglandular anal fistulas, magnetic resonance imaging was performed preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively to assess fistula healing. Scores as per the GSS were calculated for each patient at 3 months postoperatively and correlated with long-term healing to check the accuracy of the scoring system.
Results
Fifty-seven patients were enrolled, but 50 were finally included (7 were excluded). These 50 patients (age, 41.2±12.4 years; 46 men) were followed up for 12 to 20 months (median, 17 months). Forty-seven patients (94.0%) had complex fistulas, 28 (56.0%) had recurrent fistulas, 48 (96.0%) had multiple tracts, 20 (40.0%) had horseshoe tracts, 15 (32.0%) had associated abscesses, 5 (10.0%) were suprasphincteric, and 8 (16.0%) were supralevator fistulas. The GSS could accurately predict long-term healing (high positive predictive value, 31 of 31 [100%]) but was not very accurate in predicting nonhealing (negative predictive value, 15 of 19 [78.9%]). The sensitivity in predicting healing was 31 of 35 (88.6%).
Conclusion
GSS accurately predicts long-term fistula with a high positive predictive value (100%) but is less accurate in predicting nonhealing. This scoring system can help allay anxiety in patients and facilitate the early validation of innovative procedures for anal fistulas.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Recent Advances in the Understanding and Management of Anal Fistula from India
    Vipul D. Yagnik, Sandeep Kumar, Anshul Thakur, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Sushil Dawka, Pankaj Garg
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2024; 86(6): 1105.     CrossRef
  • Rectovaginal Fistulas Not Involving the Rectovaginal Septum Should Be Treated Like Anal Fistulas: A New Concept and Proposal for a Reclassification of Rectovaginal Fistulas
    Pankaj Garg, Laxmikant Ladukar, Vipul Yagnik, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Gurleen Kaur
    Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology.2024; Volume 17: 97.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of complex anal fistula
    Pankaj Garg, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Vipul D. Yagnik, G. Mahak
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 321.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of outcome in cryptoglandular anal fistula according to magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review
    Alireza Teymouri, Amir Keshvari, Ali Ashjaei, Seyed Mohsen Ahmadi Tafti, Faeze Salahshour, Faezeh Khorasanizadeh, Amirhosein Naseri
    Health Science Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pankaj Garg: A Community Doctor to a Master Innovator to a Global Icon
    David N. Armstrong, Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska, Vincent de Parades, Francesco Litta, Manuel Limbert, Khaw C. W. James
    Global Journal of Medical, Pharmaceutical, and Biomedical Update.2023; 18: 16.     CrossRef
Incidence of anal fistula after pyogenic perianal abscess drainage in Kingdom of Bahrain
Zahra Abdulla Isa Yusuf Hasan, Bayan Mohamed, Rawaa AlSayegh, Raed AlMarzooq
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(1):27-31.   Published online August 9, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.00962.0137
  • 5,884 View
  • 187 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Perianal fistula is one of the most common anorectal diseases in adult patients, especially men. A relationship between pyogenic perianal abscess and fistula formation is established in multiple domains. This is the first exploration of such association among patients in the country as no related study has been published in Bahrain. We expect this study to be a foundation for future protocols and evidence-based practice.
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted in Salmaniya Medical Complex of Bahrain. A total of 109 patients with a diagnosis of anal abscess were included between 2015 and 2018. Data were collected from the electronic files database used in Salmaniya Medical Complex (iSeha) as well as phone calls to the patients. Collected data were analyzed using statistical software.
Results
The most predominant presentation of perianal abscess was pain. Over 50% of abscesses were classified as perianal (56.9%) and among those, left-sided abscesses were more common, followed by right-, posterior-, and anterior-sited, respectively. No recurrence of abscess was recorded among 80% of patients. A fistula developed following abscess drainage in 33.9% of patients. Most fistulas (37.8%) were diagnosed within 6 months or less from abscess drainage. Posterior fistulas were the most common, followed by anterior and left-sided fistulas.
Conclusion
The incidence of anal fistula in Bahrain after perianal abscess was 33.9%. Most of the patients who developed a fistula following pyogenic abscess drainage were males and above the age of 40 years. The most common site for fistula was posterior.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk factors for perianal abscess recurrence after incision and drainage: a review of the literature
    Kheira Gabsi
    International Surgery Journal.2025; 12(2): 255.     CrossRef
  • Anal Cryptoglandular Suppuration
    Oladapo Akinmoladun, Quinton M. Hatch
    Surgical Clinics of North America.2024; 104(3): 491.     CrossRef
  • Proposal for a new classification of anorectal abscesses based on clinical characteristics and postoperative recurrence
    Shan-Zhong Chen, Kui-Jun Sun, Yi-Fan Gu, Hong-Yuan Zhao, Dong Wang, Yun-Fang Shi, Ren-Jie Shi
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(11): 3425.     CrossRef
  • Research Progress on Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Perianal Deep Space Abscess
    永罡 秦
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2023; 13(01): 180.     CrossRef
Case Report
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer
Late Recurrence in a Rectal Cancer Patient Who Underwent Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Local Excision: A Case Report
Jin Soo Han, Seok-Byung Lim, Jin-hong Park, Yong Sang Hong
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(Suppl 1):S24-S27.   Published online July 27, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.00073.0010
  • 3,078 View
  • 54 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Some patients who have undergone preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) following surgery have been diagnosed with late recurrence more than 5 years after treatment, raising questions about the possible benefit extending surveillance beyond the recommended 5 years. In 2011, a 71-year-old male patient was diagnosed with T3N+ low-lying rectal cancer located 3 cm from the anal verge before undergoing long-course preoperative CRT. After CRT, the patient was reexamined and diagnosed with ycT1–2N0 lesion, so local excision (LE) was performed. The patient underwent intensive surveillance for up to 5 years, and no evidence of recurrence was found. At 74 months after surgery, the patient was hospitalized for a hematochezia, and local recurrence at the excision site and peritoneal seeding nodules were identified. Considering the late recurrence in this patient, it might be necessary to long-term follow-up beyond 5 years in patients with preoperative CRT followed by LE.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Coccygodynia in a Long-Term Cancer Survivor Diagnosed with Metastatic Cancer: A Case Report
    Jung Hyun Park, Seong Jin Park, Dulee Kim, Jae Hoo Park, So Young Kwon
    Medicina.2024; 60(8): 1365.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Malignant disease,Prognosis
Recurrence after endoscopic resection of small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a retrospective cohort study
Sukit Pattarajierapan, Supakij Khomvilai
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(3):216-222.   Published online July 20, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00017.0002
  • 6,370 View
  • 188 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
According to the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus guidelines, rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) up to 10 mm in size and without poor prognostic factors could be safely removed with endoscopic resection, suggesting omitting surveillance colonoscopy after complete resection. However, the benefit of surveillance colonoscopy is still unknown. In this study, we aimed to report the outcomes after endoscopic resection of small rectal NETs using our surveillance protocol.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent endoscopic resection for rectal NETs sized up to 10 mm from January 2013 to December 2019 at our center. We excluded patients without surveillance colonoscopy and those lost to follow-up. We strictly performed surveillance colonoscopy 1 year after endoscopic resection, and every 2 to 3 years thereafter. The primary outcomes were tumor recurrence and occurrence of metachronous tumors during followup.
Results
Of the 54 patients who underwent endoscopic resection for rectal NETs during the study period, 46 were enrolled in this study. The complete resection rates by endoscopic mucosal resection, precutting endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection were 92.3% (12 of 13), 100% (21 of 21), and 100% (12 of 12), respectively. There was no local or distant recurrence during the median follow-up of 39 months. However, we found that 8.7% (4 of 46) of patients developed metachronous NETs. All metachronous lesions were treated with precutting endoscopic mucosal resection.
Conclusion
Surveillance colonoscopy is reasonable after endoscopic resection of small rectal NETs for timely detection and treatment of metachronous lesions. However, larger collaborative studies are needed to influence the guidelines.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison of the efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery in the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 2 cm
    Rui Jin, Xiaoyin Bai, Tianming Xu, Xi Wu, Qipu Wang, Jingnan Li
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current status of the role of endoscopy in evaluation and management of gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Zaheer Nabi, Sundeep Lakhtakia, D. Nageshwar Reddy
    Indian Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 42(2): 158.     CrossRef
Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer
Comparison of the oncological outcomes of stenting as a bridge to surgery and surgery alone in stages II to III obstructive colorectal cancer: a retrospective study
Hiroaki Uehara, Toshiyuki Yamazaki, Akira Iwaya, Hitoshi Kameyama, Masaru Komatsu, Motoharu Hirai
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(3):235-243.   Published online July 13, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.01067.0152
  • 5,451 View
  • 206 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 8 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
We evaluated the oncological outcomes of bridge to surgery (BTS) using stent compared with surgery alone for obstructive colorectal cancer.
Methods
Consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for stages II to III obstructive colorectal cancer at our institution from January 2009 to March 2020, were registered retrospectively and divided into 43 patients in the BTS group and 65 patients in the surgery alone group. We compared the surgical and oncological outcomes between the 2 groups.
