Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
78 "Recurrence"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Funded articles
Display
Original Article
Anorectal physiology & pelvic floor disorder
Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy with and without transverse perineal support using biological mesh for rectal prolapse and perineal descent: postoperative course and functional outcomes
Maria Clelia Gervasi, Giorgio Brancato, Lorenzo Crepaz, Ahmad Tfaily, Alberto Di Leo
Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(5):453-461.   Published online October 28, 2025
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00080.0011
  • 560 View
  • 30 Download
AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) is effective for the treatment of rectal prolapse. However, descending perineal syndrome may impair the outcomes of LVMR. The aim of this study was to assess the safety and functional outcomes of LVMR performed with and without transverse perineal support (TPS).
Methods
This was a retrospective study of 143 consecutive female patients treated with LVMR with or without TPS between 2018 and 2022. Patients with rectal prolapse and perineal descent who underwent surgery were included. Obstructed defecation syndrome and fecal incontinence were evaluated using the Cleveland Constipation Score (Wexner score) and St. Mark’s Incontinence Score, respectively. Perineal descent was defined using defecography. Biological meshes were utilized in all cases.
Results
No significant differences were recorded between with- and without-TPS groups at baseline. TPS was performed in 110 patients (76.9%). Surgical morbidity was higher in the with-TPS group (12.7% vs. 0%, P=0.047), primarily due to seroma formation. Almost all complications were mild (Clavien-Dindo grades I–II). In both groups, digital aid for defecation (P<0.001), prolonged straining (P=0.004), and hematochezia (P<0.001) nearly disappeared postoperatively, though constipation and laxative/enema use persisted in 22.4%. Fecal incontinence significantly decreased from 43.4% to 11.2% (P<0.001). TPS appears to have a potentially favorable effect in reducing the constipation score. Both constipation and incontinence scores remained low up to 24 months after surgery. Operative time was significantly longer in the LVMR with-TPS group (P<0.001).
Conclusion
LVMR with TPS appears safe and feasible. TPS may provide better surgical outcomes compared to LVMR alone for patients with symptomatic rectoceles and descending perineum syndrome.
Review
Colorectal cancer
The role of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in advanced rectal cancer: a review of current evidence and outcomes
Gyu-Seog Choi, Hye Jin Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):363-374.   Published online August 30, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00521.0074
  • 15,686 View
  • 729 Download
  • 9 Web of Science
  • 12 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPNs) in rectal cancer significantly impact the prognosis and treatment strategies. Western practices emphasize neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), whereas Eastern approaches often rely on LPN dissection (LPND). This review examines the evolving role of LPND in the context of modern treatments, including total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), and the impact of CRT on the management of clinically suspicious LPNs. We comprehensively reviewed the key literature comparing the outcomes of LPND versus preoperative CRT for rectal cancer, focusing on recent advancements and ongoing debates. Key studies, including the JCOG0212 trial and recent multicenter trials, were analyzed to assess the efficacy of LPND, particularly in conjunction with preoperative CRT or TNT. Current evidence indicates that LPND can reduce local recurrence rates compared to total mesorectal excision alone in patients not receiving radiation therapy. However, the benefit of LPND in the context of neoadjuvant CRT is influenced by the size and pretreatment characteristics of LPNs. While CRT can effectively control smaller metastatic LPNs, larger or clinically suspicious LPNs may require LPND for optimal outcomes. Advances in surgical techniques, such as robotic-assisted LPND, offer potential benefits but also present challenges and complications. The role of TNT in controlling metastatic LPNs and improving patient outcomes is emerging but remains underexplored. The decision to perform LPND should be individualized based on patient-specific factors, including LPN size, response to neoadjuvant treatment, and surgeon expertise. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment protocols and further evaluating the role of TNT in managing metastatic LPNs.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Who is a candidate at the initial presentation? Prediction of positive lateral lymph node and survival after dissection
    Y. Lee
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The oncologic benefits of lateral lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant therapy – local control or survival?
    T. Sammour
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Locally‐Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Cohort Study Comparing Perioperative Morbidity and Short‐Term Oncological Outcomes
    Joseph Mathew, Yogesh Kisan Bansod, Nishant Yadav, Janesh Murugan, Kovvuru Bhaskar Reddy, Mufaddal Kazi, Ashwin DeSouza, Avanish Saklani
    Cancer Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in colorectal cancer management: a narrative review of clinical efficacy and multidisciplinary integration
    Engeng Chen, Li Chen, Wei Zhang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Cirugía por cáncer de recto más allá del mesorrecto: indicaciones, preparación límites y resultados
    Blas Flor-Lorente, Mario Javier de Miguel Valencia
    Cirugía Española.2025; 103(9): 800202.     CrossRef
  • Surgery for rectal cancer beyond the mesorectum: Indications, preparation, limits, and results
    Blas Flor-Lorente, Mario J. de Miguel-Valencia
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2025; 103(9): 800202.     CrossRef
  • Cancer-associated fibroblasts enhance colorectal cancer lymphatic metastasis via CLEC11A/LGR5-mediated WNT pathway activation
    Chuhan Zhang, Teng Pan, Yuyuan Zhang, Yushuai Wu, Anning Zuo, Shutong Liu, Yuhao Ba, Benyu Liu, Shuaixi Yang, Yukang Chen, Hui Xu, Peng Luo, Quan Cheng, Siyuan Weng, Long Liu, Xing Zhou, Jingyuan Ning, Xinwei Han, Jinhai Deng, Zaoqu Liu
    Journal of Clinical Investigation.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for rectal cancer—A video vignette
    D. Castrodá, M. Paniagua, L. Pérez Corbal, L. Otalora, R. Oubiña, A. Parajó
    Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Learning curve for lateral lymph node dissection in rectal cancer – a systematic review of literature
    D. Kehagias, L. Baldari, E. Cassinotti, L. Boni, C. Lampropoulos, I. Kehagias
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pelvic Neuroanatomy in Colorectal Surgery: Advances in Nerve Preservation for Optimized Functional Outcomes
    Asim M. Almughamsi, Yasir Hassan Elhassan
    Surgeries.2025; 6(4): 94.     CrossRef
  • Targeting lateral pelvic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: response to neoadjuvant therapy and artificial intelligence driven clinical decision support
    Ruiqing Liu, Yun Lu, Luca Stocchi
    Intelligent Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • From the Editor: Uniting expertise, a new era of global collaboration in coloproctology
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 285.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Translational/basic research
Exfoliate cancer cell analysis in rectal cancer surgery: comparison of laparoscopic and transanal total mesorectal excision, a pilot study
Kiho You, Jung-Ah Hwang, Dae Kyung Sohn, Dong Woon Lee, Sung Sil Park, Kyung Su Han, Chang Won Hong, Bun Kim, Byung Chang Kim, Sung Chan Park, Jae Hwan Oh
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(6):502-512.   Published online December 26, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00479.0068
  • 3,561 View
  • 117 Download
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDFSupplementary Material
Purpose
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) is currently the standard treatment for rectal cancer. However, its limitations include complications and incomplete total mesorectal resection (TME) due to anatomical features and technical difficulties. Transanal TME (TaTME) has been practiced since 2010 to improve this, but there is a risk of local recurrence and intra-abdominal contamination. We aimed to analyze samples obtained through lavage to compare laparoscopic TME (LapTME) and TaTME.
Methods
From June 2020 to January 2021, 20 patients with rectal cancer undergoing MIS were consecutively and prospectively recruited. Samples were collected at the start of surgery, immediately after TME, and after irrigation. The samples were analyzed for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and cytokeratin 20 (CK20) through a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. The primary outcome was to compare the detected amounts of CEA and CK20 immediately after TME between the surgical methods.
Results
Among the 20 patients, 13 underwent LapTME and 7 underwent TaTME. Tumor location was lower in TaTME (7.3 cm vs. 4.6 cm, P=0.012), and negative mesorectal fascia (MRF) was more in LapTME (76.9% vs. 28.6%, P=0.044). CEA and CK20 levels were high in 3 patients (42.9%) only in TaTME. There was 1 case of T4 with incomplete purse-string suture and 1 case of positive MRF with dissection failure. All patients were followed up for an average of 32.5 months without local recurrence.
Conclusion
CEA and CK20 levels were high only in TaTME and were related to tumor factors or intraoperative events. However, whether the detection amount is clinically related to local recurrence remains unclear.
Colorectal cancer
Partial mesorectal excision can be a primary option for middle rectal cancer: a propensity score–matched retrospective analysis
Ee Jin Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(3):253-267.   Published online March 31, 2023
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00689.0098
  • 5,604 View
  • 220 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Although partial mesorectal excision (PME) and total mesorectal excision (TME) is primarily indicated for the upper and lower rectal cancer, respectively, few studies have evaluated whether PME or TME is more optimal for middle rectal cancer.
Methods
This study included 671 patients with middle and upper rectal cancer who underwent robot-assisted PME or TME. The 2 groups were optimized by propensity score matching of sex, age, clinical stage, tumor location, and neoadjuvant treatment.
Results
Complete mesorectal excision was achieved in 617 of 671 patients (92.0%), without showing a difference between the PME and TME groups. Local recurrence rate (5.3% vs. 4.3%, P>0.999) and systemic recurrence rate (8.5% vs. 16.0%, P=0.181) also did not differ between the 2 groups, in patients with middle and upper rectal cancer. The 5-year disease-free survival (81.4% vs. 74.0%, P=0.537) and overall survival (88.0% vs. 81.1%, P=0.847) also did not differ between the PME and TME groups, confined to middle rectal cancer. Moreover, 5-year recurrence and survival rates were not affected by distal resection margins of 2 cm (P=0.112) to 4 cm (P>0.999), regardless of pathological stages. Postoperative complication rate was higher in the TME than in the PME group (21.4% vs. 14.5%, P=0.027). Incontinence was independently associated with TME (odds ratio [OR], 2.009; 95% confidence interval, 1.015–3.975; P=0.045), along with older age (OR, 4.366, P<0.001) and prolonged operation time (OR, 2.196; P=0.500).
Conclusion
PME can be primarily recommended for patients with middle rectal cancer with lower margin of >5 cm from the anal verge.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Review of definition and treatment of upper rectal cancer
    Elias Karam, Fabien Fredon, Yassine Eid, Olivier Muller, Marie Besson, Nicolas Michot, Urs Giger-Pabst, Arnaud Alves, Mehdi Ouaissi
    Surgical Oncology.2024; 57: 102145.     CrossRef
  • Tumour-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and functional outcomes
    Fabio Carbone, Wanda Petz, Simona Borin, Emilio Bertani, Stefano de Pascale, Maria Giulia Zampino, Uberto Fumagalli Romario
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 49(11): 107069.     CrossRef
Colorectal cancer
Recurrence following transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a monocentric retrospective series of technically difficult cases
Jonathan Frigault, Geneviève Morin, Sébastien Drolet, Philippe Bouchard, Alexandre Bouchard, Thanh-Quan Philips Ngo, François Letarte
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(4):332-341.   Published online November 14, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00178.0025
  • 4,472 View
  • 76 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) has been proposed to overcome surgical difficulties encountered during rectal resection, especially for patients having high body mass index or low rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate oncologic outcomes following TaTME.
Methods
This retrospective study included all consecutive patients with rectal cancer who had a TaTME from 2013 to 2019. The main outcome was the incidence of locoregional recurrence by the end of the follow-up period.
Results
Among a total of 81 patients, 96.3% were male, and their mean age was 63±9 years. The mean body mass index was 30.3±5.7 kg/m2, and the median distance from tumor to anal verge was 5.0 cm (interquartile range [IQR], 4.0–6.0 cm). Most patients had a low anterior resection performed (n=80, 98.8%) with a diverting ileostomy (n=64, 79.0%). Distal and circumferential resection margins were positive in 2.5% and 6.2% of patients, respectively. Total mesorectal excision was complete or near complete in 95.1% of patients. A successful resection was achieved in 72 patients (88.9%). After a median follow-up of 27.5 months (IQR, 16.7–48.1 months), 4 patients (4.9%) experienced locoregional recurrence. Anastomotic leaks were observed in 21 patients (25.9%). At the end of the follow-up, 69 patients (85.2%) were stoma-free.
Conclusion
TaTME was associated with acceptable oncological outcomes, including low locoregional recurrence rates in selected patients with low rectal cancer. Although associated with a high incidence of postoperative morbidities, the use of TaTME enabled a high rate of successful sphincter-saving procedures in selected patients who posed a technical challenge.
Anorectal benign disease
Garg scoring system to predict long-term healing in cryptoglandular anal fistulas: a prospective validation study
Sushil Dawka, Vipul D. Yagnik, Baljit Kaur, Geetha R. Menon, Pankaj Garg
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(5):490-497.   Published online October 11, 2022
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00346.0049
  • 4,962 View
  • 138 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Complex anal fistulas can recur after clinical healing, even after a long interval which leads to significant anxiety. Also, ascertaining the efficacy of any new treatment procedure becomes difficult and takes several years. We prospectively analyzed the validity of Garg scoring system (GSS) to predict long-term fistula healing.
Methods
In patients operated for cryptoglandular anal fistulas, magnetic resonance imaging was performed preoperatively and at 3 months postoperatively to assess fistula healing. Scores as per the GSS were calculated for each patient at 3 months postoperatively and correlated with long-term healing to check the accuracy of the scoring system.
Results
Fifty-seven patients were enrolled, but 50 were finally included (7 were excluded). These 50 patients (age, 41.2±12.4 years; 46 men) were followed up for 12 to 20 months (median, 17 months). Forty-seven patients (94.0%) had complex fistulas, 28 (56.0%) had recurrent fistulas, 48 (96.0%) had multiple tracts, 20 (40.0%) had horseshoe tracts, 15 (32.0%) had associated abscesses, 5 (10.0%) were suprasphincteric, and 8 (16.0%) were supralevator fistulas. The GSS could accurately predict long-term healing (high positive predictive value, 31 of 31 [100%]) but was not very accurate in predicting nonhealing (negative predictive value, 15 of 19 [78.9%]). The sensitivity in predicting healing was 31 of 35 (88.6%).
Conclusion
GSS accurately predicts long-term fistula with a high positive predictive value (100%) but is less accurate in predicting nonhealing. This scoring system can help allay anxiety in patients and facilitate the early validation of innovative procedures for anal fistulas.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • External validation of the modified Parks classification of cryptoglandular anal fistula to predict failure of healing: the protocol for a retrospective analysis
    Alireza Teymouri, Amir Keshvari, Faezeh Khorasanizadeh, Alireza Kazemeini, Behnam Behboudi, Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli, Mohammad Reza Keramati, Ali Ashjaei, Seyed Mohsen Ahmadi Tafti, Amirhosein Naseri
    International Journal of Surgery Protocols.2025; 29(3): 118.     CrossRef
  • Recent Advances in the Understanding and Management of Anal Fistula from India
    Vipul D. Yagnik, Sandeep Kumar, Anshul Thakur, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Sushil Dawka, Pankaj Garg
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2024; 86(6): 1105.     CrossRef
  • Rectovaginal Fistulas Not Involving the Rectovaginal Septum Should Be Treated Like Anal Fistulas: A New Concept and Proposal for a Reclassification of Rectovaginal Fistulas
    Pankaj Garg, Laxmikant Ladukar, Vipul Yagnik, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Gurleen Kaur
    Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology.2024; Volume 17: 97.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances in the diagnosis and treatment of complex anal fistula
    Pankaj Garg, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Vipul D. Yagnik, G. Mahak
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 321.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of outcome in cryptoglandular anal fistula according to magnetic resonance imaging: A systematic review
    Alireza Teymouri, Amir Keshvari, Ali Ashjaei, Seyed Mohsen Ahmadi Tafti, Faeze Salahshour, Faezeh Khorasanizadeh, Amirhosein Naseri
    Health Science Reports.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Pankaj Garg: A Community Doctor to a Master Innovator to a Global Icon
    David N. Armstrong, Iwona Sudoł-Szopińska, Vincent de Parades, Francesco Litta, Manuel Limbert, Khaw C. W. James
    Global Journal of Medical, Pharmaceutical, and Biomedical Update.2023; 18: 16.     CrossRef
Incidence of anal fistula after pyogenic perianal abscess drainage in Kingdom of Bahrain
Zahra Abdulla Isa Yusuf Hasan, Bayan Mohamed, Rawaa AlSayegh, Raed AlMarzooq
Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(1):27-31.   Published online August 9, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.00962.0137
  • 10,449 View
  • 199 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 5 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Perianal fistula is one of the most common anorectal diseases in adult patients, especially men. A relationship between pyogenic perianal abscess and fistula formation is established in multiple domains. This is the first exploration of such association among patients in the country as no related study has been published in Bahrain. We expect this study to be a foundation for future protocols and evidence-based practice.
Methods
A retrospective study was conducted in Salmaniya Medical Complex of Bahrain. A total of 109 patients with a diagnosis of anal abscess were included between 2015 and 2018. Data were collected from the electronic files database used in Salmaniya Medical Complex (iSeha) as well as phone calls to the patients. Collected data were analyzed using statistical software.
Results
The most predominant presentation of perianal abscess was pain. Over 50% of abscesses were classified as perianal (56.9%) and among those, left-sided abscesses were more common, followed by right-, posterior-, and anterior-sited, respectively. No recurrence of abscess was recorded among 80% of patients. A fistula developed following abscess drainage in 33.9% of patients. Most fistulas (37.8%) were diagnosed within 6 months or less from abscess drainage. Posterior fistulas were the most common, followed by anterior and left-sided fistulas.
Conclusion
The incidence of anal fistula in Bahrain after perianal abscess was 33.9%. Most of the patients who developed a fistula following pyogenic abscess drainage were males and above the age of 40 years. The most common site for fistula was posterior.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Risk factors for perianal abscess recurrence after incision and drainage: a review of the literature
    Kheira Gabsi
    International Surgery Journal.2025; 12(2): 255.     CrossRef
  • A Review of the Anatomy of Anal Glands Relevant to Cryptoglandular Fistulas; Are We on the Right Track?
    James Church
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2025; 95(11): 2355.     CrossRef
  • Anal Cryptoglandular Suppuration
    Oladapo Akinmoladun, Quinton M. Hatch
    Surgical Clinics of North America.2024; 104(3): 491.     CrossRef
  • Proposal for a new classification of anorectal abscesses based on clinical characteristics and postoperative recurrence
    Shan-Zhong Chen, Kui-Jun Sun, Yi-Fan Gu, Hong-Yuan Zhao, Dong Wang, Yun-Fang Shi, Ren-Jie Shi
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(11): 3425.     CrossRef
  • Research Progress on Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Perianal Deep Space Abscess
    永罡 秦
    Advances in Clinical Medicine.2023; 13(01): 180.     CrossRef
Case Report
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer
Late Recurrence in a Rectal Cancer Patient Who Underwent Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Local Excision: A Case Report
Jin Soo Han, Seok-Byung Lim, Jin-hong Park, Yong Sang Hong
Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(Suppl 1):S24-S27.   Published online July 27, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.00073.0010
  • 4,365 View
  • 57 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Some patients who have undergone preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) following surgery have been diagnosed with late recurrence more than 5 years after treatment, raising questions about the possible benefit extending surveillance beyond the recommended 5 years. In 2011, a 71-year-old male patient was diagnosed with T3N+ low-lying rectal cancer located 3 cm from the anal verge before undergoing long-course preoperative CRT. After CRT, the patient was reexamined and diagnosed with ycT1–2N0 lesion, so local excision (LE) was performed. The patient underwent intensive surveillance for up to 5 years, and no evidence of recurrence was found. At 74 months after surgery, the patient was hospitalized for a hematochezia, and local recurrence at the excision site and peritoneal seeding nodules were identified. Considering the late recurrence in this patient, it might be necessary to long-term follow-up beyond 5 years in patients with preoperative CRT followed by LE.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effects of clinical information on the treatment decisions for good responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy among rectal cancer patients
    Eon Bin Kim, In Ja Park, Hwa Jung Kim, Jong Keon Jang, Seong Ho Park, Young Il Kim, Min Hyun Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(5): 473.     CrossRef
  • Coccygodynia in a Long-Term Cancer Survivor Diagnosed with Metastatic Cancer: A Case Report
    Jung Hyun Park, Seong Jin Park, Dulee Kim, Jae Hoo Park, So Young Kwon
    Medicina.2024; 60(8): 1365.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Malignant disease,Prognosis
Recurrence after endoscopic resection of small rectal neuroendocrine tumors: a retrospective cohort study
Sukit Pattarajierapan, Supakij Khomvilai
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(3):216-222.   Published online July 20, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00017.0002
  • 9,304 View
  • 199 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
According to the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society consensus guidelines, rectal neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) up to 10 mm in size and without poor prognostic factors could be safely removed with endoscopic resection, suggesting omitting surveillance colonoscopy after complete resection. However, the benefit of surveillance colonoscopy is still unknown. In this study, we aimed to report the outcomes after endoscopic resection of small rectal NETs using our surveillance protocol.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent endoscopic resection for rectal NETs sized up to 10 mm from January 2013 to December 2019 at our center. We excluded patients without surveillance colonoscopy and those lost to follow-up. We strictly performed surveillance colonoscopy 1 year after endoscopic resection, and every 2 to 3 years thereafter. The primary outcomes were tumor recurrence and occurrence of metachronous tumors during followup.
Results
Of the 54 patients who underwent endoscopic resection for rectal NETs during the study period, 46 were enrolled in this study. The complete resection rates by endoscopic mucosal resection, precutting endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection were 92.3% (12 of 13), 100% (21 of 21), and 100% (12 of 12), respectively. There was no local or distant recurrence during the median follow-up of 39 months. However, we found that 8.7% (4 of 46) of patients developed metachronous NETs. All metachronous lesions were treated with precutting endoscopic mucosal resection.
Conclusion
Surveillance colonoscopy is reasonable after endoscopic resection of small rectal NETs for timely detection and treatment of metachronous lesions. However, larger collaborative studies are needed to influence the guidelines.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Linked color imaging for detection and characterization of gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors
    Xin Pu, Yang Xu, Xueting Zhang, Zijin Yin, Yan Liu, Min Min
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the efficacy of endoscopic submucosal dissection and transanal endoscopic microsurgery in the treatment of rectal neuroendocrine tumors ≤ 2 cm
    Rui Jin, Xiaoyin Bai, Tianming Xu, Xi Wu, Qipu Wang, Jingnan Li
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current status of the role of endoscopy in evaluation and management of gastrointestinal and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors
    Zaheer Nabi, Sundeep Lakhtakia, D. Nageshwar Reddy
    Indian Journal of Gastroenterology.2023; 42(2): 158.     CrossRef
Malignant disease,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy,Colorectal cancer
Comparison of the oncological outcomes of stenting as a bridge to surgery and surgery alone in stages II to III obstructive colorectal cancer: a retrospective study
Hiroaki Uehara, Toshiyuki Yamazaki, Akira Iwaya, Hitoshi Kameyama, Masaru Komatsu, Motoharu Hirai
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(3):235-243.   Published online July 13, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.01067.0152
  • 8,037 View
  • 222 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 12 Citations
Graphical AbstractGraphical Abstract AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
We evaluated the oncological outcomes of bridge to surgery (BTS) using stent compared with surgery alone for obstructive colorectal cancer.
Methods
Consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for stages II to III obstructive colorectal cancer at our institution from January 2009 to March 2020, were registered retrospectively and divided into 43 patients in the BTS group and 65 patients in the surgery alone group. We compared the surgical and oncological outcomes between the 2 groups.
Results
Stent-related perforation did not occur. One patient in whom the stent placement was unsuccessful underwent emergency surgery with poor decompression (clinical success rate, 97.7%). The pathological characteristics were not significantly different between the groups. The following surgical outcomes in the BTS group were superior to those in the surgery alone group; nonemergency surgery (P<0.001), surgical approach (P=0.006), and length of hospital stay (P=0.020). The median follow-up time was 44.9 months (range, 1.1–126.5 months). The 3-year relapse-free survival rates were 68.4% and 58.2% (P=0.411), and the overall survival rates were 78.3% and 88.2% (P=0.255) in the surgery alone and BTS groups, respectively. The 3-year locoregional recurrence rates were 10.2% and 8.0% (P=0.948), and distant metastatic recurrence rates were 13.3% and 30.4% (P=0.035) in the surgery alone and BTS groups, respectively.
Conclusion
This study revealed that BTS with stent may be associated with a higher frequency of distant metastatic recurrence. Stent for stages II to III obstructive colorectal cancer potentially worsens oncological outcomes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Controversial issues of colon stenting in case of tumor obstructive intestinal obstruction: surgical and oncological aspects
    S.A. Aliyev, E.S. Aliyev, T.K. Aliyev
    Endoscopic Surgery.2025; 31(2): 65.     CrossRef
  • Transforming outcomes: the pivotal role of self-expanding metal stents in right- and left-sided malignant colorectal obstructions-bridge to surgery: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis
    Sheza Malik, Priyadarshini Loganathan, Hajra Khan, Abul Hasan Shadali, Pradeep Yarra, Saurabh Chandan, Babu P. Mohan, Douglas G. Adler, Shivangi Kothari
    Clinical Endoscopy.2025; 58(2): 240.     CrossRef
  • A rare case of massive colonic distention secondary to undiagnosed colon adenocarcinoma
    Chloe Lahoud, Toni Habib, Michel Al Achkar, Tyler Grantham, Nissar Ahmed
    Medical Reports.2025; 12: 100207.     CrossRef
  • Recurrence Rates and Postoperative Complications Following Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A 5-Year Study at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Peshawar
    Tilal Ahmed Raza, Hussain Jan Abbasi, Farrukh Ozair, Hajra Imtiaz
    Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences.2025; : 120.     CrossRef
  • Complete Obstruction, a Real Risk Factor: A Comprehensive Study on Obstruction in Stage IIA Colon Cancer With Propensity Score Matching Analysis
    Soo Young Oh, Chan Wook Kim, Seonok Kim, Min Hyun Kim, Young Il Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2024; 23(2): 135.     CrossRef
  • Can we use colon stenting in accelerated recovery programs for surgical treatment colon cancer complicated by obstructive intestinal obstruction? A literature review
    Saday A. Aliyev, Emil S. Aliyev
    Russian Journal of Oncology.2024; 29(2): 130.     CrossRef
  • Oncologic impact of colonic stents for obstructive left-sided colon cancer
    Hideyuki Suzuki, Shingo Tsujinaka, Yoshihiro Sato, Tomoya Miura, Chikashi Shibata
