Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology

OPEN ACCESS
SEARCH
Search

Search

Page Path
HOME > Search
3 "Robotics"
Filter
Filter
Article category
Keywords
Publication year
Authors
Review
Minimally invasive surgery
Robotic colorectal surgery training: Portsmouth perspective
Guglielmo Niccolò Piozzi, Sentilnathan Subramaniam, Diana Ronconi Di Giuseppe, Rauand Duhoky, Jim S. Khan
Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):350-362.   Published online August 30, 2024
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00444.0063
  • 3,447 View
  • 102 Download
  • 2 Web of Science
  • 2 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
This study aims to discuss the principles and pillars of robotic colorectal surgery training and share the training pathway at Portsmouth Hospitals University NHS Trust. A narrative review is presented to discuss all the relevant and critical steps in robotic surgical training. Robotic training requires a stepwise approach, including theoretical knowledge, case observation, simulation, dry lab, wet lab, tutored programs, proctoring (in person or telementoring), procedure-specific training, and follow-up. Portsmouth Colorectal has an established robotic training model with a safe stepwise approach that has been demonstrated through perioperative and oncological results. Robotic surgery training should enable a trainee to use the robotic platform safely and effectively, minimize errors, and enhance performance with improved outcomes. Portsmouth Colorectal has provided such a stepwise training program since 2015 and continues to promote and augment safe robotic training in its field. Safe and efficient training programs are essential to upholding the optimal standard of care.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in colorectal cancer management: a narrative review of clinical efficacy and multidisciplinary integration
    Engeng Chen, Li Chen, Wei Zhang
    Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • From the Editor: Uniting expertise, a new era of global collaboration in coloproctology
    In Ja Park
    Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 285.     CrossRef
Original Article
Comparison of Short-term Surgical Outcomes between a Robotic Colectomy and a Laparoscopic Colectomy during Early Experience
Jin Yong Shin
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2012;28(1):19-26.   Published online February 29, 2012
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2012.28.1.19
  • 5,396 View
  • 55 Download
  • 43 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF
Purpose

Although robotic surgery was invented to overcome the technical limitations of laparoscopic surgery, the role of a robotic (procto)colectomy (RC) for the treatment of colorectal cancer compared to that of a laparoscopic (procto)colectomy (LC) was not well defined during the initial adoption periods of both procedures. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and the safety of a RC for the treatment of colorectal cancer by comparing the authors' initial experiences with both a RC and a LC.

Methods

The first 30 patients treated by using a RC for colorectal cancer from July 2010 to March 2011 were compared with the first 30 patients treated by using a LC for colorectal cancer from December 2006 to June 2007 by the same surgeon. Perioperative variables and short-term outcomes were analyzed. In addition, the 30 RC and the 30 LC cases involved were divided into rectal cancer (n = 17 and n = 12, respectively), left-sided colon cancer (n = 7 and n = 12, respectively) and right-sided colon cancer (n = 6 and n = 6, respectively) for subgroup analyses.

Results

The mean operating times for RC and LC were significantly different at 371.8 and 275.5 minutes, respectively, but other perioperative parameters (rates of open conversion, numbers of retrieved lymph node, estimated blood losses, times to first flatus, maximal pain scores before discharge and postoperative hospital stays) were not significantly different in the two groups. Subgroup analyses showed that the mean operative times for a robotic proctectomy and a laparoscopic proctectomy were 396.5 and 298.8 minutes, respectively (P < 0.000). Postoperative complications occurred in five patients in the RC group and in six patients in the LC group (P = 0.739).