Results
Stent-related perforation did not occur. One patient in whom the stent placement was unsuccessful underwent emergency surgery with poor decompression (clinical success rate, 97.7%). The pathological characteristics were not significantly different between the groups. The following surgical outcomes in the BTS group were superior to those in the surgery alone group; nonemergency surgery (P<0.001), surgical approach (P=0.006), and length of hospital stay (P=0.020). The median follow-up time was 44.9 months (range, 1.1–126.5 months). The 3-year relapse-free survival rates were 68.4% and 58.2% (P=0.411), and the overall survival rates were 78.3% and 88.2% (P=0.255) in the surgery alone and BTS groups, respectively. The 3-year locoregional recurrence rates were 10.2% and 8.0% (P=0.948), and distant metastatic recurrence rates were 13.3% and 30.4% (P=0.035) in the surgery alone and BTS groups, respectively.
Conclusion
This study revealed that BTS with stent may be associated with a higher frequency of distant metastatic recurrence. Stent for stages II to III obstructive colorectal cancer potentially worsens oncological outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Complete Obstruction, a Real Risk Factor: A Comprehensive Study on Obstruction in Stage IIA Colon Cancer With Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Soo Young Oh, Chan Wook Kim, Seonok Kim, Min Hyun Kim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2024; 23(2): 135.     CrossRef
  • Can we use colon stenting in accelerated recovery programs for surgical treatment colon cancer complicated by obstructive intestinal obstruction? A literature review
    Saday A. Aliyev, Emil S. Aliyev
    Russian Journal of Oncology.2024; 29(2): 130.     CrossRef
  • Oncologic impact of colonic stents for obstructive left-sided colon cancer
    Hideyuki Suzuki, Shingo Tsujinaka, Yoshihiro Sato, Tomoya Miura, Chikashi Shibata
    World Journal of Clinical Oncology.2023; 14(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • 5-year oncological outcomes in left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: stent as bridge to surgery
    Noura S Alhassan, Sulaiman A AlShammari, Razan N AlRabah, Amirah M AlZahrani, Maha-Hamadien Abdulla, Thamer A Bin Traiki, Ahmad M Zubaidi, Omar A Al-Obeed, Khayal A Alkhayal
    BMC Gastroenterology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
  • Do Laparoscopic Approaches Ensure Oncological Safety and Prognosis for Serosa-Exposed Colon Cancer? A Comparative Study against the Open Approach
    Ji-Hyun Seo, In-Ja Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(21): 5211.     CrossRef
  • Recurrence Patterns and Risk Factors after Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: Insights for Postoperative Surveillance Strategies
    Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim, Ye Ryung Park, Eun Hae Cho, Jeong Min Choo, Ji-Seon Kim, Se-Jin Baek, Jung-Myun Kwak
    Cancers.2023; 15(24): 5791.     CrossRef
  • Colonic stent for bridge to surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: A review of the literature after 2020
    Margherita Binetti, Augusto Lauro, Valeria Tonini
    World Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 13(12): 957.     CrossRef
Benign proctology,Complication,Biomarker & risk factor
Longer prolapsed rectum length increases recurrence risk after Delorme’s procedure
Taro Tanabe, Emi Yamaguchi, Takuya Nakada, Risa Nishio, Kinya Okamoto, Tetsuo Yamana
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(4):314-318.   Published online July 13, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.01032.0147
  • 4,223 View
  • 152 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Risk factors for recurrence of rectal prolapse after surgery remain unclear. Delorme’s procedure is often selected for relatively small-sized rectal prolapse, but there are few reports discussing the association between prolapsed rectum length and prolapse recurrence after Delorme’s procedure. We hypothesized that patients with longer rectal prolapses are at a higher risk of recurrence after Delorme’s procedure.
Methods
The study population comprised patients with rectal prolapse who underwent Delorme’s procedure between January 2014 and December 2019 at Tokyo Yamate Medical Center. We extracted data on patient age, sex, body mass index, previous history of anal surgery, previous history of surgery for rectal prolapse, and length of prolapse, to identify risk factors for prolapse recurrence.
Results
Altogether, 96 patients were eligible for analysis. The median length of the prolapsed rectum was 3.0 cm (range, 1.0–6.6 cm). Twenty-four patients (25.0%) experienced recurrence after Delorme’s procedure after a median of 7.5 months (interquartile range, 3.2–20.9 months). Multivariate analysis revealed that longer prolapsed rectum length increased the risk of recurrence after Delorme’s procedure (hazard ratio, 6.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.83–21.50; P<0.001).
Conclusion
The length of the prolapsed rectum should be measured before Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse, because length is associated with a risk of recurrence after the surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Surgical approaches for complete rectal prolapse
    Long Wu, Huan Wu, Song Mu, Xiao-Yun Li, Yun-Huan Zhen, Hai-Yang Li
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Tratamiento quirúrgico del prolapso rectal completo del adulto
    C. Korkmaz, G. Meurette
    EMC - Técnicas Quirúrgicas - Aparato Digestivo.2024; 40(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Trattamento chirurgico del prolasso rettale completo dell’adulto
    C. Korkmaz, G. Meurette
    EMC - Tecniche Chirurgiche Addominale.2024; 30(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • The Predictive Risk Factor of Postoperative Recurrence Following Altemeier's and Delorme's Procedures for Full-thickness Rectal Prolapse: An Analysis of 127 Japanese Patients in a Single Institution
    Yasuyuki Miura, Kimihiko Funahashi, Akiharu Kurihara, Satoru Kagami, Takayuki Suzuki, Kimihiko Yoshida, Mitsunori Ushigome, Tomoaki Kaneko
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2024; 8(3): 171.     CrossRef
  • Modified Altemeier Procedure as Management for Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse in a Young Healthy Male Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Leenah Abdulgader, Ebtesam Al-Najjar, Bayan Khasawneh, Abdullah Esmail
    Medicina.2024; 60(11): 1872.     CrossRef
  • Traitement chirurgical du prolapsus rectal complet de l’adulte
    C. Korkmaz, G. Meurette
    EMC - Techniques chirurgicales - Appareil digestif.2023; 40(4): 1.     CrossRef
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy
Beware of Early Relapse in Rectal Cancer Patients Treated With Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
Seul Gi Oh, In Ja Park, Ji-hyun Seo, Young Il Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Jong Lyul Lee, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(6):382-389.   Published online June 17, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.06.11
  • 4,326 View
  • 103 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Recurrence patterns in rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) are needed to evaluate for establishing tailored surveillance protocol.
Methods
This study included 2,215 patients with locally-advanced mid and low rectal cancer treated with radical resection between January 2005 and December 2012. Recurrence was evaluated according to receipt of PCRT; PCRT group (n = 1,258) and no-PCRT group (n = 957). Early recurrence occurred within 1 year of surgery and late recurrence after 3 years. The median follow-up duration was 65.7 ± 29 months.
Results
The overall recurrence rate was similar between the PCRT and no-PCRT group (25.8% vs. 24.9%, P = 0.622). The most common initial recurrence site was the lungs in both groups (50.6% vs. 49.6%, P = 0.864), followed by the liver, which was more common in the no-PCRT group (22.5% vs. 33.6%, P = 0.004). Most of the recurrence occurred within 3 years after surgery in both groups (85.3% vs. 85.8%, P = 0.862). Early recurrence was more common in the PCRT group than in the no-PCRT group (43.1% vs. 32.4%, P = 0.020). Recurrence within the first 6 months after surgery was significantly higher in the PCRT group than in the no-PCRT group (18.8% vs. 7.6%, P = 0.003). Lung (n = 27, 44.3%) and liver (n = 22, 36.1%) were the frequent the first relapsed site within 6 months after surgery in PCRT group.
