Annals of Coloproctology

Display

Sort by :

Original Article

Colorectal cancer

The impact of short-course total neoadjuvant therapy, long-course chemoradiotherapy, and upfront surgery on the technical difficulty of total mesorectal excision: an observational study with an intraoperative perspective: Cheryl Xi-Zi Chong, Frederick H. Koh, Hui-Lin Tan, Sharmini Su Sivarajah, Jia-Lin Ng, Leonard Ming-Li Ho, Darius Kang-Lie Aw, Wen-Hsin Koo, Shuting Han, Si-Lin Koo, Connie Siew-Poh Yip, Fu-Qiang Wang, Fung-Joon Foo, Winson Jianhong Tan; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(5):451-458. Published online September 19, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00899.0128

4,717 View
102 Download
2 Web of Science
4 Citations

Purpose
Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is becoming the standard of care for locally advanced rectal cancer. However, surgery is deferred for months after completion, which may lead to fibrosis and increased surgical difficulty. The aim of this study was to assess whether TNT (TNT-RAPIDO) is associated with increased difficulty of total mesorectal excision (TME) compared with long-course chemoradiotherapy (LCRT) and upfront surgery.
Methods
Twelve laparoscopic videos of low anterior resection with TME for rectal cancer were prospectively collected from January 2020 to October 2021, with 4 videos in each arm. Seven colorectal surgeons assessed the videos independently, graded the difficulty of TME using a visual analog scale and attempted to identify which category the videos belonged to.
Results
The median age was 67 years, and 10 patients were male. The median interval to surgery from radiotherapy was 13 weeks in the LCRT group and 24 weeks in the TNT-RAPIDO group. There was no significant difference in the visual analog scale for difficulty in TME between the 3 groups (LCRT, 3.2; TNT-RAPIDO, 4.6; upfront, 4.1; P=0.12). A subgroup analysis showed similar difficulty between groups (LCRT 3.2 vs. TNT-RAPIDO 4.6, P=0.05; TNT-RAPIDO 4.6 vs. upfront 4.1, P=0.54). During video assessments, surgeons correctly identified the prior treatment modality in 42% of the cases. TNT-RAPIDO videos had the highest recognition rate (71%), significantly outperforming both LCRT (29%) and upfront surgery (25%, P=0.01).
Conclusion
TNT does not appear to increase the surgical difficulty of TME.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Left colic artery–preserving radical rectal cancer surgery: a literature review
Xiyin Yang, Yuanshui Sun, Qiang Hu
Frontiers in Surgery.2026;[Epub] CrossRef
Non-operative management of locally advanced rectal cancer with an emphasis on outcomes and quality of life: a narrative review
In Ja Park
Ewha Medical Journal.2025; 48(3): e40. CrossRef
Clinical implications of radiologic criteria and prognostic factors for lateral lymph node metastasis in low rectal cancer
Gyung Mo Son
Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(6): 489. CrossRef
Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
Jae Seung Kim, Jaram Lee, Hyeung-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4280. CrossRef

Review

Colorectal cancer

The role of lateral pelvic lymph node dissection in advanced rectal cancer: a review of current evidence and outcomes: Gyu-Seog Choi, Hye Jin Kim; Ann Coloproctol. 2024;40(4):363-374. Published online August 30, 2024; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2024.00521.0074

17,038 View
753 Download
10 Web of Science
12 Citations

Abstract PDF

Metastatic lateral pelvic lymph nodes (LPNs) in rectal cancer significantly impact the prognosis and treatment strategies. Western practices emphasize neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), whereas Eastern approaches often rely on LPN dissection (LPND). This review examines the evolving role of LPND in the context of modern treatments, including total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT), and the impact of CRT on the management of clinically suspicious LPNs. We comprehensively reviewed the key literature comparing the outcomes of LPND versus preoperative CRT for rectal cancer, focusing on recent advancements and ongoing debates. Key studies, including the JCOG0212 trial and recent multicenter trials, were analyzed to assess the efficacy of LPND, particularly in conjunction with preoperative CRT or TNT. Current evidence indicates that LPND can reduce local recurrence rates compared to total mesorectal excision alone in patients not receiving radiation therapy. However, the benefit of LPND in the context of neoadjuvant CRT is influenced by the size and pretreatment characteristics of LPNs. While CRT can effectively control smaller metastatic LPNs, larger or clinically suspicious LPNs may require LPND for optimal outcomes. Advances in surgical techniques, such as robotic-assisted LPND, offer potential benefits but also present challenges and complications. The role of TNT in controlling metastatic LPNs and improving patient outcomes is emerging but remains underexplored. The decision to perform LPND should be individualized based on patient-specific factors, including LPN size, response to neoadjuvant treatment, and surgeon expertise. Future research should focus on optimizing treatment protocols and further evaluating the role of TNT in managing metastatic LPNs.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Who is a candidate at the initial presentation? Prediction of positive lateral lymph node and survival after dissection
Y. Lee
Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
The oncologic benefits of lateral lymph node dissection after neoadjuvant therapy – local control or survival?
T. Sammour
Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Locally‐Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Cohort Study Comparing Perioperative Morbidity and Short‐Term Oncological Outcomes
Joseph Mathew, Yogesh Kisan Bansod, Nishant Yadav, Janesh Murugan, Kovvuru Bhaskar Reddy, Mufaddal Kazi, Ashwin DeSouza, Avanish Saklani
Cancer Reports.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic-assisted colorectal surgery in colorectal cancer management: a narrative review of clinical efficacy and multidisciplinary integration
Engeng Chen, Li Chen, Wei Zhang
Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Cirugía por cáncer de recto más allá del mesorrecto: indicaciones, preparación límites y resultados
Blas Flor-Lorente, Mario Javier de Miguel Valencia
Cirugía Española.2025; 103(9): 800202. CrossRef
Surgery for rectal cancer beyond the mesorectum: Indications, preparation, limits, and results
Blas Flor-Lorente, Mario J. de Miguel-Valencia
Cirugía Española (English Edition).2025; 103(9): 800202. CrossRef
Cancer-associated fibroblasts enhance colorectal cancer lymphatic metastasis via CLEC11A/LGR5-mediated WNT pathway activation
Chuhan Zhang, Teng Pan, Yuyuan Zhang, Yushuai Wu, Anning Zuo, Shutong Liu, Yuhao Ba, Benyu Liu, Shuaixi Yang, Yukang Chen, Hui Xu, Peng Luo, Quan Cheng, Siyuan Weng, Long Liu, Xing Zhou, Jingyuan Ning, Xinwei Han, Jinhai Deng, Zaoqu Liu
Journal of Clinical Investigation.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Robotic lateral pelvic lymphadenectomy for rectal cancer—A video vignette
D. Castrodá, M. Paniagua, L. Pérez Corbal, L. Otalora, R. Oubiña, A. Parajó
Colorectal Disease.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Learning curve for lateral lymph node dissection in rectal cancer – a systematic review of literature
D. Kehagias, L. Baldari, E. Cassinotti, L. Boni, C. Lampropoulos, I. Kehagias
Techniques in Coloproctology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Pelvic Neuroanatomy in Colorectal Surgery: Advances in Nerve Preservation for Optimized Functional Outcomes
Asim M. Almughamsi, Yasir Hassan Elhassan
Surgeries.2025; 6(4): 94. CrossRef
Targeting lateral pelvic lymph nodes in rectal cancer: response to neoadjuvant therapy and artificial intelligence driven clinical decision support
Ruiqing Liu, Yun Lu, Luca Stocchi
Intelligent Medicine.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
From the Editor: Uniting expertise, a new era of global collaboration in coloproctology
In Ja Park
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(4): 285. CrossRef

Original Article

Colorectal cancer

Impact of consolidation chemotherapy in poor responders to neoadjuvant radiation therapy: magnetic resonance imaging–based clinical-radiological correlation in high-risk rectal cancers: Swapnil Patel, Suman Ankathi, Purvi Haria, Mufaddal Kazi, Ashwin L. Desouza, Avanish Saklani; Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(6):474-483. Published online December 21, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00080.0011

3,571 View
115 Download
3 Web of Science
3 Citations

Abstract PDF

Purpose
The current study was conducted to examine the role of consolidation chemotherapy after neoadjuvant radiation therapy (NART) in decreasing the involvement of the mesorectal fascia (MRF) in high-risk locally advanced rectal cancers (LARCs).
Methods
In total, 46 patients who received consolidation chemotherapy after NART due to persistent MRF involvement were identified from a database. A team of 2 radiologists, blinded to the clinical data, studied sequential magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans to assess the tumor response and then predict a surgical plan. This prediction was then correlated with the actual procedure conducted as well as histopathological details to assess the impact of consolidation chemotherapy.
Results
The comparison of MRI-based parameters of sequential images showed significant downstaging of T2 signal intensity, tumor height, MRF involvement, diffusion restriction, and N category between sequential MRIs (P < 0.05). However, clinically relevant downstaging (standardized mean difference, > 0.3) was observed for only T2 signal intensity and diffusion restriction on diffusion-weighted imaging. No clinically relevant changes occurred in the remaining parameters; thus, no change was noted in the extent of surgery predicted by MRI. Weak agreement (Cohen κ coefficient, 0.375) and correlation (Spearman rank coefficient, 0.231) were found between MRI-predicted surgery and the actual procedure performed. The comparison of MRI-based and pathological tumor response grading also showed a poor correlation.
Conclusion
Evidence is lacking regarding the use of consolidation chemotherapy in reducing MRF involvement in LARCs. The benefit of additional chemotherapy after NART in decreasing the extent of planned surgery by reducing margin involvement requires prospective research.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk patients with colon cancer regardless of microsatellite instability
Sung Uk Bae, Jong Lyul Lee, Chun-Seok Yang, Eun Jung Park, Soo Yeun Park, Chang Woo Kim, Woong Bae Ji, Gyung Mo Son, Yoon Dae Han, So Hyun Kim, Min Sung Kim, Youn Young Park, Kyung Ha Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Gi Won Ha, JaeIm Lee, Kyeong Eui Kim, Woon Kyung J
European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2025; 51(6): 109674. CrossRef
Non-operative management of locally advanced rectal cancer with an emphasis on outcomes and quality of life: a narrative review
In Ja Park
Ewha Medical Journal.2025; 48(3): e40. CrossRef
The conundrum of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer
Devesh S. Ballal, Tejas P. Vispute, Avanish P. Saklani
Colorectal Disease.2024; 26(5): 1068. CrossRef

Reviews

Colorectal cancer

Total neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: evidence and challenge: Suk-Hwan Lee; Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(4):301-306. Published online August 29, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2023.00269.0038

12,949 View
245 Download
8 Web of Science
9 Citations

Abstract PDF

Recent advances in the management of rectal cancer have dramatically changed the clinical practice of colorectal surgeons because the main focus of rectal cancer treatment has changed from sphincter-saving to an organ-preserving strategies. Modifying the delivery of systemic chemotherapy to improve patients’ survival is another progress in colorectal cancer management, known as total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). TNT is a new strategy used by colorectal surgeons to improve the quality of life and survival of patients after treatment. TNT poses limitations or obstacles, such as overtreatment issues in patients with stage I rectal cancer. However, considering the quality-of-life issues in patients with low-lying rectal cancer necessitating a permanent colostomy, the indication for TNT will be expanded. This review summarizes the recently conducted clinical trials and foresees future perspectives on TNT.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Reply to the Letter to the Editor ‘Circulating tumor DNA after definitive therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer’ by Drs Sorscher and Rocha Lima
A. Bercz, J.J. Smith, P.B. Romesser
Annals of Oncology.2025; 36(2): 224. CrossRef
Neoadjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer from 2015 to 2024: a visual analysis and bibliometric analysis
Boyu Kang, Yihuan Qiao, Jun Zhu, Jipeng Li
Frontiers in Oncology.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Current Surgical Methods in Local Rectal Excision
Kristina Šemanjski, Karla Lužaić, Jure Brkić
Gastrointestinal Tumors.2024; : 1. CrossRef
Tailoring rectal cancer surgery: Surgical approaches and anatomical insights during deep pelvic dissection for optimal outcomes in low‐lying rectal cancer
Youn Young Park, Nam Kyu Kim
Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery.2024; 8(5): 761. CrossRef
A nomogram for predicting the overall survival in rectal cancer patients after total neoadjuvant therapy
Z. Liu, M. He, X. Wang
Techniques in Coloproctology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Impact of the laparoscopic approach, early closure and preoperative stimulation on outcomes of ileostomy closure after rectal resection
Andrea Norte, Carmen Martínez, Ana Pasalodos, Ivette Tort, Anna Sánchez, Pilar Hernández, Jesús Bollo, Eduard Maria Targarona
Cirugía Española (English Edition).2024; 102(11): 590. CrossRef
Impact of the laparoscopic approach, early closure and preoperative stimulation on outcomes of ileostomy closure after rectal resection
Andrea Norte, Carmen Martínez, Ana Pasalodos, Ivette Tort, Anna Sánchez, Pilar Hernández, Jesús Bollo, Eduard Maria Targarona
Cirugía Española.2024; 102(11): 590. CrossRef
Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
Jae Seung Kim, Jaram Lee, Hyeung-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4280. CrossRef
Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341. CrossRef

Colorectal cancer

Total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials: Sergey Sychev, Aleksey Ponomarenko, Stanislav Chernyshov, Mikhail Alekseev, Zaman Mamedli, Dmitriy Kuzmichev, Andrey Polynovskiy, Evgeny Rybakov; Ann Coloproctol. 2023;39(4):289-300. Published online April 11, 2023; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2022.00920.0131

8,396 View
245 Download
10 Web of Science
11 Citations

Abstract PDF Supplementary Material

Purpose
To assess the efficacy of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for rectal carcinoma in comparison with conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT).
Methods
A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was done using NetMetaXL and WinBUGS. This study was registered in PROSPERO on March 3, 2022 (No. CRD-42022307867).
Results
Outcomes of 2,719 patients from 10 randomized trials between 2010 and 2022 were selected. Of these 1,191 (44%) had conventional long-course CRT (50–54 Gy) and capecitabine, 506 (18%) had induction chemotherapy followed by CRT (50–54 Gy) and capecitabine (iTNT), 230 (9%) had long-course CRT (50–54 Gy) followed by consolidation chemotherapy (cTNT), and 792 (29%) undergone modified short-course radiotherapy (25 Gy) with subsequent chemotherapy (mTNT). Total pathologic complete response (pCR) was 20% in the iTNT group, 21% in the mTNT group, 22% in the cTNT group, and 12% in the CRT group. Statistically significant difference in pCR rates was detected when comparing iTNT with CRT (odds ratio [OR], 1.76; 95% credible interval [CrI], 1.06–2.8), mTNT with CRT (OR, 1.90; 95% CrI, 1.25–2.74), and cTNT with CRT groups (OR, 2.54; 95% CrI, 1.26–5.08). No differences were found in R0 resection rates. No significant difference was found in long-term outcomes.
Conclusion
The early administration of systemic chemotherapy in the TNT regimen has improved short-term outcomes, though long-term results are underreported. Randomized trials with survival as the endpoint are necessary to evaluate the possible advantages of TNT modes.

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Network meta-analysis of RTCs for efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment in rectal cancer
Nir Horesh, Sameh Hany Emile, Zoe Garoufalia, Rachel Gefen, Peter Rogers, Pauline Aeschbacher, Ebram Salama, Steven D. Wexner
European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2025; 51(8): 110019. CrossRef
Non-operative management of locally advanced rectal cancer with an emphasis on outcomes and quality of life: a narrative review
In Ja Park
Ewha Medical Journal.2025; 48(3): e40. CrossRef
Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Evaluation of Sequencing, Response, and Toxicity in a Single-Institution Cohort
Maria Cristina Barba, Paola De Franco, Donatella Russo, Elisa Cavalera, Elisa Ciurlia, Sara De Matteis, Giuseppe Di Paola, Corradino Federico, Angela Leone, Antonella Papaleo, Bianca Santo, Dino Rubini, Giuseppe Rubini, Angela Sardaro
Cancers.2025; 17(15): 2416. CrossRef
Predictive Value of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes and Ki-67 for Pathological Response to Total Neoadjuvant Therapy in Rectal Cancer
Amrallah Mohammed, Adel Bakry, Shimaa Gharieb, Amira Hanna, Ahmed Obaya, Waleed Abdelhady, Abdelrahman Metwalli
Journal of Gastrointestinal Cancer.2024; 55(2): 869. CrossRef
Changes in clinical guidelines for the treatment of colorectal cancer in 2024
S. S. Gordeev, M. Yu. Fedyanin, M. V. Chernykh, Ye. G. Rubakov, A. M. Karachun, A. A. Nevolskikh, A. A. Tryakin, Z. Z. Mamedli
Surgery and Oncology.2024; 14(1): 21. CrossRef
Oncological Outcomes and Response Rate After Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis Comparing Induction vs. Consolidation Chemotherapy vs. Standard Chemoradiation
Sergei Bedrikovetski, Luke Traeger, Warren Seow, Nagendra N. Dudi-Venkata, Sudarsha Selva-Nayagam, Michael Penniment, Tarik Sammour
Clinical Colorectal Cancer.2024; 23(4): 326. CrossRef
Executive Summary of the American Radium Society on Appropriate Use Criteria for Nonoperative Management of Rectal Adenocarcinoma: Systematic Review and Guidelines
Christopher J. Anker, Leila T. Tchelebi, J. Eva Selfridge, Salma K. Jabbour, Dmitriy Akselrod, Peter Cataldo, Gerard Abood, Jordan Berlin, Christopher L. Hallemeier, Krishan R. Jethwa, Ed Kim, Timothy Kennedy, Percy Lee, Navesh Sharma, William Small, Vone
International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics.2024; 120(4): 946. CrossRef
Efficacy of Neoadjuvant Hypofractionated Chemoradiotherapy in Elderly Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Analysis
Jae Seung Kim, Jaram Lee, Hyeung-min Park, Soo Young Lee, Chang Hyun Kim, Hyeong Rok Kim
Cancers.2024; 16(24): 4280. CrossRef
A randomized phase 3 trial of total neoadjuvant therapy (induction chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoradiation, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and surgery) vs. standard long-term chemoradiation therapy (neoadjuvant chemoradiation, surgery, and adjuvant chemothera
Freshte Foroughi, Seyed Alireza Javadinia, Roham Salek
Frontiers in Oncology.2024;[Epub] CrossRef
Beyond survival: a comprehensive review of quality of life in rectal cancer patients
Won Beom Jung
Annals of Coloproctology.2024; 40(6): 527. CrossRef
Unveiling the profound advantages of total neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer: a trailblazing exploration
Kyung Uk Jung, Hyung Ook Kim, Hungdai Kim, Donghyoun Lee, Chinock Cheong
Annals of Surgical Treatment and Research.2023; 105(6): 341. CrossRef

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search