Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Original Articles

Minimally invasive surgery

Expanding the boundaries of minimally invasive surgery: the feasibility of robotic natural orifice transluminal extraction colectomy and robotic no-incision colectomy in colorectal practice: Thalia Petropoulou, Kyriacos Evangelou, Andreas Polydorou; Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(4):346-353. Published online August 28, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00647.0092

1,462 View
30 Download
2 Citations

Purpose
Minimally invasive surgery offers reduced trauma, accelerated recovery, and shorter hospital stays. Robotic technology further enhances laparoscopic precision, particularly in colorectal procedures. This study investigated the safety and effectiveness of robotic natural orifice transluminal extraction colectomy (R-NOTEC) and robotic no-incision colectomy (R-NIC), comparing these techniques to the conventional robotic colectomy.
Methods
Outcomes of patients undergoing robotic-assisted colorectal resection—either conventional robotic colectomy or R-NOTEC/R-NIC—using a single docking technique at a tertiary hospital over 3 years were analyzed. All patients were managed according to established Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols.
Results
In total, 100 patients were included, with 25 receiving R-NOTEC or R-NIC. The median age was 65 years (range, 30–82 years), and the median body mass index was 31.0 kg/m2 (range, 20.1–43.0 kg/m2). The median length of stay was significantly shorter in the R-NOTEC/R-NIC group than in the conventional robotic group (2.0 days vs. 3.4 days, P=0.021). Other outcomes, such as circumferential resection margin status, lymph node yield, and mortality, were similar between groups. The R-NOTEC/R-NIC group exhibited a slightly lower complication rate, as well as less opioid use. No conversions to open surgery occurred in either group.
Conclusion
R-NOTEC/R-NIC offer significant promise in colorectal surgery by minimizing trauma, expediting recovery, and maintaining oncologic safety. Nevertheless, these procedures require specialized surgical expertise and careful patient selection. Further research should focus on long-term outcomes and standardization of these techniques.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Robotic-Assisted Surgery in Emergency General Surgery: A Prospective, Single-Center, Case Series
Thalia Petropoulou, Kyriacos Evangelou, Andreas Polydorou
Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Colectomy: Evaluating Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Recovery in Modern Surgical Practice
Vaseem Akram Vadhooth, Krishnaprasad K, Priyanka L Reddy, Sailesh Kumar S
Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef

Minimally invasive surgery

Propensity score–matched comparison of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery using hinotori and da Vinci: Hidetoshi Katsuno, Koji Morohara, Tomoyoshi Endo, Kenji Kikuchi, Kenichi Nakamura, Kazuhiro Matsuo, Takahiko Higashiguchi, Tetsuya Koide, Hiromi Kanai, Satoshi Arakawa, Tsunekazu Hanai, Zenichi Morise; Ann Coloproctol. 2025;41(4):310-318. Published online August 25, 2025; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2025.00136.0019

2,774 View
48 Download
1 Web of Science
1 Citations

Graphical Abstract Abstract PDF

Purpose
The hinotori Surgical Robot System (hereafter “hinotori”) is a novel platform for robot-assisted surgery, while the da Vinci Surgical System (“da Vinci”) remains the field standard. This study compared short-term surgical outcomes of rectal cancer surgery between these systems using propensity score–matched analysis.
Methods
A retrospective analysis was conducted of 209 consecutive patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery with the da Vinci and 58 patients with the hinotori system. After 2:1 propensity score matching, 108 da Vinci and 54 hinotori cases were included. Surgical outcomes, including operative time, blood loss, postoperative complications, length of hospital stay, and pathological findings, were compared.
Results
After matching, the baseline demographics were well balanced between groups. The hinotori system was associated with significantly longer operative time (266 minutes vs. 227 minutes, P=0.014) and console time (156 minutes vs. 110 minutes, P=0.001). However, estimated blood loss and postoperative complication rate did not differ significantly. Pathological findings, including the number of lymph nodes retrieved and the incidence of positive surgical margins, were comparable between systems.
Conclusion
In rectal surgery, the hinotori system demonstrates comparable short-term safety outcomes to da Vinci. Despite longer operative times and limited integrated instrumentation, hinotori‐assisted procedures may be feasible in selected patients. Further research should address long-term oncological outcomes and strategies to improve procedural efficiency.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Racing toward the future of robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery: a comparative study of hinotori and da Vinci
Sung Uk Bae
Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(4): 259. CrossRef

Minimally invasive surgery

Robotic surgery may lead to reduced postoperative inflammatory stress in colon cancer: a propensity score–matched analysis: Eun Ji Park, Gyong Tae Noh, Yong Joon Lee, Min Young Park, Seung Yoon Yang, Yoon Dae Han, Min Soo Cho, Hyuk Hur, Kang Young Lee, Byung Soh Min; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(6):594-601. Published online December 6, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00171.0024

