Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Original Articles

Anorectal benign disease

Immediate sphincter repair following fistulotomy for anal fistula: does it impact the healing rate and septic complications?: Maher A. Abbas, Anna T. Tsay, Mohammad Abbass; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(3):217-224. Published online June 28, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.01144.0163

9,199 View
277 Download
2 Web of Science
4 Citations

Purpose
Fistulotomy is considered the most effective treatment for anal fistula; however, it carries a risk of incontinence. Sphincteroplasty in the setting of fistulotomy is not standard practice due to concerns regarding healing and potential infectious complications. We aimed to compare the outcomes of patients who underwent fistulotomy with primary sphincteroplasty to those who did not undergo repair.
Methods
This was a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent fistulotomy for cryptoglandular anal fistula. All operations were performed by one colorectal surgeon. Sphincteroplasty was performed for patients perceived to be at higher risk for continence disturbance. The main outcome measures were the healing rate and postoperative septic complications.
Results
In total, 152 patients were analyzed. Group A (fistulotomy with sphincteroplasty) consisted of 45 patients and group B (fistulotomy alone) included 107 patients. Both groups were similar in age (P=0.16) and sex (P=0.20). Group A had higher proportions of multiple fistulas (26.7% vs. 6.5%, P<0.01) and complex fistulas (mid to high transsphincteric, 37.8% vs. 10.3%; P<0.01) than group B. The median follow-up time was 8 weeks. The overall healing rate was similar in both groups (93.3% vs. 90.6%, P=0.76). No significant difference between the 2 groups was noted in septic complications (6.7% vs. 3.7%, P=0.42).
Conclusion
Fistulotomy with primary sphincter repair demonstrated a comparable healing rate to fistulotomy alone, without an increased risk of postoperative septic complications. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to confirm these findings and to explore the functional outcomes of patients who undergo sphincteroplasty.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Is Primary Opening of Fistula-in-Ano Always at Dentate Line: Correlation Between MRI and Operative Findings in 379 Patients
Pankaj Garg, Gabriele Naldini, Vincent De Parades, Petr Tsarkov, Vipul Yagnik, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Baljit Kaur, G Mahak
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology.2025; Volume 18: 121. CrossRef
Clinical outcome of fistulectomy with partial sphincter preservation in complex fistula-in-ano in a tertiary hospital of Bangladesh
Jalal Ahmed, M. Meher Ullah, Asif Aman, Satya Ranjan Mondal, Sabrina Akhter Qurashi, Golam Mustafa, Ahsan Habib, Imtiaz Faruk
International Surgery Journal.2025; 12(7): 1131. CrossRef
Sequential Surgical Management of a Recurrent Complex Transsphincteric Anal Fistula With Sphincter Disruption: A Case Report
Diego Pérez-Valdez, Alfredo Sinahi Abarca-Magallón, Samuel Hernández-Alvarado, Daniel Castañeda-Rodríguez, Daniel Alejandro Valdivieso-Siguenza
Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Achieving a high cure rate in complex anal fistulas: understanding the conceptual role of the Garg cardinal principles
Pankaj Garg, Nicola Clemente, James C. W. Khaw
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(5): 521. CrossRef

Benign GI diease,Benign diesease & IBD

Long-term evolution of continence and quality of life after sphincteroplasty for obstetric fecal incontinence: Vicente Pla-Martí, Jose Martín-Arévalo, Rosa Martí-Fernández, David Moro-Valdezate, Stephanie García-Botello, Alejandro Espí-Macías, Miguel Mínguez-Pérez, Maria Dolores Ruiz-Carmona, Jose Vicente Roig-Vila; Ann Coloproctol. 2022;38(1):13-19. Published online September 18, 2020; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2020.09.16

7,188 View
222 Download
9 Web of Science
11 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
This study was performed to evaluate the long-term evolution of continence and patient’s quality of life after surgical treatment for obstetric fecal incontinence.
Methods
A prospective longitudinal study was conducted including consecutive patients who underwent sphincteroplasty for severe obstetric fecal incontinence. The first phase analyzed changes in continence and impact on quality of life. The second phase studied the long-term evolution reevaluating the same group of patients 6 years later. Degree of fecal incontinence was calculated using the Cleveland Clinic Score (CCS). Quality of life assessment was carried out with the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life scale.
Results
Thirty-five patients with median age of 55 years (range, 28 to 73 years) completed the study. Phase 1 results: after a postoperative follow-up of 30 months (4 to 132 months), CCS had improved significantly from a preoperative of 15.7 ± 3.1 to 6.1 ± 5.0 (P < 0.001). Phase 2 results: median follow-up in phase 2 was 110 months (76 to 204 months). The CCS lowered to 8.4 ± 4.9 (P = 0.04). There were no significant differences between phases 1 and 2 in terms of quality of life; lifestyle (3.47 ± 0.75 vs. 3.16 ±1.04), coping/behavior (3.13 ±0.83 vs. 2.80 ±1.09), depression/self-perception (3.65 ±0.80 vs. 3.32 ± 0.98), and embarrassment (3.32 ± 0.90 vs. 3.12 ± 1.00).
Conclusion
Sphincteroplasty offers good short-medium term outcomes in continence and quality of life for obstetric fecal incontinence treatment. Functional clinical results deteriorate over time but did not impact on patients’ quality of life.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and secondary overlapping sphincteroplasty from a colorectal perspective: A Systematic Review
Abdel Latif Khalifa Elnaim, Michael P.K. Wong, Ismail Sagap
Academic Medicine & Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Comparative outcomes of sphincteroplasty and sacral neuromodulation in postmenopausal women with late-onset fecal incontinence following obstetric trauma: a retrospective study
Alessandro Bergna, Andrea Rusconi, Jacques Megevand, Ettore Lillo, Massimo Amboldi, Alessio Lanzaro, Leonardo Lenisa, Ezio Ganio
Updates in Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries: A Urogynecologic Perspective on Detection and Diagnosis
Katarzyna Borycka, Diaa E. E. Rizk
International Urogynecology Journal.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Baiona’s Consensus Statement for Fecal Incontinence. Spanish Association of Coloproctology
Javier Cerdán Miguel, Antonio Arroyo Sebastián, Antonio Codina Cazador, Fernando de la Portilla de Juan, Mario de Miguel Velasco, Alberto de San Ildefonso Pereira, Fernando Jiménez Escovar, Franco Marinello, Mónica Millán Scheiding, Arantxa Muñoz Duyos, M
Cirugía Española (English Edition).2024; 102(3): 158. CrossRef
Diagnostic tools for fecal incontinence: Scoring systems are the crucial first step
Peter Liptak, Martin Duricek, Peter Banovcin
World Journal of Gastroenterology.2024; 30(6): 516. CrossRef
Consenso Baiona sobre Incontinencia Fecal: Asociación Española de Coloproctología
Javier Cerdán Miguel, Antonio Arroyo Sebastián, Antonio Codina Cazador, Fernando de la Portilla de Juan, Mario de Miguel Velasco, Alberto de San Ildefonso Pereira, Fernando Jiménez Escovar, Franco Marinello, Mónica Millán Scheiding, Arantxa Muñoz Duyos, M
Cirugía Española.2024; 102(3): 158. CrossRef
How to Avoid Becoming a Risk Factor of Fecal Incontinence Due to OASIS—A Narrative Review
Nikodem Horst
Journal of Clinical Medicine.2024; 13(17): 5071. CrossRef
The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Fecal Incontinence
Liliana G. Bordeianou, Amy J. Thorsen, Deborah S. Keller, Alexander T. Hawkins, Craig Messick, Lucia Oliveira, Daniel L. Feingold, Amy L. Lightner, Ian M. Paquette
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2023; 66(5): 647. CrossRef
Validation of the Turkish version of the Quality of Life in Patients with Anal Fistula Questionnaire
Mehmet Ali Koç, Kerem Özgü, Derya Gökmen, Mehmet Süha Sevinç, Şiyar Ersöz, Cihangir Akyol
Turkish Journal of Colorectal Disease.2023; 33(4): 124. CrossRef
A systematic review of translation and experimental studies on internal anal sphincter for fecal incontinence
Minsung Kim, Bo-Young Oh, Ji-Seon Lee, Dogeon Yoon, Wook Chun, Il Tae Son
Annals of Coloproctology.2022; 38(3): 183. CrossRef
Is It a Refractory Disease?- Fecal Incontinence; beyond Medication
Chungyeop Lee, Jong Lyul Lee
The Ewha Medical Journal.2022;[Epub] CrossRef

Repair of Rectovaginal Fistulas.: Park, Weon Kap , Hwang, Do Yeon , Kim, Khun Uk; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 1999;15(1):65-71.

1,235 View
25 Download

Abstract PDF: Thirteen women with rectovaginal fistulas unrelated to inflammatory bowel disease or previous radiotherapy were operated on during Jan. 1993 - Jul. 1997 at Song-Do Colorectal Hospital. The mean age was 36.9 (range, 25~56) years. The mean follow-up after operation was 33 (range, 8~62) months. The etiology of the fistula in the majority of patients was obstetric injury and operative trauma (10/13). Seven patients were referred after attempts at repair elsewhere. Eleven patients were managed with a mucosal flap advancement and a 3-layered repair of the rectovaginal septum: 4 without and 7 with a perineal body reconstruction or sphincter repair. Two patients were managed with a mucosal flap advancement only without a repair of rectovaginal septum. In all cases, a concomitant colostomy was not performed. Postoperative complications were noticed in 3 of the patients managed by a mucosal flap advancement and 3-layered repair of the rectovaginal septum with perineal body reconstruction or sphincter repair and all were perineal wound infections. All of these infections were cured, without recurrence, by simple rubber seton drainage. Recurrence occurred in one case managed by a mucosal flap advancement only. Three patients with liquid incontinence became continent after a sphincter reconstruction. We conclude that most rectovaginal fistulas unrelated to inflammatory bowel disease or previous radiotherapy can be managed with a mucosal flap advancement and 3-layered reconstruction of the rectovaginal septum. If any signs or symptoms of sphincter injury are noticed preoperatively while taking the patient's history or during manometry and endorectal ultrasonography, a perineal body reconstruction or sphincter repair should be performed.

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search