Conclusion
Early recurrence within the first 1 year after surgery was more common in patients treated with PCRT. This difference would be considered for surveillance protocols and need to be evaluated in further studies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Watch and wait strategies for rectal cancer: A systematic review
    In Ja Park
    Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(2): 91.     CrossRef
  • Update on Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
    Chan Wook Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The watch-and-wait strategy versus radical resection for rectal cancer patients with a good response (≤ycT2) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(6): 350.     CrossRef
  • Optimal Postoperative Surveillance Strategies for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study
    Min-Young Park, In-Ja Park, Hyo-Seon Ryu, Jay Jung, Min-Sung Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang-Sik Yu, Jin-Cheon Kim
    Cancers.2021; 13(14): 3502.     CrossRef
  • Comparison between Local Excision and Radical Resection for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer in ypT0-1 Patients: An Analysis of the Clinicopathological Factors and Survival Rates
    Soo Young Oh, In Ja Park, Young IL Kim, Jong-Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Cancers.2021; 13(19): 4823.     CrossRef
  • Shifting Treatment Strategies to Prevent Early Relapse of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Eun Jung Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(6): 357.     CrossRef
Case Report
Benign proctology
Combined Fistulotomy and Contralateral Anal Internal Sphincterotomy for Recurrent and Complex Anal Fistula to Prevent Recurrence
Adeodatus Yuda Handaya, Aditya Rifqi Fauzi
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(2):122-127.   Published online March 17, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.11.19
  • 5,293 View
  • 156 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
The ideal intervention in the treatment of perianal fistula prevents the onset of infection to speed healing and prevent fistula recurrence while maintaining the function of the anal sphincter. Currently, there is no consensus on the best recommended surgical technique for perianal fistula management. Several studies have shown that fistulotomy was an easy and safe procedure for treatment of perianal fistula. Lateral internal sphincterotomy is the usual procedure performed on an anal fissure to decrease the anal sphincter tone. This study reports a combination of fistulotomy and contralateral internal sphincterotomy procedures for recurrent and complex perianal fistula to prevent recurrence. Here, we report 5 cases of recurrent and complex perianal fistula. The combination of fistulotomy and contralateral internal sphincterotomy is a relatively easy and safe procedure for complex perianal fistulae. In our cases, we found neither recurrence nor postoperative anal incontinence.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Modified anal sphincter suspension improves anal function in patients with anal fistula
    Peng Chen
    American Journal of Translational Research.2024; 16(9): 4858.     CrossRef
  • Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistulous Tract vs Endorectal Advancement Flap for High-Type Fistula in Ano: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Pankaj Kumar, Siddhant Sarthak, Pradeep K Singh, Tushar S Mishra, Prakash K Sasmal
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2023; 236(1): 27.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of loose combined cutting seton and traditional cutting seton for high anal fistula: a meta-analysis
    Yi SUN, Chunqiang WANG, Tianye HUANG, Xuebing WANG
    Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
Review
A Review of the Role of Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Clinical Practice
Claire Hall, Louise Clarke, Atanu Pal, Pamela Buchwald, Tim Eglinton, Chris Wakeman, Frank Frizelle
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(6):294-305.   Published online December 31, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.11.13
  • 14,537 View
  • 463 Download
  • 139 Web of Science
  • 131 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is not normally produced in significant quantities after birth but is elevated in colorectal cancer. The aim of this review was to define the current role of CEA and how best to investigate patients with elevated CEA levels. A systematic review of CEA was performed, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were identified from PubMed, Cochrane library, and controlled trials registers. We identified 2,712 papers of which 34 were relevant. Analysis of these papers found higher preoperative CEA levels were associated with advanced or metastatic disease and thus poorer prognosis. Postoperatively, failure of CEA to return to normal was found to be indicative of residual or recurrent disease. However, measurement of CEA levels alone was not sufficient to improve survival rates. Two algorithms are proposed to guide investigation of patients with elevated CEA: one for patients with elevated CEA after CRC resection, and another for patients with de novo elevated CEA. CEA measurement has an important role in the investigation, management and follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A fluorescent platform integrated with a “one-pot” nicking endonuclease signal amplification and magnetic separation for simultaneous detection of tumor markers
    Miaomiao Liu, Lie Liu, Mengsi Du, Qilong Li, Shiqi Wu, Shengxiang Su, Ningge Jian, Yongjun Wu, Yilin Wang
    Talanta.2025; 282: 127011.     CrossRef
  • CAR-T cell therapy for breast cancer: Current status and future perspective
    Giuseppe Buono, Monica Capozzi, Roberta Caputo, Vincenzo Di Lauro, Daniela Cianniello, Michela Piezzo, Stefania Cocco, Claudia Martinelli, Annarita Verrazzo, Margherita Tafuro, Claudia Calderaio, Alessandra Calabrese, Francesco Nuzzo, Martina Pagliuca, Mi
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2025; 133: 102868.     CrossRef
  • A promising role of noble metal NPs@MOFs in chondrosarcoma management
    Ziheng Huang, Keyue Tian, Yiyuan Xue, Feng Luo
    Nanoscale.2025; 17(6): 2961.     CrossRef
  • Electrochemical biosensor based on composite of gold nanoparticle/reduced-graphene oxide/graphitic carbon nitride and a caprolactone polymer for highly sensitive detection of CEA
    Yunpeng Li, Xia Wang, Xinling Wang, Zhe Qin, Chong Li, Jing Yang, Mengmeng Cao
    Bioelectrochemistry.2025; 163: 108897.     CrossRef
  • Advances and challenges of metal-organic frameworks in the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer
    Min Ye, Yingqi Lu, Peiyan Zou, Luyi Zhou, Govindhan Maduraiveeran, Yong Huang, Yanqiong Peng
    Materials Today Chemistry.2025; 43: 102517.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen as a Predictor of 5-Year Survival in Rectal Cancer: Proposing a New Prognostic Cutoff
    Amir Keshvari, Seyed Mohsen Ahmadi Tafti, Mohammad Reza Keramati, Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli, Alireza Kazemeini, Behnam Behboudi, Reza Akbari Asbagh, Anahita Mirzasadeghi
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Klinefelter Syndrome Sans Malignancy with Unusually Elevated Levels of CEA: A Case Report
    Xinxin Wo, Xiaoyan Yu, Lingling Miao, Yushan Mao, Keke Tang
    Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity.2025; Volume 18: 233.     CrossRef
  • Nanomaterial-based biosensors for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) detection: principles, applications, and perspectives: A review
    Siyuan Zhao, Yuxi Zhang, Yafang Wu, Yinglin Wang, Dezhi Li, Qing Liu
    Microchemical Journal.2025; 210: 112992.     CrossRef
  • Advancing Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer: A Brief Review of Emerging Adoptive Cell Therapies
    Deepak Sherpally, Ashish Manne
    Cancers.2025; 17(4): 589.     CrossRef
  • Assessing the diagnostic value of oncological biomarkers for identifying primary malignancies in skeletal metastatic disease
    Sanna Matilainen, Hanna Liikanen, Riitta Lassila, Minna K. Laitinen
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2025; 51(6): 109688.     CrossRef
  • A novel photocleavable amino-modified graphene for covalent purification of N-glycans from hepatocellular carcinoma patients’ serum for potential biomarkers discovery