3,314 View
91 Download
5 Web of Science
6 Citations

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
Robot-assisted surgery is readily applied to every type of colorectal surgeries. However, studies showing the safety and feasibility of robotic surgery (RS) have dealt with rectal cancer more than colon cancer. This study aimed to investigate how technical advantages of RS can translate into actual clinical outcomes that represent postoperative systemic response.
Methods
This study retrospectively reviewed consecutive cases in a single tertiary medical center in Korea. Patients with primary colon cancer who underwent curative resection between 2006 and 2012 were included. Propensity score matching was done to adjust baseline patient characteristics (age, sex, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, tumor profile, pathologic stage, operating surgeon, surgery extent) between open surgery (OS), laparoscopic surgery (LS), and RS groups.
Results
After propensity score matching, there were 66 patients in each group for analysis, and there was no significant differences in baseline patient characteristics. Maximal postoperative leukocyte count was lowest in the RS group and highest in the OS group (P=0.021). Similar results were observed for postoperative neutrophil count (P=0.024). Postoperative prognostic nutritional index was highest in the RS group and lowest in the OS group (P<0.001). The time taken to first flatus and soft diet resumption was longest in the OS group and shortest in the RS group (P=0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). Among all groups, other short-term postoperative outcomes such as hospital stay and complications did not show significant difference, and oncological survival results were similar.
Conclusion
Better postoperative inflammatory indices in the RS group may correlate with their faster recovery of bowel motility and diet resumption compared to LS and OS groups.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Open, Laparoscopic, and robotic approaches in colorectal surgery: a comprehensive review with focus on colorectal cancer
Farhad Shafiei, Fatemeh Kani, Nargess Porkar, Maede Mirzaee, Fatemeh Heidarzadeh, Mahdi Kolivand, Soheila Behdad, Amir Shokri
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Übergangsphase zur roboterassistierten Chirurgie beim kolorektalen Karzinom: eine vergleichende konsekutive Kohortenstudie
U. A. Dietz, M. Kalisvaart, S. Maksimovic, R. Frey, M. Ramser, B. M. Erhart, U. Pfefferkorn
Die Chirurgie.2025; 96(11): 942. CrossRef
Comparative clinical efficacy of three surgical modalities for the treatment of malignant tumours of the left hemicolon
Hao Chen, Dong-Ping Han, Jian-Yang Xiong, Zhen-Sheng Li, Teng-Cheng Hu, Zheng-Rong Li, Yi Cao
World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of the perioperative outcomes of robotic vs. open distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis of propensity-score-matched studies
Junjie Wang, Yuanjun Liu, Yakun Wu
Frontiers in Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Effectiveness of Guardix-SG in Preventing Postoperative Bowel Complications After Radical Cystectomy: A Single-Arm Prospective Observational Study
Jiwoong Yu, Wan Song, Minyong Kang, Hyun Hwan Sung, Hwang Gyun Jeon, Seong Il Seo, Seong Soo Jeon, Byong Chang Jeong
Journal of Urologic Oncology.2025; 23(3): 253. CrossRef
Laparoscopic surgery should be a viable option for T4 colon cancer: evidence from a propensity score matching analysis
Xiaomei Jiang, Hang Zhou, Zhaoyang Zheng, Xiaodong Wang, Zongguang Zhou, Lie Yang
Updates in Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef

Videos

Minimally invasive surgery

Robotic abdominoperineal resection, bilateral robotic groin node dissection and simultaneous perineal gracilis flap reconstruction for locally advanced node-positive anal squamous cell carcinoma: Mohammed Ali, Melanie Holzgang, Vivekanandan Kumar, Dhalia Masud, Sandeep Kapur, Ahmed El-Hadi, Dolly Dowsett, Irshad Shaikh; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(6):613-615. Published online December 2, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00801.0114

2,624 View
72 Download

PDF Supplementary Material

Video clip

Robotic total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis: Jonathan Yu Jin Chua, Nan Zun Teo, James Chi-Yong Ngu; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(2):186-187. Published online April 22, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00066.0009

5,561 View
157 Download
2 Web of Science
1 Citations

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

The benefits of minimally invasive approaches in colorectal surgery have been well demonstrated. However, some hesitancy remains with regards to the utilization of the robotic platform for total colectomies, mostly due to the perceived need for multiple re-dockings in multiquadrant surgery. This video aims to demonstrate how the robotic platform can be efficiently utilized in multiquadrant surgery without the need for multiple re-dockings, as well as some tips on how to overcome the potential challenges that may be encountered during this procedure.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Fully Robotic Total Colectomy in High‐Risk Patients and Review of Literature
Igor Monsellato, Teresa Gatto, Maria Antonietta Alagia, Federico Sangiuolo, Marco Palucci, Celeste del Basso, Martina Girardi, Irene Gandini, Gabriela Del Angel‐Millan, Marco Lodin, Fabio Giannone, Gianluca Cassese, Fabrizio Panaro
The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef

Tips and tricks for robotic lateral pelvic node dissection: James Chi-Yong Ngu, Nan-Zun Teo; Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(6):531-531. Published online December 26, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00766.0109

4,149 View
149 Download

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material: Lateral pelvic node dissection can be challenging. In addition to detailed anatomical knowledge of the pelvic side wall, surgeons also need to be proficient in performing fine dissection within the confines of this limited operative field. While the incorporation of robotics can facilitate the safe completion of this technically demanding procedure, this is nonetheless dependent on the way the robotic system is used. This video aims to demonstrate several tips and tricks for performing robotic lateral pelvic node dissection.

Technical Note

Minimally invasive surgery

Robotic natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) for anterior resection: Toan Duc Pham, Tomas Larach, Bushra Othman, Amrish Rajkomar, Alexander G. Heriot, Satish K. Warrier, Philip Smart; Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(6):526-530. Published online December 19, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00458.0065

