Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Original Articles

Minimally invasive surgery

Propensity score–matched comparison of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery using hinotori and da Vinci: Hidetoshi Katsuno, Koji Morohara, Tomoyoshi Endo, Kenji Kikuchi, Kenichi Nakamura, Kazuhiro Matsuo, Takahiko Higashiguchi, Tetsuya Koide, Hiromi Kanai, Satoshi Arakawa, Tsunekazu Hanai, Zenichi Morise; Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(4):310-318. Published online August 25, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00136.0019

2,134 View
36 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Citations

Purpose
The hinotori Surgical Robot System (hereafter “hinotori”) is a novel platform for robot-assisted surgery, while the da Vinci Surgical System (“da Vinci”) remains the field standard. This study compared short-term surgical outcomes of rectal cancer surgery between these systems using propensity score–matched analysis.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted of 209 consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery with the da Vinci and 58 patients with the hinotori system. After 2:1 propensity score matching, 108 da Vinci and 54 hinotori cases were included. Surgical outcomes, including operative time, blood loss, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and pathological findings, were compared.
Results
After matching, the baseline demographics were well balanced between groups. The hinotori system was associated with significantly longer operative time (266 minutes vs. 227 minutes, P=0.014) and console time (156 minutes vs. 110 minutes, P=0.001). However, estimated blood loss and postoperative complication rate did not differ significantly. Pathological findings, including the number of lymph nodes retrieved and the incidence of positive surgical margins, were comparable between systems.
Conclusion
In rectal surgery, the hinotori system demonstrates comparable short-term safety outcomes to da Vinci. Despite longer operative times and limited integrated instrumentation, hinotori‐assisted procedures may be feasible in selected patients. Further research should address long-term oncological outcomes and strategies to improve procedural efficiency.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Racing toward the future of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: a comparative study of hinotori and da Vinci
Sung Uk Bae
Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(4): 259. CrossRef

Minimally invasive surgery

Robotic surgery may lead to reduced postoperative inflammatory stress in colon cancer: a propensity score–matched analysis: Eun Ji Park, Gyong Tae Noh, Yong Joon Lee, Min Young Park, Seung Yoon Yang, Yoon Dae Han, Min Soo Cho, Hyuk Hur, Kang Young Lee, Byung Soh Min; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(6):594-601. Published online December 6, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00171.0024

3,021 View
87 Download
3 Web of Science
2 Citations

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
Robot-assisted surgery is readily applied to every type of colorectal surgeries. However, studies showing the safety and feasibility of robotic surgery (RS) have dealt with rectal cancer more than colon cancer. This study aimed to investigate how technical advantages of RS can translate into actual clinical outcomes that represent postoperative systemic response.
Methods
This study retrospectively reviewed consecutive cases in a single tertiary medical center in Korea. Patients with primary colon cancer who underwent curative resection between 2006 and 2012 were included. Propensity score matching was done to adjust baseline patient characteristics (age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, tumor profile, pathologic stage, operating surgeon, surgery extent) between open surgery (OS), laparoscopic surgery (LS), and RS groups.
Results
After propensity score matching, there were 66 patients in each group for analysis, and there was no significant differences in baseline patient characteristics. Maximal postoperative leukocyte count was lowest in the RS group and highest in the OS group (P=0.021). Similar results were observed for postoperative neutrophil count (P=0.024). Postoperative prognostic nutritional index was highest in the RS group and lowest in the OS group (P<0.001). The time taken to first flatus and soft diet resumption was longest in the OS group and shortest in the RS group (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). Among all groups, other short-term postoperative outcomes such as hospital stay and complications did not show significant difference, and oncological survival results were similar.
Conclusion
Better postoperative inflammatory indices in the RS group may correlate with their faster recovery of bowel motility and diet resumption compared to LS and OS groups.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Übergangsphase zur roboterassistierten Chirurgie beim kolorektalen Karzinom: eine vergleichende konsekutive Kohortenstudie
U. A. Dietz, M. Kalisvaart, S. Maksimovic, R. Frey, M. Ramser, B. M. Erhart, U. Pfefferkorn
Die Chirurgie.2025; 96(11): 942. CrossRef
Comparative clinical efficacy of three surgical modalities for the treatment of malignant tumours of the left hemicolon
Hao Chen, Dong-Ping Han, Jian-Yang Xiong, Zhen-Sheng Li, Teng-Cheng Hu, Zheng-Rong Li, Yi Cao
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef

Colorectal cancer

Partial mesorectal excision can be a primary option for middle rectal cancer: a propensity score–matched retrospective analysis: Ee Jin Kim, Chan Wook Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Yong Sik Yoon, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu, Jin Cheon Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(3):253-267. Published online March 31, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00689.0098

5,633 View
220 Download
1 Web of Science
2 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
Although partial mesorectal excision (PME) and total mesorectal excision (TME) is primarily indicated for the upper and lower rectal cancer, respectively, few studies have evaluated whether PME or TME is more optimal for middle rectal cancer.
Methods
This study included 671 patients with middle and upper rectal cancer who underwent robot-assisted PME or TME. The 2 groups were optimized by propensity score matching of sex, age, clinical stage, tumor location, and neoadjuvant treatment.
Results
Complete mesorectal excision was achieved in 617 of 671 patients (92.0%), without showing a difference between the PME and TME groups. Local recurrence rate (5.3% vs. 4.3%, P>0.999) and systemic recurrence rate (8.5% vs. 16.0%, P=0.181) also did not differ between the 2 groups, in patients with middle and upper rectal cancer. The 5-year disease-free survival (81.4% vs. 74.0%, P=0.537) and overall survival (88.0% vs. 81.1%, P=0.847) also did not differ between the PME and TME groups, confined to middle rectal cancer. Moreover, 5-year recurrence and survival rates were not affected by distal resection margins of 2 cm (P=0.112) to 4 cm (P>0.999), regardless of pathological stages. Postoperative complication rate was higher in the TME than in the PME group (21.4% vs. 14.5%, P=0.027). Incontinence was independently associated with TME (odds ratio [OR], 2.009; 95% confidence interval, 1.015–3.975; P=0.045), along with older age (OR, 4.366, P<0.001) and prolonged operation time (OR, 2.196; P=0.500).
Conclusion
PME can be primarily recommended for patients with middle rectal cancer with lower margin of >5 cm from the anal verge.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Review of definition and treatment of upper rectal cancer
Elias Karam, Fabien Fredon, Yassine Eid, Olivier Muller, Marie Besson, Nicolas Michot, Urs Giger-Pabst, Arnaud Alves, Mehdi Ouaissi
Surgical Oncology.2024; 57: 102145. CrossRef
Tumour-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and functional outcomes
Fabio Carbone, Wanda Petz, Simona Borin, Emilio Bertani, Stefano de Pascale, Maria Giulia Zampino, Uberto Fumagalli Romario
European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 49(11): 107069. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search