Managing Deep Postanal Space Sepsis via an Intersphincteric Approach: Our Early Experience

Ker-Kan Tan; Dean C. Koh; Charles B. Tsang

doi:10.3393/ac.2013.29.2.55

Articles

Page Path: HOME > Ann Coloproctol > Volume 29(2); 2013 > Article

Original Article Managing Deep Postanal Space Sepsis via an Intersphincteric Approach: Our Early Experience: Ker-Kan Tan, Dean C. Koh, Charles B. Tsang; Annals of Coloproctology 2013;29(2):55-59.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.2.55
Published online: April 30, 2013

Division of Colorectal Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, Singapore.

Correspondence to: Charles B. Tsang, M.D. Division of Colorectal Surgery, University Surgical Cluster, National University Health System, 1E Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119228, Singapore. Tel: +65-67724235, Fax: +65-67778206, drcharlestsang@colorectalclinic.com

• Received: November 5, 2012 • Accepted: March 22, 2013

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

prev next

5,351 Views
81 Download
16 Crossref
19 Scopus

Full Article

Download PDF

Abstract
INTRODUCTION
METHODS
RESULTS
DISCUSSION
ARTICLE INFORMATION
REFERENCES

Abstract

Purpose
Managing deep postanal (DPA) sepsis often involves multiple procedures over a long time. An intersphincteric approach allows adequate drainage to be performed while tackling the primary pathology at the same sitting. The aim of our study was to evaluate this novel technique in managing DPA sepsis.
Methods
A retrospective review of all patients who underwent this intersphincteric technique in managing DPA sepsis from February 2008 to October 2010 was performed. All surgeries were performed by the same surgeon.
Results
Seventeen patients with a median age of 43 years (range, 32 to 71 years) and comprised of 94.1% (n = 16) males formed the study group. In all patients, an internal opening in the posterior midline with a tract leading to the deep postanal space was identified. This intersphincteric approach operation was adopted as the primary procedure in 12 patients (70.6%) and was successful in 11 (91.7%). In the only failure, the sepsis recurred, and a successful advancement flap procedure was eventually performed. Five other patients (29.4%) underwent this same procedure as a secondary procedure after an initial drainage operation. Only one was successful. In the remaining four patients, one had a recurrent abscess that required drainage while the other three patients had a tract between the internal opening and the intersphincteric incision. They subsequently underwent a drainage procedure with seton insertion and advancement flap procedures.
Conclusion
Managing DPA space sepsis via an intersphincteric approach is successful in 70.6% of patients. This single-staged technique allows for effective drainage of the sepsis and removal of the primary pathology in the intersphincteric space.
Keywords: Abscess; Treatment outcome; Anal gland; Fistula

INTRODUCTION

The principles in the management of deep postanal (DPA) space sepsis have remained consistent through the years [1-4]. These include removing any infected collection through a drainage procedure, followed by a definitive procedure to eradicate the source of sepsis.

Numerous surgical procedures have been described in the treatment of DPA space sepsis [5-7]. These include a posterior midline sphincterotomy, the seton technique, a fistulotomy and an advancement flap procedure. However, these patients often require multiple operations that are associated with complications such as treatment failure, recurrence and incontinence [5-7].

Following the same principles as those for the ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract technique pioneered by Rojanasakul et al. [8, 9] from Thailand for the management of a transsphincteric fistula, the authors propose an intersphincteric approach to manage DPA space sepsis. This novel technique essentially allows for drainage of the abscess, removal of the source of sepsis, i.e., the anal crypt gland, and ligation and resection of the fistula tract in the intersphincteric space while preserving the integrity of the anal sphincter without dividing any muscles. The aim of this study was to review our initial surgical experience using this new technique in managing DPA space sepsis.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients who underwent this intersphincteric procedure for DPA space sepsis from February 2008 to October 2010 was performed. Only patients with abscesses and fistulas of cryptoglandular origin were included in this study. All patients underwent preoperative endoanal ultrasonography (EAUS) to confirm the presence and the extent of the pathology (Fig. 1 and 2). The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board.