7,843 View
124 Download
4 Web of Science
4 Citations

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Minimally invasive colorectal surgery is currently well-accepted, with open techniques being reserved for very difficult cases. Laparoscopic colectomy has been proven to have lower mortality, complication, and ostomy rates; a shorter median length of stay; and lower overall costs when compared to its open counterpart. This trend is seen in both benign and malignant indications. Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) in colorectal surgery was first described in the early 1990s. Three recent meta-analyses comparing transabdominal extraction against NOSES concluded that NOSES was superior in terms of overall postoperative complications, recovery of gastrointestinal function, postoperative pain, aesthetics, and hospital stay. However, NOSES was associated with a longer operative time. Herein, we present our technique of robotic NOSES anterior resection using the da Vinci Xi platform in diverticular disease and sigmoid colon cancers.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Laparoscopic natural orifice specimen extraction for diverticular disease: a systematic review
Jasmine Mui, Mina Sarofim, Ernest Cheng, Andrew Gilmore
Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(5): 3049. CrossRef
Current Application Status and Innovative Development of Surgical Robot
Aimin Jiang, Zhao Tang, Hanzhong Zhang, Jinxin Li, Jialin Meng, Ying Liu, Yu Fang, Juan Lu, Xu Zhang, Le Qu, Anqi Lin, Linhui Wang
Med Research.2025; 1(3): 378. CrossRef
Precision and Power: A Comprehensive Review of Exploring the Role of Laser Treatment in Hemorrhoidal Management
Dheeraj Surya, Pankaj Gharde
Cureus.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Beyond survival: a comprehensive review of quality of life in rectal cancer patients
Won Beom Jung
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 527. CrossRef

Case Report

Colorectal cancer

Treatment of side limb full-thickness prolapse of the side-to-end coloanal anastomosis following intersphincteric resection: a case report and review of literature: Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Krunal Khobragade, Seon Hui Shin, Jeong Min Choo, Seon Hahn Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(Suppl 1):S38-S43. Published online February 8, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00829.0118

4,071 View
108 Download
1 Citations

Abstract PDF

Intersphincteric resection (ISR) with coloanal anastomosis is an oncologically safe anus-preserving technique for very low-lying rectal cancers. Most studies focused on oncological and functional outcomes of ISR with very few evaluating long-term postoperative anorectal complications. Full-thickness prolapse of the neorectum is a relatively rare complication. This report presents the case of a 70-year-old woman presenting with full-thickness prolapse of the side limb of the side-to-end coloanal anastomosis occurring 2 weeks after the stoma closure and 2 months after a robotic partial ISR performed with the Da Vinci single-port platform. The anastomosis was revised through resection of the side limb and conversion of the side-to-end anastomosis into an end-to-end handsewn anastomosis with interrupted stitches. This study describes the first case of full-thickness prolapse of the side limb of the side-to-end handsewn coloanal anastomosis following ISR. Moreover, a revision of all reported cases of post-ISR full-thickness and mucosal prolapse was performed.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

International standardization and optimization group for intersphincteric resection (ISOG‐ISR): modified Delphi consensus on anatomy, definition, indication, surgical technique, specimen description and functional outcome
Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Krunal Khobragade, Vusal Aliyev, Oktar Asoglu, Paolo Pietro Bianchi, Vlad‐Olimpiu Butiurca, William Tzu‐Liang Chen, Ju Yong Cheong, Gyu‐Seog Choi, Andrea Coratti, Quentin Denost, Yosuke Fukunaga, Emre Gorgun, Francesco Guerra, Ma
Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(9): 1896. CrossRef

Original Articles

Minimally invasive surgery

A comparative study of the pathological outcomes of robot-assisted versus open surgery for rectal cancer: René Reyes, Csaba Kindler, Kenneth Smedh, Catarina Tiselius; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(2):154-160. Published online December 28, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00332.0047

4,715 View
143 Download
2 Web of Science
3 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
The use of robot-assisted surgery for rectal cancer is increasing, but the pathological outcomes have not been fully clarified. We compared the surgical and pathological outcomes between robot-assisted and open surgery in specimens from patients operated on for rectal cancer.
Methods
All patients who underwent resection for rectal cancer from 2016 to 2018 were included (n=137). Specimens were divided into 3 sections to analyze the pathology of the lymph nodes.
Results
The total specimen lengths were shorter in the robot-assisted group than in the open surgery group (mean±standard deviation: 29.1±8.6 cm vs. 33.8±9.9 cm, P=0.004) because of a shorter proximal resection margin (21.7±8.7 cm vs. 26.4±10.6 cm, P=0.006). The number of recruited lymph nodes (35.8±21.8 vs. 39.6±16.5, P=0.604) and arterial vessel length (8.84±2.6 cm vs. 8.78±2.4 cm, P=0.891) did not differ significantly between the 2 surgical approaches. Lymph node metastases were found in 33 of 137 samples (24.1%), but the numbers did not differ significantly between the procedures. Among these 33 cases, metastatic lymph nodes were located in the mesorectum (75.8%), in the sigmoid colon mesentery (33.3%), and at the arterial ligation site of the inferior mesenteric artery (12.1%). The circumferential resection margin and the proportion of complete mesorectal fascia were comparable between the groups.
Conclusion
There were no significant differences between the 2 surgical approaches regarding arterial vessel length, recruitment of lymph node metastases, and resection margins.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer Treatment: Clinical Outcomes and Quality of Life. Comparison of Surgical Methods
Raminta Akelaitytė, Justas Žilinskas
Lietuvos chirurgija.2025; 24(3): 184. CrossRef
Can robotic surgery lead the way in the treatment of rectal cancer?
Jeonghee Han
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(2): 87. CrossRef
Comparative analysis of short-term outcomes and oncological results between robotic-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer by multiple surgeon implementation: a propensity score-matched analysis
E. Barzola, L. Cornejo, N. Gómez, A. Pigem, D. Julià, N. Ortega, O. Delisau, K. A. Bobb, R. Farrés, P. Planellas
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2023; 17(6): 3013. CrossRef

Minimally invasive surgery

Learning curve for single-port robot-assisted colectomy: Moon Suk Choi, Seong Hyeon Yun, Sung Chul Lee, Jung Kyong Shin, Yoon Ah Park, Jungwook Huh, Yong Beom Cho, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(1):44-51. Published online December 20, 2022; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00745.0106