Conclusion

Although the short-term outcomes of a RC during its initial use were better than those of a LC (with the exception of operating time), differences were not found to be significantly different. On the other hand, the longer operation time of a robotic proctectomy compared to that of a laparoscopic proctectomy during the early period may be problematic.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • Comparison of Operative Time Between Robotic and Laparoscopic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer:A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Zhen Chen, Hua Yu, Huaping Wu, Pingxi Wang, Fanwei Zeng
    Surgical Innovation.2023; 30(3): 390.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of robotic right colectomy and laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jianchun Zheng, Shuai Zhao, Wei Chen, Ming Zhang, Jianxiang Wu
    Techniques in Coloproctology.2023; 27(7): 521.     CrossRef
  • Robotic versus laparoscopic left colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Leonardo Solaini, Antonio Bocchino, Andrea Avanzolini, Domenico Annunziata, Davide Cavaliere, Giorgio Ercolani
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2022; 37(7): 1497.     CrossRef
  • The Senhance Surgical System in Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Tyler McKechnie, Jigish Khamar, Ryan Daniel, Yung Lee, Lily Park, Aristithes G. Doumouras, Dennis Hong, Mohit Bhandari, Cagla Eskicioglu
    Journal of Robotic Surgery.2022; 17(2): 325.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Colectomies Using the 2019 ACS NSQIP Database
    Sara S. Soliman, Joseph Flanagan, Yun Hsiang Wang, Patricia B. Stopper, Rolando H. Rolandelli, Zoltan H. Nemeth
    Southern Medical Journal.2022; 115(12): 887.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic versus robotic right colectomy with extra-corporeal or intra-corporeal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Pietro Genova, Gianni Pantuso, Calogero Cipolla, Mario Adelfio Latteri, Solafah Abdalla, Jean-Christophe Paquet, Francesco Brunetti, Nicola de’Angelis, Salomone Di Saverio
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2021; 406(5): 1317.     CrossRef
  • Urological and sexual function after robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review, meta‐analysis and meta‐regression
    Ian Jun Yan Wee, Li‐Jen Kuo, James Chi‐Yong Ngu
    The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2021; 17(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of clinical efficacy of robotic right colectomy and laparoscopic right colectomy for right colon tumor
    Quan Li Zhu, Xin Xu, Zhi Jian Pan
    Medicine.2021; 100(33): e27002.     CrossRef
  • Safety with Innovation in Colon and Rectal Robotic Surgery
    Deborah S. Keller, Christina N. Jenkins
    Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2021; 34(05): 273.     CrossRef
  • Robotic and robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis of short-term and long-term results
    Guojun Tong, Guiyang Zhang, Zhaozheng Zheng
    Asian Journal of Surgery.2021;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients in terms of recovery time: a monocentric experience
    Giuseppe Palomba, Vincenza Paola Dinuzzi, Marianna Capuano, Pietro Anoldo, Marco Milone, Giovanni Domenico De Palma, Giovanni Aprea
    Journal of Robotic Surgery.2021; 16(4): 981.     CrossRef
  • Robotic surgery for colorectal disease: review of current port placement and future perspectives
    Jong Lyul Lee, Hassan A. Alsaleem, Jin Cheon Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2020; 98(1): 31.     CrossRef
  • The “Micro Hand S” Robot-Assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Right Colectomy: Short-Term Outcomes at a Single Center
    Yijia Zeng, Guohui Wang, Yong Liu, Zheng Li, Bo Yi, Shaihong Zhu
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2020; 30(4): 363.     CrossRef
  • Robotic right colonic resection. Is the robotic third arm a game-changer?
    Alberto Mangano, Federico Gheza, Roberto Bustos, Mario Masrur, Francesco Bianco, Eduardo Fernandes, Valentina Valle, Pier C. Giulianotti
    Minerva Chirurgica.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic Right Colectomy for Colon Cancer; Two Case Reports
    Ryosuke Fukuyo, Hironobu Baba, Takatoshi Matsuyama, Akifumi Kikuchi, Shinichi Yamauchi, Ayumi Takaoka, Yuriko Matsumiya, Yudai Yamamoto, Masanori Tokunaga, Yusuke Kinugasa
    The Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery.2020; 53(2): 164.     CrossRef
  • Impact of ASA-score, age and learning curve on early outcome in the initiation phase of an oncological robotic colorectal program
    Hülya Sarikaya, Tahar Benhidjeb, Sergiu I. Iosivan, Theodoros Kolokotronis, Christine Förster, Stephan Eckert, Ludwig Wilkens, Alaa Nasser, Sebastian Rehberg, Martin Krüger, Jan Schulte am Esch
    Scientific Reports.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic or laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer - which is the best answer? a comprehensive review of non-oncological outcomes and learning curve
    Sandra L. Kavalukas, Amandeep Ghuman, Stephen P. Sharp, Steven D. Wexner
    Mini-invasive Surgery.2020;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Right hemicolectomy: a network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic-assisted, total laparoscopic, and robotic approach
    Emanuele Rausa, Michael Eamon Kelly, Emanuele Asti, Alberto Aiolfi, Gianluca Bonitta, Luigi Bonavina
    Surgical Endoscopy.2019; 33(4): 1020.     CrossRef
  • Long-term oncologic after robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a prospective randomized study
    Jun Seok Park, Hyun Kang, Soo Yeun Park, Hye Jin Kim, In Teak Woo, In-Kyu Park, Gyu-Seog Choi
    Surgical Endoscopy.2019; 33(9): 2975.     CrossRef
  • Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis with Trial Sequential Analysis
    Ka Ting Ng, Azlan Kok Vui Tsia, Vanessa Yu Ling Chong
    World Journal of Surgery.2019; 43(4): 1146.     CrossRef
  • A standardized suprapubic bottom-to-up approach in robotic right colectomy: technical and oncological advances for complete mesocolic excision (CME)
    Jan Schulte am Esch, Sergio-I. Iosivan, Fabian Steinfurth, Ammar Mahdi, Christine Förster, Ludwig Wilkens, Alaa Nasser, Hülya Sarikaya, Tahar Benhidjeb, Martin Krüger
    BMC Surgery.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
    Leonardo Solaini, Francesca Bazzocchi, Davide Cavaliere, Andrea Avanzolini, Alessandro Cucchetti, Giorgio Ercolani
    Surgical Endoscopy.2018; 32(3): 1104.     CrossRef
  • Short-Term Outcomes with Robotic Right Colectomy
    Scott R. Kelley, Emilie Duchalais, David W. Larson
    The American Surgeon™.2018; 84(11): 1768.     CrossRef
  • Robot-Assisted Colectomy for Left-Sided Colon Cancer: Comparison of Reduced-Port and Conventional Multi-Port Robotic Surgery
    Sung Uk Bae, Woon Kyung Jeong, Seong Kyu Baek
    Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques.2017; 27(4): 398.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal surgery in elderly patients: our experience with DaVinci Xi® System
    A. Oldani, P. Bellora, M. Monni, B. Amato, S. Gentilli
    Aging Clinical and Experimental Research.2017; 29(S1): 91.     CrossRef
  • Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic-assisted surgery for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis
    Xuan Zhang, ZhengQiang Wei, MengJun Bie, XuDong Peng, Cheng Chen
    Surgical Endoscopy.2016; 30(12): 5601.     CrossRef
  • Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
    Yanlai Sun, Huirong Xu, Zengjun Li, Jianjun Han, Wentao Song, Junwei Wang, Zhongfa Xu
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Comparison of perioperative and short-term outcomes between robotic and conventional laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Sungwon Lim, Jin Hee Kim, Se-Jin Baek, Seon-Hahn Kim, Seon Heui Lee
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2016; 90(6): 328.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic digestive surgery: Present and future directions
    Juan C Rodríguez-Sanjuán
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2016; 22(6): 1975.     CrossRef
  • Effect of BMI on Short-Term Outcomes with Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery: a Case-Matched Study
    Deborah S. Keller, Nisreen Madhoun, Juan Ramon Flores-Gonzalez, Sergio Ibarra, Reena Tahilramani, Eric M. Haas
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2016; 20(3): 488.     CrossRef
  • Robotic single docking total colectomy for ulcerative colitis: First experience with a novel technique
    Franco Roviello, Riccardo Piagnerelli, Francesco Ferrara, Maximilian Scheiterle, Lorenzo De Franco, Daniele Marrelli
    International Journal of Surgery.2015; 21: 63.     CrossRef
  • Is robot-assisted laparoscopic right colectomy more effective than the conventional laparoscopic procedure? A meta-analysis of short-term outcomes
    Fabio Rondelli, Ruben Balzarotti, Fabio Villa, Adriano Guerra, Nicola Avenia, Enrico Mariani, Walter Bugiantella
    International Journal of Surgery.2015; 18: 75.     CrossRef
  • Robotic colonic resection
    Emmanouil P. Pappou, Martin R. Weiser
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2015; 112(3): 315.     CrossRef
  • European association of endoscopic surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery
    Amir Szold, Roberto Bergamaschi, Ivo Broeders, Jenny Dankelman, Antonello Forgione, Thomas Langø, Andreas Melzer, Yoav Mintz, Salvador Morales-Conde, Michael Rhodes, Richard Satava, Chung-Ngai Tang, Ramon Vilallonga
    Surgical Endoscopy.2015; 29(2): 253.     CrossRef
  • Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Seon Heui Lee, Sungwon Lim, Jin Hee Kim, Kil Yeon Lee
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2015; 89(4): 190.     CrossRef
  • Robot-assisted single-incision total colectomy: a case report
    Yen-Yi Juo, Vincent Obias
    The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2015; 11(1): 104.     CrossRef
  • Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colonic disease: a meta-analysis of postoperative variables
    Alberto Zarak, Alvaro Castillo, Kandace Kichler, Lucy de la Cruz, Leonardo Tamariz, Srinivas Kaza
    Surgical Endoscopy.2015; 29(6): 1341.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Colorectal Surgery Compared with Laparoscopic and Open Surgery: a Systematic Review
    Chang Woo Kim, Chang Hee Kim, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2014; 18(4): 816.     CrossRef
  • Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
    Ioannis G. Papanikolaou
    Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2014; 24(6): 478.     CrossRef
  • Robotic versus laparoscopic right colectomy: a meta-analysis
    Huirong Xu, Jianning Li, Yanlai Sun, Zengjun Li, Yanan Zhen, Bin Wang, Zhongfa Xu
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2014; 12(1): 274.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes and Costs Associated With Robotic Colectomy in the Minimally Invasive Era
    Joshua A. Tyler, Justin P. Fox, Mayur M. Desai, W. Brian Perry, Sean C. Glasgow
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2013; 56(4): 458.     CrossRef
  • Robotic Colonic Surgery
    Andrew Kai-Yip Fung, Emad H. Aly
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2013; 56(6): 786.     CrossRef
  • Lap Colectomy and Robotics for Colon Cancer
    Eduardo Parra-Davila, Sonia Ramamoorthy
    Surgical Oncology Clinics of North America.2013; 22(1): 143.     CrossRef
Review
Optimal Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: the Role of Robotic Surgery from an Expert's View
Nam-Kyu Kim, Jeonghyun Kang
J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010;26(6):377-387.   Published online December 31, 2010
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/jksc.2010.26.6.377
  • 5,631 View
  • 43 Download
  • 67 Citations
AbstractAbstract PDF

Total mesorectal excision (TME) has gained worldwide acceptance as a standard surgical technique in the treatment of rectal cancer. Ever since laparoscopic surgery was first applied to TME for rectal cancer, with increasing penetration rates, especially in Asia, an unstable camera platform, the limited mobility of straight laparoscopic instruments, the two-dimensional imaging, and a poor ergonomic position for surgeons have been regarded as limitations. Robotic technology was developed in an attempt to reduce the limitations of laparoscopic surgery. The robotic system has many advantages, including a more ergonomic position, stable camera platform and stereoscopic view, as well as elimination of tremor and subsequent improved dexterity. Current comparison data between robotic and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery show similar intraoperative results and morbidity, postoperative recovery, and short-term oncologic outcomes. Potential benefits of a robotic system include reduction of surgeon's fatigue during surgery, improved performance and safety for intracorporeal suture, reduction of postoperative complications, sharper and more meticulous dissection, and completion of autonomic nerve preservation techniques. However, the higher cost for a robotic system still remains an obstacle to wide application, and many socioeconomic issues remain to be solved in the future. In addition, we need more concrete evidence regarding the merits for both patients and surgeons, as well as the merits compared to conventional laparoscopic techniques. Therefore, we need large-scale prospective randomized clinical trials to prove the potential benefits of robot TME for the treatment of rectal cancer.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by  
  • The urinary and sexual outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Hua Yang, Lei Zhou
    Surgery Today.2024; 54(5): 397.     CrossRef
  • Deep neuromuscular block attenuates intra‐abdominal pressure and inflammation and improves post‐operative cognition in prostate cancer patients following robotic‐assisted radical prostatectomy
    Guangjun Hu, Weidong Shao, Zhuo Chen, Bixi Li, Bo Xu
    The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2024;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic surgery is associated with a decreased risk of circumferential resection margin positivity compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery in patients with rectal cancer undergoing mesorectal excision: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Mitsuru Ishizuka, Norisuke Shibuya, Hiroyuki Hachiya, Yusuke Nishi, Takahiro Kono, Masashi Takayanagi, Tetsutaro Nemoto, Keisuke Ihara, Takayuki Shiraki, Takatsugu Matsumoto, Shozo Mori, Takatoshi Nakamura, Taku Aoki, Tsunekazu Mizushima
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2024; 50(10): 108538.     CrossRef
  • Learning curve of robotic rectal surgery using risk-adjusted cumulative summation: a 5-year institutional experience
    Hiroshi Oshio, Tsuneo Konta, Yukiko Oshima, Gen Yunome, Shinji Okazaki, Ichiro Kawamura, Yuya Ashitomi, Masaaki Kawai, Hiroaki Musha, Fuyuhiko Motoi
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.2023;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Risk factors for and longitudinal course of male sexual dysfunction after robotic rectal cancer surgery
    Marie Hanaoka, Hiroyasu Kagawa, Akio Shiomi, Hitoshi Hino, Shoichi Manabe, Yusuke Yamaoka, Yusuke Kinugasa
    Colorectal Disease.2023; 25(5): 932.     CrossRef
  • Comparing minimally invasive surgical and open approaches to pelvic exenteration for locally advanced or recurrent pelvic malignancies - Systematic review and meta-analysis
    Odhrán K. Ryan, Katie L. Doogan, Éanna J. Ryan, Mark Donnelly, Ian S. Reynolds, Ben Creavin, Matthew G. Davey, Michael E. Kelly, Rory Kennelly, Ann Hanly, Seán T. Martin, Des C. Winter
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2023; 49(8): 1362.     CrossRef
  • Current Status of Robotic Gastrointestinal Surgery
    Keisuke Minamimura, Keisuke Hara, Satoshi Matsumoto, Tomohiko Yasuda, Hiroki Arai, Daisuke Kakinuma, Yukio Ohshiro, Youichi Kawano, Masanori Watanabe, Hideyuki Suzuki, Hiroshi Yoshida
    Journal of Nippon Medical School.2023; 90(4): 308.     CrossRef
  • Potential urinary function benefits of initial robotic surgery for rectal cancer in the introductory phase
    Hiroshi Oshio, Yukiko Oshima, Gen Yunome, Mitsuyasu Yano, Shinji Okazaki, Yuya Ashitomi, Hiroaki Musha, Yukinori Kamio, Fuyuhiko Motoi
    Journal of Robotic Surgery.2022; 16(1): 159.     CrossRef
  • Colorectal cancer surgery: by Cambridge Medical Robotics Versius Surgical Robot System—a single-institution study. Our experience
    Shailesh P. Puntambekar, K. N. Rajesh, Arjun Goel, Mangesh Hivre, Suyog Bharambe, Mihir Chitale, Mangesh Panse
    Journal of Robotic Surgery.2022; 16(3): 587.     CrossRef
  • Surgical approach for rectal cancer: A network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, robotic and transanal TME approaches
    Odhrán K. Ryan, Éanna J. Ryan, Ben Creavin, Emanuele Rausa, Michael E. Kelly, Fausto Petrelli, Gianluca Bonitta, Rory Kennelly, Ann Hanly, Seán T. Martin, Des C. Winter
    European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2021; 47(2): 285.     CrossRef
  • Predictive and Diagnostic Biomarkers of Anastomotic Leakage: A Precision Medicine Approach for Colorectal Cancer Patients
    Mark Gray, Jamie R. K. Marland, Alan F. Murray, David J. Argyle, Mark A. Potter
    Journal of Personalized Medicine.2021; 11(6): 471.     CrossRef
  • Transanal total mesorectal excision and transabdominal robotic surgery for rectal cancer: A retrospective study
    Hiroshi Oshio, Yukiko Oshima, Gen Yunome, Shinji Okazaki, Ichiro Kawamura, Yuya Ashitomi, Hiroaki Musha, Masaaki Kawai, Fuyuhiko Motoi
    Annals of Medicine and Surgery.2021; 70: 102902.     CrossRef
  • Comparison of the quality of total mesorectal excision after robotic and laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a multicenter, propensity score-matched study
    Keehyun Park, Sohyun Kim, Hye Won Lee, Sung Uk Bae, Seong Kyu Baek, Woon Kyung Jeong
    Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology.2021; 17(2): 82.     CrossRef
  • Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Operative Technique and Review of the Literature
    Hidetoshi Katsuno, Tsunekazu Hanai, Koji Masumori, Yoshikazu Koide, Keigo Ashida, Hiroshi Matsuoka, Yosuke Tajima, Tomoyoshi Endo, Masahiro Mizuno, Yeongcheol Cheong, Kotaro Maeda, Ichiro Uyama
    Journal of the Anus, Rectum and Colon.2020; 4(1): 14.     CrossRef
  • Robotics Total Mesorectal Excision Up To the Minute
    Homoud Alawfi, Ho Seung Kim, Seung Yoon Yang, Nam Kyu Kim
    Indian Journal of Surgical Oncology.2020; 11(4): 552.     CrossRef
  • Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer (RALS): A Review of the Literature
    Emil T. Filipov, Tsvetomir M. Ivanov
    Journal of Biomedical and Clinical Research.2020; 13(2): 100.     CrossRef
  • Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter‐preserving total mesorectal excision: A propensity case‐matched analysis
    Pavan Sugoor, Kamlesh Verma, Aditi Chaturvedi, Sadhana Kannan, Ashwin Desouza, Vikas Ostwal, Reena Engineer, Avanish Saklani
    The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2019;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic vs laparoscopic rectal tumour surgery: a cohort study