Operative technique

Following preoperative bowel preparation using a sodium-phosphate enema, the patients were placed in the prone jack-knife position after the induction of general anaesthesia. An Eisenhammer anal retractor was first inserted into the anal canal and the intersphincteric groove was identified. A 2- to 3-cm curvilinear skin incision was made posterior to the intersphincteric groove as guided by the preoperative EAUS. A Lone Star Retractor System (Cooper Surgical, Trumbull, CT, USA) was then placed, and the incision was deepened using electrocautery. The intersphincteric space was developed in a cephalad direction, and the indurated intersphincteric tract/tissue on the lateral surface of the internal sphincter was identified (Fig. 3). Continually and superiorly along the intersphincteric plane and then over the external sphincter posteriorly, the DPA space was entered, allowing the abscess to be drained and the cavity to be curetted (Fig. 4). Following that, the internal opening on the surface of the internal sphincter was closed using 4/0 absorbable monofilament polydioxanone sutures.

Irrigation of the DPA cavity and its extensions was then performed before placement of a Redivac suction drain (Medinorm, Quierschied, Germany) into the DPA cavity to facilitate continual drainage. Approximation of the internal and the external sphincter muscles and the skin was performed using 4/0 polyglactin sutures. The infected tissues from the DPA space were sent for culture and sensitivity tests.

Follow-up

All patients were discharged with a one-week course of oral antibiotics (amoxycillin-clavulanate or ciprofloxacin and metronidazole) and were reviewed by the senior author in the outpatient clinic one week following surgery. The drain was removed when the drainage was deemed to be minimal. Success was defined as the absence of any recurrence and the complete healing of the intersphincteric wound. An additional course of appropriate antibiotics would be administered should the cultures reveal a multi-resistant organism.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients, with a median age of 43 years (range, 32 to 71 years) and including 16 males (94.1%), formed the study group. All the patients presented with an abscess collection in the DPA space, which was confirmed on EAUS. In all patients, an internal opening in the posterior midline was identified, with a tract leading to the DPA space. An external opening was present in eight patients (47.1%).

This intersphincteric approach technique was adopted as the primary procedure in twelve patients (70.6%) (Table 1). Five of these patients had had simple incision and drainage procedures performed between 8 months and 12 years earlier. Eleven (91.7%) had successful outcomes. The only failure (8.3%) was a recurrence of the DPA space abscess 15 weeks after the initial procedure. That patient subsequently underwent a drainage procedure with seton placement. This was followed by a successful advancement flap procedure 6 weeks later.

The other group consisted of five patients (29.4%) (Table 2) who had undergone this procedure only after an initial drainage operation. This was defined in our series as an operation to drain the abscess within the 6 months immediately preceding this procedure. Only two of these patients had an external opening suggestive of an underlying fistula. The median time from the previous drainage operation to this intersphincteric approach procedure was 6 weeks (4 to 19 weeks). The five patients returned with symptoms and signs suggestive of an underlying abscess that was concurrently drained during the intersphincteric approach procedure. For four of them (80.0%), the procedure failed, and they required further operations. Three of them developed a tract from the internal opening to the intersphincteric incision site. Two of the three underwent successful advancement flap procedures at 4 and 10 months after the intersphincteric procedures. The third patient underwent a drainage procedure with seton insertion. He then refused further surgery. The last patient who experienced a failed procedure developed a unilateral ischioanal abscess six weeks postoperatively, and this necessitated a drainage procedure. Intra-operatively, the previous internal opening remained closed.

Over a median follow-up of 8 months (5 to 32 months), the overall success rate of this intersphincteric procedure in managing DPA space sepsis was 70.6%. A flowchart depicting the progress and the outcome for all our patients following their surgeries is shown in Fig. 5.

DISCUSSION

The management of DPA space abscesses continues to pose numerous challenges to colorectal surgeons worldwide [1-4]. Some of the most common procedures that have been described in the treatment of DPA space sepsis include a fistulotomy, a posterior midline sphincterotomy, a seton technique and an advancement flap procedure. Whilst techniques such as a fistulotomy and a posterior midline sphincterotomy and de-roofing of the abscess cavities were coupled with high success rates, surgeons are still uncomfortable with the division of a significant portion of the sphincters and the possibility of its causing incontinence in the long term [1, 6, 7]. The seton technique remains popular currently. Although the draining seton technique aims to minimize incontinence while enabling continual drainage, it is not always successful and patients are often subjected to repeated operations. On the other hand, the cutting seton technique can also result in incontinence in the long term [1, 6, 10, 11]. The advancement flap procedure is usually adopted as the definitive procedure in such cases when the sepsis has been adequately drained by using a seton [11-13]. Albeit with high success rates, the technique is difficult to master.

With the aforementioned considerations in mind, the authors are proposing treating this condition via a novel approach through the intersphincteric space. To our knowledge, this technique for the management of DPA space sepsis has not been described in the literature. A success rate of 70.6% was achieved during our initial experience with this procedure.

This new approach addresses the underlying etiology of all DPA space abscesses (including bilateral horseshoe abscesses), which is the infected anal crypt gland in the posterior intersphincteric space. At the same time, adequate drainage of the DPA space can be achieved without creating lengthy incisions over the ischioanal fossae. This technique can also be successfully performed as a single-stage procedure.

In our study, the 12 patients who had had no recent drainage surgery demonstrated a higher success rate of 91.7% (11/12), compared to 20% (1/5) in the group of patients who had undergone recent prior drainage. We believe that the critical step in this technique lies in the successful identification of the intersphincteric space and the excision of the infected anal crypt gland, i.e., the intersphincteric tract. A possible explanation for this difference could be the fibrosis and the obliteration of the intersphincteric space following the resolution of the inflammation in the same area after the initial drainage procedure. This would often make any subsequent dissection in the intersphincteric space and identification and excision of the intersphincteric tract technically more difficult. However, the number of patients in our series is too small to make any concrete conclusions at this juncture.

Apart from the small number of patients, the retrospective nature of our series and the relatively short duration of follow-up are also limitations. There were also no confirmatory radiological investigations to confirm the resolution of the DPA space sepsis. In addition, incontinence scoring was not obtained for these patients.

When compared to the commonly-adopted techniques for DPA space sepsis, the advantages of this new technique are obvious. This technique can be performed as a single-stage procedure, with minimal morbidity and acceptable success rates. It essentially obviates the need for repeated operations over a long period of time. A prolonged period of postoperative wound care would also be unnecessary. The long-term success rates of this technique and its impact on continence will be issues that require further studies. A comparative prospective study between the various techniques advocated for DPA space sepsis would be ideal.

In conclusion, managing DPA space sepsis via an intersphincteric approach is promising and has an acceptable success rate. This single-staged technique enables effective drainage of the sepsis and removal of the primary pathology via the intersphincteric space.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

This article was presented as a poster in the ASCRS Annual Meeting held in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada from 14-18 May 2011.