6,687 View
258 Download
8 Web of Science
8 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
Since the introduction of robotic surgery, robots for colorectal cancer have replaced laparoscopic surgery, and a single-port robot (SPR) platform has been launched and is being used to treat patients. We analyzed the learning curve and initial complications of using an SPR platform in colorectal cancer surgery.
Methods
We reviewed 39 patients who underwent SPR colectomy from April to October 2019. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon using an SPR device. A learning curve was generated using the cumulative sum methodology to assess changes in total operation time, docking time, and surgeon console time. We grouped the patients into 3 groups according to the time period: the first 11 were phase 1, the next 11 were phase 2, and the last 17 were phase 3.
Results
The mean age of the patients was 61.28±13.03 years, and they had a mean body mass index of 23.79±2.86 kg/m2. Among the patients, 23 (59.0%) were male, and 16 (41.0%) were female. The average operation time was 186.59±51.30 minutes, the average surgeon console time was 95.49±35.33 minutes, and the average docking time (time from skin incision to robot docking) was 14.87±10.38 minutes. The surgeon console time differed significantly among the different phases (P<0.001). Complications occurred in 8 patients: 2 ileus, 2 postoperation hemoglobin changes, 3 urinary retentions, and 1 complicated fluid collection.
Conclusion
In our experience, the learning curve for SPR colectomy was achieved after the 18th case.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Clinical applications of the da Vinci Single-Port robotic system for treatment of colorectal cancer: a narrative review
Gyu-Seog Choi, Hye Jin Kim
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2026; 110(1): 35. CrossRef
A systematic review of the Da Vinci® Single-Port system (DVSP) in the context of colorectal surgery
Francesco Brucchi, Isacco Montroni, Roberto Cirocchi, Giovanni Taffurelli, Marco Vitellaro, Gianluca Mascianà, Giovanni Battista Levi Sandri, Gianlorenzo Dionigi, Sara Lauricella
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Assessing the learning curve in robot-assisted intracorporeal colorectal anastomosis and transrectal extraction (NICE) procedure: from Initial Learning to Mastery
Jacques Bistre-Varon, Muhammed Elhadi, Robert Wei, Jimena Alcocer-Barrios, Ryan Gunter, Joshua Coursey, Priya Prakash, Erin McAtee, Haley Lanser, Rachel Ellsworth, Matthew Weaver, Jean-Paul LeFave, Eric M. Haas
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Short-term outcomes of single-port robotic surgery versus single-port laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer: a multicenter matched-cohort analysis
Gyoung Tae Noh, Young Il Kim, Seung Ho Song, Hye Jin Kim, Song-Soo Yang, Yong Sik Yoon, Ji Hoon Kim, Hyung Jin Kim, Byung Mo Kang, Chang Woo Kim, Suk-Hwan Lee, Jun Gi Kim, Yoon Suk Lee
Surgical Endoscopy.2025; 39(12): 8444. CrossRef
Application of the Da Vinci Single‐Port (SP) Robot in General Surgery: A First Systematic Review
Antonio Cubisino, Maurice Chazal, Fabrizio Panaro
The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Da Vinci single-port robotic system current application and future perspective in general surgery: A scoping review
Francesco Celotto, Niccolò Ramacciotti, Alberto Mangano, Giacomo Danieli, Federico Pinto, Paula Lopez, Alvaro Ducas, Jessica Cassiani, Luca Morelli, Gaya Spolverato, Francesco Maria Bianco
Surgical Endoscopy.2024; 38(9): 4814. CrossRef
Wristed articulated instrumentation for single‐incision plus one‐port laparoscopic surgery for obstructed sigmoid colon cancer—A video vignette
Sung Uk Bae
Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(9): 1782. CrossRef
Evaluation of the da Vinci single-port system in colorectal cancer surgery: a scoping review
Arcangelo Picciariello, Alfredo Annicchiarico, Gaetano Gallo, Agnese Dezi, Ugo Grossi
Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(7): 2515. CrossRef

Review

Malignant disease, Rectal cancer ,Functional outcomes,Colorectal cancer,Minimally invasive surgery

Robotic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Technical Controversies and a Systematic Review on the Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes: Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Seon Hahn Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(6):351-367. Published online November 17, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00836.0119