    World Journal of Clinical Oncology.2023; 14(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • 5-year oncological outcomes in left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: stent as bridge to surgery
    Noura S Alhassan, Sulaiman A AlShammari, Razan N AlRabah, Amirah M AlZahrani, Maha-Hamadien Abdulla, Thamer A Bin Traiki, Ahmad M Zubaidi, Omar A Al-Obeed, Khayal A Alkhayal
    BMC Gastroenterology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Impact of Postoperative Naples Prognostic Score to Predict Survival in Patients with Stage II–III Colorectal Cancer
    Su Hyeong Park, Hye Seung Woo, In Kyung Hong, Eun Jung Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(20): 5098.     CrossRef
  • Do Laparoscopic Approaches Ensure Oncological Safety and Prognosis for Serosa-Exposed Colon Cancer? A Comparative Study against the Open Approach
    Ji-Hyun Seo, In-Ja Park
    Cancers.2023; 15(21): 5211.     CrossRef
  • Recurrence Patterns and Risk Factors after Curative Resection for Colorectal Cancer: Insights for Postoperative Surveillance Strategies
    Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim, Ye Ryung Park, Eun Hae Cho, Jeong Min Choo, Ji-Seon Kim, Se-Jin Baek, Jung-Myun Kwak
    Cancers.2023; 15(24): 5791.     CrossRef
  • Colonic stent for bridge to surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: A review of the literature after 2020
    Margherita Binetti, Augusto Lauro, Valeria Tonini
    World Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022; 13(12): 957.     CrossRef
Benign proctology,Complication,Biomarker & risk factor
Longer prolapsed rectum length increases recurrence risk after Delorme’s procedure
Taro Tanabe, Emi Yamaguchi, Takuya Nakada, Risa Nishio, Kinya Okamoto, Tetsuo Yamana
Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(4):314-318.   Published online July 13, 2021
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.01032.0147
  • 6,374 View
  • 168 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Risk factors for recurrence of rectal prolapse after surgery remain unclear. Delorme’s procedure is often selected for relatively small-sized rectal prolapse, but there are few reports discussing the association between prolapsed rectum length and prolapse recurrence after Delorme’s procedure. We hypothesized that patients with longer rectal prolapses are at a higher risk of recurrence after Delorme’s procedure.
Methods
The study population comprised patients with rectal prolapse who underwent Delorme’s procedure between January 2014 and December 2019 at Tokyo Yamate Medical Center. We extracted data on patient age, sex, body mass index, previous history of anal surgery, previous history of surgery for rectal prolapse, and length of prolapse, to identify risk factors for prolapse recurrence.
Results
Altogether, 96 patients were eligible for analysis. The median length of the prolapsed rectum was 3.0 cm (range, 1.0–6.6 cm). Twenty-four patients (25.0%) experienced recurrence after Delorme’s procedure after a median of 7.5 months (interquartile range, 3.2–20.9 months). Multivariate analysis revealed that longer prolapsed rectum length increased the risk of recurrence after Delorme’s procedure (hazard ratio, 6.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.83–21.50; P<0.001).
Conclusion
The length of the prolapsed rectum should be measured before Delorme’s procedure for rectal prolapse, because length is associated with a risk of recurrence after the surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Surgical approaches for complete rectal prolapse
    Long Wu, Huan Wu, Song Mu, Xiao-Yun Li, Yun-Huan Zhen, Hai-Yang Li
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Tratamiento quirúrgico del prolapso rectal completo del adulto
    C. Korkmaz, G. Meurette
    EMC - Técnicas Quirúrgicas - Aparato Digestivo.2024; 40(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Trattamento chirurgico del prolasso rettale completo dell’adulto
    C. Korkmaz, G. Meurette
    EMC - Tecniche Chirurgiche Addominale.2024; 30(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • The Predictive Risk Factor of Postoperative Recurrence Following Altemeier's and Delorme's Procedures for Full-thickness Rectal Prolapse: An Analysis of 127 Japanese Patients in a Single Institution
    Yasuyuki Miura, Kimihiko Funahashi, Akiharu Kurihara, Satoru Kagami, Takayuki Suzuki, Kimihiko Yoshida, Mitsunori Ushigome, Tomoaki Kaneko
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2024; 8(3): 171.     CrossRef
  • Modified Altemeier Procedure as Management for Incarcerated Rectal Prolapse in a Young Healthy Male Patient: A Case Report and Literature Review
    Leenah Abdulgader, Ebtesam Al-Najjar, Bayan Khasawneh, Abdullah Esmail
    Medicina.2024; 60(11): 1872.     CrossRef
  • Traitement chirurgical du prolapsus rectal complet de l’adulte
    C. Korkmaz, G. Meurette
    EMC - Techniques chirurgicales - Appareil digestif.2023; 40(4): 1.     CrossRef
Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Prognosis and adjuvant therapy
Beware of Early Relapse in Rectal Cancer Patients Treated With Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
Seul Gi Oh, In Ja Park, Ji-hyun Seo, Young Il Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Jong Lyul Lee, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(6):382-389.   Published online June 17, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.06.11
  • 5,554 View
  • 104 Download
  • 7 Web of Science
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Recurrence patterns in rectal cancer patients treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy (PCRT) are needed to evaluate for establishing tailored surveillance protocol.
Methods
This study included 2,215 patients with locally-advanced mid and low rectal cancer treated with radical resection between January 2005 and December 2012. Recurrence was evaluated according to receipt of PCRT; PCRT group (n = 1,258) and no-PCRT group (n = 957). Early recurrence occurred within 1 year of surgery and late recurrence after 3 years. The median follow-up duration was 65.7 ± 29 months.
Results
The overall recurrence rate was similar between the PCRT and no-PCRT group (25.8% vs. 24.9%, P = 0.622). The most common initial recurrence site was the lungs in both groups (50.6% vs. 49.6%, P = 0.864), followed by the liver, which was more common in the no-PCRT group (22.5% vs. 33.6%, P = 0.004). Most of the recurrence occurred within 3 years after surgery in both groups (85.3% vs. 85.8%, P = 0.862). Early recurrence was more common in the PCRT group than in the no-PCRT group (43.1% vs. 32.4%, P = 0.020). Recurrence within the first 6 months after surgery was significantly higher in the PCRT group than in the no-PCRT group (18.8% vs. 7.6%, P = 0.003). Lung (n = 27, 44.3%) and liver (n = 22, 36.1%) were the frequent the first relapsed site within 6 months after surgery in PCRT group.
Conclusion
Early recurrence within the first 1 year after surgery was more common in patients treated with PCRT. This difference would be considered for surveillance protocols and need to be evaluated in further studies.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacies of radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision or other types of surgery: an updated meta-analysis
    Wenshu Wang, Runyuan Zhao, Xi Liang, Manjun Liu, Haiyan Bai, Jianli Ge, Binxi Yao, Zheng Zhi, Jianming He
    Oncology Reviews.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Watch and wait strategies for rectal cancer: A systematic review
    In Ja Park
    Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(2): 91.     CrossRef
  • Update on Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
    Chan Wook Kim
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The watch-and-wait strategy versus radical resection for rectal cancer patients with a good response (≤ycT2) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(6): 350.     CrossRef
  • Optimal Postoperative Surveillance Strategies for Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Observational Study
    Min-Young Park, In-Ja Park, Hyo-Seon Ryu, Jay Jung, Min-Sung Kim, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang-Sik Yu, Jin-Cheon Kim
    Cancers.2021; 13(14): 3502.     CrossRef
  • Comparison between Local Excision and Radical Resection for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer in ypT0-1 Patients: An Analysis of the Clinicopathological Factors and Survival Rates
    Soo Young Oh, In Ja Park, Young IL Kim, Jong-Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Cancers.2021; 13(19): 4823.     CrossRef
  • Shifting Treatment Strategies to Prevent Early Relapse of Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Eun Jung Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2020; 36(6): 357.     CrossRef
Case Report
Benign proctology
Combined Fistulotomy and Contralateral Anal Internal Sphincterotomy for Recurrent and Complex Anal Fistula to Prevent Recurrence
Adeodatus Yuda Handaya, Aditya Rifqi Fauzi
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(2):122-127.   Published online March 17, 2020
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.11.19
  • 7,544 View
  • 164 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
The ideal intervention in the treatment of perianal fistula prevents the onset of infection to speed healing and prevent fistula recurrence while maintaining the function of the anal sphincter. Currently, there is no consensus on the best recommended surgical technique for perianal fistula management. Several studies have shown that fistulotomy was an easy and safe procedure for treatment of perianal fistula. Lateral internal sphincterotomy is the usual procedure performed on an anal fissure to decrease the anal sphincter tone. This study reports a combination of fistulotomy and contralateral internal sphincterotomy procedures for recurrent and complex perianal fistula to prevent recurrence. Here, we report 5 cases of recurrent and complex perianal fistula. The combination of fistulotomy and contralateral internal sphincterotomy is a relatively easy and safe procedure for complex perianal fistulae. In our cases, we found neither recurrence nor postoperative anal incontinence.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Modified anal sphincter suspension improves anal function in patients with anal fistula
    Peng Chen
    American Journal of Translational Research.2024; 16(9): 4858.     CrossRef
  • Ligation of Intersphincteric Fistulous Tract vs Endorectal Advancement Flap for High-Type Fistula in Ano: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Pankaj Kumar, Siddhant Sarthak, Pradeep K Singh, Tushar S Mishra, Prakash K Sasmal
    Journal of the American College of Surgeons.2023; 236(1): 27.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of loose combined cutting seton and traditional cutting seton for high anal fistula: a meta-analysis
    Yi SUN, Chunqiang WANG, Tianye HUANG, Xuebing WANG
    Gazzetta Medica Italiana Archivio per le Scienze Mediche.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
Review
A Review of the Role of Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Clinical Practice
Claire Hall, Louise Clarke, Atanu Pal, Pamela Buchwald, Tim Eglinton, Chris Wakeman, Frank Frizelle
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(6):294-305.   Published online December 31, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.11.13
  • 28,905 View
  • 540 Download
  • 171 Web of Science
  • 175 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) is not normally produced in significant quantities after birth but is elevated in colorectal cancer. The aim of this review was to define the current role of CEA and how best to investigate patients with elevated CEA levels. A systematic review of CEA was performed, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Studies were identified from PubMed, Cochrane library, and controlled trials registers. We identified 2,712 papers of which 34 were relevant. Analysis of these papers found higher preoperative CEA levels were associated with advanced or metastatic disease and thus poorer prognosis. Postoperatively, failure of CEA to return to normal was found to be indicative of residual or recurrent disease. However, measurement of CEA levels alone was not sufficient to improve survival rates. Two algorithms are proposed to guide investigation of patients with elevated CEA: one for patients with elevated CEA after CRC resection, and another for patients with de novo elevated CEA. CEA measurement has an important role in the investigation, management and follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Impedimetric detection of carcinoembryonic antigen using a pencil-graphite electrode integrated into a 3D-Printed electrochemical cell
    Sevda Akay Sazaklioglu, Emine Yıldırım, Uğur Tamer, Hüseyin Çelikkan
    Talanta.2026; 297: 128662.     CrossRef
  • Design and optimization of a high-sensitivity symmetric BP/WS2-based surface plasmon resonance biosensor: A theoretical study for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) detection
    Fatemeh Aghanezhad Aghchehkohal, Hamid Bahador, Hamid Heidarzadeh, Azadeh Nilghaz
    Physica B: Condensed Matter.2026; 720: 418024.     CrossRef
  • A fluorescent platform integrated with a “one-pot” nicking endonuclease signal amplification and magnetic separation for simultaneous detection of tumor markers
    Miaomiao Liu, Lie Liu, Mengsi Du, Qilong Li, Shiqi Wu, Shengxiang Su, Ningge Jian, Yongjun Wu, Yilin Wang
    Talanta.2025; 282: 127011.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and CA 19-9 levels in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer treated with a self-expandable metallic stent and curative surgery
    Ryuichiro Sato, Masaya Oikawa, Tetsuya Kakita, Tomoya Abe, Naoya Akazawa, Haruka Okano, Kei Ito, Takashi Tsuchiya
    Surgery Today.2025; 55(5): 618.     CrossRef
  • CAR-T cell therapy for breast cancer: Current status and future perspective
    Giuseppe Buono, Monica Capozzi, Roberta Caputo, Vincenzo Di Lauro, Daniela Cianniello, Michela Piezzo, Stefania Cocco, Claudia Martinelli, Annarita Verrazzo, Margherita Tafuro, Claudia Calderaio, Alessandra Calabrese, Francesco Nuzzo, Martina Pagliuca, Mi
    Cancer Treatment Reviews.2025; 133: 102868.     CrossRef
  • A promising role of noble metal NPs@MOFs in chondrosarcoma management
    Ziheng Huang, Keyue Tian, Yiyuan Xue, Feng Luo
    Nanoscale.2025; 17(6): 2961.     CrossRef
  • Electrochemical biosensor based on composite of gold nanoparticle/reduced-graphene oxide/graphitic carbon nitride and a caprolactone polymer for highly sensitive detection of CEA
    Yunpeng Li, Xia Wang, Xinling Wang, Zhe Qin, Chong Li, Jing Yang, Mengmeng Cao
    Bioelectrochemistry.2025; 163: 108897.     CrossRef
  • Advances and challenges of metal-organic frameworks in the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer
    Min Ye, Yingqi Lu, Peiyan Zou, Luyi Zhou, Govindhan Maduraiveeran, Yong Huang, Yanqiong Peng
    Materials Today Chemistry.2025; 43: 102517.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen as a Predictor of 5-Year Survival in Rectal Cancer: Proposing a New Prognostic Cutoff
    Amir Keshvari, Seyed Mohsen Ahmadi Tafti, Mohammad Reza Keramati, Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli, Alireza Kazemeini, Behnam Behboudi, Reza Akbari Asbagh, Anahita Mirzasadeghi
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Klinefelter Syndrome Sans Malignancy with Unusually Elevated Levels of CEA: A Case Report
    Xinxin Wo, Xiaoyan Yu, Lingling Miao, Yushan Mao, Keke Tang
    Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity.2025; Volume 18: 233.     CrossRef
  • Nanomaterial-based biosensors for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) detection: principles, applications, and perspectives: A review
    Siyuan Zhao, Yuxi Zhang, Yafang Wu, Yinglin Wang, Dezhi Li, Qing Liu
    Microchemical Journal.2025; 210: 112992.     CrossRef
  • Advancing Immunotherapy in Pancreatic Cancer: A Brief Review of Emerging Adoptive Cell Therapies
    Deepak Sherpally, Ashish Manne
    Cancers.2025; 17(4): 589.     CrossRef
  • Assessing the diagnostic value of oncological biomarkers for identifying primary malignancies in skeletal metastatic disease
    Sanna Matilainen, Hanna Liikanen, Riitta Lassila, Minna K. Laitinen
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2025; 51(6): 109688.     CrossRef
  • A novel photocleavable amino-modified graphene for covalent purification of N-glycans from hepatocellular carcinoma patients’ serum for potential biomarkers discovery
    Xuyuan Chao, Shengjie Yang, Baoying Zhang, Xin Zang, Jingyi Zhang, Xizi Liu, Lu Chen, Lu Qi, Xiaofeng Xue, Han Hu, Xinghe Wang
    Cancer Nanotechnology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • On‐Paper Enzyme‐Linked and Metal‐Linked Immunosorbent Assays for Low‐Cost Decentralized Testing of Carcinoembryonic Antigen
    Electra Mermiga, Varvara Pagkali, Dionysios Soulis, Christos Kokkinos, Anastasios Economou
    Analysis & Sensing.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Circulating Biomarkers of Thyroid Cancer: An Appraisal
    Marta Codrich, Alessia Biasotto, Federica D’Aurizio
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(5): 1582.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic role of postoperative persistence of ctDNA molecular signature after liver resection for colorectal liver metastases: Preliminary results from a prospective study
    Roberto Montalti, Francesco Pepe, Gianluca Cassese, Gianluca Russo, Umberto Malapelle, Chiara Carlomagno, Mariano Cesare Giglio, Giacinto Falco, Mariantonietta Alagia, Giuseppe De Simone, Karen Geboes, Giancarlo Troncone, Roberto Ivan Troisi, Gianluca Rom
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2025; 51(6): 109706.     CrossRef
  • Fecal bacterial biomarkers and blood biochemical indicators as potential key factors in the development of colorectal cancer
    Ping Cai, Qingzhen Yang, Jiaqi Lu, Xiaoyu Dai, Jinbo Xiong, Nicholas Chia
    mSystems.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • CA19-9, CEA and PIVKA-Ⅱ as a novel panel of serum markers for diagnosis of pancreatic cancer
    Meifang Wang, Hongying Bu, Weijia Luo, Xi Zeng, Guodong Chen, Yingchun He, Deliang Cao
    Clinical Biochemistry.2025; 137: 110902.     CrossRef
  • Carbon dots: Review of recent applications and perspectives in bio-sensing and biomarker detection
    Xeniya Terzapulo, Aiym Kassenova, Alissa Loskutova, Rostislav Bukasov
    Sensing and Bio-Sensing Research.2025; 47: 100771.     CrossRef
  • Comparative analysis of alpha-fetoprotein, carbohydrate antigen 19-9, carcinoembryonic antigen, and prostate-specific antigen among conventional cigarette smokers, heated tobacco product users and quitters
    Dae-Hyun Kim, Seung-Wan Hong, Naeun Park
    Tobacco Induced Diseases.2025; 23(March): 1.     CrossRef
  • Exploring targets in oropharyngeal cancer – association with immune markers and AI‐scoring of B7‐H3 expression
    Jacklyn Liu, Helen Bewicke‐Copley, Shruti Patel, Oscar Emanuel, Nicholas Counsell, Shachi J. Sharma, Volker Schartinger, Oliver Siefer, Ulrike Wieland, Nora Würdemann, Rocio Garcia‐Marin, Jozsef Dudas, Dominic Patel, David Allen, Naomi Guppy, Josep Linare
    Clinical and Translational Medicine.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic value of peripheral blood inflammatory indices for clinicopathological profile of colorectal cancer: a retrospective observational study
    Mohammad Rezazadeh, Amirreza Kamyabi, Ramtin Ghamkhari Pisheh, Sahar Noroozie, Bahareh Shateri Amiri, Alireza Negahi, Hanieh Radkhah
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Electrochemical detection of circulating-free DNA methylation: A new indicator for early cancer screening
    Han Peng, Liyue Sun, Jie Zhao, Guofeng Cui
    Talanta.2025; 292: 127925.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Value of Serum sTim-3, CEA, CA15-3 for Postoperative Recurrence of Breast Cancer
    Ting Shen, Hongming Fang, Jialong Wu, Yuan Qin, Xiumei Zhou, Xueqin Zhao, Biao Huang, Haiyan Gao
    Cancer Management and Research.2025; Volume 17: 517.     CrossRef
  • Survival analysis and prediction of early-onset colorectal cancer patients post-chemotherapy: an analysis based on the SEER database
    Zhiguo Tang, Guojia Zhou, Yu Xu, Yinxu Zhang
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The coadministration of Lactobacillus probiotic augments the antitumor effect of telmisartan in rats
    Ahmed M. El-Baz, Amany A. El-Mahmoudy, Sameh Saber, Marwa T. ElRakaiby
    AMB Express.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • TsRNA-49–73-Glu-CTC: A promising serum biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer
    Chenyu Li, Shenjie Zhong, Juan Chen, Xiaofeng Mu, Jun Hyeok Lim
    PLOS ONE.2025; 20(3): e0320187.     CrossRef
  • A microfluidic electrochemical immunosensor for detection of CEA and Ki67 in 3D tumor spheroids
    Sujin Kim, Seonyeop Kim, Chanjin Ko, Wonseok Lee, Hwan Drew Kim
    Materials Today Bio.2025; 32: 101768.     CrossRef
  • Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Elevation in Routine Screening Unveils Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma
    Farha Munira Mohamed Kamel, Noor Azimah Muhammad, Amir Zharif Adenan
    Cureus.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Detection of Cancer Biomarkers: Review of Methods and Applications Reported from Analytical Perspective
    Xeniya Terzapulo, Aigerim Dyussupova, Aisha Ilyas, Aigerim Boranova, Yegor Shevchenko, Saule Mergenbayeva, Olena Filchakova, Abduzhappar Gaipov, Rostislav Bukasov
    Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry.2025; : 1.     CrossRef
  • Enhanced Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer via Blood Biomarker Combinations Identified Through Extracellular Vesicle Isolation and Artificial Intelligence Analysis
    Bonhan Koo, Young Il Kim, Minju Lee, Seok‐Byung Lim, Yong Shin
    Journal of Extracellular Vesicles.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA): Origin, Role in Oncology, and Concentrations in Serum and Peritoneal Fluid
    Julia Niedzielska, Tomasz Jastrzębski
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2025; 14(9): 3189.     CrossRef
  • Kaempferol as a potent sensitizer for 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) to boost therapeutic index in colorectal cancer therapy
    Abhilasha Sharma, Anshu Thakur, Mehul R. Chorawala, Rakesh M. Rawal, Neeta Shrivastava
    Food Bioscience.2025; 69: 106973.     CrossRef
  • Advances in the roles and molecular mechanisms of exosomal circular RNAs in regulating the pre-metastatic niche of tumors
    Wei Xu, Luyu Zhu, Shiqi Zhang, Xiaoyan Wang, Dandan Gong, Yu Fan
    Discover Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Paper-based quantum dot-linked immunosorbent assay of carcinoembryonic antigen with dual fluorescence/electrochemical detection
    Electra Mermiga, Varvara Pagkali, Christos Kokkinos, Anastasios Economou
    Electrochimica Acta.2025; 530: 146393.     CrossRef
  • Research progress of microfluidic chip for detecting tumor protein biomarkers in blood tests
    Zhaoyi Feng, Yafang Wu, Yinglin Wang, Ye Zhang, Lei Zhang, Dezhi Li, Qing Liu
    Microchemical Journal.2025; 214: 114113.     CrossRef
  • Development of a Surface Plasmon Resonance Sensor Based MXene ($${mathbf{T}mathbf{i}}_{3}{mathbf{C}}_{2}{mathbf{T}}_{mathbf{x}}$$) for the Detection of Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA)
    Ali Khodaie, Hamid Bahador, Hamid Heidarzadeh
    Plasmonics.2025; 20(8): 5867.     CrossRef
  • Consensus Statements for Clinical Practice in Advanced/Metastatic Colorectal Cancers in India Using a Modified Delphi Method
    Anant Ramaswamy, Sujay Srinivas, Viraj Lavingia, Mounika Boppana, Chakor Vora, Randeep Singh, M. Vamshi Krishna, Amish Vora, Sujith Kumar Mullapally, Prabhat Bhargava, Vinayak Maka, Gautam Goyal, Vivek Agarwala, Ashay Karpe, Jimmy Mirani, S Krupa Shankar,
    South Asian Journal of Cancer.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Medullary Thyroid Cancer Discovered Through Elevated Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels Post Colorectal Cancer Resection
    Andrew Glaza, Jeffrey Margolis
    Annals of Internal Medicine: Clinical Cases.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Postoperative metastatic Krukenberg tumors with ARID1A and KRAS mutations in a patient with gastric cancer treated with oxaliplatin and tegafur: A case report
    Jie Wu, Suzhen Jiang, Qingling Shen, Hongxia Gong
    Oncology Letters.2025; 29(6): 1.     CrossRef
  • A Wearable In‐Pad Diagnostic for the Detection of Disease Biomarkers in Menstruation Blood
    Lucas Dosnon, Thomas Rduch, Charlotte Meyer, Inge K. Herrmann
    Advanced Science.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Novel tumor marker index combining carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9: New prognostic factor for metastatic colorectal cancer
    Yusuf Ilhan, Onur Yazdan Balcik, Halil Goksel Guzel, Arif Hakan Onder, Bilgin Demir, Mehmet Nuri Baser, Ibrahim Karadag, Mehmet Fatih Ozbay, Tugrul Burak Genc, Sahnura Uzuntas, Oguz Poyrazoglu, Ismail Beypinar, Yakup Ergun, Banu Ozturk
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • CEA-Functionalized Gold Nanoparticles as a Nanovaccine Platform: In Vitro Evaluation of Cytocompatibility, Cellular Uptake, and Antigen Processing
    Razvan-Septimiu Zdrehus, Teodora Mocan, Lavinia Ioana Sabau, Cristian Tudor Matea, Flaviu Tăbăran, Teodora Pop, Cristian Delcea, Ofelia Mosteanu, Lucian Mocan
    Vaccines.2025; 13(7): 668.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of Serum Calcium, Vitamin D, Vitamin E, and CEA Levels in Patients with Colorectal Cancer
    Husam H. Hasan
    Medical Journal of Babylon.2025; 22(Suppl 1): S37.     CrossRef
  • Liquid biopsy in breast cancer: Redefining precision medicine
    Maria Luisa Schiavone, Rosa Scarpitta, Francesco Ravera, Sara Bleve, Carolina Reduzzi, Federico Di Cocco, Martina Dameri, Gabriele Zoppoli, Antonio Giuseppe Naccarato, Pier Vitale Nuzzo, Massimo Cristofanilli, Giuseppe Nicolò Fanelli, Cristian Scatena
    The Journal of Liquid Biopsy.2025; 9: 100312.     CrossRef
  • Association of Serum PSA, fPSA, and CEA Levels with Prognosis and Clinicopathological Characteristics in Prostate Cancer
    Yeasin Ahamed, Lichao Wu, Shantanu Baral, Ashab Uddin Al-Raiyan, Weigui Sun
    Cancer Management and Research.2025; Volume 17: 1577.     CrossRef
  • The effect of carcinoembryonic antigen on cytokine production in breast cancer patients
    A. A. Studenikina, S. L. Ryzhikova, A. V. Proskura, A. I. Autenshlyus
    Meditsinskiy sovet = Medical Council.2025; (10): 128.     CrossRef
  • An analysis of the current perspective and review regarding bone metastasis in colorectal adenocarcinoma
    Budhi Ida Bagus, Hanis Setyono, Suwardi, Wibisono
    International Surgery Journal.2025; 12(9): 1590.     CrossRef
  • Graphene-based LSPR sensors enable polarization-independent detection of CEA antigens
    Yousef Rafighirani, Hamid Bahador, Javad Javidan
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Case of Spontaneous Regression of Primary Tumor after Adrenalectomy for Primary Lung Cancer with Synchronous Adrenal Metastasis
    Hisaya Chikaraishi, Ryu Kanzaki, Hironobu Samejima, Masao Kobayashi, Julian Horiguchi, Tomohiro Maniwa, Hidetoshi Satomi, Keiichiro Honma, Jiro Okami
    Surgical Case Reports.2025; 11(1): n/a.     CrossRef
  • Relationship between MRI imaging characteristics and serum markers CEA, CA199, CA125 levels in ovarian cancer patients
    X. Lu, S. Xie, D. Mou, M. Peng
    International Journal of Radiation Research.2025; 23(3): 513.     CrossRef
  • Association between insulin resistance biomarkers and metastatic prognosis in treatment-naïve colorectal cancer patients: a pilot study
    M. P. Narayanan, Amit Sehrawat, Bela Goyal, Parmod Kumar, Shashank Bansal, Satyanker Gupta, Amit Gupta, Anissa A. Mirza, Deepak Sundriyal, Sweety Gupta
    BMC Cancer.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Identification and predictive machine learning model construction of gut microbiota associated with carcinoembryonic antigens in colorectal cancer
    Yongzhi Wu, Zigui Huang, Yongqi Huang, Chuanbin Chen, Mingjian Qin, Zhen Wang, Fuhai He, Shenghai Liu, Rumao Zhong, Jun Liu, Chenyan Long, Jungang Liu, Xiaoliang Huang, Gustavo Arrizabalaga
    mSphere.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Association between elevated pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen levels and survival in younger patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–based study
    Matthew Bilotti, Sameh Hany Emile, Anjelli Wignakumar, Cameron Perrone, Spencer Barnes, Steven D. Wexner
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025; 29(11): 102228.     CrossRef
  • The use of complex radionuclide methods in the detection of metastatic lesions of the skeleton and liver in kidney cancer
    Yehor Lazar, Danylo Yevdoshenko, Anastasiya Mazur, Olena Mіronova , Нanna Romanenko, Anatoly Makarenko
    The Ukrainian Scientific Medical Youth Journal.2025; 157(3): 89.     CrossRef
  • A real-world pharmacovigilance assessment of drug-related carcinoembryonic antigen increase
    Chao Du, Yunwei Liang, Weining Liu, Yanping Jiang, Ying Wang
    Medicine.2025; 104(37): e44365.     CrossRef
  • The sensitive and selective electrochemical detection of carcinoembryonic antigen using a nanoMIPs-aptamer sandwich assay
    Chutimon Akkapinyo, Yingyot Poo-arporn, Ramida Rattanakam, Kittitat Subannajui, Peter A. Lieberzeit, Peter Wolschann, Rungtiva P. Poo-arporn
    Scientific Reports.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Emerging Role of Long Non-coding RNA 01296 in Human Malignancies
    Lei Luo, Fan Yang, Xiaoping Fu, Tingting Yu, Wenqian Tang, Juan Xue
    Current Molecular Medicine.2025; 25(8): 1010.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Prognostic Significance of CEA and CA15-3 in Breast Cancer
    Riham Mohammad Aljouji, Dr. Issa Radwan Yusuf, Dr. Rama Hussein Ibrahim
    International Journal of Advanced Pharmaceutical Sciences and Research.2025; 5(6): 30.     CrossRef
  • Next-Generation Biosensors for Cancer Biomarker Detection: A Comparative Analysis of Optical, Electrochemical, Piezoelectric, and Nanotechnology-Driven Platforms
    Thatha Himabindu, Vasimalla Yesudasu, Santosh Kumar
    IEEE Sensors Reviews.2025; 2: 619.     CrossRef
  • Targeted Therapies in the Most Common Advanced Solid Tumors, Drug Resistance, and Counteracting Progressive Micrometastatic Disease: The Next Frontier of Research
    Andrea Nicolini, Paola Ferrari, Roberto Silvestri, Dario A. Bini
    MedComm.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Determination of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) by surface plasmon resonance-enhanced total internal reflection ellipsometry (SPRe-TIRE)
    Aslı Erkal-Aytemur, Samet Şahin, Zafer Üstündağ, İbrahim Ender Mülazımoğlu, Mustafa Oguzhan Caglayan
    Instrumentation Science & Technology.2024; 52(2): 203.     CrossRef
  • Peptide absent sequences emerging in human cancers
    Georgios Christos Tsiatsianis, Candace S.Y. Chan, Ioannis Mouratidis, Nikol Chantzi, Anna Maria Tsiatsiani, Nelson S. Yee, Apostolos Zaravinos, Verena Kantere, Ilias Georgakopoulos-Soares
    European Journal of Cancer.2024; 196: 113421.     CrossRef
  • Electrochemical nanobiosensors for the detection of cancer biomarkers in real samples: Trends and challenges
    Fethi Achi, Aisha M. Attar, Abdellatif Ait Lahcen
    TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry.2024; 170: 117423.     CrossRef