    Xuyuan Chao, Shengjie Yang, Baoying Zhang, Xin Zang, Jingyi Zhang, Xizi Liu, Lu Chen, Lu Qi, Xiaofeng Xue, Han Hu, Xinghe Wang
    Cancer Nanotechnology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • On‐Paper Enzyme‐Linked and Metal‐Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Low‐Cost Decentralized Testing of Carcinoembryonic Antigen
    Electra Mermiga, Varvara Pagkali, Dionysios Soulis, Christos Kokkinos, Anastasios Economou
    Analysis & Sensing.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Circulating Biomarkers of Thyroid Cancer: An Appraisal
    Marta Codrich, Alessia Biasotto, Federica D’Aurizio
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(5): 1582.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic role of postoperative persistence of ctDNA molecular signature after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: Preliminary results from a prospective study
    Roberto Montalti, Francesco Pepe, Gianluca Cassese, Gianluca Russo, Umberto Malapelle, Chiara Carlomagno, Mariano Cesare Giglio, Giacinto Falco, Mariantonietta Alagia, Giuseppe De Simone, Karen Geboes, Giancarlo Troncone, Roberto Ivan Troisi, Gianluca Rom
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2025; 51(6): 109706.     CrossRef
  • Fecal bacterial biomarkers and blood biochemical indicators as potential key factors in the development of colorectal cancer
    Ping Cai, Qingzhen Yang, Jiaqi Lu, Xiaoyu Dai, Jinbo Xiong, Nicholas Chia
    mSystems.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • CA19-9, CEA and PIVKA-Ⅱ as a novel panel of serum markers for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer
    Meifang Wang, Hongying Bu, Weijia Luo, Xi Zeng, Guodong Chen, Yingchun He, Deliang Cao
    Clinical Biochemistry.2025; : 110902.     CrossRef
  • Carbon dots: Review of recent applications and perspectives in bio-sensing and biomarker detection
    Xeniya Terzapulo, Aiym Kassenova, Alissa Loskutova, Rostislav Bukasov
    Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research.2025; 47: 100771.     CrossRef
  • Determination of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) by surface plasmon resonance-enhanced total internal reflection ellipsometry (SPRe-TIRE)
    Aslı Erkal-Aytemur, Samet Şahin, Zafer Üstündağ, İbrahim Ender Mülazımoğlu, Mustafa Oguzhan Caglayan
    Instrumentation Science & Technology.2024; 52(2): 203.     CrossRef
  • Peptide absent sequences emerging in human cancers
    Georgios Christos Tsiatsianis, Candace S.Y. Chan, Ioannis Mouratidis, Nikol Chantzi, Anna Maria Tsiatsiani, Nelson S. Yee, Apostolos Zaravinos, Verena Kantere, Ilias Georgakopoulos-Soares
    European Journal of Cancer.2024; 196: 113421.     CrossRef
  • Electrochemical nanobiosensors for the detection of cancer biomarkers in real samples: Trends and challenges
    Fethi Achi, Aisha M. Attar, Abdellatif Ait Lahcen
    TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry.2024; 170: 117423.     CrossRef
  • Biosensor-Based Nanodiagnosis of Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA): an Approach to Classification and Precise Detection of Cancer Biomarker
    Maryam Hariri, Vahid Alivirdiloo, Nastaran Safavi Ardabili, Sarah Gholami, Sajjad Masoumi, Mohammad Reza Mehraban, Mahsa Alem, Reza Shah Hosseini, Ahmad Mobed, Farhood Ghazi, Iraj Alipourfard
    BioNanoScience.2024; 14(1): 429.     CrossRef
  • Circulating Tumour Cells in the Prediction of Bone Metastasis
    Siu-Wai Choi, Aria Kaiyuan Sun, Jason Pui-Yin Cheung, Jemmi Ching-Ying Ho
    Cancers.2024; 16(2): 252.     CrossRef
  • Next-Generation CEA-CAR-NK-92 Cells against Solid Tumors: Overcoming Tumor Microenvironment Challenges in Colorectal Cancer
    Alexander Sebastian Franzén, Abdelhadi Boulifa, Clarissa Radecke, Sebastian Stintzing, Martin J. Raftery, Gabriele Pecher
    Cancers.2024; 16(2): 388.     CrossRef
  • Normal CEA Levels After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Cytoreduction with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemoperfusion Predict Improved Survival from Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases
    Michael M. Wach, Geoffrey Nunns, Ahmed Hamed, Joshua Derby, Mark Jelinek, Curtis Tatsuoka, Matthew P. Holtzman, Amer H. Zureikat, David L. Bartlett, Steven A. Ahrendt, James F. Pingpank, M. Haroon A. Choudry, Melanie Ongchin
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(4): 2391.     CrossRef
  • Electrochemically Synthesized MIP Sensors: Applications in Healthcare Diagnostics
    Akinrinade George Ayankojo, Jekaterina Reut, Vitali Syritski
    Biosensors.2024; 14(2): 71.     CrossRef
  • Optical fiber sensing probe for detecting a carcinoembryonic antigen using a composite sensitive film of PAN nanofiber membrane and gold nanomembrane
    Jinze Li, Xin Liu, Hao Sun, Jiawei Xi, Chen Chang, Li Deng, Yanxin Yang, Xiang Li
    Optics Express.2024; 32(11): 20024.     CrossRef
  • DNAzyme-based ultrasensitive immunoassay: Recent advances and emerging trends
    Meng Wang, Zhe Liu, Chang Liu, Wanghong He, Dui Qin, Minli You
    Biosensors and Bioelectronics.2024; 251: 116122.     CrossRef
  • Predictive modeling algorithms for liver metastasis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review of the current literature
    Isaac Seow-En, Ye Xin Koh, Yun Zhao, Boon Hwee Ang, Ivan En-Howe Tan, Aik Yong Chok, Emile John Kwong Wei Tan, Marianne Kit Har Au
    Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.2024; 28(1): 14.     CrossRef
  • Realizing the label-free sensitive detection of carcinoembryogenic antigen (CEA) in blood serum via a MNC-decorated flexible immunosensor
    Daisy Mehta, Sukhjot Kaur, Tharamani C. Nagaiah
    Analytical Methods.2024; 16(10): 1473.     CrossRef
  • Postbiotic butyrate: role and its effects for being a potential drug and biomarker to pancreatic cancer
    Abinaya Elango, Vineeta Debbie Nesam, Padmaja Sukumar, Infancia Lawrence, Arunkumar Radhakrishnan
    Archives of Microbiology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Classifying Raman Spectra of Colon Cells Based on Machine Learning Algorithms
    Maria Lasalvia, Crescenzio Gallo, Vito Capozzi, Giuseppe Perna
    Photonics.2024; 11(3): 275.     CrossRef
  • Electrochemical immunosensing of tumor markers
    Venkata Narayana Palakollu, Y. Veera Manohara Reddy, Mehdihasan I. Shekh, S.V. Prabhakar Vattikuti, Jaesool Shim, Rajshekhar Karpoormath
    Clinica Chimica Acta.2024; 557: 117882.     CrossRef
  • Improving CEA detection Sensitivity: Carboxyfluorescein-Loaded liposomes in aptamer sandwich assay
    Mohamed Aimene Benariba, Kanza Hannachi, Yuting Zhang, Xiaoli Wang, Nandi Zhou
    Microchemical Journal.2024; 200: 110463.     CrossRef
  • Targeted Biodegradable Near-Infrared Fluorescent Nanoparticles for Colorectal Cancer Imaging
    Seock-Jin Chung, Kay Hadrick, Md Nafiujjaman, Ehsanul Hoque Apu, Meghan L. Hill, Md Nurunnabi, Christopher H. Contag, Taeho Kim
    ACS Applied Bio Materials.2024; 7(12): 7861.     CrossRef
  • Use of tumor markers in distinguishing lung adenocarcinoma-associated malignant pleural effusion from tuberculous pleural effusion
    Ling Ai, Wenjun Wang, Jingyuan Li, Ting Ye, Yuying Li
    The American Journal of the Medical Sciences.2024; 368(2): 136.     CrossRef
  • Carcinoembryonic antigen in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of focal liver lesions
    Osman Nuri Dilek, Dilara İrem Arslan Kahraman, Gökhan Kahraman
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(4): 999.     CrossRef
  • Complex Presentation of Lung Cancer with Obstructive Jaundice
    Ruxandra Oprita, Bogdan Oprita, Ioana Adriana Serban, Lidia Aurelia Stefan, Ciprian Mihai Neacsu, Alice Elena Diaconu, Valentin Enache
    Reports.2024; 7(2): 30.     CrossRef
  • A simplified lateral flow immunosensor for the assay of carcinoembryonic antigen in low-resource settings
    Ioanna Tsogka, Electra Mermiga, Varvara Pagkali, Christos Kokkinos, Anastasios Economou
    Analytical Methods.2024; 16(18): 2921.     CrossRef
  • Relevance of glyco-biomakers and glycan profiles in cancer stem cells
    Rohit Pujari, Shiv Kumar Dubey
    Glycobiology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic prediction model of colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers
    Yu-Hang Diao, Si-Qi Rao, Xin-Peng Shu, Yong Cheng, Can Tan, Li-Juan Wang, Dong Peng
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(5): 1344.     CrossRef
  • Label-free electrochemical biosensor based on dual amplification of gold nanoparticles and polycaprolactones for CEA detection