10,624 View
217 Download
47 Web of Science
48 Citations

Abstract PDF

Intersphincteric resection (ISR) is the ultimate anus-sparing technique for low rectal cancer and is considered an oncologically safe alternative to abdominoperineal resection. The application of the robotic approach to ISR (RISR) has been described by few specialized surgical teams with several differences regarding approach and technique. This review aims to discuss the technical aspects of RISR by evaluating point by point each surgical controversy. Moreover, a systematic review was performed to report the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes of RISR. Postoperative morbidities after RISR are acceptable. RISR allows adequate surgical margins and adequate oncological outcomes. RISR may result in severe bowel and genitourinary dysfunction affecting the quality of life in a portion of patients.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Rectal Eversion as an Anus-sparing Technique in Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection With Double Stapling Anastomosis: Long-term Functional Results
Servet Karagul, Serdar Senol, Oktay Karakose, Huseyin Eken, Cuneyt Kayaalp
Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a comparative study on surgical safety and functional outcomes
Li TengTeng, Fu HaiXiao, Fu Wei, Zhang Xuan
ANZ Journal of Surgery.2025; 95(1-2): 156. CrossRef
The Review of Modified Intersphincteric Resection in the Treatment of Ultra-Low Rectal Cancer
Danni Li, Xi Xiong, Pan Diao, Jitao Hu, Wenbo Niu, Guiying Wang, Baokun Li
Current Treatment Options in Oncology.2025; 26(2): 84. CrossRef
Long-term functional and prognostic outcomes of robotic intersphincteric resection for treating low rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective study
Yang Bo, Wang Yigao, Zheng Mingye, Jian Zhao, Yongxiang Li
International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparison of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted sugery for rectal cancer after neo-adjuvant therapy: a large volume single center experience
Heyuan Zhu, Jingyu Zou, Hongfeng Pan, Ying Huang, Pan Chi
BMC Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Construction of a risk factor prediction model for postoperative complications in elderly patients with colorectal cancer using machine learning
Changzhong Fang, Wenbin Shi, Yu Qiao, Shuwen Deng, Gen Liang, Binbin Huang, Wenjuan Gao, Jiming Lian, Nanhui Yu
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic Beyond Total Mesorectal Excision (bTME) for locally advanced and recurrent anorectal cancer: a systematic review
Joachim Cheng En Ho, Aryan Raj Goel, Muriel Sirgi, Ayan Bin Rafaih, Ayaz Ahmed Memon, Irshad Shaikh, Muhammad Rafaih Iqbal
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic rectal cancer surgery in a medium-volume center: Oncologic and functional outcomes of an 8-year experience
Teresa Gatto, Igor Monsellato, Marco Palucci, Federico Sangiuolo, Mariantonietta Alagia, Celeste Del Basso, Fabio Giannone, Gianluca Cassese, Fabrizio Panaro
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Learning curve for Da Vinci single–port robotic rectal cancer surgery
Yong Ki Jeong, Mohammed Ahmed Almalik, In Kyeong Kim, Jung Hoon Bae, In Kyu Lee, Hyeon-Min Cho, Yoon Suk Lee
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparing the Surgical Outcomes of Intersphincteric Resection (ISR) and Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision (TATME) in Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
Mohsin Farid Sulehri, Mengchuan Wang, Wulikaixi Yagufu, Zhengqi Peng, Yiteng Chen
Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The prognostic value of preoperative Neutrophil-to-Albumin ratio (NPAR) for postoperative complications and survival in colorectal cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted surgery: a retrospective cohort study
Jing Wang, Fang Chen, Tao Hu, Nanhui Yu
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic Anterior Resection for Rectosigmoid Colon Cancer Using Single-Port Access
Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2024; 67(1): e1. CrossRef
Robotic surgery for bowel endometriosis: a multidisciplinary management of a complex entity
G. N. Piozzi, V. Burea, R. Duhoky, S. Stefan, C. So, D. Wilby, D. Tsepov, J. S. Khan
Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Sex Disparities in Rectal Cancer Surgery: An In-Depth Analysis of Surgical Approaches and Outcomes
Chungyeop Lee, In Ja Park
The World Journal of Men's Health.2024; 42(2): 304. CrossRef
Robotic beyond total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancers: Perioperative and oncological outcomes from a multicentre case series
Jim S. Khan, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Philippe Rouanet, Avanish Saklani, Volkan Ozben, Paul Neary, Peter Coyne, Seon Hahn Kim, Julio Garcia-Aguilar
European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024; 50(6): 108308. CrossRef
Treatment of side limb full-thickness prolapse of the side-to-end coloanal anastomosis following intersphincteric resection: a case report and review of literature
Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Krunal Khobragade, Seon Hui Shin, Jeong Min Choo, Seon Hahn Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(Suppl 1): S38. CrossRef
Robotic approach to colonic resection: For some or for all patients?
Sentilnathan Subramaniam, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Seon‐Hahn Kim, Jim S. Khan
Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(7): 1447. CrossRef
The role of robotic-assisted surgery in the management of rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Chenxiong Zhang, Hao Tan, Han Xu, Jiaming Ding
International Journal of Surgery.2024; 110(10): 6282. CrossRef
The Impact of a Modular Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision Training Program on Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes in Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery
Samuel Stefan, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Patricia Tejedor, Christopher C.L. Liao, Anwar Ahmad, Nasir Z. Ahmad, Syed A.H. Naqvi, Richard J. Heald, Jim S. Khan
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2024; 67(11): 1485. CrossRef
Suitable T stage for cryosurgery to spare the anus in patients with low rectal cancer
Xuejun Jiang, Zujin Ji, Xinyi Lei, Cui Liu, Fangjun Yuan
Cryobiology.2023; 111: 121. CrossRef
Morbidity and oncological outcomes after intersphincteric resection of the rectum for low-lying rectal cancer: experience of a single center in a lower-middle-income country
Antoinette Afua Asiedua Bediako-Bowan, Narious Naalane, Jonathan C. B. Dakubo
BMC Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic male and laparoscopic female sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer share similar specimen quality, complication rates and long-term oncological outcomes
Vusal Aliyev, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Elnur Huseynov, Teuta Zoto Mustafayev, Vildan Kayku, Suha Goksel, Oktar Asoglu
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2023; 17(4): 1637. CrossRef
International standardization and optimization group for intersphincteric resection (ISOG‐ISR): modified Delphi consensus on anatomy, definition, indication, surgical technique, specimen description and functional outcome
Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Krunal Khobragade, Vusal Aliyev, Oktar Asoglu, Paolo Pietro Bianchi, Vlad‐Olimpiu Butiurca, William Tzu‐Liang Chen, Ju Yong Cheong, Gyu‐Seog Choi, Andrea Coratti, Quentin Denost, Yosuke Fukunaga, Emre Gorgun, Francesco Guerra, Ma
Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(9): 1896. CrossRef
International Society of University Colon and Rectal Surgeons survey of surgeons’ preference on rectal cancer treatment
Audrius Dulskas, Philip F. Caushaj, Domas Grigoravicius, Liu Zheng, Richard Fortunato, Joseph W. Nunoo-Mensah, Narimantas E. Samalavicius
Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(4): 307. CrossRef
Short-term outcomes of da Vinci SP versus Xi for colon cancer surgery: a propensity-score matching analysis of multicenter cohorts
Jin-Min Jung, Young Il Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Songsoo Yang, Min Hyun Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2023; 17(6): 2911. CrossRef
Low anterior resection syndrome: is it predictable?
Dong Hyun Kang
Annals of Coloproctology.2023; 39(5): 373. CrossRef
Fluorescence-guided colorectal surgery: applications, clinical results, and protocols
Jin-Min Jung, In Ja Park, Eun Jung Park, Gyung Mo Son
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(5): 252. CrossRef
Robotic and laparoscopic sphincter-saving resections have similar peri-operative, oncological and functional outcomes in female patients with rectal cancer
Vusal Aliyev, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Niyaz Shadmanov, Koray Guven, Barıs Bakır, Suha Goksel, Oktar Asoglu
Updates in Surgery.2023; 75(8): 2201. CrossRef
Development of robotic surgical devices and its application in colorectal surgery
Kamil Erozkan, Emre Gorgun
Mini-invasive Surgery.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341. CrossRef
Preventing Anastomotic Leakage, a Devastating Complication of Colorectal Surgery
Hyun Gu Lee
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Surgical Techniques for Transanal Local Excision for Early Rectal Cancer
Gyoung Tae Noh
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer
In Ja Park
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Advances in the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer with Peritoneal Metastases: A Focus on Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
Youngbae Jeon, Eun Jung Park
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
How Can We Improve the Tumor Response to Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer?
Jeonghee Han
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Clinical Implication of Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
In Ja Park
The Ewha Medical Journal.2022; 45(1): 3. CrossRef
Current status of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer: A review
Won Beom Jung
International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention.2022; 11(2): 56. CrossRef
Current status and role of robotic approach in patients with low-lying rectal cancer
Hyo Seon Ryu, Jin Kim
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2022; 103(1): 1. CrossRef
Robotic vs. laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a case matched study reporting a median of 7-year long-term oncological and functional outcomes
Vusal Aliyev, Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Alisina Bulut, Koray Guven, Baris Bakir, Sezer Saglam, Suha Goksel, Oktar Asoglu
Updates in Surgery.2022; 74(6): 1851. CrossRef
Efficacy of intraoperative fluorescence imaging using indocyanine green‐containing gauze in identifying the appropriate dissection layer in laparoscopic intersphincteric resection: A case report
Hiroyuki Kumata, Keisuke Onishi, Tetsuro Takayama, Kengo Asami, Noriyuki Obara, Hirofumi Sugawara, Izumi Haga
Clinical Case Reports.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer
Sung Uk Bae
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 577. CrossRef
Direction of diagnosis and treatment improvement in colorectal cancer
In Ja Park
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 540. CrossRef
Current Status and Future of Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer-An English Version
Sung Uk Bae
Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2022; 6(4): 221. CrossRef
Update on Diagnosis and Treatment of Colorectal Cancer
Chan Wook Kim
The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, and Current Management
Seung Mi Yeo, Gyung Mo Son
The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Is It a Refractory Disease?- Fecal Incontinence; beyond Medication
Chungyeop Lee, Jong Lyul Lee
The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Robot-Assisted Colorectal Surgery
Young Il Kim
The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
It Is a Pleasure to Announce the Issue Titled “Master Class 2021” in Annals of Coloproctology
In Ja Park
Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 349. CrossRef