  • Biosensor-Based Nanodiagnosis of Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA): an Approach to Classification and Precise Detection of Cancer Biomarker
    Maryam Hariri, Vahid Alivirdiloo, Nastaran Safavi Ardabili, Sarah Gholami, Sajjad Masoumi, Mohammad Reza Mehraban, Mahsa Alem, Reza Shah Hosseini, Ahmad Mobed, Farhood Ghazi, Iraj Alipourfard
    BioNanoScience.2024; 14(1): 429.     CrossRef
  • Circulating Tumour Cells in the Prediction of Bone Metastasis
    Siu-Wai Choi, Aria Kaiyuan Sun, Jason Pui-Yin Cheung, Jemmi Ching-Ying Ho
    Cancers.2024; 16(2): 252.     CrossRef
  • Next-Generation CEA-CAR-NK-92 Cells against Solid Tumors: Overcoming Tumor Microenvironment Challenges in Colorectal Cancer
    Alexander Sebastian Franzén, Abdelhadi Boulifa, Clarissa Radecke, Sebastian Stintzing, Martin J. Raftery, Gabriele Pecher
    Cancers.2024; 16(2): 388.     CrossRef
  • Normal CEA Levels After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Cytoreduction with Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemoperfusion Predict Improved Survival from Colorectal Peritoneal Metastases
    Michael M. Wach, Geoffrey Nunns, Ahmed Hamed, Joshua Derby, Mark Jelinek, Curtis Tatsuoka, Matthew P. Holtzman, Amer H. Zureikat, David L. Bartlett, Steven A. Ahrendt, James F. Pingpank, M. Haroon A. Choudry, Melanie Ongchin
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(4): 2391.     CrossRef
  • Electrochemically Synthesized MIP Sensors: Applications in Healthcare Diagnostics
    Akinrinade George Ayankojo, Jekaterina Reut, Vitali Syritski
    Biosensors.2024; 14(2): 71.     CrossRef
  • Optical fiber sensing probe for detecting a carcinoembryonic antigen using a composite sensitive film of PAN nanofiber membrane and gold nanomembrane
    Jinze Li, Xin Liu, Hao Sun, Jiawei Xi, Chen Chang, Li Deng, Yanxin Yang, Xiang Li
    Optics Express.2024; 32(11): 20024.     CrossRef
  • DNAzyme-based ultrasensitive immunoassay: Recent advances and emerging trends
    Meng Wang, Zhe Liu, Chang Liu, Wanghong He, Dui Qin, Minli You
    Biosensors and Bioelectronics.2024; 251: 116122.     CrossRef
  • Predictive modeling algorithms for liver metastasis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review of the current literature
    Isaac Seow-En, Ye Xin Koh, Yun Zhao, Boon Hwee Ang, Ivan En-Howe Tan, Aik Yong Chok, Emile John Kwong Wei Tan, Marianne Kit Har Au
    Annals of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.2024; 28(1): 14.     CrossRef
  • Realizing the label-free sensitive detection of carcinoembryogenic antigen (CEA) in blood serum via a MNC-decorated flexible immunosensor
    Daisy Mehta, Sukhjot Kaur, Tharamani C. Nagaiah
    Analytical Methods.2024; 16(10): 1473.     CrossRef
  • Postbiotic butyrate: role and its effects for being a potential drug and biomarker to pancreatic cancer
    Abinaya Elango, Vineeta Debbie Nesam, Padmaja Sukumar, Infancia Lawrence, Arunkumar Radhakrishnan
    Archives of Microbiology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Classifying Raman Spectra of Colon Cells Based on Machine Learning Algorithms
    Maria Lasalvia, Crescenzio Gallo, Vito Capozzi, Giuseppe Perna
    Photonics.2024; 11(3): 275.     CrossRef
  • Electrochemical immunosensing of tumor markers
    Venkata Narayana Palakollu, Y. Veera Manohara Reddy, Mehdihasan I. Shekh, S.V. Prabhakar Vattikuti, Jaesool Shim, Rajshekhar Karpoormath
    Clinica Chimica Acta.2024; 557: 117882.     CrossRef
  • Improving CEA detection Sensitivity: Carboxyfluorescein-Loaded liposomes in aptamer sandwich assay
    Mohamed Aimene Benariba, Kanza Hannachi, Yuting Zhang, Xiaoli Wang, Nandi Zhou
    Microchemical Journal.2024; 200: 110463.     CrossRef
  • Targeted Biodegradable Near-Infrared Fluorescent Nanoparticles for Colorectal Cancer Imaging
    Seock-Jin Chung, Kay Hadrick, Md Nafiujjaman, Ehsanul Hoque Apu, Meghan L. Hill, Md Nurunnabi, Christopher H. Contag, Taeho Kim
    ACS Applied Bio Materials.2024; 7(12): 7861.     CrossRef
  • Use of tumor markers in distinguishing lung adenocarcinoma-associated malignant pleural effusion from tuberculous pleural effusion
    Ling Ai, Wenjun Wang, Jingyuan Li, Ting Ye, Yuying Li
    The American Journal of the Medical Sciences.2024; 368(2): 136.     CrossRef
  • Carcinoembryonic antigen in the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of focal liver lesions
    Osman Nuri Dilek, Dilara İrem Arslan Kahraman, Gökhan Kahraman
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(4): 999.     CrossRef
  • Complex Presentation of Lung Cancer with Obstructive Jaundice
    Ruxandra Oprita, Bogdan Oprita, Ioana Adriana Serban, Lidia Aurelia Stefan, Ciprian Mihai Neacsu, Alice Elena Diaconu, Valentin Enache
    Reports.2024; 7(2): 30.     CrossRef
  • A simplified lateral flow immunosensor for the assay of carcinoembryonic antigen in low-resource settings
    Ioanna Tsogka, Electra Mermiga, Varvara Pagkali, Christos Kokkinos, Anastasios Economou
    Analytical Methods.2024; 16(18): 2921.     CrossRef
  • Relevance of glyco-biomakers and glycan profiles in cancer stem cells
    Rohit Pujari, Shiv Kumar Dubey
    Glycobiology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Prognostic prediction model of colorectal cancer based on preoperative serum tumor markers
    Yu-Hang Diao, Si-Qi Rao, Xin-Peng Shu, Yong Cheng, Can Tan, Li-Juan Wang, Dong Peng
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(5): 1344.     CrossRef
  • Label-free electrochemical biosensor based on dual amplification of gold nanoparticles and polycaprolactones for CEA detection
    Xia Wang, Zhe Qin, Fei Zhang, Chong Li, Xianxian Yuan, Jing Yang, Huaixia Yang
    Talanta.2024; 278: 126468.     CrossRef
  • Biotin-functionalized nanoparticles: an overview of recent trends in cancer detection
    Sonia Fathi-karkan, Saman Sargazi, Shirin Shojaei, Bahareh Farasati Far, Shekoufeh Mirinejad, Marco Cordani, Arezoo Khosravi, Ali Zarrabi, Saeid Ghavami
    Nanoscale.2024; 16(27): 12750.     CrossRef
  • Mortality rate and predictors of colorectal cancer patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zewdu Bishaw Aynalem, Abebaw Bires Adal, Temesgien Fentahun Ayele, Gashaw Melkie Bayeh, Almaw Genet Yeshiwas, Tadesse Miretie Dessie, Tilahun Degu Tsega
    BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Opto-electrochemical transducers for molecular sensing utilizing nanozyme-based sensing technologies
    Indrani Nandi, Vinay Patel, Rohit Srivastava, Pranjal Chandra
    Microchemical Journal.2024; 205: 111360.     CrossRef
  • Five-Segment THz Refractive Index Metamaterial Biosensor With Perfect Absorption for Carcinoembryonic Antigen Measurement
    Hamid Bahador
    IEEE Sensors Journal.2024; 24(16): 25715.     CrossRef
  • Near-infrared light-enhanced colorimetric signal amplification strategy for tumor marker detection based on MoS2/CuO/Au nanocomposite
    Jiawang Xiang, Bing Zhang, Yuan Yuan, Zhihuan Zhao, Jianying Lin, Jing Li
    Microchimica Acta.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Development and validation of a novel combinational index of liquid biopsy biomarker for longitudinal lung cancer patient management
    Min-Yi Liao, Yun-Jie Hao, Ching-Shan Luo, Ching-Mei Chen, Po-Hao Feng, Hsin-Yu Yang, Da-Jeng Yao, Kang-Yun Lee, Fan-Gang Tseng
    The Journal of Liquid Biopsy.2024; 6: 100167.     CrossRef
  • The AC010247.2/miR-125b-5p axis triggers the malignant progression of acute myelocytic leukemia by IL-6R
    Fang Xie, Jialu Xu, Lina Yan, Xia Xiao, Liang Liu
    Heliyon.2024; 10(18): e37715.     CrossRef
  • Biofilm mediated integrin activation and directing acceleration of colorectal cancer
    Vaijayanthi Saravanan, Vinoj Gopalakrishnan, Maria Infant Majula Shifani Mahendran, Rajan Vaithianathan, Sowmya Srinivasan, Vinoth Boopathy, SriKrishna Krishnamurthy
    APMIS.2024; 132(10): 688.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the clinical efficacy of dienogest and drospirone/ethinyl estradiol in the treatment of ovarian endometriosis cysts
    Qian Xiao, Liwei Hong, Chun Li, Sijie Hong, Yunsong Li, Dingding Yu, Hongli Liu
    Journal of Endometriosis and Pelvic Pain Disorders.2024; 16(3-4): 134.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances in surface plasmon resonance for the detection of ovarian cancer biomarkers: a thorough review
    Shahnam Valizadeh Shahbazlou, Somayeh Vandghanooni, Bahareh Dabirmanesh, Morteza Eskandani, Sadegh Hasannia
    Microchimica Acta.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Expression of regulatory T cells in driver-gene-negative advanced non-small cell lung cancer as well as its effect on the therapeutic efficacy and prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitors
    Y. Chen, S. Chen, Y. Li, X. Guo, Q. Liang, L. Yang, C. Lei
    International Journal of Radiation Research.2024; 22(2): 455.     CrossRef
  • Glycosylation in cancer as a source of biomarkers
    Sara Khorami-Sarvestani, Samir M. Hanash, Johannes F. Fahrmann, Ricardo A. León-Letelier, Hiroyuki Katayama
    Expert Review of Proteomics.2024; 21(9-10): 345.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic value of joint detection of serum tumor markers in different pathological types of lung cancer
    W. Liu, D. Zang
    International Journal of Radiation Research.2024; 22(2): 315.     CrossRef
  • Dual metal–organic-frameworks mediated resonance energy transfer for ultrasensitive electrochemiluminescence immunosensing
    Chun Wang, Gaoxing Cheng, Guixin Li, Jianbo Liu
    Microchimica Acta.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Advancements in colorectal cancer detection: The role of immuno‐positron emission tomography, immuno‐single‐photon emission computed tomography, and machine learning applications
    Surui Chen, Xiumin Shi, Shu Liu, Pei Pei, Kai Yang, Lin Hu
    Journal of Intelligent Medicine.2024; 1(1): 63.     CrossRef
  • Emerging roles of long non-coding RNA FOXP4-AS1 in human cancers: From molecular biology to clinical application
    Jingjie Yang
    Heliyon.2024; 10(21): e39857.     CrossRef
  • Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer: Actual and Future Perspectives
    Horia-Dan Lișcu, Nicolae Verga, Dimitrie-Ionuț Atasiei, Dumitru-Cristinel Badiu, Adrian Vasile Dumitru, Flavia Ultimescu, Christopher Pavel, Roxana-Elena Stefan, Diandra-Carmen Manole, Andreea-Iuliana Ionescu
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2024; 25(21): 11535.     CrossRef
  • Grading carcinoembryonic antigen levels can enhance the effectiveness of prognostic stratification in patients with colorectal cancer: a single-centre retrospective study
    Hailun Xie, Lishuang Wei, Qiwen Wang, Shuangyi Tang, Jialiang Gan
    BMJ Open.2024; 14(10): e084219.     CrossRef
  • Establishment and validation of a nomogram model for early diagnosis of gastric cancer: a large-scale cohort study
    Haiyu Wang, Yumin Ding, Shujing Zhao, Kaixu Li, Dehong Li
    Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Gasdermin D (GSDM D) as a Potential Diagnostic Biomarker in Bladder Cancer: New Perspectives in Detection
    Monika Gudowska-Sawczuk, Sara Pączek, Michał Olkowicz, Jacek Kudelski, Barbara Mroczko
    Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4213.     CrossRef
  • The Past, Present, and Future of Biomarkers for the Early Diagnosis of Pancreatic Cancer
    Federica Vitale, Lorenzo Zileri Dal Verme, Mattia Paratore, Marcantonio Negri, Enrico Celestino Nista, Maria Elena Ainora, Giorgio Esposto, Irene Mignini, Raffaele Borriello, Linda Galasso, Sergio Alfieri, Antonio Gasbarrini, Maria Assunta Zocco, Alberto
    Biomedicines.2024; 12(12): 2840.     CrossRef
  • Elevated CA19-9 within the normal range suggests poorer prognosis in stage II CRC: A retrospective analysis of a large sample in a single center
    Ruoxin Zhang, Fan Chen, Junyong Weng, Zilan Ye, Xinxiang Li
    Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.2024; 20(7): 2013.     CrossRef
  • Serum cytokines in astrocytic brain tumors: a prospective study
    Tariq Ansari, Gautam Dutta, Arvind Kumar Srivastava, Anita Jagetia, Daljit Singh, Hukum Singh, Rohit Bharti, Anand Prakash, Anil Kumar
    British Journal of Neurosurgery.2023; 37(1): 35.     CrossRef
  • Recent advancement in sensitive detection of carcinoembryonic antigen using nanomaterials based immunosensors
    Bazilah Awang Abd Manaf, Shyang Pei Hong, Mohammad Rizwan, Fareeha Arshad, Christopher Gwenin, Minhaz Uddin Ahmed
    Surfaces and Interfaces.2023; 36: 102596.     CrossRef
  • A nomogram diagnostic prediction model of pancreatic metastases of small cell lung carcinoma based on clinical characteristics, radiological features and biomarkers
    Jian-Xia Xu, Jin-Bao Hu, Xiao-Yan Yang, Na Feng, Xiao-Shan Huang, Xiao-Zhong Zheng, Qin-Pan Rao, Yu-Guo Wei, Ri-Sheng Yu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The hidden potential of glycomarkers: Glycosylation studies in the service of cancer diagnosis and treatment
    Karolina Grzesik, Marcelina Janik, Dorota Hoja-Łukowicz
    Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer.2023; 1878(3): 188889.     CrossRef
  • Transient Changes in Serum CEA, CA19-9, CRP, YKL-40, and IL-6 during Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Survival of Patients with Colorectal Cancer
    Kaisa Lehtomäki, Eetu Heervä, Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, Harri Mustonen, Tapio Salminen, Heikki Joensuu, Kethe Hermunen, Mogens Karsbøl Boisen, Julia Sidenius Johansen, Caj Haglund, Pia Osterlund
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2023; 24(7): 6753.     CrossRef
  • Unexplained increase of serum carcinoembryonic antigen: don’t forget the thyroid!
    Filipe Miguel Montes de Jesus, Luca Giovanella
    Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM).2023; 61(10): e203.     CrossRef
  • The Clinical Significance of Serum Free Light Chains in Bladder Cancer
    Monika Gudowska-Sawczuk, Jacek Kudelski, Michał Olkowicz, Grzegorz Młynarczyk, Piotr Chłosta, Barbara Mroczko
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2023; 12(9): 3294.     CrossRef
  • Target selection and clinical chimeric antigen receptor T cell activity against solid tumors
    Eric von Hofe, Yanping Yang, Moonsoo M. Jin
    iLABMED.2023; 1(1): 29.     CrossRef
  • Sequence of colorectal and liver resection in patients with surgically-treatable stage IV colorectal cancer
    Calista Harbaugh, Aneel Damle
    Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2023; 34(3): 100969.     CrossRef
  • CXC ELR-Positive Chemokines as Diagnostic and Prognostic Markers for Breast Cancer Patients
    Joanna Motyka, Aleksandra Kicman, Monika Kulesza, Sławomir Ławicki
    Cancers.2023; 15(12): 3118.     CrossRef
  • Impedimetric aptasensor based on MOF based composite for measuring of carcinoembryonic antigen as a tumor biomarker
    Ping He, Qiang Zhang, Qiwei Liu
    Chemosphere.2023; 338: 139339.     CrossRef
  • Two-dimensional substrate assisted SERS immunosensor for accurate detection of carcinoembryonic antigen
    Dechan Lu, Cairou Chen, PeiPei Xu, Ruiyun You, Zhenzhen Lu, Yudong Lu
    Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy.2023; 302: 123142.     CrossRef
  • The Significance of CXCL1 and CXCR1 as Potential Biomarkers of Colorectal Cancer
    Marta Łukaszewicz-Zając, Monika Zajkowska, Sara Pączek, Agnieszka Kulczyńska-Przybik, Kamil Safiejko, Marcin Juchimiuk, Leszek Kozłowski, Barbara Mroczko
    Biomedicines.2023; 11(7): 1933.     CrossRef
  • New luminescent hydrophilic iridium(III) nanoflower at low potential for electrochemiluminescence immunosensing
    Li Song, Guangrong Kuang, Gui Zhang, Jiang Guo, Yingzi Fu
    Chemical Engineering Journal.2023; 472: 144923.     CrossRef
  • MOF-Based Biosensors for the Detection of Carcinoembryonic Antigen: A Concise Review
    May R. Ibrahim, Yaser E. Greish
    Molecules.2023; 28(16): 5970.     CrossRef
  • Proteomics-Driven Biomarkers in Pancreatic Cancer
    Luís Ramalhete, Emanuel Vigia, Rúben Araújo, Hugo Pinto Marques
    Proteomes.2023; 11(3): 24.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathologic Significance of Heat Shock Protein 60 as a Survival Predictor in Colorectal Cancer
    Myunghee Kang, Soyeon Jeong, Jungsuk An, Sungjin Park, Seungyoon Nam, Kwang An Kwon, Debashis Sahoo, Pradipta Ghosh, Jung Ho Kim
    Cancers.2023; 15(16): 4052.     CrossRef
  • Colorimetric immunoassay of carcinoembryonic antigen based on the glucose oxidase/MnO2 nanosheet cascade reaction with self-supplying oxygen
    Yuanzhi Yao, Jinhong Wang, Ziqi Wang, Shenghua Li, Hongliang Tan
    Analytical Methods.2023; 15(40): 5351.     CrossRef
  • Combined effect of serum carcinoembryonic antigen and hepatic steatosis on new-onset ischemic heart disease among middle-aged and older Korean adults: a cohort study
    Ji Won Kwak, Yong Jae Lee, Byoungjin Park, Dong Hyuk Jung
    Frontiers in Nutrition.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Digestive cancer surgery in low-mid income countries: analysis of postoperative mortality and complications in a single-center study
    Hamza Sekkat, Hassan Agouzoul, Zineb Loudyi, Jaouad Naddouri, Jihane El Hamzaoui, Samira El Fakir, Mohammed Omari, Youness Bakali, Mouna Mhamdi Alaoui, Mohammed Raiss, Abdelmalek Hrora, Farid Sabbah
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Exploring the Role of Biomarkers Associated with Alveolar Damage and Dysfunction in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis—A Systematic Review
    Alexandra-Simona Zamfir, Mihai Lucian Zabara, Raluca Ioana Arcana, Tudor Andrei Cernomaz, Andreea Zabara-Antal, Marius Traian Dragoș Marcu, Antigona Trofor, Carmen Lăcrămioara Zamfir, Radu Crișan-Dabija
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2023; 13(11): 1607.     CrossRef
  • CEA vaccines
    Anchit Bhagat, Herbert K. Lyerly, Michael A. Morse, Zachary C. Hartman
    Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Biomarkers in Cancer Detection, Diagnosis, and Prognosis
    Sreyashi Das, Mohan Kumar Dey, Ram Devireddy, Manas Ranjan Gartia
    Sensors.2023; 24(1): 37.     CrossRef
  • Disparities in post-operative surveillance testing for metastatic recurrence among colorectal cancer survivors
    Janeth I. Sanchez, Veena Shankaran, Joseph M. Unger, Margaret M. Madeleine, Noah Espinoza, Beti Thompson
    Journal of Cancer Survivorship.2022; 16(3): 638.     CrossRef
  • T‐cell surface generation of dual bivalent, bispecific T‐cell engaging, RNA duplex cross‐linked antibodies (dbBiTERs) for re‐directed tumor cell lysis
    Maciej Kujawski, Lin Li, Harry Li, Paul J. Yazaki, Piotr Swiderski, John E. Shively
    Biotechnology Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Application of Proteomics in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Biomarker Investigations: A Review
    Christina Jane Vellan, Jaime Jacqueline Jayapalan, Boon-Koon Yoong, Azlina Abdul-Aziz, Sarni Mat-Junit, Perumal Subramanian
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(4): 2093.     CrossRef
  • Biomarkers and Genetic Markers of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cholangiocarcinoma—What Do We Already Know
    Jacek Baj, Łukasz Bryliński, Filip Woliński, Michał Granat, Katarzyna Kostelecka, Piotr Duda, Jolanta Flieger, Grzegorz Teresiński, Grzegorz Buszewicz, Marzena Furtak-Niczyporuk, Piero Portincasa
    Cancers.2022; 14(6): 1493.     CrossRef
  • Preparation of a disposable electrochemiluminescence sensor chip based on an MXene-loaded ruthenium luminescent agent and its application in the detection of carcinoembryonic antigens
    Weiwei Luo, Zhuoxin Ye, Pinyi Ma, Qiong Wu, Daqian Song
    The Analyst.2022; 147(9): 1986.     CrossRef
  • Circulating Nucleic Acids as Novel Biomarkers for Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma
    Ryan McGowan, Áine Sally, Anthony McCabe, Brian Michael Moran, Karen Finn
    Cancers.2022; 14(8): 2027.     CrossRef
  • Recent Advances in Nanomaterial‐based Optical Biosensors as Potential Point‐of‐Care Testing (PoCT) Probes in Carcinoembryonic Antigen Detection
    Siew Suan Ng, Hooi Ling Lee, Pandian Bothi Raja, Ruey‐an Doong
    Chemistry – An Asian Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Carbon Material Hybrid Construction on an Aptasensor for Monitoring Surgical Tumors
    Renyuan Ma, Subash C. B. Gopinath, Thangavel Lakshmipriya, Yeng Chen, Larisa Lvova
    Journal of Analytical Methods in Chemistry.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • CEA-regulated Oncolytic Virus Anticancer Therapy: A Promising Strategy for Rare Solid Tumors
    Yuqi Yang, Shuhang Wang, Peiwen Ma, Qiyu Tang, Yandong Li, Yuan Fang, Qi Zhu, Wei Tao, Yan Zha, Ning Li
    Current Cancer Drug Targets.2022; 22(2): 126.     CrossRef
  • Nomogram for Predicting Occult Locally Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Before Surgery
    Zhixin Huang, Zhinuan Hong, Ling Chen, Mingqiang Kang
    Frontiers in Surgery.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predicting the benefit of stereotactic body radiotherapy of colorectal cancer metastases
    Sara Lindberg, Eva Onjukka, Peter Wersäll, Caroline Staff, Rolf Lewensohn, Giuseppe Masucci, Karin Lindberg
    Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology.2022; 36: 91.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic Value of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Changes Before and After Operation for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
    Zhinuan Hong, Zhixin Huang, Zhen Chen, Mingqiang Kang
    World Journal of Surgery.2022; 46(11): 2725.     CrossRef
  • Toxic metals in cement induced hematological and DNA damage as well as carcinogenesis in occupationally-Exposed block-factory workers in Lagos, Nigeria
    Tajudeen Yahaya, Esther Oladele, Titilola Salisu, Esther Orji, Zafira Zakari, Umar Usman Liman, Clement Boniface Gomo, Mustapha Abdullahi
    Egyptian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences.2022; 9(1): 499.     CrossRef
  • Identification of a Five-MiRNA Expression Assay to Aid Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis
    Matthew G. Davey, Gerard Feeney, Heidi Annuk, Maxwell Paganga, Emma Holian, Aoife J. Lowery, Michael J. Kerin, Nicola Miller
    Gastrointestinal Disorders.2022; 4(3): 190.     CrossRef
  • Label-Free Immunosensor Based on Polyaniline-Loaded MXene and Gold-Decorated β-Cyclodextrin for Efficient Detection of Carcinoembryonic Antigen
    Qi Wang, Huaqian Xin, Zhou Wang
    Biosensors.2022; 12(8): 657.     CrossRef
  • The tumor microenvironment of hepatocellular carcinoma and its targeting strategy by CAR-T cell immunotherapy
    Zhang Guizhen, Ji Guanchang, Liu Liwen, Wang Huifen, Ren Zhigang, Sun Ranran, Yu Zujiang
    Frontiers in Endocrinology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Increased Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) Level Is Highly Associated with Low Skeletal Muscle Mass in Asymptomatic Adults: A Population-Based Study
    Chul-Hyun Park, Antonio Diaz Lizarraga, Yong-Taek Lee, Kyung-Jae Yoon, Tae-Kyung Yoo
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2022; 11(17): 5009.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative albumin–bilirubin score as a prognostic indicator in patients with stage III colon cancer
    Hyun Gu Lee, Seok-Byung Lim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Jin Cheon Kim
    Scientific Reports.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A Novel, Quick, and Reliable Smartphone-Based Method for Serum PSA Quantification: Original Design of a Portable Microfluidic Immunosensor-Based System
    Francisco Gabriel Ortega, Germán E. Gómez, Coral González-Martinez, Teresa Valero, José Expósito-Hernández, Ignacio Puche, Alba Rodriguez-Martinez, María José Serrano, José Antonio Lorente, Martín A. Fernández-Baldo
    Cancers.2022; 14(18): 4483.     CrossRef
  • Microfluidics‐Based Urine Biopsy for Cancer Diagnosis: Recent Advances and Future Trends
    Yanping Wang, Yanfeng Gao, Yujun Song
    ChemMedChem.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma with a predominant HCC component: better survival and MRI-based prediction
    Yuyao Xiao, Xinde Zheng, Changwu Zhou, Peng Huang, Fei Wu, Chun Yang, Mengsu Zeng
    European Radiology.2022; 33(2): 1412.     CrossRef
  • The recent advancements in the early detection of cancer biomarkers by DNAzyme-assisted aptasensors
    Hossein Kamali, Shiva Golmohammadzadeh, Hamed Zare, Rahim Nosrati, Mohammad Fereidouni, Hossein Safarpour
    Journal of Nanobiotechnology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Indicative Value of Serum Tumor Markers for Metastasis and Stage of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Chunyang Jiang, Mengyao Zhao, Shaohui Hou, Xiaoli Hu, Jinchao Huang, Hongci Wang, Changhao Ren, Xiaoying Pan, Ti Zhang, Shengnan Wu, Shun Zhang, Bingsheng Sun
    Cancers.2022; 14(20): 5064.     CrossRef
  • Immunometabolic profiling of cervicovaginal lavages identifies key signatures associated with adenomyosis
    Georgia M. Lorentzen, Paweł Łaniewski, Haiyan Cui, Denise J. Roe, Jamal Mourad, Nichole D. Mahnert, Leslie V. Farland, Melissa M. Herbst-Kralovetz
    iScience.2022; 25(12): 105508.     CrossRef
  • Detection of circulating KRAS mutant DNA in extracellular vesicles using droplet digital PCR in patients with colon cancer
    Jeesoo Choi, Ho Yeon Cho, Jeongseok Jeon, Kyung-A Kim, Yoon Dae Han, Joong Bae Ahn, Inbal Wortzel, David Lyden, Han Sang Kim
    Frontiers in Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Old and New Blood Markers in Human Colorectal Cancer
    Jean-Luc Wautier, Marie-Paule Wautier
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences.2022; 23(21): 12968.     CrossRef
  • Adnexal masses in patients with colorectal cancer
    Utku Akgor, Oguzhan Kuru, Burcu Soyak, Ali Can Gunes, Esra Uyanık, Murat Gultekin, Nejat Ozgul, Coskun Salman
    Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human Reproduction.2021; 50(5): 101898.     CrossRef
  • Identifying Novel Biomarkers Ready for Evaluation in Low-Prevalence Populations for the Early Detection of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review
    Natalia Calanzani, Paige E. Druce, Claudia Snudden, Kristi M. Milley, Rachel Boscott, Dawnya Behiyat, Smiji Saji, Javiera Martinez-Gutierrez, Jasmeen Oberoi, Garth Funston, Mike Messenger, Jon Emery, Fiona M. Walter
    Advances in Therapy.2021; 38(2): 793.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic value of carcinoembryonic antigen levels before and after curative surgery in colon cancer patients
    Hyun Ryung Kim, Jeong Il Joo, Sang Woo Lim, Bo Young Oh
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2021; 100(1): 33.     CrossRef
  • Site-Specific N-Linked Glycosylation Analysis of Human Carcinoembryonic Antigen by Sheathless Capillary Electrophoresis–Tandem Mass Spectrometry
    Laura Pont, Valeriia Kuzyk, Fernando Benavente, Victoria Sanz-Nebot, Oleg A. Mayboroda, Manfred Wuhrer, Guinevere S. M. Lageveen-Kammeijer
    Journal of Proteome Research.2021; 20(3): 1666.     CrossRef
  • A two-tiered targeted proteomics approach to identify pre-diagnostic biomarkers of colorectal cancer risk
    Sophia Harlid, Justin Harbs, Robin Myte, Carl Brunius, Marc J. Gunter, Richard Palmqvist, Xijia Liu, Bethany Van Guelpen
    Scientific Reports.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Roadmap of Colorectal Cancer Screening
    Enea Ferlizza, Rossella Solmi, Michela Sgarzi, Luigi Ricciardiello, Mattia Lauriola
    Cancers.2021; 13(5): 1101.     CrossRef
  • Optimizing the diagnosis and management of ductal prostate cancer
    Weranja Ranasinghe, Daniel D. Shapiro, Miao Zhang, Tharakeswara Bathala, Nora Navone, Timothy C. Thompson, Bradley Broom, Ana Aparicio, Shi-Ming Tu, Chad Tang, John W. Davis, Louis Pisters, Brian F. Chapin
    Nature Reviews Urology.2021; 18(6): 337.     CrossRef
  • Identifying Novel Biomarkers Ready for Evaluation in Low-Prevalence Populations for the Early Detection of Lower Gastrointestinal Cancers: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Paige Druce, Natalia Calanzani, Claudia Snudden, Kristi Milley, Rachel Boscott, Dawnya Behiyat, Javiera Martinez-Gutierrez, Smiji Saji, Jasmeen Oberoi, Garth Funston, Mike Messenger, Fiona M. Walter, Jon Emery
    Advances in Therapy.2021; 38(6): 3032.     CrossRef
  • Metachronous pulmonary and pancreatic metastases arising from sigmoid colon cancer: A case report
    Jian Yang, Yu-Chen Tang, Ni Yin, Wei Liu, Zhi-Fei Cao, Xi Li, Xiao Zou, Zi-Xiang Zhang, Jian Zhou
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2021; 9(15): 3668.     CrossRef
  • Biomarkers in the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: Are we closer to finding the golden ticket?
    Robert S O'Neill, Alina Stoita
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2021; 27(26): 4045.     CrossRef
  • Unique structural features of the adenylate kinase hCINAP/AK6 and its multifaceted functions in carcinogenesis and tumor progression
    Ruidan Xu, Yongfeng Yang, Xiaofeng Zheng
    FEBS Letters.2021; 595(16): 2071.     CrossRef
  • Has the COVID-19 Pandemic Caused Upshifting in Colorectal Cancer Stage?
    Ji Ha Lim, Woo Yong Lee, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Yong Beom Cho, Jung Wook Huh, Yoon Ah Park, Jung Kyong Shin
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(4): 253.     CrossRef
  • SERS liquid biopsy: An emerging tool for medical diagnosis
    Vlad Moisoiu, Stefania D. Iancu, Andrei Stefancu, Tudor Moisoiu, Barbara Pardini, Mihnea P. Dragomir, Nicolae Crisan, Lucretia Avram, Dana Crisan, Iulia Andras, Daniela Fodor, Loredana F. Leopold, Carmen Socaciu, Zoltán Bálint, Ciprian Tomuleasa, Florin E
    Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces.2021; 208: 112064.     CrossRef
  • Risk-Predictive and Diagnostic Biomarkers for Colorectal Cancer; a Systematic Review of Studies Using Pre-Diagnostic Blood Samples Collected in Prospective Cohorts and Screening Settings
    Sophia Harlid, Marc J. Gunter, Bethany Van Guelpen
    Cancers.2021; 13(17): 4406.     CrossRef
  • The Level of Preoperative Plasma KRAS Mutations and CEA Predict Survival of Patients Undergoing Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases
    Jiri Polivka, Jindra Windrichova, Martin Pesta, Katerina Houfkova, Hana Rezackova, Tereza Macanova, Ondrej Vycital, Radek Kucera, David Slouka, Ondrej Topolcan
    Cancers.2020; 12(9): 2434.     CrossRef
  • Thionine-doped nanometer-sized silica conjugated with phenylboronic acid: An innovative recognition/signal element for voltammetric aptasensing of colorectal cancer-related carcinoembryonic antigen
    Liangjie Chi, Chao Xu, Shuyuan Li, Xiangyu Wang, Dianping Tang, Fangqin Xue
    Analytica Chimica Acta.2020; 1136: 91.     CrossRef
  • Molecularly Imprinted Polymers in Biological Applications
    Zahra El-Schich, Yuecheng Zhang, Marek Feith, Sarah Beyer, Louise Sternbæk, Lars Ohlsson, Maria Stollenwerk, Anette Gjörloff Wingren
    BioTechniques.2020; 69(6): 407.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Value of Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Symptomatic Patients without Colorectal Cancer: A Post-Hoc Analysis within the COLONPREDICT Cohort
    Noel Pin-Vieito, María José Iglesias, David Remedios, Victoria Álvarez-Sánchez, Fernando Fernández-Bañares, Jaume Boadas, Eva Martínez-Bauer, Rafael Campo, Luis Bujanda, Ángel Ferrández, Virginia Piñol, Daniel Rodríguez-Alcalde, Martín Menéndez-Rodríguez,
    Diagnostics.2020; 10(12): 1036.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Malignant disease, Prognosis and adjuvant therapy
Long-term Oncologic Outcome of Postoperative Complications After Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Chang Kyu Oh, Jung Wook Huh, You Jin Lee, Moon Suk Choi, Dae Hee Pyo, Sung Chul Lee, Seong Mun Park, Jung Kyong Shin, Yoon Ah Park, Yong Beom Cho, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(4):273-280.   Published online November 13, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2019.10.15
  • 6,789 View
  • 171 Download
  • 23 Web of Science
  • 23 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The impact of postoperative complications on long-term oncologic outcome after radical colorectal cancer surgery is controversial. The aim of this study was to examine the risk factors and oncologic outcomes of surgery-related postoperative complication groups.
Methods
From January 2010 to December 2010, 310 patients experienced surgery-related postoperative complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery. These stage I–III patients were classified into 2 subgroups, minor (grades I, II) and major (grades III, IV) complication groups, according to extended Clavien-Dindo classification system criteria. Clinicopathologic differences between the 2 groups were analyzed to identify risk factors for major complications. The diseasefree survival rates of surgery-related postoperative complication groups were also compared.
Results
Minor and major complication groups were stratified with 194 patients (62.6%) and 116 patients (37.4%), respectively. The risk factors influencing the major complication group were pathologic N category and operative method. The prognostic factors associated with disease-free survival were preoperative perforation, perineural invasion, tumor budding, and receiving neoadjuvant therapy. With a median follow-up period of 72.2 months, the 5-year disease-free survival rates were 84.4% in the minor group and 78.5% in the major group, but there was no statistical significance between the minor and major groups (P = 0.392).
Conclusion
Advanced cancer and open surgery were identified as risk factors for increased surgery-related major complications after radical colorectal cancer surgery. However, severity of postoperative complications did not affect disease-free survival from colorectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Oncologic impact of technical difficulties during the early experience with laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: long-term follow-up results of a prospective cohort study
    Hong-min Ahn, Tae Gyun Lee, Hye-Rim Shin, Jeehye Lee, In Jun Yang, Jung Wook Suh, Heung-Kwon Oh, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang
    Current Problems in Surgery.2025; 63: 101694.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Preoperative and Intraoperative Factors on Postoperative Outcomes in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A 10-Year Retrospective Study
    Lucian Flavius Herlo, Ioana Golu, Alexandra Herlo, Claudia Raluca Balasa Virzob, Ionescu Alin, Stela Iurciuc, Ionut Eduard Iordache, Luana Alexandrescu, Doina Ecaterina Tofolean, Raluca Dumache
    Diseases.2025; 13(1): 16.     CrossRef
  • Surgical management of mucinous adenocarcinoma arising in perianal fistula: A case series
    Saeed Derakhshani, Milad Karimian Ghadim, Abolfazl Salari, Mohammadreza Ghahari
    Surgery Open Science.2025; 26: 1.     CrossRef
  • Organ/space surgical site infection and long-term outcomes of rectal cancer surgery: retrospective population-based cohort study
    Carlota Matallana, Paula Manchon-Walsh, Eloy Espín, Marta Pascual, Sebastiano Biondo, Marta Jiménez-Toscano, Josep Maria Borràs, Josep M Badia, Enric Limón, Luisa Aliste, Rebeca Font, Miguel Pera
    BJS Open.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Accelerated enhanced recovery after colon cancer surgery with discharge within one day after surgery: a systematic review
    Misha A. T. Sier, Anke H. C. Gielen, Thaís T. T. Tweed, Noémi C. van Nie, Tim Lubbers, Jan H. M. B. Stoot
    BMC Cancer.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors of Postoperative Complication and Hospital Mortality after Colorectal Perforation Surgery
    Kensuke Kudou, Shuhei Kajiwara, Takashi Motomura, Takafumi Yukaya, Tomonori Nakanoko, Yosuke Kuroda, Masahiro Okamoto, Tadashi Koga, Yo-Ichi Yamashita
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2024; 8(2): 118.     CrossRef
  • Predictive value of POSSUM scoring system for postoperative complications and mortality in elderly patients with colorectal cancer
    Qiang Li, Yingjun Lu
    Technology and Health Care.2024; 32(6): 4653.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative Complications Result in Poor Oncological Outcomes: What Is the Evidence?
    Anjana Wajekar, Sohan Lal Solanki, Juan Cata, Vijaya Gottumukkala
    Current Oncology.2024; 31(8): 4632.     CrossRef
  • The role of robotic-assisted surgery in the management of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Chenxiong Zhang, Hao Tan, Han Xu, Jiaming Ding
    International Journal of Surgery.2024; 110(10): 6282.     CrossRef
  • Effect of postoperative complications on 5-year survival following laparoscopic surgery for resectable colorectal cancer: a retrospective study
    Jae Eun Lee, Kyeong Eui Kim, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek, Sung Uk Bae
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision Surgery in Rectal Cancer: Analysis of Medium-Term Oncological Outcomes
    Jing-jing Li, Zhi-bo Zhang, Shi-yun Xu, Cheng-ren Zhang, Xiong-fei Yang, Yao-xing Duan
    Surgical Innovation.2023; 30(1): 36.     CrossRef
  • Do postoperative infectious complications really affect long‐term survival in colorectal cancer surgery? A multicenter retrospective cohort study
    Akihisa Matsuda, Hiroshi Maruyama, Shinji Akagi, Toru Inoue, Kenichiro Uemura, Minako Kobayashi, Hisanori Shiomi, Manabu Watanabe, Hiroki Arai, Yutaka Kojima, Yusuke Mizuuchi, Hajime Yokomizo, Yuji Toiyama, Toru Miyake, Yasuyuki Yokoyama, Kei Ishimaru, Sh
    Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2023; 7(1): 110.     CrossRef
  • International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment
    Audrius Dulskas, Philip F. Caushaj, Domas Grigoravicius, Liu Zheng, Richard Fortunato, Joseph W. Nunoo-Mensah, Narimantas E. Samalavicius
    Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(4): 307.     CrossRef
  • Effect of serum lactate dehydrogenase-to-albumin ratio (LAR) on the short-term outcomes and long-term prognosis of colorectal cancer after radical surgery
    Xin-Peng Shu, Ying-Chun Xiang, Fei Liu, Yong Cheng, Wei Zhang, Dong Peng
    BMC Cancer.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Modified Clavien–Dindo–sink classification system for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
    Ndéye F. Guissé, Joseph D. Stone, Lukas G. Keil, Tracey P. Bastrom, Mark A. Erickson, Burt Yaszay, Patrick J. Cahill, Stefan Parent, Peter G. Gabos, Peter O. Newton, Michael P. Glotzbecker, Michael P. Kelly, Joshua M. Pahys, Nicholas D. Fletcher
    Spine Deformity.2022; 10(1): 87.     CrossRef
  • Surgical site infection after laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer is associated with compromised long-term oncological outcome
    Nana Sugamata, Takashi Okuyama, Emiko Takeshita, Haruka Oi, Yuhei Hakozaki, Shunya Miyazaki, Musashi Takada, Takashi Mitsui, Takuji Noro, Hideyuki Yoshitomi, Masatoshi Oya
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Does Preoperative Waiting Time Affect the Short-Term Outcomes and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer Patients? A Retrospective Study from the West of China
    Xiao-Yu Liu, Zi-Wei Li, Bing Kang, Yu-Xi Cheng, Wei Tao, Bin Zhang, Hua Zhang, Zheng-Qiang Wei, Dong Peng, Antonio Giovanni Solimando
    Canadian Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2022; 2022: 1.     CrossRef
  • Surgical safety in the COVID-19 era: present and future considerations
    Young Il Kim, In Ja Park
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 102(6): 295.     CrossRef
  • Current status and role of robotic approach in patients with low-lying rectal cancer
    Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer
    Sung Uk Bae
    Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 577.     CrossRef
  • Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, and Current Management
    Seung Mi Yeo, Gyung Mo Son
    The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Current Status and Future of Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
    Sung Uk Bae
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 221.     CrossRef
  • A propensity score-matched analysis of advanced energy devices and conventional monopolar device for colorectal cancer surgery: comparison of clinical and oncologic outcomes
    Woo Jin Song, Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(5): 290.     CrossRef
Oncologic Outcomes of Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in Stage II and III Upper Rectal Cancer
Ji Eun Yoon, Soo Young Lee, Han Duk Kwak, Seung Seop Yeom, Chang Hyun Kim, Jae Kyun Joo, Hyeong Rok Kim, Young Jin Kim
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(3):137-143.   Published online June 30, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.09.28
  • 6,008 View
  • 109 Download
  • 6 Web of Science
  • 6 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The aim of this study was to assess oncological outcomes of postoperative radiotherapy plus chemotherapy (CRT) versus chemotherapy alone (CTx) in stage II or III upper rectal cancer patients who underwent curative surgery.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 263 consecutive patients with pathologic stage II or III upper rectal cancer who underwent primary curative resection with postoperative CRT or CTx from January 2008 to December 2014 at Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital. Multivariate and propensity score matching analyses were used to reduce selection bias.
Results
Median follow-up was 48.1 months for the entire cohort and 53.5 months for the matched cohort. In subgroup analysis of the propensity score matched cohort, the 3-year local recurrence-free survival was 94.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.8%–100%) in the CRT group and 90.1% (95% CI, 82.8%–97.9%) in the CTx group (P = 0.370). No significant difference in disease-free survival was observed according to treatment type. On multivariate analysis, circumferential resection margin involvement (hazard ratio [HR], 2.386; 95% CI, 1.190–7.599; P = 0.032), N stage (HR, 6.262; 95% CI, 1.843–21.278, P = 0.003), and T stage (HR, 5.896, 95% CI, 1.298–6.780, P = 0.021) were identified as independent risk factors for local recurrence of tumors of the upper rectum.
Conclusion
Omission of radiotherapy in an adjuvant treatment setting may not jeopardize oncologic outcomes in stages II and III upper rectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Efficacies of radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision or other types of surgery: an updated meta-analysis
    Wenshu Wang, Runyuan Zhao, Xi Liang, Manjun Liu, Haiyan Bai, Jianli Ge, Binxi Yao, Zheng Zhi, Jianming He
    Oncology Reviews.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy necessary for locally advanced rectal cancer above the anterior peritoneal reflection?
    Minyi He, Wuteng Cao, Qiulan He, Fujin Ye, Pinzhu Huang, Taixuan Wan, Huashan Liu, Xiaobin Zheng, Shuangling Luo, Liang Kang, Mian Chen, Liang Huang
    Future Oncology.2025; 21(28): 3667.     CrossRef
  • The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Rectal Cancer 2023 Supplement
    Sean J. Langenfeld, Bradley R. Davis, Jon D. Vogel, Jennifer S. Davids, Larissa K.F. Temple, Kyle G. Cologne, Samantha Hendren, Steven Hunt, Julio Garcia Aguilar, Daniel L. Feingold, Amy L. Lightner, Ian M. Paquette
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2024; 67(1): 18.     CrossRef
  • Is radiotherapy necessary for upper rectal cancer underwent curative resection? A retrospective study of 363 patients
    Zhiwei Ma, Jumei Zhou, Ke Liu, Sisi Chen, Qinghui Wu, Lin Peng, Wei Zhao, Suyu Zhu
    Radiation Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Which Definition of Upper Rectal Cancer Is Optimal in Selecting Stage II or III Rectal Cancer Patients to Avoid Postoperative Adjuvant Radiation?
    Xian Hua Gao, Bai Zhi Zhai, Juan Li, Jean Luc Tshibangu Kabemba, Hai Feng Gong, Chen Guang Bai, Ming Lu Liu, Shao Ting Zhang, Fu Shen, Lian Jie Liu, Wei Zhang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Role of adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy for resected extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: a meta-analysis
    Xin-qi Shi, Jing-yu Zhang, Hua Tian, Ling-na Tang, Ai-lin Li
    Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE B.2020; 21(7): 549.     CrossRef
Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization With Doppler Arterial Identification Versus Classic Hemorrhoidectomy: A Retrospective Analysis of 270 Patients
Vincenzo Consalvo, Francesca D’Auria, Vincenzo Salsano
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(3):118-122.   Published online May 31, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.09.04
  • 7,257 View
  • 176 Download
  • 5 Web of Science
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Despite the minimally invasive nature of transanal hemorrhoidal dearterialization (THD) with Doppler arterial identification procedures, hemorrhoidectomy is still considered the gold standard procedure for hemorrhoidal disease. However, the classical techniques of hemorrhoidectomy have a high rate of postoperative complications. The main purpose of this study is to demonstrate the efficacy and complications of these techniques used for grades II and III hemorrhoids.
Methods
A retrospective (case-control) study was carried out from January 2009 to May 2014, and all patients undergoing surgical procedures for hemorrhoidal disease in two French clinics were considered. Application of inclusion and exclusion criteria identified 270 eligible patients (163 undergoing Doppler THD and 107 treated with Milligan Morgan hemorrhoidectomy). Statistical analysis was calculated considering immediate postoperative complications, functional results, chronic complications, and recurrences.
Results
Analysis of primary outcomes showed a significant difference between the 2 groups concerning postoperative pain, which had a lower rate in THD (P = 0.0001) and in postoperative bleeding (P = 0.02) than hemorrhoidectomy. However, long-term follow-up at three years showed a superior rate of recurrence in the THD group (P = 0.009).
Conclusion
The THD technique is a safe and effective procedure for grades II and III hemorrhoids, has lower rates of post-operative pain and bleeding, and allows faster hospital discharge; however, it also shows a higher rate of recurrence at three years of follow-up.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Milligan–Morgan hemorrhoidectomy combined with rubber band ligation and polidocanol foam sclerotherapy for the management of grade III/IV hemorrhoids: a retrospective study
    Qing Long, Yong Wen, Jun Li
    BMC Gastroenterology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transanal Hemorrhoidal Dearterialization With Mucopexy Versus Vessel-Sealing Device Hemorrhoidectomy for Grade III to IV Hemorrhoids: Long-term Outcomes From the THDLIGA Randomized Controlled Trial
    Loris Trenti, Sebastiano Biondo, Eloy Espin-Basany, Oriana Barrios, Jose L. Sanchez-Garcia, • Aitor Landaluce-Olavarria, Elena Bermejo-Marcos, • Maria T. Garcia-Martinez, David Alias Jimenez, Fernando Jimenez, Adolfo Alonso, Maria B. Manso, Esther Kreisle
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2023; 66(8): e818.     CrossRef
  • Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy Versus Dearterialization With Mucopexy for the Treatment of Grade III Hemorrhoidal Disease: The EMODART3 Multicenter Study
    Antonio Giuliani, Lucia Romano, Stefano Necozione, Vincenza Cofini, Giada Di Donato, Mario Schietroma, Francesco Carlei
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2023; 66(12): e1254.     CrossRef
  • CLINICAL AND MORPHOLOGICAL EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING RADIO WAVE AND HIGH-FREQUENCY ELECTROSURGERY TECHNOLOGIES FOR THE TREATMENT OF COMBINED ANORECTAL DISEASES
    V. V. Balytskyy, M. P. Zakharash, O. G. Kuryk
    World of Medicine and Biology.2022; 18(80): 19.     CrossRef
  • Linear Pinched Hemorrhoidectomy: A Retrospective Observational Study (An Innovative, Simplified Hemorrhoidectomy)
    Akiharu Kurihara, Yu Yoshino, Yu Sakai, Yasuyuki Miura, Satoru Kagami, Tomoaki Kaneko, Mitsunori Ushigome, Hiroyuki Shiokawa, Hironori Kaneko, Kimihiko Funahashi
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2021; 5(3): 261.     CrossRef
  • Haemorrhoidal artery ligation with and without Doppler guidance in the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease: a single-centre randomized study
    P. V. Tsarkov, M. A. Popovtsev, Yu. S. Medkova, A. V. Alekberzade, N. N. Krylov
    Sechenov Medical Journal.2021; 12(3): 47.     CrossRef
  • Hemorrhoidal artery ligation without Doppler navigation in surgical treatment of hemorrhoidal disease
    M.A. Popovtsev, A.V. Alekberzade, N.N. Krylov
    Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2021; (12): 49.     CrossRef
Comparison of Limberg Flap and Karydakis Flap Surgery for the Treatment of Patients With Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Single-Blinded Parallel Randomized Study
Mina Alvandipour, Mohammad Sadegh Zamani, Mojtaba Ghorbani, Jamshid Yazdani Charati, Mohammad Yasin Karami
Ann Coloproctol. 2019;35(6):313-318.   Published online May 22, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.09.27
  • 18,517 View
  • 267 Download
  • 15 Web of Science
  • 24 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Pilonidal sinus disease is a common condition, which mostly affects young men. While various surgical techniques have been introduced for treating intergluteal pilonidal disease (IPD), controversies still exist regarding the best surgical approach. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficiency and the short-term outcomes of Limberg flap and Karydakis flap surgeries for the treatments of patients with IPD.
Methods
A total of 80 patients with IPD who had underwent either Karydakis flap (KF group: n = 37) or Limberg flap (LF group: n = 27) surgery between January 2015 and January 2016 at Imam Khomeini Hospital of Sari in the North of Iran were recruited for inclusion in this randomized, single-blind study.
Results
Compared to the KF group, the LF group showed faster complete wound healing, longer duration of surgery and hospital stay, larger wound size, and shorter period of incapacity for work. The overall patient satisfaction in the LF group was significantly higher than that in the KF group. The visual analogue scale score of pain was lower in the LF group than in the KF group. Also, the overall frequency of postoperative complications was higher in the KF group than in the LF group. Recurrence was reported in one patient from the KF group.
Conclusion
Given the lower rate of postoperative complications and greater cosmetic satisfaction of patients, the Limberg flap procedure should be selected, instead of the Karydakis flap procedure, as the standard technique for treating patients with IPD.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Short-term results of unroofing and marsupialization compared to the Karydakis technique in the treatment of pilonidal sinus. A randomized prospective study
    Pedro Antonio Parra Baños, Nuria Martínez Sanz, Francisco Miguel González Valverde, Jorge Alejandro Benavides Buleje, Miguel Ruiz Marín, Emilio Peña Ros, Carmen Martínez Sanz, Mari Fe Candel Arenas
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2025; 103(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Resultados a corto plazo de la puesta a plano, curetaje y marsupialización frente a la técnica de Karydakis en el tratamiento del seno pilonidal. Estudio prospectivo aleatorizado
    Pedro Antonio Parra Baños, Nuria Martínez Sanz, Francisco Miguel González Valverde, Jorge Alejandro Benavides Buleje, Miguel Ruiz Marín, Emilio Peña Ros, Carmen Martínez Sanz, Mari Fe Candel Arenas
    Cirugía Española.2025; 103(1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Langzeitergebnisse einer Pilotstudie über das zweizeitige Verfahren mit primärer Exzision und Limberg-Plastik im Intervall zur Therapie einer sakrokokzygealen Pilonidalsinuserkrankung
    Michael Ardelt, Falk Rauchfuss, Felix Dondorf, Aladdin Ali Deeb, Astrid Bauschke, Oliver Rohland, Laura Schwenk, Utz Settmacher
    Die Chirurgie.2025; 96(8): 667.     CrossRef
  • Outcome After Surgical Treatment for Chronic Pilonidal Sinus Disease: A Systematic Review of Common Surgical Techniques
    Ida-Marie Myron Wiinblad, Johan Ulrichsen, Birgitte Brandstrup
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2025; 68(5): 515.     CrossRef
  • Midline and off-midline wound closure methods after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus
    Zhaolun Cai, Zhou Zhao, Qin Ma, Chaoyong Shen, Zhiyuan Jiang, Chunyu Liu, Chunjuan Liu, Bo Zhang
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A new method for wound defect closure after pilonidal sinus excision
    E. N. Shubrov, A G. Baryshev, K. V. Triandafilov
    Koloproktologia.2024; 23(1): 129.     CrossRef
  • The application of ERAS in pilonidal sinus: comparison of postoperative recovery between primary suture and Limberg flap procedure in a multicenter prospective randomized trial
    Wei Lu, Shujuan Huang, Hui Ye, Shang Xiang, Xiangsheng Zeng
    Frontiers in Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Management and outcomes of pilonidal patients with secondary sinuses—a cohort study
    Norah E. Liang, Claire Abrajano, Kyla Santos Dalusag, Bill Chiu
    Pediatric Surgery International.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dutch national guideline on the management of intergluteal pilonidal sinus disease
    Eleonora A Huurman, Christel A L de Raaff, Pim C E J Sloots, Oren Lapid, Hessel H van der Zee, Wilfred Bötger, Sandra Janssen, Francine Das, Andrea L J Kortlever-van der Spek, Anja van der Hout, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Boudewijn R Toorenvliet, Robert M Smeenk
    British Journal of Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Outcome between Limberg Flap and Karydakis Flap in Pilonidal Sinus Disease
    Madeeha Shahid, Muhammad Khalid, Nazia Qamar, Salman Zafar, Sadia Sundus, Abdul Rehman
    Pakistan Journal of Health Sciences.2024; : 174.     CrossRef
  • The application of the Limberg flap repair technique in the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease
    Yaoyao Song, Yu Zang, Zequn Chen, Jianjun Li, Minhui Zhu, Hongjuan Zhu, Wanli Chu, Gang Liu, Chuan'an Shen
    International Wound Journal.2023; 20(6): 2241.     CrossRef
  • Management of Pilonidal Disease
    Lindsay A. Gil, Katherine J. Deans, Peter C. Minneci
    JAMA Surgery.2023; 158(8): 875.     CrossRef
  • Bilaterally parallel elliptic flap versus Karydakis flap in primary pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled trial
    Umut Fırat Turan, Serdar Coban, Tezcan Akin, Huseyin Berkem, Bulent Cavit Yuksel, Sadettin Er
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of single center clinical experience in patients undergoing modified Limberg flap technique in pilonidal sinus disease
    Burak UÇANER, Şebnem ÇİMEN, Mehmet Zeki BULDANLI
    Journal of Medicine and Palliative Care.2023; 4(6): 694.     CrossRef
  • Comparative Study on Short-Term Outcome in Patients Undergoing Pilonidal Sinus Surgery in Tertiary Care
    Dakshay A. Chordia, A. P. Prem, Jameel Akhter, M. Muralidharan, A. Sathishkumar
    Indian Journal of Colo-Rectal Surgery.2023; 6(1): 4.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of the Outcomes of a New Method for Plastic Surgery for Postoperative Wound Of Sacrococcygeal Region after Excision of the Pilonidal Cyst: Randomized Trial.
    E. N. Shubrov, A. G. Baryshev, K. V. Triandafilov, V. A. Aladina, V. V. Fedyushkin, R. K. Amirova
    Kuban Scientific Medical Bulletin.2022; 29(5): 80.     CrossRef
  • Effectiveness and Feasibility of Limberg and Karydakis Flap in Recurrent and Complicated Pilonidal Sinus Disease
    Amr Abdel Hameed Elhiny, Doaa Ali Saad, Mohamed Sadek Farahat
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2021; 83(1): 55.     CrossRef
  • S3-Leitlinie: Sinus pilonidalis. 2. revidierte Fassung 2020
    A. Ommer, I. Iesalnieks, D. Doll
    coloproctology.2021; 43(S1): 25.     CrossRef
  • Pilonoidal Sinüs Tedavisinde Modifiye Limberg Flep Uygulaması Sonuçları
    Nizamettin KUTLUER, Nurullah AKSOY
    Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi.2021; 16(1): 68.     CrossRef
  • Pilonidal Sinus Disease: An Analysis of the Factors Affecting Recurrence
    Murat Kanlioz, Uğur Ekici, Faik Tatli, Turgay Karatas
    Advances in Skin & Wound Care.2021; 34(2): 81.     CrossRef
  • Karydakis procedure versus Limberg flap for treatment of pilonidal sinus: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Sameh Hany Emile, Sualeh Muslim Khan, Samer Hani Barsom, Steven D Wexner
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2021; 36(7): 1421.     CrossRef
  • Evaluation of comma-shaped incision with a sacral flap in surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus
    MinaR.A.R. El Nahal, MohammedY.F. Aly, RagaiS Hanna, GamalA Makhlouf, GamalA Hameed Ahmed
    Journal of Current Medical Research and Practice.2020; 5(1): 46.     CrossRef
  • Surgical procedures in the pilonidal sinus disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis
    Siwei Bi, Kaibo Sun, Shanshan Chen, Jun Gu
    Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • An effective minimal invasive method in pilonidal sinus surgery: Sinusotomy
    Önder KARABAY
    Archives of Clinical and Experimental Medicine.2019; 4(3): 138.     CrossRef
Female Sex and Right-Sided Tumor Location Are Poor Prognostic Factors for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer After a Curative Resection
Jung Ho Park, Hyoung-Chul Park, Sung Chan Park, Jae Hwan Oh, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang, Seung Chul Heo, Min Jung Kim, Ji Won Park, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park, for the Seoul Colorectal Group (SECOG)
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(6):286-291.   Published online December 31, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2018.10.29
  • 5,958 View
  • 120 Download
  • 1 Web of Science
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
Stage-IIIC colon cancer is an advanced disease; however, its oncologic outcomes and prognostic factors remain unclear. In this study, we aimed to determine the predictors of disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage-IIIC colon cancer.
Methods
From a multicenter database, we retrospectively enrolled 611 patients (355 men and 256 women) who had undergone a potentially curative resection for a stage-IIIC colon adenocarcinoma between 2003 and 2011. The primary end-point was the 5-year DFS.
Results
The median age was 62 years; 213 and 398 patients had right-sided colon cancer (RCC) and left-sided colon cancer (LCC), respectively. The 5-year DFS in all patients was 52.0%; median follow-up time was 35 months (range, 1–134 months). A multivariate Cox regression revealed that female sex (hazard ratio [HR], 1.50; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.19–1.90; P < 0.01), right-sided tumor location (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.29–2.11; P < 0.01), lymphatic invasion (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.08–2.15; P < 0.01) and a high (≥0.4) metastatic lymph node ratio (HR, 3.72; 95% CI, 2.63–5.24; P < 0.01) were independent predictors of worse 5-year DFS. Female patients with RCC were 1.79 fold more likely to experience recurrence than male patients with LCC.
Conclusion
Female sex and right-sided tumor location are associated with higher tumor recurrence rates in patients with stage-IIIC colon cancers. Aggressive treatment and close surveillance should be planned for patients in these groups.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Development and external validation of a nomogram predicting overall survival after curative resection of colon cancer
    Shuanhu Wang, Yakui Liu, Yi Shi, Jiajia Guan, Mulin Liu, Wenbin Wang
    Journal of International Medical Research.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
Clinical Etiology of Hypermetabolic Pelvic Lesions in Postoperative Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Patients With Rectal and Sigmoid Cancer
Yun Hee Kang, Eunji Han, Geon Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2018;34(2):78-82.   Published online April 30, 2018
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.09.21
  • 6,525 View
  • 77 Download
  • 3 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to present various clinical etiologies of hypermetabolic pelvic lesions on postoperative positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images for patients with rectal and sigmoid cancer.
Methods
Postoperative PET/CT images for patients with rectal and sigmoid cancer were retrospectively reviewed to identify hypermetabolic pelvic lesions. Positive findings were detected in 70 PET/CT images from 45 patients; 2 patients who were lost to follow-up were excluded. All PET findings were analyzed in comparison with contrast-enhanced CT.
Results
A total of 43 patients were classified into 2 groups: patients with a malignancy including local recurrence (n = 30) and patients with other benign lesions (n = 13). Malignant lesions such as a local recurrent tumor, peritoneal carcinomatosis, and incidental uterine malignancy, as well as various benign lesions such as an anastomotic sinus, fistula, abscess, reactive lymph node, and normal ovary, were observed.
Conclusion
PET/CT performed during postoperative surveillance of rectal and sigmoid colon cancer showed increased fluorodeoxyglucose uptake not only in local recurrence, but also in benign pelvic etiologies. Therefore, physicians need to be cautious about the broad clinical spectrum of hypermetabolic pelvic lesions when interpreting images.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Diagnostic and prognostic value of quantitative 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameters combined with clinical indicators in patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer
    Junjie Li, Yin Zhou, Liu Liu, Hua Pang
    Abdominal Radiology.2025; 50(11): 5135.     CrossRef
  • Variants and Pitfalls in PET/CT Imaging of Gastrointestinal Cancers
    Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam, Viktoriya Paroder, Heiko Schöder
    Seminars in Nuclear Medicine.2021; 51(5): 485.     CrossRef
Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Patients With Rectal Tumors: A Single Institution's Experience
Audrius Dulskas, Alfredas Kilius, Kestutis Petrulis, Narimantas E. Samalavicius
Ann Coloproctol. 2017;33(1):23-27.   Published online February 28, 2017
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2017.33.1.23
  • 6,295 View
  • 54 Download
  • 12 Web of Science
  • 15 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The purpose of this study was to look at our complication rates and recurrence rates, as well as the need for further radical surgery, in treating patients with benign and early malignant rectal tumors by using transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM).

Methods

Our study included 130 patients who had undergone TEM for rectal adenomas and early rectal cancer from December 2009 to December 2015 at the Department of Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Lithuania. Patients underwent digital and endoscopic evaluation with multiple biopsies. For preoperative staging, pelvic magnetic resonance imaging or endorectal ultrasound was performed. We recorded the demographics, operative details, final pathologies, postoperative lengths of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and recurrences.

Results

The average tumor size was 2.8 ± 1.5 cm (range, 0.5–8.3 cm). 102 benign (78.5%) and 28 malignant tumors (21.5%) were removed. Of the latter, 23 (82.1%) were pT1 cancers and 5 (17.9%) pT2 cancers. Of the 5 patients with pT2 cancer, 2 underwent adjuvant chemoradiotherapy, 1 underwent an abdominoperineal resection, 1 refused further treatment and 1 was lost to follow up. No intraoperative complications occurred. In 7 patients (5.4%), postoperative complications were observed: urinary retention (4 patients, 3.1%), postoperative hemorrhage (2 patients, 1.5%), and wound dehiscence (1 patient, 0.8%). All complications were treated conservatively. The mean postoperative hospital stay was 2.3 days.

Conclusion

TEM in our experience demonstrated low complication and recurrence rates. This technique is recommended for treating patients with a rectal adenoma and early rectal cancer and has good prognosis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • TEMPOUR: A Randomized Controlled Trial Assessing Perioperative Use of an Alpha-1 Blocker to Reduce Postoperative Urinary Retention After Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery Procedures
    Thomas Couture, Claudya Morin, Janyssa Charbonneau, Émilie Papillon-Dion, Alexandre Bouchard, François Rouleau-Fournier, Philippe Bouchard, François Letarte, Alexis F. Turgeon, Sebastien Drolet
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2025; 68(4): 475.     CrossRef
  • The Outcome of Local Excision of Rectal Adenomas with High-Grade Dysplasia by Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery: A Single-Center Experience
    Muhammad Khalifa, Rachel Gingold-Belfer, Nidal Issa
    Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(5): 1419.     CrossRef
  • Transanal endoscopic rectal resection: immediate and long-term results
    A.A. Maslov, Yu.A. Gevorkyan, N.V. Soldatkina, A.V. Dashkov, S.I. Poluektov, V.E. Kolesnikov, D.O. Kaymakchi, A.V. Snezhko
    Khirurgiya. Zhurnal im. N.I. Pirogova.2022; (1): 30.     CrossRef
  • Complex Procedures in Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery: Intraperitoneal Entry, Ultra Large Rectal Tumors, High Lesions, and Resection in the Anal Canal
    Xavier Serra-Aracil, Victoria Lucas-Guerrero, Laura Mora-López
    Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2022; 35(02): 129.     CrossRef
  • Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early rectal cancer
    Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Sung Hwan Cho, Byung-Soo Park, Hyun Sung Kim, Su Bum Park, Hyung Wook Kim, Sang Bo Oh, Tae Un Kim, Dong Hoon Shin
    Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(1): 32.     CrossRef
  • Is Local Resection of Anal Canal Tumors Feasible with Transanal Endoscopic Surgery?
    Xavier Serra‐Aracil, Andrea Campos‐Serra, Laura Mora‐López, Sheila Serra‐Pla, Anna Pallisera‐Lloveras, Roser Flores‐Clotet, Alba Zárate‐Pinedo, Salvador Navarro‐Soto
    World Journal of Surgery.2020; 44(3): 939.     CrossRef
  • Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for a rectal polyp – a video vignette
    N. E. Samalavicius, P. Kavaliauskas, A. Dulskas
    Colorectal Disease.2020; 22(9): 1203.     CrossRef
  • Endoscopic diagnosis of gastrointestinal melanoma
    Sheng Wang, Siyu Sun, Xiang Liu, Nan Ge, Guoxin Wang, Jintao Guo, Wen Liu, Jinlong Hu
    Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 55(3): 330.     CrossRef
  • Is Previous Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Early Rectal Cancer a Risk Factor of Worse Outcome following Salvage Surgery A Case-Matched Analysis
    Audrius Dulskas, Aivaras Atkociunas, Alfredas Kilius, Kestutis Petrulis, Narimantas E. Samalavicius
    Visceral Medicine.2019; 35(3): 151.     CrossRef
  • Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for rectal lesions in a specialist regional early rectal cancer centre: the Mersey experience
    M. Ondhia, P. Tamvakeras, P. O'Toole, A. Montazerri, T. Andrews, C. Farrell, S. Ahmed, S. Slawik, S. Ahmed
    Colorectal Disease.2019; 21(10): 1164.     CrossRef
  • Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery for Patients with Rare Rectal Tumors
    Xin Wu, Guole Lin, Huizhong Qiu, Jiaolin Zhou
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2018; 28(5): 546.     CrossRef
  • Modern management of T1 rectal cancer by transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a 10‐year single‐centre experience
    H. J. S. Jones, R. Hompes, N. Mortensen, C. Cunningham
    Colorectal Disease.2018; 20(7): 586.     CrossRef
  • Transanal endoscopic microsurgery as day surgery – a single‐centre experience with 500 patients
    C. J. Brown, J. Q. Gentles, T. P. Phang, A. A. Karimuddin, M. J. Raval
    Colorectal Disease.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery
    Byung Chun Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2017; 33(1): 5.     CrossRef
  • Transanal endoscopic microsurgery for giant benign rectal tumours: is large size a contraindication?
    Audrius Dulskas, Alfredas Kilius, Kestutis Petrulis, Narimantas E. Samalavicius
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2017; 32(12): 1759.     CrossRef
Efficacy of Dose-Escalated Radiotherapy for Recurrent Colorectal Cancer
Sunmi Jo, Yunseon Choi, Sung-Kwang Park, Jin-Young Kim, Hyun Jung Kim, Yun-Han Lee, Won Yong Oh, Heunglae Cho, Ki Jung Ahn
Ann Coloproctol. 2016;32(2):66-72.   Published online April 30, 2016
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2016.32.2.66
  • 5,309 View
  • 36 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of radiotherapy (RT) on progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with recurrent colorectal cancer.

Methods

We reviewed the records of 22 patients with recurrent colorectal cancer treated with RT between 2008 and 2014. The median radiation dose for recurrent disease was 57.6 Gy (range, 45–75.6 Gy). Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the type of RT: patients underwent RT without previous history of irradiation (n = 14) and those treated with secondary RT (reirradiation: n = 8) at the time of recurrence.

Results

The median follow-up period was 24.9 months (range, 4.5–66.6 months). Progression was observed in 14 patients (including 8 with loco-regional failure and 9 with distant metastases). Distant metastases were related to the RT dose (<70 Gy, P = 0.031). The 2-year loco-regional control (LRC), PFS, and overall survival (OS) rates were 74.6%, 45.1%, and 82.0%, respectively. The LRC rate was not different between the patients treated with RT for the first time and those treated with reirradiation (P = 0.101, 2-year LRC 79.5% vs. 41.7%). However, reirradiation was related to poor PFS (P = 0.022) and OS (P = 0.002). An escalated RT dose (≥70 Gy) was associated with a higher PFS (P = 0.014, 2-year PFS 63.5% vs. 20.8%).

Conclusion

Salvage RT for locally recurrent colorectal cancer can be offered when surgery is impossible. Dose-escalated RT shows a possible benefit in reducing the risk of progression.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Carbon-ion Radiotherapy for Colorectal Cancer
    Shigeru Yamada, Hirotoshi Takiyama, Yuka Isozaki, Makoto Shinoto, Hirokazu Makishima, Naoyoshi Yamamoto, Hiroshi Tsuji
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2021; 5(2): 113.     CrossRef
  • LncRNA TTN‐AS1/miR‐134‐5p/PAK3 axis regulates the radiosensitivity of human large intestine cancer cells through the P21 pathway and AKT/GSK‐3β/β‐catenin pathway
    Zhenkui Zuo, Shuling Ji, Lulu He, Yage Zhang, Zining Peng, Jiarui Han
    Cell Biology International.2020; 44(11): 2284.     CrossRef
  • A Review on the Special Radiotherapy Techniques of Colorectal Cancer
    Shing Yau Tam, Vincent W. C. Wu
    Frontiers in Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of overall survival and quality of life between patients undergoing anal reconstruction and patients undergoing traditional lower abdominal stoma after radical resection
    P. Du, S.-Y. Wang, P.-F. Zheng, J. Mao, H. Hu, Z.-B. Cheng
    Clinical and Translational Oncology.2019; 21(10): 1390.     CrossRef
  • Prospective Observational Study of High-Dose Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Pelvic Recurrence of Rectal Cancer (GUNMA 0801)
    Shintaro Shiba, Masahiko Okamoto, Hiroki Kiyohara, Tatsuya Ohno, Takuya Kaminuma, Takayuki Asao, Hitoshi Ojima, Ken Shirabe, Hiroyuki Kuwano, Takashi Nakano
    Frontiers in Oncology.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of varying radiation dosages on MMP1 expression, and MMP1 knockdown on the viability and migration of SW620 cells
    Fang Ju, Na Li, Wenming Wang, Haicheng Yuan
    Molecular Medicine Reports.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Dose-Escalated Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Patients With Recurrent Colorectal Cancer
    Hyung Jin Kim, Seong Taek Oh
    Annals of Coloproctology.2016; 32(2): 47.     CrossRef
The Clinical Features and Predictive Risk Factors for Reoperation in Patients With Perianal Crohn Diseases; A Multi-Center Study of a Korean Inflammatory Bowel Disease Study Group
Jae Bum Lee, Seo-Gue Yoon, Kyu Joo Park, Kang Young Lee, Dae Dong Kim, Sang Nam Yoon, Chang Sik Yu
Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(5):176-181.   Published online October 31, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.5.176
  • 4,556 View
  • 63 Download
  • 8 Web of Science
  • 8 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Perianal lesions are common in Crohn disease, but their clinical course is unpredictable. Nevertheless, predicting the clinical course after surgery for perianal Crohn disease (PCD) is important because repeated operations may decrease patient's quality of life. The aim of this study was to predict the risk of reoperation in patients with PCD.

Methods

From September 1994 to February 2010, 377 patients with PCD were recruited in twelve major tertiary university-affiliated hospitals and two specialized colorectal hospitals in Korea. Data on the patient's demographics, clinical features, and surgical outcomes were analyzed.

Results

Among 377 patients, 227 patients were ultimately included in the study. Among the 227 patients, 64 patients underwent at least one reoperation. The median period of reoperation following the first perianal surgery was 94 months. Overall 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year cumulative rates of reoperation-free individuals were 68.8%, 61.2%, and 50.5%, respectively. In multivariate analysis (Cox-regression hazard model), reoperation was significantly correlated with an age of onset less than 20 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-3.48; P = 0.03), history of abdominal surgery (HR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.08-3.64; P = 0.03), and the type of surgery. Among types of surgery, fistulotomy or fistulectomy was associated with a decreased incidence of reoperation in comparison with incision and drainage (HR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.09-0.42; P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Young age of onset and a history of abdominal surgery were associated with a high risk of reoperation for PCD, and the risk of reoperation were relatively low in fistulotomy or fistulectomy procedures.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A nanofiber-hydrogel composite improves tissue repair in a rat model of Crohn’s disease perianal fistulas
    Ling Li, Zhi-Cheng Yao, Alyssa Parian, Yueh-Hsun Yang, Jeffrey Chao, Jason Yin, Kevan J. Salimian, Sashank K. Reddy, Atif Zaheer, Susan L. Gearhart, Hai-Quan Mao, Florin M. Selaru
    Science Advances.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Predictors of reoperation for perianal fistula in Crohn's disease
    Kwangwoo Nam, Won Beom Jung, Seung Bum Lee, Jae Seung Soh, Song Soo Yang, Seok Won Jung
    Journal of Digestive Diseases.2021; 22(6): 334.     CrossRef
  • Perianal and Luminal Relapse Following Perianal Surgical Intervention in Crohn’s Disease
    Feihong Deng, Pianpian Xia, Zengrong Wu, Hejun Zhou, Xuehong Wang
    International Journal of General Medicine.2021; Volume 14: 3387.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of Perianal Fistula Relapse in Crohn’s Disease
    Audrey Malian, Pauline Rivière, Dominique Bouchard, François Pigot, Marianne Eléouet-Kaplan, Charlotte Favreau-Weltzer, Florian Poullenot, David Laharie
    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2020; 26(6): 926.     CrossRef
  • Predictors of Perianal Fistula Relapse in Crohn’s Disease
    Dana J Lukin
    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Management of Perianal Fistulas in Crohn’s Disease
    Steffen Seyfried, Alexander Herold
    Visceral Medicine.2019; 35(6): 338.     CrossRef
  • Surgical management of fistulating perianal Crohn's disease: a UK survey
    M. J. Lee, N. Heywood, P. M. Sagar, S. R. Brown, N. S. Fearnhead
    Colorectal Disease.2017; 19(3): 266.     CrossRef
  • Risk of Repeat Surgery for Perianal Crohn Disease
    Doo Han Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(5): 169.     CrossRef
Short-term Intravenous Antibiotic Treatment in Uncomplicated Diverticulitis Does Not Increase the Risk of Recurrence Compared to Long-term Treatment
Cosimo Riccardo Scarpa, Nicolas Christian Buchs, Antoine Poncet, Béatrice Konrad-Mugnier, Pascal Gervaz, Philippe Morel, Frédéric Ris
Ann Coloproctol. 2015;31(2):52-56.   Published online April 30, 2015
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2015.31.2.52
  • 8,735 View
  • 55 Download
  • 14 Web of Science
  • 12 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

This study included all patients treated at the University Hospital of Geneva for a first episode of uncomplicated diverticulitis. Risks of recurrence and treatment failure were evaluated by comparing the results between short-course and long-course intravenous (IV) antibiotic therapy groups.

Methods

The records of all patients hospitalized at our facility from January 2007 to February 2012 for a first episode of uncomplicated diverticulitis (Hinchey Ia), as confirmed by computed tomography, were prospectively collected. We published an auxiliary analysis from this registered study at Clinicaltrials.gov (identifier number: NCT01015378). Two groups of patients were considered: one received a short-course IV antibiotic arm (ceftriaxone and metronidazole) for up to 5 days (followed by 5 days of oral antibiotics); the other received a long-course IV arm between days 5 and 10. The primary outcome was the recurrence-free survival time.

Results

Follow-up was completed for 256 patients-50% men and 50% women, with a median age of 56 years (range, 24-85 years). The average follow-up was 50 months (range, 19-89 months). Of the 256 patients included in the study, 46 patients received a short-course IV antibiotic treatment and 210 received a long-course treatment. The recurrence-free survivals were very similar between the two groups, which was supported by a log rank test (P = 0.772). Four treatment failures, all in the long-course IV antibiotic treatment group, occurred.

Conclusion

Treatment of diverticulitis with a short IV antibiotic treatment is possible and does not modify the recurrence rate in patients with uncomplicated diverticulitis.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Italian guidelines for the diagnosis and management of colonic diverticulosis and diverticular disease
    Marilia Carabotti, Costantino Sgamato, Antonio Amato, Benedetta Beltrame, Gian Andrea Binda, Bastianello Germanà, Gioacchino Leandro, Luigi Pasquale, Sergio Peralta, Maria Teresa Viggiani, Carola Severi, Bruno Annibale, Rosario Cuomo
    Digestive and Liver Disease.2024; 56(12): 1989.     CrossRef
  • Konservative Therapie der Divertikulitis
    Stephan K. Böhm
    coloproctology.2023; 45(3): 163.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic Imaging and Medical Management of Acute Left-Sided Colonic Diverticulitis
    Ethan M. Balk, Gaelen P. Adam, Monika Reddy Bhuma, Kristin J. Konnyu, Ian J. Saldanha, Michael D. Beland, Nishit Shah
    Annals of Internal Medicine.2022; 175(3): 379.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and Management of Acute Left-Sided Colonic Diverticulitis: A Clinical Guideline From the American College of Physicians
    Amir Qaseem, Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta, Jennifer S. Lin, Nick Fitterman, Tatyana Shamliyan, Timothy J. Wilt
    Annals of Internal Medicine.2022; 175(3): 399.     CrossRef
  • S3-Leitlinie Divertikelkrankheit/Divertikulitis – Gemeinsame Leitlinie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Gastroenterologie, Verdauungs- und Stoffwechselkrankheiten (DGVS) und der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie (DGAV)
    Ludger Leifeld, Christoph-Thomas Germer, Stephan Böhm, Franz Ludwig Dumoulin, Thomas Frieling, Martin Kreis, Alexander Meining, Joachim Labenz, Johan Friso Lock, Jörg-Peter Ritz, Andreas Schreyer, Wolfgang Kruis
    Zeitschrift für Gastroenterologie.2022; 60(04): 613.     CrossRef
  • Recurrence of Uncomplicated Diverticulitis: A Meta-Analysis
    Guhyun Kang, Soomin Son, Young-Min Shin, Jung-Soo Pyo
    Medicina.2022; 58(6): 758.     CrossRef
  • German guideline diverticular disease/diverticulitis
    Wolfgang Kruis, Christoph‐Thomas Germer, Stephan Böhm, Franz Ludwig Dumoulin, Thomas Frieling, Jochen Hampe, Jutta Keller, Martin E. Kreis, Alexander Meining, Joachim Labenz, Johann F. Lock, Jörg Peter Ritz, Andreas G. Schreyer, Ludger Leifeld
    United European Gastroenterology Journal.2022; 10(9): 940.     CrossRef
  • Treatment with Ceftriaxone in Complicated Diverticulitis Increases the Incidence of Intra-Abdominal Enterococcus faecium Detection
    Julius Pochhammer, Axel Kramer, Matthias Orth, Michael Schäffer, Jan Henrik Beckmann
    Surgical Infections.2021; 22(5): 543.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for recurrence after acute colonic diverticulitis: a systematic review
    Line Hupfeld, Jakob Burcharth, Hans-Christian Pommergaard, Jacob Rosenberg
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2017; 32(5): 611.     CrossRef
  • Acute colonic diverticulitis: an update on clinical classification and management with MDCT correlation
    Maxime Barat, Anthony Dohan, Karine Pautrat, Mourad Boudiaf, Raphael Dautry, Youcef Guerrache, Marc Pocard, Christine Hoeffel, Clarisse Eveno, Philippe Soyer
    Abdominal Radiology.2016; 41(9): 1842.     CrossRef
  • The Wind of Change: Uncomplicated Diverticulitis
    Hungdai Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(2): 43.     CrossRef
  • Intermittent bacteremia detected in an asymptomatic apheresis platelet donor with repeat positive culture for Escherichia coli: a case report
    Sandra Ramirez‐Arcos, Ted Alport, Mindy Goldman
    Transfusion.2015; 55(11): 2606.     CrossRef
Association Between a Close Distal Resection Margin and Recurrence After a Sphincter-Saving Resection for T3 Mid- or Low-Rectal Cancer Without Radiotherapy
Jae Woong Han, Min Jae Lee, Ha Kyung Park, Jae Ho Shin, Min Sung An, Tae Kwun Ha, Kwang Hee Kim, Ki Beom Bae, Tae Hyun Kim, Chang Soo Choi, Sang Hoon Oh, Min Kyung Oh, Mi Seon Kang, Kwan Hee Hong
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(6):231-237.   Published online December 31, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.6.231
  • 4,986 View
  • 23 Download
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

To maintain the patient's quality of life, surgeons strive to preserve the sphincter during rectal cancer surgery. This study evaluated the oncologic safety of a sphincter-saving resection with a distal resection margin (DRM) <1 cm without radiotherapy in T3, mid- or low-rectal cancer.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled 327 patients who underwent a sphincter-saving resection for proven T3 rectal cancer located <10 cm from the anal verge and without radiotherapy between January 1995 and December 2011. The oncologic outcomes included the 5-year cancer-specific survival, the local recurrence, and the systemic recurrence rates.

Results

In groups A (DRM ≤1 cm) and B (DRM >1 cm), the 5-year cancer-specific survival rates were 81.57% and 80.03% (P = 0.8543), the 5-year local recurrence rates were 6.69% and 9.52% (P = 0.3981), and the 5-year systemic recurrence rates were 19.46% and 23.11% (P = 0.5750), respectively.

Conclusion

This study showed that the close DRM itself should not be a contraindication for a sphincter-saving resection for T3 mid- or low-rectal cancer without radiotherapy. However, a prospective randomized controlled trial including the effect of adjuvant therapy will be needed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The Impact of Narrow and Infiltrated Distal Margin After Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer on Patients’ Outcomes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Islam H. Metwally, Mohammad Zuhdy, Omar Hamdy, Ahmed M. Fareed, Saleh S. Elbalka
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022; 13(4): 750.     CrossRef
  • Association of levels of metabolites with the safe margin of rectal cancer surgery: a metabolomics study
    Shaopeng Zhang, Guoqiang Pan, Zhifeng Liu, Yuan Kong, Daguang Wang
    BMC Cancer.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Distal resection margins in rectal cancer specimens: differences in assessment between surgeons and pathologists and the influence of neoadjuvant chemoradiation
    T. L. Ghezzi, C. Tarta, P. C. Contu, A. R. Lazzaron, B. M. Contin, L. M. Kliemann, D. C. Damin
    Updates in Surgery.2021; 73(5): 1787.     CrossRef
  • Surgical margins in squamous cell carcinoma, different for the vulva?
    Noortje Pleunis, Maria E.J. Leermakers, Anneke A. van der Wurff, Paul J.J.M. Klinkhamer, Nicole P.M. Ezendam, Dorry Boll, Joanne A. de Hullu, Johanna M.A. Pijnenborg
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2018; 44(10): 1555.     CrossRef
  • Continuous Effect of Radial Resection Margin on Recurrence and Survival in Rectal Cancer Patients Who Receive Preoperative Chemoradiation and Curative Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Analysis
    SooYoon Sung, Sung Hwan Kim, Joo Hwan Lee, Taek Keun Nam, Songmi Jeong, Hong Seok Jang, Jin Ho Song, Jeong Won Lee, Jung Min Bae, Jong Hoon Lee
    International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2017; 98(3): 647.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy and Safety of Low-Dose-Rate Endorectal Brachytherapy as a Boost to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Distal Rectal Cancer: A Phase-II Clinical Trial
    Shapour Omidvari, Shadi Zohourinia, Mansour Ansari, Leila Ghahramani, Mohammad Zare-Bandamiri, Ahmad Mosalaei, Niloofar Ahmadloo, Saeedeh Pourahmad, Hamid Nasrolahi, Sayed Hasan Hamedi, Mohammad Mohammadianpanah
    Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(4): 123.     CrossRef
  • Safe Distal Resection Margin in Patients With T3 Mid and Distal Rectal Cancer Who Underwent a Sphincter-Saving Resection Without Preoperative Radiotherapy
    Bong Hwa Lee, Hyoung Chul Park, Min Jeong Kin, Mi Young Jang
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(6): 219.     CrossRef
Diagnostic Accuracy of Elevated Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen for Recurrence in Postoperative Stage II Colorectal Cancer Patients: Comparison With Stage III
Ho Seung Kim, Min Ro Lee
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(4):155-159.   Published online August 29, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.4.155
  • 7,707 View
  • 47 Download
  • 9 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Elevated levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) following a curative resection of colorectal cancer (CRC) indicate recurrence; however, the levels of CEA may be elevated above the normal limit without recurrence. The aim of this study is to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of elevated serum CEA for predicting recurrence in postoperative stage II and stage III CRC patients.

Methods

A total of 336 stage II and stage III CRC patients who underwent a curative resection between January 2005 and October 2009 were enrolled. Sensitivities, specificities, positive predictive values (PPVs), negative predictive values (NPVs), likelihood ratios and post-test probabilities of recurrence associated with elevated CEA were analyzed and compared.

Results

The median follow-up duration was 45 months (36 to 134 months). Twenty-seven of 189 stage II patients (14.3%) and 52 of 147 stage III patients (35.4%) developed recurrence during the follow-up period. Sensitivities, specificities, PPVs, and NPVs of elevated CEA were 37.0%, 91.4%, 41.7%, and 89.7%, respectively, in stage II patients and 46.2%, 90.5%, 72.7%, and 75.4% in stage III patients. Post-test probabilities of recurrence associated with elevated CEA were 41.8% in stage II patients and 71.9% in stage III patients.

Conclusion

The predictive performance of the probability of recurrence associated with elevated serum CEA after a curative resection in stage II CRC patients is lower than that in stage III CRC patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Significance of carcinoembryonic antigen detection in the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Rui Wang, Qin Wang, Pan Li
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2023; 15(12): 2907.     CrossRef
  • Diagnostic accuracy of follow‐up tests for detecting colorectal cancer recurrences in primary care: A systematic review and meta‐analysis
    Geertje B. Liemburg, Daan Brandenbarg, Marjolein Y. Berger, Saskia F.A. Duijts, Gea A. Holtman, Geertruida H. Bock, Joke C. Korevaar, Annette J. Berendsen
    European Journal of Cancer Care.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Validation of Assaying Carcinoembryonic Antigen in Human Serum by Using Immunomagnetic Reduction
    Po-Li Wei, Long-Teng Lee, Li-Ming Tseng, Kai-Wen Huang
    Scientific Reports.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Gold nanoparticles in combination with megavoltage radiation energy increased radiosensitization and apoptosis in colon cancer HT-29 cells
    Alihossein Saberi, Daryoush Shahbazi-Gahrouei, Mahdi Abbasian, Mehrafarin Fesharaki, Azam Baharlouei, Zahra Arab-Bafrani
    International Journal of Radiation Biology.2017; 93(3): 315.     CrossRef
  • Time to lowest postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level is predictive on survival outcome in rectal cancer
    Huichuan Yu, Yanxin Luo, Xiaolin Wang, Liangliang Bai, Pinzhu Huang, Lei Wang, Meijin Huang, Yanhong Deng, Jianping Wang
    Scientific Reports.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The diagnostic accuracy of carcinoembryonic antigen to detect colorectal cancer recurrence – A systematic review
    Caspar G. Sørensen, William K. Karlsson, Hans-Christian Pommergaard, Jakob Burcharth, Jacob Rosenberg
    International Journal of Surgery.2016; 25: 134.     CrossRef
  • Blood CEA levels for detecting recurrent colorectal cancer
    Brian D Nicholson, Bethany Shinkins, Indika Pathiraja, Nia W Roberts, Tim J James, Susan Mallett, Rafael Perera, John N Primrose, David Mant
    Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2015;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Value of Dual Assessment of Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Fluorine-18-Fluoro-Deoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography in Colorectal Cancer Recurrence
    Saeed Mohammed Bafaraj
    European Journal of Basic Medical Sciences.2015; 5(2): 25.     CrossRef
  • Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen for Recurrence in Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Young Jin Kim
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(4): 137.     CrossRef
Case Report
Intramural Recurrence Without Mucosal Lesions After an Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Early Colorectal Cancer
Min Sung Kim, Nam Kyu Kim, Ji Hye Park
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(3):126-129.   Published online June 30, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.3.126
  • 4,638 View
  • 30 Download
  • 7 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

Advances in endoscopic instruments and techniques have enabled increased detection and removal of early colorectal cancer (ECC), which is defined as a tumor whose invasion is limited to the mucosa or submucosa. Some cases can be treated by endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). However, local recurrence frequently occurs after an EMR for ECC. The recurrence pattern is usually intramural recurrence with a mucosal lesion at the EMR's site. We report the cases of two patients with intramural recurrence without mucosal lesions after an EMR for ECC. These cases indicate that a local recurrence after an EMR for ECC can appear as an intramural recurrence without mucosal lesions at a previous EMR site or another site, although this presentation is very unusual.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Multidisciplinary Treatment Strategy for Early Colon Cancer: A Review-An English Version
    Gyung Mo Son, Su Bum Park, Tae Un Kim, Byung-Soo Park, In Young Lee, Joo-Young Na, Dong Hoon Shin, Sang Bo Oh, Sung Hwan Cho, Hyun Sung Kim, Hyung Wook Kim
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 203.     CrossRef
  • Growth-inhibition of S180 residual-tumor by combination of cyclophosphamide and chitosan oligosaccharides in vivo
    Xingchen Zhai, Shoujun Yuan, Xin Yang, Pan Zou, Yong Shao, A.M. Abd El-Aty, Ahmet Hacımüftüoğlu, Jing Wang
    Life Sciences.2018; 202: 21.     CrossRef
  • Handling and Pathology Reporting of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
    Bita Geramizadeh, David A. Owen
    Middle East Journal of Digestive Diseases.2017; 9(1): 5.     CrossRef
  • Feasibility of mesorectal vascular invasion in predicting early distant metastasis in patients with stage T3 rectal cancer based on rectal MRI
    Young Chul Kim, Jai Keun Kim, Myeong-Jin Kim, Jei Hee Lee, Young Bae Kim, Sung Jae Shin
    European Radiology.2016; 26(2): 297.     CrossRef
  • Antitumor Effects of Orally and Intraperitoneally Administered Chitosan Oligosaccharides (COSs) on S180‐Bearing/Residual Mouse
    Pan Zou, Xin Yang, Yanxin Zhang, Pengfei Du, Shoujun Yuan, Dexuan Yang, Jing Wang
    Journal of Food Science.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Re-evaluation of indications and outcomes of endoscopic excision procedures for colorectal tumors: a review
    S. Cai, Y. Zhong, P. Zhou, J. Xu, L. Yao
    Gastroenterology Report.2014; 2(1): 27.     CrossRef
  • Anticancer activity of tuftsin-derived T peptide in postoperative residual tumors
    Yinghong An, Linna Li, Dexuan Yang, Na Jia, Chengwang Xu, Qiong Wang, Shanshan Wang, Shoujun Yuan
    Anti-Cancer Drugs.2014; 25(8): 857.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Delorme's Procedure: An Effective Treatment for a Full-Thickness Rectal Prolapse in Young Patients
Mohammad Sadegh Fazeli, Ali Reza Kazemeini, Amir Keshvari, Mohammad Reza Keramati
Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(2):60-65.   Published online April 30, 2013
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.2.60
  • 7,500 View
  • 52 Download
  • 17 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Delorme's procedure is infrequently applied in young adults because of its assumed higher recurrence rate. The aim of this prospective study was to assess the efficacy of the Delorme's technique in younger adults.

Methods

Fifty-two consecutive patients were entered in our study. We followed patients for at least 30 months. Their complaints and clinical exam results were noted.

Results

Our study included 52 patients (mean age, 38.44 years; standard deviation, 13.7 years). Of the included patients, 41 (78.8%) were younger than 50 years of age, and 11 (21.1%) were older than 50 years of age. No postoperative mortalities or major complications were noted. Minor complications were seen in 5 patients (9.6%) after surgery. The mean hospital stay was 2.5 days. In the younger group (age ≤50 years), fecal incontinence was improved in 92.3% (12 out of 13 with previous incontinence) of the patients, and recurrence was seen in 9.75% (4 patients). In the older group (age >50 years), fecal incontinence was improved in 20% (1 out of 5 with previous incontinence) of the patients, and recurrence was seen in 18.2% (2 patients). In 50% of the patients with a previous recurrence (3 out of 6 patients) following Delorme's procedure as a secondary procedure, recurrence was observed.

Conclusion

Delorme's procedure, especially in younger patients, is a relatively safe and effective treatment and should not be restricted to older frail patients. This procedure may not be suitable for recurrent cases.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Long-Term Outcomes of Transvaginal Sacrospinous Ligament Suture Rectopexy
    Henry H. Chill, Alireza Hadizadeh, Angela Leffelman, Claudia Paya Ten, Cecilia Chang, Roger P. Goldberg, Ghazaleh Rostaminia
    International Urogynecology Journal.2025; 36(7): 1425.     CrossRef
  • Safety of concurrent transvaginal rectopexy at time of transvaginal apical prolapse repair: A comparative study
    Henry H. Chill, Sonia Gilani, Alireza Hadizadeh, Cecilia Chang, Nani P. Moss, Roger P. Goldberg, Ghazaleh Rostaminia
    European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology.2025; 312: 114512.     CrossRef
  • Management of recurrent external rectal prolapse. A single center experience
    Alessandro Sturiale, Lisa Fralleone, Bernardina Fabiani, Claudia Menconi, Vittorio d'Adamo, Gabriele Naldini
    Surgery Open Digestive Advance.2024; 14: 100137.     CrossRef
  • Delorme's procedure for urgent rectal prolapse – A video vignette
    A. Teresa Calderón Duque, Esther María Cano Pecharromán, Javier Broekhuizen Benítez, Laura Arriero Ollero, Lourdes Gómez Ruiz, Tomas Balsa Marín
    Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(3): 513.     CrossRef
  • External rectal prolapse: more than meets the eye
    M. Yiasemidou, C. Yates, E. Cooper, R. Goldacre, I. Lindsey
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(10): 783.     CrossRef
  • Delorme’s vs. Altemeier’s in the management of rectal procidentia: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pratik Bhattacharya, Mohammad Iqbal Hussain, Shafquat Zaman, Sophie Randle, Yousaf Tanveer, Nameer Faiz, Diwakar Ryali Sarma, Rajeev Peravali
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • What are the surgical options for recurrent rectal prolapse – retrospective single-center experience
    Tomasz Kościński, Krzysztof Szmyt
    Polish Journal of Surgery.2023; 96(1): 22.     CrossRef
  • Trends in the surgical management of rectal prolapse: An Asian experience
    Yvonne Ying‐Ru Ng, Emile John Kwong Wei Tan, Cherylin Wan Pei Fu
    Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2022; 15(1): 110.     CrossRef
  • Longer prolapsed rectum length increases recurrence risk after Delorme’s procedure
    Taro Tanabe, Emi Yamaguchi, Takuya Nakada, Risa Nishio, Kinya Okamoto, Tetsuo Yamana
    Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(4): 314.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Treatment of Full-Thickness Rectal Prolapse (FTRP): a Case Series Analysis
    Przemysław Ciesielski, Magdalena Szczotko, Małgorzata Kołodziejczak
    Indian Journal of Surgery.2021; 83(3): 634.     CrossRef
  • Procedimiento de Altemeier para la reparación de prolapso rectal tras resección anterior de recto interesfinteriana con escisión mesorrectal total por vía transanal
    Eloy Maldonado Marcos, Pere Planellas Giné, Júlia Gil Garcia, Ramon Farrés Coll, Antoni Codina Cazador
    Cirugía Española.2021; 99(5): 389.     CrossRef
  • Altemeier procedure for rectal prolapse after intersphincteric low anterior resection with transanal total mesorectal excision
    Eloy Maldonado Marcos, Pere Planellas Giné, Júlia Gil Garcia, Ramon Farrés Coll, Antoni Codina Cazador
    Cirugía Española (English Edition).2021; 99(5): 389.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy vs Delorme's operation in management of complete rectal prolapse: a prospective randomized study
    S. H. Emile, H. Elbanna, M. Youssef, W. Thabet, W. Omar, A. Elshobaky, T. M. Abd El‐Hamed, M. Farid
    Colorectal Disease.2017; 19(1): 50.     CrossRef
  • The evolution of evaluation and management of urinary or fecal incontinence and pelvic organ prolapse
    Scott R. Steele, Madhulika G. Varma, David Prichard, Adil E. Bharucha, Sarah A. Vogler, Askin Erdogan, Satish S.C. Rao, Ann C. Lowry, Erin O. Lange, Glen M. Hall, Joshua I.S. Bleier, Anthony J. Senagore, Justin Maykel, Sook Y. Chan, Ian M. Paquette, Marie
    Current Problems in Surgery.2015; 52(2): 17.     CrossRef
  • Komplikationen nach Rektumprolapsoperationen
    T.H.K. Schiedeck
    Der Chirurg.2015; 86(8): 747.     CrossRef
  • A systematic review of the literature on the surgical management of recurrent rectal prolapse
    A. Hotouras, Y. Ribas, S. Zakeri, C. Bhan, S. D. Wexner, C. L. Chan, J. Murphy
    Colorectal Disease.2015; 17(8): 657.     CrossRef
  • Outcome of the Delorme procedure for the management of complete rectal prolapse in children
    Mohamed Rabae
    The Egyptian Journal of Surgery.2014; 33(4): 260.     CrossRef
Association of Immune Status with Recurrent Anal Condylomata in Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Positive Patients
Ji Hyun Sung, Eun Jung Ahn, Heung-Kwon Oh, Sei Hyeog Park
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(6):294-298.   Published online December 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.6.294
  • 5,205 View
  • 47 Download
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

An anal condyloma is a proliferative disease of the genital epithelium caused by the human papillomavirus. This condition is most commonly seen in male homosexuals and is frequently recurrent. Some reports have suggested that immunosuppression is a risk factor for recurrence of a condyloma. Thus, we investigated the risk factors for a recurrent anal condyloma in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 85 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with and underwent surgery for an anal condyloma from January 2007 to December 2011. Outcomes were analyzed based clinical and immunologic data.

Results

Recurrent anal condylomata were found in 25 patients (29.4%). Ten cases (40.0%) were within postoperative 3 months. At postoperative 6 months, the CD4 lymphocyte count in the recurrent group was lower than it was in the nonrecurrent group (P = 0.023).

Conclusion

CD4-mediated immunosuppression is a risk factor for recurrent anal condylomata in HIV-positive patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effectiveness of physically ablative and pharmacological treatments for anal condyloma in HIV-infected men
    Sandra Vela, Sebastian Videla, Arelly Ornelas, Boris Revollo, Bonaventura Clotet, Guillem Sirera, Marta Piñol, Francesc García-Cuyás, Magdalena Grce
    PLOS ONE.2018; 13(8): e0199033.     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of fulguration combined with imiquimod cream on condyloma acuminatum, and the effect on immune functions and serums levels of IL-2 and IL-10
    Quan Chen, Ridong Yang, Aili Gao, Daoqing Zhong, Huilan Zhu
    Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine.2017; 14(1): 131.     CrossRef
  • Association of HIV Infection With Anal and Penile Low-Risk Human Papillomavirus Infections Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Amsterdam
    Camiel A.H. Welling, Sofie H. Mooij, Marianne A.B. van der Sande, Martijn S. van Rooijen, Wilma F. Vermeulen-Oost, Audrey J. King, Arne van Eeden, Daniëlle A.M. Heideman, Ineke G. Stolte, Maarten F. Schim van der Loeff
    Sexually Transmitted Diseases.2015; 42(6): 297.     CrossRef
  • Condylomes anaux dégénérés. A propos de 13 cas
    R. Lalej, S. Nadir, W. Hliwa, F. Haddad, W. Badre, A. Bellabah, R. Alaoui
    Journal Africain d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie.2013; 7(4): 196.     CrossRef
Review
Pelvic Exenteration: Surgical Approaches
Jin Kim
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(6):286-293.   Published online December 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.6.286
  • 8,941 View
  • 160 Download
  • 16 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

Although the incidence of local recurrence after curative resection of rectal cancer has decreased due to the understanding of the anatomy of pelvic structures and the adoption of total mesorectal excision, local recurrence in the pelvis still remains a significant and troublesome complication. While surgery for recurrent rectal cancer may offer a chance for a cure, conservative management, including radiation and chemotherapy, remain widely accepted courses of treatment. Recent improvement in imaging modalities, perioperative care, and surgical techniques, including bone resection and wound coverage, have allowed for reductions in operative mortality, though postoperative morbidity still remains high. In this review, the techniques, including surgical approaches, employed for management of locally recurrent rectal cancer are highlighted.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A radiologist's guide to the galaxy of complications post total pelvic exenteration for rectal cancers
    A. Guha, S. Gandhi, S. Mynalli, A. Baheti, P. Haria, A. Choudhari, A. Desouza, A. Saklani, N.S. Shetty, S. Kulkarni
    Clinical Radiology.2025; 80: 106719.     CrossRef
  • Propensity-score matched outcomes of minimally invasive and open pelvic exenteration in locally advanced rectal cancer
    Sameh Hany Emile, Nir Horesh, Zoe Garoufalia, Rachel Gefen, Justin Dourado, Ebram Salama, Steven D. Wexner
    Updates in Surgery.2025; 77(2): 267.     CrossRef
  • Quality of Life After Extended Pelvic Surgery with Neurovascular or Bony Resections in Gynecological Oncology: A Systematic Review
    Andreas Denys, Sofie Thielemans, Rawand Salihi, Philippe Tummers, Gabrielle H. van Ramshorst
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2024; 31(5): 3280.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes Following Treatment of Pelvic Exenteration for Rectal Cancer in a Tertiary Care Center
    Vijayasarathy S, Nizamudheen M. Pareekutty, Satheesan Balasubramanian
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024; 15(2): 420.     CrossRef
  • Radical resection of locally advanced and recurrent colorectal carcinoma involving major nerve resection: a systematic review of surgical, oncological and functional outcomes
    Justin A. Hawke, Samantha Regora, Amrish Rajkomar, Alexander Heriot, Helen Mohan, Satish Warrier
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Rectal cancer pelvic recurrence: imaging patterns and key concepts to guide treatment planning
    Akitoshi Inoue, Shannon P. Sheedy, Michael L. Wells, Achille Mileto, Ajit H. Goenka, Eric C. Ehman, Mariana Yalon, Naveen S. Murthy, Kellie L. Mathis, Kevin T. Behm, Sherief F. Shawki, David H. Bruining, Rondell P. Graham, Joel G. Fletcher
    Abdominal Radiology.2023; 48(6): 1867.     CrossRef
  • Application of minimally invasive approaches to pelvic exenteration for locally advanced and locally recurrent pelvic malignancy - A narrative review of outcomes in an evolving field
    Laura Casey, José Tomás Larach, Peadar S. Waters, Joseph CH. Kong, Jacob J. McCormick, Alexander G. Heriot, Satish K. Warrier
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2022; 48(11): 2330.     CrossRef
  • Feasibility and short-term outcome of laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection in rectal cancer at an University Center
    Thinh Nguyen Huu, Huy Tran Duc, Truc Thai Thanh, Vinh Pham Ngoc Truong, Viet Ung Van, An Le Trinh Ngoc, Kien Le Trung, Hung Tran Xuan, Bac Nguyen Hoang
    International Journal of Surgery Open.2021; 35: 100366.     CrossRef
  • State-of-the-art surgery for recurrent and locally advanced rectal cancers
    Mufaddal Kazi, Vivek Sukumar, Ashwin Desouza, Avanish Saklani
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2021; 406(6): 1763.     CrossRef
  • The Impact of Preoperative Immunonutrition and Standard Polymeric Supplements on Patient Outcomes After Pelvic Exenteration Surgery, Taking Compliance Into Consideration: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Sophie Hogan, Michael Solomon, Anna Rangan, Suzie Ferrie, Sharon Carey
    Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.2020; 44(5): 806.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Exenterative Surgery in Advanced Urological Neoplasms
    Colla Cunneen, Michael Kelly, Gregory Nason, Eanna Ryan, Ben Creavin, Des Winter
    Current Urology.2020; 14(2): 57.     CrossRef
  • CT findings after pelvic exenteration: review of normal appearances and most common complications
    Martina Sbarra, Maura Miccò, Miriam Corvino, Salvatore Persiani, Benedetta Gui, Valerio Di Paola, Riccardo Manfredi
    La radiologia medica.2019; 124(7): 693.     CrossRef
  • Utility of 18F-FDG-PET/CT imaging in patients with recurrent gynecological malignancies prior to pelvic exenteration
    Soyoun Rachel Kim, Yoo-Young Lee, Harinder Brar, Arianne Albert, Allan Covens, Ur Metser, Taymaa May
    International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.2019; 29(4): 816.     CrossRef
  • Anatomical Variations of Iliac Vein Tributaries and Their Clinical Implications During Complex Pelvic Surgeries
    Prapon Kanjanasilp, Jia Lin Ng, Krittin Kajohnwongsatit, Charnjiroj Thiptanakit, Thitithep Limvorapitak, Chucheep Sahakitrungruang
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2019; 62(7): 809.     CrossRef
  • Role of MR Imaging and FDG PET/CT in Selection and Follow-up of Patients Treated with Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecologic Malignancies
    Yulia Lakhman, Stephanie Nougaret, Maura Miccò, Chiara Scelzo, Hebert A. Vargas, Ramon E. Sosa, Elizabeth J. Sutton, Dennis S. Chi, Hedvig Hricak, Evis Sala
    RadioGraphics.2015; 35(4): 1295.     CrossRef
  • Exenterative Surgery for Advanced Prostate Cancer
    Michael E. Kelly, Danielle Courtney, Greg J. Nason, Des C. Winter
    Current Surgery Reports.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
Original Articles
Risk Factors for Repeat Abdominal Surgery in Korean Patients with Crohn's Disease: A Multi-Center Study of a Korean Inflammatory Bowel Disease Study Group
Kil Yeon Lee, Chang Sik Yu, Kang Young Lee, Yong Beom Cho, Kyu Joo Park, Gyu-Seog Choi, Sang Nam Yoon, Hanna Yoo
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(4):188-194.   Published online August 31, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.4.188
  • 4,905 View
  • 24 Download
  • 8 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the risk factors for repeated abdominal surgery in Crohn's disease (CD) patients after the first abdominal surgery. Prior studies have tried to identify the risk factors for postoperative recurrence in CD patients, but the results of the studies have been inconsistent. Furthermore, few data on the risk factors for repeated abdominal surgery are available.

Methods

Clinical data on CD patients who underwent abdominal surgery from January 2000 to December 2009 were collected from seventeen university hospitals and one colorectal clinic. Data from a total of 708 patients were analyzed to find the risk factors for repeated abdominal surgery in CD patients. The mean follow-up period was 72 months.

Results

The risk of repeated abdominal surgery was 3 times higher in young patients (below 16 years old) than in older patients (odds ratio [OR], 3.056; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.021 to 9.150); P = 0.046). Stricturing behavior at diagnosis was also a risk factor for repeated abdominal surgery (OR, 2.438; 95% CI, 1.144 to 5.196; P = 0.021). Among operative indications, only intra-abdominal abscess was associated with repeated abdominal surgery (OR, 2.393; 95% CI, 1.098 to 5.216; P = 0.028). Concerning type of operation, an ileostomy might be a risk factor for repeated abdominal surgery (OR, 11.437; 95% CI, 1.451 to 90.124; P = 0.021). Emergency surgery (OR, 4.994; 95% CI, 2.123 to 11.745; P < 0.001) and delayed diagnosis after surgery (OR, 2.339; 95% CI, 1.147 to 4.771; P = 0.019) also increased the risk of repeated abdominal surgery.

Conclusion

Young age (below 16 years), stricturing behavior, intra-abdominal abscess, emergency surgery, and delayed diagnosis after surgery were identified as possible risk factors for repeated abdominal surgery in CD patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Therapeutic strategies in Crohn’s disease in an emergency surgical setting
    Maria Michela Chiarello, Gilda Pepe, Valeria Fico, Valentina Bianchi, Giuseppe Tropeano, Gaia Altieri, Giuseppe Brisinda
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 28(18): 1902.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factors for Postoperative Recurrence in Korean Patients with Crohn’s Disease
    Sung Bae Kim, Jae Hee Cheon, Jae Jun Park, Eun Soo Kim, Seong Woo Jeon, Sung-Ae Jung, Dong Il Park, Chang Kyun Lee, Jong Pil Im, You Sun Kim, Hyun Soo Kim, Jun Lee, Chang Soo Eun, Jeong Mi Lee, Byung Ik Jang, Geom Seog Seo
    Gut and Liver.2020; 14(3): 331.     CrossRef
  • Prevalence and factors associated with re-laparotomy among patients operated in Debre-Markos referral hospital, north west Ethiopia: Retrospective cross-sectional study
    Yeneabat Birhanu, Debrework Tesgera, Henok Biresaw Netsere, Nurhusien Nuru
    International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences.2020; 13: 100249.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of missing data methods in clustered survival data using Bayesian adaptive B-Spline estimation
    Hanna Yoo, Jae Won Lee
    Communications for Statistical Applications and Methods.2018; 25(2): 159.     CrossRef
  • Patients with perianal Crohn's disease have poor disease outcomes after primary bowel resection
    Yoo Min Han, Ji Won Kim, Seong‐Joon Koh, Byeong Gwan Kim, Kook Lae Lee, Jong Pil Im, Joo Sung Kim, Hyun Chae Jung
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2016; 31(8): 1436.     CrossRef
  • The Clinical Features and Predictive Risk Factors for Reoperation in Patients With Perianal Crohn Diseases; A Multi-Center Study of a Korean Inflammatory Bowel Disease Study Group
    Jae Bum Lee, Seo-Gue Yoon, Kyu Joo Park, Kang Young Lee, Dae Dong Kim, Sang Nam Yoon, Chang Sik Yu
    Annals of Coloproctology.2015; 31(5): 176.     CrossRef
  • Crohn's disease in Korea: past, present, and future
    Kang-Moon Lee, Ji Min Lee
    The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine.2014; 29(5): 558.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and Endoscopic Recurrence after Surgical Resection in Patients with Crohn's Disease
    Yang Woon Lee, Kang-Moon Lee, Woo Chul Chung, Chang Nyol Paik, Hea Jung Sung, You Suk Oh
    Intestinal Research.2014; 12(2): 117.     CrossRef
Oncologic Outcomes and Risk Factors for Recurrence after Tumor-specific Mesorectal Excision of Rectal Cancer: 782 Cases
Sam Hee Kim, Ki Beom Bae, Jung Min Kim, Jae Ho Shin, Min Sung An, Tae Geun Ha, Sung Mok Ryu, Kwang Hee Kim, Tae Hyeon Kim, Chang Soo Choi, Jin Yong Shin, Minkyung Oh, Seung Hun Baek, Kwan Hee Hong
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(2):100-107.   Published online April 30, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.2.100
  • 5,080 View
  • 22 Download
  • 11 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The aim of this study was to analyze the oncologic outcomes and the risk factors for recurrence after a tumor-specific mesorectal excision (TSME) of resectable rectal cancer in a single institution.

Methods

A total of 782 patients who underwent a TSME for resectable rectal cancer between February 1995 and December 2005 were enrolled retrospectively. Oncologic outcomes included 5-year cancer-specific survival and its affecting factors, as well as risk factors for local and systemic recurrence.

Results

The 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was 77.53% with a mean follow-up period of 61 ± 31 months. The overall local and systemic recurrence rates were 9.2% and 21.1%, respectively. The risk factors for local recurrence were pN stage (P = 0.015), positive distal resection margin, and positive circumferential resection margin (P < 0.001). The risk factors for systemic recurrence were pN stage (P < 0.001) and preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level (P = 0.005). The prognostic factors for cancer-specific survival were pT stage (P < 0.001), pN stage (P < 0.001), positive distal resection margin (P = 0.005), and positive circumferential resection margin (P = 0.016).

Conclusion

The oncologic outcomes in our institution after a TSME for patients with resectable rectal cancer were similar to those reported in other recent studies, and we established the risk factors that could be crucial for the planning of treatment and follow-up.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Short-term outcomes of robotic tumor-specific mesorectal resection of rectal cancer: surgical techniques in mesorectal division using rolling division of the mesorectum
    Yushi Yamakawa, Nobuhiro Haruki, Nobuo Ochi, Reo Sato, Hiroyuki Asai, Tomohiro Kako, Takumi Kato, Mitsuki Nakazawa, Shuji Takiguchi
    Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(6): 3478.     CrossRef
  • Current Controversies in the Management of Locally Advanced Colon Cancer
    Mishal Gillani, Seth Alan Rosen
    The American Surgeon™.2023; 89(8): 3361.     CrossRef
  • Functional outcomes after sphincter-preserving surgeries for low-lying rectal cancer: A review
    Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Precision and Future Medicine.2021; 5(4): 164.     CrossRef
  • Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Evaluation by Magnetic Resonance Imaging after Neoadjuvant Therapy on Decision Making: Cancer Center Experience and Literature Review
    Alejandro Recio-Boiles, Hytham Hammad, Krisha Howell, Bobby T. Kalb, Valentine N. Nfonsam, Aaron J. Scott, Hani M. Babiker, Emad Elquza
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2020; 51(1): 254.     CrossRef
  • The feasibility of laparoscopic TSME preserving the left colic artery and superior rectal artery for upper rectal cancer
    Chi Zhang, Hao-tang Wei, Wenqing Hu, Yueming Sun, Qinyuan Zhang, Masanobu Abe, Zhuoran Du, Yingying Xu, Liang Zong, Xiang Hu
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Recurrence in patients with stage I colorectal cancer
    Patrick Ely Teloken, David Ransom, Ian Faragher, Ian Jones, Peter Gibbs, Cameron Platell
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2016; 86(1-2): 49.     CrossRef
  • Current methods in the treatment of rectal cancer
    L. Yu. Kazieva, E. G. Rybakov, S. I. Sevostianov
    Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya.2016; 22(4): 49.     CrossRef
  • TRANSANAL TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION FOR RECTAL CANCER (review)
    L. Uj. Kazieva
    Koloproktologia.2016; (2): 57.     CrossRef
  • Anastomotic leakage after curative rectal cancer resection has no impact on long-term survival: a propensity score analysis
    Sabrina M. Ebinger, René Warschkow, Ignazio Tarantino, Bruno M. Schmied, Lukas Marti
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2015; 30(12): 1667.     CrossRef
  • Determinants of recurrence after intended curative resection for colorectal cancer
    Michael Wilhelmsen, Thomas Kring, Lars N. Jorgensen, Mogens Rørbæk Madsen, Per Jess, Orhan Bulut, Knud Thygesen Nielsen, Claus Lindbjerg Andersen, Hans Jørgen Nielsen
    Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology.2014; 49(12): 1399.     CrossRef
  • A Circumferential Resection Margin of 1 mm Is a Negative Prognostic Factor in Rectal Cancer Patients With and Without Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
    Jong Seob Park, Jung Wook Huh, Yoon Ah Park, Yong Beom Cho, Seong Hyeon Yun, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee, Ho-Kyung Chun
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2014; 57(8): 933.     CrossRef
Clinicopathologic Factors Affecting Recurrence after Curative Surgery for Stage I Colorectal Cancer
Min Ae Keum, Seok-Byung Lim, Sun A Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Chan Wook Kim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(1):49-55.   Published online February 29, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.49
  • 6,417 View
  • 49 Download
  • 32 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The objective of the current study was to identify the clinicopathological risk factors affecting recurrence after a curative resection for stage I colorectal cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively studied 434 patients who underwent a curative resection for stage I colorectal cancer between January 1999 and December 2004. Postoperative oral chemotherapy was performed in 189 patients (45.3%). The following prognostic factors were correlated with recurrence: age, gender, preoperative carcinoembryonic antigen level, location of tumor, T stage, size of tumor, histologic differentiation, growth pattern, and lymphovascular invasion. The median follow-up duration was 65 months.

Results

The overall recurrence rate was 4.6% (20/434). The median time to recurrence was 33 months. Two-thirds of the recurrence occurred more than two years after surgery. Risk factors associated with recurrence were rectal cancer (P = 0.009), T2 stage (P = 0.010), and infiltrative growth pattern (P = 0.020). A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated that the infiltrative growth pattern was an independent predictor for recurrence. Tumor cell budding was observed in all pathologic reviews with recurrence.

Conclusion

Long-term follow-up is necessary for stage I colorectal patients with high risk factors like rectal cancer, T2 stage, and infiltrative growth pattern.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Is tumour location a dominant risk factor of recurrence in early rectal cancer?
    Roberto Rosén, Henrik Thorlacius, Carl-Fredrik Rönnow
    Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(2): 1056.     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for recurrence in stage I colorectal cancer after curative resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sung Hwan Hwang, Seon-Hi Shin, Yun Jin Kim, Jun Ho Lee
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2025; 108(1): 39.     CrossRef
  • Investigation of three alternative histopathological scoring methods at the invasive tumour front in colorectal cancer
    Walaiphorn Woraharn, Ashley McCulloch, Christopher Bigley, Phimmada Hatthakarnkul, Kathryn Pennel, Peter Alexander, Hester van Wyk, Antonia Roseweir, Jennifer Hay, Noori Maka, James Park, Nigel B Jamieson, Joanne Edwards, Campbell SD Roxburgh
    The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Tumor-Informed Circulating Tumor DNA for Minimal Residual Disease Detection in the Management of Colorectal Cancer
    Oluwadunni E. Emiloju, Michael Storandt, Tyler Zemla, Nguyen Tran, Krishan Jethwa, Amit Mahipal, Jessica Mitchell, Cornelius Thiels, Kellie Mathis, Robert McWilliams, Joleen Hubbard, Frank Sinicrope, Qian Shi, Zhaohui Jin
    JCO Precision Oncology.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Determinants of survival and recurrence in patients with stage I colorectal cancer
    Alimohammad Bananzadeh, Mahshid Bahadori, Mohammad Mohammadianpanah, Faramarz Pakravan, Sara Shojaei-Zarghani, Ali Reza Safarpour
    Frontiers in Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A systematic review of population‐based studies on metachronous metastases of colorectal cancer
    Karin Nyström, Louise Olsson
    World Journal of Surgery.2024; 48(6): 1521.     CrossRef
  • Survival outcomes of stage I colorectal cancer: development and validation of the ACEPLY model using two prospective cohorts
    Qingbin Wu, Pengju Chen, Chi Shu, Lin Chen, Zechuan Jin, Jun Huang, Xin Wang, Xue Li, Mingtian Wei, Tinghan Yang, Xiangbing Deng, Aiwen Wu, Yazhou He, Ziqiang Wang
    BMC Medicine.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk factors of recurrence in TNM stage I colorectal cancer
    Jin-Hee Paik, Chun-Geun Ryu, Dae-Yong Hwang
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 104(5): 281.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative recurrence in locally advanced rectal cancer: how does neoadjuvant treatment affect recurrence pattern?
    Ryosuke Okamura, Yoshiro Itatani, Yusuke Fujita, Nobuaki Hoshino, Shintaro Okumura, Kazuhiro Nishiyama, Koya Hida, Kazutaka Obama
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Immediate Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Non-Metastatic Colon Cancer: Phase I Trial Evaluating a Novel Treatment Protocol
    Mehraneh D. Jafari, Joseph C. Carmichael, Farshid Dayyani, Chelsea McKinney, Lari Wenzel, Jason A. Zell, Alessio Pigazzi
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2022; 21(2): 114.     CrossRef
  • The clinic factors in evaluating long-term outcomes of patients with stage I colorectal cancer
    Zechuan Jin, Qingbin Wu, Xiangbing Deng, Ziqiang Wang
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2022; 45(11): 2231.     CrossRef
  • Identification of high-risk stage I colon and rectal cancer patients: a retrospective analysis of a large Japanese cohort
    Yudai Fukui, Koya Hida, Nobuaki Hoshino, Daisuke Nishizaki, Ryosuke Okamura, Shinichi Yamauchi, Kenichi Sugihara, Yoshiharu Sakai, I. Takemasa, K. Hakamada, H. Kameyama, Y. Takii, H. Ueno, H. Ozawa, S. Ishihara, K. Takahashi, Y. Kanemitsu, M. Itabashi, T.
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(6): 1403.     CrossRef
  • Predicting liver metastases growth patterns: Current status and future possibilities
    Rui Caetano Oliveira, Henrique Alexandrino, Maria Augusta Cipriano, Filipe Caseiro Alves, José Guilherme Tralhão
    Seminars in Cancer Biology.2021; 71: 42.     CrossRef
  • Improved Outcomes and Staging in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Guided by A Molecular Assay
    Alexander R Gupta, Gavitt A Woodard, David M Jablons, Michael J Mann, Johannes R Kratz
    Future Oncology.2021; 17(34): 4785.     CrossRef
  • Tumor Size >5 cm and Harvested LNs <12 Are the Risk Factors for Recurrence in Stage I Colon and Rectal Cancer after Radical Resection
    Hye-Sol Jung, Seung-Bum Ryoo, Han-Ki Lim, Min Jung Kim, Sang Hui Moon, Ji Won Park, Seung-Yong Jeong, Kyu Joo Park
    Cancers.2021; 13(21): 5294.     CrossRef
  • High-grade intratumoral tumor budding is a predictor for lymphovascular invasion and adverse outcome in stage II colorectal cancer
    Andreas H Marx, Claudius Mickler, Guido Sauter, Ronald Simon, Luigi M Terracciano, Jakob R Izbicki, Till S Clauditz
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2020; 35(2): 259.     CrossRef
  • Factors influencing recurrence of stage I–III rectal cancer in regional Australia
    Lucy Haggstrom, Sharlyn Kang, Robert Winn, Soni Putnis, Elias Nasser, James Chen, Morteza Aghmesheh, Daniel Brungs
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2020; 90(12): 2490.     CrossRef
  • Pathological risk factors and predictive endoscopic factors for lymph node metastasis of T1 colorectal cancer: a single-center study of 846 lesions
    Chihiro Yasue, Akiko Chino, Manabu Takamatsu, Ken Namikawa, Daisuke Ide, Shoichi Saito, Masahiro Igarashi, Junko Fujisaki
    Journal of Gastroenterology.2019; 54(8): 708.     CrossRef
  • Influence of gross tumor morphology on clinicopathological profile of colorectal cancers
    Mudassir Ahmad Khan, Nisar A. Chowdri, Showkat Ali Bhat, Fazl Q. Parray, Rauf A. Wani, Asif Mehraj
    Current Medicine Research and Practice.2019; 9(5): 172.     CrossRef
  • Predictive Nomogram for Recurrence of Stage I Colorectal Cancer After Curative Resection
    Chan Kim, Woo Ram Kim, Ki-Yeol Kim, Hong Jae Chon, Seung Hoon Beom, Hyojoong Kim, Minkyu Jung, Sang Joon Shin, Nam Kyu Kim, Joong Bae Ahn
    Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2018; 17(3): e513.     CrossRef
  • Emergency resection surgery for colorectal cancer: Patterns of recurrent disease and survival
    Joe Littlechild, Muneer Junejo, Anne-Marie Simons, Finlay Curran, Darren Subar
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology.2018; 9(1): 8.     CrossRef
  • Identification of Recurrence—Predictive Indicators in Stage I Colorectal Cancer
    Jun Ho Lee, Jong Lyul Lee, In Ja Park, Seok‐Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    World Journal of Surgery.2017; 41(4): 1126.     CrossRef
  • Recommendations for reporting tumor budding in colorectal cancer based on the International Tumor Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) 2016
    Alessandro Lugli, Richard Kirsch, Yoichi Ajioka, Fred Bosman, Gieri Cathomas, Heather Dawson, Hala El Zimaity, Jean-François Fléjou, Tine Plato Hansen, Arndt Hartmann, Sanjay Kakar, Cord Langner, Iris Nagtegaal, Giacomo Puppa, Robert Riddell, Ari Ristimäk
    Modern Pathology.2017; 30(9): 1299.     CrossRef
  • Tumor budding in colorectal cancer—ready for diagnostic practice?
    Viktor H. Koelzer, Inti Zlobec, Alessandro Lugli
    Human Pathology.2016; 47(1): 4.     CrossRef
  • Loss of CDH1 (E-cadherin) expression is associated with infiltrative tumour growth and lymph node metastasis
    Sun A Kim, Kentaro Inamura, Mai Yamauchi, Reiko Nishihara, Kosuke Mima, Yasutaka Sukawa, Tingting Li, Mika Yasunari, Teppei Morikawa, Kathryn C Fitzgerald, Charles S Fuchs, Kana Wu, Andrew T Chan, Xuehong Zhang, Shuji Ogino, Zhi Rong Qian
    British Journal of Cancer.2016; 114(2): 199.     CrossRef
  • Recurrence in patients with stage I colorectal cancer
    Patrick Ely Teloken, David Ransom, Ian Faragher, Ian Jones, Peter Gibbs, Cameron Platell
    ANZ Journal of Surgery.2016; 86(1-2): 49.     CrossRef
  • Preoperative Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Prognosis of Colorectal Cancer. An Independent Prognostic Factor Still Reliable
    Giovanni Li Destri, Antonio Salvatore Rubino, Rosalia Latino, Fabio Giannone, Raffaele Lanteri, Beniamino Scilletta, Antonio Di Cataldo
    International Surgery.2015; 100(4): 617.     CrossRef
  • Factors affecting sphincter-preserving resection treatment for patients with low rectal cancer
    ZHENQIANG SUN, XIANBO YU, HAIJIANG WANG, MING MA, ZELIANG ZHAO, QISAN WANG
    Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine.2015; 10(2): 484.     CrossRef
  • Tumour border configuration in colorectal cancer: proposal for an alternative scoring system based on the percentage of infiltrating margin
    Eva Karamitopoulou, Inti Zlobec, Viktor Hendrik Koelzer, Rupert Langer, Heather Dawson, Alessandro Lugli
    Histopathology.2015; 67(4): 464.     CrossRef
  • Tumor budding in the clinical management of colon and rectal cancer
    Viktor H Koelzer, Inti Zlobec, Alessandro Lugli
    Colorectal Cancer.2014; 3(4): 387.     CrossRef
  • Clinical Management of Localized Colon Cancer with Capecitabine
    J. Quidde, D. Arnold, A. Stein
    Clinical Medicine Insights: Oncology.2012;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Early Detection of Colorectal Cancer, Is It a Guarantee for the Cure of Cancer?
    Kang Young Lee
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2012; 28(1): 6.     CrossRef
Single-incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Appendiceal Mucoceles: Safety and Feasibility in a Series of 16 Consecutive Cases
Ki Bum Park, Jun Seok Park, Gyu-Seog Choi, Hye Jin Kim, Soo Yeun Park, Jong Pil Ryuk, Won Ho Choi, You Seok Jang
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(6):287-292.   Published online December 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.6.287
  • 7,299 View
  • 34 Download
  • 16 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical feasibility, safety, and oncological outcomes of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery in patients with an uncomplicated appendiceal mucocele.

Methods

A review of a prospectively collected database at the Kyungpook National University Hospital from January 2006 to September 2010 revealed that a series of 16 consecutive patients underwent single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) for an appendiceal mucocele. Data regarding patient demographics, operating time, conversion, surgical morbidity, lateral lymph node status, and mid-term oncologic result were analyzed.

Results

The reported series consisted of 7 women (50%) and 9 men with a mean age of 61.6 years (range, 41 to 88 years). The mean operative time was 66.8 minutes (range, 33 to 150 minutes). Perioperative mortality and morbidity were 0% and 6.2%, respectively. Recovery after the procedure was rapid, and the mean hospital stay was 6.8 days (range, 3 to 22 days). Pathology revealed 12 lesions compatible with a mucinous cystadenoma and four others compatible with benign cystic tumors. All surgical margins were clear. In one case, an extra port had to be placed, and another case required conversion from SILS to a standard open laparotomy immediately after identification of the tumor because of a micro-perforation with focal mucin collection. With a median follow-up of 28.7 months, no re-admission or tumor recurrence, such as pseudomyxoma peritonei, was noted in 14 patients.

Conclusion

A single-port laparoscopic mucocelectomy should be safe and feasible and has the advantage of being a minimally invasive approach. Prospective controlled studies comparing SILS and conventional open surgery, with long-term follow-up evaluation, are needed to confirm the author's initial experience.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Appendiceal Neoplasms
    Wolfgang B. Gaertner, Shaun R. Brown, Michael Deutsch, Mehraneh D. Jafari, Mukta K. Krane, Vlad V. Simianu, Michael A. Valente, Amy L. Lightner, Daniel L. Feingold, Ian M. Paquette
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2025; 68(7): 815.     CrossRef
  • Appendiceal Mucocele - A Review of Literature with a Case Report
    Berislav Vekic, Rade Markovic, Aleksandar Cvetkovic, Bojan Stojanovic, Marko Spasic, Nenad Markovic, Mladen Pavlovic, Dusica Petrovic, Bojan Milosevic, Jasna Jevdjic, Maja Vulovic, Dalibor Jovanovic, Slobodanka Mitrovic
    Experimental and Applied Biomedical Research (EABR).2024; 25(3): 289.     CrossRef
  • Single-incision laparoscopic surgery compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery for appendiceal mucocele: a series of 116 patients
    Ho Seung Kim, Han-Gil Kim, Seung Yoon Yang, Yoon Dae Han, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim, Min Soo Cho
    Surgical Endoscopy.2022; 36(1): 244.     CrossRef
  • Mucinous appendiceal neoplasm: A case report
    Alexandru Chirca, Lucian Negreanu, Andreea Iliesiu, Radu Costea
    World Journal of Clinical Cases.2021; 9(7): 1728.     CrossRef
  • Actinomycosis of the Appendix Mimicking Cecal Tumor Treated by Single-Port Laparoscopic Approach
    In Soo Cho, Sung Uk Bae, Hye Ra Jung, Kyung Sik Park, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(2): 125.     CrossRef
  • Surgical Outcomes of Single-Port Laparoscopic Surgery Compared With Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Appendiceal Mucinous Neoplasm
    In Jun Yang, Minseol Seo, Heung-Kwon Oh, Jeehye Lee, Jung Wook Suh, Duck-Woo Kim, Sung-Bum Kang
    Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(4): 239.     CrossRef
  • The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Appendiceal Neoplasms
    Sean C. Glasgow, Wolfgang Gaertner, David Stewart, Jennifer Davids, Karim Alavi, Ian M. Paquette, Scott R. Steele, Daniel L. Feingold
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2019; 62(12): 1425.     CrossRef
  • Safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for appendiceal mucocele: a multicenter study
    Tae Kyu Kim, Jun Ho Park, Jeong Yeon Kim, Byung Chun Kim, Byung Mo Kang, Soo Kee Min, Jong Wan Kim
    Surgical Endoscopy.2018; 32(11): 4408.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic ileocecal resection can be applied for appendiceal cancer with an ileal fistula: A case report
    Junko Mukohyama, Yasuo Sumi, Kiyonori Kanemitsu, Hiroshi Hasegawa, Masashi Yamamoto, Shingo Kanaji, Yoshiko Matsuda, Kimihiro Yamashita, Takeru Matsuda, Taro Oshikiri, Tetsu Nakamura, Satoshi Suzuki, Yoshihiro Kakeji
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2018; 52: 120.     CrossRef
  • Minimally invasive appendectomy for resection of appendiceal mucocele: Case series and review of the literature
    Sonia T. Orcutt, Daniel A. Anaya, Mokenge Malafa
    International Journal of Surgery Case Reports.2017; 37: 13.     CrossRef
  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Mucinous Appendiceal Neoplasm Presented as Acute Appendicitis
    Ioannis Kehagias, Apollon Zygomalas, Georgios Markopoulos, Thanasis Papandreou, Pantelis Kraniotis
    Case Reports in Oncological Medicine.2016; 2016: 1.     CrossRef
  • Recommendations in the management of epithelial appendiceal neoplasms and peritoneal dissemination from mucinous tumours (pseudomyxoma peritonei)
    P. Barrios, F. Losa, S. Gonzalez-Moreno, A. Rojo, A. Gómez-Portilla, P. Bretcha-Boix, I. Ramos, J. Torres-Melero, R. Salazar, M. Benavides, T. Massuti, E. Aranda
    Clinical and Translational Oncology.2016; 18(5): 437.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic approach to mucocele of appendiceal mucinous cystadenoma: feasibility and short-term outcomes in 24 consecutive cases
    Ki-Jae Park, Hong-Jo Choi, Sung-Heun Kim
    Surgical Endoscopy.2015; 29(11): 3179.     CrossRef
  • Cholecystectomy: evolution of laparoscopic approach
    I. V. Mikhin, Yu. V. Kuhktenko, M. B. Doronin
    Endoskopicheskaya khirurgiya.2015; 21(1): 42.     CrossRef
  • IV. Les recommandations

    Journal de Chirurgie Viscérale.2014; 151(6): S15.     CrossRef
  • Distinguishing between acute appendicitis and appendiceal mucocele: is this possible preoperatively?
    B. Saylam, C. E. Güldoğan, F. Coşkun, V. Vural, B. Çomçalı, M. Tez
    European Journal of Trauma and Emergency Surgery.2013; 39(5): 523.     CrossRef
Case Report
Recurrent Renal Leiomyosarcoma Mimicking a Colonic Submucosal Tumor: A Case Report
Yun Jeung Kim, Hee Seok Moon, Eaum Seok Lee, Jae Kyu Sung, Hyun Yong Jeong, Ji Yeon Kim, Dae Young Kang
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(5):270-274.   Published online October 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.5.270
  • 4,328 View
  • 33 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

A primary leiomyosarcoma of the kidney is a rare, but highly aggressive, neoplasm, accounting for only 0.1% of all invasive renal tumors. Local or systemic recurrence is common, but a leiomyosarcoma is difficult to diagnose preoperatively. We recently encountered an interesting case of an unusual recurrence of a renal leiomyosarcoma. A 57-year-old woman visited our hospital complaining of lower abdominal pain. Four years previously, she had undergone a left nephrectomy. She had a primary leiomyosarcoma of the kidney that had been misdiagnosed as a renal cell carcinoma. Colonoscopy revealed the presence of a lesion similar to a submucosal tumor in the descending colon. Postoperative pathologic examination confirmed that the mass was a recurrent leiomyosarcoma. We report this unusual case and present a review of the literature.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • A Rare Case of Colonic Leiomyosarcoma in Association with Ulcerative Colitis
    Daisuke Akutsu, Yuji Mizokami, Hideo Suzuki, Masahiko Terasaki, Toshiaki Narasaka, Tsuyoshi Kaneko, Hirofumi Matsui, Tsuyoshi Enomoto, Taiki Sato, Ichinosuke Hyodo
    Internal Medicine.2016; 55(19): 2799.     CrossRef
Original Articles
Surgical Treatment of a Parastomal Hernia
Seung Chul Heo, Heung-Kwon Oh, Yoon Suk Song, Mi Sun Seo, Eun Kyung Choe, Seungbum Ryoo, Kyu Joo Park
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2011;27(4):174-179.   Published online August 31, 2011
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2011.27.4.174
  • 6,073 View
  • 35 Download
  • 9 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Parastomal hernia is a major complication of an intestinal stoma. This study was performed to compare the results of various operative methods to treat parastomal hernias.

Methods

Results of surgical treatment for parastomal hernias (postoperative recurrence, complications and postoperative hospital stays) were surveyed in 39 patients over an 11-year period. The patients enrolled in this study underwent surgery by a single surgeon to exclude surgeon bias.

Results

Seventeen patients were male, and twenty-two patients were female. The mean age was 65.9 years (range, 36 to 86 years). The stomas were 35 sigmoid-end-colostomies (90%), 2 loop-colostomies (5%), and 2 double-barrel-colostomies. Over half of the hernias developed within two years after initial formation. Stoma relocation was performed in 8 patients, suture repair in 14 patients and mesh repair in 17 patients. Seven patients had recurrence of the hernia, and ten patients suffered from complications. Postoperative complications and recurrence were more frequent in stoma relocation than in suture repair and mesh repair. Emergency operations were performed in four patients (10.3%) with higher incidence of complications but not with increased risk of recurrence. Excluding emergency operations, complications of relocations were not higher than those of mesh repairs. Postoperative hospital stays were shortest in mesh repair patients.

Conclusion

In this study, mesh repair showed low recurrence and a low complication rate with shorter hospital stay than relocation methods, though these differences were not statistically significant. Further studies, including randomized trials, are necessary if more reliable data on the surgical treatment of parastomal hernias are to be obtained.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Long-term outcomes after open parastomal hernia repair at a high-volume center
    Alexis M. Holland, William R. Lorenz, Brittany S. Mead, Gregory T. Scarola, Vedra A. Augenstein, B. Todd Heniford, Monica E. Polcz
    Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(1): 639.     CrossRef
  • Parastomal Hernia: direct repair versus relocation: is stoma relocation worth the risk? A comparative meta-analysis and systematic review
    Ahmed Abdelsamad, Mohammed Khaled Mohammed, Mohamed Badr Almoshantaf, Aya Alrawi, Ziad A. Fadl, Ziad Tarek, Nada Osama Aboelmajd, Torsten Herzog, Florian Gebauer, Nada K. Abdelsattar, Taha Abd-ElSalam Ashraf Taha
    Updates in Surgery.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Stoma-Related Complications: A Single-Center Experience and Literature Review
    Zalán Benedek, Loránd Kocsis, Orsolya Bauer, Nicolae Suciu, Sorin Sorlea, Călin Crăciun, Rareș Georgescu, Marius Florin Coroș
    Journal of Interdisciplinary Medicine.2022; 7(2): 31.     CrossRef
  • The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland consensus guidelines in emergency colorectal surgery
    Andrew S. Miller, Kathryn Boyce, Benjamin Box, Matthew D. Clarke, Sarah E. Duff, Niamh M. Foley, Richard J. Guy, Lisa H. Massey, George Ramsay, Dominic A. J. Slade, James A. Stephenson, Phil J. Tozer, Danette Wright
    Colorectal Disease.2021; 23(2): 476.     CrossRef
  • Prevention and treatment of parastomal hernia: a position statement on behalf of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland

    Colorectal Disease.2018; 20(S2): 5.     CrossRef
  • Repair of complex parastomal hernias
    G. S. Hwang, M. H. Hanna, J. C. Carmichael, S. D. Mills, A. Pigazzi, M. J. Stamos
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2015; 19(3): 127.     CrossRef
  • Systematic review of open techniques for parastomal hernia repair
    J. Al Shakarchi, J. G. Williams
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2014; 18(5): 427.     CrossRef
  • Korrektur der parastomalen Hernie mit Netz
    A. Lampel, N. Runkel
    Der Urologe.2012; 51(7): 965.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of Risk Factors for the Development of Incisional and Parastomal Hernias in Patients after Colorectal Surgery
    In Ho Song, Heon-Kyun Ha, Sang-Gi Choi, Byeong Geon Jeon, Min Jung Kim, Kyu Joo Park
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2012; 28(6): 299.     CrossRef
Effect of Diabetes Mellitus on Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer
Geum Youb Noh, Dae-Yong Hwang, Yoon Hee Choi, Yun Yong Lee
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(6):424-428.   Published online December 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.6.424
  • 5,885 View
  • 28 Download
  • 25 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Many studies have revealed that diabetes mellitus (DM) increases a person's lifetime risk of colorectal cancer and that DM is associated with a worse outcome of colon cancer, but this association is controversial. In this study, we intended to examine the relationship between DM and the long-term outcomes of colorectal cancer.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 657 patients who underwent surgery due to colorectal cancer between 1997 and 2004 at Korea Cancer Center Hospital. The operations were done by a single surgeon. With a median follow-up of 4.7 years, we analyzed differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between patients with DM and those without DM.

Results

Of the 657 patients, 374 (57%) were males and 67 (10%) had DM. There was no difference in age at diagnosis, sex and pathologic stage of colorectal cancer according to the presence of DM. There were no difference in the RFS and the OS of colon cancer between the patients with DM and those without DM. At 5 years, the RFS was 71.3% in diabetic patients vs. 70.4% in non-diabetic patients (P = 0.480), and the OS was 68.8% in diabetic patients vs. 75.0% in non-diabetic patients (P = 0.498). There was no difference in the median survival between the groups (9.6 years in the diabetic group vs. 10.6 years in the non-diabetic group; P = 0.495).

Conclusion

In this study, we did not find any relation between the presence of DM and either the recurrence or the survival in cases of colorectal cancer. More studies to elucidate whether the influence of DM is directly related to a higher rate of cancer recurrence or survival are needed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Diabetes and cancer: Optimising glycaemic control
    Nalinie Joharatnam‐Hogan, Daniel L. Morganstein
    Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics.2023; 36(2): 504.     CrossRef
  • The impact of the incidence of diabetic complications on mortality in colorectal cancer patients with diabetes: A nationwide study
    Woo-Ri Lee, Kyu-Tae Han, Yoon Jung Chang, Seojin Park, Woorim Kim
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effect of diabetes mellitus comorbidity on outcomes in stages II and III colorectal cancer
    Cheng‐Yao Lin, Chien‐Liang Lin, Wen‐Tsung Huang, Cheau‐Jane Peng, Shih‐Bin Su, How‐Ran Guo
    Asia-Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology.2022;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Effects of diabetes type 2 and metformin treatment in Swedish patients with colorectal cancer
    Jan Dimberg, Levar Shamoun, Kalle Landerholm, Dick Wågsäter
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2022; 28(19): 2148.     CrossRef
  • Diabetes mellitus and colorectal carcinoma outcomes: a meta-analysis
    Daniel J. Becker, Arjun D. Iyengar, Salman R. Punekar, Dalia Kaakour, Megan Griffin, Joseph Nicholson, Heather T. Gold
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2020; 35(11): 1989.     CrossRef
  • Socioclinical profile of patients seeking treatment for cancer in a Teaching hospital in east Delhi, India
    Utsav Gupta, MadhuKumari Upadhyay, Rahul Sharma
    Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care.2020; 9(6): 2763.     CrossRef
  • Postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen levels cannot predict survival in colorectal cancer patients with type II diabetes
    Chih-Sheng Huang, Chin-Yau Chen, Li-Kuo Huang, Wei-Shu Wang, Shung-Haur Yang
    Journal of the Chinese Medical Association.2020; 83(10): 911.     CrossRef
  • Utility of KRAS Gene and Clinicopathological Features in the Assessment of the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes in the Etiology of Colon Cancer
    Wedad Saeed Al-Qahtani, Ebtesam Al-Olayan, Fatimah Gh. Albani, Rania Saad Suliman, Nada Hamad Aljarba, E.M. Al-Humaidhi, Alanood S. Almurshedi, Dalia Mostafa Domiaty, Manal Abdullah Alduwish, Aljohara M. Al-Otaibi, Abdelbaset Mohamed Elasbali, Hussain Gad
    Global Medical Genetics.2020; 07(02): 035.     CrossRef
  • Survival and Glycemic Control in Patients With Colorectal Cancer and Diabetes Mellitus
    Nina J Karlin, Shailja B Amin, Heidi E Kosiorek, Matthew R Buras, Patricia M Verona, Curtiss B Cook
    Future Science OA.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk of colon cancer recurrence in relation to diabetes
    Jessica Chubak, Onchee Yu, Rebecca A. Ziebell, Erin J. Aiello Bowles, Andrew T. Sterrett, Monica M. Fujii, Jennifer M. Boggs, Andrea N. Burnett-Hartman, Denise M. Boudreau, Lu Chen, James S. Floyd, Debra P. Ritzwoller, Rebecca A. Hubbard
    Cancer Causes & Control.2018; 29(11): 1093.     CrossRef
  • High glucose induces epithelial‑mesenchymal transition and results in the migration and invasion of colorectal cancer cells
    Jiayan Wu, Jiayi Chen, Yang Xi, Fuyan Wang, Hongcun Sha, Lin Luo, Yabin Zhu, Xiaoming Hong, Shizhong Bu
    Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Optimal glycemic target level for colon cancer patients with diabetes
    Shin Jun Lee, Jae Hyun Kim, Seun Ja Park, So Young Ock, Su Kyoung Kwon, Young Sik Choi, Bu Kyung Kim
    Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice.2017; 124: 66.     CrossRef
  • The relationship between diabetes and colorectal cancer prognosis: A meta-analysis based on the cohort studies
    Bo Zhu, Xiaomei Wu, Bo Wu, Dan Pei, Lu Zhang, Lixuan Wei, Masaru Katoh
    PLOS ONE.2017; 12(4): e0176068.     CrossRef
  • Increased mortality for colorectal cancer patients with preexisting diabetes mellitus: an updated meta-analysis
    Jingtao Li, Jixi Liu, Chun Gao, Fang Liu, Hongchuan Zhao
    Oncotarget.2017; 8(37): 62478.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic factors and survival of colorectal cancer in Kurdistan province, Iran
    Mohammad Aziz Rasouli, Ghobad Moradi, Daem Roshani, Bahram Nikkhoo, Ebrahim Ghaderi, Bahman Ghaytasi
    Medicine.2017; 96(6): e5941.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Hyperglycemia on Survival and Infection-Related Adverse Events in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Were Receiving Palliative Chemotherapy
    Yong Joo Hong, Hye-Suk Han, Yusook Jeong, Jiwon Jeong, Sung-Nam Lim, Hyung Jin Choi, Hyun-Jung Jeon, Tae-Keun Oh, Sang-Jeon Lee, Ki Hyeong Lee
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2014; 46(3): 288.     CrossRef
  • High Glucose Modulates Antiproliferative Effect and Cytotoxicity of 5-Fluorouracil in Human Colon Cancer Cells
    Yi-Shing Ma, I-Ping Yang, Hsiang-Lin Tsai, Ching-Wen Huang, Suh-Hang Hank Juo, Jaw-Yuan Wang
    DNA and Cell Biology.2014; 33(2): 64.     CrossRef
  • Diabetes and prognosis in older persons with colorectal cancer
    J Luo, H-C Lin, K He, M Hendryx
    British Journal of Cancer.2014; 110(7): 1847.     CrossRef
  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Is Associated With Increased Mortality in Chinese Patients Receiving Curative Surgery for Colon Cancer
    Kuo-Hsing Chen, Yu-Yun Shao, Zhong-Zhe Lin, Yi-Chun Yeh, Wen-Yi Shau, Raymond Nienchen Kuo, Ho-Min Chen, Chiu-Ling Lai, Kun-Huei Yeh, Ann-Lii Cheng, Mei-Shu Lai
    The Oncologist.2014; 19(9): 951.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Diabetes on Oncologic Outcome of Colorectal Cancer Patients: Colon vs. Rectal Cancer
    Justin Y. Jeon, Duck Hyoun Jeong, Min Geun Park, Ji-Won Lee, Sang Hui Chu, Ji-Hye Park, Mi Kyung Lee, Kaori Sato, Jennifer A. Ligibel, Jeffrey A. Meyerhardt, Nam Kyu Kim, Antonio Moschetta
    PLoS ONE.2013; 8(2): e55196.     CrossRef
  • Diabetes Mellitus and Colorectal Cancer Prognosis
    Katherine T. Mills, Charles F. Bellows, Aaron E. Hoffman, Tanika N. Kelly, Giuseppe Gagliardi
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2013; 56(11): 1304.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Diabetes and Diabetes Treatments in Colorectal Cancer Mortality, Incidence, and Survival
    Peter T. Campbell
    Current Nutrition Reports.2013; 2(1): 37.     CrossRef
  • Pre-existing type-2 diabetes is not an adverse prognostic factor in patients with renal cell carcinoma: A single-center retrospective study
    Alessandro Antonelli, Nicola Arrighi, Serena Corti, Tiziano Zanotelli, Alberto Cozzoli, Sergio Cosciani Cunico, Claudio Simeone
    Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations.2013; 31(7): 1310.     CrossRef
  • The impact on clinical outcome of high prevalence of diabetes mellitus in Taiwanese patients with colorectal cancer
    Ching-Wen Huang, Li-Chu Sun, Ying-Ling Shih, Hsiang-Lin Tsai, Chao-Wen Chen, Yung-Sung Yeh, Cheng-Jen Ma, Che-Jen Huang, Jaw-Yuan Wang
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2012;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • The Association between Obesity and Colorectal Cancer
    Kevin Whitlock, Richdeep S. Gill, Daniel W. Birch, Shahzeer Karmali
    Gastroenterology Research and Practice.2012; 2012: 1.     CrossRef
Abdominoperineal Resection in the Treatment of Locally-advanced Low Rectal Cancer: Is Preoperative Chemoradiation Advantageous?.
Kim, Jeong Yeon , Kim, Jin Soo , Kim, Young Wan , Hur, Hyuk , Min, Byung Soh , Kim, Nam Kyu
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(2):129-136.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.2.129
  • 7,533 View
  • 9 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
An abdominoperineal resection (APR) has a poor prognosis. However, limited studies about the prognostic factors in APR and the role of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) have been performed even though in rectal cancer, the application of preoperative CRT provides better local control compared to postoperative CRT. The aim of this study was to identify the prognostic factors and the impact of preoperative CRT in patients who undergo an APR.
METHODS
A retrospective analysis was conducted with a total of 133 patients who underwent an APR, cT3, cT4, or cN(+) patients, for rectal cancer between January 1995 and October 2004. Fifty-one patients treated with preoperative CRT (Group 1) were compared with 82 APR patients treated with postoperative CRT (Group 2). Oncologic outcomes were compared between the two groups, and the clinicopathologic factors affecting the treatment outcomes were evaluated.
RESULTS
The median follow-up period was 61.2 mo (range 6 to 194 mo). Circumferential margin (CRM) involvement was significantly associated with local recurrence (LR) and with disease-free survival in APR patients (P<0.001, P=0.011). The 5-yr LR rate was significantly lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 (P=0.013) in the univariate analysis, but no difference was noted in multivariate analysis (P=0.315). In Group 1, CRM involvement, tumor size, and lymph node metastasis were significantly lower than they were in Group 2 (P=0.043, P=0.003, P<0.001).
CONCLUSION
For achieving adequate oncologic outcomes in APR patients, an adequate CRM should be acquired with an optimal operation. In addition, preoperative CRT would be helpful for high-risk APR patients with a threatening CRM margin, providing the benefit of tumor downstaging.
The Influence of Age on Survival and Recurrence after a Curative Surgical Resection for Colon Cancer Patients.
Lee, Cho Rok , Kim, Young Wan , Kim, Nam Kyu , Hur, Hyuk , Min, Byung Soh , Lee, Kang Young , Sohn, Seung Kook , Cho, Chang Hwan
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2009;25(6):401-409.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2009.25.6.401
  • 65,535 View
  • 13 Download
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
This study was performed to evaluate whether age was a factor associated with oncological outcome for colon cancer patients who underwent a curative surgical resection.
METHODS
A retrospective study of 2,125 colon cancer patients who underwent surgery between January 1989 to December 2004 was conducted. RESULTS: Of the 2,125 patients, 1,724 patients underwent a curative resection (R0). The patients with R0 were classified into three groups: group I (n=142) under 40 yr of age, group II (n=1,462) between 40 and 75 yr of age, and group III (n=120) over 75 yr of age. There were no significant differences in gender, tumor diameter, or postoperative complications among the groups. A history of hereditary colon cancer, advanced TNM stage (III, IV), and poorly- differentiated histology were more commonly found in group I. Adjuvant chemotherapy was administered less frequently in group III. In the survival analysis, the cancer-specific survival (CSS) and the disease-free survival (DFS) rates were not different between groups I and II. The CSS and the DFS rates of group III were significantly unfavorable compared with those of groups I and II. On the multivariate analysis, old age (group III), TNM stage, and preoperative CEA level were independent risk factors for CSS and DFS. CONCLUSION: In colon cancer patients, tailored approaches according to age, such as early screening in young adults with family history and proper patients selection for adjuvant treatment in old patients, could be needed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Overweight is Associated with a Favorable Survival in Patients with Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Cohort Study in an Asian Population
    Yang Won Min, Su-A Kim, Jun Hee Lee, Jin Young Kim, Dong Kyung Chang, Poong-Lyul Rhee, Jae J. Kim, Jong Chul Rhee, Young-Ho Kim
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2012; 19(11): 3460.     CrossRef
  • Analysis of the Prognostic Effectiveness of a Multivisceral Resection for Locally Advanced Colorectal Cancer
    Sejin Park, Yun Sik Lee
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2011; 27(1): 21.     CrossRef
Clinicopathologic Analysis of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors of the Colon and Rectum.
Choi, Sung Hoon , Kim, Seo Jeon , Choi, Yun Jung , Min, Byung So , Kim, Jin Su , Baik, Seung Hyuk , Kim, Nam Kyu , Kang, Jung Gu
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2009;25(5):323-333.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2009.25.5.323
  • 2,681 View
  • 9 Download
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
This study's aim is to investigate the clinicopathologic characteristics of colorectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and to evaluate the result of those tumors.
METHODS
We retrospectively reviewed 22 patients who had been diagnosed with primary colorectal GISTs and who had undergone a surgical resection between October 1996 and July 2008.
RESULTS
Colorectal GISTs accounted for 0.28% of all colorectal malignancies and 7.7% of all GISTs. Rectal GISTs (19, 86.4%) were more common than colonic GISTs (3, 13.6%). According to the National Institute of Health's (NIH) grading system, there were 1 (4.5%) very low, 5 (22.7%) low, 4 (18.2%) intermediate, and 12 (54.6%) high-risk tumors. The disease recurred in 7 patients (1 with intermediate risk and 6 with high risk). Recurrence sites were the liver (42.9%), the peritoneum (71.5%), and the lymph nodes (14.3%). Adjuvant imatinib therapy and/or radiation therapy were done for patients with microscopically positive margins of resection and high risk, of which one experienced a recurrence at 95 months after surgery. The five-year recurrence rates were 0% in the very-low-grade and low-grade groups, 33.3% in the intermediate-grade group, and 37.5% in the high-grade group. The five-year overall survival rates were 100% in the very-low-grade and low-grade groups, 66.7% in the intermediate-grade group, and 62.5% in the high-grade group.
CONCLUSION
Poor prognosis of colorectal GISTs was closely related to the tumor's histologic grade and size. Integrating surgery, molecular therapy, and radiation therapy might improve outcomes, but further study with more cases is needed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Transanal endoscopic microsurgery with alternative neoadjuvant imatinib for localized rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a single center experience with long-term surveillance
    Xueshan Bai, Weixun Zhou, Yunhao Li, Guole Lin
    Surgical Endoscopy.2021; 35(7): 3607.     CrossRef
  • Primary localized rectal/pararectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: results of surgical and multimodal therapy from the French Sarcoma group
    Thanh-Khoa Huynh, Pierre Meeus, Philippe Cassier, Olivier Bouché, Sophie Lardière-Deguelte, Antoine Adenis, Thierry André, Julien Mancini, Olivier Collard, Michael Montemurro, Emmanuelle Bompas, Maria Rios, Nicolas Isambert, Didier Cupissol, Jean-Yves Bla
    BMC Cancer.2014;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Efficacy of Imatinib Mesylate Neoadjuvant Treatment for a Locally Advanced Rectal Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor
    Kyu Jong Yoon, Nam Kyu Kim, Kang Young Lee, Byung Soh Min, Hyuk Hur, Jeonghyun Kang, Sarah Lee
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2011; 27(3): 147.     CrossRef
  • Multiple Colonic Metastases from Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Gwi Hong Jeong, Byong Duk Ye, Seung Jae Myung
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2011; 58(5): 288.     CrossRef
Prognosis and Recurrent Patterns of Sporadic Primary Colon Cancers According to Location.
Park, Jin Seok , Yu, Chang Sik , Kim, Chan Wook , Jeong, Kwang Yong , Shin, Ui Sup , Yoon, Sang Nam , Lim, Seok Byung , Kim, Jin Cheon
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2009;25(4):221-226.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2009.25.4.221
  • 2,374 View
  • 28 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
We aimed to compare the prognosis and the recurrence patterns of sporadic primary colon cancers according to the location of the cancer. METHODS: One thousand four-hundred eighty-three (1,483) stage II, III colon cancer patients who had undergone a consecutive curative resection between January 1989 and December 2003 were analyzed. Hereditary, synchronous, metachronous, and recurrent colon cancers were excluded. The right colon was defined as being from the cecum to the transverse colon, and the left colon was defined as being from the splenic flexure colon to the rectosigmoid colon. The median follow-up time was 63 (3-228) mo. RESULTS: Poorly differentiated and mucinous cell type tumors were more frequent in the right colon. T3 tumors were more frequent in the right colon. Lymph-node-positive tumors were more frequent in the left colon. The recurrence rate was higher in the left colon, but the patterns of recurrence were not different according to the tumor's location. By univariate analysis, age, preoperative serum CEA level, T-stage, N-stage, lymphovascular invasion, postoperative chemotherapy, and tumor location were significant prognostic factors associated with recurrence. By multivariate analysis, sex, preoperative serum CEA level, T-stage, N-stage, postoperative chemotherapy, and tumor location were significant prognostic factors associated with recurrence. The 5-yr disease-free survival rates were 84.0% for right colon cancer and 77.1% for left colon cancer (P=0.005). The recurrence rates for cancers in the sigmoid colon and the rectosigmoid colon were higher than those for cancers in the cecum and the ascending colon. CONCLUSION: The tumor's location was an independent prognostic factor for recurrence, but the pattern of recurrence did not vary with the tumor's location.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Survival analysis for colon subsite and rectal cancers: Experience from a single surgeon
    Inhwa Lee, Seung-Hyun Baek, Hyunsung Kim, Hong-Jae Jo, Nahm-Gun Oh, Sanghwa Ko
    Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology.2015; 11(2): 114.     CrossRef
Oncologic Impact of Extracapsular Invasion of Nodal Metastasis in Patients with Stage III Rectal Cancer.
Li, Ki Yoon , Shin, Jin Yong , Oh, Sang Hoon , Hong, Kwan Hee
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2009;25(3):186-192.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2009.25.3.186
  • 1,754 View
  • 7 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Extracapsular invasion (ECI) of nodal metastasis is reported to be a prognosticator of colorectal cancer. However, limited knowledge exists about the prognostic value of ECI in stage III rectal cancer.
METHODS
From January 1996 to June 2004, 202 stage III rectal cancer patients who underwent surgery were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups according to ECI (patients with ECI, ECIP, n=122; patients without ECI, ECIN, n=80). The potential prognostic factors were compared in a Cox model.
RESULTS
Of 916 positive nodes examined, ECI was seen in 46.7% of the positive nodes. The univariate comparison between the two groups revealed the five-year results after a median follow-up of 48.0 mo. The local control rate of ECIP did not show a significant difference from that of ECIN (77.0% vs. 85.4%, P=0.550). The disease-free survival rate and the overall survival rate differed for the two groups, with rates of 44.1% and 50.0% for ECIP and 70.4% and 63.2% for ECIN (P<0.001, P=0.049, respectively). The impact of ECI on the disease-free survival was confirmed in a Cox model. In a subgroup analysis, no significant differences in the recurrence and the survival rates were seen between the N1 ECIP and the N2 ECIN subgroups.
CONCLUSION
Although ECI is not a risk factor for survival and local relapse, ECI is a prognosticator of overall recurrence. Based on these findings, more aggressive adjuvant treatment seems to be needed for decreasing the overall recurrence in stage III rectal cancer with ECI.
Long-term Result of Surgical Treatment for Crohn's Enteritis.
Choi, Sang Ji , Choe, Eun Kyung , Park, Sung Chan , Park, Kyu Joo
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2008;24(6):409-416.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2008.24.6.409
  • 1,794 View
  • 7 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
We sought to determine the long-term outcome of surgical management for gastrointestinal Crohns's disease (CD) and to find out whether there is any improvement over the time period.
METHODS
We analyzed the records of the 102 patients who underwent surgery for gastrointestinal CD excluding perianal CDbetween 1978 and 2007. A cumulative surgical recurrence rate was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank tests.
RESULTS
The main sites of CD were ileocecal area in 54.5%, followed by small bowel (29.7%) and large bowel (7.9%). Common indications for operation were obstruction (25.7%), diagnostic purpose (20.8%), and failure of medical treatment (12.9%). The operation performed were ileocolectomy including right hemicolectomy in 53 cases (45.3%), small bowel resection in 38 cases (31.7%), and strictureplasty 12 cases (10.0%, including 11 cases combined with bowel resection). The average follow-up period after operation was 6.4years (range: 0.5~29 yr, median: 5.3 yr). Among all patients, 22 (21.6%) underwent operations for recurrence. The re-operation rate was higher in the younger patients group (age at diagnosis less than 25 years) (34.1% vs. 12.1%, P<0.05), and in case of the patients whose length of initial intestinal resection was less than 40 cm (27.9% vs. 7.7%, P<0.05). The overall cumulative re-operation rates at 5years, 10years and 15years were 15%, 25%, and 60%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
Despite recent advances in medical therapy, the cumulative re-operation rate of patients operated for gastrointestinal CD remains similar to our previous report in 1997.
Case Report
Re-anastomosis above a Preceding Anastomosis Made by a Low Anterior Resection.
Shin, Milljae , Yun, Haeran , Lee, Wonseok , Yun, Seonghyeon , Lee, Wooyong , Chun, Ho Kyung
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2008;24(4):287-291.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2008.24.4.287
  • 2,039 View
  • 5 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
Periodic colonoscopic checkup is needed for patients suffering from colorectal cancer, based on the property that a colorectal neoplasm often recurs synchronously or metachronously. Surgical management appropriate to the occasion should be taken in recurrent colorectal cancer. Particularly, recurring colorectal cancer closely above the prior anastomosis for a low anterior resection should be eliminated by using an abdomino-perineal resection, including the preceding anastomotic site or a new anastomotic creation. Under the latter instance, ample possibility exists for postoperative anastomotic stenosis or leakage by reason of insufficient blood supply to the segment between the earlier anastomosis and the later one. The authors report two cases of re-anastomosis for colorectal cancer just above a previous anastomosis taken by a low anterior resection for rectal cancer. In a 52-year-old male with a history of neoadjuvant concomitant chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) and low anterior resection for rectal cancer located at 6 cm from the anal verge, a new adenocarcinoma was detected 7 cm from the previous anastomotic site and 3 cm from the anal verge. Considering anal sphincter preservation, the re-anastomosis was made at the upper part of the preceding anastomosis. The patient experienced no surgical complications, such as anastomotic stenosis or leakage and functional defecation difficulty. In another patient, a 50-year-old male with a low anterior resection and adjuvant CCRT for rectal cancer 8 cm from anal verge, a new adenocarcinoma was detected in the colon. The new adenocarcinoma was located 10 cm from the anal verge and 8 cm from the previous anastomosis. The same surgical management was applied to this case, with the same postoperative result.
Original Articles
Prognostic Significance of the Circumferential Resection Margin in Invasive T3 Rectal Cancer.
Joo, In Ho , Jin, Sang Hwa , Bae, Ki Beom , Shin, Jin Yong , Choi, Chang Soo , Choi, Su Im , Hong, Kwan Hee
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2008;24(4):278-286.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2008.24.4.278
  • 2,545 View
  • 6 Download
  • 1 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Because depth of invasion by T3 rectal cancer can vary according to the extent of mesorectal invasion, the prognosis for invasive T3 rectal cancer is reported to be very different from that for minimal invasive cancer. Recently, with more emphasis on circumferential resection margin (CRM) status, the T stage, rather than the N stage, seems to be a more valuable prognostic marker in rectal cancer. Therefore, the aim of this study is to determine the prognostic significance of the CRM in invasive T3 rectal cancer.
METHODS
Through reviewing 324 consecutive patients with rectal cancer who underwent a curative resection between January 1995 and December 2002 at Busan Paik hospital, 195 patients with invasive T3 rectal cancer, who had not received preoperative neoadjuvant therapy were selected. The patients were classified into a negative CRM group (negative group, n=173) or a positive CRM group (positive group, n=22), and the patients were subgrouped according to the presence of lymph-node (LN) metastasis and CRM status as negative LN and negative CRM (L-/CM-), negative LN and positive CRM (L-/CM+), positive LN and negative CRM (L+/CM-) and positive LN and positive CRM (L+/CM+). All pathological specimens were re-reviewed by a single pathologist, and the distance between the most advanced edge and the outermost aspect of the specimen was re-measured by using a microscope. Local relapse rates, disease free survival, and overall survival were compared using the Kaplan- Meier method. Multivariate analyses to identify independent prognostic factors were performed using the logistic regression model.
RESULTS
Local recurrence rates in the positive group and the negative group were 38.6% and 15.3%, respectively (P=0.004, log-rank test). The multiple logistic regression model demonstrated positive CRM (hazard ratio 4.4, P=0.0007) and N2 nodal status (hazard ratio 2.4, P=0.02) as predictors of local recurrence. In the subgroup analysis, the overall recurrence rates and survival rates were, respectively, 12.3% and 86.5% in the L-/CM- subgroup, 53.1% and 50.3% in the L-/CM+ subgroup, 52.7% and 50.0% in the L+/ CM- subgroup, and 58.7 % and 33.8% in the L+/CM+ subgroup (log rank test for trend; P=0.0001 and P=0.0001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS
In the event of predicted CRM involvement in invasive T3 rectal cancer, adjuvant therapy should be performed to improve local control. Also, larger prospective studies are needed to clarify the prognostic role of the CRM in invasive T3 rectal cancer because the number of cases in this study was small, especially in the number of CRM positive cases.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison of short-term oncologic outcomes following laparoscopic versus conventional open surgery for rectal cancer
    Nak Jun Choi, Jong Han Yoo, Hong Tae Lee, Jae Ho Shin, Ha Kyoung Park, Min Sung An, Tae Kwun Ha, Kwang Hee Kim, Ki Beom Bae, Tae Hyun Kim, Chang Soo Choi, Sang Hoon Oh, Minkyung Oh, Kwan Hee Hong
    Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology.2013; 9(1): 17.     CrossRef
Colorectal Cancer Presenting as an Early Recurrence Within 1 Year after a Curative Resection.
Jung, Sang Hun , Kim, Hee Cheol , Kim, Ah Young , Choi, Pyong Wha , Park, In Ja , Yu, Chang Sik , Kim, Jin Cheon
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2008;24(4):265-272.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2008.24.4.265
  • 2,302 View
  • 14 Download
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
An individualized surveillance protocol based on stratified prognostic factors is needed for the early detection of recurrent disease. The aim of this study was to determine both the clinicopathological characteristics for early-recurring colorectal cancer and the impact on survival.
METHODS
From January 1996 to September 2000, 1,504 patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer were recruited. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate the time interval until first loco-regional or distant recurrence, and the secondary goal was the last survival status. Early recurrence was defined as recurrence within the first 12 months postoperatively. Clinicopathologic data and preoperative CT records were reviewed. The follow-up period was over 48 months.
RESULTS
The 5-year recurrence rate was 25.4%, and 39.5% of these were detected within the first 12 months postoperatively. In the multivariate analysis, the independent prognostic factors for early recurrence were cell differentiation (PD/MUC/SRC), lymphovascular invasion, and absence of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III and curatively resected colorectal cancer in stage IV. Inaccurate interpretation by a low-quality CT scan resulted in a stage III cancer being understaged preoperatively. The 5-year overall survival rate according to the recurrent time interval was significantly different (early recurrence: 7.4% vs. late recurrence: 23.6%, P<0.05). The resection rate was similar in both groups (early recurrence: 22.7% vs. late recurrence: 27.6%, P=0.392).
CONCLUSIONS
Colorectal cancer that recurred within 12 months showed more aggressive biologic behaviors and poor survival. Understaging caused by incomplete preoperative evaluation for disease extension may cause treatment failure.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Predictive factors and the prognosis of recurrence of colorectal cancer within 2 years after curative resection
    Jong Pil Ryuk, Gyu-Seog Choi, Jun Seok Park, Hye Jin Kim, Soo Yeun Park, Ghil Suk Yoon, Soo Han Jun, Yong Chul Kwon
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2014; 86(3): 143.     CrossRef
  • Advanced Neoplasm Detection and Its Associated Factors in Colonoscopic Surveillance of Endoscopically Resected Early Colorectal Cancer
    Soon Ha Kwon, Jin Woo Choo, Hyun Gun Kim, Seong Ran Jeon, Byung Hoo Lee, Tae Hee Lee, Wan Jung Kim, Bong Min Ko, Jin-Oh Kim, Joo Young Cho, Joon Seong Lee, Moon Sung Lee
    The Korean Journal of Gastroenterology.2013; 62(4): 219.     CrossRef
Pattern of Recurrences and Metastases after a Curative Resection for Primary Colorectal Cancer.
Park, In Ja , Kim, Hee Cheol , Yu, Chang Sik , Kim, Jin Cheon
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2008;24(3):207-213.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2008.24.3.207
  • 3,098 View
  • 39 Download
  • 3 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
We aimed to verify the pattern of recurrences or metastases after a curative resection for primary colorectal cancer. METHODS: From the prospective colorectal cancer database of Asan Cancer Center, 2,810 paitents who underwent a curative resection for primary colon (1,295) or rectal (1,515) cancer between October 1995 and December 2003 were studied retrospectively. Patients were followed for more than three years or until disease recurrence. Risk factors considered were age, gender, site of primary tumor, stage, histologic differentiation, and lymphovascular invasion. The mean follow-up duration was 60+/-29 months. RESULTS: Overall recurrence occurred in 546 patients (19.4%). According to stage, the recurrence rates were 4.7% (20/423) in stage I, 10.8% (128/1,185) in stage II, and 33.1% (398/1,202) in stage III. More than 70% of the recurrences occurred within 2 years of surgery. The most common metastatic site was the liver in colon cancer and the lung in rectal cancer. In colon cancer, recurrence was more common in left than in right colon cancer (P=0.012). In rectal cancer, local recurrence was the most common in lower rectal cancer and was more common in patients receiving abdominoperineal resection than in those receiving a sphincter-preserving operation. The liver was the most common site of metastasis within 2 years postoperatively, but metastasis to lung was significantly increased after the second postoperative year. Factors such as sex, T category, N category, and location of the primary tumor were identified to be independent risk covariates for recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of recurrences differed according to the characteristics of the primary tumor and varied with the follow-up period.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Effects of High-Dose Intravenous Vitamin C on Colorectal Cancer Recurrence: The Retrospective Study by Medical Records for 23 Years
    Junjung LEE, Jong Soon CHOI
    Korean Journal of Health Promotion.2024; 24(3): 101.     CrossRef
  • Clinicopathologic Factors Affecting Recurrence after Curative Surgery for Stage I Colorectal Cancer
    Min Ae Keum, Seok-Byung Lim, Sun A Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Chan Wook Kim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2012; 28(1): 49.     CrossRef
  • Oncologic Outcomes and Risk Factors for Recurrence after Tumor-specific Mesorectal Excision of Rectal Cancer: 782 Cases
    Sam Hee Kim, Ki Beom Bae, Jung Min Kim, Jae Ho Shin, Min Sung An, Tae Geun Ha, Sung Mok Ryu, Kwang Hee Kim, Tae Hyeon Kim, Chang Soo Choi, Jin Yong Shin, Minkyung Oh, Seung Hun Baek, Kwan Hee Hong
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2012; 28(2): 100.     CrossRef
Patterns of Recurrence and Prognosis in Patients with Intestinal Behcet's Disease Who Underwent a Bowel Resection.
Hur, Hyuk , Min, Byung Soh , Kim, Jin Soo , Lee, Kang Young , Park, Yoon Ah , Baik, Seung Hyuk , Sohn, Seung Kook , Cho, Chang Hwan , Kim, Jae Hak , Kim, Won Ho , Kim, Nam Kyu
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2008;24(3):166-174.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2008.24.3.166
  • 2,327 View
  • 15 Download
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
We aim to analyze the clinical course and the recurrence patterns after surgical treatment in patients with intestinal Behcet's disease and to determine the prognostic factors. METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with intestinal Behcet's disease who had undergone operations between 1979 and 2007 were analyzed. Clinical characteristics between the recurrent group (n=24) and the non-recurrent group (n=14) were compared. The cumulative recurrence rates were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the results were compared by using the log-rank test. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 120 months. The median age of the 38 patients was 36.5 years, and the patients included 26 males and 12 females. Recurrences after surgical treatment were observed in 24 patients, and reoperations were performed in 21 patients. The mean age at operation was 35.7 years in the recurrent group and was less than 43.4 years in the non-recurrent group (P=0.030). Clinical subtypes of Behcet's disease (complete or incomplete vs. suspicious) and the cause of operation (presence vs. absence of a perforation or fistula) were different between the recurrent and the non-recurrent groups (P=0.048, P=0.014, respectively). The 5-year cumulative recurrence rate and reoperation rate for all patients with intestinal Behcet's disease who underwent operations were 52.7% and 36.0%, respectively the clinical subtypes and the cause of the operation were significant factors affecting the cumulative recurrence and the reoperation rates.
CONCLUSIONS
Intestinal Behcet's disease demonstrates high recurrence and reoperation rates after surgical treatment. More careful follow up is needed to these surgical patients with high risk of recurrence and reoperation.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Short- and long-term outcomes of surgical treatment in patients with intestinal Behcet’s disease
    Min Young Park, Yong Sik Yoon, Jae Ha Park, Jong Lyul Lee, Chang Sik Yu
    World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2024; 16(2): 429.     CrossRef
  • Evidence-based diagnosis and clinical practice guidelines for intestinal Behçet’s disease 2020 edited by Intractable Diseases, the Health and Labour Sciences Research Grants
    Kenji Watanabe, Satoshi Tanida, Nagamu Inoue, Reiko Kunisaki, Kiyonori Kobayashi, Masakazu Nagahori, Katsuhiro Arai, Motoi Uchino, Kazutaka Koganei, Taku Kobayashi, Mitsuhiro Takeno, Fumiaki Ueno, Takayuki Matsumoto, Nobuhisa Mizuki, Yasuo Suzuki, Tadakaz
    Journal of Gastroenterology.2020; 55(7): 679.     CrossRef
  • Prognostic factors and long-term clinical outcomes for surgical patients with intestinal Behcetʼs disease
    Yoon Suk Jung, Jin Young Yoon, Jin Ha Lee, Soung Min Jeon, Sung Pil Hong, Tae Il Kim, Won Ho Kim, Jae Hee Cheon
    Inflammatory Bowel Diseases.2011; 17(7): 1594.     CrossRef
  • Response Rates to Medical Treatments and Long-term Clinical Outcomes of Nonsurgical Patients With Intestinal Behçet Disease
    Moon Jae Chung, Jae Hee Cheon, Seung Up Kim, Jae Jun Park, Tae Il Kim, Nam Kyu Kim, Won Ho Kim
    Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology.2010; 44(6): e116.     CrossRef
Postoperative Complications and Recurrence in Patients with Crohn's Disease.
Hong, Dong Hyun , Yu, Chang Sik , Kim, Dae Dong , Jung, Sang Hun , Choi, Pyong Hwa , Park, In Ja , Kim, Hee Cheol , Kim, Jin Cheon
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2008;24(1):13-19.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2008.24.1.13
  • 2,512 View
  • 19 Download
  • 4 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
This study was performed to assess postoperative complications and recurrence rates and to elucidate the risk factors in Crohn's disease (CD). METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken for patients who had undergone bowel surgery at Asan Medical Center between October 1991 and June 2006. Symptomatic recurrence was defined as the presence of symptoms related to CD that was subsequently verified by radiologic or endoscopic finding. Surgical recurrence was defined as the need for repeated surgery for enteric CD.
RESULTS
There were 160 patients with a mean follow up of 34 months (108 men and 52 women; mean age: 29.7+/-10.9). The most common indication for surgery was a complication of CD, such as intra-abdominal abscess (31.9%), intestinal obstruction (21.9%), and internal fistula (19.4%). Another frequent indication was medical intractability (23.8%). The types of surgical procedures were ileocolic resection (50.0%), small bowel resection (25.0%), total/subtotal colectomy (17.5%), and others. The cumulative symptomatic recurrences were 15.9% and 36.4% at 2 and 5 years, and the cumulative surgical recurrence was 13.6% at 5 years. The cumulative surgical recurrence was higher for stricturing-type CD than for penetrating-type CD (P=0.049). No other significant risk factor for recurrence was found in our study. Twenty patients (12.5%) had postoperative complications, such as intra-abdominal abscess, anastomosis leakage, obstruction, and wound infection. CONCLUSIONS: The postoperative complication and recurrence rates were acceptable. For stricturing-type Crohn's disease surgical recurrence is higher than penetrating type, but long-term follow up is needed to verify the risk factors for recurrence.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Patients with perianal Crohn's disease have poor disease outcomes after primary bowel resection
    Yoo Min Han, Ji Won Kim, Seong‐Joon Koh, Byeong Gwan Kim, Kook Lae Lee, Jong Pil Im, Joo Sung Kim, Hyun Chae Jung
    Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology.2016; 31(8): 1436.     CrossRef
  • Clinical and Endoscopic Recurrence after Surgical Resection in Patients with Crohn's Disease
    Yang Woon Lee, Kang-Moon Lee, Woo Chul Chung, Chang Nyol Paik, Hea Jung Sung, You Suk Oh
    Intestinal Research.2014; 12(2): 117.     CrossRef
  • The epidemiology and cost of surgical site infections in Korea: a systematic review
    Kil Yeon Lee, Kristina Coleman, Dan Paech, Sarah Norris, Jonathan T Tan
    Journal of the Korean Surgical Society.2011; 81(5): 295.     CrossRef
  • Long-term Result of Surgical Treatment for Crohn's Enteritis
    Sang-Ji Choi, Eun-Kyung Choe, Sung-Chan Park, Kyu-Joo Park
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2008; 24(6): 409.     CrossRef
Is a Short Distal Resection Margin of Less than One Centimeter in a Sphincter-saving Resection for Rectal Cancer Oncologically Safe?.
Cho, Min Jeong , Yu, Chang Sik , Park, In Ja , Jeong, Sang Hoon , Chae, Pheung Ha , Hong, Dong Heun , Kim, Dea Dong , Kim, Hee Cheol , Kim, Jin Cheon
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2007;23(6):454-459.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2007.23.6.454
  • 1,935 View
  • 7 Download
AbstractAbstract PDF
PURPOSE
Sphincter preservation is one of the main goals in the treatment of rectal cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the oncologic safety of a sphincter-saving resection with a distal resection margin of less than 1 cm.
METHODS
Two hundred forty-eight patients who underwent a sphincter-saving resection between June 1989 and December 2002 and who had a confirmed distal resection margin of less than 1 cm on pathologic examination were included. All patients were evaluated for local and systemic recurrences.
RESULTS
The median follow-up period was 45 (6~144) months. The mean length of distal resection margin was 0.79+/-0.26 cm. Lower rectalcancer was most common (56.5%). Forty patients (16.1%) experienced recurrence. The local recurrence rate was 3.6%, systemic recurrence rate was 11.7%, and the combined local and systemic recurrence rate was 0.4%. In systemic recurrence, the liver was the most common site, followed by the lung. Among stage II & III groups, patients who underwent adjuvant chemoradiotherapy experienced significantly lower local recurrence compared to patients in the chemotherapy-only or the no-adjuvant group (2.6%, 12.9%, 8.7%, P=0.05). The length of distal resection margin, the total mesorectal excision, the location of tumor, sex, histology, and stage were not associated with local recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS
A distal resection margin of less than 1 cm in a sphincter-saving resection showed acceptableoncologic outcomes. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy were beneficial to reduce local recurrence in the stage II and the stage III groups.

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP