Annals of Coloproctology

Original Articles

Surgical Review of the Rectal Villous Adenoma.: Lee, Jong Ho , Kim, Hung Dai , Son, Byung Ho , Yoo, Chang Hak , Park, Yong Lai , Shin, Jun ho , Kim, Yong Shin , Han, Won Kon , Pae, Won Gil; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 1999;15(4):301-306.

1,302 View
7 Download

Abstract PDF: PURPOSE
This study was undertaken to evaluate retrospectively the clinical results of surgery for the rectal villous adenoma.
METHODS
The study took place from the period of Mar. of 1988 to Feb. 1998 at the Dept. of Surgery, Sungkyunkwan Univ., Medical college. The study consisted of : Among the 97 cases diagnosed with colon & rectal villous adenoma, and 59 were rectal villous adenoma, and 42 cases underwent resection. We focused on these 42 cases, especially on the position of tumor, its size, surgical technique, histologic results & keeping close follow up post-surgically.
RESULTS
The sex ratio was 2:1 with male predominence, 18 cases were in their fifties with the average age of 55. In 30 cases, the lesion was situated within the 8 cm of anal verge. The average size of tumor was 3.64 cm. The applied methods were; rectotomy 19 cases, anterior resection 13 cases (including low anterior resection), endoscopic excision and transanal excision were 7 cases, and 2 cases, respectively. And in one case where the tumor size was 14.5 cm and which was situated within 3 cm of anal verge, Miles' operation was conducted. Death due to post-operative complication was not observed. 2 cases of wound infection in postoperation, one case of transient urinary incontinence & hematoma were found. And in the case of explo-laparotomy, anastomosis site leakage, in one case, anastomosis site stricture in 2 cases were noted. malignant cells were observed in total of 73.8%, among these, 80% were from villous adenoma, 70% from tubullovillous adenoma. In the case of tumor size less 1 cm, and tumor size greater than 1 cm, the probability of finding malignant lesion were 33.3% and 76.9%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
We suggest that wideexcision through York-Mason approach is a safe and effective technique for huge villous adenomas of the rectum.

Pathologic Review of the Rectal Villous Adenoma.: Lim, Kyung Uk , Shin, Young Do , Lee, Seok Hwan , Kee, Kee Hyung; J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 1997;13(2):175-182.

1,111 View
2 Download

Abstract PDF: Neoplastic polyps of colon are one of the most risky factors for colorectal cancer. Particularly villous adenomas have more malignant potential than other neoplastic polyps. The preoperative detection of malignant change in villous adenoma is very important to determine treatment modality of patients. We conducted that total twenty-four cases of villous adenoma who were diagnosed and treated at our institution between January 1990 and December 1995 were reviewed retrospectively. The peak incidence of age was 7th decades. And male to female ratio was 2 : 1. Size of the adenoma ranged from 1.2 to 10.7 cm with a mean diameter of 3.9 cm. Five cases(20.8%) were between 1 and 2 cm, 10(41.7%) between 2 and 4 cm, and 9(31.5%) greater than or equal to 4 cm. Location of the adenoma were 10 cases(41.7%) in upper rectum, 8(33.3%) in rectosigmoid, and 6(25.0%) in lower rectum respectively. Pathologic examination of the resected specimen were diagnosed 9(37.5%) as benign villous adenomas, 10(41.7%) as in situ carcinoma, and 5(20.8%) as invasive carcinoma. The diagnostic accuracy to detect in situ carcinoma or invasive carcinoma was endoscopic examination in 66.7 percent and digital examination in 86.7 percent. The grade of in situ carcinoma had not significantly relationship with the size of the adenoma on our study. However, invasive carcinoma was significantly related to adenoma size(P<0.05) as following results zero percent between 1 and 2 cm, 20 percent between 2 and 4 cm, and 33.3 percent greater than or equal to 4 cm. In conclusion, the larger villous adenoma has higher malignant potential, especially greater than or equal to 4 cm in size. Added, the clinical impression of the malignancy on digital examination can be more accurate than preoperative endoscopic examination on our study.

First
Prev
Page of 1
Next
Last

Search