Technical Note

Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Minimally invasive surgery

Single-port robot-assisted abdominoperineal resection: a case review of the first four experiences: Moon Suk Choi, Seong Hyeon Yun, Jung Kyong Shin, Yoon Ah Park, Jung Wook Huh, Yong Beom Cho, Hee Cheol Kim, Woo Yong Lee; Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(1):88-92. Published online October 18, 2021; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2021.00395.0056

5,803 View
137 Download
7 Web of Science
7 Citations

Abstract PDF

Recently, abdominoperineal resection (APR) using a robot has been demonstrated in other studies. However, there has been no report on APR for rectal cancer using the single-port robot (SPR) platform. In response to this research gap, we described the clinical experience of APR using a SPR. From April 2019 to March 2020, APR using a SPR platform was performed in a total of 4 patients. Three patients had a transumbilical approach, and 1 patient had a transstoma site approach. The average operation time was 307 minutes, and the patient docking time to the SPR platform was 133.5 minutes. There were no complications during the operation, and no laparoscopy or open conversion. No reoperation occurred within 30 days. Mild postoperative complications occurred in 2 patients. We found that APR has safety and feasibility in surgery using an SPR platform. There was no intraoperative event and severe postoperative complications.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Application of the Da Vinci Single‐Port (SP) Robot in General Surgery: A First Systematic Review
Antonio Cubisino, Maurice Chazal, Fabrizio Panaro
The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Single-incision laparoscopic total extraperitoneal inguinal-hernia repair using the new articulating instruments: A video vignette
Chul Seung Lee, Gwan Chul Lee, Choon Sik Chung, Dong Keun Lee
Asian Journal of Surgery.2024; 47(8): 3586. CrossRef
Evaluation of the da Vinci single-port system in colorectal cancer surgery: a scoping review
Arcangelo Picciariello, Alfredo Annicchiarico, Gaetano Gallo, Agnese Dezi, Ugo Grossi
Updates in Surgery.2024; 76(7): 2515. CrossRef
Single-incision robotic colorectal surgery with the da Vinci SP® surgical system: initial results of 50 cases
H. S. Kim, B.-Y. Oh, C. Cheong, M. H. Park, S. S. Chung, R.-A. Lee, K. H. Kim, G. T. Noh
Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(7): 589. CrossRef
Short-term outcomes of single-incision robotic colectomy versus conventional multiport laparoscopic colectomy for colon cancer
Ho Seung Kim, Bo-Young Oh, Soon Sup Chung, Ryung-Ah Lee, Gyoung Tae Noh
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2023; 17(5): 2351. CrossRef
Short-term outcomes of da Vinci SP versus Xi for colon cancer surgery: a propensity-score matching analysis of multicenter cohorts
Jin-Min Jung, Young Il Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Songsoo Yang, Min Hyun Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2023; 17(6): 2911. CrossRef
Surgical Techniques for Transanal Local Excision for Early Rectal Cancer
Gyoung Tae Noh
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef

Review

Malignant disease, Rectal cancer

Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: Current Evidences and Future Perspectives: Je-Ho Jang, Chang-Nam Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2020;36(5):293-303. Published online October 31, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.06.16

7,752 View
114 Download
17 Web of Science
19 Citations

Abstract PDF

Despite the technical limitations of minimally invasive surgery, laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (LTME) for rectal cancer has short-term advantages over open surgery, but the pathological outcomes reported in randomized clinical trials are still in controversy. Minimally invasive robotic total mesorectal excision (RTME) has recently been gaining popularity as robotic surgical systems potentially provide greater benefits than LTME. Compared to LTME, RTME is associated with lower conversion rates and similar or better genitourinary functions, but its long-term oncological outcomes have not been established. Although the operating time of RTME is longer than that of LTME, RTME has a shorter learning curve, is more convenient for surgeons, and is better for sphincter-preserving operations than LTME. The robotic surgical system is a good technical tool for minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer, especially in male patients with narrow deep pelvises. Robotic systems and robotic surgical techniques are still improving, and the contribution of RTME to the treatment of rectal cancer will continue to increase in the future.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Robotic total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: Transluminal illumination of the recto‐vaginal septum, transanal low rectal dissection and handmade low colorectal anastomosis—A video vignette
Francesco Crafa, Serafino Vanella, Alfonso Amendola, Emanuele Caruso
Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparing the perioperative, postoperative, and oncological outcomes between robotic and transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies with a subgroup analysis for overweight p
Konstantinos Kossenas, Riad Kouzeiha, Hamada Hashem, Ali Elshamsy, Filippos Georgopoulos
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Latest advances in the soft tissue robotic market: what you need to know
Gita Lingam, Bekim Arifaj, Taner Shakir, Thurkga Moothathamby, Nader Francis, Kapil Sahnan
Frontline Gastroenterology.2025; : flgastro-2024-103022. CrossRef
The articulated laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer (ATOME trial): a single-arm, prospective trial with pre-specified comparison to robotic surgery
Kyeong Eui Kim, Sung Uk Bae, Seung Hyun Lee, Dae-Ro Lim, Heon-Kyun Ha, Jin Kim, Hyo Seon Ryu, Soo Yeon Park, Sung Il Kang, Gyung Mo Son, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Kyung Ha Lee, Gi Won Ha, Hye Jin Kim, Woong Bae Ji, Woo Ram Kim, Sang Hee Kang, Nak Son
Trials.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Can robotic surgery lead the way in the treatment of rectal cancer?
Jeonghee Han
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(2): 87. CrossRef
Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer With a Wristed Articulated Instrument
Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2023; 66(1): e1. CrossRef
Short-term outcomes of da Vinci SP versus Xi for colon cancer surgery: a propensity-score matching analysis of multicenter cohorts
Jin-Min Jung, Young Il Kim, Yong Sik Yoon, Songsoo Yang, Min Hyun Kim, Jong Lyul Lee, Chan Wook Kim, In Ja Park, Seok-Byung Lim, Chang Sik Yu
Journal of Robotic Surgery.2023; 17(6): 2911. CrossRef
Cirugía del cáncer de recto asistida por robot (X y Xi)
P. Rouanet, M. Lehiany, A. Mourregot, P.-E. Colombo, C. Taoum
EMC - Técnicas Quirúrgicas - Aparato Digestivo.2023; 39(4): 1. CrossRef
Chirurgia del cancro del retto mediante assistenza robotica (X e Xi)
P. Rouanet, M. Lehiany, A. Mourregot, P.-E. Colombo, C. Taoum
EMC - Tecniche Chirurgiche Addominale.2023; 29(4): 1. CrossRef
Chirurgie du cancer du rectum par assistance robotique (X et Xi)
P. Rouanet, M. Lehiany, A. Mourregot, P.-E. Colombo, C. Taoum
EMC - Techniques chirurgicales - Appareil digestif.2023; 40(3): 1. CrossRef
The clinical impact of robot‐assisted laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery associated with robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy
Anri Maeda, Hiroki Takahashi, Kaori Watanabe, Takeshi Yanagita, Takuya Suzuki, Nozomu Nakai, Yuzo Maeda, Kazuyoshi Shiga, Takahisa Hirokawa, Ryo Ogawa, Masayasu Hara, Yoichi Matsuo, Shuji Takiguchi
Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery.2022; 15(1): 36. CrossRef
Clinical Implication of Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy
In Ja Park
The Ewha Medical Journal.2022; 45(1): 3. CrossRef
Multidisciplinary treatment strategy for early rectal cancer
Gyung Mo Son, In Young Lee, Sung Hwan Cho, Byung-Soo Park, Hyun Sung Kim, Su Bum Park, Hyung Wook Kim, Sang Bo Oh, Tae Un Kim, Dong Hoon Shin
Precision and Future Medicine.2022; 6(1): 32. CrossRef
Direction of diagnosis and treatment improvement in colorectal cancer
In Ja Park
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2022; 65(9): 540. CrossRef
Low Anterior Resection Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Risk Factors, and Current Management
Seung Mi Yeo, Gyung Mo Son
The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Robot-Assisted Colorectal Surgery
Young Il Kim
The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Robot-assisted laparoscopic rectal surgery: operative technique and initial experiences
Bianka Hummel, Anna Nagel, Benjamin Süsoy, Linda Tarantik, Linda Michlmayr, Friedrich Längle, Clemens Bittermann
European Surgery.2021; 53(4): 175. CrossRef
Robotic Intersphincteric Resection for Low Rectal Cancer: Technical Controversies and a Systematic Review on the Perioperative, Oncological, and Functional Outcomes
Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Seon Hahn Kim
Annals of Coloproctology.2021; 37(6): 351. CrossRef
Functional outcomes after sphincter-preserving surgeries for low-lying rectal cancer: A review
Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
Precision and Future Medicine.2021; 5(4): 164. CrossRef

Video

Malignant disease, Rectal cancer,Minimally invasive surgery,Surgical technique

Standardized Step-by-step Technique Using Surgical Landmarks in Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: Jung Hoon Bae, Wooree Koh, Hyun Ho Kim, Yoon Suk Lee; Ann Coloproctol. 2021;37(1):58-60. Published online September 18, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.08.05

9,841 View
282 Download
12 Web of Science
13 Citations

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

We aimed to show that a standardized step-by-step robotic approach using surgical landmarks could make lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPND) less complicated. We performed robot-assisted LPND consisting of 4 steps using surgical landmarks. The first step is a dissection of uretero-hypogastric fascia, which envelopes the ureter and the hypogastric nerve. The second step is a dissection of the medial side of the external iliac vein located at the lateral border of the obturator lymph nodes (LNs) group. The third step is a dissection of the vesico-hypogastric fascia, which is at the medial border of the obturator LNs group. The final step is a dissection of the internal iliac artery until the Alcock’s canal. Indocyanine green was injected just before surgery around the dentate line to identify the lateral pelvic LNs. Standardization using a robotic approach for LPND guided by surgical landmarks allows a safer and more effective surgery.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

The first video comparison of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in rectal cancer: Laparoscopic approach using articulating instruments (ArtiSential) versus robotic Xi platform—A video vignette
In Kyeong Kim, Jung Hoon Bae, In Kyu Lee, Yoon Suk Lee
Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
MRI-based scoring systems for selective lateral lymph node dissection in locally advanced low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
Min Jeong Cho, Kyunghwa Han, Hye Jung Shin, Woong Sub Koom, Kang Young Lee, Joo Hee Kim, Joon Seok Lim
European Radiology.2025; 35(8): 4967. CrossRef
Short- and long-term outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic lateral lymph node dissection for rectal cancer
Daichi Kitaguchi, Tsuyoshi Enomoto, Kinji Furuya, Shuntaro Tsukamoto, Tatsuya Oda
Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Is lateral pelvic lymph node dissection necessary for good responder to neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer?
Jung Hoon Bae, Jumyung Song, Ji Hoon Kim, Bong-Hyeon Kye, In Kyu Lee, Hyeon-Min Cho, Yoon Suk Lee
Surgical Oncology.2025; 61: 102249. CrossRef
Was there any change in surgical treatment for colorectal cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic?
Yeajin Moon, Seung Hun Lee, Seung Hyun Lee
Kosin Medical Journal.2025; 40(3): 207. CrossRef
The use of indocyanine green for lateral lymph node dissection in rectal cancer—preliminary data from an emerging procedure: a systematic review of the literature
D. Kehagias, C. Lampropoulos, A. Bellou, I. Kehagias
Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Japanese expert consensus on the standardization of robot‐assisted pelvic lymph node dissection in urological surgery: Extent of pelvic lymph node and surgical technique
Shuichi Morizane, Jun Miki, Masaki Shimbo, Toru Kanno, Noriyoshi Miura, Yuta Yamada, Takeshi Yamasaki, Takashi Saika, Atsushi Takenaka
International Journal of Urology.2024; 31(12): 1300. CrossRef
Simplified approach to the medial internal iliac region using a uretero‐hypogastric nerve fascia development procedure for extended pelvic lymph node dissection during robot‐assisted radical prostatectomy for high‐risk prostate cancer
Masaki Shimbo, Takehiro Ohyama, Fumiyasu Endo, Kenji Komatsu, Yoko Kyono, Masayuki Sano, Kazutaka Narimoto, Kazunori Hattori
International Journal of Urology.2023; 30(2): 190. CrossRef
Lateral Lymph Node Size and Tumor Distance From Anal Verge Accurately Predict Positive Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes in Rectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study
Jung Hoon Bae, Jumyung Song, Ji Hoon Kim, Bong-Hyeon Kye, In Kyu Lee, Hyeon-Min Cho, Yoon Suk Lee
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2023; 66(6): 785. CrossRef
Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection Could Harvest More Lateral Pelvic Lymph Nodes over Laparoscopic Approach for Mid-to-Low Rectal Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Cohort Study
Jung Hoon Bae, Jumyung Song, Ri Na Yoo, Ji Hoon Kim, Bong-Hyeon Kye, In Kyu Lee, Hyeon-Min Cho, Yoon Suk Lee
Biomedicines.2023; 11(6): 1556. CrossRef
Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Colorectal Cancer
In Ja Park
The Ewha Medical Journal.2023;[Epub] CrossRef
Robot-Assisted Colorectal Surgery
Young Il Kim
The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef
Enhanced recovery after surgery: importance of compliance audits
Jung Hoon Bae
Journal of the Korean Medical Association.2021; 64(12): 820. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search