    D. Asklid, R. Gerjy, F. Hjern, K. Pekkari, U. O. Gustafsson
    Colorectal Disease.2019; 21(2): 191.     CrossRef
  • Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Xi-Yu Sun, Lai Xu, Jun-Yang Lu, Guan-Nan Zhang
    Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies.2019; 28(3): 135.     CrossRef
  • Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer and Cost-Effectiveness
    Youngbae Jeon, Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    The Journal of Minimally Invasive Surgery.2019; 22(4): 139.     CrossRef
  • The short-term outcomes of robotic sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer: comparison with open and laparoscopic surgery using a propensity score analysis
    Soichiro Ishihara, Tomomichi Kiyomatsu, Kazushige Kawai, Toshiaki Tanaka, Keisuke Hata, Shinsuke Kazama, Eiji Sunami, Hiroaki Nozawa, Toshiaki Watanabe
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2018; 33(8): 1047.     CrossRef
  • The impact of robotic surgery on quality of life, urinary and sexual function following total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a propensity score‐matched analysis with laparoscopic surgery
    H. J. Kim, G.‐S. Choi, J. S. Park, S. Y. Park, C. S. Yang, H. J. Lee
    Colorectal Disease.2018;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic vs Robotic Surgery in Colorectal Cases
    Shalmali Alva
    World Journal of Laparoscopic Surgery with DVD.2018; 11(1): 43.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for mid and low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy and the effect of learning curve
    Yu-Min Huang, Yan Jiun Huang, Po-Li Wei
    Medicine.2017; 96(40): e8171.     CrossRef
  • Use of the new da Vinci Xi® during robotic rectal resection for cancer: a pilot matched-case comparison with the da Vinci Si®
    Luca Morelli, Simone Guadagni, Gregorio Di Franco, Matteo Palmeri, Giovanni Caprili, Cristiano D'Isidoro, Luigi Cobuccio, Emanuele Marciano, Giulio Di Candio, Franco Mosca
    The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery.2017; 13(1): e1728.     CrossRef
  • Long-term oncological outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision of mid–low rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy
    Dae Ro Lim, Sung Uk Bae, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
    Surgical Endoscopy.2017; 31(4): 1728.     CrossRef
  • Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
    Yanlai Sun, Huirong Xu, Zengjun Li, Jianjun Han, Wentao Song, Junwei Wang, Zhongfa Xu
    World Journal of Surgical Oncology.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Totally robotic rectal resection: an experience of the first 100 consecutive cases
    J. Ahmed, M. Nasir, K. Flashman, J. Khan, A. Parvaiz
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2016; 31(4): 869.     CrossRef
  • Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Medium-Term Comparative Outcomes from a Multicenter Study
    Carlo Corbellini, Roberto Biffi, Fabrizio Luca, Antonio Chiappa, Stefano Costa, Emilio Bertani, Stefano Bona, Davide Lombardi, Darina Tamayo, Edoardo Botteri, Bruno Andreoni
    Tumori Journal.2016; 102(4): 414.     CrossRef
  • Outcomes in 132 patients following laparoscopic total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer with greater than 5-year follow-up
    John H. Marks, Renee Huang, Dominique McKeever, Morgan Greenfield
    Surgical Endoscopy.2016; 30(1): 307.     CrossRef
  • Effects of robotic rectal surgery on sexual and urinary functions in male patients
    Shinji Ozeki, Kotaro Maeda, Tsunekazu Hanai, Koji Masumori, Hidetoshi Katsuno, Hiroshi Takahashi
    Surgery Today.2016; 46(4): 491.     CrossRef
  • Robotic Surgery for Colon and Rectal Cancer
    Eun Jung Park, Seung Hyuk Baik
    Current Oncology Reports.2016;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • A population-based study comparing laparoscopic and robotic outcomes in colorectal surgery
    Michael S. Tam, Christodoulos Kaoutzanis, Andrew J. Mullard, Scott E. Regenbogen, Michael G. Franz, Samantha Hendren, Greta Krapohl, James F. Vandewarker, Richard M. Lampman, Robert K. Cleary
    Surgical Endoscopy.2016; 30(2): 455.     CrossRef
  • Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Case-Matched Study of Short-Term Outcomes
    Yong Sok Kim, Min Jung Kim, Sung Chan Park, Dae Kyung Sohn, Dae Yong Kim, Hee Jin Chang, Byung-Ho Nam, Jae Hwan Oh
    Cancer Research and Treatment.2016; 48(1): 225.     CrossRef
  • A Pooled Analysis of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
    Yue Wang, Guo-Hua Zhao, Helen Yang, Jie Lin
    Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques.2016; 26(3): 259.     CrossRef
  • Robotics in Colorectal Surgery
    Allison Weaver, Scott Steele
    F1000Research.2016; 5: 2373.     CrossRef
  • Recent advances in robotic surgery for rectal cancer
    Soichiro Ishihara, Kensuke Otani, Koji Yasuda, Takeshi Nishikawa, Junichiro Tanaka, Toshiaki Tanaka, Tomomichi Kiyomatsu, Keisuke Hata, Kazushige Kawai, Hiroaki Nozawa, Shinsuke Kazama, Hironori Yamaguchi, Eiji Sunami, Joji Kitayama, Toshiaki Watanabe
    International Journal of Clinical Oncology.2015; 20(4): 633.     CrossRef
  • Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: a Meta-analysis of Eight Studies
    Binghong Xiong, Li Ma, Wei Huang, Qikang Zhao, Yong Cheng, Jingshan Liu
    Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery.2015; 19(3): 516.     CrossRef
  • Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves
    George Melich, Young Ki Hong, Jieun Kim, Hyuk Hur, Seung Hyuk Baik, Nam Kyu Kim, A. Sender Liberman, Byung Soh Min
    Surgical Endoscopy.2015; 29(3): 558.     CrossRef
  • Robotic rectal surgery
    Ahmet Rencuzogullari, Emre Gorgun
    Journal of Surgical Oncology.2015; 112(3): 326.     CrossRef
  • The Role of Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer: Overcoming Technical Challenges in Laparoscopic Surgery by Advanced Techniques
    Seungwan Park, Nam Kyu Kim
    Journal of Korean Medical Science.2015; 30(7): 837.     CrossRef
  • SAGES TAVAC safety and effectiveness analysis: da Vinci® Surgical System (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA)
    Shawn Tsuda, Dmitry Oleynikov, Jon Gould, Dan Azagury, Bryan Sandler, Matthew Hutter, Sharona Ross, Eric Haas, Fred Brody, Richard Satava
    Surgical Endoscopy.2015; 29(10): 2873.     CrossRef
  • Robotic and laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes of 21 consecutive series
    Sung Uk Bae, Avanish P. Saklani, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
    Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2014; 86(2): 76.     CrossRef
  • Comparative effectiveness of laparoscopic versus robot-assisted colorectal resection
    Deborah S. Keller, Anthony J. Senagore, Justin K. Lawrence, Brad J. Champagne, Conor P. Delaney
    Surgical Endoscopy.2014; 28(1): 212.     CrossRef
  • Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis
    Binghong Xiong, Li Ma, CaiQuan Zhang, Yong Cheng
    Journal of Surgical Research.2014; 188(2): 404.     CrossRef
  • Robotic assisted minimally invasive pelvic exenteration in advanced rectal cancer: review and case report
    P. R. Nanayakkara, S. A. Ahmed, D. Oudit, S. T. O’Dwyer, C. R. Selvasekar
    Journal of Robotic Surgery.2014; 8(2): 173.     CrossRef
  • Robotic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence
    E. H. Aly
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease.2014; 29(1): 1.     CrossRef
  • Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases
    M. Barnajian, D. Pettet, E. Kazi, C. Foppa, R. Bergamaschi
    Colorectal Disease.2014; 16(8): 603.     CrossRef
  • Robotic surgery for rectal cancer: Current immediate clinical and oncological outcomes
    Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo
    World Journal of Gastroenterology.2014; 20(39): 14359.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic versus Robotic-assisted Rectal Surgery: A Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes
    Monica T. Young, Gopal Menon, Timothy F. Feldmann, Steven Mills, Joseph Carmichael, Michael J. Stamos, Alessio Pigazzi
    The American Surgeon™.2014; 80(10): 1059.     CrossRef
  • Laparoscopic Surgery for Rectal Cancer
    Suguru Hasegawa, Koya Hida, Kenji Kawada, Yoshiharu Sakai
    Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2013; 66(10): 971.     CrossRef
  • The current status of robotic oncologic surgery
    Hua‐yin Yu, David F. Friedlander, Sunil Patel, Jim C. Hu
    CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians.2013; 63(1): 45.     CrossRef
  • Mechanical Bowel Preparation and Prophylactic Antibiotic Administration in Colorectal Surgery: A Survey of the Current Status in Korea
    Byung Mo Kang, Kil Yeon Lee, Sun Jin Park, Suk-Hwan Lee
    Annals of Coloproctology.2013; 29(4): 160.     CrossRef
  • Impact of Robotic Surgery on Sexual and Urinary Functions After Fully Robotic Nerve-Sparing Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer
    Fabrizio Luca, Manuela Valvo, Tiago Leal Ghezzi, Massimiliano Zuccaro, Sabina Cenciarelli, Cristina Trovato, Angelica Sonzogni, Roberto Biffi
    Annals of Surgery.2013; 257(4): 672.     CrossRef
  • Unique Complications of Robotic Colorectal Surgery
    Sonia Ramamoorthy, Vincent Obias
    Surgical Clinics of North America.2013; 93(1): 273.     CrossRef
  • Robot-assisted low anterior resection in fifty-three consecutive patients: an Indian experience
    R. D. Kenawadekar, R. Z. Dhange, A. Pandit, M. S. Bandawar, S. Joshi, G. Agarwal, A. P. Jagtap, S. Puntambekar
    Journal of Robotic Surgery.2013; 7(4): 311.     CrossRef
  • Does Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery Offer Improved Early Postoperative Outcomes?
    Rosaria Scarpinata, Emad H. Aly
    Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2013; 56(2): 253.     CrossRef
  • Initial experience of robotic intersphincteric resection for rectal cancer
    Soo Yun Moon, Min-Su Park, Sun Jin Park, Kil Yeon Lee
    Korean Journal of Clinical Oncology.2013; 9(1): 42.     CrossRef
  • Current Status and Future Perspectives of Robotic Surgery for Colorectal Cancer
    Hidetoshi Katsuno, Koutarou Maeda, Tsunekaze Hanai, Harunobu Sato, Koji Masumori, Yoshikazu Koide, Hiroshi Matsuoka, Miho Shiota, Tomoyoshi Endo, Shinji Matsuoka, Kohei Hatta, Masahiro Mizuno, Kunihiro Tohyama
    Nippon Daicho Komonbyo Gakkai Zasshi.2013; 66(10): 982.     CrossRef
  • Artificial interfaces (“AI”) in surgery: Historic development, current status and program implementation in the public health sector
    Donagh A. Healy, Shane P. Murphy, John P. Burke, John C. Coffey
    Surgical Oncology.2013; 22(2): 77.     CrossRef
  • Robotic Use in Colorectal Disease: A Critical Analysis
    Marco Ettore Allaix, Alessandro Fichera
    Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2013; 24(1): 14.     CrossRef
  • Oncologic Outcomes of a Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer: Results of a 3-Year Follow-up
    Jung Hoon Cho, Dae Ro Lim, Hyuk Hur, Byung Soh Min, Seung Hyuk Baik, Kang Young Lee, Nam Kyu Kim
    Journal of the Korean Society of Coloproctology.2012; 28(1): 42.     CrossRef
  • Current status of robotic rectal cancer surgery
    Jeonghyun Kang, Kang Young Lee
    Colorectal Cancer.2012; 1(6): 525.     CrossRef
  • Robotic resection compared with laparoscopic rectal resection for cancer: systematic review and meta‐analysis of short‐term outcome
    S. Trastulli, E. Farinella, R. Cirocchi, D. Cavaliere, N. Avenia, F. Sciannameo, N. Gullà, G. Noya, C. Boselli
    Colorectal Disease.2012;[Epub]     CrossRef
  • Robotic versus Laparoscopic Proctectomy for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-analysis
    Sameer Memon, Alexander G. Heriot, Declan G. Murphy, Mathias Bressel, A. Craig Lynch
    Annals of Surgical Oncology.2012; 19(7): 2095.     CrossRef
  • Robotic Colorectal Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Sami AlAsari, Byung Soh Min
    ISRN Surgery.2012; 2012: 1.     CrossRef
  • Risk Factor Analysis of Postoperative Complications After Robotic Rectal Cancer Surgery
    Jeonghyun Kang, Byung Soh Min, Yoon Ah Park, Hyuk Hur, Seung Hyuk Baik, Nam Kyu Kim, Seung Kook Sohn, Kang Young Lee
    World Journal of Surgery.2011; 35(11): 2555.     CrossRef
  • FirstFirst
  • PrevPrev
  • Page of 1
  • Next Next
  • Last Last

Ann Coloproctol : Annals of Coloproctology Twitter Facebook
TOP