    Xia Wang, Zhe Qin, Fei Zhang, Chong Li, Xianxian Yuan, Jing Yang, Huaixia Yang
    Talanta.2024; 278: 126468.     CrossRef
  • Biotin-functionalized nanoparticles: an overview of recent trends in cancer detection
    Sonia Fathi-karkan, Saman Sargazi, Shirin Shojaei, Bahareh Farasati Far, Shekoufeh Mirinejad, Marco Cordani, Arezoo Khosravi, Ali Zarrabi, Saeid Ghavami
    Nanoscale.2024; 16(27): 12750.     CrossRef
  • Mortality rate and predictors of colorectal cancer patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zewdu Bishaw Aynalem, Abebaw Bires Adal, Temesgien Fentahun Ayele, Gashaw Melkie Bayeh, Almaw Genet Yeshiwas, Tadesse Miretie Dessie, Tilahun Degu Tsega
    BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Opto-electrochemical transducers for molecular sensing utilizing nanozyme-based sensing technologies
    Indrani Nandi, Vinay Patel, Rohit Srivastava, Pranjal Chandra
    Microchemical Journal.2024; 205: 111360.     CrossRef
  • Five-Segment THz Refractive Index Metamaterial Biosensor With Perfect Absorption for Carcinoembryonic Antigen Measurement
    Hamid Bahador
    IEEE Sensors Journal.2024; 24(16): 25715.     CrossRef
  • Near-infrared light-enhanced colorimetric signal amplification strategy for tumor marker detection based on MoS2/CuO/Au nanocomposite
    Jiawang Xiang, Bing Zhang, Yuan Yuan, Zhihuan Zhao, Jianying Lin, Jing Li
    Microchimica Acta.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development and validation of a novel combinational index of liquid biopsy biomarker for longitudinal lung cancer patient management
    Min-Yi Liao, Yun-Jie Hao, Ching-Shan Luo, Ching-Mei Chen, Po-Hao Feng, Hsin-Yu Yang, Da-Jeng Yao, Kang-Yun Lee, Fan-Gang Tseng
    The Journal of Liquid Biopsy.2024; 6: 100167.     CrossRef
  • The AC010247.2/miR-125b-5p axis triggers the malignant progression of acute myelocytic leukemia by IL-6R
    Fang Xie, Jialu Xu, Lina Yan, Xia Xiao, Liang Liu
    Heliyon.2024; 10(18): e37715.     CrossRef
  • Biofilm mediated integrin activation and directing acceleration of colorectal cancer
    Vaijayanthi Saravanan, Vinoj Gopalakrishnan, Maria Infant Majula Shifani Mahendran, Rajan Vaithianathan, Sowmya Srinivasan, Vinoth Boopathy, SriKrishna Krishnamurthy
    APMIS.2024; 132(10): 688.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the clinical efficacy of dienogest and drospirone/ethinyl estradiol in the treatment of ovarian endometriosis cysts
    Qian Xiao, Liwei Hong, Chun Li, Sijie Hong, Yunsong Li, Dingding Yu, Hongli Liu
    Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders.2024; 16(3-4): 134.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances in surface plasmon resonance for the detection of ovarian cancer biomarkers: a thorough review
    Shahnam Valizadeh Shahbazlou, Somayeh Vandghanooni, Bahareh Dabirmanesh, Morteza Eskandani, Sadegh Hasannia
    Microchimica Acta.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Expression of regulatory T cells in driver-gene-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer as well as its effect on the therapeutic efficacy and prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitors
    Y. Chen, S. Chen, Y. Li, X. Guo, Q. Liang, L. Yang, C. Lei
    International Journal of Radiation Research.2024; 22(2): 455.     CrossRef
  • Glycosylation in cancer as a source of biomarkers
    Sara Khorami-Sarvestani, Samir M. Hanash, Johannes F. Fahrmann, Ricardo A. León-Letelier, Hiroyuki Katayama
    Expert Review of Proteomics.2024; 21(9-10): 345.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic value of joint detection of serum tumor markers in different pathological types of lung cancer
    W. Liu, D. Zang
    International Journal of Radiation Research.2024; 22(2): 315.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA 19-9 levels in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer treated with a self-expandable metallic stent and curative surgery
    Ryuichiro Sato, Masaya Oikawa, Tetsuya Kakita, Tomoya Abe, Naoya Akazawa, Haruka Okano, Kei Ito, Takashi Tsuchiya
    Surgery Today.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dual metal–organic-frameworks mediated resonance energy transfer for ultrasensitive electrochemiluminescence immunosensing
    Chun Wang, Gaoxing Cheng, Guixin Li, Jianbo Liu
    Microchimica Acta.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advancements in colorectal cancer detection: The role of immuno‐positron emission tomography, immuno‐single‐photon emission computed tomography, and machine learning applications
    Surui Chen, Xiumin Shi, Shu Liu, Pei Pei, Kai Yang, Lin Hu
    Journal of Intelligent Medicine.2024; 1(1): 63.     CrossRef
  • Emerging roles of long non-coding RNA FOXP4-AS1 in human cancers: From molecular biology to clinical application
    Jingjie Yang
    Heliyon.2024; 10(21): e39857.     CrossRef
  • Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: Actual and Future Perspectives
    Horia-Dan Lișcu, Nicolae Verga, Dimitrie-Ionuț Atasiei, Dumitru-Cristinel Badiu, Adrian Vasile Dumitru, Flavia Ultimescu, Christopher Pavel, Roxana-Elena Stefan, Diandra-Carmen Manole, Andreea-Iuliana Ionescu
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(21): 11535.     CrossRef
  • Grading carcinoembryonic antigen levels can enhance the effectiveness of prognostic stratification in patients with colorectal cancer: a single-centre retrospective study
    Hailun Xie, Lishuang Wei, Qiwen Wang, Shuangyi Tang, Jialiang Gan
    BMJ Open.2024; 14(10): e084219.     CrossRef
  • Establishment and validation of a nomogram model for early diagnosis of gastric cancer: a large-scale cohort study
    Haiyu Wang, Yumin Ding, Shujing Zhao, Kaixu Li, Dehong Li
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Gasdermin D (GSDM D) as a Potential Diagnostic Biomarker in Bladder Cancer: New Perspectives in Detection
    Monika Gudowska-Sawczuk, Sara Pączek, Michał Olkowicz, Jacek Kudelski, Barbara Mroczko
    Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4213.     CrossRef
  • The Past, Present, and Future of Biomarkers for the Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer
    Federica Vitale, Lorenzo Zileri Dal Verme, Mattia Paratore, Marcantonio Negri, Enrico Celestino Nista, Maria Elena Ainora, Giorgio Esposto, Irene Mignini, Raffaele Borriello, Linda Galasso, Sergio Alfieri, Antonio Gasbarrini, Maria Assunta Zocco, Alberto
    Biomedicines.2024; 12(12): 2840.     CrossRef
  • Elevated CA19-9 within the normal range suggests poorer prognosis in stage II CRC: A retrospective analysis of a large sample in a single center
    Ruoxin Zhang, Fan Chen, Junyong Weng, Zilan Ye, Xinxiang Li
    Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.2024; 20(7): 2013.     CrossRef
  • Serum cytokines in astrocytic brain tumors: a prospective study
    Tariq Ansari, Gautam Dutta, Arvind Kumar Srivastava, Anita Jagetia, Daljit Singh, Hukum Singh, Rohit Bharti, Anand Prakash, Anil Kumar
    British Journal of Neurosurgery.2023; 37(1): 35.     CrossRef
  • Recent advancement in sensitive detection of carcinoembryonic antigen using nanomaterials based immunosensors
    Bazilah Awang Abd Manaf, Shyang Pei Hong, Mohammad Rizwan, Fareeha Arshad, Christopher Gwenin, Minhaz Uddin Ahmed
    Surfaces and Interfaces.2023; 36: 102596.     CrossRef
  • A nomogram diagnostic prediction model of pancreatic metastases of small cell lung carcinoma based on clinical characteristics, radiological features and biomarkers
    Jian-Xia Xu, Jin-Bao Hu, Xiao-Yan Yang, Na Feng, Xiao-Shan Huang, Xiao-Zhong Zheng, Qin-Pan Rao, Yu-Guo Wei, Ri-Sheng Yu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The hidden potential of glycomarkers: Glycosylation studies in the service of cancer diagnosis and treatment
    Karolina Grzesik, Marcelina Janik, Dorota Hoja-Łukowicz
    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer.2023; 1878(3): 188889.     CrossRef
  • Transient Changes in Serum CEA, CA19-9, CRP, YKL-40, and IL-6 during Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival of Patients with Colorectal Cancer
    Kaisa Lehtomäki, Eetu Heervä, Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Harri Mustonen, Tapio Salminen, Heikki Joensuu, Kethe Hermunen, Mogens Karsbøl Boisen, Julia Sidenius Johansen, Caj Haglund, Pia Osterlund
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(7): 6753.     CrossRef
  • Unexplained increase of serum carcinoembryonic antigen: don’t forget the thyroid!