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

REFERENCES

1. Pezim ME. Successful treatment of horseshoe fistula requires deroofing of deep postanal space. Am J Surg 1994;167:513–515. Article PubMed
2. Hamilton CH. Anorectal problems: the deep postanal space: surgical significance in horseshoe fistula and abscess. Dis Colon Rectum 1975;18:642–645. Article PubMed
3. Hanley PH. Conservative surgical correction of horseshoe abscess and fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 1965;8:364–368. Article PubMed
4. Hanley PH, Ray JE, Pennington EE, Grablowsky OM. Fistula-in-ano: a ten-year follow-up study of horseshoe-abscess fistula-in-ano. Dis Colon Rectum 1976;19:507–515. Article PubMed
5. Rosen SA, Colquhoun P, Efron J, Vernava AM 3rd, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD, et al. Horseshoe abscesses and fistulas: how are we doing? Surg Innov 2006;13:17–21. Article PubMed
6. Held D, Khubchandani I, Sheets J, Stasik J, Rosen L, Riether R. Management of anorectal horseshoe abscess and fistula. Dis Colon Rectum 1986;29:793–797. Article PubMed
7. Inceoglu R, Gencosmanoglu R. Fistulotomy and drainage of deep postanal space abscess in the treatment of posterior horseshoe fistula. BMC Surg 2003;3:10.Article PubMed PMC
8. Rojanasakul A. LIFT procedure: a simplified technique for fistula-in-ano. Tech Coloproctol 2009;13:237–240. Article PubMed
9. Rojanasakul A, Pattanaarun J, Sahakitrungruang C, Tantiphlachiva K. Total anal sphincter saving technique for fistula-in-ano; the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract. J Med Assoc Thai 2007;90:581–586. PubMed
10. Garcia-Aguilar J, Belmonte C, Wong DW, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD. Cutting seton versus two-stage seton fistulotomy in the surgical management of high anal fistula. Br J Surg 1998;85:243–245. Article PubMed
11. Browder LK, Sweet S, Kaiser AM. Modified Hanley procedure for management of complex horseshoe fistulae. Tech Coloproctol 2009;13:301–306. Article PubMed
12. Jarrar A, Church J. Advancement flap repair: a good option for complex anorectal fistulas. Dis Colon Rectum 2011;54:1537–1541. Article PubMed
13. Dubsky PC, Stift A, Friedl J, Teleky B, Herbst F. Endorectal advancement flaps in the treatment of high anal fistula of cryptoglandular origin: full-thickness vs. mucosal-rectum flaps. Dis Colon Rectum 2008;51:852–857. Article PubMed

Fig. 1

Endoanal ultrasonographic image of a deep postanal space abscess (axial view).

Fig. 2

Endoanal ultrasonographic image of a deep postanal space abscess (3-dimentional view).

Fig. 3

Identification of the intersphincteric tract.

Fig. 4

Illustration of the access to the deep postanal (DPA) space through the intersphincteric incision.

Fig. 5

Flowchart of all the patients who underwent the intersphincteric approach for a deep postanal (DPA) space abscess.

Table 1

Group of patients who underwent the intersphincteric approach operation as the primary procedure

Table 2

Group of patients who underwent the intersphincteric approach operation after an initial drainage procedure

Figure & Data

References

Citations

Citations to this article as recorded by

Deep Postanal Abscess With Sacrococcygeal Osteomyelitis: A Case Report
Javid Ahmadov, Mustafa Anil Turhan, Ender Erguder, Sezai Leventoğlu, Bulent Mentes
Cureus.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Is Primary Opening of Fistula-in-Ano Always at Dentate Line: Correlation Between MRI and Operative Findings in 379 Patients
Pankaj Garg, Gabriele Naldini, Vincent De Parades, Petr Tsarkov, Vipul Yagnik, Kaushik Bhattacharya, Baljit Kaur, G Mahak
Clinical and Experimental Gastroenterology.2025; Volume 18: 121. CrossRef
Process to determine the level of the primary internal opening of anal fistula on magnetic resonance imaging
Pankaj Garg, Baljit Kaur, G. Mahak
Annals of Coloproctology.2025; 41(3): 253. CrossRef
Identifying landmark factors of anal fistulas through predictive modelling for adverse surgical outcomes: a retrospective cohort study
Guanlin Liu, Kaiqiang Xu, Qiang Meng, Jing Wang, Yunwei Li
BMC Surgery.2025;[Epub] CrossRef
Anorectal Abscess
Anna Kata, Jonathan S. Abelson
Clinics in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2024; 37(06): 368. CrossRef
Research Progress on Diagnosis and Surgical Treatment of Perianal Deep Space Abscess
永罡秦
Advances in Clinical Medicine.2023; 13(01): 180. CrossRef
A Rare Case of Posterior Horseshoe Abscess Extending to Anterolateral Extraperitoneal Compartment: Anatomical and Technical Considerations
Christianna Oikonomou, Periklis Alepas, Stelios Gavriil, Dimitrios Kalliouris, Konstantinos Manesis, Petros Bouboulis, Dimitrios Filippou, Panagiotis Skandalakis
Annals of Coloproctology.2019; 35(4): 216. CrossRef
Klinische Anatomie der Anorektalregion in Bezug auf das Analfistelleiden
S. Stelzner, T. Wedel
coloproctology.2019; 41(6): 390. CrossRef
Understanding and Treating Supralevator Fistula-in-Ano: MRI Analysis of 51 Cases and a Review of Literature
Pankaj Garg
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2018; 61(5): 612. CrossRef
The treatment of anal fistula: secondACPGBIPosition Statement – 2018
G. Williams, A. Williams, P. Tozer, R. Phillips, A. Ahmad, D. Jayne, C. Maxwell‐Armstrong
Colorectal Disease.2018; 20(S3): 5. CrossRef
Transanal opening of intersphincteric space (TROPIS) - A new procedure to treat high complex anal fistula
Pankaj Garg
International Journal of Surgery.2017; 40: 130. CrossRef
Clinical Significance of 2 Deep Posterior Perianal Spaces to Complex Cryptoglandular Fistulas
Heng Zhang, Zhi-yang Zhou, Bang Hu, De-chao Liu, Hui Peng, Shang-kui Xie, Dan Su, Dong-lin Ren
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2016; 59(8): 766. CrossRef
Complex Fistula-In-Ano
J. Graham Williams
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum.2016; 59(8): 707. CrossRef
S3-Leitlinie: Analabszess
A. Ommer, A. Herold, E. Berg, St. Farke, A. Fürst, F. Hetzer, A. Köhler, S. Post, R. Ruppert, M. Sailer, T. Schiedeck, O. Schwandner, B. Strittmatter, B. H. Lenhard, W. Bader, S. Krege, H. Krammer, E. Stange
coloproctology.2016; 38(6): 378. CrossRef
Behandlung kryptoglandulärer, supralevatorischer Abszesse im MRT-Zeitalter: eine Fallserie
A. Furtwängler
coloproctology.2015; 37(3): 214. CrossRef
Modern management of deep post-anal space abscess and horseshoe fistulas
Reuben D. Shin, Jason F. Hall
Seminars in Colon and Rectal Surgery.2014; 25(4): 210. CrossRef

Cite this Article

Cite this Article: export Copy Download Format; Close

Download Citation

Download a citation file in RIS format that can be imported by all major citation management software, including EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and Reference Manager.

Format:

RIS — For EndNote, ProCite, RefWorks, and most other reference management software
BibTeX — For JabRef, BibDesk, and other BibTeX-specific software

Include:

Citation for the content below
Citation and abstract for the content below

Managing Deep Postanal Space Sepsis via an Intersphincteric Approach: Our Early Experience

Ann Coloproctol. 2013;29(2):55-59. Published online April 30, 2013

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3393/ac.2013.29.2.55

XML Download

Figure

Managing Deep Postanal Space Sepsis via an Intersphincteric Approach: Our Early Experience

Fig. 1 Endoanal ultrasonographic image of a deep postanal space abscess (axial view).

Fig. 2 Endoanal ultrasonographic image of a deep postanal space abscess (3-dimentional view).

Fig. 3 Identification of the intersphincteric tract.

Fig. 4 Illustration of the access to the deep postanal (DPA) space through the intersphincteric incision.

Fig. 5 Flowchart of all the patients who underwent the intersphincteric approach for a deep postanal (DPA) space abscess.

Fig. 1

Fig. 2

Fig. 3

Fig. 4

Fig. 5

Managing Deep Postanal Space Sepsis via an Intersphincteric Approach: Our Early Experience

Table 1

Group of patients who underwent the intersphincteric approach operation as the primary procedure

Table 2

Group of patients who underwent the intersphincteric approach operation after an initial drainage procedure

Table 1 Group of patients who underwent the intersphincteric approach operation as the primary procedure

Table 2 Group of patients who underwent the intersphincteric approach operation after an initial drainage procedure