    Filipe Miguel Montes de Jesus, Luca Giovanella
    Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM).2023; 61(10): e203.     CrossRef
  • The Clinical Significance of Serum Free Light Chains in Bladder Cancer
    Monika Gudowska-Sawczuk, Jacek Kudelski, Michał Olkowicz, Grzegorz Młynarczyk, Piotr Chłosta, Barbara Mroczko
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(9): 3294.     CrossRef
  • Target selection and clinical chimeric antigen receptor T cell activity against solid tumors
    Eric von Hofe, Yanping Yang, Moonsoo M. Jin
    iLABMED.2023; 1(1): 29.     CrossRef
  • Sequence of colorectal and liver resection in patients with surgically-treatable stage IV colorectal cancer
    Calista Harbaugh, Aneel Damle
    Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2023; 34(3): 100969.     CrossRef
  • CXC ELR-Positive Chemokines as Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer Patients
    Joanna Motyka, Aleksandra Kicman, Monika Kulesza, Sławomir Ławicki
    Cancers.2023; 15(12): 3118.     CrossRef
  • Impedimetric aptasensor based on MOF based composite for measuring of carcinoembryonic antigen as a tumor biomarker
    Ping He, Qiang Zhang, Qiwei Liu
    Chemosphere.2023; 338: 139339.     CrossRef
  • Two-dimensional substrate assisted SERS immunosensor for accurate detection of carcinoembryonic antigen
    Dechan Lu, Cairou Chen, PeiPei Xu, Ruiyun You, Zhenzhen Lu, Yudong Lu
    Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy.2023; 302: 123142.     CrossRef
  • The Significance of CXCL1 and CXCR1 as Potential Biomarkers of Colorectal Cancer
    Marta Łukaszewicz-Zając, Monika Zajkowska, Sara Pączek, Agnieszka Kulczyńska-Przybik, Kamil Safiejko, Marcin Juchimiuk, Leszek Kozłowski, Barbara Mroczko
    Biomedicines.2023; 11(7): 1933.     CrossRef
  • New luminescent hydrophilic iridium(III) nanoflower at low potential for electrochemiluminescence immunosensing
    Li Song, Guangrong Kuang, Gui Zhang, Jiang Guo, Yingzi Fu
    Chemical Engineering Journal.2023; 472: 144923.     CrossRef
  • MOF-Based Biosensors for the Detection of Carcinoembryonic Antigen: A Concise Review
    May R. Ibrahim, Yaser E. Greish
    Molecules.2023; 28(16): 5970.     CrossRef
  • Proteomics-Driven Biomarkers in Pancreatic Cancer
    Luís Ramalhete, Emanuel Vigia, Rúben Araújo, Hugo Pinto Marques
    Proteomes.2023; 11(3): 24.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathologic Significance of Heat Shock Protein 60 as a Survival Predictor in Colorectal Cancer
    Myunghee Kang, Soyeon Jeong, Jungsuk An, Sungjin Park, Seungyoon Nam, Kwang An Kwon, Debashis Sahoo, Pradipta Ghosh, Jung Ho Kim
    Cancers.2023; 15(16): 4052.     CrossRef
  • Colorimetric immunoassay of carcinoembryonic antigen based on the glucose oxidase/MnO2 nanosheet cascade reaction with self-supplying oxygen
    Yuanzhi Yao, Jinhong Wang, Ziqi Wang, Shenghua Li, Hongliang Tan
    Analytical Methods.2023; 15(40): 5351.     CrossRef
  • Combined effect of serum carcinoembryonic antigen and hepatic steatosis on new-onset ischemic heart disease among middle-aged and older Korean adults: a cohort study
    Ji Won Kwak, Yong Jae Lee, Byoungjin Park, Dong Hyuk Jung
    Frontiers in Nutrition.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Digestive cancer surgery in low-mid income countries: analysis of postoperative mortality and complications in a single-center study
    Hamza Sekkat, Hassan Agouzoul, Zineb Loudyi, Jaouad Naddouri, Jihane El Hamzaoui, Samira El Fakir, Mohammed Omari, Youness Bakali, Mouna Mhamdi Alaoui, Mohammed Raiss, Abdelmalek Hrora, Farid Sabbah
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Exploring the Role of Biomarkers Associated with Alveolar Damage and Dysfunction in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis—A Systematic Review
    Alexandra-Simona Zamfir, Mihai Lucian Zabara, Raluca Ioana Arcana, Tudor Andrei Cernomaz, Andreea Zabara-Antal, Marius Traian Dragoș Marcu, Antigona Trofor, Carmen Lăcrămioara Zamfir, Radu Crișan-Dabija
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2023; 13(11): 1607.     CrossRef
  • CEA vaccines
    Anchit Bhagat, Herbert K. Lyerly, Michael A. Morse, Zachary C. Hartman
    Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Biomarkers in Cancer Detection, Diagnosis, and Prognosis
    Sreyashi Das, Mohan Kumar Dey, Ram Devireddy, Manas Ranjan Gartia
    Sensors.2023; 24(1): 37.     CrossRef
  • Disparities in post-operative surveillance testing for metastatic recurrence among colorectal cancer survivors
    Janeth I. Sanchez, Veena Shankaran, Joseph M. Unger, Margaret M. Madeleine, Noah Espinoza, Beti Thompson
    Journal of Cancer Survivorship.2022; 16(3): 638.     CrossRef
  • T‐cell surface generation of dual bivalent, bispecific T‐cell engaging, RNA duplex cross‐linked antibodies (dbBiTERs) for re‐directed tumor cell lysis
    Maciej Kujawski, Lin Li, Harry Li, Paul J. Yazaki, Piotr Swiderski, John E. Shively
    Biotechnology Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Application of Proteomics in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Biomarker Investigations: A Review
    Christina Jane Vellan, Jaime Jacqueline Jayapalan, Boon-Koon Yoong, Azlina Abdul-Aziz, Sarni Mat-Junit, Perumal Subramanian
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(4): 2093.     CrossRef
  • Biomarkers and Genetic Markers of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cholangiocarcinoma—What Do We Already Know
    Jacek Baj, Łukasz Bryliński, Filip Woliński, Michał Granat, Katarzyna Kostelecka, Piotr Duda, Jolanta Flieger, Grzegorz Teresiński, Grzegorz Buszewicz, Marzena Furtak-Niczyporuk, Piero Portincasa
    Cancers.2022; 14(6): 1493.     CrossRef
  • Preparation of a disposable electrochemiluminescence sensor chip based on an MXene-loaded ruthenium luminescent agent and its application in the detection of carcinoembryonic antigens
    Weiwei Luo, Zhuoxin Ye, Pinyi Ma, Qiong Wu, Daqian Song
    The Analyst.2022; 147(9): 1986.     CrossRef
  • Circulating Nucleic Acids as Novel Biomarkers for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Ryan McGowan, Áine Sally, Anthony McCabe, Brian Michael Moran, Karen Finn
    Cancers.2022; 14(8): 2027.     CrossRef
  • Recent Advances in Nanomaterial‐based Optical Biosensors as Potential Point‐of‐Care Testing (PoCT) Probes in Carcinoembryonic Antigen Detection
    Siew Suan Ng, Hooi Ling Lee, Pandian Bothi Raja, Ruey‐an Doong
    Chemistry – An Asian Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Carbon Material Hybrid Construction on an Aptasensor for Monitoring Surgical Tumors
    Renyuan Ma, Subash C. B. Gopinath, Thangavel Lakshmipriya, Yeng Chen, Larisa Lvova
    Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • CEA-regulated Oncolytic Virus Anticancer Therapy: A Promising Strategy for Rare Solid Tumors
    Yuqi Yang, Shuhang Wang, Peiwen Ma, Qiyu Tang, Yandong Li, Yuan Fang, Qi Zhu, Wei Tao, Yan Zha, Ning Li
    Current Cancer Drug Targets.2022; 22(2): 126.     CrossRef
  • Nomogram for Predicting Occult Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Before Surgery
    Zhixin Huang, Zhinuan Hong, Ling Chen, Mingqiang Kang
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predicting the benefit of stereotactic body radiotherapy of colorectal cancer metastases
    Sara Lindberg, Eva Onjukka, Peter Wersäll, Caroline Staff, Rolf Lewensohn, Giuseppe Masucci, Karin Lindberg
    Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology.2022; 36: 91.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Value of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Changes Before and After Operation for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Zhinuan Hong, Zhixin Huang, Zhen Chen, Mingqiang Kang
    World Journal of Surgery.2022; 46(11): 2725.     CrossRef
  • Toxic metals in cement induced hematological and DNA damage as well as carcinogenesis in occupationally-Exposed block-factory workers in Lagos, Nigeria
    Tajudeen Yahaya, Esther Oladele, Titilola Salisu, Esther Orji, Zafira Zakari, Umar Usman Liman, Clement Boniface Gomo, Mustapha Abdullahi
    Egyptian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences.2022; 9(1): 499.     CrossRef
  • Identification of a Five-MiRNA Expression Assay to Aid Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis
    Matthew G. Davey, Gerard Feeney, Heidi Annuk, Maxwell Paganga, Emma Holian, Aoife J. Lowery, Michael J. Kerin, Nicola Miller
    Gastrointestinal Disorders.2022; 4(3): 190.     CrossRef
  • Label-Free Immunosensor Based on Polyaniline-Loaded MXene and Gold-Decorated β-Cyclodextrin for Efficient Detection of Carcinoembryonic Antigen
    Qi Wang, Huaqian Xin, Zhou Wang
    Biosensors.2022; 12(8): 657.     CrossRef
  • The tumor microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma and its targeting strategy by CAR-T cell immunotherapy
    Zhang Guizhen, Ji Guanchang, Liu Liwen, Wang Huifen, Ren Zhigang, Sun Ranran, Yu Zujiang
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Increased Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Level Is Highly Associated with Low Skeletal Muscle Mass in Asymptomatic Adults: A Population-Based Study
    Chul-Hyun Park, Antonio Diaz Lizarraga, Yong-Taek Lee, Kyung-Jae Yoon, Tae-Kyung Yoo
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(17): 5009.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative albumin–bilirubin score as a prognostic indicator in patients with stage III colon cancer
    Hyun Gu Lee, Seok-Byung Lim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Jin Cheon Kim
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Novel, Quick, and Reliable Smartphone-Based Method for Serum PSA Quantification: Original Design of a Portable Microfluidic Immunosensor-Based System
    Francisco Gabriel Ortega, Germán E. Gómez, Coral González-Martinez, Teresa Valero, José Expósito-Hernández, Ignacio Puche, Alba Rodriguez-Martinez, María José Serrano, José Antonio Lorente, Martín A. Fernández-Baldo
    Cancers.2022; 14(18): 4483.     CrossRef
  • Microfluidics‐Based Urine Biopsy for Cancer Diagnosis: Recent Advances and Future Trends
    Yanping Wang, Yanfeng Gao, Yujun Song
    ChemMedChem.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma with a predominant HCC component: better survival and MRI-based prediction
    Yuyao Xiao, Xinde Zheng, Changwu Zhou, Peng Huang, Fei Wu, Chun Yang, Mengsu Zeng
    European Radiology.2022; 33(2): 1412.     CrossRef
  • The recent advancements in the early detection of cancer biomarkers by DNAzyme-assisted aptasensors
    Hossein Kamali, Shiva Golmohammadzadeh, Hamed Zare, Rahim Nosrati, Mohammad Fereidouni, Hossein Safarpour
    Journal of Nanobiotechnology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Indicative Value of Serum Tumor Markers for Metastasis and Stage of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Chunyang Jiang, Mengyao Zhao, Shaohui Hou, Xiaoli Hu, Jinchao Huang, Hongci Wang, Changhao Ren, Xiaoying Pan, Ti Zhang, Shengnan Wu, Shun Zhang, Bingsheng Sun
    Cancers.2022; 14(20): 5064.     CrossRef
  • Immunometabolic profiling of cervicovaginal lavages identifies key signatures associated with adenomyosis
    Georgia M. Lorentzen, Paweł Łaniewski, Haiyan Cui, Denise J. Roe, Jamal Mourad, Nichole D. Mahnert, Leslie V. Farland, Melissa M. Herbst-Kralovetz
    iScience.2022; 25(12): 105508.     CrossRef
  • Detection of circulating KRAS mutant DNA in extracellular vesicles using droplet digital PCR in patients with colon cancer
    Jeesoo Choi, Ho Yeon Cho, Jeongseok Jeon, Kyung-A Kim, Yoon Dae Han, Joong Bae Ahn, Inbal Wortzel, David Lyden, Han Sang Kim
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Old and New Blood Markers in Human Colorectal Cancer
    Jean-Luc Wautier, Marie-Paule Wautier
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(21): 12968.     CrossRef
  • Adnexal masses in patients with colorectal cancer
    Utku Akgor, Oguzhan Kuru, Burcu Soyak, Ali Can Gunes, Esra Uyanık, Murat Gultekin, Nejat Ozgul, Coskun Salman
    Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction.2021; 50(5): 101898.     CrossRef
  • Identifying Novel Biomarkers Ready for Evaluation in Low-Prevalence Populations for the Early Detection of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review
    Natalia Calanzani, Paige E. Druce, Claudia Snudden, Kristi M. Milley, Rachel Boscott, Dawnya Behiyat, Smiji Saji, Javiera Martinez-Gutierrez, Jasmeen Oberoi, Garth Funston, Mike Messenger, Jon Emery, Fiona M. Walter
    Advances in Therapy.2021; 38(2): 793.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen levels before and after curative surgery in colon cancer patients
    Hyun Ryung Kim, Jeong Il Joo, Sang Woo Lim, Bo Young Oh
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2021; 100(1): 33.     CrossRef
  • Site-Specific N-Linked Glycosylation Analysis of Human Carcinoembryonic Antigen by Sheathless Capillary Electrophoresis–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
    Laura Pont, Valeriia Kuzyk, Fernando Benavente, Victoria Sanz-Nebot, Oleg A. Mayboroda, Manfred Wuhrer, Guinevere S. M. Lageveen-Kammeijer
    Journal of Proteome Research.2021; 20(3): 1666.     CrossRef
  • A two-tiered targeted proteomics approach to identify pre-diagnostic biomarkers of colorectal cancer risk
    Sophia Harlid, Justin Harbs, Robin Myte, Carl Brunius, Marc J. Gunter, Richard Palmqvist, Xijia Liu, Bethany Van Guelpen
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Roadmap of Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Enea Ferlizza, Rossella Solmi, Michela Sgarzi, Luigi Ricciardiello, Mattia Lauriola
    Cancers.2021; 13(5): 1101.     CrossRef
  • Optimizing the diagnosis and management of ductal prostate cancer
    Weranja Ranasinghe, Daniel D. Shapiro, Miao Zhang, Tharakeswara Bathala, Nora Navone, Timothy C. Thompson, Bradley Broom, Ana Aparicio, Shi-Ming Tu, Chad Tang, John W. Davis, Louis Pisters, Brian F. Chapin
    Nature Reviews Urology.2021; 18(6): 337.     CrossRef
  • Identifying Novel Biomarkers Ready for Evaluation in Low-Prevalence Populations for the Early Detection of Lower Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Paige Druce, Natalia Calanzani, Claudia Snudden, Kristi Milley, Rachel Boscott, Dawnya Behiyat, Javiera Martinez-Gutierrez, Smiji Saji, Jasmeen Oberoi, Garth Funston, Mike Messenger, Fiona M. Walter, Jon Emery
    Advances in Therapy.2021; 38(6): 3032.     CrossRef
  • Metachronous pulmonary and pancreatic metastases arising from sigmoid colon cancer: A case report
    Jian Yang, Yu-Chen Tang, Ni Yin, Wei Liu, Zhi-Fei Cao, Xi Li, Xiao Zou, Zi-Xiang Zhang, Jian Zhou
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2021; 9(15): 3668.     CrossRef
  • Biomarkers in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: Are we closer to finding the golden ticket?
    Robert S O'Neill, Alina Stoita
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(26): 4045.     CrossRef
  • Unique structural features of the adenylate kinase hCINAP/AK6 and its multifaceted functions in carcinogenesis and tumor progression
    Ruidan Xu, Yongfeng Yang, Xiaofeng Zheng
    FEBS Letters.2021; 595(16): 2071.     CrossRef
  • Has the COVID-19 Pandemic Caused Upshifting in Colorectal Cancer Stage?
    Ji Ha Lim, Woo Yong Lee, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Yong Beom Cho, Jung Wook Huh, Yoon Ah Park, Jung Kyong Shin
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(4): 253.     CrossRef
  • SERS liquid biopsy: An emerging tool for medical diagnosis
    Vlad Moisoiu, Stefania D. Iancu, Andrei Stefancu, Tudor Moisoiu, Barbara Pardini, Mihnea P. Dragomir, Nicolae Crisan, Lucretia Avram, Dana Crisan, Iulia Andras, Daniela Fodor, Loredana F. Leopold, Carmen Socaciu, Zoltán Bálint, Ciprian Tomuleasa, Florin E
    Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces.2021; 208: 112064.     CrossRef
  • Risk-Predictive and Diagnostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer; a Systematic Review of Studies Using Pre-Diagnostic Blood Samples Collected in Prospective Cohorts and Screening Settings
    Sophia Harlid, Marc J. Gunter, Bethany Van Guelpen
    Cancers.2021; 13(17): 4406.     CrossRef
  • The Level of Preoperative Plasma KRAS Mutations and CEA Predict Survival of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases
    Jiri Polivka, Jindra Windrichova, Martin Pesta, Katerina Houfkova, Hana Rezackova, Tereza Macanova, Ondrej Vycital, Radek Kucera, David Slouka, Ondrej Topolcan
    Cancers.2020; 12(9): 2434.     CrossRef
  • Thionine-doped nanometer-sized silica conjugated with phenylboronic acid: An innovative recognition/signal element for voltammetric aptasensing of colorectal cancer-related carcinoembryonic antigen
    Liangjie Chi, Chao Xu, Shuyuan Li, Xiangyu Wang, Dianping Tang, Fangqin Xue
    Analytica Chimica Acta.2020; 1136: 91.     CrossRef
  • Molecularly Imprinted Polymers in Biological Applications
    Zahra El-Schich, Yuecheng Zhang, Marek Feith, Sarah Beyer, Louise Sternbæk, Lars Ohlsson, Maria Stollenwerk, Anette Gjörloff Wingren
    BioTechniques.2020; 69(6): 407.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Value of Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Symptomatic Patients without Colorectal Cancer: A Post-Hoc Analysis within the COLONPREDICT Cohort
    Noel Pin-Vieito, María José Iglesias, David Remedios, Victoria Álvarez-Sánchez, Fernando Fernández-Bañares, Jaume Boadas, Eva Martínez-Bauer, Rafael Campo, Luis Bujanda, Ángel Ferrández, Virginia Piñol, Daniel Rodríguez-Alcalde, Martín Menéndez-Rodríguez,
    Diagnostics.2020; 10(12): 1036.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Malignant disease, Prognosis and adjuvant therapy
Long-term Oncologic Outcome of Postoperative Complications After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Chang Kyu Oh, Jung Wook Huh, You Jin Lee, Moon Suk Choi, Dae Hee Pyo, Sung Chul Lee, Seong Mun Park, Jung Kyong Shin, Yoon Ah Park, Yong Beom Cho, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):273-280.   Published online November 13, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.10.15
  • 4,856 View
  • 167 Download
  • 21 Web of Science
  • 21 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The impact of postoperative complications on long-term oncologic outcome after radical colorectal cancer surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the risk factors and oncologic outcomes of surgery-related postoperative complication groups.
Methods
From January 2010 to December 2010, 310 patients experienced surgery-related postoperative complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery. These stage I–III patients were classified into 2 subgroups, minor (grades I, II) and major (grades III, IV) complication groups, according to extended Clavien-Dindo classification system criteria. Clinicopathologic differences between the 2 groups were analyzed to identify risk factors for major complications. The diseasefree survival rates of surgery-related postoperative complication groups were also compared.
Results
Minor and major complication groups were stratified with 194 patients (62.6%) and 116 patients (37.4%), respectively. The risk factors influencing the major complication group were pathologic N category and operative method. The prognostic factors associated with disease-free survival were preoperative perforation, perineural invasion, tumor budding, and receiving neoadjuvant therapy. With a median follow-up period of 72.2 months, the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 84.4% in the minor group and 78.5% in the major group, but there was no statistical significance between the minor and major groups (P = 0.392).
Conclusion
Advanced cancer and open surgery were identified as risk factors for increased surgery-related major complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery. However, severity of postoperative complications did not affect disease-free survival from colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Oncologic impact of technical difficulties during the early experience with laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: long-term follow-up results of a prospective cohort study
    Hong-min Ahn, Tae Gyun Lee, Hye-Rim Shin, Jeehye Lee, In Jun Yang, Jung Wook Suh, Heung-Kwon Oh, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang
    Current Problems in Surgery.2025; 63: 101694.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Preoperative and Intraoperative Factors on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A 10-Year Retrospective Study
    Lucian Flavius Herlo, Ioana Golu, Alexandra Herlo, Claudia Raluca Balasa Virzob, Ionescu Alin, Stela Iurciuc, Ionut Eduard Iordache, Luana Alexandrescu, Doina Ecaterina Tofolean, Raluca Dumache
    Diseases.2025; 13(1): 16.     CrossRef
  • Accelerated enhanced recovery after colon cancer surgery with discharge within one day after surgery: a systematic review
    Misha A. T. Sier, Anke H. C. Gielen, Thaís T. T. Tweed, Noémi C. van Nie, Tim Lubbers, Jan H. M. B. Stoot
    BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors of Postoperative Complication and Hospital Mortality after Colorectal Perforation Surgery
    Kensuke Kudou, Shuhei Kajiwara, Takashi Motomura, Takafumi Yukaya, Tomonori Nakanoko, Yosuke Kuroda, Masahiro Okamoto, Tadashi Koga, Yo-Ichi Yamashita
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2024; 8(2): 118.     CrossRef
  • Predictive value of POSSUM scoring system for postoperative complications and mortality in elderly patients with colorectal cancer
    Qiang Li, Yingjun Lu
    Technology and Health Care.2024; 32(6): 4653.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative Complications Result in Poor Oncological Outcomes: What Is the Evidence?
    Anjana Wajekar, Sohan Lal Solanki, Juan Cata, Vijaya Gottumukkala
    Current Oncology.2024; 31(8): 4632.     CrossRef
  • The role of robotic-assisted surgery in the management of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chenxiong Zhang, Hao Tan, Han Xu, Jiaming Ding
    International Journal of Surgery.2024; 110(10): 6282.     CrossRef
  • Effect of postoperative complications on 5-year survival following laparoscopic surgery for resectable colorectal cancer: a retrospective study
    Jae Eun Lee, Kyeong Eui Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek, Sung Uk Bae
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery in Rectal Cancer: Analysis of Medium-Term Oncological Outcomes
    Jing-jing Li, Zhi-bo Zhang, Shi-yun Xu, Cheng-ren Zhang, Xiong-fei Yang, Yao-xing Duan
    Surgical Innovation.2023; 30(1): 36.     CrossRef
  • Do postoperative infectious complications really affect long‐term survival in colorectal cancer surgery? A multicenter retrospective cohort study
    Akihisa Matsuda, Hiroshi Maruyama, Shinji Akagi, Toru Inoue, Kenichiro Uemura, Minako Kobayashi, Hisanori Shiomi, Manabu Watanabe, Hiroki Arai, Yutaka Kojima, Yusuke Mizuuchi, Hajime Yokomizo, Yuji Toiyama, Toru Miyake, Yasuyuki Yokoyama, Kei Ishimaru, Sh
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2023; 7(1): 110.     CrossRef
  • International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment
    Audrius Dulskas, Philip F. Caushaj, Domas Grigoravicius, Liu Zheng, Richard Fortunato, Joseph W. Nunoo-Mensah, Narimantas E. Samalavicius
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(4): 307.     CrossRef
  • Effect of serum lactate dehydrogenase-to-albumin ratio (LAR) on the short-term outcomes and long-term prognosis of colorectal cancer after radical surgery
    Xin-Peng Shu, Ying-Chun Xiang, Fei Liu, Yong Cheng, Wei Zhang, Dong Peng
    BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Modified Clavien–Dindo–sink classification system for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Ndéye F. Guissé, Joseph D. Stone, Lukas G. Keil, Tracey P. Bastrom, Mark A. Erickson, Burt Yaszay, Patrick J. Cahill, Stefan Parent, Peter G. Gabos, Peter O. Newton, Michael P. Glotzbecker, Michael P. Kelly, Joshua M. Pahys, Nicholas D. Fletcher
    Spine Deformity.2022; 10(1): 87.     CrossRef
  • Surgical site infection after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer is associated with compromised long-term oncological outcome
    Nana Sugamata, Takashi Okuyama, Emiko Takeshita, Haruka Oi, Yuhei Hakozaki, Shunya Miyazaki, Musashi Takada, Takashi Mitsui, Takuji Noro, Hideyuki Yoshitomi, Masatoshi Oya
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Does Preoperative Waiting Time Affect the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer Patients? A Retrospective Study from the West of China
    Xiao-Yu Liu, Zi-Wei Li, Bing Kang, Yu-Xi Cheng, Wei Tao, Bin Zhang, Hua Zhang, Zheng-Qiang Wei, Dong Peng, Antonio Giovanni Solimando
    Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Surgical safety in the COVID-19 era: present and future considerations
    Young Il Kim, In Ja Park
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 102(6): 295.     CrossRef
  • Current status and role of robotic approach in patients with low-lying rectal cancer
    Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer
    Sung Uk Bae
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 577.     CrossRef
  • Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, and Current Management
    Seung Mi Yeo, Gyung Mo Son
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current Status and Future of Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Sung Uk Bae
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 221.     CrossRef
  • A propensity score-matched analysis of advanced energy devices and conventional monopolar device for colorectal cancer surgery: comparison of clinical and oncologic outcomes
    Woo Jin Song, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(5): 290.     CrossRef
Oncologic Outcomes of Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Stage II and III Upper Rectal Cancer
Ji Eun Yoon, Soo Young Lee, Han Duk Kwak, Seung Seop Yeom, Chang Hyun Kim, Jae Kyun Joo, Hyeong Rok Kim, Young Jin Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(3):137-143.   Published online June 30, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.09.28
  • 4,133 View
  • 106 Download
  • 4 Web of Science
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The aim of this study was to assess oncological outcomes of postoperative radiotherapy plus chemotherapy (CRT) versus chemotherapy alone (CTx) in stage II or III upper rectal cancer patients who underwent curative surgery.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 263 consecutive patients with pathologic stage II or III upper rectal cancer who underwent primary curative resection with postoperative CRT or CTx from January 2008 to December 2014 at Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital. Multivariate and propensity score matching analyses were used to reduce selection bias.
Results
Median follow-up was 48.1 months for the entire cohort and 53.5 months for the matched cohort. In subgroup analysis of the propensity score matched cohort, the 3-year local recurrence-free survival was 94.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.8%–100%) in the CRT group and 90.1% (95% CI, 82.8%–97.9%) in the CTx group (P = 0.370). No significant difference in disease-free survival was observed according to treatment type. On multivariate analysis, circumferential resection margin involvement (hazard ratio [HR], 2.386; 95% CI, 1.190–7.599; P = 0.032), N stage (HR, 6.262; 95% CI, 1.843–21.278, P = 0.003), and T stage (HR, 5.896, 95% CI, 1.298–6.780, P = 0.021) were identified as independent risk factors for local recurrence of tumors of the upper rectum.
Conclusion
Omission of radiotherapy in an adjuvant treatment setting may not jeopardize oncologic outcomes in stages II and III upper rectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Is radiotherapy necessary for upper rectal cancer underwent curative resection? A retrospective study of 363 patients
    Zhiwei Ma, Jumei Zhou, Ke Liu, Sisi Chen, Qinghui Wu, Lin Peng, Wei Zhao, Suyu Zhu
    Radiation Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Rectal Cancer 2023 Supplement
    Sean J. Langenfeld, Bradley R. Davis, Jon D. Vogel, Jennifer S. Davids, Larissa K.F. Temple, Kyle G. Cologne, Samantha Hendren, Steven Hunt, Julio Garcia Aguilar, Daniel L. Feingold, Amy L. Lightner, Ian M. Paquette
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Which Definition of Upper Rectal Cancer Is Optimal in Selecting Stage II or III Rectal Cancer Patients to Avoid Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation?
    Xian Hua Gao, Bai Zhi Zhai, Juan Li, Jean Luc Tshibangu Kabemba, Hai Feng Gong, Chen Guang Bai, Ming Lu Liu, Shao Ting Zhang, Fu Shen, Lian Jie Liu, Wei Zhang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Role of adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis
    Xin-qi Shi, Jing-yu Zhang, Hua Tian, Ling-na Tang, Ai-lin Li
    Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B.2020; 21(7): 549.     CrossRef

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP